Monotone and convex positive solutions for fourth-order multi-point boundary value problems

Yang Liu; Zhang Weiguo; Shen Chunfang

doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2011-21

Research
Open Access
Published: 05 September 2011

Monotone and convex positive solutions for fourth-order multi-point boundary value problems

Yang Liu^1,2,
Zhang Weiguo¹ &
Shen Chunfang²

Boundary Value Problems volume 2011, Article number: 21 (2011) Cite this article

1978 Accesses
1 Citations
Metrics details

Abstract

The existence results of multiple monotone and convex positive solutions for some fourth-order multi-point boundary value problems are established. The nonlinearities in the problems studied depend on all order derivatives. The analysis relies on a fixed point theorem in a cone. The explicit expressions and properties of associated Green's functions are also given.

MSC: 34B10; 34B15.

1 Introduction

Boundary value problems for second and higher order nonlinear differential equations play a very important role in both theory and applications. For example, the deformations of an elastic beam in the equilibrium state can be described as a boundary value problem of some fourth-order differential equations. Owing to its importance in application, the existence of positive solutions for nonlinear second and higher order boundary value problems has been studied by many authors. We refer to recent contributions of Ma [1–3], He and Ge [4], Guo and Ge [5], Avery et al. [6, 7], Henderson [8], Eloe and Henderson [9], Yang et al. [10], Webb and Infante [11, 12], and Agarwal and O'Regan [13]. For survey of known results and additional references, we refer the reader to the monographs by Agarwal [14] and Agarwal et al. [15].

When it comes to positive solutions for nonlinear fourth-order ordinary differential equations, two point boundary value problems are studied extensively, see [16–24]. Few papers deal with the multi-point cases. Furthermore, for nonlinear fourth-order equations, only the situation that the nonlinear term does not depend on the first, second and third order derivatives are considered, see [16–23]. Few paper deals with the situation that lower order derivatives are involved in the nonlinear term explicitly. In fact, the derivatives are of great importance in the problem in some cases. For example, in the linear elastic beam equation (Euler-Bernoulli equation)

(EI u ″ (t)) ″ = f (t), t ∈ (0, L),

where u(t) is the deformation function, L is the length of the beam, f(t) is the load density, E is the Young's modulus of elasticity and I is the moment of inertia of the cross-section of the beam. In this problem, the physical meaning of the derivatives of the function u(t) is as follows: u⁽⁴⁾(t) is the load density stiffness, u'''(t) is the shear force stiffness, u''(t) is the bending moment stiffness and the u'(t) is the slope. If the payload depends on the shear force stiffness, bending moment stiffness or the slope, the derivatives of the unknown function are involved in the nonlinear term explicitly.

In this paper, we are interested in the positive solution for fourth-order nonlinear differential equation

x (4) (t) = f (t, x (t), x ′ (t), x ″ (t), x ‴ (t)), t ∈ [0, 1],

(1.1)

subject to multi-point boundary condition

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (0) = 0, x (1) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i)

(1.2)

or

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (1) = 0, x (0) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i)

(1.3)

where 0 < ξ₁ < ξ₂ < ⋯ < ξ_m-2< 1, β_i > 0, 1 = 1, 2, ..., m - 2, $∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i > 1$ , and f ∈ C([0, 1] × R⁴, [0, +∞)).

One can see that all lower order derivatives are involved in the nonlinear term explicitly and the BCs are the m-point cases. In this sense, the problems studied in this paper are more general than before. In the paper, multiple monotone and convex positive solutions for problems (1.1), (1.2) and (1.1), (1.3) are established. The results presented extend the study for fourth-order boundary value problems of nonlinear ordinary differential equations.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some preliminaries and lemmas. Section 3 is devoted to the existence of at least three convex and increasing positive solutions for problem (1.1), (1.2). In Section 4, we prove that there exist at least three convex and decreasing positive solutions for problem (1.1), (1.3).

2 Preliminaries and lemmas

In this section, some preliminaries and lemmas used later are presented.

Definition 2.1 The map α is said to be a nonnegative continuous convex functional on cone P of a real Banach space E provided that α : P → [0, +∞) is continuous and

α (t x + (1 - t) y) ≤ t α (x) + (1 - t) α (y) for all x, y ∈ P and t ∈ [0, 1] .

Definition 2.2 The map β is said to be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on cone P of a real Banach space E provided that β : P → [0, +∞) is continuous and

β (t x + (1 - t) y) ≥ t β (x) + (1 - t) β (y), for all x, y ∈ P and t ∈ [0, 1] .

Let γ, θ be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on P, α be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P and ψ be a nonnegative continuous functional on P. Then for positive numbers a, b, c and d, we define the following convex sets:

P (γ, d) = {x ∈ P | γ (x) < d}, P (γ, α, b, d) = {x ∈ P | b ≤ α (x), γ (x) ≤ d}, P (γ, θ, α, b, c, d) = {x ∈ P | b ≤ α (x), θ (x) ≤ c, γ (x) ≤ d}

and a closed set

R (γ, ψ, a, d) = {x ∈ P | a ≤ ψ (x), γ (x) ≤ d} .

Lemma 2.1 [25] Let P be a cone in Banach space E. Let γ, θ be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on P, α be a nonnegative continuous concave functional and ψ be a nonnegative continuous functional on P satisfying

ψ (λ x) ≤ λ ψ (x), f o r 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1,

such that for some positive numbers l and d,

α (x) ≤ ψ (x), ∥ x ∥ ≤ l γ (x)

for all $x ∈ P (γ, d) ¯$ . Suppose $T : P (γ, d) ¯ → P (γ, d) ¯$ is completely continuous and there exist positive numbers a, b, c with a < b such that

(S₁) {x ∈ P (γ, θ, α, b, c, d)|α(x) > b} ≠ ∅ and α(Tx) > b for x ∈ P (γ, θ, α, b, c, d);

(S₂) α(Tx) > b for x ∈ P (γ, α, b, d) with θ(Tx) > c;

(S₃) 0 ∉ R(γ, ψ, a, d) and ψ(Tx) < a for x ∈ R(γ, ψ, a, d) with ψ(x) = a.

Then T has at least three fixed points x₁, x₂, $x 3 ∈ P (γ, d) ¯$ such that:

γ (x i) ≤ d, i = 1, 2, 3; b < α (x 1); a < ψ (x 2), α (x 2) < b; ψ (x 3) < a .

3 Positive solutions for problem (1.1), (1.2)

We begin with the fourth-order m-point boundary value problem

x (4) (t) = y (t), t ∈ [0, 1],

(3.1)

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (0) = 0, x (1) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i),

(3.2)

where 0 < ξ₁ < ξ₂ < ⋯ < ξ_m-2< 1, β_i > 0, i = 1, 2, ..., m - 2.

The following assumption will stand throughout this section:

(H 1) f ∈ C ([0, 1] × R 4, [0, + ∞)), ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i > 1, ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i < 1 .

Lemma 3.1 Denote ξ₀ = 0, ξ_{m -1}= 1, β₀ = β_{m -1}= 0, and y(t) ∈ C[0, 1]. Problem (3.1), (3.2) has the unique solution

x (t) = ∫ 01 G (t, s) y (s) d s,

where

G (t, s) = - 16 t 3 + 12 s t 2 + 16 s 3 + ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s - 16 s 3 + 12 1 - ∑ k = i m - 2 β k ξ k s 2 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1, t ≤ s, 12 s 2 t + ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s - 16 s 3 + 12 1 - ∑ k = i m - 2 β k ξ k s 2 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1, t ≥ s,

for ξ_i-1≤ s ≤ ξ_i, i = 1, 2, ..., m -1.

Proof Let G(t, s) be the Green's function of problem x⁽⁴⁾(t) = 0 with boundary condition (3.2). We can suppose

G (t, s) = a 3 t 3 + a 2 t 2 + a 1 t + a 0, t ≤ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, i = 1, 2, …, m - 1, b 3 t 3 + b 2 t 2 + b 1 t + b 0, t ≥ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, i = 1, 2, …, m - 1 .

Considering the definition and properties of Green's function together with the boundary condition (3.2), we have

a 3 s 3 + a 2 s 2 + a 1 s + a 0 = b 3 s 3 + b 2 s 2 + b 1 s + b 0, 3 a 3 s 2 + 2 a 2 s + a 1 = 3 b 3 s 2 + 2 b 2 s + b 1, 6 a 3 s + 2 a 2 = 6 b 3 s + 2 b 2, 6 a 3 - 6 b 3 = - 1, 6 b 3 = 0, 6 b 3 + 2 b 2 = 0, a 1 = 0, b 3 + b 2 + b 1 + b 0 = ∑ k = 0 i = 1 β k (a 3 ξ k 3 + a 2 ξ k 2 + a 1 ξ k + a 0) + ∑ k = i m - 2 β k (b 3 ξ k 3 + b 2 ξ k 2 + b 1 ξ k + b 0) .

A straightforward calculation shows that

a 3 = - 16, a 2 = s 2, a 1 = 0, a 0 = ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s - 16 s 3 + 12 1 - ∑ k = i m - 2 β k ξ k s 2 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1 + 16 s 3, b 3 = b 2 = 0, b 1 = s 2 2, b 0 = ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s - 16 s 3 + 12 1 - ∑ k = i m - 2 β k ξ k s 2 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1

These give the explicit expression of the Green's function and the proof of Lemma 3.1 is completed.

Lemma 3.2 One can see that G(t, s) ≥ 0, t, s ∈ [0, 1].

Proof For ξ_i-1≤ s ≤ ξ_i, i = 1, 2, ..., m - 1,

∂ G (t, s) ∂ t = 12 t (2 s - t), t ≤ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, 12 s 2, t ≥ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i .

Then $∂ G (t, s) ∂ t ≥ 0$ , 0 ≤ t, s ≤ 1. Thus G(t, s) is increasing on t. By a simple computation, we see

G (0, s) = 16 s 3 + ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s - 16 s 3 + 12 1 - ∑ k = i m - 2 β k ξ k s 2 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1 ≥ 0 .

These ensures that G(t, s) ≥ 0, t, s ∈ [0, 1].

Lemma 3.3 Suppose x(t) ∈ C³[0, 1] and

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (0) = 0, x (1) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i) .

Furthermore x⁽⁴⁾(t) ≥ 0 and there exist t₀ such that x⁽⁴⁾(t₀) > 0. Then x(t) has the following properties:

(1)
$min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≥ δ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |,$
(2)
$max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≤ γ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |,$
(3)
$max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) | max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |,$

where $δ = 1 - ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i ∕ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i), γ = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) ∕ (∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i - 1)$ are positive constants.

Proof Since x⁽⁴⁾(t) ≥ 0, t ∈ [0, 1], then x'''(t) is increasing on [0, 1]. Considering x'''(1) = 0, we have x'''(t) ≤ 0, t ∈ [0, 1]. Thus x''(t) is decreasing on [0, 1]. Considering this together with the boundary condition x''(1) = 0, we conclude that x''(t) ≥ 0. Then x(t) is convex on [0, 1]. Taking into account that x'(0) = 0, we get that

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 x (t) = x (1), min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 x (t) = x (0) .

(1)
From the concavity of x(t), we have
$ξ i (x (1) - x (0)) ≥ x (ξ i) - x (0) .$

Multiplying both sides with β_i and considering the boundary condition, we have

1 - ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i x (1) ≤ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) x (0) .

(3.3)

Thus

min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≥ δ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | .

(2)
Considering the mean-value theorem together with the concavity of x(t), we have
$x (1) - x (ξ i) ≤ (1 - ξ i) x ′ (1) .$
(3.4)

Multiplying both sides with β_i and considering the boundary condition, we have

∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i - 1 x (1) ≤ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) x ′ (1),

(3.5)

which yields that $x (1) ≤ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) ∕ (∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i - 1) | x ′ (1) | = γ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |$ .

(3)
For $x ′ (t) = x ′ (0) + ∫ 0 t x ″ (s) d s$ and x'(0) = 0, we get
$| x ′ (t) | = | ∫ 0 t x ″ (s) d s | ≤ ∫ 01 | x ″ (s) | d s .$

For $x ″ (t) = x ″ (1) - ∫ t 1 x ‴ (s) d s$ and x"(1) = 0, we get

| x ″ (t) | = | ∫ t 1 x ‴ (s) d s | ≤ ∫ 01 | x ‴ (s) | d s .

Consequently

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) | .

These give the proof of Lemma 3.3.

Remark Lemma 3.3 ensures that

max {max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |} ≤ γ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) | .

Let Banach space E = C³[0, 1] be endowed with the norm

∥ x ∥ = max {max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |}, x ∈ E .

Define the cone P ⊂ E by

P = {x ∈ E | x (t) ≥ 0, x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (0) = 0, x (1) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i), x t is convex on [0,1]} .

Let the nonnegative continuous concave functional α, the nonnegative continuous convex functionals γ, θ and the nonnegative continuous functional ψ be defined on the cone by

γ (x) = max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |, θ (x) = ψ (x) = max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |, α (x) = min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | .

By Lemma 3.3, the functionals defined above satisfy

δ θ (x) ≤ α (x) ≤ θ (x) = ψ (x), ∥ x ∥ ≤ γ γ (x) .

(3.6)

Denote

m = ∫ 01 G (0, s) d s, N = ∫ 01 G (1, s) d s, λ = min {m, δ γ} .

Assume that there exist constants 0 < a, b, d with a < b < λd such that

(A 1) f (t, u, v, w, p) ≤ d, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0,1] × [0, γ d] × [0, d] × [0, d] × [− d, 0], (A 2) f (t, u, v, w, p) > b / m, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0, 1] × [b, b / δ] × [0, d] × [0, d] × [− d, 0], (A 3) f (t, u, v, w, p) < a / N, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0, 1] × [0, a] × [0, d] × [0, d] × [− d, 0] .

Theorem 3.1 Under assumptions (A₁)-(A₃), problem (1.1), (1.2) has at least three positive solutions x₁, x₂, x₃ satisfying

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ i (t) | ≤ d, i = 1, 2, 3; b < min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 1 (t) |; a < max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) |, min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) | < b; max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 3 (t) | ≤ a .

Proof Problem (1.1, 1.2) has a solution x = x(t) if and only if x solves the operator equation

x (t) = ∫ 01 G (t, s) f (s, x (s), x ′ (s), x ″ (s), x ‴ (s)) d s = (T x) (t) .

Then

(T x) ‴ (t) = - ∫ t 1 f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s .

For $x ∈ P (γ, d) ¯$ , considering Lemma 3.3 and assumption (A₁), we have f(t, x(t), x'(t), x''(t), x'''(t)) ≤ d. Thus

γ (T x) = | (T x) ‴ (0) | = | - ∫ 01 f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s | = ∫ 01 | f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) | d s ≤ d .

Hence $T : P (γ, d) ¯ → P (γ, d) ¯$ . An application of the Arzela-Ascoli theorem yields that T is a completely continuous operator. The fact that the constant function x(t) = b/δ ∈ P(γ, θ, α, b, c, d) and α(b/δ) > b implies that

{x ∈ P (γ, θ, α, b, c, d) | α (x) > b} ≠ ∅ .

For x ∈ P(γ, θ, α, b, c, d), we have b ≤ x(t) ≤ b/δ and |x'''(t)| < d. From assumption (A₂), we see

f (t, x, x ′, x ′ ′, x ′ ′ ′) > b / m .

Hence, by definition of α and the cone P, we can get

α (T x) = (T x) (0) = ∫ 01 G (0, s) f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s ≥ b m ∫ 01 G (0, s) d s > b m m = b,

which means α(Tx) > b, ∀x ∈ P(γ, θ, α, b, b/δ, d). This ensures that condition (S1) of Lemma 2.1 is fulfilled.

Second, with (3.4) and b < λd, we have

α (T x) ≥ δ θ (T x) > δ × b δ = b

for all x ∈ P(γ, α, b, d) with $θ (T x) > b δ$ .

Thus, condition (S₂) of Lemma 2.1 holds. Finally we show that (S₃) also holds. We see ψ(0) = 0 < a and 0 ∉ R(γ, ψ, a, d). Suppose that x ∈ R(γ, ψ, a, d) with ψ(x) = a, then by the assumption of (A₃),

ψ (T x) = max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | (T x) (t) | = ∫ 01 G (1, s) f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s < a N ∫ 01 G (1, s) d s = a,

which ensures that condition (S₃) of Lemma 2.1 is fulfilled. Thus, an application of Lemma 2.1 implies that the fourth-order m-point boundary value problem (1.1, 1.2) has at least three positive convex increasing solutions x₁, x₂, x₃ with the properties that

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x i ‴ (t) | ≤ d, i = 1, 2, 3; b < min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 1 (t) |; a < max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) |, min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) | < b; max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 3 (t) | ≤ a .

4 Positive solutions for problem (1.1), (1.3)

The following assumption will stand throughout this section:

(H 2), f ∈ C ([0, 1] × R 4, [0, + ∞)), ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i > 1, ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i + 1 - ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i > 0 .

Lemma 4.1 Denote ξ₀ = 0, ξ_m-1= 1, β₀ = β_m-1= 0, the Green's function of problem

x (4) (t) = 0,

(4.1)

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (1) = 0, x (0) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i),

(4.2)

is

H (t, s) = - 16 t 3 + 12 s t 2 - 12 s 2 t + ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s + 12 ξ k s 2 + ∑ k = i m - 2 16 β k s 3 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1, t ≤ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, - 16 s 3 + ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s + 12 ξ k s 2 + ∑ k = i m - 2 16 β k s 3 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1, t ≥ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i,

for i = 1, 2, ..., m - 1.

Proof Suppose that

H (t, s) = a 3 t 3 + a 2 t 2 + a 1 t + a 0 t ≤ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, i = 1, 2, …, m - 1, b 3 t 3 + b 2 t 2 + b 1 t + b 0 t ≥ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, i = 1, 2, …, m - 1 .

Considering the definition and properties of Green's function together with the boundary condition (4.2), we have

a 3 s 3 + a 2 s 2 + a 1 s + a 0 = b 3 s 3 + b 2 s 2 + b 1 s + b 0, 3 a 3 s 2 + 2 a 2 s + a 1 = 3 b 3 s 2 + 2 b 2 s + b 1, 6 a 3 s + 2 a 2 = 6 b 3 s + 2 b 2, 6 a 3 - 6 b 3 = - 1, b 3 = 0, 6 b 3 + 2 b 2 = 0, 3 b 3 + 2 b 2 + b 1 = 0, a 0 = ∑ k = 0 i = 1 β k (a 3 ξ k 3 + a 2 ξ k 2 + a 1 ξ k + a 0) + ∑ k = i m - 2 β k (b 3 ξ k 3 + b 2 ξ k 2 + b 1 ξ k + b 0) .

Consequently

a 3 = - 16, a 2 = 12 s, a 1 = - 12 s 2, b 3 = b 2 = b 1 = 0, a 0 = ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s + 12 ξ k s 2 + ∑ k = i m - 2 16 β k s 3 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1, b 0 = ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s + 12 ξ k s 2 + ∑ k = i m - 2 16 β k s 3 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1 - 16 s 3 .

The proof of Lemma 4.1 is completed.

Lemma 4.2 One can see that H(t, s) ≥ 0, t, s ∈ [0, 1].

Proof For ξ_i-1≤ s ≤ ξ_i, i = 1, 2, ..., m - 1,

∂ H (t, s) ∂ t = - 12 (t - s) 2, t ≤ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i, 0, t ≥ s, ξ i - 1 ≤ s ≤ ξ i .

Then $∂ H (t, s) ∂ t ≤ 0$ , 0 ≤ t, s ≤ 1, which implies that H(t, s) is decreasing on t. The fact that

H (1, s) = ∑ k = 0 i - 1 β k 16 ξ k 3 - 12 ξ k 2 s + 12 ξ k s 2 + ∑ k = i m - 2 16 β k s 3 ∑ k = 0 m - 1 β k - 1 - 16 s 3 ≥ 0

ensures that H(t, s) ≥ 0, t, s ∈ [0, 1].

Lemma 4.3 If x(t) ∈ C³[0, 1],

x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (1) = 0, x (0) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i),

and x⁽⁴⁾(t) ≥ 0, there exists t₀ such that x⁽⁴⁾(t₀) > 0, then

(1)
$min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≥ δ 1 max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |,$
(2)
$max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≤ γ 1 max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |,$
(3)
$max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |$

where $δ 1 = 1 - ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) ∕ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i, γ 1 = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i ∕ ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i - 1$ are positive constants.

Proof It follows from the same methods as Lemma 3.3 that x(t) is convex on [0, 1]. Taking into account that x'(1) = 0, one can see that x(t) is decreasing on [0, 1] and

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 x (t) = x (0), min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 x (t) = x (1) .

(1)
From the concavity of x(t), we have
$ξ i (x (1) - x (0)) ≥ x (ξ i) - x (0) .$

Multiplying both sides with β_i and considering the boundary condition, we have

∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i x (1) ≥ 1 - ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i (1 - ξ i) x (0) .

(4.3)

Thus

min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | ≥ δ 1 max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) | .

(2)
Considering the mean-value theorem, we get
$(0) - x (ξ i) ≤ ξ i | x ′ (0) | .$

From the concavity of x similarly with above we know

∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i - 1 x (0) < ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i ξ i | x ′ (0) | .

(4.4)

Considering (4.3) together with (4.4) we have $x (0) ≤ γ 1 | x ′ (0) | = γ 1 max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |$ .

(3)
For $x ′ (t) = x ′ (1) - ∫ t 1 x ″ (s) d s, x ″ (t) = x ″ (1) - ∫ t 1 x ‴ (s) d s$ and x'(1) = 0, x''(1) = 0, we get
$| x ′ (t) | = | ∫ t 1 x ″ (s) d s | ≤ ∫ 01 | x ″ (s) | d s, | x ″ (t) | = | ∫ t 1 x ‴ (s) d s | ≤ ∫ 01 | x ‴ (s) | d s .$

Thus

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) | ≤ max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) | .

Remark We see that

max {max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |} ≤ γ 1 max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) | .

Let Banach space E = C³[0, 1] be endowed with the norm

∥ x ∥ = max {max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ′ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ″ (t) |, max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x ‴ (t) |}, x ∈ E .

Define the cone P ⊂ E by

P 1 = x ∈ E | x (t) ≥ 0, x ‴ (1) = 0, x ″ (1) = 0, x ′ (1) = 0, x (0) = ∑ i = 1 m - 2 β i x (ξ i), x (t) is convex on [0, 1] .

Denote

m 1 = ∫ 01 H (1, s) d s, N 1 = ∫ 01 H (0, s) d s, λ 1 = min {m 1, δ 1 γ 1} .

Assume that there exist constants 0 < a, b, d with a < b < λ₁d such that

(A 4) f (t, u, v, w, p) ≤ d, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0,1] × [0, γ 1 d] × [− d, 0] × [0, d] × [− d, 0], (A 5) f (t, u, v, w, p) > b / m 1, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0, 1] × [b, b / δ 1] × [− d, 0] × [0, d] × [− d, 0], (A 6) f (t, u, v, w, p) < a / N 1, (t, u, v, w, p) ∈ [0, 1] × [0, a] × [− d, 0] × [0, d] × [− d, 0] .

Theorem 4.1 Under assumptions (A₄)-(A₆), problem (1.1), (1.3) has at least three positive solutions x₁, x₂, x₃ with the properties that

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x i ‴ (t) | ≤ d, i = 1, 2, 3; b < min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 1 (t) |; a < max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) |, min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) | < b; max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 3 (t) | ≤ a .

Proof Problem (1.1), (1.3) has a solution x = x(t) if and only if x solves the operator equation

x (t) = ∫ 01 H (t, s) f (s, x (s), x ′ (s), x ″ (s), x ‴ (s)) d s = (T 1 x) (t) .

Then

(T 1 x) ‴ (t) = - ∫ t 1 f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s .

For $x ∈ P 1 (γ, d) ¯$ , considering Lemma 4.3 and assumption (A₄), we have

f (t, x (t), x ′ (t), x ″ (t), x ‴ (t)) ≤ d .

Thus

γ (T 1 x) = | (T 1 x) ‴ (0) | = | - ∫ 01 f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s | = ∫ 01 | f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) | d s ≤ d .

Hence $T 1 : P 1 (γ, d) ¯ → P 1 (γ, d) ¯$ and T₁ is a completely continuous operator obviously. The fact

that the constant function x(t) = b/δ₁ ∈ P₁(γ, θ, α, b, c, d) and α(b/δ₁) > b implies that

{x ∈ P 1 (γ, θ, α, b, c, d | α (x) > b)} ≠ ∅ .

This ensures that condition (S1) of Lemma 2.1 holds.

For x ∈ P₁(γ, θ, α, b, c, d), we have b ≤ x(t) ≤ b/δ₁ and |x'''(t)| < d. From assumption (A₄),

f (t, x, x ′, x ′ ′, x ′ ′ ′) > b / m 1 .

Hence, by definition of α and the cone P₁, we can get

α (T 1 x) = (T 1 x) (1) = ∫ 01 H (1, s) f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s ≥ b m 1 ∫ 01 H (1, s) d s > b m 1 m 1 = b,

which means α(T₁x) > b, ∀x ∈ P₁(γ, θ, α, b, b/δ, d).

Second, with (4.4) and b < λ₁d, we have

α (T 1 x) ≥ δ 1 θ (T 1 x) > δ 1 × b δ 1 = b

for all x ∈ P₁(γ, α, b, d) with $θ (T 1 x) > b δ 1$ .

Thus, condition (S₂) of Lemma 2.1 holds. Finally we show that (S₃) also holds. We see ψ(0) = 0 < a and 0 ∉ R(γ, ψ, a, d). Suppose that x ∈ R(γ, ψ, a, d) with ψ(x) = a, then by the assumption of (A₆),

ψ (T 1 x) = max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | (T 1 x) (t) | = ∫ 01 H (0, s) f (s, x, x ′, x ″, x ‴) d s < a N 1 ∫ 01 H (0, s) d s = a,

which ensures that condition (S₃) of Lemma 2.1 is satisfied. Thus, an application of Lemma 2.1 implies that the fourth-order m-point boundary value problem (1.1), (1.3) has at least three positive convex decreasing solutions x₁, x₂, x₃ satisfying the conditions that

max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x i ‴ (t) | ≤ d, i = 1, 2, 3; b < min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 1 (t) |; a < max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) |, min 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 2 (t) | < b; max 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 | x 3 (t) | ≤ a .

References

1.
Ma R: Positive solutions of a nonlinear three-point boundary valve problem. Eur J Differ Equ 1999, 34: 1-8.
- Google Scholar
2.
Ma R, Cataneda N: Existence of solution for nonlinear m-point boundary value problem. J Math Anal Appl 2001, 256: 556-567. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7320
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
3.
Ma R, Wang H: Positive solutions of nonlinear three-point boundary value problems. J Math Anal Appl 2003, 279: 1216-1227.
- Article
- Google Scholar
4.
He X, Ge W: Triple solutions for second-order three-point boundary value problems. J Math Anal Appl 2002, 268: 256-265. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7824
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
5.
Guo Y, Ge W: Positive solutions for three-point boundary-value problems with dependence on the first order derivative. J Math Anal Appl 2004, 290: 291-301. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.09.061
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
6.
Avery RI, et al.: Twin solutions of boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations and finite difference equations. Comput Math Appl 2001, 42: 695-704. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00188-2
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
7.
Avery RI, Henderson J: Three symmetric positive solutions for a second order boundary-value problem. Appl Math Lett 2000, 13: 1-7.
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
8.
Henderson J: Double solutions of three-point boundary-value problems for second-order differential equations. Electron J Differ Equ 2004, 115: 1-7.
- Google Scholar
9.
Eloe PW, Henderson J: Positive solutions for (n-1, n) conjugate boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal 1997, 28: 1669-1680. 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00238-Q
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
10.
Yang L, et al.: Multiplicity results for second-order m-point boundary value problem. J Math Anal Appl 2006, 324: 532-542. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.07.084
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
11.
Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems: a unified approach. J Lond Math Soc 2006, 74: 673-693. 10.1112/S0024610706023179
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
12.
Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems involving integral conditions. Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl 2008, 15: 45-67. 10.1007/s00030-007-4067-7
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
13.
Agarwal RP, O'Regan D: A multiplicity result for second order impulsive differential equations via the Leggett Williams fixed point theorem. Appl Math Comput 2005, 161: 433-439. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.096
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
14.
Agarwal RP: Focal Boundary Value Problems for Differential and Difference Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1998.
- Google Scholar
15.
Agarwal RP, O'Regan D, Wong PJY: Positive Solutions of Differential, Difference and Integral Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordercht; 1998.
- Google Scholar
16.
Yao Q: Positive solutions for Eigenvalue problems of fourth-order elastic beam equation. Appl Math Lett 2004, 17: 237-243. 10.1016/S0893-9659(04)90037-7
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
17.
Li Y: On the existence of positive solutions for the bending elastic beam equations. Appl Math Comput 2007, 189: 821-827. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.144
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
18.
Yang Y, Zhang J: Nontrival solutions for some fourth-order boundary value problems with parametes. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 3966-3977. 10.1016/j.na.2008.08.005
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
19.
Yang Y: Triple positive solutions of a class of fourth-order two-point boundary value problems. Appl Math Lett 2010, 23: 366-370. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.10.012
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
20.
Yang X, Lo K: Existence of a positive solution of a fourth-order boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal 2008, 69: 2267-2273. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.006
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
21.
Hang G, Xu Z: Multiple solutions of some fourth-order beam equations. Nonlinear Anal 2008, 68: 3646-3656. 10.1016/j.na.2007.04.007
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
22.
Liu Y: Multiple positive solutions of nonlinear singular boundary value problem for fourth-order equations. Appl Math Lett 2004, 17: 747-757. 10.1016/j.aml.2004.06.001
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
23.
Bai Z, Wang H: On positive solutions of some fourth-order beam equations. J Math Anal Appl 2002, 270: 357-368. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00071-9
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
24.
Kaufmann RR, Kosmatov N: Elastic beam equation with high order derivatives. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 2007, 8: 811-821. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2006.03.006
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar
25.
Avery RI, Peterson AC: Three positive fixed points of nonlinear operators on an ordered Banach space. Comput Math Appl 2001, 208: 313-322.
- Article
- MathSciNet
- Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the anonymous referee for a detailed reading and useful comments and suggestions, which allowed us to improve this work. This work was supported by the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (10040606Q50), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11071164), Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No.10ZR1420800).

Author information

Affiliations

College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, PR China
- Yang Liu
- & Zhang Weiguo
Department of Mathematics, Hefei Normal University, Hefei, Anhui Province, 230061, PR China
- Yang Liu
- & Shen Chunfang

Authors

Yang Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Zhang Weiguo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Shen Chunfang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Liu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The authors declare that the work was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Weiguo, Z. & Chunfang, S. Monotone and convex positive solutions for fourth-order multi-point boundary value problems. Bound Value Probl 2011, 21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2011-21

Download citation

Received: 27 December 2010
Accepted: 05 September 2011
Published: 05 September 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2011-21

Keywords

multi-point boundary value problem
positive solution
cone
fixed point