Open Access

Infinitely many solutions for class of Neumann quasilinear elliptic systems

  • Davood Maghsoodi Shoorabi1Email author and
  • Ghasem Alizadeh Afrouzi2
Boundary Value Problems20122012:54

DOI: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-54

Received: 30 January 2012

Accepted: 6 May 2012

Published: 6 May 2012

Abstract

We investigate the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for a class of Neumann quasilinear elliptic systems driven by a (p1, ..., p n )-Laplacian operator. The technical approach is fully based on a recent three critical points theorem.

AMS subject classification: 35J65; 34A15.

Keywords

infinitely many solutions Neumann system critical point theory variational methods

1 Introduction

The purpose of this article is to establish the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for the following Neumann quasilinear elliptic system
- Δ p i u i + a i ( x ) u i p i - 2 u = λ F u i ( x , u 1 , , u n ) in Ω , u i ν = 0 on Ω https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ1_HTML.gif
(1)

for i = 1, ..., n, where Ω N (N ≥ 1) is a non-empty bounded open set with a smooth boundary ∂Ω, p i > N for i = 1, ..., n, Δ p i u i = div ( u i p i - 2 u i ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq1_HTML.gif is the p i -Laplacian operator, a i L (Ω) with ess infΩ a i > 0 for i = 1, ..., n, λ > 0, and F: Ω × n is a function such that the mapping (t1, t2,..., t n ) → F (x, t1, t2,..., t n ) is in C1 in n for all x Ω , F t i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq2_HTML.gif is continuous in Ω × n for i = 1,..., n, and F (x, 0,..., 0) = 0 for all x Ω and ν is the outward unit normal to ∂Ω. Here, F t i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq3_HTML.gif denotes the partial derivative of F with respect to t i .

Precisely, under appropriate hypotheses on the behavior of the nonlinear term F at infinity, the existence of an interval Λ such that, for each λ Λ, the system (1) admits a sequence of pairwise distinct weak solutions is proved; (see Theorem 3.1). We use a variational argument due to Ricceri which provides certain alternatives in order to find sequences of distinct critical points of parameter-depending functionals. We emphasize that no symmetry assumption is required on the nonlinear term F (thus, the symmetry version of the Mountain Pass theorem cannot be applied). Instead of such a symmetry, we assume a suitable oscillatory behavior at infinity on the function F.

We recall that a weak solution of the system (1) is any u = u 1 , . . . , u n W 1 , p 1 Ω × . . . × W 1 , p n Ω , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq4_HTML.gif such that
Ω i = 1 n u i ( x ) p i - 2 u i ( x ) v i ( x ) + a i ( x ) u i ( x ) p i - 2 u i ( x ) v i ( x ) d x - λ Ω i = 1 n F u i ( x , u 1 ( x ) , . . . u n ( x ) ) v i ( x ) d x = 0 https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equa_HTML.gif

for all v = v 1 , . . . , v n W 1 , p 1 Ω × . . . × W 1 , p n Ω . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq5_HTML.gif

For a discussion about the existence of infinitely many solutions for differential equations, using Ricceri's variational principle [1]and its variants [2, 3] we refer the reader to the articles [416].

For other basic definitions and notations we refer the reader to the articles [1722]. Here, our motivation comes from the recent article [8]. We point out that strategy of the proof of the main result and Example 3.1 are strictly related to the results and example contained in [8].

2 Preliminaries

Our main tool to ensure the existence of infinitely many classical solutions for Dirichlet quasilinear two-point boundary value systems is the celebrated Ricceri's variational principle [[1], Theorem 2.5] that we now recall as follows:

Theorem 2.1. Let X be a reflexive real Banach space, let Φ, Ψ: X be two Gâteaux differentiable functionals such that Φ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, strongly continuous, and coercive and Ψ is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous. For every r > inf X Φ, let us put
φ ( r ) : = inf u Φ - 1 - , r sup v Φ - 1 - , r Ψ ( v ) - Ψ ( u ) r - Φ ( u ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equb_HTML.gif
and
γ : = lim inf r + φ ( r ) , δ : = lim inf r ( inf X Φ ) + φ ( r ) . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equc_HTML.gif

Then, one has

(a) for every r > inf X Φ and every λ 0 , 1 φ ( r ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq6_HTML.gif, the restriction of the functional I λ = Φ - λ Ψ to Φ-1(] - ∞, r[) admits a global minimum, which is a critical point (local minimum) of I λ in X.

(b) If γ < +∞ then, for each λ 0 , 1 γ https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq7_HTML.gif, the following alternative holds:

either

(b1) I λ possesses a global minimum,

or

(b2) there is a sequence {u n } of critical points (local minima) of I λ such that
lim n + Φ ( u n ) = + . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equd_HTML.gif

(c) If δ < +∞ then, for each λ 0 , 1 δ https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq8_HTML.gif, the following alternative holds:

either

(c1) there is a global minimum of Φ which is a local minimum of I λ ,

or

(c2) there is a sequence {u n } of pairwise distinct critical points (local minima) of I λ that converges weakly to a global minimum of Φ.

We let X be the Cartesian product of n Sobolev spaces W 1 , p 1 ( Ω ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq9_HTML.gif, W 1 , p 2 ( Ω ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq10_HTML.gif,... and W 1 , p n ( Ω ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq11_HTML.gif, i.e., X = i = 1 n W 1 , p i ( Ω ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq12_HTML.gif, equipped with the norm
u 1 , u 2 , , u n = i = 1 n u i p i , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Eque_HTML.gif
where
u i p i = Ω u i ( x ) p i + a i ( x ) u i ( x ) p i d x 1 p i , i = 1 , , n . C = max sup u i W 1 , p i ( Ω ) \ { 0 } sup x Ω u ( x ) p i u i p i p i ; i = 1 , , n . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ2_HTML.gif
(2)
Since p i > N for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, one has C < +∞. In addition, if Ω is convex, it is known [23] that
sup u i W 1 , p i ( Ω ) \ { 0 } sup x Ω u i ( x ) u i p i 2 p i - 1 p i max 1 a i 1 1 p i ; diam ( Ω ) N 1 p i p i - 1 p i - N m ( Ω ) p i - 1 p i a i a i 1 https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equf_HTML.gif

for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, where ||·||1 = ∫Ω|·(x)| dx, ||·|| = supxΩ|·(x)| and m(Ω) is the Lebesgue measure of the set Ω, and equality occurs when Ω is a ball.

In the sequel, let p ¯ = min { p i ; 1 i n } https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq13_HTML.gif.

For all γ > 0 we define
K ( γ ) = ( t 1 , , t n ) n : i = 1 n t i γ . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ3_HTML.gif
(3)

3 Main results

We state our main result as follows:

Theorem 3.1. Assume that

(A1)
lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - < i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equg_HTML.gif

where K ( ξ ) = { ( t 1 , , t n ) | i = 1 n t i ξ } https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq14_HTML.gif (see (3)).

Then, for each
λ Λ : = 1 lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n | | a i | | 1 | t i | p i , i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equh_HTML.gif

the system (1) has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions in X.

Proof. Define the functionals Φ, Ψ: X for each u = (u1, ..., u n ) X, as follows
Φ ( u ) = i = 1 n u i p i p i p i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equi_HTML.gif
and
Ψ ( u ) = Ω F ( x , u 1 ( x ) , , u n ( x ) ) d x . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equj_HTML.gif
It is well known that Ψ is a Gâteaux differentiable functional and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous whose Gâteaux derivative at the point u X is the functional Ψ'(u) X*, given by
Ψ ( u ) ( v ) = Ω i = 1 n F u i ( x , u 1 ( x ) , , u n ( x ) ) v i ( x ) d x https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equk_HTML.gif
for every v = (v1, ..., v n ) X, and Ψ': XX* is a compact operator. Moreover, Φ is a sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous and Gâteaux differentiable functional whose Gâteaux derivative at the point u X is the functional Φ' (u) X*, given by
Φ ( u 1 , , u n ) ( v 1 , , v n ) Ω i = 1 n u i ( x ) p i - 2 u i ( x ) v i ( x ) + a i ( x ) u i ( x ) p i - 2 u i ( x ) v i ( x ) d x https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equl_HTML.gif

for every v = (v1, ..., v n ) X. Furthermore, (Φ')-1: X*X exists and is continuous.

Put I λ : = Φ - λ Ψ. Clearly, the weak solutions of the system (1) are exactly the solutions of the equation I λ ( u 1 , , u n ) = 0 https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq15_HTML.gif. Now, we want to show that
γ < + . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equm_HTML.gif
Let {ξ m } be a real sequence such that ξ m → +∞ as m → ∞ and
lim m Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ m ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ m p - = lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equn_HTML.gif
Put r m = ξ m p - i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq16_HTML.gif for all m . Since
sup x Ω u i ( x ) p i C u i p i p i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equo_HTML.gif
for each u i W 1 , p i ( Ω ) https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq17_HTML.gif for 1 ≤ in, we have
sup x Ω i = 1 n u i ( x ) p i p i C i = 1 n u i p i p i p i . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ4_HTML.gif
(4)
for each u = (u1, u2, ..., u n ) X. This, for each r > 0, together with (4), ensures that
Φ - 1 - , r u X ; sup i = 1 n u i ( x ) p i p i C r for each x Ω . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equp_HTML.gif
Hence, an easy computation shows that i = 1 n u i ξ m https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq18_HTML.gif whenever u = (u1, ..., u n ) Φ-1(] - ∞, r m ]). Hence, one has
φ ( r m ) = inf u Φ - 1 - , r m ( sup v Φ - 1 - , r m Ψ ( v ) ) - Φ ( u ) r m - Φ ( u ) sup v Φ - 1 - , r m Ψ ( v ) r m Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ m ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ m p - i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equq_HTML.gif
Therefore, since from Assumption (A1) one has
lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - < , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equr_HTML.gif
we deduce
γ lim inf m + φ ( r m ) i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - < + . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ5_HTML.gif
(5)
Assumption (A1) along with (5), implies
Λ 0 , 1 γ . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equs_HTML.gif

Fix λ Λ. The inequality (5) concludes that the condition (b) of Theorem 2.1 can be applied and either I λ has a global minimum or there exists a sequence {u m } where u m = (u1m, ..., u nm ) of weak solutions of the system (1) such that limm→∞||(u1m, ..., u nm )|| = +.

Now fix λ Λ and let us verify that the functional I λ is unbounded from below. Arguing as in [8], consider n positive real sequences { d i , m } i = 1 n https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq19_HTML.gif such that i = 1 n d i , m 2 + https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq20_HTML.gif as m

and
lim m + Ω F ( x , d 1 , m , , d n , m ) d x i = 1 n d i , m p i p i = lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ6_HTML.gif
(6)
For all m define w m (x) = (d1, m, ..., dn, m). For any fixed m , w m X and, in particular, one has
Φ ( w m ) = i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equt_HTML.gif
Then, for all m ,
I λ ( w m ) = Φ ( w m ) - λ Ψ ( w m ) = i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i - λ Ω F ( x , d 1 , m , , d n , m ) d x . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equu_HTML.gif
Now, if
lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 | t i | p i p i < , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equv_HTML.gif
we fix ε 1 λ lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i , 1 https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq21_HTML.gif. From (6) there exists τ ε such that
Ω F ( x , d 1 , m , , d n , m ) d x > ε lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i m > τ ε , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equw_HTML.gif
therefore
I λ ( w m ) 1 - λ ε lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i m > τ ε , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equx_HTML.gif
and by the choice of ε, one has
lim m + [ Φ ( w m ) - λ Ψ ( w m ) ] = - . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equy_HTML.gif
If
lim sup ξ + Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i = , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equz_HTML.gif
let us consider K > 1 λ https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq22_HTML.gif. From (6) there exists τ K such that
Ω F ( x , d 1 , m , , d n , m ) d x > K i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i m > τ K , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equaa_HTML.gif
therefore
I λ ( w m ) ( 1 - λ K ) i = 1 n d i , m p i a i 1 p i m > τ K , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equab_HTML.gif
and by the choice of K, one has
lim m + [ Φ ( w m ) - λ Ψ ( w m ) ] = - . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equac_HTML.gif
Hence, our claim is proved. Since all assumptions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied, the functional I λ admits a sequence {u m = (u1m, ..., u nm )} X of critical points such that
lim m ( u 1 m , , u n m ) = + , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equad_HTML.gif

and we have the conclusion.   □

Here, we give a consequence of Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.2. Assume that

(A2) lim inf ξ + Ω sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x ξ p - < i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - ; https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq23_HTML.gif

(A3) lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n Ω F ( x , t 1 , , t n ) d x i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i > 1 . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq24_HTML.gif

Then, the system
- Δ p i u i + a i ( x ) u i p i - 2 u = F u i ( x , u 1 , , u n ) i n Ω , u i ν = 0 o n Ω https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equae_HTML.gif

for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, has an unbounded sequence of classical solutions in X.

Now, we want to present the analogous version of the main result (Theorem 3.1) in the autonomous case.

Theorem 3.3. Assume that

(A4)
lim inf ξ + sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( t 1 , , t n ) ξ p - < i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n F ( t 1 , , t n ) i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i p i https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equaf_HTML.gif

where K ( ξ ) = { ( t 1 , , t n ) | i = 1 n t i ξ } https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_IEq25_HTML.gif (see (3)).

Then, for each
λ Λ : = 1 F ( t 1 , , t n ) lim sup ( t 1 , , t n ) ( t 1 , , t n ) + n i = 1 n a i 1 t i p i , i = 1 n ( p i C ) 1 p i p - lim inf ξ + sup ( t 1 , , t n ) K ( ξ ) F ( t 1 , , t n ) ξ p - https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equag_HTML.gif
the system
- Δ p i u i + a i ( x ) u i p i - 2 u = λ F u i ( u 1 , , u n ) i n Ω , u i ν = 0 o n Ω https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equah_HTML.gif

has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions in X.

Proof. Set F (x, u1, ..., u n ) = F (u1, ..., u n ) for all x Ω and (u1, ..., u n ) n . The conclusion follows from Theorem 3.1. □

Remark 3.1. We observe in Theorem 3.1 we can replace ξ → +∞ and (t1, ..., t n ) → (+, ..., +∞) with ξ → 0+ (t1, ..., t n ) → (0+, ..., 0+), respectively, that by the same way as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 but using conclusion (c) of Theorem 2.1 instead of (b), the system (1) has a sequence of weak solutions, which strongly converges to 0 in X.

Finally, we give an example to illustrate the result.

Example 3.1. Let Ω 2 be a non-empty bounded open set with a smooth boundary ϑΩ and consider the increasing sequence of positive real numbers given by
a n : = 2 , a n + 1 : = n ! ( a n ) 5 4 + 2 https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equai_HTML.gif
for every n ≥ 1. Define the function
F ( t 1 , t 2 ) = ( a n + 1 ) 5 e - 1 1 - [ ( t 1 - a n + 1 ) 2 + ( t 2 - a n + 1 ) 2 ] ( t 1 , t 2 ) n 1 B ( ( a n + 1 , a n + 1 ) , 1 ) , 0 otherwise https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equ7_HTML.gif
(7)

where B((an+1, an+1), 1)) be the open unit ball of center (an+1, an+1). We observe that the function F is non-negative, F (0, 0) = 0, and F C1(2). We will denote by f and g, respectively, the partial derivative of F respect to t1 and t2. For every n , the restriction F on B((an+1, an+1), 1) attains its maximum in (an+1, an+1) and F (an+1, an+1) = (an+1)5,

then
lim sup n + F ( a n + 1 , a n + 1 ) a n + 1 3 3 + a n + 1 4 4 = + https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equaj_HTML.gif
So
lim sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) ( + , + ) F ( t 1 , t 2 ) t 1 3 3 + t 2 4 4 = + https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equak_HTML.gif
On the other by setting y n = an+1- 1 for every n , one has
sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) K ( y n ) F ( t 1 , t 2 ) = a n 5 n https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equal_HTML.gif
Then
lim n sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) K ( y n ) F ( t 1 , t 2 ) ( a n + 1 - 1 ) 3 = 0 , https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equam_HTML.gif
and hence
lim inf ξ sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) K ( ξ ) F ( t 1 , t 2 ) ξ 3 = 0 . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equan_HTML.gif
Finally
0 = lim inf ξ + sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) K ( ξ ) F ( t 1 , t 2 ) ξ 3 < ( ( 3 C ) 1 3 + ( 4 C ) 1 4 ) 3 lim sup ( t 1 , t 2 ) ( + , + ) ( t 1 , t 2 ) + n F ( t 1 , t 2 ) t 1 3 3 + t 2 4 4 = + . https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equao_HTML.gif
So, since all assumptions of Theorem 3.3 is applicable to the system
- Δ 3 u + u u = λ f ( u , v ) in Ω , - Δ 4 v + v 2 g = λ g ( u , v ) in Ω , u ν = v ν = 0 on Ω https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1687-2770-2012-54/MediaObjects/13661_2012_Article_144_Equap_HTML.gif

for every λ [0, +[.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU)
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Mazandaran

References

  1. Ricceri B: A general variational principle and some of its applications. J Comput Appl Math 2000, 113: 401-410. 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1MathSciNetView Article
  2. Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: Infinitely many solutions for a boundary value problem with discontinuous nonlinearities. Bound Value Probl 2009, 2009: 1-20.MathSciNetView Article
  3. Marano S, Motreanu D: Infinitely many critical points of non-differentiable functions and applications to the Neumann-type problem involving the p -Laplacian. J Diff Equ 2002, 182: 108-120. 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4092MathSciNetView Article
  4. Bonanno G, D'Aguì G: On the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian. J Math Anal Appl 2009, 358: 223-228. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.04.055MathSciNetView Article
  5. Bonanno G, Di Bella B: Infinitely many solutions for a fourth-order elastic beam equation. Nonlinear Diff Equ Appl NoDEA 2011, 18: 357-368. 10.1007/s00030-011-0099-0MathSciNetView Article
  6. Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: A remark on perturbed elliptic Neumann problems. Studia Univ "Babeş-Bolyai", Mathematica 2010., LV(4):
  7. Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving the p -Laplacian. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh 2010, 140A: 737-752.MathSciNetView Article
  8. Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G, O'Regan D: Infinitely many weak solutions for a class of quasilinear elliptic systems. Math Comput Model 2010, 52: 152-160. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.004MathSciNetView Article
  9. Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G, Rădulescu V: Infinitely many solutions for a class of nonlinear eigenvalue problems in Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. C R Acad Sci Paris, Ser I 2011, 349: 263-268. 10.1016/j.crma.2011.02.009View Article
  10. Candito P: Infinitely many solutions to the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian and with discontinuous nonlinearities. Proc Edin Math Soc 2002, 45: 397-409.MathSciNetView Article
  11. Candito P, Livrea R: Infinitely many solutions for a nonlinear Navier boundary value problem involving the p -biharmonic. Studia Univ "Babeş-Bolyai", Mathematica 2010., LV(4):
  12. Dai G: Infinitely many solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p ( x )-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 2297-2305. 10.1016/j.na.2008.03.009MathSciNetView Article
  13. Fan X, Ji C: Existence of infinitely many solutions for a Neumann problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. J Math Anal Appl 2007, 334: 248-260. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.12.055MathSciNetView Article
  14. Kristály A: Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in N . J Diff Equ 2006, 220: 511-530. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.02.007View Article
  15. Li C: The existence of infinitely many solutions of a class of nonlinear elliptic equations with a Neumann boundary conditions for both resonance and oscillation problems. Nonlinear Anal 2003, 54: 431-443. 10.1016/S0362-546X(03)00100-7MathSciNetView Article
  16. Ricceri B: Infinitely many solutions of the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian. Bull Lond Math Soc 2001, 33(3):331-340. 10.1017/S0024609301008001MathSciNetView Article
  17. Afrouzi GA, Heidarkhani S: Existence of three solutions for a class of Dirichlet quasi-linear elliptic systems involving the ( p1, ..., p n )-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 135-143. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.038MathSciNetView Article
  18. Afrouzi GA, Heidarkhani S, O'Regan D: Three solutions to a class of Neumann doubly eigenvalue elliptic systems driven by a ( p1, ..., p n )-Laplacian. Bull Korean Math Soc 2010, 47(6):1235-1250. 10.4134/BKMS.2010.47.6.1235MathSciNetView Article
  19. Bonanno G, Heidarkhani S, O'Regan D: Multiple solutions for a class of Dirichlet quasilinear elliptic systems driven by a (p, q)-Laplacian operator. Dyn Syst Appl 2011, 20: 89-100.MathSciNet
  20. Heidarkhani S, Tian Y: Multiplicity results for a class of gradient systems depending on two parameters. Nonlinear Anal 2010, 73: 547-554. 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.051MathSciNetView Article
  21. Heidarkhani S, Tian Y: Three solutions for a class of gradient Kirchhoff-type systems depending on two parameters. Dyn Syst Appl 2011, 20: 551-562.MathSciNet
  22. Zeidler E: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications. Volume II. Springer, New York; 1985.View Article
  23. Bonanno G, Candito P: Three solutions to a Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p-Laplacian. Arch Math (Basel) 2003, 80: 424-429.MathSciNet

Copyright

© Shoorabi and Afrouzi; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.