- Review Article
- Open Access
An Overview of the Lower and Upper Solutions Method with Nonlinear Boundary Value Conditions
© Alberto Cabada. 2011
- Received: 19 April 2010
- Accepted: 7 July 2010
- Published: 25 July 2010
The aim of this paper is to point out recent and classical results related with the existence of solutions of second-order problems coupled with nonlinear boundary value conditions.
- Dirichlet Problem
- Nonlinear Boundary
- Lower Solution
- Extremal Solution
- Nonlinear Part
The first steps in the theory of lower and upper solutions have been given by Picard in 1890  for Partial Differential Equations and, three years after, in  for Ordinary Differential Equations. In both cases, the existence of a solution is guaranteed from a monotone iterative technique. Existence of solutions for Cauchy equations have been proved by Perron in 1915 . In 1927, Müller extended Perron's results to initial value systems in .
In consequence, this method allows us to ensure the existence of a solution of the considered problem lying between the lower and the upper solution, that is, we have information about the existence and location of the solutions. So the problem of finding a solution of the considered problem is replaced by that of finding two well-ordered functions that satisfy some suitable inequalities.
Following these pioneering results, there have been a large number of works in which the method has been developed for different kinds of boundary value problems, thus first-, second- and higher-order ordinary differential equations with different type of boundary conditions such as, among others, periodic, mixed, Dirichlet, or Neumann conditions, have been considered. Also partial differential equations of first and second-order, have been treated in the literature.
In the classical books of Bernfeld and Lakshmikantham  and Ladde et al.  the classical theory of the method of lower and upper solutions and the monotone iterative technique are given. This gives the solution as the limit of a monotone sequence formed by functions that solve linear problems related to the nonlinear equations considered. We refer the reader to the classical works of Mawhin [8–11] and the surveys in this field of De Coster and Habets [12–14] in which one can found historical and bibliographical references together with recent results and open problems.
It is important to point out that to derive the existence of a solution a growth condition on the nonlinear part of the equation with respect to the dependence on the first derivative is imposed. The most usual condition is the so-called Nagumo condition that was introduced for this author  in 1937. This condition imposes, roughly speaking, a quadratic growth in the dependence of the derivative. The most common form of presenting it is the following.
The usual tool to derive an existence result consists in the construction of a modified problem that satisfies the two following properties.
()The nonlinear part of the modified equation is bounded.
In the proof it is deduced that all the solutions of the truncated problem (1.14) belong to the segment and on . Notice that the constant only depends on , and . The existence of solutions is deduced from fixed point theory.
It is important to point out that the a priori bound is deduced for all solutions of the truncated problem. The boundary data is not used. This property is fundamental when more general situations are considered.
In 1954, Nagumo  constructed an example in which the existence of well-ordered lower and upper solutions is not sufficient to ensure the existence of solutions of a Dirichlet problem, that is, in general this growth condition cannot be removed for the Dirichlet case. An analogous result concerning the optimality of the Nagumo condition for periodic and Sturm-Liouville conditions has been showed recently by Habets and Pouso in .
In 1967, Kiguradze  proved that it is enough to consider a one-sided Nagumo condition (by eliminating the absolute value in (1.11)) to deduce existence results for Dirichlet problems. Similar results have been given in 1968 by Schrader .
coupled with the corresponding boundary value conditions.
This truncation has been introduced by Gao and Wang in  for the periodic problem and improves a previous one given by Wang et al. in . Notice that the function is bounded in and it is measurable because of the following result proved in [28, Lemma ].
is assumed on function for some and all , it is possible to deduce the existence of extremal solutions in the sector of the considered problem. By extremal solutions we mean the greatest and the smallest solutions in the set of all the solutions in . The deduction of such a property holds from an iterative technique that consists of solving related linear problems on and using suitable maximum principles which are equivalent to the constant sign of the associated Green's function. One can find in  a complete development of this theory for different kinds of boundary value conditions.
Cherpion et al. prove in  the existence of extremal solutions for the Dirichlet problem without assuming the condition (1.20). In fact, they consider a more general problem: the -laplacian equation. In this case, they define a concept of lower and upper solutions in which some kind of angles are allowed. The definitions are the following.
By means of a sophisticated argument, the authors construct a sequence of upper solutions that converges uniformly to the function defined at each point as the minimum value attained by all the solutions of problem (1.1) in at this point. Passing to the limit, they conclude that such function is a solution too. The construction of these upper solutions is valid only in the case that corners are allowed in the definition. The same idea is valid to get a maximal solution.
It is obvious that when nonlinear boundary value conditions are treated, the operator whose fixed points are the solutions of the considered problem must be modified.
Moreover the truncations that have to be made in the nonlinear part of the problem (1.14), for the continuous case, and in (1.19), for the Carathéodory one, must be extended to the nonlinear boundary conditions. This new truncation on the boundary conditions must satisfy similar properties to the ones of the nonlinear part of the equation, that is,
()the modified nonlinear boundary value conditions must be bounded,
So, to deduce existence results for this new situation, it is necessary to make use of the qualitative properties of continuity and monotonicity of the functions that define the nonlinear boundary value conditions.
Perhaps the first work that considers nonlinear boundary value conditions coupled with lower and upper solutions is due to Bebernes and Fraker  in 1971. In this work, the equation coupled with the boundary conditions and is considered. Here, is compact and connected and is closed and connected. Under some additional conditions on the two sets, that include as a particular case ; , the existence result is deduced under the assumption that a pair of well-ordered lower and upper solutions exist and a Nagumo condition is satisfied.
Later Bernfeld and Lakshmikantham  studied the boundary conditions ; with and monotone nonincreasing in the second variable.
Here functions and satisfy suitable monotonicity conditions. Such monotonicity properties include, as particular cases, the periodic problem in the first situation and the separated conditions in the second and third cases.
The proofs follow from the study of the Dirichlet problem (1.1) with and . From the monotonicity assumptions it is proved, by a similar argument to the shooting method, that there is at least a pair , for which the boundary conditions hold.
where is a continuously parametrized curve in and is a continuous function. The proof is based on reducing the problem to another one with divided boundary conditions and applying the Bol'-Brauer theorem.
The first case covers the periodic case and the second one separated boundary conditions.
In the proofs, a more general definition of lower and upper solutions is used. In particular, they replace the definitions (1.2) and (1.4) by the following ones.
The proofs follow from oscillation theory and boundedness of the boundary conditions.
Franco and O'Regan, by avoiding some monotonicity assumptions on the boundary data, introduce in  a new definition of coupled lower and upper solutions for the boundary value conditions (2.9). In this case, the definition of such functions concerns both of the functions together. Under this definition they cover, under the same notation, periodic, antiperiodic, and Dirichlet boundary value conditions. Moreover they introduce a new concept of Nagumo condition as follows.
As far as the author is aware, the first reference in which this problem has been studied in combination with the method of lower and upper solutions is due to De Coster in , who considers (3.1) (without dependence on ) coupled with Dirichlet conditions. Moreover, she treat, a more general operator that includes, as a particular case, the -laplacian operator. To be concise, operator conserves the two main qualitative properties of operator :
Of course, some additional assumptions are needed depending on the considered boundary conditions, that is, we assume (1.3) and (1.5) for the Dirichlet case, (1.7) and (1.8) for the Neumann case, or (1.10) for the periodic case.
In the previous mentioned papers, the existence of solutions lying between a pair of well-ordered lower and upper solutions was shown. In , the existence of extremal solutions for the Dirichlet problem is proved. As we have noted earlier, in that paper, a new definition of lower and upper solutions with corners is used that allows one to construct a sequence of upper solutions over the function minimum of the solutions in .
Two point nonlinear boundary value conditions have been treated in . In this case and have been studied. The monotonicity assumptions on and cover the periodic conditions. The proof follows from a truncated problem on as in the nonlinear part of (1.19) and a truncated boundary conditions as in (2.11).
and the existence of extremal solutions lying between a pair of well-ordered lower and upper solutions is obtained. The results follows from an appropriate truncated problem and the extension to this case of the arguments used in  to get the extremal solutions.
In this last section, we mention some kind of problems that model different real phenomena that, as we will see, can be presented under the same formulation.
coupled with the nonlinear functional boundary conditions (3.13).
covering in this case the Sturm-Liouville and the multipoint boundary conditions as particular cases.
It is important to note that in some of the previous results some kind of discontinuities on the spatial variable are assumed. In this case, some techniques developed by Heikkilä and Lakshmikantham in  are used.
There is large bibliography on papers related with lower and upper solutions with nonlinear boundary value conditions for first- and higher-order equations.
Problems with impulses, difference equations, and partial differential equations have been studied under this point of view for an important number of researchers.
Some theories as the Thompson's notion of compatibility  or the Frigon's tube-solutions  give some generalizations of the concept of lower and upper solutions that ensure the existence of solutions of nonlinear boundary problems under weaker assumptions.
The author is grateful for professors Jean Mawhin and Felix Ž. Sadyrbaev, their interesting comments have been of great importance in the development of this work. He is also grateful for the anonymous referees whose useful remarks have made the paper more readable. This paper was partially supported by Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain, Project MTM2007-61724.
- Picard E: Mémoire sur la théorie des équations aux derivés partielles et las méthode des approximations succesives. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 1890, 6: 145–210.Google Scholar
- Picard E: Sur l'application des métodes d'approximations succesives à l'étude de certains équations différentielles ordinaires. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 1893, 9: 217–271.Google Scholar
- Perron O: Ein neuer existenzbeweis für die integrale der differentialgleichung . Mathematische Annalen 1915, 76(4):471–484. 10.1007/BF01458218View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Müller M: Über das fundamentaltheorem in der theorie der gewöhnlichen differentialgleichungen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 1927, 26(1):619–645. 10.1007/BF01475477View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Dragoni GS: II problema dei valori ai limiti studiato in grande per le equazioni differenziali del secondo ordine. Mathematische Annalen 1931, 105(1):133–143. 10.1007/BF01455811View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bernfeld SR, Lakshmikantham V: An Introduction to Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 10. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1974:xi+386.Google Scholar
- Ladde GS, Lakshmikantham V, Vatsala AS: Monotone Iterative Techniques for Nonlinear Differential Equations. Pitman, Boston, Mass, USA; 1985.Google Scholar
- Mawhin J: Bounded solutions of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. In Non-Linear Analysis and Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations (Udine), CISM Courses and Lectures. Volume 371. Springer, Vienna, Austria; 1996:121–147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mawhin J: Boundary value problems for nonlinear ordinary differential equations: from successive approximations to topology. In Development of Mathematics 1900–1950 (Luxembourg, 1992). Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland; 1994:443–477.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mawhin J: Twenty years of ordinary differential equations through twelve Oberwolfach meetings. Results in Mathematics 1992, 21(1–2):165–189.View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Mawhin J: Points fixes, points critiques et problèmes aux limites, Séminaire de Mathématiques Supérieures. Volume 92. Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; 1985:162.Google Scholar
- De Coster C, Habets P: Two-Point Boundary Value Problems: Lower and Upper Solutions, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 205. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2006:xii+489.Google Scholar
- De Coster C, Habets P: The lower and upper solutions method for boundary value problems. In Handbook of Differential Equations. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2004:69–160.Google Scholar
- De Coster C, Habets P: An overview of the method of lower and upper solutions for ODEs. In Nonlinear Analysis and Its Applications to Differential Equations, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl.. Volume 43. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001:3–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagumo M: Uber die differentialgleichung . Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan 1937, 19: 861–866.Google Scholar
- Nagumo M: On principally linear elliptic differential equations of the second order. Osaka Journal of Mathematics 1954, 6: 207–229.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Habets P, Pouso RL: Examples of the nonexistence of a solution in the presence of upper and lower solutions. The ANZIAM Journal 2003, 44(4):591–594. 10.1017/S1446181100012955View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kiguradze IT: A priori estimates for the derivatives of bounded functions satisfying second-order differential inequalities. Differentsial'nye Uravneniya 1967, 3: 1043–1052.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Schrader KW: Solutions of second order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Differential Equations 1968, 4: 510–518. 10.1016/0022-0396(68)90002-8View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Tonelli L: Sull'equazione differenziale . Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 1939, 8(1):75–88.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Epheser H: Über die Existenz der Lösungen von Randwertaufgaben mit gewöhnlichen, nichtlinearen Differentialgleichungen zweiter Ordnung. Mathematische Zeitschrift 1955, 61: 435–454.View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Krasnoselskii M: On some boundary value problems. Izvestiya Academy of Sciences USSR 1956, 20: 241–252.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kiguradze IT: Some Singular Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations. Izdat. Tbilis. Univ., Tbilisi, Russia; 1975.Google Scholar
- Kiguradze IT: Some singular boundary value problems for second order nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Differentsial'nye Uravneniya 1968, 4: 1753–1773.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Mawhin J: The Bernstein-Nagumo problem and two-point boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations. In Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, Vol. I, II (Szeged, 1979), Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai. Volume 30. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1981:709–740.Google Scholar
- Fabry C, Habets P: Upper and lower solutions for second-order boundary value problems with nonlinear boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1986, 10(10):985–1007. 10.1016/0362-546X(86)90084-2View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Gao WJ, Wang JY: On a nonlinear second order periodic boundary value problem with Carathéodory functions. Annales Polonici Mathematici 1995, 62(3):283–291.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wang MX, Cabada A, Nieto JJ: Monotone method for nonlinear second order periodic boundary value problems with Carathéodory functions. Annales Polonici Mathematici 1993, 58(3):221–235.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Scorza Dragoni S: Elementi uniti di transformazioni funzionali e problemi di valori ai limiti Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Roma 1938, 2(4):255–275.Google Scholar
- Ponomarev VD: The existence of the solution of the simplest boundary value problem for a second-order differential equation. Latviĭskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Ezhegodnik 1978, (22):69–74.Google Scholar
- Lepin AYa: Existence of solutions of boundary value problems for a second-order equation. Differential Equations 1990, 26(10):1279–1286.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lepin LA: On the concepts of lower and upper functions. Differential Equations 1980, 16(10):1750–1759.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lepin LA: Generalized lower and upper functions and their properties. Latviĭskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Ezhegodnik 1980, (24):113–123.Google Scholar
- Lepin LA: Generalized solutions and the solvability of boundary value problems for a second-order differential equation. Differential Equations 1982, 18(8):1323–1330.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lepin AYa, Lepin LA, Ponomarev VD: Generalized solvability of nonlinear boundary value problems. Differential Equations 1986, 22(2):198–203.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lepin AJa, Sadyrbaev FZh: The upper and lower functions method for second order systems. Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen 2001, 20(3):739–753.View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cherpion M, De Coster C, Habets P: Monotone iterative methods for boundary value problems. Differential and Integral Equations 1999, 12(3):309–338.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cid JÁ: On extremal fixed points in Schauder's theorem with applications to differential equations. Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society. Simon Stevin 2004, 11(1):15–20.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kelley JL: General Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 27. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1975:xiv+298.Google Scholar
- Bebernes JW, Fraker R: A priori bounds for boundary sets. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1971, 29: 313–318. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1971-0277807-9View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Erbe LH: Existence of solutions to boundary value problems for second order differential equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1982, 6(11):1155–1162. 10.1016/0362-546X(82)90027-XView ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Virzhbitskiĭ YaV, Sadyrbaev FZh: A two-point boundary value problem for a second-order ordinary differential equation. Latviĭskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Ezhegodnik 1986, (30):39–42.Google Scholar
- Rachůnková I: Upper and lower solutions and multiplicity results. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2000, 246(2):446–464. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.6798View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Sadyrbaev FZh: Level surfaces of Lyapunov functions and solvability of a two-point boundary value problem. Latviĭskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Ezhegodnik 1980, (24):172–177.Google Scholar
- Sadyrbaev FŽ: A two-point boundary value problem for a system of first-order ordinary differential equations. Latviĭskiĭ Matematicheskiĭ Ezhegodnik 1979, (23):131–136.Google Scholar
- Assohoun A: Sur et sous-solutions généralisées et problèmes aux limites du second ordre. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de Belgique. Série B 1990, 42(3):347–368.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Franco D, O'Regan D: Existence of solutions to second order problems with nonlinear boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A 2003, (supplement):273–280.Google Scholar
- Esteban JR, Vázquez JL: On the equation of turbulent filtration in one-dimensional porous media. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1986, 10(11):1303–1325. 10.1016/0362-546X(86)90068-4View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Herrero MA, Vázquez JL: On the propagation properties of a nonlinear degenerate parabolic equation. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 1982, 7(12):1381–1402. 10.1080/03605308208820255View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- De Coster C: Pairs of positive solutions for the one-dimensional -Laplacian. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1994, 23(5):669–681. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)90245-3View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Gao W: Existence of solutions to boundary value problems for a nonlinear second order equation with weak Carathéodory functions. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems 1997, 5(2):175–185.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cabada A, Pouso RL: Existence result for the problem with periodic and Neumann boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1997, 30(3):1733–1742. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00249-6View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cabada A, Pouso RL: Existence results for the problem with nonlinear boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1999, 35(2):221–231. 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00009-1View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lepin AJa, Lepin LA, Sadyrbaev FZh: Two-point boundary value problems with monotonically boundary conditions for one-dimensional φ -Laplacian equations. Functional Differential Equations 2005, 12(3–4):347–363.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cabada A, Pouso RL: Extremal solutions of strongly nonlinear discontinuous second-order equations with nonlinear functional boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2000, 42(8):1377–1396. 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00158-3View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cabada A, Pouso RL: Existence theory for functional -Laplacian equations with variable exponents. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2003, 52(2):557–572. 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00122-0View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cabada A, O'Regan D, Pouso RL: Second order problems with functional conditions including Sturm-Liouville and multipoint conditions. Mathematische Nachrichten 2008, 281(9):1254–1263. 10.1002/mana.200510675View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Heikkilä S, Lakshmikantham V: Monotone Iterative Techniques for Discontinuous Nonlinear Differential Equations, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Volume 181. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA; 1994:xii+514.Google Scholar
- Thompson HB, Tisdell CC: Nonlinear multipoint boundary value problems for weakly coupled systems. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1999, 60(1):45–54. 10.1017/S0004972700033311View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Frigon M, Montoki E: Systems of differential inclusions with maximal monotone terms. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 323(2):1134–1151. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.11.023View ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.