Open Access

Non-local boundary value problems for impulsive fractional integro-differential equations in Banach spaces

Boundary Value Problems20122012:145

DOI: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-145

Received: 23 July 2012

Accepted: 21 November 2012

Published: 11 December 2012

Abstract

In this study, we establish some conditions for existence and uniqueness of the solutions to semilinear fractional impulsive integro-differential evolution equations with non-local conditions by using Schauder’s fixed point theorem and the contraction mapping principle.

MSC:26A33, 34A37.

Keywords

boundary value problem Caputo type fractional derivative existence and uniqueness fixed point theorem impulsive integro-differential equation nonlocal condition

1 Introduction

The topic of fractional differential equations has received a great deal of attention from many scientists and researchers during the past decades; see, for instance, [17]. This is mostly due to the fact that fractional calculus provides an efficient and excellent instrument to describe many practical dynamical phenomena which arise in engineering and science such as physics, chemistry, biology, economy, viscoelasticity, electrochemistry, electromagnetic, control, porous media; see [813]. Moreover, many researchers study the existence of solutions for fractional differential equations; see [1416] and the references therein.

In particular, several authors have considered a nonlocal Cauchy problem for abstract evolution differential equations having fractional order. Indeed, the nonlocal Cauchy problem for abstract evolution differential equations was studied by Byszewski [17, 18] initially. Afterwards, many authors [1921] discussed the problem for different kinds of nonlinear differential equations and integrodifferential equations including functional differential equations in Banach spaces. Balachandran et al. [22, 23] established the existence of solutions of quasilinear integrodifferential equations with nonlocal conditions. N’Guérékata [24] and Balachandran and Park [25] researched the existence of solutions of fractional abstract differential equations with a nonlocal initial condition. Ahmad [26] obtained some existence results for boundary value problems of fractional semilinear evolution equations. Recently, Balachandran and Trujillo [27] have investigated the nonlocal Cauchy problem for nonlinear fractional integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces.

On the other hand, the theory of impulsive differential equations for integer order has emerged in mathematical modeling of phenomena and practical situations in both physical and social sciences in recent years. One can see a significant development in impulsive theory. We refer the readers to [2831] for the general theory and applications of impulsive differential equations. Besides, some researchers (see [3235] and the references therein) have addressed the theory of boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations.

However, only a few studies were concerned with the Cauchy problem for impulsive evolution differential equations of fractional order; see [3638]. Further, in [38], Balachandran et al. studied the existence of solutions for fractional impulsive integrodifferential equations of the following type:
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equa_HTML.gif

where 0 t T and 0 < q < 1 , by using the contraction mapping principle.

Motivated by the aforementioned works, in this paper, we deal with the existence and uniqueness of solutions for a boundary value problem (BVP), for the following impulsive fractional semilinear integro-differential equation with nonlocal conditions:
{ D q C u ( t ) = A ( t ) u ( t ) + f ( t , u ( t ) , 0 t k ( t , s , u ( s ) ) d s ) , t J : = [ 0 , 1 ] , t t k , Δ u ( t k ) = I k ( u ( t k ) ) , Δ u ( t k ) = I k ( u ( t k ) ) , k = 1 , 2 , , p , α u ( 0 ) + β u ( 0 ) = g 1 ( u ) , α u ( 1 ) + β u ( 1 ) = g 2 ( u ) ,
(1.1)
where 1 < q < 2 , D α C is the Caputo fractional derivative, A ( t ) is a bounded linear operator on a Banach space X, f C ( J × X × X , X ) , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_IEq7_HTML.gif , I k , I k C ( X , X ) , g 1 , g 2 : P C ( J , X ) X ( P C ( J , X ) will be defined in the next section),
Δ u ( t k ) = u ( t k + ) u ( t k )
with
u ( t k + ) = lim h 0 + u ( t k + h ) , u ( t k ) = lim h 0 u ( t k + h )

and Δ u ( t k ) has a similar meaning for u ( t ) , 0 = t 0 < t 1 < t 2 < < t p < t p + 1 = 1 , and α , β 0 . Here https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_IEq15_HTML.gif . For brevity, let us take K u ( t ) = 0 t k ( t , s , u ( s ) ) d s .

Meanwhile, nonlinear functions f of this type with the integral term k occur in mathematical problems that are concerned with the heat flow in materials having memory and viscoelastic problems; see [39]. Also, as indicated in [40, 41], nonlocal conditions can be more useful than standard conditions to describe physical phenomena. For example, in [41], the author described the diffusion phenomenon of a small amount of gas in a transparent tube by using the formula
g ( u ) = i = 1 m η i u ( ξ i ) ,

where η i , i = 1 , 2 , , m are given constants and 0 < ξ 1 < ξ 2 < < ξ m < T .

Note that in this work, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that a general boundary value problem for impulsive semilinear evolution integrodifferential equations of fractional order 1 < q < 2 with nonlocal conditions has been considered.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some notations and preliminary results about fractional calculus and differential equations to be used in the following sections. In Section 3, we discuss some existence and uniqueness results for solutions of BVP (1.1). Namely, the first result is based on Schauder’s fixed point theorem and the second one is based on Banach’s fixed point theorem. Finally, we shall give an illustrative example for our results.

2 Preliminaries

In order to model the real world application, the fractional differential equations are considered by using the fractional derivatives. There are many different starting points for the discussion of classical fractional calculus; see, for example, [42]. One can begin with a generalization of repeated integration. If f ( t ) is absolutely integrable on [ 0 , b ) , it can be found [42, 43]
0 t d t n 0 t n d t n 1 0 t 3 d t 2 0 t 2 f ( t 1 ) d t 1 = 1 ( n + 1 ) ! 0 t ( t t 1 ) n 1 f ( t 1 ) d t 1 = 1 ( n + 1 ) ! t n 1 f ( t ) ,
where n = 1 , 2 , and 0 t b . On writing Γ ( n ) = ( n 1 ) ! , an immediate generalization in the form of the operation I α defined for α > 0 is
( I α f ) ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t t 1 ) α 1 f ( t 1 ) d t 1 = 1 Γ ( α ) t α 1 f ( t ) , 0 t < b ,
(2.1)

where Γ ( α ) is the gamma function and t α 1 f ( t ) = 0 t f ( t t 1 ) α 1 ( t 1 ) d t 1 is called the convolution product of t α 1 and f ( t ) . Now Eq. (2.1) is known as a fractional integral of order α for the function f ( t ) .

Next, we give some basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus theory used in this paper; see [1, 4, 28, 31, 32].

Let J 0 = [ 0 , t 1 ] , J 1 = ( t 1 , t 2 ] , …,  J k 1 = ( t k 1 , t k ] , J k = ( t k , t k + 1 ] , and J : = [ 0 , T ] { t 1 , t 2 , , t p } , then we define the set of functions as follows:

P C ( J , X ) = { u : J X : u C ( ( t k , t k + 1 ] , X ) , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , p  and there exist  u ( t k + )  and u ( t k ) , k = 1 , 2 , , p  with  u ( t k ) = u ( t k ) } and

P C 1 ( J , X ) = { u P C ( J , X ) , u C ( ( t k , t k + 1 ] , X ) , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , p  and there exist  u ( t k + )  and u ( t k ) , k = 1 , 2 , , p  with  u ( t k ) = u ( t k ) } which is a Banach space with the norm
u = sup t J { u P C , u P C } where  u P C : = sup { | u ( t ) | : t J } .

Now, B ( X ) denotes the Banach space of bounded linear operators from X into X with the norm A B ( X ) = sup { A ( u ) : u = 1 } .

Definition 1 [1, 4]

The fractional (arbitrary) order integral of the function h L 1 ( J , R + ) of order q R + is defined by
I 0 + q h ( t ) = 1 Γ ( q ) 0 t ( t s ) q 1 h ( s ) d s ,

where Γ ( ) is the Euler gamma function.

Definition 2 [1, 4]

For a function h given on the interval J, the Caputo-type fractional derivative of order q > 0 is defined by
D 0 + q C h ( t ) = 1 Γ ( n q ) 0 t ( t s ) n q 1 h ( n ) ( s ) d s , n = [ q ] + 1 ,

where the function h ( t ) has absolutely continuous derivatives up to order ( n 1 ) .

Lemma 1 [1]

Let q > 0 , then the differential equation
D q C h ( t ) = 0
has the following solution:
h ( t ) = c 0 + c 1 t + c 2 t 2 + + c n 1 t n 1 , c i R , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , , n 1 , n = [ q ] + 1 .

Lemma 2 [14]

Let q > 0 , then
I q C D q h ( t ) = h ( t ) + c 0 + c 1 t + c 2 t 2 + + c n 1 t n 1

for some c i R , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , , n 1 , n = [ q ] + 1 .

Now, by using the Kronecker convolution product, see [7], the fractional integral becomes
( I α f ) ( x ) = 1 Γ ( α ) x α 1 f ( x ) ξ T 1 Γ ( α ) { x α 1 ϕ m ( x ) } .
(2.2)
Thus, if x α 1 ϕ m ( x ) can be integrated, then expanded in block pulse functions, the fractional integral is solved via the block pulse functions operational matrix as follows:
1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t t 1 ) α 1 ϕ m ( t 1 ) d t 1 F α ϕ m ( t ) ,
where
ψ m ( t ) = { 1 ( m 1 i ) b t < ( m i ) b , 0 elsewhere
for m = 1 , 2 , , i and
F α = ( b m ) α 1 Γ ( α + 2 ) [ 1 ξ 2 ξ 3 ξ m 0 1 ξ 2 ξ m 1 0 0 1 ξ m 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ] ;

see [7].

Now, we need the following lemma for our study.

Lemma 3 Let 1 < q < 2 and h : J X be continuous. A function u ( t ) is a solution of the fractional integral equation
u ( t ) = { 0 t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + ( β α t ) [ t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + i = 1 k ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) ( t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + 1 α ( g 1 ( u ) g 2 ( u ) ) ] + g 1 ( u ) α , t J 0 , t k t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + i = 1 k ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + i = 1 k ( t t i ) t i 1 t i ( ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + ( β α t ) [ t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + i = 1 k ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) ( t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + 1 α ( g 1 ( u ) g 2 ( u ) ) ] + g 1 ( u ) α , t J k
(2.3)
if and only if u ( t ) is a solution of the fractional BVP
D q C u ( t ) = h ( t ) , t J Δ u ( t k ) = I k ( u ( t k ) ) , Δ u ( t k ) = I k ( u ( t k ) ) , α u ( 0 ) + β u ( 0 ) = g 1 ( u ) , α u ( 1 ) + β u ( 1 ) = g 2 ( u ) ,
(2.4)

where k = 1 , 2 , , p .

Proof Let u be the solution of (2.4). If t J 0 , then Lemma 2 implies that
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equo_HTML.gif

for some c 0 , c 1 R .

Applying the boundary condition α u ( 0 ) + β u ( 0 ) = g 1 ( u ) for t J 0 , we find that
u ( t ) = 0 t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + c 1 ( β α t ) + g 1 ( u ) α .
(2.5)
If t J 1 , then Lemma 2 implies that
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equp_HTML.gif
for some d 0 , d 1 R . Thus, we have
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equq_HTML.gif
In the view of
Δ u ( t 1 ) = u ( t 1 + ) u ( t 1 ) = I 1 ( u ( t 1 ) ) and Δ u ( t 1 ) = u ( t 1 + ) u ( t 1 ) = I 1 ( u ( t 1 ) ) ,
we have
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equs_HTML.gif
Hence,
u ( t ) = t 1 t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + 0 t 1 ( t 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + ( t t 1 ) [ 0 t 1 ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I 1 ( u ( t 1 ) ) ] + I 1 ( u ( t 1 ) ) + c 1 ( β α t ) + g 1 ( u ) α , for  t J 1 .
By repeating the process, for t J k , we have
u ( t ) = t k t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + i = 1 k [ t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ] + i = 1 k ( t t i ) [ t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ] + c 1 ( β α t ) + g 1 ( u ) α .
(2.6)
Now, applying the boundary condition
α u ( 1 ) + β u ( 1 ) = g 2 ( u ) ,
we find that
c 1 = t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + i = 1 k [ t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ] + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) [ t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) h ( s ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ] + 1 α [ g 1 ( u ) g 2 ( u ) ] .

Substituting the value of c 1 in (2.5) and (2.6), we obtain Eq. 2.3.

Conversely, if we assume that u satisfies the impulsive fractional integral equation (2.3), then by direct computation, we can easily see that the solution given by (2.3) satisfies (2.4). Thus, the proof of Lemma 3 is complete. □

3 Main results

Definition 3 A function u P C 1 ( J , X ) with its q-derivative existing on J is said to be a solution of (1.1) if u satisfies the equation
D q C u ( t ) = A ( t ) u ( t ) + f ( t , u ( t ) , K u ( t ) )
on J and satisfies the conditions
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equx_HTML.gif
Now, we define the operator T : P C 1 ( J , X ) P C 1 ( J , X ) by
T u ( t ) = { t k t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + i = 1 k ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + i = 1 k ( t t i ) × ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + ( β α t ) [ t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + i = 1 k ( t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) × ( t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( A ( s ) u ( s ) + f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) ) d s + I i ( u ( t i ) ) ) + 1 α ( g 1 ( u ) g 2 ( u ) ) ] + g 1 ( u ) α , t J k .
(3.1)

Clearly, the fixed points of the operator T are the solutions of problem (1.1). To begin with, we need the following assumptions to prove the existence and uniqueness of a solution of the integral equation (2.3) which satisfies BVP (1.1):

(A1) A : X X is a continuous bounded linear operator and there exists a constant A 1 > 0 such that A ( u ) B ( X ) A 1 for all u X ;

(A2) The function f : J × X × X X is continuous and there exists a constant M 1 > 0 such that M 1 = max s J { f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) , u X } ;

(A3) I k , I k : X X are continuous and there exist constants M 2 > 0 and M 3 > 0 such that I k ( u ) M 2 , I k ( u ) M 3 for each u X and k = 1 , 2 , , p ;

(A4) There exist constants G i > 0 and g i : P C 1 ( J , X ) X are continuous functions such that g i ( u ) G i , i = 1 , 2 ;

(A5) There exists a constant L 1 > 0 such that
f ( t , u 1 , v 1 ) f ( t , u 2 , v 2 ) L 1 ( u 1 u 2 + v 1 v 2 ) ,

t J , and u 1 , u 2 , v 1 , v 2 X ;

(A6) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_IEq83_HTML.gif is continuous and there exists a constant L 2 > 0 such that
k ( t , s , u ) k ( t , s , v ) L 2 u v

for all u , v X ;

(A7) There exist constants L 3 > 0 , L 4 > 0 such that I k ( u ) I k ( v ) L 3 u v , I k ( u ) I k ( v ) L 4 u v for each u , v X and k = 1 , 2 , , p ;

(A8) There exist constants b i > 0 such that g i ( u ) g i ( v ) b i u v , i = 1 , 2 .

The following are the main results of this paper. Our first result relies on Schauder’s fixed point theorem which gives an existence result for solutions of BVP (1.1).

Theorem 1 Assume that the assumptions (A1)-(A4) hold. Then BVP (1.1) has at least one solution on J.

Proof In order to show the existence of a solution of BVP (1.1), we need to transform BVP (1.1) to a fixed point problem by using the operator T in (3.1). Now, we shall use Schauder’s fixed point theorem to prove T has a fixed point which is then a solution of BVP (1.1). First, let us define B r = { u P C 1 ( J ) : u r } for any r > 0 . Then it is clear that the set B r is a closed, bounded and convex. The proof will be given in several steps.

Step 1: T is continuous.

Let { u n } be a sequence such that u n u in P C ( J ) . Then
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equaa_HTML.gif

Since A is a continuous operator and f, g, I, I are continuous functions, we have T u n T u 0 as n .

Step 2: T maps bounded sets into bounded sets.

Now, it is enough to show that there exists a positive constant l such that T u l for each u B r . Then we have, for each t J ,
| ( T u ) ( t ) | t k t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k ( t t i ) t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + | β α t | [ t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + 1 α ( | g 1 ( u ) | + | g 2 ( u ) | ) ] + 1 α | g 1 ( u ) | .
Thus,
| ( T u ) ( t ) | ( A 1 r + M 1 ) t k t ( t s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 2 ) i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 3 ) i = 1 k | t t i | t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s + ( β α + 1 ) [ ( A 1 r + M 1 ) ( t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s ) + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 2 ) i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 3 ) i = 1 k ( β α + 1 ) t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s + 1 α ( G 1 + G 2 ) ] + 1 α G 1 1 Γ ( q + 1 ) ( β α + 2 ) ( ( A 1 r + M 1 ) ( 1 + p ) + p M 2 ) + 1 Γ ( q ) [ p ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 3 ) ( 1 + ( β α + 1 ) 2 ) + ( A 1 r + M 1 ) β α ( β α + 1 ) ] + 1 α ( β α + 1 ) ( G 1 + G 2 ) + G 1 = l .

Then it follows that T u l .

Step 3: T maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets.

Let B r be a bounded set of P C 1 ( J ) as in Step 2, and let u B r . Then, letting τ 1 , τ 2 J k with τ 1 < τ 2 , 0 k p , we have
| ( T u ) ( τ 2 ) ( T u ) ( τ 1 ) | τ 1 τ 2 | ( T u ) ( s ) | d s l ˜ ( τ 2 τ 1 ) ,
where
| ( T u ) ( t ) | t k t ( t s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 t k ) t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) ( | A ( s ) | | u ( s ) | + | f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) | + | I i ( u ( t i ) ) | ) d s + 1 α ( | g 1 ( u ) | + | g 2 ( u ) | ) | ( T u ) ( t ) | ( A 1 r + M 1 ) [ t k t ( t s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s + t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + β α t k 1 ( 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s ] + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 2 ) i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 1 Γ ( q ) d s + ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 3 ) × [ i = 1 k t i 1 t i ( t i s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s + i = 1 k ( β α + 1 ) t i 1 t i ( t 1 s ) q 2 Γ ( q 1 ) d s ] + 1 α ( G 1 + G 2 ) 1 Γ ( q + 1 ) [ 2 ( A 1 r + M 1 ) + M 2 ] + 1 α ( G 1 + G 2 ) + 1 Γ ( q ) [ ( A 1 r + M 1 ) ( β α + 1 ) + p ( A 1 r + M 1 + M 3 ) ( β α + 2 ) ] : = l ˜ for any  t J k , 0 k p .

Hence, T ( B r ) is equicontinuous on all the subintervals J k , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , p . Then we can deduce that T : P C 1 ( J , X ) P C 1 ( J , X ) is completely continuous as a result of the Arzela-Ascoli theorem together with Steps 1 to 3.

As a consequence of Schauder’s fixed point theorem, we conclude that T has a fixed point. That is, BVP (1.1) has at least one solution. The proof is complete. □

Our second result is about the uniqueness of the solution of BVP (1.1). And it depends on Banach’s fixed point theorem.

Theorem 2 Assume that (A1)-(A8) hold with
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equ9_HTML.gif
(3.2)
Proof First, we show that T B r B r . Indeed, in order to do this, it is adequate to replace l with r in Step 2 in Theorem 1. Thus, T maps B r into itself. Now, define the mapping T : C ( J , B r ) C ( J , B r ) . Then, for each t J , we have
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equaf_HTML.gif
Observing the inequality
| f ( s , u ( s ) , K u ( s ) ) f ( s , v ( s ) , K v ( s ) ) | L 1 ( | u ( s ) v ( s ) | + | K u ( s ) K v ( s ) | ) L 1 ( 1 + L 2 ) | u ( s ) v ( s ) | ,
we have
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equah_HTML.gif
Thus,
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-145/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_239_Equai_HTML.gif
which implies that
( T u ) ( t ) ( T v ) ( t ) Ω A 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 , b 1 , b 2 , q , α , β u v .

Therefore, by (3.2), the operator T is a contraction. As a consequence of Banach’s fixed point theorem, we deduce that T has a fixed point which is a unique solution of BVP (1.1). □

Example 1 Consider the following boundary value problem for impulsive integrodifferential evolution equation of fractional order:
D 3 2 C u ( t ) = 1 20 ( cos 2 t ) u ( t ) + ( sin 7 t ) | u ( t ) | ( t + 5 ) 4 ( 1 + | u ( t ) | ) D 3 2 C u ( t ) = + 0 t e 1 25 u ( s ) d s , t [ 0 , 1 ] , t 1 2 , Δ u ( 1 2 ) = | u ( 1 2 ) | 15 + | u ( 1 2 ) | , Δ u ( 1 2 ) = | u ( 1 2 ) | 10 + | u ( 1 2 ) | 3 u ( 0 ) + u ( 0 ) = i = 1 m η i u ( ξ i ) , 3 u ( 1 ) + u ( 1 ) = j = 1 m η ˜ j u ˜ ( ξ i ) ,
(3.3)

where 0 < η 1 < η 2 < < 1 , 0 < η ˜ 1 < η ˜ 2 < < 1 , and η i , η ˜ j are given positive constants with i = 1 m η i < 2 15 and j = 1 m η ˜ j < 3 15 .

Here, α = 3 , β = 1 , q = 3 2 , p = 1 . Obviously, A 1 = 1 10 , L 1 = 1 125 , L 2 = 1 25 , L 3 = 1 15 , L 4 = 1 10 , b 1 = 2 15 , b 2 = 3 15 and by (2.5), it can be found that
Ω A 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 , b 1 , b 2 , q , α , β = 1 , 203 , 709 843 , 750 π + 38 135 = 0.63361 < 1 .

Therefore, due to the fact that all the assumptions of Theorem 2 hold, BVP (3.3) has a unique solution. Besides, one can easily check the result of Theorem (1) for BVP (3.3).

Conclusion

In the literature, the authors consider impulsive fractional semilinear evolution integro-differential equations of order 0 < q < 1 in different aspects as mentioned above. Besides, either impulsive fractional semilinear equations of order 1 < q < 2 or impulsive fractional integro-differential equations of order 1 < q < 2 are studied by different authors (see, for instance, [44, 45]). But, to the best of our knowledge, no study considering both cases has been carried out. Thus, in this article, we consider a general boundary value problem for impulsive fractional semilinear evolution integro-differential equations of order 1 < q < 2 with nonlocal conditions. Therefore, the present results are new and complementary to previously known literature.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to the referees for the careful and noteworthy reading of the manuscript and very helpful suggestions that improved the manuscript substantially. The second author gratefully acknowledges that this research was partially supported by the University Putra Malaysia under the ERGS Grant Scheme (project No. 5527068).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Yuzuncu Yil University
(2)
Department of Mathematics and Institute for Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia

References

  1. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ North-Holland Mathematics Studies 204. In Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. Lakshmikantham V, Leela S, Devi JV: Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems. Cambridge Scientific Publishers, Cambridge; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Miller KS, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations. Wiley, New York; 1993.Google Scholar
  4. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Elbeleze AA, Kılıçman A, Taib BM: Applications of homotopy perturbation and variational iteration methods for Fredholm integro-differential equation of fractional order. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 763139. doi:10.1155/2012/763139Google Scholar
  6. Kadem A, Kılıçman A: The approximate solution of fractional Fredholm integro-differential equations by variational iteration and homotopy perturbation methods. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 486193Google Scholar
  7. Kılıçman A, Al Zhour ZAA: Kronecker operational matrices for fractional calculus and some applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 187(1):250-265. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.122MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Diethelm K, Freed AD: On the solution of nonlinear fractional order differential equations used in the modeling of viscoelasticity. In Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering II-Computational Fluid Dynamics, Reaction Engineering and Molecular Properties. Edited by: Keil F, Mackens W, Voss H, Werther J. Springer, Heidelberg; 1999:217-224.Google Scholar
  9. Gaul L, Klein P, Kempfle S: Damping description involving fractional operators. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 1991, 5: 81-88. 10.1016/0888-3270(91)90016-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Glockle WG, Nonnenmacher TF: A fractional calculus approach of self-similar protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 1995, 68: 46-53. 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80157-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilfer R: Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mainardi F: Fractional calculus, some basic problems in continuum and statistical mechanics. In Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics. Edited by: Carpinteri A, Mainardi F. Springer, Wien; 1997:291-348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Metzler F, Schick W, Kilian HG, Nonnenmache TF: Relaxation in filled polymers: a fractional calculus approach. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103: 7180-7186. 10.1063/1.470346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bai Z, Lü H: Positive solutions for the boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 311: 495-505. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.052MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Agarwal RP, Benchohra M, Hamani S: A survey on existence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions. Acta Appl. Math. 2010, 109(3):973-1033. 10.1007/s10440-008-9356-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang L, Chen H: Nonlocal boundary value problem for impulsive differential equations of fractional order. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2011., 2011: Article ID 404917. doi:10.1155/2011/404917Google Scholar
  17. Byszewski L: Theorems about the existence and uniqueness of solutions of a semilinear evolution nonlocal Cauchy problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1991, 162: 494-505. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90164-UMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Byszewski L: Theorems about the existence and uniqueness of continuous solutions of nonlocal problem for nonlinear hyperbolic equation. Appl. Anal. 1991, 40: 173-180. 10.1080/00036819108840001MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Byszewski L, Acka H: Existence of solutions of semilinear functional differential evolution nonlocal problems. Nonlinear Anal. 1998, 34: 65-72. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00693-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Balachandran K, Park JY: Existence of mild solution of a functional integrodifferential equation with nonlocal condition. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2001, 38: 175-182.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Balachandran K, Uchiyama K: Existence of solutions of quasilinear integrodifferential equations with nonlocal condition. Tokyo J. Math. 2000, 23: 203-210. 10.3836/tjm/1255958815MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Balachandran K, Park DG: Existence of solutions of quasilinear integrodifferential evolution equations in Banach spaces. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2009, 46: 691-700.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Balachandran K, Samuel FP: Existence of solutions for quasilinear delay integrodifferential equations with nonlocal condition. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2009, 2009(6):1-7.Google Scholar
  24. N’Guérékata GM: A Cauchy problem for some fractional abstract differential equation with non local conditions. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2009, 70: 1873-1876. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Balachandran K, Park JY: Nonlocal Cauchy problem for abstract fractional semilinear evolution equations. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2009, 71: 4471-4475. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.005MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ahmad B: Some existence results for boundary value problems of fractional semilinear evolution equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2009, 28: 1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Balachandran K, Trujillo JJ: The nonlocal Cauchy problem for nonlinear fractional integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 2010, 72: 4587-4593. 10.1016/j.na.2010.02.035MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas S: Impulsive Differential Equations and Inclusions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, New York; 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Samoilenko AM, Perestyuk NA: Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1995.Google Scholar
  30. Rogovchenko YV: Impulsive evolution systems: main results and new trends. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 1997, 3: 57-88.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Lakshmikantham V, Bainov DD, Simeonov PS: Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ahmad B, Sivasundaram S: On four-point nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear integro-differential equations of fractional order. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 217(2):480-487. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.05.080MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang X, Huang X, Liu Z: The existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for impulsive fractional equations with nonlocal conditions and infinite delay. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2010, 4(4):775-781. 10.1016/j.nahs.2010.05.007MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian Y, Bai Z: Existence results for the three-point impulsive boundary value problem involving fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59(8):2601-2609. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.01.028MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ergören H, Kilicman A: Some existence results for impulsive nonlinear fractional differential equations with closed boundary conditions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 387629. doi:10.1155/2012/387629Google Scholar
  36. Balachandran K, Kiruthika S: Existence of solutions of abstract fractional impulsive semilinear evolution equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 4: 1-12.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chauhan A, Dabas J: Existence of mild solutions for impulsive fractional-order semilinear evolution equations with nonlocal conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011(107):1-10.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Balachandran K, Kiruthika S, Trujillo JJ: Existence results for fractional impulsive integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16: 1970-1977. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.08.005MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Rashid MHM, El-Qaderi Y: Semilinear fractional integrodifferential equations with compact semigroup. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 6276-6282. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.035MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Byszewski L, Lakshmikantham V: Theorem about the existence and uniqueness of a solution of a nonlocal abstract Cauchy problem in a Banach space. Appl. Anal. 1991, 40: 11-19. 10.1080/00036819008839989MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Deng K: Exponential decay of solutions of semilinear parabolic equations with nonlocal initial conditions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 179: 630-637. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1373MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross B: Fractional Calculus and Its Applications. Springer, Berlin; 1975.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sumita H: The matrix laguerre transform. Appl. Math. Comput. 1984, 15: 1-28. 10.1016/0096-3003(84)90050-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence results for nonlinear boundary value problems of fractional integrodifferential equations with integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 708576Google Scholar
  45. Zhang L, Wang G, Song G: On mixed boundary value problem of impulsive semilinear evolution equations of fractional order. Bound. Value Probl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 17Google Scholar

Copyright

© Ergören and Kılıçman; licensee Springer 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.