 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
Existence of Nontrivial Solution for a Nonlocal Elliptic Equation with Nonlinear Boundary Condition
Boundary Value Problems volume 2009, Article number: 540360 (2009)
Abstract
In this paper, we establish two different existence results of solutions for a nonlocal elliptic equations with nonlinear boundary condition. The first one is based on Galerkin method, and gives a priori estimate. The second one is based on Mountain Pass Lemma.
1. Introduction
In this paper, we deal with the following elliptic equation with nonlinear boundary condition:
where is a bounded domain in with smooth boundary , , is the outer unite normal derivative, is continuous, , are Carathéodory functions.
For (1.1), if the nonlocal term is replaced by , then the equation
is related to the stationary analog of the Kirchhoff equation:
where . It was proposed by Kirchhoff [1] as an extension of the classical D'Alembert wave equations for free vibrations of elastic strings. The Kirchhoff model takes into account the length changes of the string produced by transverse vibrations. Equation (1.3) received much attention and an abstract framework to the problem was proposed after the work [2]. Some interesting and further results can be found in [3, 4] and the references therein. In addition, (1.2) has important physical and biological background. There are many authors who pay more attention to this equation. In particularly, authors concerned with the existence of solutions for (1.2) with zero Dirichlet boundary condition via Galerkin method, and built the variational frame in [5, 6]. More recently, Perera and Zhang obtained solutions of a class of nonlocal quasilinear elliptic boundary value problems using the variational methods, invariant sets of descent flow, Yang index, and critical groups [7, 8].
If the nonlocal term is replaced by , then the equation
arises in numerous physical models such as systems of particles in thermodynamical equilibrium via gravitational (Coulomb) potential, 2D fully turbulent behavior of real flow, thermal runaway in Ohmic Heating, shear bands in metal deformed under high strain rates, among others. Because of its importance, in [9, 10], the authors similarly studied the existence of solution for (1.4) with zero Dirichlet boundary condition.
On the other hand, elliptic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions have become rather an active area of research; see [11–15] and reference therein. Those references present necessary and sufficient conditions of solutions of elliptic equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. In [13], the authors study the elliptic equation
with the nonlinear boundary condition
They obtain various existence results applying coincidence degree theory and the method of upper and lower solutions.
Inspired by the above references, we deal with the existence of solutions for elliptic equation (1.1) with nonlinear boundary condition based on Galerkin method and the Mountain Pass Lemma.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we will give the existence of solution for (1.1) via Galerkin method. In Section 3, we will study the solution for (1.1) using the Mountain Pass Lemma.
2. Existence
In this section, we state and prove the main theorem via Galerkin method when is bounded.
For convenience, we give the following hypotheses.
(H1)A typical assumption for is that there exists an such that , for all
(H2) For all , assume that the functions , satisfying
where are constants, , .
(H3) The function is not identically zero.
Let be endowed with norm . Then is a Banach space.
A function is a weak solution of (1.1) if
for all .
Lemma 2.1.
Suppose that is a continuous function such that on , where is the usual inner product in and its related norm. Then, there exists such that .
Lemma 2.2 (see [16]).
Let be a domain in satisfying the uniform regularity condition, and suppose that there exists a simple extension operator for . Also suppose that and . Then
If , then the embedding still holds for . Moreover, if , then the embedding is compact.
Theorem 2.3.
Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold. In addition, we suppose that
(H4)there exist constants such that , , with
Then problem (1.1) has at least one weak solution. Besides, any solution satisfies the estimate
Proof.
Let be different complete orthonormal systems for and set
Then is isometric to . Then, each is uniquely associated to by the relation . Since are, respectively, orthonormal in , we get .
We search for solutions of the approximate problem
To solve this algebraic system we define the operator
By condition (H2), the growth of function is subcritical, so defines a continuous Nemytskii mapping . Similarly, we also define a continuous mapping .
From the continuity of and , with respect to , we denote that is continuous. Therefore, from (H1), (H2), (H4) and Hölder's inequality, we note that
On the other hand, by Lemma 2.2, we have
where is constant.
From (2.9) and (2.10), we can prove that
This shows that there exists , depending only on , such that if . Then system (2.7) has a solution satisfying
From this bound estimate, going to a subsequence if necessary, there are and such that
Besides, since , compactly and the mapping is, respectively, continuous and
Then fixing in (2.7) and letting , we conclude that
From the completeness of , identity holds with replaced by any . In particularly, when , we get
On the other hand, let in (2.7) and passing to the limit, we get
Then we conclude that , which shows that is a solution of (1.1). Finally, if is any solution of (1.1) and is nontrivial, then
The proof is complete.
3. Variational Method
In this section, we consider the following problem:
where are constants, and are defined in (H2).
The nontrivial solution of (3.1) comes from the Mountain Pass Lemma in [17].
Lemma 3.1 (Mountain Pass Lemma).
Let be a Banach space and let satisfy the PalaisSmale condition. Suppose also that
(i)

(ii)
there exist constants such that , if ,

(iii)
there exists an element with .
Define . Then
is a critical value of .
Theorem 3.2.
Assume the conditions (H1)–(H3) hold. In addition, the function satisfies
(H5)there exist with and , such that , , where .
Then (3.1) has a nontrivial solution.
Proof.
The weak solutions of (3.1) are critical points of the functional defined by
where .
Let us check the condition. Let , we have
Let be a PalaisSmale sequence in , that is, and and assume the contradiction that , then, from (H1), (H5), we have
where . Then by the Sobolev embedding theorem and Lemma 2.2, we can select such that
which is a contradiction with . Hence is bounded in . So admits a weakly convergence subsequence. From (H2), all the growth of is subcritical, so the standard argument shows that admits a strongly convergence subsequence.
Next we will verify the hypotheses of Lemma 3.1. By Hölder's inequality, Sobolev embedding theorem, and Lemma 2.2, we have
So we obtain
Let , we get
Let , then we take such that , when is sufficient small.
So for and small enough, then we have for all .
On the other hand, take with for , we have
Since , we obtain when .
Let , with large enough, we have and . So by the Mountain Pass Lemma and (H3), we have a nontrivial solution for (3.1). The proof is complete.
References
 1.
Kirchhoff G: Mechanik. Teubner, Leipzig, Germany; 1883.
 2.
Lions JL: On some questions in boundary value problems of mathematical physics. In Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations (Proc. Internat. Sympos., Inst. Mat., Univ. Fed. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1977), NorthHolland Mathematics Studies. Volume 30. Edited by: de la Penha G, Medeiros LA. NorthHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1978:284–346.
 3.
Arosio A, Panizzi S: On the wellposedness of the Kirchhoff string. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1996, 348(1):305–330. 10.1090/S0002994796015322
 4.
Ono K: On global solutions and blowup solutions of nonlinear Kirchhoff strings with nonlinear dissipation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1997, 216(1):321–342. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5697
 5.
Aives CO, Corrêa FJSA, Ma TF: Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2005, 49(1):85–93. 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.01.008
 6.
Ma TF: Remarks on an elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2005, 63(5–7):e1967e1977.
 7.
Perera K, Zhang Z: Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhofftype problems via the Yang index. Journal of Differential Equations 2006, 221(1):246–255. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.03.006
 8.
Zhang Z, Perera K: Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff type problems via invariant sets of descent flow. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 317(2):456–463. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.102
 9.
Stańczy R: Nonlocal elliptic equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2001, 47(5):3579–3584. 10.1016/S0362546X(01)004783
 10.
Corrêa FJSA, de Morais Filho DC: On a class of nonlocal elliptic problems via Galerkin method. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005, 310(1):177–187. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.01.052
 11.
Bonder JF, Rossi JD: Existence results for the Laplacian with nonlinear boundary conditions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2001, 263(1):195–223. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7609
 12.
Chaïb K: Necessary and sufficient conditions of existence for a system involving the Laplacian . Journal of Differential Equations 2003, 189(2):513–525. 10.1016/S00220396(02)000943
 13.
Amster P, Mariani MC, Méndez O: Nonlinear boundary conditions for elliptic equations. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations 2005, 2005(144):1–8.
 14.
Song SZ, Tang CL: Resonance problems for the Laplacian with a nonlinear boundary condition. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2006, 64(9):2007–2021. 10.1016/j.na.2005.07.035
 15.
Zhao JH, Zhao PH: Existence of infinitely many weak solutions for the Laplacian with nonlinear boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008, 69(4):1343–1355. 10.1016/j.na.2007.06.036
 16.
Adams RA, Fournier JJF: Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2003.
 17.
Evans LC: Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA; 1998.
Author information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Weak Solution
 Elliptic Equation
 Galerkin Method
 Dirichlet Boundary Condition
 Nontrivial Solution