- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Existence and Uniqueness of Periodic Solution for Nonlinear Second-Order Ordinary Differential Equations

*Boundary Value Problems*
**volumeÂ 2011**, ArticleÂ number:Â 192156 (2011)

## Abstract

We study periodic solutions for nonlinear second-order ordinary differential problem . By constructing upper and lower boundaries and using Leray-Schauder degree theory, we present a result about the existence and uniqueness of a periodic solution for second-order ordinary differential equations with some assumption.

## 1. Introduction

The study on periodic solutions for ordinary differential equations is a very important branch in the differential equation theory. Many results about the existence of periodic solutions for second-order differential equations have been obtained by combining the classical method of lower and upper solutions and the method of alternative problems (The Lyapunov-Schmidt method) as discussed by many authors [1â€“10]. In [11], the author gives a simple method to discuss the existence and uniqueness of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems. In this paper, we will extend this method to the periodic problem.

We consider the second-order ordinary differential equation

Throughout this paper, we will study the existence of periodic solutions of (1.1) with the following assumptions:

are continuous in , and

where is some positive integer,

The following is our main result.

Theorem 1.1.

Assume that and hold, then (1.1) has a unique periodic solution.

## 2. Basic Lemmas

The following results will be used later.

Lemma 2.1 (see [12]).

Let with

then

and the constant is optimal.

Lemma 2.2 (see [12]).

Let with the boundary value conditions , then

Consider the periodic boundary value problem

Lemma 2.3.

Suppose that are -integrable periodic function, where satisfy the condition (H_{2}), with

then (2.4) has only the trivial -periodic solution .

Proof.

If on the contrary, (2.4) has a nonzero -periodic solution , then using (2.4), we have

where is undetermined.

Firstly, we prove that has at least one zero in . If , we may assume . Since is a -periodic solution, there exists a with . Then,

we could get a contradiction.

Without loss of generality, we may assume that ; then there exists a sufficiently small such that . Since is a continuous function, there must exist a with .

Secondly, we prove that has at least zeros on . Considering the initial value problem

Obviously,

is the solution of (2.8) and

where with . Since

holds under the assumptions of , there is a , such that

Now, let . By the conditions (H_{2}), (2.11), and (2.12), we have

Since is decreasing in , we have . Therefore,

We also consider the initial value problem

Clearly,

is the solution of (2.16), where is the same as the previous one, and

Hence, there exists a with , such that

Then,

From (2.12) and (2.19), it follows that

By and (2.21), we have

Since is decreasing on , we have , and

We now prove that has a zero point in . If on the contrary for , then we would have the following inequalities:

In fact, from(2.4), (2.8), and (2.15), we have

with . Setting , and since

we obtain

Notice that , which implies

So, we have

Integrating from 0 to , we obtain

Therefore,

which implies (2.24). By a similar argument, we have (2.25). Therefore, , a contradiction, which shows that has at least one zero in , with .

We let . If , then from a similar argument, there is a , such that and so on. So, we obtain that has at least zeros on .

Thirdly, we prove that has at least zeros on . If, on the contrary, we assume that only has zeros on , we write them as

Obviously,

Without loss of generality, we may assume that . Since

we obtain , which contradicts . Therefore, has at least zeros on .

Finally, we prove Lemma 2.3. Since has at least zeros on , there are two zeros and with . By Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, we have

From , it follows that

Hence,

which implies for . Also . Therefore, for, a contradiction. The proof is complete.

## 3. Proof of Theorem 1.1

Firstly, we prove the existence of the solution. Consider the homotopy equation

where and . When , it holds (1.1). We assume that is the fundamental solution matrix of with . Equation (3.1) can be transformed into the integral equation

From , is a periodic solution of (3.2), then

For is invertible,

We substitute (3.4) into (3.2),

Define an operator

such that

Clearly, is a completely continuous operator in .

There exists , such that every possible periodic solution satisfies ( denote the usual normal in . If not, there exists and the solution with .

We can rewrite (3.1) in the following form:

Let , obviously . It satisfies the following problem:

in which we have

Since , are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous, there exists continuous function , and a subsequence of (denote it again by ), such that ,â€‰ uniformly in . Using and , and are uniformly bounded. By the Hahn-Banach theorem, there exists integrable function ,, and a subsequence of (denote it again by ), such that

where denotes "weakly converges to" in . As a consequence, we have

that is,

Denote that , , then we get

which also satisfy the condition . Notice that and are integrable on , so satisfies Lemma 2.3. Hence, we have , which contradicts . Therefore, is bounded.

Denote

Because for , by Leray-Schauder degree theory, we have

So, we conclude that has at least one fixed point in , that is, (1.1) has at least one solution.

Finally, we prove the uniqueness of the equation when the condition and holds. Let and be two -periodic solutions of the problem. Denote , then is a solution of the following problem:

By Lemma 2.3, we have for .

Let . We have

with . Denote by . So, is the solution of the problem (1.1). The proof is complete.

## 4. An Example

Consider the system

where is a continuous function. Obviously,

satisfy Theorem 1.1, then there is a unique -periodic solution in this system.

## References

Bereanu C, Mawhin J:Existence and multiplicity results for some nonlinear problems with singular -Laplacian.

*Journal of Differential Equations*2007, 243(2):536-557. 10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.014Ehme J, Eloe PW, Henderson J: Upper and lower solution methods for fully nonlinear boundary value problems.

*Journal of Differential Equations*2002, 180(1):51-64. 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4056Kannan R, Lakshmikantham V: Existence of periodic solutions of nonlinear boundary value problems and the method of upper and lower solutions.

*Applicable Analysis*1983, 17(2):103-113.Knobloch H-W: On the existence of periodic solutions for second order vector differential equations.

*Journal of Differential Equations*1971, 9: 67-85.Knobloch HW, Schmitt K: Non-linear boundary value problems for systems of differential equations.

*Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A*1977, 78(1-2):139-159.Liu Y, Ge W: Positive periodic solutions of nonlinear Duffing equations with delay and variable coefficients.

*Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences*2004, 20(2):235-255.Ortega R, Tarallo M: Almost periodic upper and lower solutions.

*Journal of Differential Equations*2003, 193(2):343-358. 10.1016/S0022-0396(03)00130-XRachÅ¯nkovÃ¡ I, TvrdÃ½ M: Existence results for impulsive second-order periodic problems.

*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*2004, 59(1-2):133-146.Schmitt K: Periodic solutions of linear second order differential equations with deviating argument.

*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1970, 26: 282-285. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1970-0265722-5SÄ™dziwy S: Nonlinear periodic boundary value problem for a second order ordinary differential equation.

*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*1998, 32(7):881-890. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00533-6Li Y: Boundary value problems for nonlinear ordinary differential equations.

*Northeastern Mathematical Journal*1990, 6(3):297-302.MitrinoviÄ‡ DS:

*Analytic Inequalities*. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1970:xii+400.

## Acknowledgments

The author expresses sincere thanks to Professor Yong Li for useful discussion. He would like to thank the reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Zu, J. Existence and Uniqueness of Periodic Solution for Nonlinear Second-Order Ordinary Differential Equations.
*Bound Value Probl* **2011**, 192156 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/192156

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/192156