Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

On the regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluids in terms of one directional derivative

Abstract

In this paper, we establish two new regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluids in terms of one directional derivative of the velocity or of the pressure and the magnetic field.

MSC:35Q35, 76W05, 35B65.

1 Introduction

In this paper, we consider the Cauchy problem of the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar fluid equations

{ t u + u u b b + ( π + | b | 2 ) χ × w = ( μ + χ ) Δ u , t 0 , x R 3 , t w + u w κ div w + 2 χ w χ × u = γ Δ w , t 0 , x R 3 , t b + u b b u = ν Δ b , t 0 , x R 3 , div u = div b = 0 , t 0 , x R 3 , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , w ( x , 0 ) = w 0 ( x ) , b ( x , 0 ) = b 0 ( x ) , x R 3 ,
(1.1)

where u is the fluid velocity, w is the micro-rotational velocity, b is the magnetic field and π is the pressure. Equations (1.1) describe the motion of a micropolar fluid which is moving in the presence of a magnetic field (see [1]). The positive parameters μ, χ, γ, κ and ν in (1.1) are associated with the properties of the materials: μ is the kinematic viscosity, χ is the vortex viscosity, ν and κ are the spin viscosities and 1 ν is the magnetic Reynolds number.

Recently, Yuan [2] investigated the local existence and uniqueness of the strong solutions to the magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1) (see also [36] for the bounded domain cases). Thus, the further problem at the center of the mathematical theory concerning equations (1.1) is whether or not it has a global in time smooth solution for any prescribed smooth initial data, which is still a challenging open problem. In the absence of a global well-posedness theory, the development of regularity criteria is of major importance for both theoretical and practical purposes. We would like to recall some related results in this direction.

Note that if the micro-rotation effects and the magnetic filed are not taken into account, i.e., w=b=0, equations (1.1) reduce to the classical Navier-Stokes equations. The global regularity issue has been thoroughly investigated for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations and many important regularity criteria have been established (see [716] and the references therein). In particular, the first well-known regularity criterion is due to Serrin [14]: if the Leray-Hopf weak solution u of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations satisfies

0 T u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p =1 and 3<p,

then u is regular on (0,T]. Beirao da Veiga [8] and Penel and Pokorny [13] established another regularity criteria by replacing the above conditions with the following ones:

0 T u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p =2 and  3 2 <p,

or

0 T 3 u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 3 2  and 2p.

More recently, Cao and Titi [17] established a regularity criterion in terms of only one of the nine components of the gradient of a velocity field, that is, the solution u is regular on [0,T] if

0 T k u j ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p p + 3 2 p  and 3<p,

where k,j=1,2,3 and kj, or

0 T j u j ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 3 ( p + 2 ) 4 p  and 2<p.

This result on j u j is stronger than a similar result of Zhou and Pokorny [18] in the sense of allowing for much smaller values of p. These regularity criteria are of physical relevance since experimental measurements are usually obtained for quantities of the form k u j . The regularity criterion by imposing the growth conditions on the pressure field are also examined by, for example, Berselli and Galdi [9], Chae and Lee [10] and Zhou [15, 16], i.e., if

0 T π ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p =2 and  3 2 <p,

or

0 T π ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p =3 and 1<p,

then the solution u is regular on [0,T] (see also [14, 17] for the Besov spaces cases). For the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with boundary conditions, Cao and Titi first introduced a regularity criterion in terms of only one component of the pressure gradient based on the breakthrough of the global regularity of the 3D primitive equations [19]. Recently, Cao and Titi [20] established a similar regularity criterion for the Cauchy problem of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, that is, the solution u is regular on [0,T] if

0 T 3 π ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p < 20 7 ,p> 20 16  and q1.

When the micro-rotation effects are neglected, i.e., w=0, equations (1.1) become the usual magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations. Some of the regularity criteria established for the Navier-Stokes equations can be extended to the 3D MHD equations by making assumptions on both u and b (see [21, 22]). Moreover, He and Xin [23, 24] showed that the velocity field u plays a dominant role in the regularity issue and derived a criterion in terms of the velocity field u alone (see also [25, 26] for the Besov spaces cases). Recently, Cao and Wu [27] further proved that if

0 T 3 u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 1 and p3,

or

0 T 3 π ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 7 4  and p 12 7 ,

then (u,b) is regular on [0,T]. More recently, Liu, Zhao and Cui [28] have adapted the method of [27] to establish a similar regularity criterion for the 3D nematic liquid crystal flow.

If we ignore the magnetic filed, i.e., b=0, equations (1.1) reduce to the micropolar fluid equations. The theory of micropolar fluid has attracted more and more scholars’ attention in recent years. In particular, Dong, Jia and Chen [29] recently established a regularity criterion via the pressure field, which says that if

0 T π ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p =3 and 1<p,

then (u,w) is regular on [0,T] (see also [30, 31] for the Lorentz spaces cases).

For the full magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1), Yuan [32] recently showed that the solution (u,w,b) is regular on (0,T] if

0 T u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 1 and 3<p,
(1.2)

or

0 T u ( , t ) L p q dt<with  2 q + 3 p 2 and  3 2 <p.
(1.3)

For other regularity criteria of equations (1.1), we refer to Gala [33], Geng, Chen and Gala [34], Wang, Hu and Wang [35], Yuan [2] and Zhang, Yao and Wang [36].

In this paper, we establish two new regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1) in terms of one directional derivative of the velocity u or of the pressure π and the magnetic field b by adapting the method of [27]. Without loss of generality, we set the viscous coefficients μ+χ=γ=ν=κ=1.

We now state our main results as follows.

Theorem 1.1 Assume that ( u 0 , w 0 , b 0 ) H 3 ( R 3 ) with div u 0 =div b 0 =0. Let (u,w,b) be the corresponding local smooth solution to the magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1) on [0,T) for some T>0. If the velocity u satisfies

0 T 3 u ( , t ) L p q dt:=M(T)<with  2 q + 3 p 1 and p3,
(1.4)

then (u,w,b) can be extended beyond T.

Note that when p=3, q= and thus the corresponding assumption in (1.4) should be understood as esssup 0 t T 3 u ( , t ) L 3 :=M(T)<.

Remark 1.1 Theorem 1.1 improves the regularity criterion in [32] (see (1.3)) in the sense that it depends only on one directional derivative of the velocity u.

Theorem 1.2 Assume that ( u 0 , w 0 , b 0 ) H 1 ( R 3 ) L 4 ( R 3 ) with div u 0 =div b 0 =0. Let (u,w,b) be the corresponding local smooth solution to the magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1) on [0,T) for some T>0. If the pressure π and the magnetic field b satisfy

0 T 3 ( π ( , t ) + | b | 2 ( , t ) ) L p q dt:=M(T)<with  2 q + 3 p 7 4  and  12 7 p4,
(1.5)

then (u,w,b) can be extended beyond T.

Remark 1.2 When b=0, we also obtain a new regularity criterion for the micropolar equations determined by one direction derivative of the pressure π alone.

We shall prove our results in the next section. For simplicity, we denote by p the L p norm and by (,) the L 2 inner product throughout the paper. The letter C denotes an inessential constant which might vary from line to line, but does not depend on particular solutions or functions.

2 Proof of the main results

In this section, we give the proof of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2. The following lemma plays an important role in our arguments. Its proof can be found in [37] or [27].

Lemma 2.1 Let the parameters r 1 , r 2 , r 3 and r satisfy

1 r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ,r<and1+ 3 r = 1 r 1 + 1 r 2 + 1 r 3 ,

and suppose that i φ L r i ( R 3 ) (i=1,2,3). Then there exists a constant C=C( r 1 , r 2 , r 3 )>0 such that

φ r C 1 φ r 1 1 3 2 φ r 2 1 3 3 φ r 3 1 3 .

In particular, when r 1 = r 2 =2 and r 3 =p[1,), there exists a constant C=C(p) such that

φ 3 p C 1 φ 2 1 3 2 φ 2 1 3 3 φ p 1 3

for any φ satisfying 1 φ, 2 φ L 2 ( R 3 ) and 3 φ L p ( R 3 ).

Proof of Theorem 1.1 Observe that for any ( u 0 , w 0 , b 0 ) H 3 ( R 3 ) with div u 0 =div b 0 =0, there exists a unique local smooth solution to equations (1.1) (see [2]). Let T 0 be the maximum existence time. To prove Theorem 1.1, it is sufficient to show that the assumption (1.4) implies T< T 0 . Indeed, we shall prove that under the condition (1.4), there exists a constant C>0 such that

lim sup t T ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) C,
(2.1)

which implies that T is not the maximum existence time and thus the solution (u,w,b) can be extended beyond T by the standard arguments of continuation of local solutions.

Firstly, we derive the energy inequality. For this purpose, we take the L 2 ( R 3 ) inner product of u, w and b with equations (1.1), respectively, sum the resulting equations and then integrate by parts to obtain

1 2 d d t ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + div w ( t ) 2 2 + 2 χ w ( t ) 2 2 = χ ( u , × w ) + χ ( w , × u ) 1 2 ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 ) + C ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 ) ,

where we used divu=divb=0 in the first equality and Hölder’s inequality in the last inequality. Thus,

d d t ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + div w ( t ) 2 2 + χ w ( t ) 2 2 C ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 ) .

It follows from Gronwall’s inequality that

(2.2)

Now we split the proof of the estimates (2.1) into two steps.

Step 1: Estimates for 0 T ( 3 u ( , t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( , t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( , t ) 2 2 )dt.

To this end, differentiating the first three equations in (1.1) with respect to x 3 , taking the L 2 ( R 3 ) inner product of 3 u, 3 w and 3 b with the resulting equations, respectively, and then performing a space integration by parts, we get

1 2 d d t 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 u 2 2 = ( 3 u , 3 u u ) + ( 3 u , 3 b b ) + ( 3 u , b 3 b ) + χ ( 3 u , × 3 w ) , 1 2 d d t 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + div 3 w 2 2 + 2 χ 3 w 2 2 = ( 3 w , 3 u w ) + χ ( 3 w , × 3 u ) , 1 2 d d t 3 b ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 = ( 3 b , 3 u b ) + ( 3 b , 3 b u ) + ( 3 b , b 3 u ) ,

where we used the facts

( 3 u,u 3 u)= ( 3 u , 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) ) =( 3 w,u 3 w)=( 3 b,u 3 b)=0

by divu=0. Noticing that

( 3 u,× 3 w)=( 3 w,× 3 u)and( 3 u,b 3 b)+( 3 b,b 3 u)=0

by divb=0, we can sum the above equations to obtain

1 2 d d t ( 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( 3 u 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) + div 3 w 2 2 + 2 χ 3 w 2 2 = ( 3 u , 3 u u ) + ( 3 u , 3 b b ) ( 3 w , 3 u w ) + 2 χ ( 3 w , × 3 u ) ( 3 b , 3 u b ) + ( 3 b , 3 b u ) : = I 1 + I 2 + I 3 + I 4 + I 5 + I 6 .

We now estimate the above terms one by one. To bound I 1 , we first integrate by parts and then apply Hölder’s inequality to obtain

| I 1 |= | ( u , 3 u 3 u ) | 3 u 2 3 u 6 p 3 p 2 u 3 p .
(2.3)

It follows from the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality that

3 u 6 p 3 p 2 C 3 u 2 1 p 3 u 2 1 1 p

and from Lemma 2.1 that

u 3 p C 1 u 2 1 3 2 u 2 1 3 3 u p 1 3 C u 2 2 3 3 u p 1 3 .

Substituting these two estimates into (2.3) and then using Young’s inequality, we see that for p>3

| I 1 | C 3 u 2 1 + 1 p 3 u 2 1 1 p u 2 2 3 3 u p 1 3 1 4 3 u 2 2 + C 3 u 2 2 u 2 4 p 3 ( p 1 ) 3 u p 2 p 3 ( p 1 ) 1 4 3 u 2 2 + C 3 u 2 2 ( u 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ,
(2.4)

and that for p=3

| I 1 | C 3 u 2 4 3 3 u 2 2 3 u 2 2 3 3 u 3 1 3 1 4 3 u 2 2 + C 3 u 2 2 ( u 2 2 3 u 3 ) .
(2.5)

For I 2 , by Hölder’s inequality, the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality and Young’s inequality, we have for p>3

| I 2 | b 2 3 u p 3 b 2 p p 2 C b 2 3 u p 3 b 2 1 3 p 3 b 2 3 p 1 8 3 b 2 2 + C b 2 2 p 2 p 3 3 u p 2 p 2 p 3 3 b 2 2 p 6 2 p 3 1 8 3 b 2 2 + C ( b 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) 3 b 2 2 p 6 2 p 3 1 8 3 b 2 2 + C ( b 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ( 1 + 3 b 2 2 ) ,
(2.6)

and for p=3

| I 2 | b 2 3 u 3 3 b 6 C b 2 3 u 3 3 b 2 1 8 3 b 2 2 + C b 2 2 3 u 3 2 .
(2.7)

Applying similar procedure to I 3 and I 5 , we have for p<3

| I 3 | 1 2 3 w 2 2 +C ( w 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ( 1 + 3 w 2 2 )
(2.8)

and

| I 5 | 1 8 3 b 2 2 +C ( b 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ( 1 + 3 b 2 2 ) ,
(2.9)

and for p=3

| I 3 | 1 8 3 w 2 2 +C w 2 2 3 u 3 2 ,| I 5 | 1 8 3 b 2 2 +C b 2 2 3 u 3 2 .
(2.10)

For the term I 4 , by using Hölder’s inequality and Young’s inequality, it can be bounded as follows:

| I 4 |=2χ( 3 w,× 3 u) 1 4 3 u 2 2 +C 3 w 2 2 .
(2.11)

Finally, we can follow the steps as in the bound of I 1 to estimate I 6 . Precisely, by integrations by parts and Hölder’s inequality, we have

| I 6 |= | ( 3 b , 3 b u ) | = | ( u , 3 b 3 b ) | 3 b 2 3 b 6 p 3 p 2 u 3 p .

Then the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, Lemma 2.1 and Young’s inequality yield that for p<3

| I 6 | C 3 b 2 1 + 1 p 3 b 2 1 1 p u 2 2 3 3 u p 1 3 1 4 3 b 2 2 + C 3 b 2 2 u 2 4 p 3 ( p 1 ) 3 u p 2 p 3 ( p 1 ) 1 4 3 b 2 2 + C 3 b 2 2 ( u 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ,
(2.12)

and for p=3

| I 6 | C 3 b 2 4 3 3 b 2 2 3 u 2 2 3 3 u 3 1 3 1 4 3 b 2 2 + C 3 b 2 2 ( u 2 2 3 u 3 ) .
(2.13)

Combining the estimates (2.4)-(2.12), we see that for p>3

d d t ( 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( 3 u 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) + div 3 w 2 2 + χ 3 w 2 2 C ( 1 + 3 u 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) ( 1 + u 2 2 + w 2 2 + b 2 2 + 3 u p 2 p p 3 ) ,

and that for p=3

d d t ( 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( 3 u 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) + div 3 w 2 2 + χ 3 w 2 2 C ( 1 + 3 u 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) ( 1 + u 2 2 + w 2 2 + b 2 2 ) ( 1 + 3 u 3 2 ) .

Thus, Gronwall’s inequality together with the energy inequality (2.2) and the assumption (1.4) implies that for p>3

( 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( t ) 2 2 ) ( 1 + 3 u 0 2 2 + 3 w 0 2 2 + 3 b 0 2 2 ) e C 0 t ( 1 + u ( τ ) 2 2 + w ( τ ) 2 2 + b ( τ ) 2 2 + 3 u ( τ ) p 2 p p 3 ) d τ ( 1 + 3 u 0 2 2 + 3 w 0 2 2 + 3 b 0 2 2 ) e C e C t ( 1 + u 0 2 2 + w 0 2 2 + b 0 2 2 ) + C M ( t ) q / q t 1 q / q : = G p ( M ( t ) ) < ( t T )

with q =2p/(p3), and

( 3 u ( t ) 2 2 + 3 w ( t ) 2 2 + 3 b ( t ) 2 2 ) ( 1 + 3 u 0 2 2 + 3 w 0 2 2 + 3 b 0 2 2 ) e C 0 t ( 1 + u ( τ ) 2 2 + w ( τ ) 2 2 + b ( τ ) 2 2 ) ( 1 + 3 u ( τ ) 3 2 ) d τ ( 1 + 3 u 0 2 2 + 3 w 0 2 2 + 3 b 0 2 2 ) e C e C t ( 1 + u 0 2 2 + w 0 2 2 + b 0 2 2 ) ( t + M ( t ) 2 ) : = G 3 ( M ( t ) ) < ( t T ) .

Then

(2.14)

which is the desired estimates.

Step 2: Estimates for ( u ( t ) 2 + w ( t ) 2 + b ( t ) 2 ).

For this purpose, taking the L 2 ( R 3 ) inner product of Δu, Δw and Δb with the first three equations in (1.1), respectively, and then performing a space integration by parts, we have

1 2 d d t u ( t ) 2 2 + Δ u 2 2 = ( Δ u , u u ) ( Δ u , b b ) χ ( Δ u , × w ) , 1 2 d d t w ( t ) 2 2 + Δ w 2 2 + div w 2 2 + 2 χ w 2 2 = ( Δ w , u w ) χ ( Δ w , × u ) , 1 2 d d t b ( t ) 2 2 + Δ b 2 2 = ( Δ b , u b ) ( Δ b , b u ) .

Noticing (Δu,×w)=(Δw,×u), we sum the above equations and integrate by parts to obtain

(2.15)

By using the interpolation inequality and taking p=2 in Lemma 2.1, we have

u 3 3 C ( u 2 1 2 u 6 1 2 ) 3 C ( u 2 1 2 h u 2 1 3 3 u 2 1 6 ) 3 ,

where h =( 1 , 2 ). Then Young’s inequality yields

u 3 3 1 4 h u 2 2 + C u 2 3 3 u 2 1 4 h u 2 2 + C ( u 2 2 + 3 u 2 2 ) u 2 2 .

Similarly,

3 u 3 b 3 2 + u 3 w 3 2 4 u 3 3 + 3 b 3 3 + w 3 3 1 4 ( h u 2 2 + h b 2 2 + h w 2 2 ) + C ( u 2 2 + 3 u 2 2 ) u 2 2 + C ( b 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) b 2 2 + C ( w 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 ) w 2 2 .

Substituting the above two estimates into (2.15), we have

d d t ( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + ( Δ u 2 2 + Δ w 2 2 + Δ b 2 2 ) + div w 2 2 + χ w 2 2 C ( 1 + u 2 2 + 3 u 2 2 + w 2 2 + 3 w 2 2 + b 2 2 + 3 b 2 2 ) × ( u 2 2 + w 2 2 + b 2 2 ) .

By using Gronwall’s inequality, the energy inequality (2.2) and the estimate (2.14), we conclude that

( u ( t ) 2 2 + w ( t ) 2 2 + b ( t ) 2 2 ) + 0 t ( Δ u ( τ ) 2 2 + Δ w ( τ ) 2 2 + Δ b ( τ ) 2 2 + div w ( τ ) 2 2 + χ w ( τ ) 2 2 ) d τ ( u 0 2 2 + w 0 2 2 + b 0 2 2 ) × e C 0 t ( 1 + u ( τ ) 2 2 + 3 u ( τ ) 2 2 + w ( τ ) 2 2 + 3 w ( τ ) 2 2 + b ( τ ) 2 2 + 3 b ( τ ) 2 2 ) d τ C G ˜ ( M ( t ) ) <

for any tT, which implies that the desired estimates (2.1) hold and thus the solution (u,w,b) can be extended beyond T. □

Now we turn our attention to proving Theorem 1.2. We will first transform equations (1.1) into a symmetric form.

Proof of Theorem 1.2 Following from Serrin type criteria (1.2) with p=4 and q= on the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations (1.1), it is sufficient to prove that

lim t T ( u ( t ) 4 + w ( t ) 4 + b ( t ) 4 ) <.
(2.16)

To do this, we set

v + =u+b, v =ub,

and then equations (1.1) are converted to the following symmetric form:

{ t v + + v v + + ( π + | b | 2 ) χ × w = Δ v + , t 0 , x R 3 , t w + 1 2 ( v + + v ) w div w + 2 χ w χ 2 × ( v + + v ) = Δ w , t 0 , x R 3 , t v + v + v + ( π + | b | 2 ) χ × w = Δ v , t 0 , x R 3 , div v + = div v = 0 , t 0 , x R 3 , v + ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) + b 0 ( x ) , w ( x , 0 ) = w 0 ( x ) , v ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) b 0 ( x ) , x R 3 .
(2.17)

Firstly, taking the L 2 ( R 3 ) inner product of v + , w and v with the above equations, respectively, and integrating by parts, we can obtain the energy estimates similar to (2.2).

Next we take the L 2 ( R 3 ) inner product of | v + | 2 v + , | w | 2 w and | v | 2 v with the first three equations in (2.17), respectively, and then integrate by parts to obtain

1 4 d d t ( v + ( t ) 4 4 + w ( t ) 4 4 + v ( t ) 4 4 ) + 1 2 ( | v + | 2 2 2 + | w | 2 2 2 + | v | 2 2 2 ) + ( | v + | v + 2 2 + | w | w 2 2 + | v | v 2 2 ) + 2 χ w 4 4 + | w | div w 2 2 = R 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) ( v + | v + | 2 + v | v | 2 ) d x R 3 ( div w ) ( w | w | 2 ) d x + χ R 3 | v + | 2 v + ( × w ) d x + χ 2 R 3 | w | 2 w ( × ( v + + v ) ) d x + χ R 3 | v | 2 v ( × w ) d x : = I I 1 + I I 2 + I I 3 + I I 4 + I I 5 .

We now bound the above terms one by one. For I I 2 , we have

|I I 2 | | w | w 2 | w | 2 2 1 2 | w | 2 2 2 + 1 2 | w | w 2 2 .

It follows from the integration by parts, we see

| I I 3 | = χ | R 3 w ( × | v + | 2 v + ) d x | C w 4 | v + | v + 2 v + 4 1 2 | v + | v + 2 2 + C w 4 4 + C v + 4 4 .

Similarly, we have

|I I 4 | 1 2 | w | w 2 2 +C w 4 4 +C v + 4 4 +C v 4 4

and

|I I 5 | 1 2 | v | v 2 2 +C w 4 4 +C v 4 4 .

The process for estimating I I 1 is more subtle. It follows from Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 2.1 that

| I I 1 | ( π + | b | 2 ) 4 ( v + 4 | v + | 2 2 + v 4 | v | 2 2 ) 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 1 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) 8 p 7 p 4 2 3 ( v + 4 | v + | 2 2 + v 4 | v | 2 2 ) .

To estimate the term involving (π+ | b | 2 ), we take the divergence of the first equation of (2.17) and find

π+ | b | 2 = ( Δ ) 1 ( v v + )

by div v + =div(×w)=0. Then the Calderón-Zygmund inequality, Hölder’s inequality and the interpolation inequality imply that

( π + | b | 2 ) 8 p 7 p 4 = ( Δ ) 1 ( v v + ) 8 p 7 p 4 v v + 8 p 7 p 4 C v + 2 v 8 p 3 p 4 = C v + 2 | v | 2 4 p 3 p 4 1 2 C v + 2 | v | 2 2 7 p 12 8 p | v | 2 2 12 3 p 8 p .

Similarly, we have

( π + | b | 2 ) 8 p 7 p 4 C v 2 | v + | 2 2 7 p 12 8 p | v + | 2 2 12 3 p 8 p .

If p> 12 7 , combining the above two estimates, we see

| I I 1 | C 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 1 3 v + 2 2 3 v 4 7 p 12 6 p | v | 2 2 4 p 4 p v + 4 | v + | 2 2 + C 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 1 3 v 2 2 3 v + 4 7 p 12 6 p | v + | 2 2 4 p 4 p v 4 | v | 2 2 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + C 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v + 2 16 p 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v 4 4 ( 7 p 12 ) 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v + 4 8 p 5 p 4 + C 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v 2 16 p 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v + 4 4 ( 7 p 12 ) 3 ( 5 p 4 ) v 4 8 p 5 p 4 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + C ( 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 7 p 12 + v + 2 2 ) ( v 4 4 ( 7 p 12 ) 3 ( 3 p 4 ) + v + 4 4 ) + C ( 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 7 p 12 + v 2 2 ) ( v + 4 4 ( 7 p 12 ) 3 ( 3 p 4 ) + v 4 4 ) 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + 1 4 | v + | 2 2 2 + C ( 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 7 p 12 + v + 2 2 + v 2 2 ) ( 1 + v 4 4 + v + 4 4 ) .

The case p= 12 7 can be similarly dealt with.

Summarily, we conclude that

1 4 d d t ( v + ( t ) 4 4 + w ( t ) 4 4 + v ( t ) 4 4 ) C ( 1 + 3 ( π + | b | 2 ) p 8 p 7 p 12 + v + 2 2 + v 2 2 ) ( 1 + v 4 4 + w 4 4 + v + 4 4 ) .

Thus, Gronwall’s inequality together with the assumption (1.5) and the energy estimates gives the desired L 4 estimates (2.12) and thus the solution (u,w,b) can be extended beyond T. □

References

  1. 1.

    Ahmadi G, Shahinpoor M: Universal stability of magneto-micropolar fluid motions. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1974, 12: 657–663. 10.1016/0020-7225(74)90042-1

  2. 2.

    Yuan J: Existence theorem and blow-up criterion of the strong solutions to the magneto-micropolar fluid equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2008, 31: 1113–1130. 10.1002/mma.967

  3. 3.

    Galdi GP, Rionero S: A note on the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the micropolar fluid equations. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1977, 15: 105–108. 10.1016/0020-7225(77)90025-8

  4. 4.

    Ortega-Torres EE, Rojas-Medar MA: Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: global existence of strong solutions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 1999, 4: 109–125. 10.1155/S1085337599000287

  5. 5.

    Rojas-Medar MA: Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: existence and uniqueness of strong solution. Math. Nachr. 1997, 188: 301–319. 10.1002/mana.19971880116

  6. 6.

    Rojas-Medar MA, Boldrini JL: Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: existence of weak solutions. Rev. Mat. Complut. 1998, 11: 443–460.

  7. 7.

    Beale JT, Kato T, Majda A: Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 1984, 94: 61–66. 10.1007/BF01212349

  8. 8.

    Veiga H:A new regularity class for the Navier-Stokes equations in R n . Chin. Ann. Math. 1995, 16: 407–412.

  9. 9.

    Berselli L, Galdi G: Regularity criteria involving the pressure for the weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 130: 3585–3595. 10.1090/S0002-9939-02-06697-2

  10. 10.

    Chae D, Lee J: Regularity criterion in terms of pressure for the Navier-Stokes equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2001, 46: 727–735. 10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00163-2

  11. 11.

    Chen Q, Zhang Z: Regularity criterion via the pressure on weak solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2007, 135: 1829–1837. 10.1090/S0002-9939-06-08663-1

  12. 12.

    Fan J, Jiang S, Ni G: On regularity criteria for the n -dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in terms of the pressure. J. Differ. Equ. 2006, 244: 2963–2979.

  13. 13.

    Penel P, Pokorny M: Some new regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes equations containing gradient of the velocity. Appl. Math. 2004, 49: 483–493.

  14. 14.

    Serrin J: On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1962, 9: 187–195.

  15. 15.

    Zhou Y: Regularity criteria in terms of pressure for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in a generic domain. Math. Ann. 2004, 328: 173–192. 10.1007/s00208-003-0478-x

  16. 16.

    Zhou Y:On a regularity criterion in terms of the gradient of pressure for the Navier-Stokes equations in R N . Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 2006, 57: 384–392. 10.1007/s00033-005-0021-x

  17. 17.

    Cao C, Titi ES: Global regularity criterion for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations involving one entry of the velocity gradient tensor. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2011, 202: 919–932. 10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6

  18. 18.

    Zhou Y, Pokorny M: On the regularity of the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations via one velocity component. Nonlinearity 2010, 23: 1097–1107. 10.1088/0951-7715/23/5/004

  19. 19.

    Cao C, Titi ES: Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations of large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics. Ann. Math. 2007, 166: 245–267. 10.4007/annals.2007.166.245

  20. 20.

    Cao C, Titi ES: Regularity criteria for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 2008, 57: 2643–2661. 10.1512/iumj.2008.57.3719

  21. 21.

    Caflisch R, Klapper I, Steele G: Remarks on singularities, dimension and energy dissipation for ideal hydrodynamics and MHD. Commun. Math. Phys. 1997, 184: 443–455. 10.1007/s002200050067

  22. 22.

    Wu J: Viscous and inviscid magnetohydrodynamics equations. J. Anal. Math. 1997, 73: 251–265. 10.1007/BF02788146

  23. 23.

    He C, Xin Z: On the regularity of weak solutions to the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2005, 213: 235–254. 10.1016/j.jde.2004.07.002

  24. 24.

    He C, Xin Z: Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions to the incompressible magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Funct. Anal. 2005, 227: 113–152. 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.06.009

  25. 25.

    Chen Q, Miao C, Zhang Z: On the regularity criterion of weak solution for the 3D viscous magneto-hydrodynamics equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 2008, 284: 919–930. 10.1007/s00220-008-0545-y

  26. 26.

    Wu J: Regularity criteria for the generalized MHD equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 2008, 33: 285–306. 10.1080/03605300701382530

  27. 27.

    Cao C, Wu J: Two regularity criteria for the 3D MHD equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2010, 248: 2263–2274. 10.1016/j.jde.2009.09.020

  28. 28.

    Liu Q, Zhao J, Cui S: A regularity criterion for the three-dimensional nematic liquid crystal flow in terms of one directional derivative of the velocity. J. Math. Phys. 2011., 52: Article ID 033102

  29. 29.

    Dong B, Jia Y, Chen Z: Pressure regularity criteria of the three-dimensional micropolar fluid flows. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2011, 34: 595–606. 10.1002/mma.1383

  30. 30.

    Dong B, Chen Z: Regularity criteria of weak solutions to the three-dimensional micropolar flows. J. Math. Phys. 2009., 50: Article ID 103525

  31. 31.

    Yuan B: On the regularity criteria of weak solutions to the micropolar fluid equations in Lorentz space. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2010, 138: 2025–2036. 10.1090/S0002-9939-10-10232-9

  32. 32.

    Yuan B: Regularity of weak solutions to magneto-micropolar fluid equations. Acta Math. Sci., Ser. B 2010, 30: 1469–1480.

  33. 33.

    Gala S: Regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in the Morrey-Campanato space. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 2010, 17: 181–194. 10.1007/s00030-009-0047-4

  34. 34.

    Geng J, Chen X, Gala S: On regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 2011, 10: 583–592.

  35. 35.

    Wang Y, Hu L, Wang Y: A Beale-Kato-Madja criterion for magneto-micropolar fluid equations with partial viscosity. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 128614

  36. 36.

    Zhang Z, Yao Z, Wang X: A regularity criterion for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluid equations in Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2011, 74: 2220–2225. 10.1016/j.na.2010.11.026

  37. 37.

    Adams A, Fournier JJF: Sobolev Spaces. 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York; 2003.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments and remarks. This work was partially supported by the NNSF of China (No. 11101068), the Sichuan Youth Science & Technology Foundation (No. 2011JQ0003), the SRF for ROCS, SEM, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZYGX2009X019).

Author information

Correspondence to Zhaoyin Xiang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ZX wrote the first draft and HY corrected and improved it. Both authors read and approved the final draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • magneto-micropolar fluid equations
  • regularity criteria