Table 2 Comparison of the computational time for FMGA and OMGM for Example 1
| n | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| C.R. | 62.2% | 44.3% | 29.3% | 18.5% | 11.2% | 6.69% | 3.89% |
| T̃(s) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.68 | 1.95 | 4.88 |
| T(s) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 2.82 | 11.5 | 47.4 |
| n | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| C.R. | 62.2% | 44.3% | 29.3% | 18.5% | 11.2% | 6.69% | 3.89% |
| T̃(s) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.68 | 1.95 | 4.88 |
| T(s) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 2.82 | 11.5 | 47.4 |