 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Positive solutions for singular boundary value problems involving integral conditions
Boundary Value Problems volume 2012, Article number: 72 (2012)
Abstract
We are interested in the following singular boundary value problem:
where \mu >0 is a parameter and {\int}_{0}^{1}u(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dA(s) is the Stieltjes integral. The function w\in C((0,1),(0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and w may be singular at t=0 and/or t=1, f\in C([0,+\mathrm{\infty}),(0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and {f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}=+\mathrm{\infty}. Some a priori estimates and the existence, multiplicity and nonexistence of positive solutions are obtained. Our proofs are based on the method of global continuous theorem, the lowerupper solutions methods and fixed point index theory. Furthermore, we also discuss the interval of parameter μ such that the problem has a positive solution.
1 Introduction
We are concerned with the second order nonlocal boundary value problem:
where \mu >0 is a parameter and {\int}_{0}^{1}u(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dA(s) is a Stieltjes integral. The function w\in C((0,1),(0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and w may be singular at t=0 and/or t=1, f\in C([0,+\mathrm{\infty}),(0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and {f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}={lim}_{u\to \mathrm{\infty}}\frac{f(u)}{u}=+\mathrm{\infty}.
Integral boundary conditions and multipoint boundary conditions for differential equations come from many areas of applied mathematics and physics [1–7]. Recently, singular boundary value problems have been extensively considered in a lot of literature [1, 2, 5, 8], since they model many physical phenomena including gas diffusion through porous media, nonlinear diffusion generated by nonlinear sources, chemically reacting systems as well as concentration in chemical or biological problems. In all these problems, positive solutions are very meaningful.
In [1, 2], Webb and Infante considered the existence of positive solutions of nonlinear boundary value problem:
where h g are nonnegative functions, subjected to the nonlocal boundary conditions
Here \alpha [u] is a linear functional on C[0,1] given by
involving a Stieltjes integral with a signed measure, that is, A has bounded variation. They dealt with many boundary conditions given in the literature in a unified way by utilizing the fixed point index theory in cones.
Recently, many researchers were interested in the global structure of positive solutions for the nonlinear boundary value problem (see, e.g., [3, 6, 7]). In 2009, Ma and An [3] considered the problem (1.1). Assume that
(A0) A:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R} is nondecreasing and A(t) is not a constant on (0,1), 0\le \kappa <1 with \kappa :={\int}_{0}^{1}t\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dA(t), and {\int}_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dA(t)\ge 0 for s\in [0,1] (for the definition of G(t,s), see (2.1) below).
(A1) w:(0,1)\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is continuous and w(t)\ne 0 on any subinterval of [0,1], and w\mathrm{\Phi}\in {L}^{1}[0,1]\cap C(0,1), where \mathrm{\Phi}(s)=s(1s), s\in [0,1].
(A2) f\in C([0,+\mathrm{\infty}),[0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and f(s)>0 for s>0.
(A3) {f}_{0}={f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}=0, where {f}_{0}={lim}_{u\to {0}^{+}}\frac{f(u)}{u} and {f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}={lim}_{u\to \mathrm{\infty}}\frac{f(u)}{u}.
They obtained the following main result:
Theorem 1.1 ([3], Theorem 4.1])
Assume that (A 0)(A 3) hold. Then there exists a component\mathfrak{T}in ∑ which joins(\mathrm{\infty},\theta )to(\mathrm{\infty},\mathrm{\infty}), and
for some{\rho}^{\ast}>0. Moreover, there exists{\mu}^{\ast}\ge {\rho}^{\ast}>0such that (1.1) has at least two positive solutions for\mu \in ({\mu}^{\ast},\mathrm{\infty}). Here\mathfrak{T}joins(\mathrm{\infty},\theta )to(\mathrm{\infty},\mathrm{\infty})such that
Here, ∑ is the closure of the set of positive solutions of (1.1) on [0,\mathrm{\infty})\times X, X=\{u\in {C}^{1}[0,1]:u(0)=0,u(1)={\int}_{0}^{1}u(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds\}, and the component of a set M is a maximal connected subset of M.
A natural problem arises: How can we consider the global structure of positive solutions for the case {f}_{0}={f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}=\mathrm{\infty}?
In this paper, we first obtain the global structure of positive solutions by the use of global continuous theorem, and some a priori estimates. Applying the analysis technique, we construct the lower and upper solutions. Those combined with the fixed point index theory, the existence, multiplicity and nonexistence of positive solutions to (1.1) in the case {f}_{0}={f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}=\mathrm{\infty} are investigated. Finally, we discuss the interval of parameter μ such that the problem (1.1) has positive solutions. The proof of the method which is based on the construction of some bounds of the solution together with global continuous theorem and fixed point index is of independent interest, and is different from the other papers.
This paper is arranged as follows. We will give some hypotheses and lemmas in Section 2. In Section 3, new criteria of the existence, multiplicity and nonexistence of a positive solution are obtained. Moreover, an example is given to illustrate our result.
2 Preliminaries and lemmas
Let X denote the Banach space C[0,1] with the maximum norm
Define K:=\{u\in C[0,1]:u\text{is concave in}[0,1]\text{and}u(t)\ge 0\}, then K is a cone. Let
Denote
Throughout this paper, we suppose that the following conditions hold:
(H0) A:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R} is nondecreasing, dA(t)\ge 0 on (0,1) and \kappa :={\int}_{0}^{1}t\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dA(t) with 0\le \kappa <1.
(H1) w\in C((0,1),(0,+\mathrm{\infty})) and w may be singular at t=0 and/or 1, satisfying
(H2) f\in C([0,\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty})) (f(0)>0 obviously holds).
(H3) {f}_{\mathrm{\infty}}={lim}_{u\to \mathrm{\infty}}\frac{f(u)}{u}=+\mathrm{\infty}.
Remark 2.1 It is easy to see from (H0) that G(s)\le [A(1)A(0)]G(s,s). Therefore, if we assume that 0<{\int}_{0}^{1}G(s,s)w(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds<\mathrm{\infty}, then (2.3) obviously holds.
Define an operator T:K\to X as follows:
Assume that the conditions (H0)(H2) hold, then it is easy to verify that T:K\to K is well defined and completely continuous.
Lemma 2.1 ([9] Global continuation theorem)
Let X be a Banach space and let K be an order cone in X. Consider the equation
where\mu \in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}=[0,\mathrm{\infty})andu\in X. Suppose thatT:{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\times K\to Kis completely continuous andT(0,u)=\thetafor allu\in K, then{\mathfrak{L}}_{+}(K), the component of the solution set of (2.4) containing(0,0)is unbounded.
Remark 2.2

(1)
We note that u is a positive solution of the problem (1.1) if and only if u=T(\mu ,u) on K.

(2)
If T(\mu ,\theta )\ne \theta for \mu \ne 0 and T(0,u)=\theta for all u\in K, then we get from Lemma 2.1 that there exists an unbounded continuum \mathfrak{L} emanating from (0,\theta ) in the closure of the set of positive solutions (1.1) in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}\times K.
Lemma 2.2 ([10])
Let X be a Banach space, K an order cone in X and\mathcal{S}an open bounded set in X with\theta \in \mathcal{S}. Suppose thatT:\overline{\mathcal{S}}\cap K\to Kis a completely continuous operator. IfTy\ne \lambda y, for ally\in \partial \mathcal{S}\cap Kand all\lambda \ge 1, theni(T,\mathcal{S}\cap K,K)=1.
3 Main results
Lemma 3.1 Let (H 0)(H 3) hold and let\mathcal{J}=[{\mu}_{0},\mathrm{\infty})with{\mu}_{0}>0. Then there exists a constant{Q}_{\mathcal{J}}>0such that for all\mu \in \mathcal{J}and all possible positive solutions{u}_{\mu}of (1.1), the inequality\parallel {u}_{\mu}\parallel <{Q}_{\mathcal{J}}holds.
Proof Suppose on the contrary that there exist a sequence \{{\mu}_{n}\}\subset \mathcal{J} and a sequence \{{u}_{{\mu}_{n}}\} of the positive solutions of (1.1) corresponding to {\mu}_{n} such that
Denote {u}_{n}:={u}_{{\mu}_{n}}. From the concavity of {u}_{n}, it follows that
Choose \eta :=\frac{10{\pi}^{2}}{{\mu}_{0}w}, where w={min}_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]}w(t). Then we find from (H3) that there exists a constant R>0 such that
Since {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {u}_{n}\parallel =\mathrm{\infty}, we get
This, together with (3.1) and (3.2), implies
Put \psi (t):=cos2\pi t, for t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]. Hence, we know from (3.3) that
On the other hand, multiplying (1.1) by ψ and integrating by parts, we obtain that
leads to
i.e.,
This is a contradiction. □
Lemma 3.2 Assume that the hypotheses (H 0)(H 3) hold. Then there exists\rho >0such that if the problem (1.1) has a positive solution for parameter μ, then\mu \le \rho.
Proof Let u be a positive solution of (1.1) corresponding to μ. From the hypotheses (H2) and (H3), it follows that there exists \varrho >0 such that f(u)\ge \varrho u for all u>0. Consequently, we have
Let {\lambda}_{1} be the first eigenvalue of
and let {\phi}_{1} be the positive eigenfunction corresponding to {\lambda}_{1} (see [8]). It is easy to see that {\phi}_{1}^{\prime}(1)\le 0. Multiplying (3.4) by {\phi}_{1} and integrating by parts, we get that
implies
This completes the proof. □
Lemma 3.3 Assume that (H 0)(H 3) hold. Then we have
Proof Suppose this fails, that is, there exists \{(\mu ,{u}_{\mu})\}\subset \mathfrak{L} such that
where {M}_{0} is a positive constant. Since (\mu ,{u}_{\mu})\in \mathfrak{L}, we get that for all t\in [0,1]
where
Hence, we find that
Thus, it implies that \mu \nrightarrow 0. This is contradiction. □
Theorem 3.1 Assume that the conditions (H 0)(H 3) hold and{\int}_{0}^{1}dA(t)<1. Then there exists a constant{\mu}_{1}>0such that the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions for0<\mu <{\mu}_{1}, and at least one positive solution for\mu ={\mu}_{1}, and no positive solution for\mu >{\mu}_{1}.
Proof Define
From Lemma 2.1 and Remark 2.2, we can find that there exists an unbounded continuum \mathfrak{L} emanating from (0,\theta ) in the closure of the set of positive solutions in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}\times K and T(0,u)=\theta for all u\in K. Meanwhile, Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.3 respectively imply that {u}_{\mu} is bounded (\mu >0, \mu \nrightarrow 0) and unbounded (\mu >0, \mu \to 0 and \parallel {u}_{\mu}\parallel \ge 1). Therefore, we conclude that the set of (3.5) is nonempty. Those combined with Lemma 3.2 follows that {\mu}_{1}>0 is well defined and {\mu}_{1}\in (0,\rho ]. From the definition of {\mu}_{1}, it is easy to see that the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions for \mu \in (0,{\mu}_{1}). Again, since the continuum is a compact connected set and T is a completely continuous operator, the problem (1.1) has at least one positive solution at \mu ={\mu}_{1}.
Next, we only show that the problem (1.1) has no positive solution for any \mu >{\mu}_{1}. Suppose on the contrary that there exists some {\mu}_{2} (>{\mu}_{1}) such that the problem (1.1) has a positive solution {u}_{2} corresponding to {\mu}_{2}. Then we will prove that the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions for any \mu \in [{\mu}_{1},{\mu}_{2}) which contradicts the definition of (3.5).
For the sake of obtaining the contradiction, we divide the proof into four steps.
Step 1. Constructing a modified boundary value problem.
Choose arbitrarily a constant \mu \in [{\mu}_{1},{\mu}_{2}). Since f is uniformly continuous on [0,\parallel {u}_{2}\parallel +1], there exists a constant \sigma >0 such that
where
Denote \zeta (t):={u}_{2}(t)+\sigma, for t\in [0,1]. Then we claim that
and
Indeed, using (3.6), we have
Define a set \mathcal{S}:=\{u\in C[0,1]0<u(t)<\zeta (t),t\in (0,1)\}. Then the set \mathcal{S} is bounded and open in C[0,1]. Now, we construct the modified secondorder boundary value problem:
where \xi :\mathbb{R}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+} is defined by
Step 2. We will show that if u is a positive solution of (3.9), then u\in \mathcal{S}\cap K.
Let u be a positive solution of (3.9), then we claim that
Suppose this fails, that is, u\notin \mathcal{S}\cap K. Clearly, we only show that u(t)\nless \zeta (t), for t\in (0,1]. Comparing the boundary conditions (3.8) and (3.9), the only following three cases need to be considered. Case I. There exists {t}_{1}\in (0,1) such that u({t}_{1})=\zeta ({t}_{1}) and 0<u(t)<\zeta (t), for t\in ({t}_{1}{\sigma}_{1},{t}_{1})\cup ({t}_{1},{t}_{1}+{\sigma}_{1}) and some {\sigma}_{1}>0; Case II. There exists {t}_{2}\in (0,1] such that u({t}_{2})=\zeta ({t}_{2}) and u(t)\ge \zeta (t) for t\in ({t}_{2},1]. Case III. There exists [{t}_{3},{t}_{4}]\subset (0,1] such that u(t)\ge \zeta (t), t\in [{t}_{3},{t}_{4}], u({t}_{3})=\zeta ({t}_{3}) and u({t}_{4})=\zeta ({t}_{4}). See the three Figures 1, 2 and 3.
Case I. From (3.7), it implies that there exists a constant {\u03f5}_{1}>0 such that
Since f is uniformly continuous on [0,\parallel {u}_{2}\parallel +1], there exists a {\sigma}_{1}^{\prime}>0 such that if u,v\in [0,\parallel \zeta \parallel ] and uv<{\sigma}_{1}^{\prime}, then we get
where W:=\mu {max}_{t\in [{t}_{1}{\sigma}_{1},{t}_{1}+{\sigma}_{1}]}w(t)>0. From the assumption of Case I, it follows that there exists a subinterval [r,s]\subset ({t}_{1}{\sigma}_{1},{t}_{1}+{\sigma}_{1}) with {t}_{1}\in (r,s) such that
and
This together with (3.11) and (3.12) leads to
This is a contradiction.
Case II. Let x(t):=u(t)\zeta (t), for t\in [0,1]. Then we have that for t\in ({t}_{2},1]
Obviously, we have {x}^{\prime}({t}_{2})\ge 0. From (3.13), it implies that {x}^{\prime}(t)>0, for any t\in ({t}_{2},1]. Hence, the function x(t) is strictly increasing in [{t}_{2},1]. From (3.8) and the boundary condition (3.9), we find
We obtain a contradiction. In particular, if {t}_{2}=1, then we obtain
This contradicts (3.13).
Case III. Since \xi (u(t))=\zeta (t), for t\in ({t}_{3},{t}_{4}), we have that {(u(t)\zeta (t))}^{\u2033}>0, for t\in ({t}_{3},{t}_{4}). Again since (u\zeta )({t}_{3})=(u\zeta )({t}_{4})=0, we know from the maximum principle that u(t)<\zeta (t), for t\in ({t}_{3},{t}_{4}). This contradicts the assumption of Case III.
Therefore, we conclude that the claim (3.10) holds.
Step 3. i({\tilde{T}}_{\mu},\mathcal{S}\cap K,K)=1 (the definition of {\tilde{T}}_{\mu} see below).
Using (2.2), we define an operator {\tilde{T}}_{\mu}:K\to X by
Then {\tilde{T}}_{\mu}:K\to K is completely continuous and u is a positive solution of (3.9) if and only if u={\tilde{T}}_{\mu}(u) on K. From the definition of \xi (u(t)), it implies that there exists {R}_{1}>0 such that \parallel {\tilde{T}}_{\mu}u\parallel <{R}_{1}, for all u\in K. Consequently, we get from Lemma 2.2 that
where {B}_{{R}_{1}}=\{u\in X:\parallel u\parallel <{R}_{1}\}. Applying the conclusion of Step 2 and the excision property of fixed point index, we find that
Step 4. We conclude that the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions corresponding to μ.
Since the problem (1.1) is equivalent to the problem (3.9) on \mathcal{S}\cap K, we get that the problem (1.1) has a positive solution in \mathcal{S}\cap K. Without loss of generality, we may suppose that T has no fixed point on \partial \mathcal{S}\cap K (otherwise the proof is completed). Then i(T,\mathcal{S}\cap K,K) is well defined and (3.15) implies
On the other hand, from Lemma 3.2, we choose {\mu}_{\ast}>\rho such that the problem (1.1) has no positive solution in K. By a priori estimate in \mathcal{J}=[\mu ,{\mu}_{\ast}], there exists {R}_{2}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}(>{R}_{1})>0 such that for all possible positive solutions {u}_{\lambda} of (1.1) with \lambda \in [\mu ,{\mu}_{\ast}], we know that \parallel {u}_{\lambda}\parallel <{R}_{2}. Define \mathfrak{G}:[0,1]\times ({\overline{B}}_{{R}_{2}}\cap K)\to K by
Then it is easy to verify that \mathfrak{G} is completely continuous on [0,1]\times K and \mathfrak{G}(\nu ,u)\ne u for all (\nu ,u)\in [0,1]\times (\partial {B}_{{R}_{2}}\cap K). From the property of homotopy invariance, it follows that
Hence, by the additivity property and (3.16), we have
Then we conclude that the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions corresponding to μ. □
Remark 3.1

(i)
From the hypotheses (H2) and (H3), it implies that there exists L>0 such that
\mathcal{D}=\frac{f(L)}{L}=\underset{u>0}{min}\frac{f(u)}{u}.(3.17)
Let f attain its maximum at the point {L}^{\ast} of [0,L]. If {\int}_{0}^{1}{G}_{1}(t,s)w(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds<\mathrm{\infty}, then adopting the similar method as in [11], Theorem 1], we get that for 0<\mu <{(\frac{f({L}^{\ast})}{L}{\int}_{0}^{1}{G}_{1}(t,s)w(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds)}^{1}, the problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions {u}_{1}(t) and {u}_{2}(t) such that 0<\parallel {u}_{1}\parallel <L<\parallel {u}_{2}\parallel by the use of compression of conical shells in [12], Corollary 20.1]. Consequently, we know that {\mu}_{1}\ge {(\frac{f({L}^{\ast})}{L}{\int}_{0}^{1}{G}_{1}(t,s)w(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds)}^{1}.

(ii)
If u is a positive solution of the equation (1.1) corresponding to μ, then we have
\parallel u\parallel =\underset{t\in [0,1]}{max}u(t)=\mu \underset{t\in [0,1]}{max}{\int}_{0}^{1}{G}_{1}(t,s)w(s)f(u(s))\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds
i.e., from (3.17),
Therefore, we get that {\mu}^{\ast}\le {(\mathcal{D}{max}_{t\in [0,1]}{\int}_{0}^{1}{G}_{1}(t,s)w(s)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}ds)}^{1}.
Corollary 3.1 Assume that (H 1)(H 3) hold. Consider the following mpoint boundary value problem
where μ is a positive parameter, {\alpha}_{i}\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), i=1,2,\dots ,m2, 0<{\eta}_{1}<\cdots <{\eta}_{m2}<1and0\le {\sum}_{i=1}^{m2}{\alpha}_{i}{\eta}_{i}<1. Then there exists a constant\overline{\mu}>0such that the problem (3.18) has at least two positive solutions for0<\mu <\overline{\mu}, and at least one positive solution for\mu =\overline{\mu}, and no positive solution for\mu >\overline{\mu}.
Proof In the boundary condition of (1.1), if we let
where \chi (s) is the characteristic function on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), i.e.,
Then the boundary condition of (1.1) reduces to the mpoint boundary condition of (3.18). Applying the method of Theorem 3.1, we get the conclusion. □
Example 3.1 We consider the following singular boundary value problem:
where A(s)={s}^{2}(2s).
Computing yields
We find that for any t\in (0,1],
Thus, it implies that (2.3) holds. It is easy to verify that the conditions (H2) and (H3) hold. Therefore, by Theorem 3.1, we obtain that there exists a constant {\mu}_{1}>0 such that the problem (3.19) has at least two positive solutions for 0<\mu <{\mu}_{1}, and at least one positive solution for \mu ={\mu}_{1}, and no positive solution for \mu >{\mu}_{1}.
Author’s contributions
The author typed, read and approved the final manuscript.
References
Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems: a unified approach. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2006, 74: 673693. 10.1112/S0024610706023179
Webb JRL, Infante G: Positive solutions of nonlocal boundary value problems involving integral conditions. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 2008, 15: 4567. 10.1007/s0003000740677
Ma RY, An YL: Global structure of positive solutions for nonlocal boundary value problems involving integral conditions. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2009, 71: 43644376. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.113
Anderson DR, Smyrlis G: Solvability for a thirdorder threepoint boundary value problem on time scales. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 49: 19942001. 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.11.009
Lan KQ, Webb JRL: Positive solutions of semilinear differential equations with singularities. J. Differ. Equ. 1998, 148: 407421. 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3475
Li HY, Sun JX: Positive solutions of superlinear semipositone nonlinear boundary value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 28062815. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.051
Rynne B: Spectral properties and nodal solutions for secondorder, m point, boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2007, 67: 33183327. 10.1016/j.na.2006.10.014
Asakawa H: On nonresonant singular twopoint boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 47: 48494860. 10.1016/S0362546X(01)005971
Zeidler E: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications, I. FixedPoint Theorems. Springer, New York; 1986.
Guo DJ, Lakshmikantham V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones. Academic Press, New York; 1988.
Sánchez J: Multiple positive solutions of singular eigenvalue type problems involving the onedimensional p Laplacian. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 292: 401414. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.005
Deimling K: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Springer, Berlin; 1985.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the anonymous referees very much for helpful comments and suggestions which led to the improvement of presentation and quality of the work. The work was supported partly by NSCF of Tianyuan Youth Foundation (No. 11126125), K. C. Wong Magna Fund of Ningbo University, Subject Foundation of Ningbo University (No. xkl11044) and Hulan’s Excellent Doctor Foundation of Ningbo University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, LG. Positive solutions for singular boundary value problems involving integral conditions. Bound Value Probl 2012, 72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/16872770201272
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/16872770201272