# Triple Positive Solutions for a Type of Second-Order Singular Boundary Problems

- Jiemei Li
^{1, 2}Email author and - Jinxiang Wang
^{1}

**2010**:376471

**DOI: **10.1155/2010/376471

© Jiemei Li and Jinxiang Wang. 2010

**Received: **7 April 2010

**Accepted: **26 August 2010

**Published: **1 September 2010

## Abstract

This paper deals with the existence of triple positive solutions for a type of second-order singular boundary problems with general differential operators. By using the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem, we establish an existence criterion for at least three positive solutions with suitable growth conditions imposed on the nonlinear term.

## 1. Introduction

It is easy to see that and may be singular at and/or

When or and , the two kinds of singular boundary value problems have been discussed extensively in the literature; see [1–10] and the references therein. Hence, the problem that we consider is more general and is different from those in previous work.

Furthermore, we will see in the later that the presence of brings us three main difficulties:

(1) the Green's function cannot be explicitly expressed;

(2) the equivalence between BVP (1.1) and its associated integral equation has to be proved;

(3) the compactness of associated integral operator has to be verified.

We will overcome the above mentioned difficulties in Section 2. Also, although the Leggett-William fixed point theorem is used extensively in the study of triple positive differential equations, the method has not been used to study this type of second-order singular boundary value problem with general differential operators. We are concerned with solving these problems in this paper.

To state our main tool used in this paper, we give some definitions and notations.

Theorem 1.1 (Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem).

Let be completely continuous, and let be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on such that for all . Suppose that there exist such that

(i) and , for ;

(ii) , for ;

(iii) , for with .

Then has at least three fixed points in satisfying and .

Remark 1.2.

We note the existence of triple positive solutions of other kind of boundary value problems; see He and Ge [11], Zhao et al. [12], Zhang and Liu [13], Graef et al. [14], and the references therein.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we overcome the above-mentioned difficulties in this work. The main results are formulated and proved in Section 3. Finally, an example is presented to demonstrate the application of the main theorems in Section 4.

## 2. Preliminaries and Lemmas

Throughout this paper, we assume the following:

(H1) ;

(H2) , and ;

(H3) is continuous and does not vanish identically on any subinterval of , and ;

(H4) is continuous.

Lemma 2.1.

Suppose that (H1) and (H2) hold. Then

has a unique solution and ;

has a unique solution and .

Proof.

We only prove (i). (ii) can be treated in the same way.

which implies that is a solution of integral equation (2.11).

Conversely, if is a solution of (2.11) with , by reversing the above argument we could deduce that the function is a solution of (2.1) and satisfy and . Therefore, to prove that (2.1) has a unique solution, , and is equivalent to prove that (2.11) has a unique solution .

Since , has a unique fixed point by Banach contraction principle. That is, (2.11) has a unique solution .

Remark 2.2.

Lemma 2.1 generalizes Theorem of [1], where .

Lemma 2.3.

Suppose that (H1) and (H2) hold. Then

(i) is nondecreasing in ;

(ii) is nonincreasing in .

Proof.

We only prove (i). (ii) can be treated in the same way.

which is a contradiction!

Remark 2.4.

then, , which is a contradiction!

The other inequality can be treated in the same manner.

Lemma 2.5.

Proof.

Lemma 2.6.

Moreover, on .

Proof.

This together with Remark 2.4 implies that the right side of (2.31) is well defined.

Lemma 2.7.

Proof.

Then Lemma 2.3 guarantees that , and Lemma 2.7 guarantees that (2.43) holds.

Remark 2.8.

Lemma 2.9.

Let (H1)–(H4) hold. Then is a completely continuous operator.

Proof.

From (H3) and (H4) and Lemma 2.6, it is easy to see that , and is continuous by the Lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem.

Let be any bounded set. Then (H3) and (H4) imply that is a bounded set in .

From this fact, it is easy to verify that is equicontinuous. Therefore, by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, is a completely continuous operator.

## 3. Main Result

We notice that, for each , , and also that by Lemma 2.6, is a solution of (1.1) if and only if is a fixed point of the operator .

Theorem 3.1.

Assume that (H1)–(H4) hold. Let , and suppose that satisfies the following conditions:

(S1) , for ;

(S2) , for ;

(S3) , for .

Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least three positive solutions in satisfying , and .

Proof.

Hence, . In the same way, if , then . Therefore, condition (ii) of Leggett-williams fixed-point theorem holds.

To sum up, all the conditions of Leggett-williams fixed-point theorem are satisfied. Therefore, has at least three fixed points, that is, problem (1.1) has at least three positive solutions in satisfying and .

Theorem 3.2.

Assume that (H1)–(H4) hold. Let , and suppose that satisfies the following conditions:

(A1) , for ;

(A2) , for .

Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least positive solutions.

Proof.

When , it follows from condition (A1) that , which means that has at least one fixed point by the Schauder fixed-point Theorem. When , it is clear that Theorem 3.1 holds (with ). Then we can obtain at least three positive solutions , and satisfying and with . Following this way, we finish the proof by the induction method.

## 4. Example

The other inequalities in (4.4) can be proved by the same method.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

The first author was partially supported by NNSF of China (10901075).

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- O'Regan D:
**Singular Dirichlet boundary value problems. I. Superlinear and nonresonant case.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*1997,**29**(2):221-245. 10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00026-0MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Asakawa H:
**Nonresonant singular two-point boundary value problems.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*2001,**44**(6):791-809. 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00308-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dalmasso R:
**Positive solutions of singular boundary value problems.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*1996,**27**(6):645-652. 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00073-5MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dunninger DR, Wang HY:
**Multiplicity of positive radial solutions for an elliptic system on an annulus.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*2000,**42**(5):803-811. 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00125-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Ha KS, Lee Y-H:
**Existence of multiple positive solutions of singular boundary value problems.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*1997,**28**(8):1429-1438. 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00231-JMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Habets P, Zanolin F:
**Upper and lower solutions for a generalized Emden-Fowler equation.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1994,**181**(3):684-700. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1052MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kim C-G, Lee Y-H:
**Existence and multiplicity results for nonlinear boundary value problems.***Computers & Mathematics with Applications*2008,**55**(12):2870-2886. 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.09.007MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Wong FH:
**Existence of positive solutions of singular boundary value problems.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*1993,**21**(5):397-406. 10.1016/0362-546X(93)90083-5MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Xu X, Ma JP:
**A note on singular nonlinear boundary value problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2004,**293**(1):108-124. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.017MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Yang XJ:
**Positive solutions for nonlinear singular boundary value problems.***Applied Mathematics and Computation*2002,**130**(2-3):225-234. 10.1016/S0096-3003(01)00046-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - He XM, Ge WG:
**Triple solutions for second-order three-point boundary value problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2002,**268**(1):256-265. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7824MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Zhao DX, Wang HZ, Ge WG:
**Existence of triple positive solutions to a class of**p**-Laplacian boundary value problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007,**328**(2):972-983. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.073MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Zhang BG, Liu XY:
**Existence of multiple symmetric positive solutions of higher order Lidstone problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2003,**284**(2):672-689. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00386-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Graef JR, Henderson J, Wong PJY, Yang B:
**Three solutions of an**n**th order three-point focal type boundary value problem.***Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*2008,**69**(10):3386-3404. 10.1016/j.na.2007.09.024MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.