Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing the errors with different types of norms and quasi-norms for Example 2 with \(p = 1.5\) and \(s = 0.6\) for SMRPI and EFG methods

From: An efficient meshless radial point collocation method for nonlinear p-Laplacian equation

h

 

\(\frac{1}{4}\)

\(\frac{1}{8}\)

\(\frac{1}{16}\)

\(\frac{1}{32}\)

\(\frac{1}{64}\)

\(|u-u_{h}|_{1,p}\)

EFG

7.135 × 10−3

3.352 × 10−3

1.612 × 10−3

7.856 × 10−4

3.908 × 10−4

SMRPI

3.321 × 10−1

6.632 × 10−4

8.286 × 10−6

4.151 × 10−6

7.194 × 10−7

\(|u-u_{h}|_{u,p}\)

EFG

9.129 × 10−3

4.456 × 10−3

2.125 × 10−3

1.010 × 10−4

4.915 × 10−4

SMRPI

4.225 × 10−1

2.025 × 10−4

7.887 × 10−6

9.301 × 10−7

1.811 × 10−7

\(|\sigma -\sigma _{h}|_{0,q}\)

EFG

1.094 × 10−2

6.371 × 10−3

3.518 × 10−3

1.825 × 10−4

9.108 × 10−4

SMRPI

4.521 × 10−1

2.012 × 10−3

8.986 × 10−5

9.103 × 10−6

1.129 × 10−6

\(|\sigma -\sigma _{h}|_{\sigma ,q}\)

EFG

7.023 × 10−3

3.527 × 10−3

1.704 × 10−3

8.150 × 10−4

3.971 × 10−4

SMRPI

3.884 × 10−1

1.938 × 10−3

6.416 × 10−5

5.553 × 10−6

1.112 × 10−6