Existence results for classes of infinite semipositone problems
© Goddard II et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 23 October 2012
Accepted: 5 April 2013
Published: 19 April 2013
We consider the problem
where , , Ω is a smooth bounded domain in , , , , and . Given a, b, γ and α, we establish the existence of a positive solution for small values of c. These results are also extended to corresponding exterior domain problems. Also, a bifurcation result for the case is presented.
where Ω is a smooth bounded domain in , , , , is the Laplacian of u and is a function satisfying for , , and for . Existence of positive solutions of problem (1) was studied in . In particular, it was proved that given an and there exists a such that for (1) has positive solutions. Here, is the first eigenvalue of −Δ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Nonexistence of a positive solution was also proved when . Later in , these results were extended to the case of the p-Laplacian operator, , where , . Boundary value problems of the form (1) are known as semipositone problems since the nonlinearity satisfies for some . See [3–9] for some existence results for semipositone problems.
where , , Ω is a smooth bounded domain in , , , , , , and . In the literature, problems of the form (2) are referred to as infinite semipositone problems as the nonlinearity satisfies . One can refer to [10–14], and [15–17] for some recent existence results of infinite semipositone problems. We establish the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1 Given , , and , there exists a constant such that for , (2) has a positive solution.
Remark 1.1 In the nonsingular case (), positive solutions exist only when (the principal eigenvalue) (see [1, 2]). But in the singular case, we establish the existence of a positive solution for any given .
where . We assume:
() and satisfies for , and for some θ such that .
We note that if then is nonsingular at 0 and . In this case, problem (4) can be studied using ideas in the proof of Theorem 1.1. Hence, our focus is on the case when in which, h may be singular at 0. Note that in this case .
Remark 1.2 Note that since .
We then establish the following theorem.
Theorem 1.2 Given , , , and assume () holds. Then there exists a constant such that for , (3) has a positive radial solution.
where Ω is a smooth bounded domain in , a is a positive parameter, , and . We prove the following.
where . The following lemma was established in .
Let ψ be a subsolution of (2) and Z be a supersolution of (2) such that in Ω. Then (2) has a solution u such that in Ω.
Finding a positive subsolution, ψ, for such infinite semipositone problems is quite challenging since we need to construct ψ in such a way that and in a large part of the interior. In this paper, we achieve this by constructing subsolutions of the form , where k is an appropriate positive constant, and is the eigenfunction corresponding to the first eigenvalue of in Ω, on ∂ Ω.
In Sections 2, 3, and 4, we provide proofs of our results. Section 5 is concerned with providing some exact bifurcation diagrams of positive solutions of (2) when and .
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
From (11), (12) and (13) we see that equation (7) holds in Ω, if . Next, we construct a supersolution. Let e be the solution of in on ∂ Ω. Choose such that and . Define . Then Z is a supersolution of (2). Thus, Theorem 1.1 is proven.
3 Proof of Theorem 1.2
Proving (18) holds in is straightforward since h is not singular at . Thus, from equations (19), (20) and (21), we see that (15) holds in . Hence, ψ is a subsolution. Let where e satisfies in , and is such that and . Then Z is a supersolution of (4) and there exists a solution u of (4) such that . Thus, Theorem 1.2 is proven.
4 Proof of Theorem 1.3
Thus, ψ is a subsolution. It is easy to see that is a supersolution of (6). Since k, can be chosen small enough, . Thus, (6) has a positive solution for every . Also, all positive solutions are bounded above by Z. Hence, when a is close to 0, every positive solution of (6) approaches 0. Also, is a solution for every a. This implies we have a branch of positive solutions bifurcating from the trivial branch of solutions at .
5 Numerical results
EK Lee was supported by 2-year Research Grant of Pusan National University.
- Oruganti S, Shi J, Shivaji R: Diffusive logistic equation with constant harvesting, I: steady states. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 354(9):3601-3619. 10.1090/S0002-9947-02-03005-2MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oruganti S, Shi J, Shivaji R: Logistic equation with the p -Laplacian and constant yield harvesting. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2004, 9: 723-727.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ambrosetti A, Arcoya D, Biffoni B: Positive solutions for some semipositone problems via bifurcation theory. Differ. Integral Equ. 1994, 7: 655-663.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Anuradha V, Hai DD, Shivaji R: Existence results for superlinear semipositone boundary value problems. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1996, 124(3):757-763. 10.1090/S0002-9939-96-03256-XMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arcoya D, Zertiti A: Existence and nonexistence of radially symmetric nonnegative solutions for a class of semipositone problems in an annulus. Rend. Mat. Appl. 1994, 14: 625-646.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Castro A, Garner JB, Shivaji R: Existence results for classes of sublinear semipositone problems. Results Math. 1993, 23: 214-220. 10.1007/BF03322297MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castro A, Shivaji R: Nonnegative solutions for a class of nonpositone problems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 1998, 108(A):291-302.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Castro A, Shivaji R: Nonnegative solutions for a class of radially symmetric nonpositone problems. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1989, 106(3):735-740.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Castro A, Shivaji R: Positive solutions for a concave semipositone Dirichlet problem. Nonlinear Anal. 1998, 31: 91-98. 10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00189-7MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghergu M, Radulescu V: Sublinear singular elliptic problems with two parameters. J. Differ. Equ. 2003, 195: 520-536. 10.1016/S0022-0396(03)00105-0MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hai DD, Sankar L, Shivaji R: Infinite semipositone problems with asymptotically linear growth forcing terms. Differ. Integral Equ. 2012, 25(11-12):1175-1188.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez J, Mancebo FJ, Vega JM: Positive solutions for singular nonlinear elliptic equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 2007, 137A: 41-62.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lee E, Shivaji R, Ye J: Classes of infinite semipositone systems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 2009, 139(A):853-865.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee E, Shivaji R, Ye J: Positive solutions for elliptic equations involving nonlinearities with falling zeros. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 846-851. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.08.020MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramaswamy M, Shivaji R, Ye J: Positive solutions for a class of infinite semipositone problems. Differ. Integral Equ. 2007, 20(11):1423-1433.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Shi J, Yao M: On a singular nonlinear semilinear elliptic problem. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 1998, 128A: 1389-1401.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z: On a Dirichlet problem with a singular nonlinearity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1995, 194: 103-113. 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1288MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cui S: Existence and nonexistence of positive solutions for singular semilinear elliptic boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2000, 41: 149-176. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00271-5MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laetsch T: The number of solutions of a nonlinear two point boundary value problem. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1970, 20: 1-13. 10.1512/iumj.1970.20.20001MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar