- Research
- Open Access

# Noncommutativity of mappings in hybrid fixed point results

- Hemant Kumar Pathak
^{1}and - Rosana Rodríguez-López
^{2}Email author

**2013**:145

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-145

© Pathak and Rodríguez-López; licensee Springer. 2013

**Received:**10 December 2012**Accepted:**25 May 2013**Published:**11 June 2013

## Abstract

In this note, some coincidence and common fixed points of nonlinear hybrid mappings have been obtained under certain noncommutativity conditions of mappings. Our results improve several known results in the field of hybrid fixed point theory.

**MSC:**54H25, 47H10, 54C60.

## Keywords

- coincidence point
- fixed point
- occasionally coincidentally idempotent
- multi-valued mappings

## Introduction

As a generalization of the Banach fixed point theorem, Nadler’s contraction principle has lead to an excellent fixed point result in the area of nonlinear analysis. Some other works focused on fixed point results for multi-valued mappings are, for instance, [1–5]. Coincidence and common fixed points of nonlinear hybrid contractions (*i.e.*, contractions involving single-valued and multi-valued mappings) have been recently studied by many authors. To mention some of the achievements, we cite, for example, [6–12].

The concept of commutativity of single-valued mappings [13] was extended in [14] to the setting of a single-valued mapping and a multi-valued mapping on a metric space. This concept of commutativity has been further generalized by different authors, *viz* weakly commuting [15], compatible [16], weakly compatible [8]. It is interesting to note that in all the results obtained so far concerning common fixed points of hybrid mappings the (single-valued and multi-valued) mappings under consideration satisfy either the commutativity condition or one of its generalizations (see, for instance, [6–10]). In this note, we show the existence of fixed points of hybrid contractions which do not satisfy any of the commutativity conditions or its above-mentioned generalizations. Our result extends and improves several well-known results in the field of hybrid fixed point theory. Some other recent related references are [17, 18], where common fixed point theorems for hybrid mappings on a symmetric space are proved under the assumptions of weak compatibility and occasional weak compatibility. Some analogous results for the case of contractivity conditions of integral type are presented in [19–21] and generalized contractive hybrid pairs are considered in [22]. Finally, in [23], fixed point results are proved in topological vector space valued cone metric spaces (with nonnormal cones).

## Preliminaries

*d*. For $f:X\to X$ and $T:X\to CL(X)$, we shall use the following notations:

We recall some definitions.

**Definition 1** Mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *commuting* at a point $x\in X$ if $fTx\subseteq Tfx$. The mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *commuting* on *X* if $fTx\subseteq Tfx$ for all $x\in X$.

**Definition 2**Mappings

*f*and

*T*are said to be

*weakly commuting at a point*$x\in X$ if

*f*and

*T*are said to be

*weakly commuting on X*if

for all $x\in X$.

**Definition 3** The mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *compatible* if $fTx\in CB(X)$ for all $x\in X$ and ${lim}_{n\to +\mathrm{\infty}}H(Tf{x}_{n},fT{x}_{n})=0$, whenever $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is a sequence in *X* such that $T{x}_{n}\to M\in CB(X)$ and $f{x}_{n}\to t\in M$, as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$.

**Definition 4**The mappings

*f*and

*T*are said to be

*f*-

*weak compatible*if $fTx\in CB(X)$ for all $x\in X$ and the following limits exist and satisfy the inequalities:

- (i)
${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}H(Tf{x}_{n},fT{x}_{n})\le {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}H(Tf{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})$,

- (ii)
${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d(fT{x}_{n},f{x}_{n})\le {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}H(Tf{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})$,

whenever $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is a sequence in *X* such that $T{x}_{n}\to M\in CB(X)$ and $f{x}_{n}\to t\in M$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$.

Let $C(T,f)$ denote the set of all coincidence points of the mappings *f* and *T*, that is, $C(T,f)=\{u:fu\in Tu\}$.

**Definition 5** The mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *coincidentally commuting* if they commute at their coincidence points.

**Definition 6** Mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *coincidentally idempotent* if $ffu=fu$ for every $u\in C(T,f)$, that is, if *f* is idempotent at the coincidence points of *f* and *T*.

**Definition 7** Mappings *f* and *T* are said to be *occasionally coincidentally idempotent* (or, in brief, oci) if $ffu=fu$ for some $u\in C(T,f)$.

It should be remarked that *coincidentally idempotent* pairs of mappings are *occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, but the converse is not necessarily true as shown in Example 18 of this note.

## Main results

We recall the following lemma.

**Lemma 8** [8]

*Let* $T:Y\to CB(X)$ *and* $f:Y\to X$ *be* *f*-*weak compatible*. *If* $\{fw\}=Tw$ *for some* $w\in Y$ *and* $H(Tx,Ty)\le h(a\cdot L(x,y)+(1-a)\cdot N(x,y))$ *for all* *x*, *y* *in* *Y*, *where* $0<h<1$, $0\le a\le 1$, *then* $fTw=Tfw$.

We remark that the above-mentioned lemma has been used in [8, 9] and [10] to prove the existence of fixed points of hybrid mappings. However, we have noticed some typos in its original statement which have been rectified in the above statement without altering the proof.

Next, we prove a fixed point result for hybrid mappings under a general integral-type contractivity condition. In contrast to [20], we avoid the complete character of the base space *X*, and we introduce hybrid mappings. With respect to the study in [21], we consider here occasionally coincidentally idempotent mappings.

**Theorem 9**

*Let*

*Y*

*be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that*

*that is*, ${\bigcup}_{y\in Y}T(y)\subseteq f(Y)$,

*is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is nonnegative*,

*summable on each compact interval and such that*

*which trivially implies that*

*and*

*Suppose also that*

*where*$\gamma :(1,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}_{+}$

*is such that*

*and*

*Then* *T* *and* *f* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if* *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

*Proof*In view of (1) and Nadler’s remark in [24], given the point ${x}_{0}\in Y$, we can construct two sequences $\{{x}_{n}\}$ in

*Y*and $\{{y}_{n}\}$ in

*X*such that, for each $n\in \mathbb{N}$,

Indeed, since $T{x}_{0}\subseteq f(Y)$, there exists ${x}_{1}\in Y$ such that $f{x}_{1}={y}_{1}\in T{x}_{0}$. Besides, given ${y}_{1}\in T{x}_{0}$, by Nadler’s remark in [24] and using that ${q}^{-1/2}>1$, we can choose ${y}_{2}\in T{x}_{1}\subseteq f(Y)$ such that $d({y}_{1},{y}_{2})\le {q}^{-1/2}\cdot H(T{x}_{0},T{x}_{1})$ and ${y}_{2}=f{x}_{2}$ for a certain ${x}_{2}\in Y$. The continuation of this process allows to construct the two above-mentioned sequences $\{{x}_{n}\}$ and $\{{y}_{n}\}$ inductively.

which tends to zero as $m\to +\mathrm{\infty}$.

Since $f(Y)$ is complete, then the sequence $\{f{x}_{n}\}$ has a limit in $f(Y)$, say *u*. Let $w\in {f}^{-1}(u)$ and prove that $fw\in Tw$.

*Tw*closed, and

*n*large enough, we have

*n*tend to +∞ in the previous inequality, we have

and, therefore, since $q<1$ and $d(fw,Tw)>0$, we get ${\int}_{0}^{d(fw,Tw)}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt<{\int}_{0}^{d(fw,Tw)}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt$, which is a contradiction. Hence $fw\in Tw$, that is, *w* is a coincidence point for *T* and *f*.

*ψ*, we get $H(T{x}_{n-1},T{x}_{n})\to 0$ as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$. From the definition of $\{{y}_{n}\}$, we deduce that $d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})\le H(T{x}_{n-1},T{x}_{n})$ for every

*n*and, therefore, ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})=0$, so that $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is asymptotically

*T*-regular with respect to

*f*. However, this property can be deduced directly from the fact that

*f*and

*T*are occasionally coincidentally idempotent, then $ffw=fw$ for some $w\in C(T,f)$. Then we have

which is a contradiction. Hence $Tfw=Tw$. Thus we have $fw=ffw$ and $fw\in Tw=Tfw$, *i.e.*, *fw* is a common fixed point of *f* and *T*. □

*ϕ*from the set ${\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ of nonnegative real numbers to itself such that

**Corollary 10**

*Let*

*Y*

*be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that*$T(Y)\subseteq f(Y)$,

*for all*

*x*,

*y*

*in*

*Y*,

*where*$\varphi \in \mathrm{\Phi}$ (

*satisfying*(11)

*for a certain*$q\in (0,1)$),

$\psi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ *is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is nonnegative*, *summable on each compact interval and such that* (4) *holds*. *Suppose also that* (7), (8) *and* (9) *hold for a certain* $\gamma :(1,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ *and* *q* *determined by* (11). *Then* *T* *and* *f* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if* *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

*Proof*It is a consequence of Theorem 9 since (11) and (12) imply that

for all *x*, *y* in *Y* and $q\in (0,1)$. □

**Remark 11**The condition

*γ*the identity mapping. Moreover, for $0<q<1$, hypotheses (8) and (9) are trivially satisfied for this choice of

*γ*. Indeed, using that $0<q<1$, we get

**Remark 12** Assuming (8), condition (9) is trivially valid if $\lambda \cdot \gamma (\frac{1}{\lambda})\le 1$ for every $\lambda \in (0,1)$ or, equivalently, $\gamma (\frac{1}{\lambda})\le \frac{1}{\lambda}$ for every $\lambda \in (0,1)$, that is, $\gamma (z)\le z$ for every $z>1$. Note that this last condition is trivially valid for *γ* the identity mapping. Moreover, if $\gamma (z)\le z$ for every $z>1$, then $\gamma (z)<{z}^{2}$ for every $z>1$ and, therefore, if $q\in (0,1)$, then $\gamma ({q}^{-1/2})<{q}^{-1}$, obtaining (8) if $\gamma ({q}^{-1/2})>0$.

**Remark 13**According to Remark 12, for $q\in (0,1)$ fixed and

*ψ*satisfying (4), an admissible function

*γ*can be obtained by taking

provided that $\gamma ({q}^{-1/2})>0$ and $\gamma (z)\le z$ for every $z>1$.

**Example 14**Taking

*ψ*as the constant function $\psi (t)=K>0$, $t>0$, in the statement of Theorem 9, condition (7) is reduced to

so that we must choose *γ* as a nonnegative function satisfying that $\gamma (z)=z$ for $z>1$ (obviously, $\gamma ({q}^{-1/2})>0$ since $q\in (0,1)$) in order to guarantee conditions (7), (8) and (9).

**Example 15** A simple calculation provides that, for the function $\psi (t)=t$, $t>0$, condition (7) is written as $\gamma (z)\ge {z}^{2}$ for $z>1$ and, therefore, in this case condition (8) is never fulfilled. If we take $\psi (t)=K{t}^{m}$, $t>0$, for $K>0$ and $m>0$ fixed, then (7) implies that $\gamma (z)\ge {z}^{m+1}>z$ for $z>1$.

**Example 16**Now, we choose $\psi (t)=K{t}^{m}$, $t>0$, where $K>0$ and $-1<m<0$ are fixed. Note that the case $m=0$ has already been studied in Example 14. In this case $-1<m<0$, condition (7) is reduced to

*γ*satisfying that

Of course, $\gamma (z)=z$ and $\gamma (z)={z}^{m+1}$ are valid choices.

**Example 17**Take $\psi (t)={e}^{-t}$, $t>0$. Condition (7) is equivalent to

Now, for each $z>1$ fixed, we calculate ${sup}_{\u03f5>0}\frac{1-{e}^{-z\u03f5}}{1-{e}^{-\u03f5}}$, which is obviously positive, and we check that its value is equal to *z*.

It is easy to prove that for $z>1$ fixed, the function $\u03f5\in (0,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathcal{R}}_{z}(\u03f5)=\frac{1-{e}^{-z\u03f5}}{1-{e}^{-\u03f5}}$ is decreasing on $(0,+\mathrm{\infty})$. Indeed, the sign of its derivative coincides with the sign of the function $\nu (\u03f5)=z{e}^{-z\u03f5}(1-{e}^{-\u03f5})-(1-{e}^{-z\u03f5}){e}^{-\u03f5}$ and also with the sign of $\tau (\u03f5)=z{e}^{-z\u03f5}({e}^{\u03f5}-1)+{e}^{-z\u03f5}-1$ for $\u03f5\in (0,+\mathrm{\infty})$. Now, the function *τ* is strictly negative on $(0,+\mathrm{\infty})$ since $\tau (0)=\tau ({0}^{+})=0$ and ${\tau}^{\prime}(\u03f5)=z(1-z){e}^{-z\u03f5}({e}^{\u03f5}-1)<0$ for $\u03f5>0$.

Moreover, ${lim}_{\u03f5\to {0}^{+}}{\mathcal{R}}_{z}(\u03f5)=z$ for each $z>1$; in consequence, ${sup}_{\u03f5>0}{\mathcal{R}}_{z}(\u03f5)=z$ for every $z>1$. Therefore, if $\gamma (z)\ge z$ for every $z>1$, then (7) follows. Note also that if $q\in (0,1)$, then $\gamma ({q}^{-1/2})>0$. Finally, for $q\in (0,1)$, if we take $\gamma :(1,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ such that $\gamma (z)=z$ for $z>1$, we deduce the validity of (7), (8) and (9).

The following example shows that Theorem 9 is a proper generalization of the fixed point results in [7–10].

**Example 18**Let $X={\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ be endowed with the Euclidean metric, let $f:X\to X$ and $T:X\to CB(X)$ be defined by $fx=4({x}^{2}+x)$ and $Tx=[0,{x}^{2}+7]$. Let $\varphi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ be defined by $\varphi (t)=\frac{1}{4}t$ for all $t\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$. Then mappings

*f*and

*T*are not commuting and also do not satisfy any of its generalizations, viz weakly commuting, compatibility, weak compatibility. Also the mappings

*f*and

*T*are not coincidentally commuting. Note that $f1\in T1$, but $ff1\ne f1$ and so

*f*and

*T*are not coincidentally idempotent, but $f0\in T0$ and $ff0=f0$ thus

*f*and

*T*are occasionally coincidentally idempotent. For all

*x*and

*y*in

*X*, we have

which is satisfied taking, for instance, the constant function $\psi \equiv 1$. On the other hand, *γ* is chosen as the identity map and it satisfies (8) and (9).

Note that 0 is a common fixed point of *f* and *T*. We remark that the results of [7–9] and [10] cannot be applied to these mappings *f* and *T*.

**Theorem 19**

*In Theorem*9,

*we can assume*,

*instead of condition*(2),

*one of the inequalities*

*or*

*where* $a,b\ge 0$, $a+b\le 1$ *and* $q\in (0,1)$.

*Similarly*,

*in Corollary*10,

*we can consider one of the contractivity conditions*

*or*

*where* $a,b\ge 0$, $a+b\le 1$ *and* $\varphi \in \mathrm{\Phi}$ (*satisfying* (11) *for a certain* $q\in (0,1)$) *and the conclusion follows*.

*Proof*It follows from the inequality

*a*,

*b*and

*ψ*. Indeed, ${d}^{2}(fx,fy)\le {[L(x,y)]}^{2}$,

Note that, in cases (16) and (17), it is not necessary to assume the nondecreasing character of the function *ϕ* since, using that $\varphi \in \mathrm{\Phi}$, we deduce (14) and (15), respectively. □

Of course, the function $\varphi \equiv 0$ is admissible in the results of this paper.

Note that, taking $a=1$ and $b=0$ in the inequalities of Theorem 19, we obtain the corresponding contractivity conditions of Theorem 9 and Corollary 10. On the other hand, taking $a=0$ and $b=1$ in Theorem 19, we have the following results, which are also corollaries of Theorem 9.

**Corollary 20**

*Let Y be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that conditions*(1), (3)

*hold and*

*where* $0<q<1$ *and* $\psi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ *is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is nonnegative*, *summable on each compact interval and such that* (4) *holds*. *Assume also that* (7), (8) *and* (9) *are fulfilled for a certain* $\gamma :(1,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}_{+}$. *Then* *f* *and* *T* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if * *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

**Corollary 21**

*Let Y be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that conditions*(1), (3)

*hold and*

*where* $\varphi \in \mathrm{\Phi}$ (*satisfying* (11) *for* $q\in (0,1)$) *and* $\psi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ *is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is nonnegative*, *summable on each compact interval and such that* (4) *holds*. *Assume also that* (7), (8) *and* (9) *are fulfilled for a certain* $\gamma :(1,+\mathrm{\infty})\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}_{+}$. *Then* *f* *and* *T* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if * *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

Let $\eta :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1)$ be a function having the following property (see, for instance, [6, 25]):

($\mathcal{P}$) For $t\ge 0$, there exist $\delta (t)>0$, $s(t)<1$ such that $0\le r-t<\delta (t)$ implies $\eta (r)\le s(t)$.

This property obviously holds if *η* is continuous since *η* attains its maximum (less than 1) on each compact $[t,t+\delta (t)]$.

**Definition 22** A sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is said to be asymptotically *T*-regular with respect to *f* if ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})=0$.

The following theorem is related to the main results of Hu [[25], Theorem 2], Jungck [14], Kaneko [26], Nadler [[24], Theorem 5] and Beg and Azam [[6], Theorem 5.4 and Corollary 5.5].

**Theorem 23**

*Let*

*Y*

*be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CL(X)$

*be such that condition*(1)

*holds and*

*for all* $x,y\in Y$, *where* $\eta :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1)$ *satisfies* ($\mathcal{P}$) *and* $\psi \ge 0$ *is nonincreasing*.

*Suppose also that* *Tx* *is a compact set for every* $x\in Y$.

*If*$f(Y)$

*is complete*,

*then*

- (i)
*there exists an asymptotically**T*-*regular sequence*$\{{x}_{n}\}$*with respect to**f**in**Y*, - (ii)
*f**and**T**have a coincidence point*.

*Further*, *if * *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

*Proof*For some ${x}_{0}$ in

*Y*, let ${y}_{0}=f{x}_{0}$ and choose ${x}_{1}$ in

*Y*such that ${y}_{1}=f{x}_{1}\in T{x}_{0}$. Then, by (20), we have

Note that, in the previous inequalities, we have used that $d(f{x}_{0},f{x}_{1})>0$. If $d(f{x}_{0},f{x}_{1})=0$, then $f{x}_{0}=f{x}_{1}\in T{x}_{0}$ and $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is asymptotically *T*-regular with respect to *f*.

*Y*and $\{{y}_{n}\}$ in $f(Y)$ such that, for every

*n*,

and ${y}_{n}=f{x}_{n}\in T{x}_{n-1}$.

*t*. Clearly $t\ge 0$. If $t>0$, then by the property ($\mathcal{P}$) of

*η*, there will exist $\delta (t)>0$ and $s(t)<1$ such that

which contradicts the assumption that $t>0$. Thus ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({y}_{n},{y}_{n+1})=0$; *i.e.*, $d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})\to 0$ as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$. Hence the sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is asymptotically *T*-regular with respect to *f*.

*ψ*, we get

*n*, which implies that

We check that the right-hand side in the last inequality tends to 0 as $n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}$. Since ${\int}_{0}^{d({y}_{n},{y}_{n+1})}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt\to 0$ as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$, it suffices to show that ${\sum}_{i=n+1}^{m-1}{\prod}_{l=n}^{i-1}\eta (d({y}_{l},{y}_{l+1}))$ is bounded (uniformly on *n*, *m*). Indeed, we check that ${\sum}_{i=n+1}^{m-1}{\prod}_{l=n}^{i-1}\eta ({z}_{l})$ is bounded for any sequence $\{{z}_{l}\}$ with nonnegative terms and tending to 0 as $l\to +\mathrm{\infty}$, using the property ($\mathcal{P}$) of the function *η*. Given $t=0$, by ($\mathcal{P}$), there exist $\delta (0)>0$, ${s}_{0}<1$ such that $0\le r<\delta (0)$ implies $\eta (r)\le {s}_{0}$. Since $\{{z}_{l}\}\to 0$, given $\delta (0)>0$, there exists ${l}_{0}\in \mathbb{N}$ such that, for every $l\ge {l}_{0}$, we have $0\le {z}_{l}<\delta (0)$. This implies that $\eta ({z}_{l})\le {s}_{0}$ for every $l\ge {l}_{0}$.

and this expression is bounded independently of *m*, *n*.

*p*in $f(Y)$. Let $z\in {f}^{-1}(p)$. Then $fz=p$. Next, we have

Letting $n\to \mathrm{\infty}$, we get ${\int}_{0}^{d(fz,Tz)}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt\le 0$. Thus we have $d(fz,Tz)=0$. Hence $fz\in Tz$.

*f*and

*T*are occasionally coincidentally idempotent, then $ffw=fw$ for some $w\in C(T,f)$. Then we have

Thus, $Tfw=Tw$. It follows that $ffw=fw\in Tw=Tfw$. Hence, *fw* is a common fixed point of *T* and *f*. □

Now we state some fixed point theorems for Kannan-type multi-valued mappings which extend and generalize the corresponding results of Shiau *et al.* [10] and Beg and Azam [6, 27]. A proper blend of the proof of Theorem 9 and those of [[10], Th. 6, Th. 7, Th. 8 respectively] and [[9], Theorems 3.1, 3.2, 3.3] will complete the proof.

**Theorem 24**

*Let*

*Y*

*be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that*(1)

*holds and*

*for all*$x,y\in Y$,

*where*${\alpha}_{i}:{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to [0,1)$ ($i=1,2$)

*are bounded on bounded sets*,

*r*

*is some fixed positive real number and*$\psi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$

*is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is summable on each compact interval and*${\int}_{0}^{\u03f5}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt>0$

*for each*$\u03f5>0$.

*Suppose that there exists an asymptotically*

*T*-

*regular sequence*$\{{x}_{n}\}$

*with respect to*

*f*

*in*

*Y*.

*If*$T(Y)$

*is complete or*

*then* *f* *and* *T* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if* *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

*Proof*By hypotheses,

Since $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is asymptotically *T*-regular with respect to *f* in *Y*, then ${\{{\alpha}_{1}(d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n}))\}}_{n}$ and ${\{{\alpha}_{2}(d(f{x}_{m},T{x}_{m}))\}}_{m}$ are bounded sequences and ${\int}_{0}^{{d}^{r}(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt\to 0$, ${\int}_{0}^{{d}^{r}(f{x}_{m},T{x}_{m})}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt\to 0$, as $n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}$. This provides the property $H(T{x}_{n},T{x}_{m})\to 0$ as $n,m\to +\mathrm{\infty}$, so that $\{T{x}_{n}\}$ is a Cauchy sequence in $(CB(X),H)$.

*r*, and therefore fixed. Calculating the limit as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$ and taking into account that the length of the intervals in the last integral tends to zero, we get

and, by the properties of *ψ*, we get ${d}^{r}(fu,Tu)=0$, which implies that $fu\in Tu$ and *u* is a coincidence point.

Now, suppose that $f(Y)$ is complete. Note that $T{x}_{n}$ is closed and bounded for every $n\in \mathbb{N}$. Take $k>1$ fixed. By the results in [24], we can affirm that for every ${y}_{1}\in T{x}_{n}$, there exists ${y}_{2}\in T{x}_{m}$ such that $d({y}_{1},{y}_{2})\le kH(T{x}_{n},T{x}_{m})$.

*n*, hence

*f*and

*T*are coincidentally idempotent, then $ffw=fw$ for some $w\in C(T,f)$. Hence

obtaining $d(fw,Tfw)=0$ and $fw\in Tfw$. Since $0\le {\int}_{0}^{{H}^{r}(Tfw,Tw)}\psi (t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dt\le 0$, we deduce that $H(Tfw,Tw)=0$ and $Tfw=Tw$. In consequence, $ffw=fw\in Tw=Tfw$ and *fw* is a common fixed point of *T* and *f*. □

**Remark 25**In the statement of Theorem 24, condition (22) can be replaced by the more general one

To complete the proof with this more general hypothesis, take into account that for $y\in Y$, $T(y)$ is a closed set in *X* and $T(Y)\subseteq f(Y)$. Using that $f(Y)$ is complete, we deduce that $(CL(f(Y)),H)$ is complete. Hence $\{T{x}_{n}\}$ is a sequence in $CL(f(Y))$ and it is a Cauchy sequence in $(CL(f(Y)),H)$. Therefore, there exists ${K}^{\ast}\in CL(f(Y))$ such that $H(T{x}_{n},{K}^{\ast})\to 0$ as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$. Note also that ${K}^{\ast}$ is a closed set in the complete space $f(Y)$, then ${K}^{\ast}$ is complete and, therefore, a closed set, then ${K}^{\ast}\in CL(X)$. Once we have proved that $H(T{x}_{n},{K}^{\ast})\to 0$ as $n\to +\mathrm{\infty}$ in $(CL(f(Y)),H)$, the proof follows analogously.

**Theorem 26** *In addition to the hypotheses of Theorem * 24, *suppose that* $T{x}_{n}$ *is compact for all* $n\in \mathbb{N}$. *If* $f(z)$ *is a cluster point of* $\{f{x}_{n}\}$, *then* *z* *is a coincidence point of* *f* *and* *T*.

*Proof*Let ${y}_{n}\in T{x}_{n}$ be such that $d(f{x}_{n},{y}_{n})=d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})\to 0$, this is possible since $T{x}_{n}$ is compact. It is obvious that a cluster point of $\{f{x}_{n}\}$ is a cluster point of $\{{y}_{n}\}$. Let $f(z)$ be a cluster point of $\{f{x}_{n}\}$ and $\{{y}_{n}\}$, then we check that $fz\in Tu$, where

*u*is obtained in the proof of Theorem 24. Note that, for every $y\in Tu$,

*fz*, the properties of $\{{x}_{n}\}$ and the inequality

and, by the properties of ${\alpha}_{2}$ and *ψ*, we deduce that $d(fz,Tz)=0$, which proves that *z* is a coincidence point of *f* and *T*. □

The following result extends [[10], Theorem 3.3].

**Theorem 27**

*Let*

*Y*

*be an arbitrary non*-

*empty set*, $(X,d)$

*be a metric space*, $f:Y\to X$

*and*$T:Y\to CB(X)$

*be such that*(1)

*and*(21)

*hold*,

*where*${\alpha}_{i}:{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to [0,1)$ ($i=1,2$)

*are bounded on bounded sets and such that*

*r*

*is some fixed positive real number and*$\psi :{\mathbb{R}}_{+}\to {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$

*is a Lebesgue measurable mapping which is summable on each compact interval*,

*and*$\psi (x)>0$

*for each*$x>0$.

*Suppose that*

*If* $T(Y)$ *is complete or* $f(Y)$ *is complete*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a coincidence point*. *Further*, *if* *f* *and* *T* *are occasionally coincidentally idempotent*, *then* *f* *and* *T* *have a common fixed point*.

*Proof*Using Theorem 24, it suffices to prove that there exists an asymptotically

*T*-regular sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ with respect to

*f*in

*Y*. Let ${x}_{0}\in Y$ and take $\{{x}_{n}\}$ in

*Y*such that $f{x}_{n}\in T{x}_{n-1}$ for every $n\in \mathbb{N}$. Then

*ψ*imply that ${d}^{r}(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})\le {d}^{r}(f{x}_{n-1},T{x}_{n-1})$ for every $n\in \mathbb{N}$, and ${\{d(f{x}_{n},T{x}_{n})\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ is nonincreasing and bounded below. Therefore it is convergent to the infimum, that is,

and $\{{x}_{n}\}$ is asymptotically *T*-regular with respect to *f* in *Y*. □

**Remark 28**Note that condition (23) in Theorem 27 cannot be replaced by

since the infimum taking the sequence $\{{z}_{n}\}$ could be positive (we calculate the infimum in a smaller set).

**Remark 29**In Theorem 27, condition (23) can be replaced by the following:

and $d(f{z}_{n},T{z}_{n})\to 0$.

**Remark 30**In Theorem 27, if we are able to obtain a sequence $\{{x}_{n}\}$ with an infinite number of terms which are different, then we can relax condition (23) to the following:

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Jean Mawhin, on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.

We thank the editor, the anonymous referees and also Professor Stojan Radenović for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was partially supported by the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, project MTM2010-15314, and co-financed by EC fund FEDER.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Shiau C, Tan KK, Wong CS: A class of quasi-nonexpansive multi-valued maps.
*Can. Math. Bull.*1975, 18: 707–714.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Rus IA:
*Generalized Contractions and Applications*. Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca; 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kikkawa M, Suzuki T: Three fixed point theorems for generalized contractions with constants in complete metric spaces.
*Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl.*2008, 69(9):2942–2949. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.064MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dhompongsa S, Yingtaweesittikul H: Fixed points for multivalued mappings and the metric completeness.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2009., 2009: Article ID 972395Google Scholar - Moţ G, Petruşel A: Fixed point theory for a new type of contractive multivalued operators.
*Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl.*2009, 70(9):3371–3377. 10.1016/j.na.2008.05.005View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Beg I, Azam A: Fixed points of asymptotically regular multivalued mappings.
*J. Aust. Math. Soc. A*1992, 53: 313–326. 10.1017/S1446788700036491MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Naimpally S, Singh S, Whitefield JHM: Coincidence theorems for hybrid contractions.
*Math. Nachr.*1986, 127: 177–180. 10.1002/mana.19861270112MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Pathak HK: Fixed point theorems for weak compatible multi-valued and single valued mappings.
*Acta Math. Hung.*1995, 67(1–2):69–78. 10.1007/BF01874520View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Pathak HK, Kang SM, Cho YJ: Coincidence and fixed point theorems for nonlinear hybrid generalized contractions.
*Czechoslov. Math. J.*1998, 48(123):341–357.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Pathak HK, Khan MS: Fixed and coincidence points of hybrid mappings.
*Arch. Math.*2002, 38: 201–208.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Singh SL, Mishra SN: Coincidences and fixed points of nonself hybrid contractions.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2001, 256(2):486–497. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7301MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Singh SL, Mishra SN: Coincidence theorems for certain classes of hybrid contractions.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2010., 2010: Article ID 898109Google Scholar - Jungck G: Commuting mappings and fixed points.
*Am. Math. Mon.*1976, 83: 261–263. 10.2307/2318216MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Kaneko H: Single-valued and multi-valued
*f*-contractions.*Boll. Unione Mat. Ital.*1985, 4-A: 29–33.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kaneko H: A common fixed point of weakly commuting multi-valued mappings.
*Math. Jpn.*1988, 33(5):741–744.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Singh SL, Ha KS, Cho YJ: Coincidence and fixed points of nonlinear hybrid contractions.
*Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.*1989, 12(2):247–256. 10.1155/S0161171289000281MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Jungck G, Rhoades BE: Fixed points theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings.
*Fixed Point Theory*2006, 7(2):287–296.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Jungck G, Rhoades BE: Fixed points theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings, Erratum.
*Fixed Point Theory*2008, 9: 286–296.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Vetro C: On Branciari’s theorem for weakly compatible mappings.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2010, 23: 700–705. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.02.011MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Vijayaraju P, Rhoades BE, Mohanraj R: A fixed point theorem for a pair of maps satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type.
*Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.*2005, 15: 2359–2364.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Abbas M, Rhoades BE: Common fixed point theorems for hybrid pairs of occasionally weakly compatible mappings satisfying generalized contractive condition of integral type.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2007., 2007: Article ID 54101Google Scholar - Abbas M, Khan AR: Common fixed points of generalized contractive hybrid pairs in symmetric spaces.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2009., 2009: Article ID 869407Google Scholar - Kadelburg Z, Radenović S, Rakočević V: Topological vector spaces valued cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl.*2010., 2010: Article ID 170253Google Scholar - Nadler S: Multi-valued contraction mappings.
*Pac. J. Math.*1969, 20: 475–488.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Hu T: Fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings.
*Can. Math. Bull.*1980, 23: 193–197. 10.4153/CMB-1980-026-2View ArticleMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kubiak T: Fixed point theorems for contractive type multi-valued mappings.
*Math. Jpn.*1985, 30: 89–101.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Beg I, Azam A: Fixed point theorems for Kannan mappings.
*Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.*1986, 17(11):1270–1275.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.