- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Existence of periodic solutions of Boussinesq system
Boundary Value Problems volume 2016, Article number: 39 (2016)
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of the dynamical behavior of a Boussinesq system, which is a basic model in describing the flame propagation in a gravitationally stratified medium. This system consists of an incompressible Navier-Stokes equation coupled with a reaction-advection-diffusion equation under the Boussinesq approximation. We prove that this system possesses time dependent periodic solutions, bifurcating from a steady solution.
1 Introduction and main results
The Boussinesq-type equation of reactive flows is a basic model in describing the flame propagation in a gravitationally stratified medium, and its non-dimensional form is given by
where \((t,x)\in\mathbf{R}^{+}\times\mathbf{R}^{3}\), \(U\in\mathbf{R}^{3}\) is the velocity field, T is the temperature function, \(\nu>0\) denotes the Prandtl number, which is the ratio of the kinematic and thermal diffusivities (inverse proportional to the Reynolds number); \(P(x,t)\in\mathbf{R}\) denotes the pressure; the vector \(\overset {\rightarrow }{\rho}=\rho \overset {\rightarrow }{g}\) corresponds to the non-dimensional gravity \(\overset {\rightarrow }{g}\) scaled by the Rayleigh number \(\rho>0\). The reaction term of Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov (KPP) type is of the form
Here, α is the reaction rate. See [1] for the derivation of this model and the related parameters.
When the initial temperature \(T_{0}\) is identically zero (or constant), the above system reduces to the classical incompressible Navier-Stokes equation:
Since the work of Sattinger [2], Iudovich [3], and Iooss [4] in 1971, the bifurcation of stationary solutions into time-periodic solutions (i.e. Hopf bifurcation) of incompressible Navier-Stokes equation has attracted much attention, see [5–10], etc. When the linearized operator possesses a continuous spectrum up to the imaginary axis and that a pair of imaginary eigenvalues crosses the imaginary axis, Melcher, et al. [11] proved Hopf bifurcation for the vorticity formulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\). Their work is mainly motivated by the work of Brand et al. [12] who studied the Hopf-bifurcation problem and its exchange of stability for a coupled reaction diffusion model in \(\mathbf{R}^{a}\). Inspired by the work of [11, 12], this paper is to establish the corresponding Hopf-bifurcation result for the three-dimensional Boussinesq system.
The Boussinesq system is a very important model in fluid mechanics, which exhibits extremely rich phenomena, for example, Rayleigh-Bénard convection [13–15], geophysical fluid dynamics [16, 17] etc. A key problem in the study of the dynamic behavior of Boussinesq system is how to understand the time-periodic solutions, quasi-periodic solutions and traveling waves, etc. There were several papers on the existence of time-periodic solutions [18] and traveling waves [19–24] for the Boussinesq system (1.1). To our knowledge, there is no theoretical result on bifurcation analysis for the Boussinesq system on \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\).
In the present paper, we consider the reactive Boussinesq system with external time-independent force in \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\)
with initial conditions
where \(f(x,\epsilon)\) and \(h(x,\epsilon)\in\mathbf{R}^{3}\times\mathbf{R}\) are external time independent forces, which depend smoothly on some parameter ϵ, \(g(T)=T(1-T)\). Meanwhile, external forces \(f(x,\epsilon)\) and \(h(x,\epsilon)\) can be chosen suitably so that \((U_{\epsilon}(x),T_{\epsilon}(x),P_{\epsilon}(x))\) is the solution of the steady Boussinesq system
with the condition
Furthermore, assume that the steady solution \((U_{\epsilon}(x),T_{\epsilon}(x),P_{\epsilon}(x))\) satisfies the following certain decay properties:
(A0) For \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s>2\),
where C and \(\mathbf{L}^{p}_{s}\) denote a positive constant and the weighted Lebesgue space to be specified blow.
We also assume that the solution of system (1.2)-(1.4) has the form
where
and \((u_{\epsilon}(x),\tilde{T}_{\epsilon}(x),P_{\epsilon}(x))\) is the solution of the following steady problem:
with the condition
Then the deviation \((u(x,t),v(x,t),p(x,t))\) from the stationary \((U_{\epsilon}(x),T_{\epsilon}(x),P_{\epsilon}(x))\) satisfies
Here, for general matrices \(u=(u_{ij})_{i,j=1,2,3}\),
In fact, by the incompressible condition (1.7), it follows that
So, system (1.6)-(1.8) can be rewritten as
with the incompressible condition
It is convenient to rewrite system (1.9)-(1.10) in the stream function and vorticity formulation in dimensionless form. The vorticity associated with the velocity field u of the fluid is defined by \(\omega=\nabla\times u\). Then, using
we can rewrite system (1.9)-(1.10) in the stream function and the vorticity formulation in dimensionless form
where
Note that we can assume that \(\nabla\cdot\omega=0\). This is because the space of divergence free vector fields is invariant under the evolution of (1.11).
Denote \(\varphi=(\omega,v)^{T}\). Then we can write system (1.11)-(1.12) as the evolution equation of the form
where
and
For \(y\in\mathbf{R}^{3}\), the Fourier transform \(\mathcal{F}\) and the inverse Fourier transform \(\mathcal{F}^{-1}\) are given by
For \(s\geq0\), \(1\leq p\leq2\), and \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\), the Fourier transform is a continuous mapping from \(\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\) into \(\mathbf{W}_{\kappa}^{q}\). Especially, when \(p=2\), the Fourier transform is an isomorphism between \(\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\) and \(\mathbf{W}_{\kappa}^{q}\).
Since we deal with the problem in the whole space \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\), it is advantageous to apply the Fourier transform to the evolution equation (1.13). Denote \(\hat{\varphi}=(\hat{\omega},\hat{v})^{T}\). Then
where
and
Here, ∗ denotes the convolution. That is,
and for general matrices \(u=(u_{kj})_{k,j=1,2,3}\),
To overcome the essential spectrum of operator Ä´ (defined in (2.3)) up to the imaginary axis, for \(3< p<4\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\), we need the following assumption:
-
(A1)
For any \(\epsilon\in[\epsilon_{c}-\epsilon_{0},\epsilon_{c}+\epsilon_{0}]\), 0 is not an eigenvalue of Ä´.
-
(A2)
For \(\epsilon=\epsilon_{c}\), the operator Ä´ has two pair eigenvalues \((\lambda_{0}^{+},\mu_{0}^{+})\) and \((\lambda_{0}^{-},\mu_{0}^{-})\) satisfying
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda_{0}^{\pm}(\epsilon_{c})= \mu_{0}^{\pm}(\epsilon_{c})=\pm i \varpi_{c}\neq0,\quad \mbox{for } \varpi_{c}>0, \end{aligned}$$(1.15)$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{d}{d\epsilon}\mathbf{Re}\bigl(\lambda_{0}^{\pm}( \epsilon)\bigr)\bigg| _{\epsilon=\epsilon_{c}}>0,\qquad \frac{d}{d\epsilon}\mathbf{Re}\bigl( \mu_{0}^{\pm}(\epsilon)\bigr)\bigg|_{\epsilon =\epsilon_{c}}>0. \end{aligned}$$(1.16) -
(A3)
The remaining eigenvalue of Ä´ is strictly bounded away from the imaginary axis in the left half plane for all \(\epsilon\in[\epsilon_{c}-\epsilon_{0},\epsilon_{c}+\epsilon_{0}]\).
Here is our main result in this paper.
Theorem 1.1
Assume that (A0)-(A3) hold. Then for \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\), system (1.14) has a time-periodic solution
with \(\epsilon=\epsilon_{c}+\epsilon_{0}\), \(\epsilon_{0}\in(0,\beta)\), \(\Vert (\hat{u},\hat{v})\Vert _{\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}}=O(\epsilon_{0})\), \(\varpi-\varpi_{c}=O(\epsilon_{0}^{2})\).
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give the basic setting of the problem and derive some priori estimates needed in the proof in next section. The proof of the main result occupies the Section 3.
2 Preliminary and some estimates
We start this section by introducing some notations. Consider the following standard Sobolev space, a spatially weighted Lebesgue space:
where the weighted function \(\rho(x)=\sqrt{1+\vert x\vert ^{2}}\).
To investigate periodic solutions of system (1.2)-(1.4), we also introduce the space
and the weighted space
with norms
for \(\varphi=(u,v)^{T}\in\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\) or \(\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\), respectively.
As we known, the vorticity \(\omega=\nabla\times u\), where u is the velocity field. By the Biot-Savart law, u is recovered from ω as
The following estimates are taken from [11], which show the norm relationship û with ω̂.
Lemma 2.1
Let \(p\in[1,+\infty]\). For \(k=1,2,3\) and \(\hat{\omega}\in(\mathbf{L}^{p}(\mathbf{R}^{3}))^{3}\), there exists a constant C such that
Furthermore, for every \(p\in[1,3)\), \(p_{1},p_{2}\in[1,\infty]\) with \(\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}=\frac{1}{p}\),
Meanwhile, if \(\hat{\omega}\in\mathbf{L}^{p}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\cap\mathbf {L}^{p_{1}}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\), then \(\hat{u}\in\mathbf{L}^{p}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\) and the above estimate also holds.
Then, for the weighted space \(\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\), the following Sobolev embedding holds.
Lemma 2.2
For \(p_{1}\geq p_{2}\) and \(s>\frac{a}{p_{2}}-\frac{a}{p_{1}}\), the continuous embedding \(\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p_{1}}(\mathbf{R}^{a})\subset\mathcal{L}^{p_{2}}(\mathbf{R}^{a})\) holds.
Proof
Note that \(\rho(y)=(1+\vert y\vert ^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}\), \(y\in\mathbf{R}^{a}\). By direct computation, we have
Hence, for \(sp_{3}>a\), the above inequality implies that \(\Vert \rho^{-s}(y)\Vert _{\mathbf{L}^{p_{3}}}^{p_{3}}\) is bounded.
Let \(\frac{1}{p_{2}}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{3}}\). By Hölder’s inequality and the above inequality, it follows that for \(\forall\varphi\in\mathcal{L}^{p_{2}}(\mathbf{R}^{a})\),
This completes the proof. □
From Corollary 2.6 in [11], the following result holds.
Lemma 2.3
Let \(p\in(\frac{3}{2},+\infty]\). For any \(\hat{\omega}_{1},\hat{\omega}_{2}\in\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\), there exists a positive constant C such that
Furthermore, let \(p\in(3,4)\). Then, for \(s>0\),
Lemma 2.4
Let \(p\in(\frac{3}{2},+\infty]\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\). Then there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
By Young’s inequality and Lemma 2.1, it follows that
where \(\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}=1\) and \(p_{2}\in[1,3)\).
For \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\) and \(p>p_{1}\), applying the Sobolev embedding \(\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\subset\mathbf{L}^{1}\cap\mathbf{L}^{p_{1}}\) to (2.1) yields
This completes the proof. □
Lemma 2.5
Let \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s>1\). Then there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
By Young’s inequality and Lemma 2.1, we have
where \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p_{1}}=1\), \(\frac{1}{p'_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}\), and \(p_{2}\in[1,3)\).
For \(p\geq p_{1}\) and \(s>3(\frac{1}{p_{1}}-\frac{1}{p})\), \(p\geq p'_{1}\) and \(s>3(\frac{1}{p'_{1}}-\frac{1}{p})\), applying the Sobolev embedding \(\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\subset\mathbf{L}^{p_{1}}\) and \(\mathbf{L}_{s}^{p}\subset\mathbf{L}^{p'_{1}}\) to (2.2), we derive
This completes the proof. □
Consider the linearized operator of (1.14)
where
and
Then we can rewrite system (1.14) as
where
and
Remark 2.1
By applying the theorem of Riesz, it is easy to see that the operators \(\mathcal{J}_{\epsilon}\) and NÌ‚ differ by a relatively compact perturbation in \(\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}\), for \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\). Hence, the essential spectrum of the operator \(\mathcal{J}\) equals the essential spectrum of the operator NÌ‚ (see [25], p. 136).
Lemma 2.6
Let \(p\in(\frac{3}{2},+\infty]\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\). Then, for \((\hat{\omega},\hat{v})\in\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\), there exists a positive constant C such that
Moreover, for \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s>0\), there exists a positive constant C such that
Proof
Applying Lemma 2.4 and Young’s inequality for convolution, it is easy to derive this result. □
Lemma 2.7
Let \(p, p_{1}\geq1\). Then, for \(s>1\), \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}\), and \(\hat{f}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\), the equation
has a unique solution \(\varphi=\hat{N}^{-1}\hat{f}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\).
Proof
Let \(\eta(y)\in\mathbf{C}^{\infty}(\mathbf{R},[0,1])\) be a cut-off function satisfying
Consider
where
Denote
By Minkowski’s inequality, Hölder’s inequality, and Lemma 2.2, for \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}\), \(p'>p_{1}\), and \(s>3(\frac{1}{p_{1}}-\frac{1}{p'})\), we have
It is easy to check that \(\Vert \tilde{\Upsilon}_{\vert y\vert >1}^{j}\Vert _{\mathbf{L}^{\infty}}<+\infty\) for \(j=1,2,3\). For \(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{s}{2}< p'<\frac{3}{2}+\frac{s}{2}\), we have
In the same way, we get
Therefore, by (2.4) and the above estimates, for \(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{s}{2}< p'<1+\frac{s}{3}\) and \(\frac{1}{p_{1}}-\frac{1}{p'}\geq\frac{1}{3}\), we obtain
This completes the proof. □
Lemma 2.8
Let \(p,p_{2}\in(\frac{2}{3},+\infty]\). For \(s\geq2\) and \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}\). Then the operator \(\hat{N}^{-1}\cdot {DF}(\hat{\varphi})\) is a compact operator on \(\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}\). Furthermore, the operator
is a Fredholm operator with index 0.
Proof
Denote the set
and \(\chi_{n}=(\hat{N}^{-1}\cdot {DF}(\hat{\varphi}))\hat{\varphi}_{n}\) for any sequence \(\hat{\varphi}_{n}=(\hat{\omega}_{n},\hat{v}_{n})\in\mathcal{S}\).
By Minkowski’s inequality, Hölder’s inequality, and Lemma 2.2, for \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}\), \(p'>p_{1}\), and \(s>3(\frac{1}{p_{1}}-\frac{1}{p'})\), we have
As proved in Lemma 2.4, by Young’s inequality for convolutions, for \(p,p_{2}\in(\frac{3}{2},+\infty]\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p_{2}})\), we can get
From (2.5), for \(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{s}{2}< p'<1+\frac{s}{3}\) and \(\frac{1}{p_{1}}-\frac{1}{p'}\geq\frac{2}{3}\), we derive
By (2.7)-(2.9), it follows that
Therefore, \(\hat{N}^{-1}\cdot {DF}(\hat{\varphi})\mathcal{S}\) is a precompact set in \(\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\). This completes the proof. □
Lemma 2.9
Let \(p,p_{2}\in(\frac{2}{3},+\infty]\). For \(s\geq2\), \(\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{p_{2}}\) and \(\hat{f}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\), the equation
has a unique solution \(\hat{\varphi}=\mathcal{J}_{\epsilon}^{-1}\hat{f}=\Gamma^{-1}\hat {N}^{-1}\hat{f}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}_{s}(\mathbf{R}^{3})\), where the operator
Proof
This is a direct result from Lemma 2.8. □
3 Proof of the main result
This section is devoted to proving the main result. Since the linear operator which we get in solving equation (1.13) is not invertible for \(\epsilon=\epsilon_{0}\), the implicit function theorem cannot be applied directly. The Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction is a powerful method to deal with this case. Assume that \(\vert \epsilon-\epsilon_{0}\vert \) and \(\vert \varpi-\varpi_{0}\vert \) are suitable small. We find the \(2\pi/\varpi\)-time-periodic solution \(\hat{\varphi}=(\hat{\omega},\hat{v})\in\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\), which can be made the ansatz as
and satisfying
Introduce the projection \(S_{n}\) onto the nth Fourier mode, i.e.,
and the \(\mathcal{J}\)-invariant orthogonal projection \(\mathcal{P}_{n,c}\) onto the subspace spanned by the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue \((in\varpi,in\varpi)\). We denote \(\mathcal{P}_{n,s}=1-\mathcal{P}_{n,c}\).
Applying the projection \(S_{n}\) to equation (3.1) we get lattice systems for the Fourier modes \(S_{n}\hat{\varphi}\)
where
Denote
Then we rewrite lattice system (3.2) as
In the following, we want to prove that if
is given, then the above lattice systems are solvable.
By assumptions (A1)-(A3), (3.3)-(3.5), and Lemma 2.9, we obtain
where
Lemma 3.1
Define \(\Xi=(\Xi_{1n},\Xi_{2n})_{n\in\mathbf{Z}}:\mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\rightarrow \mathcal{L}_{s}^{p}\) and \((\Xi\hat{\varphi})_{n\in\mathbf{Z}}=(\Xi_{1n}\hat{\omega}_{n},\Xi _{2n}\hat{v}_{n})\). Then
Proof
 □
Lemma 3.2
Let \(p>\frac{3}{2}\) and \(s>3(1-\frac{1}{p})\). Then, for any \(\hat{\varphi}\in\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\),
Proof
By Lemma 2.6, we obtain
 □
Lemma 3.3
There exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
Proof
This result is directly derived from assumption (A3), the property of the sectorial operators \(\mathcal{J}_{\epsilon}\) and N̂, Lemma 2.3, and Lemma 2.8. □
Now, we return to equation (3.10). From Lemmas 3.1-3.3, \(\mathcal{F}:\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\rightarrow\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\) is well defined and smooth for \(p\in(3,4)\) and \(s\geq2\). It is obvious that \(\mathcal{F}(0,0)=0\), \(D_{\hat{\varphi}}\mathcal{F}:\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\rightarrow\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}\) is invertible and \(D_{\hat{\varphi}}\mathcal{F}(0,0)=I\). Therefore, by the implicit function theorem, there exists a unique smooth solution \(\hat{\varphi}_{s}=\hat{\varphi}_{s}(\hat{\varphi}_{c})\) satisfying \(\Vert \hat{\varphi}_{s}(\hat{\varphi}_{c})\Vert _{\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}}\leq C\Vert \hat{\varphi}_{c}\Vert _{\mathcal{X}_{s}^{p}}\).
Finally, we give the proof of our main result. This proof is based on the classical Hopf bifurcation (see [26]) applied to solve the equation (3.6) by the implicit function theorem. Let \(\psi_{n}^{+}\in\mathcal{X}^{p}_{s}\) denote the eigenfunctions associated with the eigenvalues \((\pm i\varpi_{0},\pm i\varpi_{0})\). \(\chi_{0}^{+}(\epsilon)\) is the eigenvalues of operator \(\mathcal{J}_{\epsilon}\) under the basis \((\psi_{n}^{+},\psi_{n}^{+})\). Introduce \(p_{n,c}\) by \(\mathcal{P}_{n,c}\varphi=p_{n,c}(\varphi)\psi_{n}^{+}\). Then, for \(\xi\in\mathbf{C}\setminus {0}\), it follows (3.6) that
which implies that
Define the complex-valued smooth function
where \(\Lambda(\epsilon_{c}+\beta,\alpha):=p_{n,c}(G_{+1}(\hat{\varphi}_{s}(\xi \psi_{n}^{+})))\).
Denote
and
By (1.15)-(1.16) and Lemma 3.2, we know that \(\Upsilon(0;0,0)=0\) and the determinant of the Jacobi matrix
Therefore, there exists a function \(\alpha\mapsto(\varrho(\alpha),\beta(\alpha))\) with \(\varrho(0)=\beta(0)=0\) satisfying
for \(\vert \alpha \vert \) sufficient small.
Due to the degree of nonlinearity term in (3.11), it is easy to see that there exists a function \(\alpha(\beta)\) such that \(\hat{\varphi}_{n,c}=\alpha(\beta)\psi_{n}^{+}\) is the solution of (3.6) for \(\varpi=\varpi_{0}+\varrho(\alpha(\beta))\) and \(\epsilon=\epsilon_{0}+\beta\). This completes the proof.
References
Zeldovich, YB, Barenblatt, GI, Librovich, VB, Makhviladze, GM: The Mathematical Theory of Combustion and Explosions. Consultants Bureau, New York (1985)
Sattinger, DH: Bifurcation of periodic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 41, 66-80 (1971)
Iudovich, VI: Appearance of auto-oscillations in a fluid. Prikl. Mat. Meh. 35, 638-655 (1971)
Iooss, G: Bifurcation des solutions périodiques de certains problèmes d’évolution. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. A 273 624-627 (1971)
Chen, ZM, Price, WG: Time dependent periodic Navier-Stokes flows on a two-dimensional torus. Commun. Math. Phys. 179, 577-597 (1996)
Chen, ZM: Bifurcations of a steady-state solution to the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 201, 117-138 (1999)
Chen, ZM, Price, WG: Remarks on the time dependent periodic Navier-Stokes flows on a two-dimensional torus. Commun. Math. Phys. 207, 81-106 (1999)
Glowinski, R, Guidoboni, G: Hopf bifurcation in viscous incompressible flow down an inclined plane: a numerical approach. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 10, 434-454 (2008)
Iooss, G: Bifurcation of a periodic solution of the Navier-Stokes equations into an invariant torus. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 58, 35-56 (1975)
Iooss, G, Mielke, A: Bifurcating time-periodic solutions of Navier-Stokes equations in infinite cylinders. J. Nonlinear Sci. 1, 107-146 (1991)
Melcher, A, Schneider, G, Uecker, H: A Hopf-bifurcation theorem for the vorticity formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations in \(\mathbf{R}^{3}\). Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 33, 772-783 (2008)
Brand, T, Kunze, M, Schneider, G, Seelbach, T: Hopf bifurcation and exchange of stability in diffusive media. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 171, 263-296 (2004)
Bodenschatz, E, Pesch, W, Ahlers, G: Recent developments in Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 709-778 (2000)
Getling, AV: Rayleigh-Bénard Convection. Structures and Dynamics. Advanced Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 11. World Scientific, River Edge (1998)
Tritton, D: Physical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)
Lions, JL, Temam, R, Wang, S: On the equations of large-scale ocean. Nonlinearity 5, 1007-1053 (1992)
Pedlosky, J: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1987)
Climent-Ezquerra, B, Guillén-González, F, Rojas-Medar, MA: Time-periodic solutions for a generalized Boussinesq model with Neumann boundary conditions for temperature. Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 2153-2164 (2007)
Constantin, P, Kiselev, A, Ryzhik, L: Fronts in reactive convection: bounds, stability and instability. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 56, 1781-1803 (2003)
Constantin, P, Kiselev, A, Ryzhik, L: Traveling waves in 2D reactive Boussinesq systems with no-slip boundary conditions. Nonlinearity 19(11), 2605-2615 (2006)
Malham, S, Xin, J: Global solutions to a reactive Boussinesq system with front data on an infinite domain. Commun. Math. Phys. 193, 287-316 (1998)
Lewicka, M: Existence of traveling waves in the Stokes-Boussinesq system for reactive flows. J. Differ. Equ. 237, 343-371 (2007)
Lewicka, M, Mucha, PB: On the existence of traveling waves in the 3D Boussinesq system. Commun. Math. Phys. 292, 417-429 (2009)
Winn, B: Traveling fronts in a reactive Boussinesq system: bounds and stability. Commun. Math. Phys. 259, 451-474 (2005)
Henry, D: Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Springer, New York (1981)
Marsden, JE, Mccracken, M: The Hopf Bifurcation and Its Applications. Springer, Berlin (1976)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the project of Education department of Henan Province 14A110013, and the project of Tianyuan 11426106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Gu, L. Existence of periodic solutions of Boussinesq system. Bound Value Probl 2016, 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0552-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0552-4