# On radiation effects on hydromagnetic Newtonian liquid flow due to an exponential stretching sheet

- PK Kameswaran
^{1}, - M Narayana
^{1}, - P Sibanda
^{1}Email author and - G Makanda
^{1}

**2012**:105

**DOI: **10.1186/1687-2770-2012-105

© Kameswaran et al.; licensee Springer 2012

**Received: **25 May 2012

**Accepted: **23 August 2012

**Published: **2 October 2012

## Abstract

The paper investigates the radiation effect on the magnetohydrodynamic Newtonian fluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet. The effects of frictional heating and viscous dissipation on the heat transport are taken into account. The governing partial differential equations are transformed into ordinary differential equations using a suitable similarity transformation. Zero-order analytical solutions of the momentum equation and confluent hypergeometric solutions of heat and mass transport equations are obtained. The accuracy of analytical solutions is verified by numerical solutions obtained using a shooting technique that uses a Runge-Kutta-Felhberg integration scheme and a Newton-Raphson correction scheme. The effects of the radiation parameter, the magnetic parameter, Gebhart and Schmidt numbers on the momentum, heat and mass transports are discussed. The skin friction and heat and mass transfer coefficients for various physical parameters are discussed.

## 1 Introduction

The study of laminar boundary layer flow over a stretching sheet has received considerable attention in the recent past due to its immense application in industry, for example, in extrusion processes such as the polymer extrusion from a dye and wire drawing. Other engineering applications of the stretching sheet problem include polymer sheet extrusion from a dye, drawing, tinning and annealing of copper wires, glass fiber and paper production, the cooling of a metallic plate in a cooling bath and so on. There has been tremendous amount of work on the stretching sheet problem in the past several decades (see Crane [1], Gupta and Gupta [2], Grubka and Bobba [3], Dutta and Gupta [4], Siddappa and Abel [5], Chen and Char [6], Laha *et al.* [7], Chakrabarti and Gupta [8], Anderson *et al.* [9], Siddheshwar and Mahabaleswar [10], Abel and Mahesha [11], Abel *et al.* [12] and the references therein).

The above studies concern the linear stretching sheet problem but most of the practical situations involve a non-linear stretching sheet such as an exponential one. With this in mind, several authors have considered the velocity of the sheet to vary exponentially with the distance from the slit. Elbashbeshy [13] was among the first to study the exponentially stretching sheet problem. He considered a perforated sheet and examined the effect of wall mass suction on the flow and heat transfer over an exponentially stretching surface. Using a suitable similarity transformation, he transformed the momentum equation into a non-linear Riccati type equation and solved it iteratively. Ishak [14] studied the MHD boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet with radiation effect. He found that the local heat transfer rate at the surface decreased with increasing values of the magnetic and radiation parameters. The flow and heat transfer from an exponentially stretching surface was considered by Magyari and Keller [15]. They examined the heat and mass transfer characteristics and compared with the well-known results of the power-law models. Sanjayanand and Khan [16] studied the heat and mass transfer in a viscoelastic boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet. They found that the viscoelastic parameter enhances the thermal boundary layer thickness. The effect of viscous dissipation on the mixed convection heat transfer from an exponentially stretching surface was studied by Partha *et al.* [17]. They observed a rapid growth in the non-dimensional skin friction coefficient with the mixed convection parameter. The influence of thermal radiation on the boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet is studied by Sajid and Hayat [18]. Khan [19] presented an elegant solution of the viscoelastic boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet in terms of Whittaker’s function.

The characteristics desired of the final product in an extrusion process depend on the rate of stretching and cooling. Hence, it is very important to have a controlled cooling environment where the flow over the stretching sheet can be regulated by external agencies like a magnetic field. An exponential variation of a magnetic field is used, among other applications, to determine the diamagnetic susceptibility of plasma. Steenbeck [20] determined the diamagnetic susceptibility of a cylindrical plasma for axial magnetic fields with various gas pressure and magnetic field strengths. Tonks [21] studied the effects of a magnetic field in the plasma of an arc. Pavlov [22] considered the magnetohydrodynamic flow of an incompressible viscous fluid over a linearly stretching surface. Sarpakaya [23] extended Pavlov’s work to non-Newtonian fluids. Subsequent studies by Andersson [24], Lawrence and Rao [25], Abel *et al.* [26], Cortell [27] concerned the magnetohydrodynamic flow of viscoelastic liquids over a stretching sheet. Radiation effects on MHD flow past an exponentially accelerated isothermal vertical plate with uniform mass diffusion in the presence of a heat source was studied by Reddy *et al.* [28]. They observed that the velocity decreases with an increase in the magnetic parameter due to a resistive drag force which tends to resist the fluid flow and thus reduces the velocity. The boundary layer thickness was also found to decrease with an increase in the magnetic parameter.

Most of the earlier work neglected radiation effects. If the polymer extrusion process is placed in a thermally controlled environment, radiation could become important. As with magnetohydrodynamics, careful control of thermal radiative heat transfer has an effect on the characteristics of the final product. Many researchers have considered the effect of thermal radiation on flows over stretching sheets. Studies by Raptis [29], Raptis and Perdikis [30] address the effect of radiation in various situations. Siddheshwar and Mahabaleswar [10] studied the effects of radiation and heat source on MHD flow of a viscoelastic liquid and heat transfer over a stretching sheet. Bidin and Nazar [31] studied the effects of numerical solution of the boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet with thermal radiation. They observed that the temperature profiles and the thermal boundary layer thickness increase slightly with an increase in the Eckert number. They also showed that an increase in *Pr* causes a decrease in temperature profiles and the thermal boundary layer thickness. Physically, if *Pr* increases, the thermal diffusivity decreases, and these phenomena lead to the decreasing of energy ability that reduces the thermal boundary layer. Elbashbeshy and Dimian [32] analyzed boundary layer flow in the presence of radiation effect and heat transfer over the wedge with a viscous coefficient. Thermal radiation effects on hydro-magnetic flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet were studied by Reddy and Reddy [33]. They found that as radiation increases, the temperature profiles and thermal boundary layer thickness also increase. They also observed that the temperature profiles and thermal boundary layer thickness increase slightly with an increase in the Eckert number. Raptis *et al.* [34] studied the effect of thermal radiation on the magnetohydrodynamic flow of a viscous fluid past semi-infinite stationary plate and Hayat *et al.* [35] extended the analysis for the second grade fluid.

In addition to a magnetic field and thermal radiation, one has to consider the viscous dissipation effects due to frictional heating between fluid layers. The effect of viscous dissipation in natural convection processes has been studied by Gebhart [36] and Gebhart and Mollendorf [37]. They observed that the effect of viscous dissipation is predominant in vigorous natural convection and mixed convection processes. They also showed the existence of a similarity solution for the external flow over an infinite vertical surface with an exponential variation of surface temperature. Vajravelu and Hadjinicalaou [38] studied the heat transfer characteristics over a stretching surface with viscous dissipation in the presence of internal heat generation or absorption.

In this paper, we investigate the effects of various physical and fluid parameters such as the magnetic parameter, radiation parameter and viscous dissipation parameter on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of an exponentially stretching sheet. The momentum, energy and concentration equations are coupled and nonlinear. By using suitable similarity variables, these equations are converted into coupled ordinary differential equations and are solved analytically and numerically by using the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg and Newton-Raphson schemes.

## 2 Mathematical formulation

*x*-axis is taken along the continuous stretching surface and points in the direction of motion. The

*y*-axis is perpendicular to the plate. The sheet velocity is assumed to vary as an exponential function of the distance

*x*from the slit. The temperature and concentration far away from the fluid are assumed to be ${T}_{\mathrm{\infty}}$ and ${C}_{\mathrm{\infty}}$ respectively as shown in Figure 1. The sheet-ambient temperature and concentration differences are also assumed to be exponential functions of the distance

*x*from the slit. A variable magnetic field of strength $B(x)$ is applied normally to the sheet. Under the usual boundary layer approximation, subject to radiation and viscous dissipation effects, the equations governing the momentum, heat and mass transports can be written as

*u*,

*v*are the velocity components in the

*x*,

*y*directions respectively,

*ν*is the kinematic viscosity,

*ρ*is the density,

*σ*is the electrical conductivity of the fluid,

*T*is the temperature,

*C*is the concentration, $\alpha =k/\rho {C}_{p}$ is the thermal diffusivity,

*k*is the thermal conductivity, ${C}_{p}$ is the specific heat at constant pressure, ${q}_{r}$ is the radiative heat flux, and

*D*is the species diffusivity.

Here the subscripts *w*, ∞ refer to the surface and ambient conditions respectively, ${T}_{0}$, ${C}_{0}$ are positive constants, ${U}_{0}$ is the characteristic velocity, and *L* is the characteristic length.

*ψ*such that

where *η* is the similarity variable, $f(\eta )$ is the dimensionless stream function, $\theta (\eta )$ is the dimensionless temperature, and $\varphi (\eta )$ is the dimensionless concentration.

## 3 Skin friction, heat and mass transfer coefficients

The parameters of engineering interest in heat and mass transport problems are the skin friction coefficient ${C}_{f}$, the local Nusselt number ${\mathit{Nu}}_{x}$, and the local Sherwood number ${\mathit{Sh}}_{x}$. These parameters respectively characterize the surface drag, wall heat and mass transfer rates.

*μ*is the coefficient of viscosity and $\mathit{Re}=\frac{L{U}_{0}}{\nu}$ is the Reynolds number. The skin friction coefficient is defined as

*k*is thermal conductivity of the fluid. The Nusselt number is defined as

In Equations (19), (22) and (25), ${\mathit{Re}}_{x}$ represents the local Reynolds number and it is defined as ${\mathit{Re}}_{x}=\frac{x{U}_{w}}{\nu}$.

## 4 Analytical solution

### 4.1 Solution of momentum equation

*η*once over to the interval $[0,\eta ]$, we obtain

*η*and using the condition ${f}_{\eta}^{(0)}(0)=0$, we get

*s*can be obtained as

Further, we assume that the first-order iterate of *f* satisfies the boundary conditions on *f* as given in (14). The above non-linear Riccati type equation can be solved in terms of a confluent hypergeometric Whittaker function as discussed by Khan [19]. However, we restrict ourselves to the zero-order solution, and similarly, to heat and mass transport equations.

### 4.2 Solution of heat transfer equation

*f*and ${f}_{\eta}$ and further introducing a new variable

*η*, we get

### 4.3 Solution of mass transfer equation

*f*and ${f}_{\eta}$ and further introducing a new variable

## 5 Solution procedure

*η*may change for a different set of physical parameters. Once the appropriate value of

*η*is determined, the coupled boundary value problem given by Equations (11)-(13) is solved numerically using the method of superposition. In this method, third-order non-linear Equation (11), second-order Equations (12) and (13) have been reduced to five ordinary differential equations as follows:

*η*. The boundary conditions now become

where ${s}_{1}$, ${s}_{2}$ and ${s}_{3}$ are determined such that ${f}_{2}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$, ${f}_{4}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$ and ${f}_{6}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$. Thus, to solve this system, we require six initial conditions. However, since we have only three initial conditions for *f* and two initial conditions for *θ* and *ϕ*, the conditions ${f}^{\u2033}(0)$, ${\theta}^{\prime}(0)$, ${\varphi}^{\prime}(0)$ are to be determined by the shooting method using the initial guess values ${s}_{1}$, ${s}_{2}$ and ${s}_{3}$ until the conditions ${f}_{2}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$, ${f}_{3}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$ and ${f}_{5}(\mathrm{\infty})=0$ are satisfied. In this paper, we employed the shooting technique with the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg scheme to determine two more unknowns in order to convert the boundary value problem to an initial value problem. Once all the six initial conditions were determined, the resulting differential equations were integrated using an initial value solver. For this purpose, the fifth-order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg integration scheme was used.

## 6 Results and discussion

*f*has been obtained analytically. Solutions of the energy and species equations were obtained in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions. The accuracy of the method was established by comparing the analytical solution with the numerical solution obtained by a shooting method together with Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg and Newton-Raphson schemes. The skin friction, heat and mass transfer coefficients are tabulated in Tables 1-3. The effects of magnetic, radiation and viscous dissipation parameters on the velocity ${f}^{\prime}(\eta )$, temperature $\theta (\eta )$ and concentration $\varphi (\eta )$ profiles are shown in Figures 2-6.

**A comparison of**
$\mathbf{-}{\mathit{f}}^{\mathbf{\u2033}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**obtained by the analytical method with the shooting technique for different values of**
M

M | $\mathbf{-}{\mathit{f}}^{\u2033}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | |
---|---|---|

Analytical | Numerical | |

0 | 1.22474 | 1.281809 |

1 | 1.58114 | 1.629178 |

2 | 1.87083 | 1.912620 |

3 | 2.12132 | 2.158736 |

5 | 2.54951 | 2.581130 |

10 | 3.39116 | 3.41529 |

*M*. Increasing values of

*M*result in considerable opposition to the flow in the form of a Lorenz drag which enhances the values of the skin friction coefficient. Table 2 highlights the effect of the magnetic field, radiation and dissipation on the dimensionless wall temperature gradient. It is evident that all the three parameters reduce the values of the wall temperature gradient. Table 3 shows that the increase in Schmidt numbers leads to the increase in the dimensionless wall concentration gradient, while the opposite trend is observed in the case of the magnetic parameter. The results confirm a good agreement between analytical and numerical results.

**A comparison of**
$\mathbf{-}{\mathit{\theta}}^{\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**obtained by the analytical method with the shooting technique for different values of**
M
**,**
Gb
**and**
K
**for fixed values of**
$\mathit{Pr}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{7}$

M | K | Gb | $\mathbf{-}{\mathit{\theta}}^{\prime}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Analytical | Numerical | |||

0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 3.82684 | 3.822508 |

1 | 3.48576 | 3.483155 | ||

2 | 3.19181 | 3.191131 | ||

3 | 2.92781 | 2.928577 | ||

1 | 0 | 0.2 | 4.56379 | 4.556219 |

0.5 | 3.48576 | 3.483155 | ||

1 | 2.90556 | 2.905805 | ||

2 | 2.25649 | 2.260503 | ||

3 | 1.88314 | 1.889815 | ||

1 | 0.5 | 0 | 3.94905 | 3.946604 |

0.1 | 3.71740 | 3.714879 | ||

0.2 | 3.48576 | 3.483155 | ||

0.5 | 2.79082 | 2.787982 | ||

1 | 1.63260 | 1.629360 |

**A comparison of**
$\mathbf{-}{\mathit{\varphi}}^{\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**obtained by the analytical method with the shooting technique for different values of**
M
**,**
Sc

M | Sc | $\mathbf{-}{\mathit{\varphi}}^{\prime}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | |
---|---|---|---|

Analytical | Numerical | ||

0 | 1 | 1.79791 | 1.805684 |

1 | 1.69115 | 1.699309 | |

2 | 1.60312 | 1.611410 | |

3 | 1.52781 | 1.535984 | |

1 | 1 | 1.69115 | 1.699309 |

2 | 2.58672 | 2.589044 | |

5 | 4.34813 | 4.344825 | |

10 | 6.32456 | 6.318568 |

*i.e.*, $\mathit{Pr}=\mathit{Sc}=K=\mathit{Gb}=0$). We observe that skin friction coefficient increases with an increase in the magnetic parameter. It is interesting to note that the value of the wall skin-friction coefficient in the non-magnetic ($M=0$) and magnetic ($M=1$) cases are in good agreement with the results presented by Reddy and Reddy [33].

**A comparison of**
$\mathbf{-}{\mathit{f}}^{\mathbf{\u2033}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**for different values of**
M
**for fixed values of**
$\mathit{Pr}\mathbf{=}\mathit{Sc}\mathbf{=}\mathit{K}\mathbf{=}\mathit{Gb}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$

M | $\mathbf{-}{\mathit{f}}^{\u2033}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | |
---|---|---|

Reddy and Reddy [33] | Present | |

0 | 1.28213 | 1.28181 |

1 | 1.62918 | 1.62918 |

2 | - | 1.91262 |

3 | - | 2.15874 |

4 | - | 2.37937 |

Figure 2 shows the variation of the velocity profile against the magnetic parameter. We notice that the effect of the magnetic parameter is to reduce the velocity of the fluid in the boundary layer region. This is due to an increase in the Lorentz force, similar to Darcy’s drag observed in the case of flow through a porous medium. This adverse force is responsible for slowing down the motion of the fluid in the boundary layer region. These results are similar to the results obtained by Reddy and Reddy [33].

*M*result in thickening of the species boundary layer.

*K*on temperature is shown in Figure 5. It is clear that thermal radiation enhances the temperature in the boundary layer region. Thus radiation should be kept at its minimum in order to facilitate better cooling environment. The radiation parameter

*K*defines the relative contribution of conduction heat transfer to thermal radiation transfer.

*Gb*on the heat transfer is shown in Figure 6. It is clear that the temperature in the boundary layer region increases with an increase in the viscous dissipation parameter. We also note that since the energy equation is partially decoupled from the momentum and species conservation equations, the parameters affecting the energy equation, namely, the Prandtl number, the radiation parameter and the Gebhart number, do not alter velocity and concentration profiles. We also observe a good agreement between the analytical and numerical solutions through Figures 2-6.

## 7 Conclusions

The problem of hydromagnetic Newtonian liquid flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet in the presence of radiation and viscous dissipation effects has been analyzed. Exact solutions were found in terms of hypergeometric functions, and a comparison of analytical and numerical results was shown. We found that the effect of the magnetic parameter is to reduce the velocity of the fluid in the boundary layer region. It was also observed that the increase in values of *M* results in thickening of the species boundary layer. The combined and individual effects of the magnetic parameter *M*, the radiation parameter *K*, and the viscous dissipation parameter *Gb* are to increase the heat transfer rates. Under some limiting conditions when the parameters *Pr*, *Sc*, *K*, *Gb* are zero, the current results agree well with available results in the literature.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Research Foundation (NRF) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal for financial support.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Crane LJ:
**Flow past a stretching plate.***Z. Angew. Math. Phys.*1970, 21: 645-647. 10.1007/BF01587695View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gupta PS, Gupta AS:
**Heat and mass transfer on a stretching sheet with suction or blowing.***Can. J. Chem. Eng.*1977, 55: 744-746. 10.1002/cjce.5450550619View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Grubka LG, Bobba KM:
**Heat transfer characteristics of a continuous stretching surface with variable temperature.***J. Heat Transf.*1985, 107: 248-250. 10.1115/1.3247387View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dutta BK, Gupta AS:
**Cooling of a stretching sheet in a various flow.***Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.*1987, 26: 333-336. 10.1021/ie00062a025View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Siddappa B, Abel MS:
**Non-Newtonian flow past a stretching plate.***Z. Angew. Math. Phys.*1985, 36: 47-54. 10.1007/BF00949032MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chen CK, Char MI:
**Heat transfer of a continuous stretching surface with suction or blowing.***J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1988, 135: 568-580. 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90172-2MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Laha MK, Gupta PS, Gupta AS:
**Heat transfer characteristics of the flow of an incompressible viscous fluid over a stretching sheet.***Wärme-Stoffübertrag.*1989, 24: 151-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chakarabarti A, Gupta AS:
**Hydromagentic flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet.***Q. Appl. Math.*1979, 37: 73-78.Google Scholar - Andersson HI, Bech KH, Dandapat BS:
**Magnetohydrodynamic flow of a power-law fluid over a stretching sheet.***Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.*1992, 27: 929-936. 10.1016/0020-7462(92)90045-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Siddheshwar PG, Mahabaleswar US:
**Effects of radiation and heat source on MHD flow of a viscoelastic liquid and heat transfer over a stretching sheet.***Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.*2005, 40: 807-820. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.04.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Abel MS, Mahesha N:
**Heat transfer in MHD viscoelastic fluid flow over a stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity, non-uniform heat source and radiation.***Appl. Math. Model.*2008, 32: 1965-1983. 10.1016/j.apm.2007.06.038MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Abel MS, Siddheshwar PG, Mahesha N:
**Effects of thermal buoyancy and variable thermal conductivity on the MHD flow and heat transfer in a power-law fluid past a vertical stretching sheet in the presence of a non-uniform heat source.***Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.*2009, 44: 1-12. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.08.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Elbashbeshy EMA:
**Heat transfer over an exponentially stretching continuous surface with suction.***Arch. Mech.*2001, 53(6):643-651.Google Scholar - Ishak A:
**MHD boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet with radiation effect.***Sains Malays.*2011, 40(4):391-395.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Magyari E, Keller B:
**Heat and mass transfer in the boundary layers on an exponentially stretching continuous surface.***J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys.*1999, 32: 577-585. 10.1088/0022-3727/32/5/012View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sanjayanand E, Khan SK:
**On heat and mass transfer in a viscoelastic boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet.***Int. J. Therm. Sci.*2006, 45: 819-828. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.11.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Partha MK, Murthy PVSN, Rajasekhar GP:
**Effect of viscous dissipation on the mixed convection heat transfer from an exponentially stretching surface.***Heat Mass Transf.*2005, 41: 360-366. 10.1007/s00231-004-0552-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sajid M, Hayat T:
**Influence of thermal radiation on the boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*2008, 35: 347-356. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.08.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Khan SK:
**Boundary layer viscoelastic fluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet.***Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng.*2006, 11(2):321-335.Google Scholar - Steenbeck M:
**Wissen. Veroff.***Siemens*1936., 15(2): Article ID 1Google Scholar - Tonks L:
**Theory of magnetic effects in the plasma of an arc.***Phys. Rev.*1939, 56: 360-373. 10.1103/PhysRev.56.360View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pavlov KB:
**Magnetohydromagnetic flow of an incompressible viscous fluid caused by deformation of a surface.***Magn. Gidrodin.*1974, 4: 146-147.Google Scholar - Sarpakaya T:
**Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in a magnetic field.***AIChE J.*1961, 7: 324-328. 10.1002/aic.690070231View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Andersson HI:
**MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid past a stretching surface.***Acta Mech.*1992, 95: 227-230. 10.1007/BF01170814MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lawrence PS, Rao BN:
**The non-uniqueness of the MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid past a stretching sheet.***Acta Mech.*1995, 112: 223-228. 10.1007/BF01177490MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Abel MS, Joshi A, Sonth RM:
**Heat transfer in MHD viscoelastic fluid flow over a stretching surface.***Z. Angew. Math. Mech.*2001, 81: 691-698.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cortell R:
**Flow and heat transfer of an electrically conducing fluid of second grade over a stretching sheet subject to suction and to a transverse magnetic field.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2006, 49: 1851-1856. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.11.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Reddy PBA, Reddy NB, Suneetha S:
**Radiation effects on MHD flow past an exponentially accelerated isothermal vertical plate with uniform mass diffusion in the presence of heat source.***J. Appl. Fluid Mech.*2012, 5(3):119-126.Google Scholar - Raptis A:
**Radiation and viscoelastic flow.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*1999, 26(6):889-895. 10.1016/S0735-1933(99)00077-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Raptis A, Perdikis C:
**Viscoelastic flow by the presence of radiation.***Z. Angew. Math. Mech.*1998, 78: 277-279. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4001(199804)78:4<277::AID-ZAMM277>3.0.CO;2-FMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bidin B, Nazar R:
**Numerical solution of the boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet with thermal radiation.***Eur. J. Sci. Res.*2009, 33(4):710-717.Google Scholar - Elbashbeshy EMA, Dimian MF:
**Effect of radiation on the flow and heat transfer over a wedge with variable viscosity.***Appl. Math. Comput.*2002, 132: 445-454. 10.1016/S0096-3003(01)00205-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Reddy PBA, Reddy NB:
**Thermal radiation effects on hydromagnetic flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet.***Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput.*2011, 3(4):300-306.Google Scholar - Raptis A, Perdikis C, Takhar HS:
**Effect of thermal radiation on MHD flow.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2004, 153: 645-649.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Hayat T, Abbas Z, Sajid M, Asghar S:
**The influence of thermal radiation on MHD flow of a second grade fluid.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2007, 50: 931-941. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gebhart B:
**Effect of viscous dissipation in natural convection.***J. Fluid Mech.*1962, 14: 225-232. 10.1017/S0022112062001196MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gebhart B, Mollendorf J:
**Viscous dissipation in external natural convection flows.***J. Fluid Mech.*1969, 38: 97-107. 10.1017/S0022112069000061View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vajravelu K, Hadjinicolaou A:
**Heat transfer in a viscous fluid over a stretching sheet with viscous dissipation and internal heat generation.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*1993, 20: 417-430. 10.1016/0735-1933(93)90026-RView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Abramowitz M, Stegun LA
**National Bureau of Standards, AMS 55.***Handbook of Mathematical Functions*1972.Google Scholar - Pal D, Shivakumara IS:
**Mixed convection heat transfer from a vertical plate embedded in a sparsely packed porous medium.***Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng.*2006, 11(4):929-939.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.