Partial vanishing viscosity limit for the 2D Boussinesq system with a slip boundary condition
© Jin et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 12 November 2011
Accepted: 15 February 2012
Published: 15 February 2012
This article studies the partial vanishing viscosity limit of the 2D Boussinesq system in a bounded domain with a slip boundary condition. The result is proved globally in time by a logarithmic Sobolev inequality.
2010 MSC: 35Q30; 76D03; 76D05; 76D07.
KeywordsBoussinesq system inviscid limit slip boundary condition
where u, π, and θ denote unknown velocity vector field, pressure scalar and temperature of the fluid. ϵ > 0 is the heat conductivity coefficient and e2:= (0, 1) t . ω:= curlu:= ∂1u2 - ∂2u1 is the vorticity.
The aim of this article is to study the partial vanishing viscosity limit ϵ → 0. When Ω:= ℝ2, the problem has been solved by Chae . When θ = 0, the Boussinesq system reduces to the well-known Navier-Stokes equations. The investigation of the inviscid limit of solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations is a classical issue. We refer to the articles [2–7] when Ω is a bounded domain. However, the methods in [1–6] could not be used here directly. We will use a well-known logarithmic Sobolev inequality in [8, 9] to complete our proof. We will prove:
Here (u, θ) is the unique solution of the problem (1.1)-(1.5) with ϵ = 0.
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Since (1.7) follows easily from (1.6) by the Aubin-Lions compactness principle, we only need to prove the a priori estimates (1.6). From now on we will drop the subscript e and throughout this section C will be a constant independent of ϵ > 0.
for any u ∈ H3(Ω) with divu = 0 in Ω and u · n = 0 on ∂Ω.
for any s > 1 and p ∈ (1, ∞).
with f1: = θ - u1ω, f2:= -u2ω.
on ∂Ω × (0, ∞).
This completes the proof.
This study was partially supported by the Zhejiang Innovation Project (Grant No. T200905), the ZJNSF (Grant No. R6090109), and the NSFC (Grant No. 11171154).
- Chae D: Global regularity for the 2D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity terms. Adv Math 2006, 203: 497-513. 10.1016/j.aim.2005.05.001MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beirão da Veiga H, Crispo F: Sharp inviscid limit results under Navier type boundary conditions. An Lp Theory, J MathFluid Mech 2010, 12: 397-411.Google Scholar
- Beirão da Veiga H, Crispo F: Concerning the Wk, p-inviscid limit for 3-D flows under a slip boundary condition. J Math Fluid Mech 2011, 13: 117-135. 10.1007/s00021-009-0012-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clopeau T, Mikelić A, Robert R: On the vanishing viscosity limit for the 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the friction type boundary conditions. Nonlin-earity 1998, 11: 1625-1636. 10.1088/0951-7715/11/6/011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iftimie D, Planas G: Inviscid limits for the Navier-Stokes equations with Navier friction boundary conditions. Nonlinearity 2006, 19: 899-918. 10.1088/0951-7715/19/4/007MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiao YL, Xin ZP: On the vanishing viscosity limit for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with a slip boundary condition. Commun Pure Appl Math 2007, 60: 1027-1055. 10.1002/cpa.20187MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crispo F: On the zero-viscosity limit for 3D Navier-Stokes equations under slip boundary conditions. Riv Math Univ Parma (N.S.) 2010, 1: 205-217.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari AB: On the blow-up of solutions of 3-D Euler equations in a bounded domain. Commun Math Phys 1993, 155: 277-294. 10.1007/BF02097394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shirota T, Yanagisawa T: A continuation principle for the 3D Euler equations for incompressible fluids in a bounded domain. Proc Japan Acad Ser 1993, A69: 77-82.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourguignon JP, Brezis H: Remarks on the Euler equation. J Funct Anal 1974, 15: 341-363. 10.1016/0022-1236(74)90027-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar