- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Second-Order Boundary Value Problem with Integral Boundary Conditions

*Boundary Value Problems*
**volume 2011**, Article number: 260309 (2011)

## Abstract

The nonlinear alternative of the Leray Schauder type and the Banach contraction principle are used to investigate the existence of solutions for second-order differential equations with integral boundary conditions. The compactness of solutions set is also investigated.

## 1. Introduction

This paper is concerned with the existence of solutions for the second-order boundary value problem

where is a given function and is an integrable function.

Boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions constitute a very interesting and important class of problems. They include two, three, multipoint, and nonlocal boundary value problems as special cases. For boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions and comments on their importance, we refer the reader to the papers [1–9] and the references therein. Moreover, boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions have been studied by a number of authors, for example [10–14]. The goal of this paper is to give existence and uniqueness results for the problem (1.1). Our approach here is based on the Banach contraction principle and the Leray-Schauder alternative [15].

## 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce notations, definitions, and preliminary facts that will be used in the remainder of this paper. Let be the space of differentiable functions whose first derivative, , is absolutely continuous.

We take to be the Banach space of all continuous functions from into with the norm

and we let denote the Banach space of functions that are Lebesgue integrable with norm

Definition 2.1.

A map is said to be -Carathéodory if

(i) is measurable for each

(ii) is continuous for almost each

(iii)for every there exists such that

## 3. Existence and Uniqueness Results

Definition 3.1.

A function is said to be a solution of (1.1) if satisfies (1.1).

In what follows one assumes that One needs the following auxiliary result.

Lemma 3.2.

. Let . Then the function defined by

is the unique solution of the boundary value problem

where

Proof.

Let be a solution of the problem (3.2). Then integratingly, we obtain

Hence

where

Now, multiply (3.6) by and integrate over , to get

Thus,

Substituting in (3.6) we have

Therefore

Set Note that

Our first result reads

Theorem 3.3.

Assume that is an -Carathéodory function and the following hypothesis

(A1) There exists such that

holds. If

then the BVP (1.1) has a unique solution.

Proof.

Transform problem (1.1) into a fixed-point problem. Consider the operator defined by

We will show that is a contraction. Indeed, consider Then we have for each

Therefore

showing that, is a contraction and hence it has a unique fixed point which is a solution to (1.1). The proof is completed.

We now present an existence result for problem (1.1).

Theorem 3.4.

Suppose that hypotheses

(H1) The function is an -Carathéodory,

(H2) There exist functions and such that

are satisfied. Then the BVP (1.1) has at least one solution. Moreover the solution set

is compact.

Proof.

Transform the BVP (1.1) into a fixed-point problem. Consider the operator as defined in Theorem 3.3. We will show that satisfies the assumptions of the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type. The proof will be given in several steps.

Step 1 ( is continuous).

Let be a sequence such that in Then

Since is -Carathéodory and then

Hence

Step 2 ( maps bounded sets into bounded sets in ).

Indeed, it is enough to show that there exists a positive constant such that for each one has .

Let . Then for each , we have

By (H2) we have for each

Then for each we have

Step 3 ( maps bounded set into equicontinuous sets of ).

Let , and be a bounded set of as in Step 2. Let and we have

As the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero. Then is equicontinuous. As a consequence of Steps 1 to 3 together with the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we can conclude that is completely continuous.

Step 4 (A priori bounds on solutions).

Let for some . This implies by that for each we have

Then

If we have

Thus

Hence

Set

and consider the operator From the choice of , there is no such that for some As a consequence of the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type [15], we deduce that has a fixed point in which is a solution of the problem (1.1).

Now, prove that is compact. Let be a sequence in , then

As in Steps 3 and 4 we can easily prove that there exists such that

and the set is equicontinuous in hence by Arzela-Ascoli theorem we can conclude that there exists a subsequence of converging to in Using that fast that is an -Carathédory we can prove that

Thus is compact.

## 4. Examples

We present some examples to illustrate the applicability of our results.

Example 4.1.

Consider the following BVP

Set

We can easily show that conditions (A1), (3.14) are satisfied with

Hence, by Theorem 3.3, the BVP (4.1) has a unique solution on .

Example 4.2.

Consider the following BVP

Set

We can easily show that conditions (H1), (H2) are satisfied with

Hence, by Theorem 3.4, the BVP (4.4) has at least one solution on . Moreover, its solutions set is compact.

## References

Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: Existence results for nonlinear boundary value problems of fractional integrodifferential equations with integral boundary conditions.

*Boundary Value Problems*2009, 2009:-11.Belarbi A, Benchohra M: Existence results for nonlinear boundary-value problems with integral boundary conditions.

*Electronic Journal of Differential Equations*2005, 2005(06):10 .Belarbi A, Benchohra M, Ouahab A: Multiple positive solutions for nonlinear boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions.

*Archivum Mathematicum*2008, 44(1):1-7.Benchohra M, Hamani S, Nieto JJ: The method of upper and lower solutions for second order differential inclusions with integral boundary conditions.

*The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics*2010, 40(1):13-26. 10.1216/RMJ-2010-40-1-13Infante G: Nonlocal boundary value problems with two nonlinear boundary conditions.

*Communications in Applied Analysis*2008, 12(3):279-288.Lomtatidze A, Malaguti L: On a nonlocal boundary value problem for second order nonlinear singular differential equations.

*Georgian Mathematical Journal*2000, 7(1):133-154.Webb JRL: Positive solutions of some higher order nonlocal boundary value problems.

*Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations*2009, (29):-15.Webb JRL: A unified approach to nonlocal boundary value problems. In

*Dynamic Systems and Applications. Vol. 5*. Dynamic, Atlanta, Ga, USA; 2008:510-515.Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems: a unified approach.

*Journal of the London Mathematical Society*2006, 74(3):673-693. 10.1112/S0024610706023179Brykalov SA: A second order nonlinear problem with two-point and integral boundary conditions.

*Georgian Mathematical Journal*1994, 1: 243-249. 10.1007/BF02254673Denche M, Marhoune AL: High order mixed-type differential equations with weighted integral boundary conditions.

*Electronic Journal of Differential Equations*2000, 2000(60):-10.Kiguradze I: Boundary value problems for systems of ordinary differential equations.

*Journal of Soviet Mathematics*1988, 43(2):2259-2339. 10.1007/BF01100360Krall AM: The adjoint of a differential operator with integral boundary conditions.

*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1965, 16: 738-742. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1965-0181794-9Ma R: A survey on nonlocal boundary value problems.

*Applied Mathematics E-Notes*2007, 7: 257-279.Granas A, Dugundji J:

*Fixed Point Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics*. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2003:xvi+690.

## Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the referees for their remarks.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Benchohra, M., Nieto, J. & Ouahab, A. Second-Order Boundary Value Problem with Integral Boundary Conditions.
*Bound Value Probl* **2011**, 260309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/260309

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/260309