Open Access

Positive solutions of a fractional thermostat model

Boundary Value Problems20132013:5

DOI: 10.1186/1687-2770-2013-5

Received: 17 October 2012

Accepted: 29 December 2012

Published: 16 January 2013

Abstract

We study the existence of positive solutions of a nonlinear fractional heat equation with nonlocal boundary conditions depending on a positive parameter. Our results extend the second-order thermostat model to the non-integer case. We base our analysis on the known Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem on cones.

1 Introduction

Fractional calculus has been studied for centuries mainly as a pure theoretical mathematical discipline, but recently, there has been a lot of interest in its practical applications. In current research, fractional differential equations have arisen in mathematical models of systems and processes in various fields such as aerodynamics, acoustics, mechanics, electromagnetism, signal processing, control theory, robotics, population dynamics, finance, etc. [13]. For some recent results in fractional differential equations, see [412] and the references therein.

Infante and Webb [13] studied the nonlocal boundary value problem
u = f ( t , u ) , t ( 0 , 1 ) , u ( 0 ) = 0 , β u ( 1 ) + u ( η ) = 0 ,
which models a thermostat insulated at t = 0 with the controller at t = 1 adding or discharging heat depending on the temperature detected by the sensor at t = η . Using fixed point index theory and some results on their work on Hammerstein integral equations [14, 15], they obtained results on the existence of positive solutions of the boundary value problem. In particular, they have shown that if β 1 η , then positive solutions exist under suitable conditions on f. This type of boundary value problem was earlier investigated by Guidotti and Merino [16] for the linear case with η = 0 where they have shown a loss of positivity as β decreases. In the present paper, we consider the following fractional analog of the thermostat model:
C D α u ( t ) = f ( t , u ( t ) ) , t [ 0 , 1 ] ,
(1)
where 1 < α 2 , D α C denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order α and f C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , ) , [ 0 , ) ) subject to the boundary conditions
u ( 0 ) = 0 , β C D α 1 u ( 1 ) + u ( η ) = 0 ,
(2)

where β > 0 , 0 η 1 are given constants.

We point out that for α = 2 , we recover the second-order problem of [13]. We use the properties of the corresponding Green’s function and the Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem to show the existence of positive solutions of (1)-(2) under the condition that the nonlinearity f is either sublinear or superlinear.

2 Preliminaries

Here we present some necessary basic knowledge and definitions for fractional calculus theory that can be found in the literature [13].

Definition 2.1 The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order α > 0 of a function g : ( 0 , ) R is given by
I α g ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t s ) α 1 g ( s ) d s

provided the integral exists.

Definition 2.2 The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order α > 0 of a function g : ( 0 , ) R is given by
D 0 + α g ( t ) = 1 Γ ( n α ) ( d d t ) n 0 t g ( s ) ( t s ) α n + 1 d s ( n 1 < α < n , n = [ α ] + 1 ) ,

where [ α ] denotes the integer part of the real number α.

Definition 2.3 The Caputo derivative of order α > 0 of a function g A C n 1 [ 0 , ) is given by
D α C g ( t ) = 1 Γ ( n α ) 0 t ( t s ) n α 1 g ( n ) ( s ) d s ( n 1 < α < n , n = [ α ] + 1 ) ,

where [ α ] denotes the integer part of the real number α.

Lemma 2.1 Let g L 1 ( 0 , 1 ) and α , β > 0 .
  1. (i)

    If α = n N , then I n g ( t ) = 1 ( n 1 ) ! 0 t ( t s ) n 1 g ( s ) d s .

     
  2. (ii)

    If α = n N , then D n C g ( t ) = g ( n ) ( t ) .

     
  3. (iii)

    D α C I α g ( t ) = g ( t ) .

     
  4. (iv)

    I α I β g ( t ) = I α + β g ( t ) .

     
Remark 2.1 In addition to the above properties, the Caputo derivative of a power function t k , k N , is given by
D α C t k = { Γ ( k + 1 ) Γ ( k α + 1 ) t k α , for  k > n 1 , 0 , for  k n 1 ,

where n 1 < α < n , n = [ α ] + 1 .

Lemma 2.2 For α > 0 , the general solution of the fractional differential equation D α C u ( t ) = 0 is given by
u ( t ) = c 0 + c 1 t + c 2 t 2 + + c n 1 t n 1 ,

where c i R , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , , n 1 ( n 1 < α < n , n = [ α ] + 1 ).

Lemma 2.3
I α C D α u ( t ) = u ( t ) + c 0 + c 1 t + c 2 t 2 + + c n 1 t n 1
(3)

for some c i R , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , , n 1 ( n 1 < α < n , n = [ α ] + 1 ).

We start by solving an auxiliary problem to get an expression for the Green’s function of boundary value problem (1)-(2).

Lemma 2.4 Suppose f C [ 0 , 1 ] . A function u C [ 0 , 1 ] is a solution of the boundary value problem
C D α u ( t ) = f ( t ) , u ( 0 ) = 0 , β C D α 1 u ( 1 ) + u ( η ) = 0 , t [ 0 , 1 ]
if and only if it satisfies the integral equation
u ( t ) = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s ) d s ,
where G ( t , s ) is the Green’s function (depending on α) given by
G ( t , s ) = β + H η ( s ) H t ( s )
(4)

and for r [ 0 , 1 ] , H r : [ 0 , 1 ] R is defined as H r ( s ) = ( r s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) for s r and H r ( s ) = 0 for s > r .

Proof Using (3) we have, for some constants c 0 , c 1 R ,
u ( t ) = I α f ( t ) + c 0 + c 1 t = 0 t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s ) d s + c 0 + c 1 t .
(5)
In view of Lemma 2.1, we obtain
u ( t ) = 0 t ( t s ) α 2 Γ ( α 1 ) f ( s ) d s + c 1 .

Since u ( 0 ) = 0 , we find that c 1 = 0 .

It also follows that
D α 1 C u ( t ) = I 1 u ( t ) .
Using the boundary condition β C D α 1 u ( 1 ) + u ( η ) = 0 , we get
c 0 = β 0 1 f ( s ) d s + 0 η ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s ) d s .
Finally, substituting the values of c 0 and c 1 in (5), we have
u ( t ) = β 0 1 f ( s ) d s + 0 η ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s ) d s 0 t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s ) d s = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s ) d s ,

where G ( t , s ) is given by (4). This completes the proof. □

Remark 2.2 We observe that H r is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] for any r [ 0 , 1 ] . Thus, G ( t , s ) given by (4) is continuous on [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] .

Remark 2.3 By taking α = 2 , we get
u ( t ) = β 0 1 f ( s ) d s + 0 1 ( η s ) f ( s ) d s 0 t ( t s ) f ( s ) d s = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s ) d s
and G ( t , s ) in this case coincides with the one obtained in [13] for the boundary value problem
u ( t ) = f ( t ) , u ( 0 ) = 0 , β u ( 1 ) + u ( η ) = 0 .
Remark 2.4 We observe that for each fixed point s [ 0 , 1 ] , G t = 0 for t s and G t < 0 for t > s and deduce that G ( t , s ) is a decreasing function of t. It then follows that
max t [ 0 , 1 ] G ( t , s ) = G ( 0 , s ) = { β , s > η , β Γ ( α ) + ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , s η ,
and
min t [ 0 , 1 ] G ( t , s ) = G ( 1 , s ) = { β Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , s > η , β Γ ( α ) + ( η s ) α 1 ( 1 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , s η .
Consequently, by looking at the behavior of G ( t , s ) with respect to s, we get
min t , s [ 0 , 1 ] G ( t , s ) = β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 Γ ( α )
and
max t , s [ 0 , 1 ] G ( t , s ) = β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) .
To establish the existence of positive solutions of problem (1)-(2), we will show that G ( t , s ) satisfies the following property introduced by Lan and Webb in [17]:
  1. (A)
    There exist a measurable function ϕ : [ 0 , 1 ] [ 0 , ) , a subinterval [ a , b ] [ 0 , 1 ] and a constant λ [ 0 , 1 ] such that
    | G ( t , s ) | ϕ ( s ) t , s [ 0 , 1 ]
     
and
G ( t , s ) λ ϕ ( s ) t [ a , b ] , s [ 0 , 1 ] .

Lemma 2.5 If β Γ ( α ) > ( 1 η ) α 1 , then G ( t , s ) > 0 for all t , s [ 0 , 1 ] , and G ( t , s ) satisfies property (A).

Proof If β Γ ( α ) > ( 1 η ) α 1 , then G ( t , s ) > 0 for all t , s [ 0 , 1 ] . We choose [ a , b ] = [ 0 , 1 ] , and we have
| G ( t , s ) | = G ( t , s ) β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) : = ϕ ( s )
and
G ( t , s ) λ ϕ ( s ) s , t [ 0 , 1 ] ,
where
λ = β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 .
(6)

 □

Lemma 2.6 If β Γ ( α ) = ( 1 η ) α 1 , then G ( t , s ) 0 for all t , s [ 0 , 1 ] , and G ( t , s ) satisfies property (A).

Proof We choose [ a , b ] = [ 0 , b ] with η b < 1 . Following the arguments in the previous lemma, we have
| G ( t , s ) | β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) : = ϕ ( s ) t , s [ 0 , 1 ] .
Also, by taking
λ = β Γ ( α ) ( b η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 ,
we obtain
G ( t , s ) λ ϕ ( s ) t [ 0 , b ] , s [ 0 , 1 ] .

 □

Lemma 2.7 If β Γ ( α ) < ( 1 η ) α 1 , then G ( t , s ) changes sign on [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] , and G ( t , s ) satisfies property (A).

Proof We choose [ a , b ] = [ 0 , b ] with η b < 1 such that β Γ ( α ) > ( b η ) α 1 . We have
| G ( t , s ) | max { β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) , ( 1 η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) Γ ( α ) } : = ϕ ( s ) t , s [ 0 , 1 ]
and
G ( t , s ) λ ϕ ( s ) t [ 0 , b ] , s [ 0 , 1 ] ,
where
λ = min { β Γ ( α ) ( b η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 , β Γ ( α ) ( b η ) α 1 ( 1 η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) } .

For the main results, we use the known Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem [18]. □

Theorem 2.1 Let E be a Banach space and let P E be a cone. Assume Ω 1 , Ω 2 are open bounded subsets of E such that 0 Ω 1 Ω ¯ 1 Ω 2 , and let T : P ( Ω ¯ 2 Ω 1 ) P be a completely continuous operator such that
  1. (i)

    T u u , u P Ω 1 and T u u , u P Ω 2 ; or

     
  2. (ii)

    T u u , u P Ω 1 and T u u , u P Ω 2 .

     

Then the operator P has a fixed point in P ( Ω ¯ 2 Ω 1 ) .

3 Main results

We set
f 0 = lim u 0 + min t [ 0 , 1 ] f ( t , u ) u , f 0 = lim u 0 + max t [ 0 , 1 ] f ( t , u ) u , f = lim u max t [ 0 , 1 ] f ( t , u ) u , f = lim u min t [ 0 , 1 ] f ( t , u ) u .

We now state the main result of this paper.

Theorem 3.1 Let f ( s , u ( s ) ) C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , ) , [ 0 , ) ) . Assume that one of the following conditions is satisfied:
  1. (i)

    (Sublinear case) f 0 = and f = 0 .

     
  2. (ii)

    (Superlinear case) f 0 = 0 and f = .

     

If β Γ ( α ) > ( 1 η ) α 1 , then problem (1)-(2) admits at least one positive solution.

Theorem 3.2 Let f ( s , u ( s ) ) C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × [ , + ) , [ 0 , ) ) . Assume that one of the following conditions is satisfied:
  1. (i)

    (Sublinear case) f 0 = and f = 0 .

     
  2. (ii)

    (Superlinear case) f 0 = 0 and f = .

     

If β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 , then problem (1)-(2) admits a solution which is positive on an interval [ 0 , b ] [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof of Theorem 3.1 Let C [ 0 , 1 ] be the Banach space of all continuous real-valued functions on [ 0 , 1 ] endowed with the usual supremum norm .

We define the operator T : C [ 0 , 1 ] C [ 0 , 1 ] as
T u ( t ) = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s ,

where G ( t , s ) is defined by (4).

It is clear from Lemma 2.4 that the fixed points of the operator T coincide with the solutions of problem (1)-(2).

We now define the cone
P = { u | u C [ 0 , 1 ] , u ( t ) 0 , min t [ 0 , 1 ] u ( t ) λ u } ,

where λ is given by (6).

First, we show that T ( P ) P .

It follows from the continuity and the non-negativity of the functions G and f on their domains of definition that if u P , then T u C [ 0 , 1 ] and T u ( t ) 0 for all t [ 0 , 1 ] .

For a fixed u P and for all t [ 0 , 1 ] , the fact that G ( t , s ) satisfies property (A) leads to the following inequalities:
T u ( t ) = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s λ 0 1 ϕ ( s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s λ 0 1 max t [ 0 , 1 ] G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s λ max t [ 0 , 1 ] 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s = λ T u .

Hence, T ( P ) P .

We now show that T : P P is completely continuous.

In view of the continuity of the functions G and f, the operator T : P P is continuous.

Let Ω P be bounded, that is, there exists a positive constant M > 0 such that u M for all u Ω . Define
L = max 0 t 1 , 0 u M | f ( t , u ) | + 1 .
Then for all u Ω , we have
| T u ( t ) | 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s L 0 1 G ( t , s ) d s

for all t [ 0 , 1 ] . That is, the set T ( Ω ) is bounded.

For each u Ω and t 1 , t 2 [ 0 , 1 ] such that t 1 < t 2 , we have
| T u ( t 2 ) T u ( t 1 ) | = | 0 t 2 ( t 2 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s + 0 t 1 ( t 1 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s | 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t 1 ( ( t 2 s ) α 1 ( t 1 s ) α 1 ) | f ( s , u ( s ) ) | d s + 1 Γ ( α ) t 1 t 2 ( t 2 s ) α 1 | f ( s , u ( s ) ) | d s L Γ ( α ) ( 0 t 1 ( ( t 2 s ) α 1 ( t 1 s ) α 1 ) d s + t 1 t 2 ( t 2 s ) α 1 d s ) = L α Γ ( α ) ( ( t 2 t 1 ) α + t 2 α t 1 α + ( t 2 t 1 ) α ) = L Γ ( α + 1 ) ( t 2 α t 1 α ) .

Clearly, the right-hand side of the above inequalities tends to 0 as t 1 t 2 and therefore the set T ( Ω ) is equicontinuous. It follows from the Arzela-Ascoli theorem that the operator T : P P is completely continuous.

We now consider the two cases.
  1. (i)

    Sublinear case ( f 0 = and f = 0 ).

     
Since f 0 = , there exists ρ 1 > 0 such that f ( t , u ) δ 1 u for all 0 < u ρ 1 , where δ 1 satisfies
δ 1 ( β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 Γ ( α ) ) 1 .
(7)
We take u P such that u = ρ 1 , then we have the following inequalities:
T u = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s δ 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s δ 1 u ( β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 Γ ( α ) ) u .

Let Ω 1 = { u C [ 0 , 1 ] | u < ρ 1 } . Hence, we have T u u , u P Ω 1 .

Since f ( t , ) is a continuous function on [ 0 , ) , we can define the function:
f ˜ ( t , u ) = max z [ 0 , u ] { f ( t , z ) } .
It is clear that f ˜ ( t , u ) is non-decreasing on ( 0 , ) and since f = 0 , we have (see [19])
lim u { max t [ 0 , 1 ] f ˜ ( t , u ) u } = 0 .
Therefore, there exists ρ 2 > ρ 1 > 0 such that f ˜ ( t , u ) δ 2 u for all u ρ 2 , where δ 2 satisfies
δ 2 ( β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) ) 1 .
(8)
Define Ω 2 = { u C [ 0 , 1 ] | u < ρ 2 } and let u P such that u = ρ 2 . Then
T u = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ˜ ( s , u ) d s δ 2 u ( β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) ) u .

Hence, we have T u u , u P Ω 2 .

Thus, by the first part of the Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem, we conclude that (1)-(2) has at least one positive solution.
  1. (ii)

    Superlinear case ( f 0 = 0 and f = ).

     

Let δ 2 > 0 be given as in (8).

Since f 0 = 0 , there exists a constant r 1 > 0 such that f ( t , u ) δ 2 u for 0 u r 1 . Take u P such that u = r 1 . Then we have
T u = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s δ 2 0 1 G ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s δ 2 u ( β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 Γ ( α ) ) u .

If we let Ω 1 = { u C [ 0 , 1 ] | u < r 1 } , we see that T u u for u P Ω 1 .

Now, since f = , there exists r > 0 such that f ( t , u ) δ 1 u for all u r , where δ 1 is as in (7).

Define Ω 2 = { u C [ 0 , 1 ] | u < r 2 } , where r 2 = max ( 2 r 1 , r λ ) . Then u P and u = r 2 imply that
min u ( t ) λ u = λ r 2 r ,
and so we obtain
T u = 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s δ 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) u ( s ) d s δ 1 u ( β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 Γ ( α ) ) u .

This shows that T u u for u P Ω 2 . We conclude by the second part of the Guo-Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem that (1)-(2) has at least one positive solution u P ( Ω ¯ 2 Ω 1 ) . □

Remark 3.1

To prove Theorem 3.2, we use the cone
P = { u | u C [ 0 , 1 ] , min t [ 0 , b ] u ( t ) λ u } ,

where b and λ are defined in Lemma 2.6 for the case where β Γ ( α ) = ( 1 η ) α 1 , and in Lemma 2.7 for the case where β Γ ( α ) < ( 1 η ) α 1 . We skip the rest of the proof as it is similar to the proof of Theorem 3.1.

Example 3.1

Consider the fractional boundary value problem:
{ C D 3 2 u ( t ) = t 2 e u ( t ) + u ( t ) , t [ 0 , 1 ] , u ( 0 ) = 0 , 4 5 C D 1 2 u ( 1 ) + u ( 3 4 ) = 0 ,
(9)

which is problem (1)-(2) with α = 3 2 , β = 4 5 , η = 3 4 and f ( t , u ( t ) ) = t 2 e u ( t ) + u ( t ) .

First, we note that u = 0 is not a solution of (9).

Clearly, f 0 = and f = 0 , and we also have β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 = 2 π 5 1 2 0.20898 > 0 .

We take
λ = β Γ ( α ) ( 1 η ) α 1 β Γ ( α ) + η α 1 = 2 π 5 1 2 2 π 5 + 3 2 = 4 π 5 4 π + 5 3 0.13269

and consider the cone P = { u | u C [ 0 , 1 ] , u ( t ) 0 , min t [ 0 , 1 ] u ( t ) λ u } .

By the first part of Theorem 3.1, we conclude that the boundary value problem (9) has a positive solution in the cone P.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Jean Mawhin for his 70th anniversary.

The research has been partially supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, and FEDER, project MTM2010-15314.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Análisis Matemático, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University

References

  1. Kilbas A, Srivastava HM, Trujillo J North Holland Mathematics Studies 204. In Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. Samko S, Kilbas A, Maričev O: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Gordon & Breach, New York; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad B, Agarwal R: On nonlocal fractional boundary value problems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst., Ser. A, Math. Anal. 2011, 18: 535-544.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems with nonlinear term depending on lower order derivative. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2012, 15: 451-462.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations with three-point boundary conditions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58: 1838-1843. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.091MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ, Alsaedi A, El-Shahed M: A study of nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders in different intervals. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2012, 13(2):599-606. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.07.052MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differential equations with fractional nonlocal integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 36Google Scholar
  9. Bai Z, Lu H: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 311(2):495-505. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.052MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Benchohra M, Cabada A, Seba D: An existence result for nonlinear fractional differential equations on Banach spaces. Bound. Value Probl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 628916Google Scholar
  11. Cabada A, Wang G: Positive solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations with integral boundary value conditions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 389: 403-411. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.11.065MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang S: Positive solutions for boundary-value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2006, 2006: 1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Infante G, Webb J: Loss of positivity in a nonlinear scalar heat equation. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 2006, 13: 249-261. 10.1007/s00030-005-0039-yMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Infante G, Webb J: Nonzero solutions of Hammerstein integral equations with discontinuous kernels. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 272: 30-42. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00125-7MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems: a unified approach. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2006, 74(3):673-693. 10.1112/S0024610706023179MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guidotti P, Merino S: Gradual loss of positivity and hidden invariant cones in a scalar heat equation. Differ. Integral Equ. 2000, 13(10/12):1551-1568.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Lan K, Webb J: Positive solutions of semilinear differential equations with singularities. J. Differ. Equ. 1998, 148(2):407-421. 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3475MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo D, Lakshmikanthan V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones. Academic Press, New York; 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang H: On the number of positive solutions of nonlinear systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2003, 281: 287-306. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00100-8MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nieto and Pimentel; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.