Large time behavior of solutions for the porous medium equation with a nonlinear gradient source
© Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 23 December 2013
Accepted: 3 April 2014
Published: 6 May 2014
This paper deals with the large time behavior of non-negative solutions for the porous medium equation with a nonlinear gradient source , , where and . When , we prove that the global solution converges to the separate variable solution . While , we note that the global solution converges to the separate variable solution . Moreover, when , we show that the global solution also converges to the separate variable solution for the small initial data , and we find that the solution blows up in finite time for the large initial data .
MSC:35K55, 35K65, 35B40.
Keywordslarge time behavior separate variable solution porous medium equation gradient source blow-up
Equation (1.1) arises in the study of the growth of surfaces and it has been considered as a mathematical model for a variety of physical problems (see [1, 2]). For instance, in ballistic deposition processes, the evolution of the profile of a growing interface is described by the diffusive Hamilton-Jacobi type equation (1.1) with (see ).
One of the particular feature of problem (1.1) is that the equation is a slow diffusion equation with nonlinear source term depending on the gradient of a power of the solution. In general, there is no classical solution. Therefore, it turns out that a suitable framework for the well-posedness of the initial-boundary value problem (1.1) is the theory of viscosity solutions (see [4–6]), so we first define the notion of solutions.
where , , , and .
and he gave the temporal decay estimates.
where , , and , and he proved that these solutions converge to the steady states by Lyapunov functional.
where , , and they showed that the non-negative radially symmetric solutions converge to the stationary solution.
Recently, in , Laurencot et al. extended the case of the problem (1.7) to the case , and derived that these solutions converge to two different separate variables solutions according to the cases and in the general bounded domain , respectively.
Motivated by the above work, by using the modified comparison argument, the self-similar transformation method, and the half-relaxed limits technique used in [6, 25, 26], we investigate the asymptotic behavior of non-negative solutions to (1.1). Our main results in this paper are stated as follows.
where is defined in (1.12).
Remark 1.2 In Theorem 1.4, we only give an upper estimate of the blow-up time. But the lower estimate of the blow-up time is an open problem.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we establish the comparison lemmas to prove the uniqueness of the positive solution to (1.9) and the identification of the half-relaxed limits. In Section 3, using the comparison principle, we construct the global solutions to obtain the upper bound and Hölder estimate of solutions to (1.1), and we prove Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 by the half-relaxed limits method. Moreover, we give the large time behavior of solutions to (1.1) with the small initial data for , and we prove Theorem 1.3 in Section 4. Finally, we obtain the blow-up case, and we prove Theorem 1.4 in Section 5.
2 Comparison lemmas
In this section, we establish the following comparison lemma between positive supersolutions and non-negative subsolutions to the elliptic equation in (1.9): which is an important tool for the uniqueness of the positive solution to (1.9) and the identification of the half-relaxed limits later.
For large enough, it is easy to see that is a non-empty open subset of .
It follows from and w vanishes on ∂ Ω by (2.2) that .
Letting , we conclude that zero is a cluster point of as . The claim (2.7) follows from the monotonicity of .
for and satisfying (2.8).
The proof of Lemma 2.1 is complete. □
A straightforward consequence of Lemma 2.1 is the uniqueness of the solution to (1.9).
Corollary 2.1 There is at most one positive viscosity solution to (1.9).
By the similar argument, we have the following result to (1.12).
Proof The proof is similar as in Lemma 2.1, so we omit it here. □
3 Proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2
In this section, we obtain the well-posedness and large time behavior of solutions to (1.1) for , and we prove Theorems 1.1-1.2. To do this, we first obtain the well-posedness to (1.1) by the following proposition.
Proposition 3.1 Assume that , , , and satisfies (1.2). Then there exists a unique solution to (1.1) in the sense of Definition 1.1.
Next, in order to prove the large time behavior of the solution to (1.1), we shall need several steps: Step 1, we will find that the temporal decay rate of is indeed . Step 2, we prove the boundary estimates for the large time which guarantee that no loss of boundary condition occurs throughout the time evolution. Step 3, the half-relaxed limits technique is applied to show the expected convergence after introducing self-similar variables. The approach is developed by Laurençot and Stinner in [25, 27]. To do this, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 3.1 (Upper bound)
The proof of Lemma 3.1 is complete. □
Lemma 3.2 (Upper bound)
The proof of Lemma 3.2 is complete. □
Lemma 3.3 (Hölder estimate)
for and .
where , , and are defined in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.
where , and and are defined in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.
The proof of Lemma 3.3 is complete. □
We next proceed as in  to deduce the Hölder continuity of from Lemma 3.3. Therefore, we obtain the following corollary.
Next, we shall give proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. To do this, we distinguish the two cases and .
Setting , we deduce from (3.18), (3.20), (3.21), and (3.22) that is a positive viscosity solution to (2.1) and solves (1.9). Therefore, the existence of a positive solution to (1.9) is proved. Moreover, by Corollary 2.1, we obtain the uniqueness of solution to (1.9).
Finally, Corollary 3.1 gives the last statement of Theorem 1.1. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.
The proof of Theorem 1.2 is complete. □
4 Proof of Theorem 1.3
In this section, we shall consider the well-posedness and the large time behavior of solutions to (1.1) with the small initial data for by the method used in . To do this, we need the following lemma.
where the parameter is defined in (1.10). Then is a solution to (1.1) with the initial data and such that for . Moreover, is a supersolution to (1.1) for .
Proof According to the definition of in (1.10), it is easy to see that for .
Therefore, is a supersolution to (1.1) with . In a similar way, it can be shown that is also a subsolution. Hence, is a solution to (1.1) with .
The proof of Lemma 4.1 is complete. □
where is defined in (4.1).
Proof On the one hand, the solution U to the porous medium equation (3.13) is clearly a subsolution to (1.1) in .
On the other hand, it follows from Lemma 4.1 that the function is a supersolution to (1.1) in . Therefore, is a supersolution to (3.13).
This property and the simultaneous vanishing of U and ℱ on allow us to use the classical Perron method to establish the existence of a solution to (1.1) in the sense of Definition 1.1 which satisfies (4.6). The uniqueness next follows from the comparison principle . The proof of Proposition 4.1 is complete. □
The convergence proof is similar to that performed in the proof of Theorem 1.2 for . The proof of Theorem 1.3 is complete. □
5 Proof of Theorem 1.4
In this section, when , we shall prove that the solution of (1.1) blows up in finite time for the large initial data in the sense of weak solution by the method used in .
Therefore, increases and remains above for all .
Hence, it follows from (5.10) and (5.11) that the solution of (1.1) blows up in finite time, .
The proof of Theorem 1.4 is complete. □
The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments on the original manuscript. The first author is supported by Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department (2014JY0098); the second author is supported in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Project No. CDJXS 12 10 00 14; the third author is supported in part by NSF of China (11371384).
- Andreucci D: Degenerate parabolic equations with initial data measures. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1997, 349: 3911-3923. 10.1090/S0002-9947-97-01530-4MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilding BH, Guedda M, Kersner R: The Cauchy problem for . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2003, 284: 733-755. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00395-0MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YX, Souplet P: Single-point gradient blow-up on the boundary for diffusive Hamilton-Jacobi equations in planar domains. Commun. Math. Phys. 2010, 293: 499-517. 10.1007/s00220-009-0936-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bardi M, Capuzzo-Dolcetta I: Optimal Control and Viscosity Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations. Birkhäuser, Boston; 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barles G Mathématiques et Applications 17. In Solutions de Viscosité des Equations d’Hamilton-Jacobi. Springer, Berlin; 1994.Google Scholar
- Crandall MG, Ishii H, Lions PL: User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 1992, 27: 1-67. 10.1090/S0273-0979-1992-00266-5MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arrieta JM, Bernal AR, Souplet P: Boundedness of global solutions for nonlinear parabolic equations involving gradient blow-up phenomena. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. 2004, 3: 1-15.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Benachour SD, Dăbuleanu-Hapca S, Laurençot P: Decay estimates for a viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Asymptot. Anal. 2007, 51: 209-229.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Ding JT, Guo BZ: Global existence and blow-up solutions for quasilinear reaction-diffusion equations with a gradient term. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 936-942. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.12.052MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Souplet P, Zhang QS: Global solutions of inhomogeneous Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. Anal. Math. 2006, 99: 355-396. 10.1007/BF02789452MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia L, Yao ZA: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of solutions for a singular parabolic equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 358: 182-188. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.04.039MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou WS, Lei PD: A one-dimensional nonlinear heat equation with a singular term. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 368: 711-726. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.03.066MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barles G, Souganidis PE: On the large time behaviour of solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2000, 31: 925-939. 10.1137/S0036141099350869MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benachour S, Dabuleanu S: Large time behavior for a viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation with Neumann boundary condition. J. Differ. Equ. 2005, 216: 223-258. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.02.017MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laurençot P: Convergence to steady states for a one-dimensional viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Pac. J. Math. 2007, 230: 347-364. 10.2140/pjm.2007.230.347View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Namah G, Roquejoffre JM: Remarks on the long time behaviour of the solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 1999, 24: 883-893. 10.1080/03605309908821451MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi YW, Wang MX: The self-similar profiles of generalized KPZ equation. Pac. J. Math. 2001, 201: 223-240. 10.2140/pjm.2001.201.223MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quittner P, Souplet P: Superlinear Parabolic Problems. Blow-up, Global Existence and Steady States. Birkhäuser, Basel; 2007.Google Scholar
- Roquejoffre JM: Convergence to steady states or periodic solutions in a class of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. 2001, 80: 85-104. 10.1016/S0021-7824(00)01183-1MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi PH, Wang MX: Global solution of the fast diffusion equation with gradient absorption terms. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 326: 602-621. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.02.094MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tchamba TT: Large time behavior of solutions of viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equations with superquadratic Hamiltonian. Asymptot. Anal. 2010, 66: 161-186.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Gilding BH: The Cauchy problem for : large-time behaviour. J. Math. Pures Appl. 2005, 84: 753-785. 10.1016/j.matpur.2004.11.003MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stinner C: Convergence to steady states in a viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation with degenerate diffusion. J. Differ. Equ. 2010, 248: 209-228. 10.1016/j.jde.2009.09.019MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barles G, Laurençot P, Stinner C: Convergence to steady states for radially symmetric solutions to a quasilinear degenerate diffusive Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Asymptot. Anal. 2010, 67: 229-250.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Laurençot P, Stinner C: Convergence to separate variable solutions for a degenerate parabolic equation with gradient source. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 2012, 24: 29-49. 10.1007/s10884-011-9238-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mu CL, Li YH, Wang Y: Life span and a new critical exponent for a quasilinear degenerate parabolic equation with slow decay initial values. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2010, 11: 198-206. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.10.048MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laurençot P, Stinner C: Refined asymptotics for the infinite heat equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 2011, 36: 532-546.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Da Lio F: Comparison results for quasilinear equations in annular domains and applications. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 2002, 27: 283-323. 10.1081/PDE-120002788MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawohl B, Kutev N: Comparison principle and Lipschitz regularity for viscosity solutions of some classes of nonlinear partial differential equations. Funkc. Ekvacioj 2000, 43: 241-253.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Manfredi JJ, Vespri V: Large time behavior of solutions to a class of doubly nonlinear parabolic equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 1994, 2: 1-17.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Guo JS, Guo YY: On a fast diffusion equation with source. Tohoku Math. J. 2001, 53: 571-579. 10.2748/tmj/1113247801MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YH, Mu CL: Life span and a new critical exponent for a degenerate parabolic equation. J. Differ. Equ. 2004, 207: 392-406. 10.1016/j.jde.2004.08.024MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mukai K, Mochizuki K, Huang Q: Large time behavior and life span for a quasilinear parabolic equation with slowly decaying initial values. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2000, 39: 33-45. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00161-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.