- Research
- Open Access

# A note on blow-up of solutions for the nonlocal quasilinear parabolic equation with positive initial energy

- Zhong Bo Fang
^{1}Email author, - Lu Sun
^{1}and - Changjun Li
^{1}

**2013**:181

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-181

© Fang et al.; licensee Springer 2013

**Received:**2 March 2013**Accepted:**23 July 2013**Published:**8 August 2013

## Abstract

In this short note, we consider a nonlocal quasilinear parabolic equation in a bounded domain with the Neumann-Robin boundary condition. We establish a blow-up result for a certain solution with positive initial energy.

## Keywords

- Weak Solution
- Parabolic Equation
- Initial Energy
- Initial Boundary
- Homogeneous Dirichlet Boundary Condition

## 1 Introduction

where $\mathrm{\Omega}\subset {\mathbf{R}}^{N}$ ($N\ge 1$) is a bounded domain with a smooth boundary, $m(\mathrm{\Omega})$ denotes the Lebesgue measure of the domain Ω, ${\mathrm{\Delta}}_{p}u=div({|\mathrm{\nabla}u|}^{p-2}\mathrm{\nabla}u)$ with $p\ge 2$, $q>p-1$, ${u}_{0}(x)\in {L}^{\mathrm{\infty}}(\mathrm{\Omega})\cap {W}^{1,p}(\mathrm{\Omega})$, ${u}_{0}(x)\not\equiv 0$, and ${\int}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{u}_{0}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dx=0$. It is easy to check that the integral of *u* over Ω is conserved. Meanwhile, since $u(x,t)$ is not required to be nonnegative, we use ${|u|}^{q-1}u$ instead of ${u}^{q}$ in equation (1.1).

*x*and time

*t*, respectively. The arising of a nonlocal term denotes the evolution of the species at a point of space, which depends not only on nearby density, but also on the mean value of the total amount of species due to the effects of spatial inhomogeneity, see [1–3]. This equation can be also used to describe the slow diffusion of concentration of non-Newton flow in a porous medium or the temperature of some combustible substance (

*cf.*[4–6]). In addition, when $p=q=2$ in (1.1), equation (1.1) becomes

which is one of the simplest equations with nonlocal terms and a homogeneous Neumann boundary condition, and the quantity ${\int}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}u(x,t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dx$ is conserved. This equation is also related to the Navier-Stokes equation on an infinite slab, which is explained in [7].

*p*-Laplacian equation

with the Neumann-Robin boundary condition (1.2), and established a relation between the finite time blow-up solutions and the negative initial energy, when $p\ge 2$ and *f* belongs to a large class of nonlinearities by virtue of a convexity argument.

In those works mentioned above, most problems assumed that the initial energy was negative or non-positive to ensure the occurrence of blow-up. But, to the best of our knowledge, the positive initial energy can also ensure the occurrence of blow-up in local or nonlocal problems. It is difficult to determine whether the solutions of the initial boundary value problem of nonlocal equation (1.1) will blow up in finite time, since the comparison principle, which is the most effective tool to show blow-up of solutions, is invalid. The aim of our work is to find a relation between the finite time blow-up of solutions and the positive initial energy of problem (1.1)-(1.3) by the improved convexity method.

## 2 Preliminaries and the main result

Since $p>2$, equation (1.1) is degenerate on $\{(x,t)|\mathrm{\nabla}u=0\}$, there is no classical solution in general. Hence, it is reasonable to find a weak solution of problem (1.1)-(1.3). To this end, we first give the following definition of the weak solution of problem (1.1)-(1.3).

**Definition 1**If a function $u(x,t)$ satisfies the following conditions:

where $\varphi \in {C}^{1}(\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}\times [0,T])$ and ${Q}_{T}=\mathrm{\Omega}\times (0,T)$, then $u(x,t)$ is called a weak solution of problem (1.1)-(1.3).

**Remark 1** The existence of local nonnegative solutions in time to problem (1.1)-(1.3) can be obtained by using a fixed point theorem or a parabolic regular theory to get a suitable estimate in a standard limiting process, see [6, 15, 16]. The proof is standard, and so it is omitted here. Moreover, for convenience, we may assume that the appropriate weak solution is smooth, and no longer consider approximation problem.

*u*in $W(\mathrm{\Omega})$ satisfy ${\int}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}u\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dx=0$. We also define a norm on $W(\mathrm{\Omega})$ by

*B*be the optimal constant of the embedding inequality

We now introduce our main result on the blow-up solutions with the positive initial energy below.

**Theorem 1** (Sufficient condition for blow-up)

*Set* $p\ge 2$, $p-1<q\le +\mathrm{\infty}$, *when* $N\le p$ *and* $p-1<q\le \frac{(p-1)N+p}{N-p}$, *when* $N>p$. *Suppose that* $u(\cdot ,t)\in W(\mathrm{\Omega})$ *is a solution of* (1.1)-(1.3), *and the initial datum* ${u}_{0}(x)\in W(\mathrm{\Omega})$ *is chosen to ensure that* $E(0)<{E}_{1}$ *and* ${\parallel \mathrm{\nabla}{u}_{0}\parallel}_{p}>{\alpha}_{1}$. *Then the solution* $u(x,t)$ *blows up in a finite time*.

**Remark 2** Choose $\mathrm{\Omega}=(-\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2})$, $p=3$ and $q=3$; one can easily verify that ${u}_{0}(x)=sinx$ satisfies ${u}_{0}(x)\in W(\mathrm{\Omega})$, $E(0)<{E}_{1}$ and ${\parallel \mathrm{\nabla}{u}_{0}\parallel}_{p}>{\alpha}_{1}$, therefore, conditions in Theorem 1 are valid.

**Remark 3** Our result improves the results of Gao [11] and Niculescu and Rovenţa [14].

## 3 The proof of Theorem 1

To prove our main result, we first establish the following three lemmas obtained by applying the idea of Liu and Wang in [13], where a different type of problem was discussed.

**Lemma 1** $E(t)$ *defined in* (2.3) *is non*-*increasing in* *t*.

*Proof*A direct computation with the integration by parts yields

and hence, $E(t)$ is non-increasing in *t*. □

The following second lemma gives a lower bound estimate for the solution $u(x,t)$ in the ${L}^{p}$-norm:

**Lemma 2**

*Let*$u(x,t)$

*be a solution of*(1.1)-(1.3)

*with initial data satisfying*

*Then there exists a positive constant*${\alpha}_{2}>{\alpha}_{1}$

*such that*

*and*

*Proof*By (2.1) and (2.3), we notice that

where $\alpha ={\parallel \mathrm{\nabla}u\parallel}_{p}$. It can be easily seen that *g* is increasing for $0<\alpha <{\alpha}_{1}$, and decreasing for $\alpha >{\alpha}_{1}$, $g(\alpha )\to -\mathrm{\infty}$ as $\alpha \to +\mathrm{\infty}$, and $g({\alpha}_{1})={E}_{1}$, where ${\alpha}_{1}$ and ${E}_{1}$ are constants defined in (2.2). Therefore, there exists a constant ${\alpha}_{2}>{\alpha}_{1}$ such that $E(0)=g({\alpha}_{2})$, since $E(0)<{E}_{1}$.

Setting ${\alpha}_{0}={\parallel \mathrm{\nabla}{u}_{0}\parallel}_{p}$, we have $g({\alpha}_{0})\le E(0)=g({\alpha}_{2})$ by (3.3), which implies that ${\alpha}_{0}\ge {\alpha}_{2}$, since ${\alpha}_{0}$ and ${\alpha}_{2}\ge {\alpha}_{1}$.

which is impossible by Lemma 1, and hence, inequality (3.1) is established.

from which inequality (3.2) follows. □

we have the following lemma.

**Lemma 3**

*For all*$t\ge 0$,

*we have the inequalities*

*Proof*By Lemma 1, we have

which guarantees (3.5). □

*Proof of Theorem 1*Setting $G(t)=\frac{1}{2}{\int}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}{u}^{2}(x,t)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}dx$ and differentiating it, we obtain that

where ${C}_{0}=(1-\frac{{\alpha}_{1}^{q+1}}{{\alpha}_{2}^{q+1}})\frac{q-p+1}{q+1}$.

which implies that $G(t)$ blows up at a finite time ${T}^{\ast}\le \frac{{G}^{\frac{1-q}{2}}(0)}{\frac{q-1}{2}\gamma}$, and so does $u(x,t)$. The proof is completed. □

**Remark 4** Due to the restriction of our method, we cannot get the blow-up result for $q>\frac{(p-1)N+p}{N-p}$, when $N>p$. We conjecture that Theorem 1 will hold for all $q>p-1\ge 1$.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2012AM018). The authors would like to deeply thank all the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Furter J, Grinfield M: Local vs. non-local interactions in populations dynamics.
*J. Math. Biol.*1989, 27: 65-80. 10.1007/BF00276081MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Calsina A, Perello C, Saldana J: Non-local reaction-diffusion equations modelling predator-prey coevolution.
*Publ. Mat.*1994, 38: 315-325.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Allegretto W, Fragnelli G, Nistri P,
*et al*.: Coexistence and optimal control problems for a degenerate predator-prey model.*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2011, 378: 528-540. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.12.036MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bebernes J, Eberly D:
*Mathematical Problems from Combustion Theory*. Springer, New York; 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pao CV:
*Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations*. Plenum, New York; 1992.Google Scholar - Wu ZQ, Zhao JN, Yin JX,
*et al*.:*Nonlinear Diffusion Equations*. World Scientific, Singapore; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Budd CJ, Dold JW, Stuart AM: Blow-up in a system of partial differential equations with conserved first integral. Part II: problems with convection.
*SIAM J. Appl. Math.*1994, 54(3):610-640. 10.1137/S0036139992232131MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hu B, Yin HM: Semi-linear parabolic equations with prescribed energy.
*Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo*1995, 44: 479-505. 10.1007/BF02844682MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - El Soufi A, Jazar M, Monneau R: A gamma-convergence argument for the blow-up of a non-local semilinear parabolic equation with Neumann boundary conditions.
*Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire*1995, 24(1):17-39.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jazar M, Kiwan R: Blow-up of a non-local semilinear parabolic equation with Neumann boundary conditions.
*Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire*2008, 25: 215-218. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2006.12.002MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gao WJ, Han YZ: Blow-up of a nonlocal semilinear parabolic equation with positive initial energy.
*Appl. Math. Lett.*2011, 24(5):784-788. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.12.040MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Niculescu CP, Rovenţa J: Large solutions for semilinear parabolic equations involving some special classes of nonlinearities.
*Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc.*2010., 2010: Article ID 491023Google Scholar - Liu WJ, Wang MX: Blow-up of the solution for a
*p*-Laplacian equation with positive initial energy.*Acta Appl. Math.*2008, 103: 141-146. 10.1007/s10440-008-9225-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Niculescu CP, Rovenţa J: Generalized convexity and the existence of finite time blow-up solutions for an evolutionary problem.
*Nonlinear Anal. TMA*2012, 75: 270-277. 10.1016/j.na.2011.08.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhao JN:Existence and nonexistence of solutions for ${u}_{t}=div({|\mathrm{\nabla}u|}^{p-2}\mathrm{\nabla}u)+f(\mathrm{\nabla}u,u,x,t)$.
*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1993, 172: 130-146. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1012MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li FC, Xie CH: Global and blow-up solutions to a
*p*-Laplace equation with nonlocal source.*Comput. Math. Appl.*2003, 46: 1525-1533. 10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90188-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.