# On exact solution of unsteady MHD flow of a viscous fluid in an orthogonal rheometer

- Muhammad Afzal Rana
^{1}, - Sadia Siddiqa
^{2}Email author and - Saima Noor
^{3}

**2014**:146

**DOI: **10.1186/s13661-014-0146-y

© Rana et al.; licensee Springer 2014

**Received: **15 November 2013

**Accepted: **28 May 2014

**Published: **9 August 2014

## Abstract

This paper studies the unsteady MHD flow of a viscous fluid in which each point of the parallel planes are subject to the non-torsional oscillations in their own planes. The streamlines at any given time are concentric circles. Exact solutions are obtained and the loci Γ of the centres of these concentric circles are discussed. It is shown that the motion so obtained gives three infinite sets of exact solutions in the geometry of an orthogonal rheometer in which the above non-torsional oscillations are superposed on the disks. These solutions reduce to a single unique solution when symmetric solutions are looked for. Some interesting special cases are also obtained from these solutions.

### Keywords

viscous fluid MHD flow orthogonal rheometer eccentric rotation exact solutions## Introduction

Berker [1] has defined the ‘pseudo plane motions’ of the first kind that: if the streamlines in a plane flow are contained in parallel planes but the velocity components are dependent on the coordinate normal to the planes. Berker [2] has obtained a class of exact solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations belonging to the above type of flows. The ingenious analysis of Berker [3], [4] of the flow of an incompressible viscous fluid confined between two coaxially or non-coaxially rotating infinite parallel disks has shown the existence of an infinite number of exact solutions characterizing the asymmetric and symmetric motions. The symmetric solutions presented by Berker [3] belong to a new class and cannot be obtained as limiting cases of any of the known solutions. It was observed that these results are relevant in understanding the motions of the fluid in a device called an orthogonal rheometer.

Owing to the importance of exact solutions, many authors [5]–[9] have analyzed the flows in this geometry for different types of fluids. Rao and Kasiviswanathan [10] have investigated the unsteady viscous flow in the orthogonal rheometer and established the existence of three infinite sets of exact solutions. The flow of an elastico-viscous fluid in the above geometry has been investigated by Abbott and Walters [11]. They obtained the unique exact solution of the problem and it was considered as a particular case of the infinite set of solutions which satisfies the condition for symmetric solutions. Thornley [12] has considered an exact solution for the flow of an incompressible fluid confined between two infinite disks when both the fluid and the disk were in rigid-body rotation with constant angular velocity and one of the disks is used to perform non-torsional oscillations in its own plane in a rotating frame of reference.

The MHD flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids between two non-coaxial rotating disks has been one of the subjects which has attracted attention of many workers. Kasiviswanathan and Rao [13] investigated the unsteady MHD flow of a viscous, homogeneous, incompressible, electrically conducting fluid between two infinite, parallel, insulated disks rotating with the same angular velocity about two non-coincident axes in which the disks were subjected to non-torsional oscillations. Using the Laplace transform two sets of infinite solutions are presented and these solutions reduce to unique solution when symmetric solutions are looked for. Mohanty [14] obtained an exact solution for the viscous, homogeneous, incompressible, conducting fluid between eccentrically rotating disks having the same angular velocity in the presence of uniform transverse magnetic field. Further, Erkman [15] studied the same problem but for an induced magnetic field. Murthy and Ram [16] examined an exact solution for the case of flow due to non-coaxial rotations of a porous disk and a fluid at infinity under the application of a uniform transverse magnetic field. Rao and Rao [17] also considered the same physical situation as discussed by [14] but they considered the second grade fluid. Ersoy [18] obtained an exact solution of an Oldroyd-B fluid between two infinite, parallel, insulated disks rotating about non-coincident axes in the presence of a uniform transverse magnetic field. Moreover, Rajagopal [19] reviewed problems related to both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids between two parallel disks rotating about the same or distinct axes with the same and different angular velocities.

In this paper we have generalised the work of Rao and Kasiviswanathan [10] to the case of unsteady MHD flow of a conducting, incompressible viscous fluid between two infinite, parallel, insulated disks rotating with the same angular velocity about non-coincident axes normal to the disks. Each point of the parallel planes is subjected to non-torsional oscillations in their own planes. The streamlines at a given instant are concentric circles in each plane parallel to a fixed plane ${\pi}_{0}$ and each point of the plane is performing non-torsional oscillations. Exact solutions are obtained and the loci of the centres of concentric circles are discussed. In the geometry of an orthogonal rheometer where non-torsional oscillations are imposed on the disks relative to the basic rotations, the existence of three infinite sets of exact solutions is established. Three cases arise *i.e.* when: (i) $\omega >\delta $, (ii) $\omega <\delta $ and (iii) $\omega =\delta $. These solutions reduce to a single unique solution when symmetric solutions are looked for.

## Governing equations

*z*-axis. The unsteady flow of an incompressible fluid in the presence of a magnetic field is governed by the following equations:

**V**is the velocity field,

**T**the Cauchy stress tensor,

**J**the electric current density,

*ρ*the density and $D/Dt$ the material time derivative. In addition,

**B**($={\mathbf{B}}_{0}+\mathbf{b}$) is the total magnetic field in which

**b**and ${\mathbf{B}}_{0}$ denote the induced magnetic field and imposed magnetic field, respectively. In the absence of displacement currents, the Maxwell equations [20], [21] and the modified Ohm law [22] can be written as

**E**is the electric field, ${\mu}_{m}$ the magnetic permeability and

*σ*the electric field conductivity. It is assumed that all the thermo-physical fluid properties are constant throughout the flow field region. Also, the induced magnetic field

**b**is negligible compared with the applied magnetic field ${\mathbf{B}}_{0}$. It is further supposed that no energy is added or extracted from the fluid by the electric field which implies that there is no electric field present in the fluid flow region. Under these assumptions the electromagnetic force $\mathbf{J}\times \mathbf{B}$ takes the form

*u*,

*v*,

*w*are the components of velocity in the Cartesian coordinate system $(x,y,z)$. For this motion, the streamlines for all time

*t*are contained in planes parallel to the fixed plane ${\pi}_{0}$ and the plane $Oxy$ is parallel to this fixed plane. The constitutive equation of the viscous fluid is

*p*being the pressure,

**I**the unit tensor, ${\mathbf{A}}_{1}$ the Rivilin-Ericksen tensor,

*μ*the dynamic viscosity and

**f**the body force. The Rivilin-Ericksen tensor ${\mathbf{A}}_{1}$ is defined by

*T*denotes the transpose. The Navier-Stokes equations governing the flow in view of Eqs. (1) and (4)-(7) are given by

*v*the kinematic coefficient of viscosity. The subscript denotes the partial derivatives with respect to corresponding variables throughout the paper. From the equation of motion in the

*z*-direction one finds

*ϕ*to be independent of

*z*. In the present analysis the authors are interested in getting solutions of an unsteady MHD fluid motion in which the streamlines at any instant are concentric circles in each plane with normal line parallel to the

*Oz*-axis. Therefore, consider

*t*and belong to the instantaneous axis of the vortex. The condition that Γ must not be a straight line perpendicular to the $Oxy$ plane gives the inequality:

*ψ*has to satisfy Eqs. (8) and (9). According to Eq. (10), the velocity components are given by the equations:

*c*be any constant and let

*π*be the plane $z=c$. Equation (15) shows that at a given time ${t}_{0}$, the fluid particles belonging to the plane

*π*move like the points of a solid plate which rotates around a fixed point with coordinates $(f(c,{t}_{0}),g(c,{t}_{0}),c)$ and with constant angular velocity

*ω*, given by

*π*which are parallel to the plane $Oxy$. Thus (15) should be interpreted as a motion due to rigid rotation superposed by some unsteady motion.

## Exact solutions

*ϕ*from (8) and (9) by differentiating with respect to

*z*and making use of (14) and (16) we obtain

*δ*is the frequency of oscillation. Letting

*A*,

*B*and

*C*are assumed to be

*δ*by −

*δ*at appropriate places in the above equations. The general solutions of the differential equation (17) in view of Eqs. (18), (19), (22) and (24) are given by

- (i)A translation parallel to the plane $Oxy$ and defined by the equations:This transformation gets rid of the constants ${A}_{1}$ and ${A}_{2}$ contained in Eqs. (25) and (26).${x}_{1}=x-({A}_{1}cos\delta t+{A}_{2}sin\delta t),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{y}_{1}=y-({A}_{2}cos\delta t-{A}_{1}sin\delta t).$(28)
- (ii)If ${B}_{1}^{2}+{B}_{2}^{2}>0$ and ${C}_{1}^{2}+{C}_{2}^{2}>0$, a translation parallel to the axis
*Oz*and a rotation about this axis. This translation and rotation is so chosen that the equation of the curve Γ in the new axes reduces to the following form:where${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{1}:\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\begin{array}{l}x=a{x}_{0}+a({x}_{B}cos\delta t+{y}_{B}sin\delta t),\\ y=a{y}_{0}+a({y}_{B}cos\delta t-{x}_{B}sin\delta t),\end{array}\}$(29)with ${\beta}_{1}$, $a>0$, ${\beta}_{0}=\sqrt{\omega /2\upsilon}>0$. Equation (29) contains only two arbitrary real constants$\begin{array}{r}{x}_{0}=cosh({\beta}_{0}z)cos({\beta}_{0}z+n),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{y}_{0}=sinh({\beta}_{0}z)sin({\beta}_{0}z+n),\\ {x}_{B}=cosh({\beta}_{i1}z)cos({\beta}_{i1}z+n),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{y}_{B}=sinh({\beta}_{i1}z)sin({\beta}_{i1}z+n)\end{array}$(30)*a*and*n*. - (iii)If ${B}_{1}^{2}+{B}_{2}^{2}>0$ and ${C}_{1}={C}_{2}=0$, a translation parallel to the axis
*Oz*. This translation is so chosen that the equations of the curve Γ with respect to the new axes reduce to the following form:where${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{2}:\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\begin{array}{l}x=a{x}_{0}+aexp({\beta}_{r1}z)cos({\beta}_{i1}z-\delta t),\\ y=a{y}_{0}+aexp({\beta}_{r1}z)sin({\beta}_{i1}z+\delta t),\end{array}\}$(31)with $a>0$, ${\beta}_{0}\ne 0$, ${\beta}_{1}\ne 0$. Equation (31) involves only one arbitrary real constant${x}_{0}=exp({\beta}_{0}z)cos({\beta}_{0}z),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{y}_{0}=exp({\beta}_{0}z)sin({\beta}_{0}z),$(32)*a*. - (iv)If ${C}_{1}^{2}+{C}_{2}^{2}>0$ and ${B}_{1}=0={B}_{2}$, again a translation parallel to the axis
*Oz*. This translation is so chosen that the equations of the curve Γ in the new axes reduce to the following form:where${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{3}:\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\begin{array}{l}x=a{x}_{0}-aexp(-{\beta}_{r1}z)cos({\beta}_{i1}z+\delta t),\\ y=a{y}_{0}-aexp(-{\beta}_{r1}z)sin({\beta}_{i1}z-\delta t),\end{array}\}$(33)with $a>0$, ${\beta}_{0}\ne 0$, ${\beta}_{1}\ne 0$. Equation (33) again contains only one constant${x}_{0}=exp(-{\beta}_{0}z)cos({\beta}_{0}z),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{y}_{0}=-exp(-{\beta}_{0}z)sin({\beta}_{0}z),$(34)*a*. It is worth mentioning that the curves ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{1}$-${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{3}$ reduce to the curves given by Rao and Kasiviswanathan [10] when ${B}_{0}=0$. - (v)Lastly, when $\omega =\delta $ the curve Γ by a proper choice of axes can be written aswith $a,b>0$;${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{4}:\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\begin{array}{l}x=(az+b{z}^{2})cos(\omega t+n),\\ y=-(az+b{z}^{2})sin(\omega t+n),\end{array}\}$(35)
*n*is any arbitrary constant. This transformation has no counterpart in the corresponding steady problem. Likewise, curves ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{5}$ and ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{6}$, similar to the curves ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{2}$, can be obtained for $\omega <\delta $.

*z*or for very small

*δ*. So for large

*z*(36) reduces to

*z*, having the properties given by Berker [4]. A similar discussion holds for the curves ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{2}$-${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{6}$. It can be further noted that ${e}^{{\beta}_{0}z}$ dominates over the other terms, the curve ${\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{1}$ is wrapped around the surface of revolution ${S}_{1}$ the axis of which is

*Oz*and the meridian (in cylindrical coordinates) of which is given in Eq. (36).

## Unsteady MHD flow in an orthogonal rheometer

Consider the unsteady MHD flow of a conducting, incompressible viscous fluid between two infinite, parallel, insulated disks ${D}_{1}$ and ${D}_{2}$ rotating with the same angular velocity *ω* about non-coincident axes ${z}^{\prime}$ and ${z}^{\u2033}$ normal to the planes of the disks and performing non-torsional oscillations in their own planes. This model represents the motion of the fluid in the instrument called an orthogonal rheometer.

*z*-axis perpendicular to the disks and the lower and the upper disks are located at $z=-h$ and $z=h$, respectively. Let the lower disk rotate about the point ${P}_{1}(-{x}_{1},-{y}_{1},-h)$ and the upper disk about ${P}_{2}({x}_{1},{y}_{1},h)$. Taking the middle point

*O*of ${P}_{1}{P}_{2}$ as the origin and perpendicular axes

*Ox*and

*Oy*lying in the plane $z=0$ so that the

*z*-axis is perpendicular to these axes. The superposed unsteady motion is created by subjecting each point of the lower and upper disk to non-torsional oscillations of the type $\overline{a}{e}^{i\delta t}+\overline{b}{e}^{-i\delta t}$ and $\overline{c}{e}^{i\delta t}+\overline{d}{e}^{-i\delta t}$, respectively, where $\overline{a}$, $\overline{b}$, $\overline{c}$ and $\overline{d}$, are given complex constants. The governing equation for this motion is given by Eq. (17) whereas the boundary conditions are

*ω*,

*i.e.*, (i) $\omega >\delta $, (ii) $\omega <\delta $, (iii) $\omega =\delta $. The solutions for

*f*and

*g*contain six arbitrary constants, namely ${a}_{1}$, ${a}_{2}$, ${b}_{1}$, ${b}_{2}$, ${x}_{p}$ and ${y}_{p}$, giving three sets of infinite solutions. Hence the existence of three sets of infinite solutions for the unsteady MHD motion of the fluid in an orthogonal rheometer in which the non-torsional oscillations are superposed on the disks are established. These solutions for

*f*and

*g*reduce to the solutions of Rao and Kasiviswanathan [10] for ${B}_{0}\to 0$.

## Results and discussion

*f*and

*g*are given by Eqs. (25) and (26). Substituting Eqs. (14) and (16) in Eqs. (8) and (9), we get

*p*is the pressure and

*μ*the coefficient of viscosity. Using the values of $(u,v,w)$ given in Eq. (54), we obtain from Eq. (60)

*f*and

*g*are defined in Eqs. (48) and (49). Similarly, the stress applied on the lower plate at any point $(x,y,-h)$ can be calculated.

*O*, if the velocity field is a symmetric vector field with respect to the point

*O*. Therefore, the symmetric solution has to satisfy the following condition:

*O*, (ii) the mid point of the line segment ${P}_{1}{P}_{2}$. The velocity field given by Eq. (54) satisfies the condition (62), provided

*f*and

*g*are odd functions of

*z*and

*O*of the axes. Therefore, for a symmetric solution the constants in Eq. (45) should satisfy

*C*denotes an arbitrary constant.

## Conclusion

In this study we have considered the unsteady MHD flow of a viscous fluid in which each point of the parallel planes is subjected to the non-torsional oscillations in their own planes. Exact solutions for the described model are presented. The major findings of the present work are summarised as follows:

The existence of three sets of infinite numbers of solutions for the unsteady MHD motion of a viscous fluid in an orthogonal rheometer in which the non-torsional oscillations are superposed on the disks is established. These solutions reduce to a single unique solution when symmetric solutions are looked for.

The results of Rao and Kasiviswanathan [10] are recovered for ${B}_{0}=0$ and Berker [4] in the absence of MHD and oscillations.

The present work also includes the solutions of Kasiviswanathan and Rao [13] as a special case.

## Declarations

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Berker, RA: Sur Quelques cas d’ intéegration des équations du mouvement d’un fluide visqueux incompressible. Théses françaises de l’entre-deux-guerres (1936)Google Scholar
- Berker R: Intégration des équations du mouvement d’un fluide visqueux incompressible. In
*Handbuch der Physik*. Springer, Berlin; 1963:1-384.Google Scholar - Berker R: A new solution of the Navier-Stokes equation for the motion of a fluid contained between two parallel plates rotating about the same axis.
*Arch. Mech. Stosow.*1979, 31: 265-280.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Berker R: An exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equation. The vortex curvilinear axis.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1982, 20: 217-230. 10.1016/0020-7225(82)90017-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rajagopal KR, Gupta AS: Flow and stability of second grade fluid between rotating planes.
*Arch. Mech.*1981, 33: 663-674.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Rajagopal KR, Gupta AS: Flow and stability of a second grade fluid between two parallel plates rotating about noncoincident axes.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1981, 19: 1401-1409. 10.1016/0020-7225(81)90037-9MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rajagopal KR: On the flow of a simple fluid in an orthogonal rheometer.
*Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.*1982, 79: 39-47. 10.1007/BF02416565View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Siddiqui AM, Rana MA, Ahmed N: Effects of Hall current and heat transfer on MHD flow of a Burgers’ fluid due to a pull of eccentric rotating disks.
*Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2008, 13: 1554-1570. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2006.10.005MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Siddiqui AM, Rana MA, Ahmed N: Magnetohydrodynamics flow of a Burgers’ fluid in an orthogonal rheometer.
*Appl. Math. Model.*2010, 34: 2881-2892. 10.1016/j.apm.2009.12.022MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rao AR, Kasiviswanathan SR: On exact solutions of the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations-the vortex with instantaneous curvilinear axis.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1987, 25: 337-349. 10.1016/0020-7225(87)90040-1MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Abbott TNG, Walters K: Rheometrical flow systems, part 2. Theory for the orthogonal rheometer, including an exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equations.
*J. Fluid Mech.*1970, 40: 205-213. 10.1017/S0022112070000125View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Thornley C: On Stokes and Rayleigh layers in a rotating system.
*Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math.*1968, 21: 451-461. 10.1093/qjmam/21.4.451View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kasiviswanathan SR, Rao AR: On exact solutions of unsteady MHD flow between eccentrically rotating disks.
*Arch. Mech.*1987, 39: 411-418.Google Scholar - Mohanty HK: Hydromagnetic flow between two rotating disks with noncoincident parallel axes of rotation.
*Phys. Fluids*1972, 15: 1456-1458. 10.1063/1.1694107View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Erkman CS: Magnetohydrodynamic flow of a viscous, incompressible fluid between rotating parallel plates.
*Lett. Appl. Eng. Sci.*1975, 3: 51-59.Google Scholar - Murthy SN, Ram RKP: MHD flow and heat transfer due to eccentric rotations of a porous disk and a fluid at infinity.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1978, 16: 943-949. 10.1016/0020-7225(78)90053-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rao AR, Rao PR: On the magnetohydrodynamic flow between eccentrically rotating disks.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1983, 21: 359-372. 10.1016/0020-7225(83)90120-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ersoy HV: MHD flow of an Oldroyd-B fluid between eccentric rotating disks.
*Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1999, 37: 1973-1984. 10.1016/S0020-7225(99)00010-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rajagopal KR: Flow of viscoelastic fluids between rotating plates.
*Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.*1992, 3: 185-206. 10.1007/BF00417912View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sherchiff J:
*A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics*. Pergamon, Oxford; 1965.Google Scholar - Davidson PA:
*An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sutton GW, Sherman A:
*Engineering Magnetohydrodynamics*. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1965.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.**Open Access** This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.