# Approximate solutions for MHD squeezing fluid flow by a novel method

- Mustafa Inc
^{1}and - Ali Akgül
^{2, 3}Email author

**2014**:18

**DOI: **10.1186/1687-2770-2014-18

© Inc and Akgül; licensee Springer. 2014

**Received: **5 October 2013

**Accepted: **10 December 2013

**Published: **16 January 2014

## Abstract

In this paper, a steady axisymmetric MHD flow of two-dimensional incompressible fluids has been investigated. The reproducing kernel Hilbert space method (RKHSM) has been implemented to obtain a solution of the reduced fourth-order nonlinear boundary value problem. Numerical results have been compared with the results obtained by the Runge-Kutta method (RK-4) and optimal homotopy asymptotic method (OHAM).

**MSC:** 46E22, 35A24.

### Keywords

reproducing kernel method series solutions squeezing fluid flow magnetohydrodynamics reproducing kernel space## 1 Introduction

Squeezing flows have many applications in food industry, principally in chemical engineering [1–4]. Some practical examples of squeezing flow include polymer processing, compression and injection molding. Grimm [5] studied numerically the thin Newtonian liquids films being squeezed between two plates. Squeezing flow coupled with magnetic field is widely applied to bearing with liquid-metal lubrication [2, 6–8].

In this paper, we use RKHSM to study the squeezing MHD fluid flow between two infinite planar plates. This problem has been solved by RKHSM and for comparison it has been compared with the OHAM and numerically with the RK-4 by using Maple 16.

The RKHSM, which accurately computes the series solution, is of great interest to applied sciences. The method provides the solution in a rapidly convergent series with components that can be elegantly computed. The efficiency of the method was used by many authors to investigate several scientific applications. Geng and Cui [9] and Zhou *et al.* [10] applied the RKHSM to handle the second-order boundary value problems. Yao and Cui [11] and Wang *et al.* [12] investigated a class of singular boundary value problems by this method and the obtained results were good. Wang and Chao [13], Li and Cui [14], Zhou and Cui [15] independently employed the RKSHSM to variable-coefficient partial differential equations. Du and Cui [16] investigated the approximate solution of the forced Duffing equation with integral boundary conditions by combining the homotopy perturbation method and the RKM. Lv and Cui [17] presented a new algorithm to solve linear fifth-order boundary value problems. Cui and Du [18] obtained the representation of the exact solution for the nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integral equations by using the RKHSM. Wu and Li [19] applied iterative RKHSM to obtain the analytical approximate solution of a nonlinear oscillator with discontinuities. For more details about RKHSM and the modified forms and its effectiveness, see [9–37] and the references therein.

The paper is organized as follows. We give the problem formulation in Section 2. Section 3 introduces several reproducing kernel spaces. A bounded linear operator is presented in Section 4. In Section 5, we provide the main results, the exact and approximate solutions. An iterative method is developed for the kind of problems in the reproducing kernel space. We prove that the approximate solution converges to the exact solution uniformly. Some numerical experiments are illustrated in Section 6. There are some conclusions in the last section.

## 2 Problem formulation

*ρ*and viscosity

*μ*squeezed between two large planar parallel plates separated by a small distance 2

*H*and the plates approaching each other with a low constant velocity

*V*, as illustrated in Figure 1, and the flow can be assumed to quasi-steady [1–3, 39]. The Navier-Stokes equations [3, 4] governing such flow in the presence of magnetic field, when inertial terms are retained in the flow, are given as [38]

*u*is the velocity vector, ∇ denotes the material time derivative,

*T*is the Cauchy stress tensor,

*J*is the electric current density,

*B*is the total magnetic field and

*b*denotes the induced magnetic field. In the absence of displacement currents, the modified Ohm law and Maxwell’s equations (see [40] and the references therein) are given by [38]

*σ*is the electrical conductivity,

*E*is the electric field and ${\mu}_{m}$ is the magnetic permeability.

- (a)
The density

*ρ*, magnetic permeability ${\mu}_{m}$ and electric field conductivity*σ*are assumed to be constant throughout the flow field region. - (b)
The electrical conductivity

*σ*of the fluid is considered to be finite. - (c)
Total magnetic field

*B*is perpendicular to the velocity field*V*and the induced magnetic field*b*is negligible compared with the applied magnetic field ${B}_{0}$ so that the magnetic Reynolds number is small (see [40] and the references therein). - (d)
We assume a situation where no energy is added or extracted from the fluid by the electric field, which implies that there is no electric field present in the fluid flow region.

*r*,

*θ*,

*z*with

*z*-axis perpendicular to plates and $z=\pm H$ at the plates. Since we have axial symmetry,

*u*is represented by

*p*is the pressure, and the equation of continuity is given by [38]

where Re is the Reynolds number and *m* is the Hartmann number.

## 3 Reproducing kernel spaces

In this section, we define some useful reproducing kernel spaces.

**Definition 3.1** (Reproducing kernel)

*E*be a nonempty abstract set. A function $K:E\times E\u27f6C$ is a reproducing kernel of the Hilbert space

*H*if and only if

The last condition is called ‘the reproducing property’: the value of the function *φ* at the point *t* is reproduced by the inner product of *φ* with $K(\cdot ,t)$.

**Definition 3.2**We define the space ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$ by

*u*exists almost everywhere since ${u}^{(4)}$ is absolutely continuous. The inner product and the norm in ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$ are defined respectively by

*i.e.*, for each fixed $y\in [0,1]$ and any $u\in {W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$, there exists a function ${R}_{y}$ such that

**Definition 3.3**We define the space ${W}_{2}^{4}[0,1]$ by

*u*exists almost everywhere since ${u}^{(3)}$ is absolutely continuous. The inner product and the norm in ${W}_{2}^{4}[0,1]$ are defined respectively by

*i.e.*, for each fixed $y\in [0,1]$ and any $u\in {W}_{2}^{4}[0,1]$, there exists a function ${r}_{y}$ such that

**Theorem 3.1**

*The space*${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$

*is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space whose reproducing kernel function is given by*

*where* ${c}_{i}(y)$ *and* ${d}_{i}(y)$ *can be obtained easily by using Maple* 16 *and the proof of Theorem * 3.1 *is given in Appendix*.

**Remark 3.1**The reproducing kernel function ${r}_{y}$ of ${W}_{2}^{4}[0,1]$ is given as

This can be proved easily as the proof of Theorem 3.1.

## 4 Bounded linear operator in ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$

In this section, the solution of Eq. (2.17) is given in the reproducing kernel space ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$.

**Theorem 4.1** *The operator* *L* *defined by* (4.1) *is a bounded linear operator*.

*Proof*We only need to prove

*P*is a positive constant. By Definition 3.3, we have

where $P=({a}_{1}^{2}+{a}_{2}^{2}+{a}_{3}^{2}+{a}_{4}^{2}+{a}_{5}^{2})>0$ is a positive constant. This completes the proof. □

## 5 Analysis of the solution of (2.17)-(2.18)

*L*and ${r}_{x}$ is given by Remark 3.1. Furthermore

**Lemma 5.1** ${\{{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{i}(x)\}}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}$ *is a complete system of* ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$.

*Proof*For $u\in {W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$, let

Note that ${\{{x}_{i}\}}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}$ is the dense set in $[0,1]$. Therefore $(Lu)(x)=0$. Assume that (4.1) has a unique solution. Then *L* is one-to-one on ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$ and thus $u(x)=0$. This completes the proof. □

**Lemma 5.2**

*The following formula holds*:

*where the subscript* *η* *of the operator* ${L}_{\eta}$ *indicates that the operator* *L* *applies to a function of* *η*.

*Proof*

This completes the proof. □

**Remark 5.1**The orthonormal system ${\{{\overline{\mathrm{\Psi}}}_{i}(x)\}}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}$ of ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$ can be derived from the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process of ${\{{\mathrm{\Psi}}_{i}(x)\}}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}$ as

where ${\beta}_{ik}$ are orthogonal coefficients.

In the following, we give the representation of the exact solution of Eq. (2.17) in the reproducing kernel space ${W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$.

**Theorem 5.1**

*If*

*u*

*is the exact solution of*(4.1),

*then*

*where* ${\{{x}_{i}\}}_{i=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}$ *is a dense set in* $[0,1]$.

*Proof*From (5.1) and the uniqueness of solution of (4.1), we have

This completes the proof. □

*n*-term of the exact solution

*u*as

**Lemma 5.3** ([30])

*Assume that* *u* *is the solution of* (4.1) *and* ${r}_{n}$ *is the error between the approximate solution* ${u}_{n}$ *and the exact solution* *u*. *Then the error sequence* ${r}_{n}$ *is monotone decreasing in the sense of* ${\parallel \cdot \parallel}_{{W}_{2}^{5}}$ *and* ${\parallel {r}_{n}(x)\parallel}_{{W}_{2}^{5}}\to 0$.

## 6 Numerical results

*m*. All computations are performed by Maple 16. Figure 5.7 shows comparisons of $F(z)$ for a fixed Reynolds number with increasing magnetic field effect $m=1,3,8,20$. From this figure, the velocity decreases due to an increase in

*m*. Figure 5.8 shows comparisons of $F(z)$ for a fixed magnetic field $m=1$ with increasing Reynolds numbers $Re=1,4,10$. It is observed that much increase in Reynolds numbers affects the results. The RKHSM does not require discretization of the variables,

*i.e.*, time and space, it is not affected by computation round of errors and one is not faced with necessity of large computer memory and time. The accuracy of the RKHSM for the MHD squeezing fluid flow is controllable and absolute errors are small with present choice of

*x*(see Tables 1-6 and Figures 2-7). The numerical results we obtained justify the advantage of this methodology. Generally it is not possible to find the exact solution of these problems.

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.150265 | 0.150294 | 0.15029400074386619072 | 7.43 × 10 | 4.94 × 10 | 2.948 |

0.2 | 0.297424 | 0.297481 | 0.29748099943286204844 | 5.67 × 10 | 1.9 × 10 | 2.980 |

0.3 | 0.438387 | 0.438467 | 0.43846699936146542481 | 6.38 × 10 | 1.45 × 10 | 2.870 |

0.4 | 0.570093 | 0.570189 | 0.57018899983086605298 | 1.69 × 10 | 2.96 × 10 | 2.792 |

0.5 | 0.68952 | 0.689624 | 0.68962399932753349664 | 6.72 × 10 | 9.75 × 10 | 2.824 |

0.6 | 0.793695 | 0.793796 | 0.79379600052975674440 | 5.29 × 10 | 6.67 × 10 | 2.902 |

0.7 | 0.879695 | 0.879779 | 0.87977900034152532706 | 3.41 × 10 | 3.88 × 10 | 2.964 |

0.8 | 0.944641 | 0.944696 | 0.94469600021478585921 | 2.14 × 10 | 2.27 × 10 | 2.808 |

0.9 | 0.985687 | 0.985707 | 0.98570699945336089741 | 5.46 × 10 | 5.54 × 10 | 2.761 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{3}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.13709 | 0.137044 | 0.13704399924397146430 | 7.56 × 10 | 5.51 × 10 | 3.261 |

0.2 | 0.272583 | 0.272494 | 0.27249400041809657591 | 4.18 × 10 | 1.53 × 10 | 3.542 |

0.3 | 0.404759 | 0.404637 | 0.40463699937791012358 | 6.22 × 10 | 1.53 × 10 | 2.949 |

0.4 | 0.531649 | 0.531508 | 0.53150799980699743080 | 1.93 × 10 | 3.63 × 10 | 3.541 |

0.5 | 0.650894 | 0.650756 | 0.65075599905912100256 | 9.4 × 10 | 1.44 × 10 | 3.089 |

0.6 | 0.759591 | 0.759478 | 0.75947799979255971384 | 2.07 × 10 | 2.73 × 10 | 2.996 |

0.7 | 0.854106 | 0.854035 | 0.85403499924057783299 | 7.59 × 10 | 8.89 × 10 | 3.026 |

0.8 | 0.929845 | 0.929817 | 0.92981700082221438640 | 8.22 × 10 | 8.84 × 10 | 7.582 |

0.9 | 0.980966 | 0.980963 | 0.98096299961587653980 | 3.84 × 10 | 3.91 × 10 | 3.291 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{8}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.11507 | 0.114976 | 0.11497599095960418967 | 9.04 × 10 | 7.86 × 10 | 4.290 |

0.2 | 0.230068 | 0.229882 | 0.22988199268533318687 | 7.31 × 10 | 3.18 × 10 | 4.134 |

0.3 | 0.344866 | 0.344604 | 0.34460400584434350472 | 5.84 × 10 | 1.69 × 10 | 4.477 |

0.4 | 0.459205 | 0.458904 | 0.45890399132822355411 | 8.67 × 10 | 1.88 × 10 | 4.275 |

0.5 | 0.572545 | 0.572276 | 0.5722759999680104400 | 3.19 × 10 | 5.58 × 10 | 3.931 |

0.6 | 0.683769 | 0.683628 | 0.68362799155831029523 | 8.44 × 10 | 1.23 × 10 | 4.556 |

0.7 | 0.790543 | 0.790607 | 0.79060700783664672119 | 7.83 × 10 | 9.91 × 10 | 4.461 |

0.8 | 0.887936 | 0.888173 | 0.88817300466724146312 | 4.66 × 10 | 5.25 × 10 | 3.885 |

0.9 | 0.965381 | 0.965578 | 0.96557800220185786369 | 2.2 × 10 | 2.28 × 10 | 5.007 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{20}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.105312 | 0.105391 | 0.10539098947593257979 | 1.05 × 10 | 9.98 × 10 | 4.134 |

0.2 | 0.210625 | 0.210782 | 0.2107819933190829 | 6.68 × 10 | 3.16 × 10 | 5.101 |

0.3 | 0.315938 | 0.316173 | 0.3161729190893567630 | 8.09 × 10 | 2.55 × 10 | 3.010 |

0.4 | 0.421249 | 0.421563 | 0.4215629919618786430 | 8.03 × 10 | 1.9 × 10 | 3.198 |

0.5 | 0.526551 | 0.526952 | 0.5269519479728988 | 5.2 × 10 | 9.87 × 10 | 3.042 |

0.6 | 0.631824 | 0.632324 | 0.632323981769674315 | 1.82 × 10 | 2.88 × 10 | 3.074 |

0.7 | 0.736971 | 0.737586 | 0.7375860570172070642 | 5.7 × 10 | 7.73 × 10 | 3.089 |

0.8 | 0.841352 | 0.842051 | 0.84205103495023398982 | 3.49 × 10 | 4.15 × 10 | 3.073 |

0.9 | 0.94035 | 0.940861 | 0.94086101815219431313 | 1.81 × 10 | 1.92 × 10 | 3.135 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{4}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.156218 | 0.158104 | 0.15810400012535311729 | 1.25 × 10 | 7.92 × 10 | 5.304 |

0.2 | 0.308363 | 0.311962 | 0.31196200057873017887 | 5.78 × 10 | 1.85 × 10 | 7.332 |

0.3 | 0.452557 | 0.457539 | 0.45753900003164153289 | 3.16 × 10 | 6.91 × 10 | 5.913 |

0.4 | 0.585287 | 0.591193 | 0.59119300033029000468 | 3.3 × 10 | 5.58 × 10 | 6.272 |

0.5 | 0.703518 | 0.709771 | 0.70977100026331200670 | 2.63 × 10 | 3.7 × 10 | 5.757 |

0.6 | 0.804726 | 0.810642 | 0.81064200064720692438 | 6.47 × 10 | 7.98 × 10 | 6.256 |

0.7 | 0.886838 | 0.891666 | 0.89166599939606220359 | 6.03 × 10 | 6.03 × 10 | 6.396 |

0.8 | 0.948051 | 0.95112 | 0.95112000044608660232 | 4.46 × 10 | 4.69 × 10 | 5.101 |

0.9 | 0.986529 | 0.987612 | 0.98761199979328069240 | 2.06 × 10 | 2.09 × 10 | 5.616 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

**Numerical results at**
$\mathit{m}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$
**and**
$\mathbf{Re}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{10}$

x | OHAM | Numerical solution (RK-4) | Approximate solution RKHSM | Absolute error | Relative error | Time (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.1 | 0.175911 | 0.167616 | 0.1676160001397322991 | 1.39 × 10 | 8.33 × 10 | 5.569 |

0.2 | 0.344336 | 0.329031 | 0.32903100221406728329 | 2.21 × 10 | 6.72 × 10 | 6.365 |

0.3 | 0.498671 | 0.478907 | 0.47890699791462877619 | 2.08 × 10 | 4.35 × 10 | 7.378 |

0.4 | 0.633941 | 0.613252 | 0.61325199550552162812 | 4.49 × 10 | 7.32 × 10 | 7.254 |

0.5 | 0.747277 | 0.729428 | 0.72942799845508679063 | 1.54 × 10 | 2.11 × 10 | 6.271 |

0.6 | 0.838004 | 0.825843 | 0.82584300690485584332 | 6.9 × 10 | 8.36 × 10 | 7.425 |

0.7 | 0.907244 | 0.901576 | 0.90157600840425340903 | 8.4 × 10 | 9.32 × 10 | 6.162 |

0.8 | 0.956954 | 0.901576 | 0.90157518382496567601 | 8.16 × 10 | 9.05 × 10 | 7.410 |

0.9 | 0.988387 | 0.988978 | 0.98897799997420425356 | 2.57 × 10 | 2.6 × 10 | 7.910 |

1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.902 |

## 7 Conclusion

In this paper, we introduced an algorithm for solving the MHD squeezing fluid flow. We applied a new powerful method RKHSM to the reduced nonlinear boundary value problem. The approximate solution obtained by the present method is uniformly convergent. Clearly, the series solution methodology can be applied to much more complicated nonlinear differential equations and boundary value problems. However, if the problem becomes nonlinear, then the RKHSM does not require discretization or perturbation and it does not make closure approximation. Results of numerical examples show that the present method is an accurate and reliable analytical method for this problem.

## Appendix

*Proof of Theorem 3.1*Let $u\in {W}_{2}^{5}[0,1]$. By Definition 3.2 we have

From (A.3)-(A.6), the unknown coefficients ${c}_{i}(y)$ and ${d}_{i}(y)$ ($i=1,2,\dots ,12$) can be obtained. This completes the proof. □

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

We presented this paper in the International Symposium on Biomathematics and Ecology Education Research in 2013. We would like to thank the organizers of this conference and the reviewers for their kind and helpful comments on this paper. Ali Akgül gratefully acknowledge that this paper was partially supported by the Dicle University and the Firat University. This paper is a part of PhD thesis of Ali Akgül.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Papanastasiou TC, Georgiou GC, Alexandrou AN:
*Viscous Fluid Flow*. CRC Press, Boca Raton; 1994.Google Scholar - Stefa Hughes WF, Elco RA: Magnetohydrodynamic lubrication flow between parallel rotating disks.
*J. Fluid Mech.*1962, 13: 21-32. 10.1017/S0022112062000464MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ghori QK, Ahmed M, Siddiqui AM: Application of homotopy perturbation method to squeezing flow of a Newtonian fluid.
*Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2007, 8: 179-184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ran XJ, Zhu QY, Li Y: An explicit series solution of the squeezing flow between two infinite plates by means of the homotopy analysis method.
*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2009, 14: 119-132. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.07.012MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Grimm RG: Squeezing flows of Newtonian liquid films an analysis include the fluid inertia.
*Appl. Sci. Res.*1976, 32: 149-166. 10.1007/BF00383711View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kamiyama S: Inertia effects in MHD hydrostatic thrust bearing.
*J. Lubr. Technol.*1969, 91: 589-596. 10.1115/1.3555005View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hamza EA: The magnetohydrodynamic squeeze film.
*J. Tribol.*1988, 110: 375-377. 10.1115/1.3261636View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bhattacharya S, Pal A: Unsteady MHD squeezing flow between two parallel rotating discs.
*Mech. Res. Commun.*1997, 24: 615-623. 10.1016/S0093-6413(97)00079-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Geng F, Cui M: Solving a nonlinear system of second order boundary value problems.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2007, 327: 1167-1181. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.05.011MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhou Y, Lin Y, Cui M: An efficient computational method for second order boundary value problems of nonlinear differential equations.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2007, 194: 357-365.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Yao H, Cui M: A new algorithm for a class of singular boundary value problems.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2007, 186: 1183-1191. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.157MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wang W, Cui M, Han B: A new method for solving a class of singular two-point boundary value problems.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2008, 206: 721-727. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.09.019MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wang YL, Chao L: Using reproducing kernel for solving a class of partial differential equation with variable-coefficients.
*Appl. Math. Mech.*2008, 29: 129-137. 10.1007/s10483-008-0115-yMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li F, Cui M: A best approximation for the solution of one-dimensional variable-coefficient Burgers’ equation.
*Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ.*2009, 25: 1353-1365. 10.1002/num.20428MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhou S, Cui M: Approximate solution for a variable-coefficient semilinear heat equation with nonlocal boundary conditions.
*Int. J. Comput. Math.*2009, 86: 2248-2258. 10.1080/00207160903229881MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Du J, Cui M: Solving the forced Duffing equations with integral boundary conditions in the reproducing kernel space.
*Int. J. Comput. Math.*2010, 87: 2088-2100. 10.1080/00207160802610843MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lv X, Cui M: An efficient computational method for linear fifth-order two-point boundary value problems.
*J. Comput. Appl. Math.*2010, 234: 1551-1558. 10.1016/j.cam.2010.02.036MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Du J, Cui M: Constructive proof of existence for a class of fourth-order nonlinear BVPs.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2010, 59: 903-911. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.10.003MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wu BY, Li XY: Iterative reproducing kernel method for nonlinear oscillator with discontinuity.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2010, 23: 1301-1304. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.06.018MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cui M, Lin Y:
*Nonlinear Numerical Analysis in the Reproducing Kernel Spaces*. Nova Science Publishers, New York; 2009.Google Scholar - Lü X, Cui M: Analytic solutions to a class of nonlinear infinite-delay-differential equations.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2008, 343: 724-732. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.101MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jiang W, Cui M: Constructive proof for existence of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2009, 215: 1937-1948. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.07.044MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cui M, Du H: Representation of exact solution for the nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integral equations.
*Appl. Math. Comput.*2006, 182: 1795-1802. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.016MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jiang W, Lin Y: Representation of exact solution for the time-fractional telegraph equation in the reproducing kernel space.
*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2011, 16: 3639-3645. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.12.019MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lin Y, Cui M: A numerical solution to nonlinear multi-point boundary-value problems in the reproducing kernel space.
*Math. Methods Appl. Sci.*2011, 34: 44-47. 10.1002/mma.1327MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mohammadi M, Mokhtari R: Solving the generalized regularized long wave equation on the basis of a reproducing kernel space.
*J. Comput. Appl. Math.*2011, 235: 4003-4014. 10.1016/j.cam.2011.02.012MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wu BY, Li XY: A new algorithm for a class of linear nonlocal boundary value problems based on the reproducing kernel method.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2011, 24: 156-159. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.036MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yao H, Lin Y: New algorithm for solving a nonlinear hyperbolic telegraph equation with an integral condition.
*Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.*2011, 27: 1558-1568. 10.1002/cnm.1376MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Inc M, Akgül A: The reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for solving Troesch’s problem.
*J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic. Appl. Sci.*2013, 14: 19-27.Google Scholar - Inc, M, Akgül, A, Geng, F: Reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for solving Bratu’s problem. Bul. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (in press)Google Scholar
- Inc M, Akgül A, Kilicman A: Explicit solution of telegraph equation based on reproducing kernel method.
*J. Funct. Spaces Appl.*2012., 2012: Article ID 984682Google Scholar - Inc M, Akgül A, Kilicman A: A new application of the reproducing kernel Hilbert space method to solve MHD Jeffery-Hamel flows problem in non-parallel walls.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2013., 2013: Article ID 239454Google Scholar - Inc M, Akgül A, Kilicman A: On solving KdV equation using reproducing kernel Hilbert space method.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2013., 2013: Article ID 578942Google Scholar - Inc M, Akgül A, Kilicman A: Numerical solutions of the second-order one-dimensional telegraph equation based on reproducing kernel Hilbert space method.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2013., 2013: Article ID 768963Google Scholar - Akram G, Rehman HU: Numerical solution of eighth order boundary value problems in reproducing Kernel space.
*Numer. Algorithms*2013, 62(3):527-540. 10.1007/s11075-012-9608-4MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wenyan W, Bo H, Masahiro Y: Inverse heat problem of determining time-dependent source parameter in reproducing kernel space.
*Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl.*2013, 14(1):875-887. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.08.009MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mokhtari R, İsfahani FT, Mohammadi M: Reproducing kernel method for solving nonlinear differential-difference equations.
*Abstr. Appl. Anal.*2012., 2012: Article ID 514103Google Scholar - Islam S, Ullah M, Zaman G, Idrees M: Approximate solutions to MHD squeezing fluid flow.
*J. Appl. Math. Inform.*2011, 29(5-6):1081-1096.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Idrees M, Islam S, Haq S, Islam S: Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to squeezing flow.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2010, 59: 3858-3866. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.04.023MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mohyuddin MR, Gotz T: Resonance behavior of viscoelastic fluid in Poiseuille flow in the presence of a transversal magnetic field.
*Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids*2005, 49: 837-847. 10.1002/fld.1026MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.