Infinitely many solutions for class of Neumann quasilinear elliptic systems

Davood Maghsoodi Shoorabi; Ghasem Alizadeh Afrouzi

doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2012-54

Research
Open Access

Infinitely many solutions for class of Neumann quasilinear elliptic systems

Davood Maghsoodi Shoorabi¹Email author and
Ghasem Alizadeh Afrouzi²

Boundary Value Problems20122012:54

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2012-54

Received: 30 January 2012
Accepted: 6 May 2012
Published: 6 May 2012

Abstract

We investigate the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for a class of Neumann quasilinear elliptic systems driven by a (p₁, ..., p_n)-Laplacian operator. The technical approach is fully based on a recent three critical points theorem.

AMS subject classification: 35J65; 34A15.

Keywords

infinitely many solutions
Neumann system
critical point theory
variational methods

1 Introduction

The purpose of this article is to establish the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for the following Neumann quasilinear elliptic system

\{\begin{matrix} - Δ_{p_{i}} u_{i} + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i}|}^{p_{i} - 2} u = λ F_{u_{i}} (x, u_{1}, \dots, u_{n}) & in Ω, \\ \frac{\partial u_{i}}{\partial ν} = 0 & on \partial Ω \end{matrix}

(1)

for i = 1, ..., n, where Ω ⊂ ℝ^N (N ≥ 1) is a non-empty bounded open set with a smooth boundary ∂Ω, p_i > N for i = 1, ..., n, $Δ_{p_{i}} u_{i} = div ({|\nabla u_{i}|}^{p_{i} - 2} \nabla u_{i})$ is the p_i-Laplacian operator, a_i ∈ L^∞ (Ω) with ess inf_Ω a_i > 0 for i = 1, ..., n, λ > 0, and F: Ω × ℝⁿ → ℝ is a function such that the mapping (t₁, t₂,..., t_n) → F (x, t₁, t₂,..., t_n) is in C¹ in ℝⁿ for all $x \in Ω, F_{t_{i}}$ is continuous in Ω × ℝⁿ for i = 1,..., n, and F (x, 0,..., 0) = 0 for all x ∈ Ω and ν is the outward unit normal to ∂Ω. Here, $F_{t_{i}}$ denotes the partial derivative of F with respect to t_i.

Precisely, under appropriate hypotheses on the behavior of the nonlinear term F at infinity, the existence of an interval Λ such that, for each λ ∈ Λ, the system (1) admits a sequence of pairwise distinct weak solutions is proved; (see Theorem 3.1). We use a variational argument due to Ricceri which provides certain alternatives in order to find sequences of distinct critical points of parameter-depending functionals. We emphasize that no symmetry assumption is required on the nonlinear term F (thus, the symmetry version of the Mountain Pass theorem cannot be applied). Instead of such a symmetry, we assume a suitable oscillatory behavior at infinity on the function F.

We recall that a weak solution of the system (1) is any

u = (u_{1}, . . ., u_{n}) \in W^{1, p_{1}} (Ω) \times . . . \times W^{1, p_{n}} (Ω),

such that

\begin{gathered} \int_{Ω} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} ({|\nabla u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i} - 2} \nabla u_{i} (x) \nabla v_{i} (x) + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i} - 2} u_{i} (x) v_{i} (x)) d x \\ - λ \int_{Ω} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} F_{u_{i}} (x, u_{1} (x), . . . u_{n} (x)) v_{i} (x) d x = 0 \end{gathered}

for all $v = (v_{1}, . . ., v_{n}) \in W^{1, p_{1}} (Ω) \times . . . \times W^{1, p_{n}} (Ω) .$

For a discussion about the existence of infinitely many solutions for differential equations, using Ricceri's variational principle [1]and its variants [2, 3] we refer the reader to the articles [4–16].

For other basic definitions and notations we refer the reader to the articles [17–22]. Here, our motivation comes from the recent article [8]. We point out that strategy of the proof of the main result and Example 3.1 are strictly related to the results and example contained in [8].

2 Preliminaries

Our main tool to ensure the existence of infinitely many classical solutions for Dirichlet quasilinear two-point boundary value systems is the celebrated Ricceri's variational principle [[1], Theorem 2.5] that we now recall as follows:

Theorem 2.1. Let X be a reflexive real Banach space, let Φ, Ψ: X → ℝ be two Gâteaux differentiable functionals such that Φ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, strongly continuous, and coercive and Ψ is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous. For every r > inf_X Φ, let us put

φ (r) : = inf_{u \in Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r[)} \frac{{sup}_{v \in Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r[)} Ψ (v) - Ψ (u)}{r - Φ (u)}

and

γ : = \underset{r \to + \infty}{lim inf} φ (r), δ : = \underset{r \to {({inf}_{X} Φ)}^{+}}{lim inf} φ (r) .

Then, one has

(a) for every r > inf_X Φ and every $λ \in]0, \frac{1}{φ (r)}[$ , the restriction of the functional I_λ = Φ - λ Ψ to Φ^-1(] - ∞, r[) admits a global minimum, which is a critical point (local minimum) of I_λ in X.

(b) If γ < +∞ then, for each $λ \in]0, \frac{1}{γ}[$ , the following alternative holds:

either

(b₁) I_λ possesses a global minimum,

or

(b₂) there is a sequence {u_n} of critical points (local minima) of I_λ such that

lim_{n \to + \infty} Φ (u_{n}) = + \infty .

(c) If δ < +∞ then, for each $λ \in]0, \frac{1}{δ}[$ , the following alternative holds:

either

(c₁) there is a global minimum of Φ which is a local minimum of I_λ,

or

(c₂) there is a sequence {u_n} of pairwise distinct critical points (local minima) of I_λ that converges weakly to a global minimum of Φ.

We let X be the Cartesian product of n Sobolev spaces

W^{1, p_{1}} (Ω)

,

W^{1, p_{2}} (Ω)

,... and

W^{1, p_{n}} (Ω)

, i.e.,

X = \prod_{i = 1}^{n} W^{1, p_{i}} (Ω)

, equipped with the norm

∥(u_{1}, u_{2}, \dots, u_{n})∥ = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}},

where

\begin{gathered} {∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}} = {(\int_{Ω} {|\nabla u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i}} + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i}} d x)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}, i = 1, \dots, n . \\ C = max \{sup_{u_{i} \in W^{1, p_{i}} (Ω) \ {0}} \frac{{sup}_{x \in Ω} {|u (x)|}^{p_{i}}}{{∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}}^{p_{i}}}; i = 1, \dots, n\} . \end{gathered}

(2)

Since p_i > N for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, one has C < +∞. In addition, if Ω is convex, it is known [23] that

sup_{u_{i} \in W^{1, p_{i}} (Ω) \ {0}} \frac{{sup}_{x \in Ω} |u_{i} (x)|}{{∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}}} \leq 2^{\frac{p_{i} - 1}{p_{i}}} max \{{(\frac{1}{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1}})}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}; \frac{diam (Ω)}{N^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}} {(\frac{p_{i} - 1}{p_{i} - N} m (Ω))}^{\frac{p_{i} - 1}{p_{i}}} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{\infty}}{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}\}

for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, where ||·||₁ = ∫_Ω|·(x)| dx, ||·||_∞ = sup_x∈Ω|·(x)| and m(Ω) is the Lebesgue measure of the set Ω, and equality occurs when Ω is a ball.

In the sequel, let $\underline{p} = min {p_{i}; 1 \leq i \leq n}$ .

For all γ > 0 we define

K (γ) = \{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ^{n} : \sum_{i = 1}^{n} |t_{i}| \leq γ\} .

(3)

3 Main results

We state our main result as follows:

Theorem 3.1. Assume that

(A1)

\begin{gathered} \underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, . . ., t_{n})}_{\in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} \\ < {(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}} \underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} \end{gathered}

where $K (ξ) = {(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) | \sum_{i = 1}^{n} |t_{i}| \leq ξ}$ (see (3)).

Then, for each

\begin{matrix} λ \in Λ : = \\ ]\frac{1}{lim {sup}_{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{| | a_{i} | |_{1} | t_{i} |}{p_{i}}}}, \frac{{(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{_{i}}}})}^{\underline{p}}}{lim {inf}_{ξ \to + \infty} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, . . ., t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}}}[ \end{matrix}

the system (1) has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions in X.

Proof. Define the functionals Φ, Ψ: X → ℝ for each u = (u₁, ..., u_n) ∈ X, as follows

Φ (u) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}

and

Ψ (u) = \int_{Ω} F (x, u_{1} (x), \dots, u_{n} (x)) d x .

It is well known that Ψ is a Gâteaux differentiable functional and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous whose Gâteaux derivative at the point u ∈ X is the functional Ψ'(u) ∈ X*, given by

Ψ^{'} (u) (v) = \int_{Ω} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} F_{u_{i}} (x, u_{1} (x), \dots, u_{n} (x)) v_{i} (x) d x

for every v = (v₁, ..., v_n) ∈ X, and Ψ': X → X* is a compact operator. Moreover, Φ is a sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous and Gâteaux differentiable functional whose Gâteaux derivative at the point u ∈ X is the functional Φ' (u) ∈ X*, given by

Φ^{'} (u_{1}, \dots, u_{n}) (v_{1}, \dots, v_{n}) \int_{Ω} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} ({|\nabla u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i} - 2} \nabla u_{i} (x) \nabla v_{i} (x) + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i} - 2} u_{i} (x) v_{i} (x)) d x

for every v = (v₁, ..., v_n) ∈ X. Furthermore, (Φ')^-1: X* → X exists and is continuous.

Put I_λ: = Φ - λ Ψ. Clearly, the weak solutions of the system (1) are exactly the solutions of the equation

I_{λ}^{'} (u_{1}, \dots, u_{n}) = 0

. Now, we want to show that

γ < + \infty .

Let {ξ_m} be a real sequence such that ξ_m → +∞ as m → ∞ and

\begin{gathered} lim_{m \to \infty} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ_{m})} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ_{m}^{\underline{p}}} \\ = \underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} . \end{gathered}

Put

r_{m} = \frac{ξ_{m}^{\underline{p}}}{{(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}}}

for all m ∈ ℕ. Since

sup_{x \in Ω} {|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i}} \leq C {∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}}^{p_{i}}

for each

u_{i} \in W^{1, p_{i}} (Ω)

for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, we have

sup_{x \in Ω} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}} \leq C \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥u_{i}∥}_{p_{i}}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}} .

(4)

for each u = (u₁, u₂, ..., u_n) ∈ X. This, for each r > 0, together with (4), ensures that

Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r]) \subseteq \{u \in X; sup \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{|u_{i} (x)|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}} \leq C r for each x \in Ω\} .

Hence, an easy computation shows that

\sum_{i = 1}^{n} |u_{i}| \leq ξ_{m}

whenever u = (u₁, ..., u_n) ∈ Φ^-1(] - ∞, r_m]). Hence, one has

\begin{aligned} φ (r_{m}) & = inf_{u \in Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r_{m}[)} \frac{({sup}_{v \in Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r_{m}[)} Ψ (v)) - Φ (u)}{r_{m} - Φ (u)} \\ \leq \frac{{sup}_{v \in Φ^{- 1} (]- \infty, r_{m}[)} Ψ (v)}{r_{m}} \\ \leq \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ_{m})} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\frac{ξ_{m}^{\underline{p}}}{{(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}}}} . \end{aligned}

Therefore, since from Assumption (A1) one has

\underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} < \infty,

we deduce

\begin{matrix} γ \leq \underset{m \to + \infty}{lim inf} φ (r_{m}) \\ \leq {(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}} \underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} < + \infty . \end{matrix}

(5)

Assumption (A1) along with (5), implies

Λ \subseteq]0, \frac{1}{γ}[.

Fix λ ∈ Λ. The inequality (5) concludes that the condition (b) of Theorem 2.1 can be applied and either I_λ has a global minimum or there exists a sequence {u_m} where u_m = (u_1m, ..., u_nm) of weak solutions of the system (1) such that lim_m→∞||(u_1m, ..., u_nm)|| = +∞.

Now fix λ ∈ Λ and let us verify that the functional I_λ is unbounded from below. Arguing as in [8], consider n positive real sequences ${d_{i, m}}_{i = 1}^{n}$ such that $\sqrt{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} d_{i, m}^{2}} \to + \infty$ as m → ∞

and

lim_{m \to + \infty} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, d_{1, m}, \dots, d_{n, m}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} = \underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} .

(6)

For all m ∈ ℕ define w_m(x) = (d_{1, m}, ..., d_{n, m}). For any fixed m ∈ ℕ, w_m ∈ X and, in particular, one has

Φ (w_{m}) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}} .

Then, for all m ∈ ℕ,

I_{λ} (w_{m}) = Φ (w_{m}) - λ Ψ (w_{m}) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}} - λ \int_{Ω} F (x, d_{1, m}, \dots, d_{n, m}) d x .

Now, if

\underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} | t_{i} |^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} < \infty,

we fix

ε \in]\frac{1}{λ lim {sup}_{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}}}, 1[

. From (6) there exists τ_ε such that

\begin{matrix} \int_{Ω} F (x, d_{1, m}, \dots, d_{n, m}) d x \\ > ε \underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} (\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}}) \forall m > τ_{ε}, \end{matrix}

therefore

I_{λ} (w_{m}) \leq (1 - λ ε \underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}}) \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}} \forall m > τ_{ε},

and by the choice of ε, one has

lim_{m \to + \infty} [Φ (w_{m}) - λ Ψ (w_{m})] = - \infty .

If

\underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim sup} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} = \infty,

let us consider

K > \frac{1}{λ}

. From (6) there exists τ_K such that

\int_{Ω} F (x, d_{1, m}, \dots, d_{n, m}) d x > K \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}} \forall m > τ_{K},

therefore

I_{λ} (w_{m}) \leq (1 - λ K) \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{d_{i, m}^{p_{i}} {∥a_{i}∥}_{1}}{p_{i}} \forall m > τ_{K},

and by the choice of K, one has

lim_{m \to + \infty} [Φ (w_{m}) - λ Ψ (w_{m})] = - \infty .

Hence, our claim is proved. Since all assumptions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied, the functional I_λ admits a sequence {u_m = (u_1m, ..., u_nm)} ⊂ X of critical points such that

lim_{m \to \infty} ∥(u_{1 m}, \dots, u_{n m})∥ = + \infty,

and we have the conclusion. □

Here, we give a consequence of Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.2. Assume that

(A2) ${lim inf}_{ξ \to + \infty} \frac{\int_{Ω} {sup}_{(t_{_{1}}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} < {(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}};$

(A3) ${lim sup}_{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}} \frac{\int_{Ω} F (x, t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) d x}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} > 1 .$

Then, the system

\{\begin{matrix} - Δ_{p_{i}} u_{i} + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i}|}^{p_{i} - 2} u = F_{u_{i}} (x, u_{1}, \dots, u_{n}) & i n Ω, \\ \frac{\partial u_{i}}{\partial ν} = 0 & o n \partial Ω \end{matrix}

for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, has an unbounded sequence of classical solutions in X.

Now, we want to present the analogous version of the main result (Theorem 3.1) in the autonomous case.

Theorem 3.3. Assume that

(A4)

\begin{gathered} \underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{{sup}_{(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in K (ξ)} F (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n})}{ξ^{\underline{p}}} \\ < {(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}} \underset{\begin{array}{c} (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}}{lim sup} \frac{F (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n})}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} {|t_{i}|}^{p_{i}}}{p_{i}}} \end{gathered}

where $K (ξ) = {(t_{1}, \dots, t_{n}) | \sum_{i = 1}^{n} |t_{i}| \leq ξ}$ (see (3)).

Then, for each

\begin{gathered} λ \in Λ : = \\ ]\frac{1}{\frac{F (t_{1}, \dots, t_{n})}{lim {sup}_{\begin{array}{c} (t_{_{1}}, \dots, t_{n}) \to \infty \\ (t_{_{1}}, \dots, t_{n}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n} \end{array}} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{{∥a_{i}∥}_{1} |t_{i}|}{p_{i}}}}, \frac{{(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(p_{i} C)}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}})}^{\underline{p}}}{lim {inf}_{ξ \to + \infty} \frac{{sup}_{(t_{_{1}}, \dots, t_{_{n}}) \in K (ξ)} F (t_{_{1}}, \dots, t_{n})}{ξ^{\underline{p}}}}[ \end{gathered}

the system

\{\begin{matrix} - Δ_{p_{i}} u_{i} + a_{i} (x) {|u_{i}|}^{p_{i} - 2} u = λ F_{u_{i}} (u_{1}, \dots, u_{n}) & i n Ω, \\ \frac{\partial u_{i}}{\partial ν} = 0 & o n \partial Ω \end{matrix}

has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions in X.

Proof. Set F (x, u₁, ..., u_n) = F (u₁, ..., u_n) for all x ∈ Ω and (u₁, ..., u_n) ∈ ℝⁿ. The conclusion follows from Theorem 3.1. □

Remark 3.1. We observe in Theorem 3.1 we can replace ξ → +∞ and (t₁, ..., t_n) → (+∞, ..., +∞) with ξ → 0⁺ (t₁, ..., t_n) → (0⁺, ..., 0⁺), respectively, that by the same way as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 but using conclusion (c) of Theorem 2.1 instead of (b), the system (1) has a sequence of weak solutions, which strongly converges to 0 in X.

Finally, we give an example to illustrate the result.

Example 3.1. Let Ω ⊂ ℝ² be a non-empty bounded open set with a smooth boundary ϑΩ and consider the increasing sequence of positive real numbers given by

a_{n} : = 2, a_{n + 1} : = n! {(a_{n})}^{\frac{5}{4}} + 2

for every n ≥ 1. Define the function

F (t_{1}, t_{2}) = \{\begin{matrix} {(a_{n + 1})}^{5} e^{- \frac{1}{1 - [{(t_{1} - a_{n + 1})}^{2} + {(t_{2} - a_{n + 1})}^{2}]}} & (t_{1}, t_{2}) \in ⋃_{n \geq 1} B ((a_{n + 1}, a_{n + 1}), 1), \\ 0 & otherwise \end{matrix}

(7)

where B((a_n+1, a_n+1), 1)) be the open unit ball of center (a_n+1, a_n+1). We observe that the function F is non-negative, F (0, 0) = 0, and F ∈ C¹(ℝ²). We will denote by f and g, respectively, the partial derivative of F respect to t₁ and t₂. For every n ∈ ℕ, the restriction F on B((a_n+1, a_n+1), 1) attains its maximum in (a_n+1, a_n+1) and F (a_n+1, a_n+1) = (a_n+1)⁵,

then

\underset{n \to + \infty}{lim sup} \frac{F (a_{n + 1}, a_{n + 1})}{\frac{a_{n + 1}^{3}}{3} + \frac{a_{n + 1}^{4}}{4}} = + \infty

So

\underset{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \to (+ \infty, + \infty)}{lim sup} \frac{F (t_{1}, t_{2})}{\frac{{|t_{1}|}^{3}}{3} + \frac{{|t_{2}|}^{4}}{4}} = + \infty

On the other by setting y_n = a_n+1- 1 for every n ∈ ℕ, one has

sup_{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \in K (y_{n})} F (t_{1}, t_{2}) = a_{n}^{5} \forall n \in ℕ

Then

lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{{sup}_{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \in K (y_{n})} F (t_{1}, t_{2})}{{(a_{n + 1} - 1)}^{3}} = 0,

and hence

\underset{ξ \to \infty}{lim inf} \frac{{sup}_{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \in K (ξ)} F (t_{1}, t_{2})}{ξ^{3}} = 0 .

Finally

\begin{matrix} 0 = \underset{ξ \to + \infty}{lim inf} \frac{{sup}_{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \in K (ξ)} F (t_{1}, t_{2})}{ξ^{3}} \\ < {({(3 C)}^{\frac{1}{3}} + {(4 C)}^{\frac{1}{4}})}^{3} \underset{(t_{1}, t_{2}) \to {(+ \infty, + \infty)}_{(t_{_{1}}, t_{_{2}}) \in ℝ_{+}^{n}}}{lim sup} \frac{F (t_{1}, t_{2})}{\frac{{|t_{1}|}^{3}}{3} + \frac{{|t_{2}|}^{4}}{4}} = + \infty . \end{matrix}

So, since all assumptions of Theorem 3.3 is applicable to the system

\{\begin{matrix} - Δ_{3} u + |u| u = λ f (u, v) & in Ω, \\ - Δ_{4} v + {|v|}^{2} g = λ g (u, v) & in Ω, \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial ν} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial ν} = 0 & on \partial Ω \end{matrix}

for every λ ∈ [0, +∞[.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Tehran, Iran

(2)

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Mazandaran, 47416-1467 Babolsar, Iran

References

Ricceri B: A general variational principle and some of its applications. J Comput Appl Math 2000, 113: 401-410. 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: Infinitely many solutions for a boundary value problem with discontinuous nonlinearities. Bound Value Probl 2009, 2009: 1-20.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Marano S, Motreanu D: Infinitely many critical points of non-differentiable functions and applications to the Neumann-type problem involving the p -Laplacian. J Diff Equ 2002, 182: 108-120. 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4092MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, D'Aguì G: On the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian. J Math Anal Appl 2009, 358: 223-228. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.04.055MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Di Bella B: Infinitely many solutions for a fourth-order elastic beam equation. Nonlinear Diff Equ Appl NoDEA 2011, 18: 357-368. 10.1007/s00030-011-0099-0MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: A remark on perturbed elliptic Neumann problems. Studia Univ "Babeş-Bolyai", Mathematica 2010., LV(4):Google Scholar
Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G: Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving the p -Laplacian. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh 2010, 140A: 737-752.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G, O'Regan D: Infinitely many weak solutions for a class of quasilinear elliptic systems. Math Comput Model 2010, 52: 152-160. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.004MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Molica Bisci G, Rădulescu V: Infinitely many solutions for a class of nonlinear eigenvalue problems in Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. C R Acad Sci Paris, Ser I 2011, 349: 263-268. 10.1016/j.crma.2011.02.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Candito P: Infinitely many solutions to the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian and with discontinuous nonlinearities. Proc Edin Math Soc 2002, 45: 397-409.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Candito P, Livrea R: Infinitely many solutions for a nonlinear Navier boundary value problem involving the p -biharmonic. Studia Univ "Babeş-Bolyai", Mathematica 2010., LV(4):Google Scholar
Dai G: Infinitely many solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p ( x )-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 2297-2305. 10.1016/j.na.2008.03.009MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fan X, Ji C: Existence of infinitely many solutions for a Neumann problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. J Math Anal Appl 2007, 334: 248-260. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.12.055MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kristály A: Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in ℝ ^N . J Diff Equ 2006, 220: 511-530. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.02.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Li C: The existence of infinitely many solutions of a class of nonlinear elliptic equations with a Neumann boundary conditions for both resonance and oscillation problems. Nonlinear Anal 2003, 54: 431-443. 10.1016/S0362-546X(03)00100-7MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ricceri B: Infinitely many solutions of the Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p -Laplacian. Bull Lond Math Soc 2001, 33(3):331-340. 10.1017/S0024609301008001MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Afrouzi GA, Heidarkhani S: Existence of three solutions for a class of Dirichlet quasi-linear elliptic systems involving the ( p₁, ..., p_n)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 135-143. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.038MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Afrouzi GA, Heidarkhani S, O'Regan D: Three solutions to a class of Neumann doubly eigenvalue elliptic systems driven by a ( p₁, ..., p_n)-Laplacian. Bull Korean Math Soc 2010, 47(6):1235-1250. 10.4134/BKMS.2010.47.6.1235MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Heidarkhani S, O'Regan D: Multiple solutions for a class of Dirichlet quasilinear elliptic systems driven by a (p, q)-Laplacian operator. Dyn Syst Appl 2011, 20: 89-100.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Heidarkhani S, Tian Y: Multiplicity results for a class of gradient systems depending on two parameters. Nonlinear Anal 2010, 73: 547-554. 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.051MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Heidarkhani S, Tian Y: Three solutions for a class of gradient Kirchhoff-type systems depending on two parameters. Dyn Syst Appl 2011, 20: 551-562.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Zeidler E: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications. Volume II. Springer, New York; 1985.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bonanno G, Candito P: Three solutions to a Neumann problem for elliptic equations involving the p-Laplacian. Arch Math (Basel) 2003, 80: 424-429.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.