- Open Access
A new approach to BVPs with state-dependent impulses
Boundary Value Problems volume 2013, Article number: 22 (2013)
The paper deals with the second-order Dirichlet boundary value problem with one state-dependent impulse
Proofs of the main results contain a new approach to boundary value problems with state-dependent impulses which is based on a transformation to a fixed point problem of an appropriate operator in the space . Sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to the problem are given here. The presented approach can be extended to more impulses and to other boundary conditions.
Most papers in the literature on impulsive boundary value problems concern the case with fixed moments of impulsive effects. Papers dealing with state-dependent impulses, called also impulses at variable times, focus their attention on initial value problems or periodic problems. Such papers investigate the existence, stability or asymptotic properties of solutions of initial value problems [4–8] or solvability of autonomous periodic problems [9, 10] and nonautonomous ones [11–15]. We can also find papers investigating other boundary value problems with state-dependent impulses through some initial value problems for multi-valued maps [16, 17].
In this paper we provide a new approach to boundary value problems with state-dependent impulses based on a construction of proper sets and operators and the topological degree arguments. Unlike previous existing results, our approach enables us to find simple existence conditions for data functions and it can be used for other regular (and also singular) problems. We demonstrate it on the second-order Dirichlet boundary value problem with one state-dependent impulse
where we assume
Under assumptions (4)-(8), we prove the solvability of problem (1)-(3). In particular, we transform problem (1)-(3) to a fixed point problem for a proper operator in the space . This approach can be also used for other types of boundary conditions and it can be easily extended to more impulses.
Here, we denote by the set of all continuous functions on the interval J, by the set of all functions having continuous derivatives on the interval J and by the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on J. For a compact interval J, we consider the linear space of functions from or equipped, respectively, with the norms
In this paper we work with the linear space , where , equipped with the norm
It is well-known that the mentioned normed spaces are Banach spaces. Recall that for , a function satisfies the Carathéodory conditions on (we write ) if
is measurable for all ,
is continuous for a.e. ,
for each compact set , there exists a function such that for a.e. and each .
We say that is a solution of problem (1)-(3), if z is continuous on , there exists unique such that , and have absolutely continuous first derivatives, z satisfies equation (1) for a.e. and fulfills conditions (2), (3).
In this section we assume that (4)-(8) are fulfilled. We introduce sets and operators corresponding to problem (1)-(3) and prove their properties which are needed for an application of the Leray-Schauder degree theory. Let us consider K of (7) and define the set
Lemma 1 For each , there exists a unique such that
Proof Let us take an arbitrary . Obviously, the constant is a solution of the equation
i.e., is a root of the function
From (8) it follows , . According to (8) and the definition of , we get
Therefore, σ is strictly decreasing on and hence it has exactly one root in . □
Now, define a functional by
where fulfills (9). The next lemma provides an important result about the continuity of which is fundamental for our approach.
Lemma 2 The functional is continuous on .
Proof Let us consider , for such that in . Let us denote
By Lemma 1, and , where and , respectively. According to (8), we get , for and
We will prove that . Let us take an arbitrary . Since and (cf. (10)), we can find and such that
From (11) it follows the existence of such that
for each . By Lemma 1 and the continuity of , it follows that for . □
Further, consider of (8) and define sets and Ω by
Finally, define an operator by , where
for , ,
and G is the Green function of the problem , , that is,
Lemma 3 The operator ℱ is compact on .
Proof First, we will prove the continuity of the operator ℱ. Let us choose , for such that
Let us denote , , , for each . We will prove that in . For each , we get by (13)-(15)
By (16), there exists a compact set such that , for each and . Consequently, by (4), there exists such that
for a.e. and all . Since
for a.e. , then due to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, it follows that
as . Since , the absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral yields
Further, we have for the inequality
for each and the same is true for . The continuity of , and I imply that
as uniformly w.r.t. . Therefore, converges to x in . Similar arguments can be applied to the sequence .
Now we will prove that is relatively compact. The boundedness of implies the existence of and such that for all ,
Therefore, by (13), we get
We have proved that the set is bounded in . We now show that the set is equicontinuous on . For a.e. and all , we have
As a result, for each , there exists such that for each satisfying , the inequality
holds for all . Consequently, is relatively compact in by the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem. □
Lemma 4 Let be a fixed point of ℱ. Then the function
is a solution of problem (1)-(3).
Proof Let be such that , that is,
Let us consider the function z defined in (17). Hence, , ,
and by Lemma 1,
In addition, by (17), is a unique point in satisfying (20). Put , . Due to (19) and (20), we get . Further,
Therefore, σ is strictly decreasing on , which yields for . Consequently, is a unique point in satisfying (20).
Further, we get
, and by virtue of (14),
3 Main result
Here, using the Leray-Schauder degree theory, we prove our main result about the solvability of problem (1)-(3). To this end, we will need the following lemma on a priori estimates.
Lemma 5 Assume (4)-(8). Then for any and any solution of the equation
Proof Let us choose and let satisfy (21), i.e.,
for . Then
. Since , it follows that and therefore , , and . There are two possibilities as follows.
Case A. Let . Then and from (15) and (24), it follows
which implies, due to (6) and (8),
Then , which yields .
Case B. Let . From (24), (14), (6), (5) and (8), it follows
This inequality together with (7) implies
which is a contradiction.
For , the solution of (21) is , and it clearly belongs to Ω. □
Theorem 6 Assume (4)-(8). Then the operator ℱ has a fixed point in Ω.
Proof According to Lemma 5, the operator is a homotopy. Therefore,
and consequently the equation
has a solution in Ω. This solution is a fixed point of the operator ℱ. □
Theorem 7 Assume (4)-(8). Then problem (1)-(3) has a solution z such that
Proof From Theorem 6 it follows that there exists a fixed point of the operator ℱ. Lemma 4 yields that the function z defined in (17) (with ) is a solution of problem (1)-(3). Estimates (25) follow from (17) and from the definitions of Ω and (cf. (12) and (8)). □
Remark 8 Let us note that assumption (7) follows from the condition
In this section we demonstrate that Theorem 7 can be applied to sublinear, linear and superlinear problems.
Example 9 (Sublinear problem)
Let us consider problem (1)-(3) with
that is, f and I are sublinear in x. Then assumptions (5) and (6) are valid for
Remark 8 yields that condition (7) is satisfied for any sufficiently large K. In particular, let us put
If we choose , we see that (7) holds. Then by (8), we have
For instance, if we choose and put
or if we choose , and put
we can check that conditions (8) are satisfied in both cases. Therefore, by Theorem 7, the corresponding problem (1)-(3) has at least one solution.
Note that (27) shows that γ need not be monotonous.
Example 10 (Linear problem)
Let us consider problem (1)-(3) with f and I having the linear behavior in x and put
Then assumptions (5) and (6) are valid for
Theorem 7 can be applied, due to Remark 8, under the additional assumption
If (28) holds, then for any sufficiently large K, condition (7) is satisfied. By (8), we have , and problem (1)-(3) has a solution for any γ satisfying (8). Consequently, if γ is given by (26) or (27), problem (1)-(3) is solvable.
Example 11 (Superlinear problem) Let us consider problem (1)-(3) with f and I superlinear in x. Put, for example,
Then assumptions (5) and (6) are valid for
By virtue of (7), Theorem 7 can be applied provided there exists such that
Let us search K in the interval . Then and it holds
Consequently, each fulfilling the equation
satisfies (30) as well. Put, for example, , . Then we get that for inequality (30) holds. Consequently, (8) gives and the corresponding problem (1)-(3) is solvable for any γ satisfying (8). In particular, γ given by (26) or (27) can be considered in this case as well.
Bainov D, Simeonov P Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics 66. In Impulsive Differential Equations: Periodic Solutions and Applications. Longman, Essex; 1993.
Lakshmikantham V, Bainov DD, Simeonov PS: Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1989.
Samoilenko AM, Perestyuk NA: Impulsive Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore; 1995.
Afonso SM, Bonotto EM, Federson M, Schwabik Š: Discontinuous local semiflows for Kurzweil equations leading to LaSalle’s invariance principle for differential systems with impulses at variable times. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 250: 2969-3001. 10.1016/j.jde.2011.01.019
Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: Impulsive functional differential equations with variable times. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47: 1659-1665. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.013
Domoshnitsky A, Drakhlin M, Litsyn E: Nonoscillation and positivity of solutions to first order state-dependent differential equations with impulses in variable moments. J. Differ. Equ. 2006, 228: 39-48. 10.1016/j.jde.2006.05.009
Frigon M, O’Regan D: Impulsive differential equations with variable times. Nonlinear Anal. 1996, 26: 1913-1922. 10.1016/0362-546X(95)00053-X
Kaul S, Lakshmikantham V, Leela S: Extremal solutions, comparison principle and stability criteria for impulsive differential equations with variable times. Nonlinear Anal. 1994, 22: 1263-1270. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)90109-0
Liu L, Sun J: Existence of periodic solution of a harvested system with impulses at variable times. Phys. Lett. A 2006, 360: 105-108. 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.080
Qi J, Fu X: Existence of limit cycles of impulsive differential equations with impulses at variable times. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 44: 345-353. 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00268-0
Bajo I, Liz E: Periodic boundary value problem for first order differential equations with impulses at variable times. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1996, 204: 65-73. 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0424
Belley J, Virgilio M: Periodic Duffing delay equations with state dependent impulses. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 306: 646-662. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.10.023
Belley J, Virgilio M: Periodic Liénard-type delay equations with state-dependent impulses. Nonlinear Anal. 2006, 64: 568-589. 10.1016/j.na.2005.06.025
Frigon M, O’Regan D: First order impulsive initial and periodic problems with variable moments. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 233: 730-739. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6336
Yong L, Fuzhong C, Zhanghua L: Boundary value problems for impulsive differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 1997, 29: 1253-1264. 10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00177-0
Benchohra M, Graef JR, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: Upper and lower solutions method for impulsive differential inclusions with nonlinear boundary conditions and variable times. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 2005, 12: 383-396.
Frigon M, O’Regan D: Second order Sturm-Liouville BVP’s with impulses at variable times. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 2001, 8: 149-159.
Dedicated to Jean Mawhin on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the grant Matematické modely a struktury, PrF_ 2012_ 017.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Rachůnková, I., Tomeček, J. A new approach to BVPs with state-dependent impulses. Bound Value Probl 2013, 22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-22
- impulsive differential equation
- state-dependent impulses
- Dirichlet problem
- second-order ODE