- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Uniqueness and Parameter Dependence of Positive Solution of Fourth-Order Nonhomogeneous BVPs

*Boundary Value Problems*
**volumeÂ 2010**, ArticleÂ number:Â 106962 (2010)

## Abstract

We investigate the following fourth-order four-point nonhomogeneous Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem: , , , where and are nonnegative parameters. Some sufficient conditions are given for the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution. The dependence of the solution on the parameters is also studied.

## 1. Introduction

Boundary value problems (BVPs for short) consisting of fourth-order differential equation and four-point homogeneous boundary conditions have received much attention due to their striking applications. For example, Chen et al. [1] studied the fourth-order nonlinear differential equation

with the four-point homogeneous boundary conditions

where . By means of the upper and lower solution method and Schauder fixed point theorem, some criteria on the existence of positive solutions to the BVP (1.1)â€“(1.3) were established. Bai et al. [2] obtained the existence of solutions for the BVP (1.1)â€“(1.3) by using a nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type. For other related results, one can refer to [3â€“5] and the references therein.

Recently, nonhomogeneous BVPs have attracted many authors' attention. For instance, Ma [6, 7] and L. Kong and Q. Kong [8â€“10] studied some second-order multipoint nonhomogeneous BVPs. In particular, L. Kong and Q. Kong [10] considered the following second-order BVP with multipoint nonhomogeneous boundary conditions

where and are nonnegative parameters. They derived some conditions for the above BVP to have a unique solution and then studied the dependence of this solution on the parameters and . Sun [11] discussed the existence and nonexistence of positive solutions to a class of third-order three-point nonhomogeneous BVP. The authors in [12] studied the multiplicity of positive solutions for some fourth-order two-point nonhomogeneous BVP by using a fixed point theorem of cone expansion/compression type. For more recent results on higher-order BVPs with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, one can see [13â€“16].

Inspired greatly by the above-mentioned excellent works, in this paper we are concerned with the following Sturm-Liouville BVP consisting of the fourth-order differential equation:

and the four-point nonhomogeneous boundary conditions

where and are nonnegative parameters. Under the following assumptions:

(A1) and are nonnegative constants with , , , , and

(A2) is continuous and monotone increasing in for every ;

(A3) there exists such that

we prove the uniqueness of positive solution for the BVP (1.5)â€“(1.7) and study the dependence of this solution on the parameters .

## 2. Preliminary Lemmas

First, we recall some fundamental definitions.

Definition 2.1.

Let be a Banach space with norm . Then

(1) a nonempty closed convex set is said to be a cone if for all and , where is the zero element of

(2) every cone in defines a partial ordering in by

(3) a cone is said to be normal if there exists such that implies that

(4) a cone is said to be solid if the interior of is nonempty.

Definition 2.2.

Let be a solid cone in a real Banach space an operator, and Then is called a -concave operator if

Next, we state a fixed point theorem, which is our main tool.

Lemma 2.3 (see [17]).

Assume that is a normal solid cone in a real Banach space and is a -concave increasing operator. Then has a unique fixed point in

The following two lemmas are crucial to our main results.

Lemma 2.4.

Assume that and are defined as in (A1) and . Then for any the BVP consisting of the equation

and the boundary conditions (1.6) and (1.7) has a unique solution

where

Proof.

Let

Then

By (2.5) and (1.6), we know that

On the other hand, in view of (2.5) and (1.7), we have

So, it follows from (2.6) and (2.8) that

which together with (2.7) implies that

Lemma 2.5.

Assume that (A1) holds. Then

(1) for

(2) for

(3) for

## 3. Main Result

For convenience, we denote and . In the remainder of this paper, the following notations will be used:

(1) if at least one of approaches ;

(2) if for ;

(3) if for and at least one of them is strict.

Let . Then is a Banach space, where is defined as usual by the sup norm.

Our main result is the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1.

Assume that (A1)â€“(A3) hold. Then the BVP (1.5)â€“(1.7) has a unique positive solution for any , where . Furthermore, such a solution satisfies the following properties:

(P1)

(P2) is strictly increasing in , that is,

(P3) is continuous in , that is, for any given

Proof.

Let . Then is a normal solid cone in with For any , if we define an operator as follows:

then it is not difficult to verify that is a positive solution of the BVP (1.5)â€“(1.7) if and only if is a fixed point of .

Now, we will prove that has a unique fixed point by using Lemma 2.3.

First, in view of Lemma 2.5, we know that

Next, we claim that is a -concave operator.

In fact, for any and it follows from (3.3) and (A3) that

which shows that is -concave.

Finally, we assert that is an increasing operator.

Suppose that and By (3.3) and (A2), we have

which indicates that is increasing.

Therefore, it follows from Lemma 2.3 that has a unique fixed point which is the unique positive solution of the BVP (1.5)â€“(1.7). The first part of the theorem is proved.

In the rest of the proof, we will prove that such a positive solution satisfies properties (P1), (P2), and (P3).

First,

which together with for implies (P1).

Next, we show (P2). Assume that Let

Then for We assert that Suppose on the contrary that Since is a -concave increasing operator and for given , is strictly increasing in , we have

which contradicts the definition of Thus, we get for And so,

which indicates that is strictly increasing in .

Finally, we prove (P3). For any given we first suppose that with From (P2), we know that

Let

Then and for If we define

then and

which together with the definition of implies that

So,

Therefore,

In view of (3.10) and (3.16), we obtain that

which together with the fact that as shows that

Similarly, we can also prove that

Hence, (P3) holds.

## References

Chen S, Ni W, Wang C:

**Positive solution of fourth order ordinary differential equation with four-point boundary conditions.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2006,**19**(2):161-168. 10.1016/j.aml.2005.05.002Bai C, Yang D, Zhu H:

**Existence of solutions for fourth order differential equation with four-point boundary conditions.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2007,**20**(11):1131-1136. 10.1016/j.aml.2006.11.013Graef JR, Yang B:

**Positive solutions of a nonlinear fourth order boundary value problem.***Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis*2007,**14**(1):61-73.Wu H, Zhang J:

**Positive solutions of higher-order four-point boundary value problem with****-Laplacian operator.***Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*2010,**233**(11):2757-2766. 10.1016/j.cam.2009.06.040Zhao J, Ge W:

**Positive solutions for a higher-order four-point boundary value problem with a****-Laplacian.***Computers & Mathematics with Applications*2009,**58**(6):1103-1112. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.04.022Ma R:

**Positive solutions for second-order three-point boundary value problems.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2001,**14**(1):1-5. 10.1016/S0893-9659(00)00102-6Ma R:

**Positive solutions for nonhomogeneous****-point boundary value problems.***Computers & Mathematics with Applications*2004,**47**(4-5):689-698. 10.1016/S0898-1221(04)90056-9Kong L, Kong Q:

**Second-order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. I.***Mathematische Nachrichten*2005,**278**(1-2):173-193. 10.1002/mana.200410234Kong L, Kong Q:

**Second-order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. II.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007,**330**(2):1393-1411. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.064Kong L, Kong Q:

**Uniqueness and parameter dependence of solutions of second-order boundary value problems.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2009,**22**(11):1633-1638. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.05.009Sun Y:

**Positive solutions for third-order three-point nonhomogeneous boundary value problems.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2009,**22**(1):45-51. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.02.002do Ã“ JM, Lorca S, Ubilla P:

**Multiplicity of solutions for a class of non-homogeneous fourth-order boundary value problems.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2008,**21**(3):279-286. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.025Graef JR, Kong L, Kong Q, Wong JSW:

**Higher order multi-point boundary value problems with sign-changing nonlinearities and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions.***Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations*2010,**2010**(28):1-40.Kong L, Kong Q:

**Higher order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(1):240-261. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.050Kong L, Piao D, Wang L:

**Positive solutions for third order boundary value problems with****-Laplacian.***Results in Mathematics*2009,**55**(1-2):111-128. 10.1007/s00025-009-0383-zKong L, Wong JSW:

**Positive solutions for higher order multi-point boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2010,**367**(2):588-611. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.01.063Guo DJ, Lakshmikantham V:

*Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, Notes and Reports in Mathematics in Science and Engineering*.*Volume 5*. Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA; 1988:viii+275.

## Acknowledgment

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10801068).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Sun, JP., Wang, XY. Uniqueness and Parameter Dependence of Positive Solution of Fourth-Order Nonhomogeneous BVPs.
*Bound Value Probl* **2010**, 106962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/106962

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/106962