- Research
- Open access
- Published:

# An order-type existence theorem and applications to periodic problems

*Boundary Value Problems*
**volume 2013**, Article number: 37 (2013)

## Abstract

Based on the fixed point index and partial order method, one new order-type existence theorem concerning cone expansion and compression is established. As applications, we present sufficient existence conditions for the first- and second-order periodic problems.

**MSC:**34B15.

## 1 Introduction and preliminaries

Let *X*, *Y* be real Banach spaces. Consider a linear mapping L:domL\subset X\to Y and a nonlinear operator N:X\to Y. Here we assume that *L* is a Fredholm operator of index zero, that is, Im*L* is closed and dim\hspace{0.17em}KerL=codim\hspace{0.17em}ImL<\mathrm{\infty}. Then the solvability of the operator equation

has been studied by many researchers in the literature; see [1–8] and the references therein. In [1], Cremins established a fixed point index for A-proper semilinear operators defined on cones which includes and improves the results in [5, 8, 9]. Using the fixed point index and the concept of a quasi-normal cone introduced in [10], Cremins established a norm-type existence theorem concerning cone expansion and compression in [11], which generalizes some corresponding results contained in [12].

In this paper, we will use the properties of the fixed point index in [1] and partial order to present a new order-type existence theorem concerning cone expansion and compression which extends the corresponding results in [12]. We recall that a partial order in *X* induced by a cone K\subset X is defined by

As applications, we study the first- and second-order periodic boundary problems and obtain new existence results. During the last few decades, periodic boundary value problems have been studied by many researchers in the literature; see, for example, [13–19] and the references therein. Our new results improve those contained in [13, 18].

Next we recall some notations and results which will be needed in this paper. Let *X* and *Y* be Banach spaces, *D* be a linear subspace of *X*, \{{X}_{n}\}\subset D and \{{Y}_{n}\}\subset Y be the sequences of oriented finite dimensional subspaces such that {Q}_{n}y\to y in *Y* for every *y* and dist(x,{X}_{n})\to 0 for every x\in D, where {Q}_{n}:Y\to {Y}_{n} and {P}_{n}:X\to {X}_{n} are sequences of continuous linear projections. The projection scheme \mathrm{\Gamma}=\{{X}_{n},{Y}_{n},{P}_{n},{Q}_{n}\} is then said to be admissible for maps from D\subset X to *Y*. A map T:D\subset X\to Y is called approximation-proper (abbreviated A-proper) at a point y\in Y with respect to an admissible scheme Γ if {T}_{n}\equiv {Q}_{n}T{|}_{D\cap {X}_{n}} is continuous for each n\in \mathbb{N} and whenever \{{x}_{{n}_{j}}:{x}_{{n}_{j}}\in D\cap {X}_{{n}_{j}}\} is bounded with {T}_{{n}_{j}}{x}_{{n}_{j}}\to y, then there exists a subsequence \{{x}_{{n}_{{j}_{k}}}\} such that {x}_{{n}_{{j}_{k}}}\to x\in D and Tx=y. *T* is simply called A-proper if it is A-proper at all points of *Y*. L:domL\subset X\to Y is a Fredholm operator of index zero if Im*L* is closed and dim\hspace{0.17em}\; KerL=codim\; \hspace{0.17em}ImL<\mathrm{\infty}. As a consequence of this property, *X* and *Y* may be expressed as direct sums; X={X}_{0}\u2a01{X}_{1}, Y={Y}_{0}\oplus {Y}_{1} with continuous linear projections P:X\to KerL={X}_{0} and Q:Y\to {Y}_{0}. The restriction of *L* to domL\cap {X}_{1}, denoted {L}_{1}, is a bijection onto ImL={Y}_{1} with continuous inverse {L}_{1}^{-1}:{Y}_{1}\to domL\cap {X}_{1}. Since {X}_{0} and {Y}_{0} have the same finite dimension, there exists a continuous bijection J:{Y}_{0}\to {X}_{0}. Let H=L+{J}^{-1}P, then H:domL\subset X\to Y is a linear bijection with bounded inverse. Let *K* be a cone in a Banach space *X*. Then {K}_{1}=H(K\cap domL) is a cone in *Y*. In [20], Petryshyn has shown that an admissible scheme {\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{L} can be constructed such that *L* is A-proper with respect to {\mathrm{\Gamma}}_{L}. The following properties of the fixed point index {ind}_{K} and two lemmas can be found in [1].

**Proposition 1.1** *Let* \mathrm{\Omega}\subset X *be open and bounded and* \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}=\partial \mathrm{\Omega}\cap K. *Assume that* {Q}_{n}{K}_{1}\subset {K}_{1}, P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N *maps* *K* *to* *K*, *and* Lx\ne Nx *on* \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}.

(P_{1}) (*Existence property*) *If* {ind}_{K}([L,N],\mathrm{\Omega})\ne \{0\}, *then there exists* x\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K} *such that* Lx=Nx.

(P_{2}) (*Normality*) *If* {x}_{0}\in {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}, *then* {ind}_{K}([L,-{J}^{-1}P+{\stackrel{\u02c6}{y}}_{0}],\mathrm{\Omega})=\{1\}, *where* {\stackrel{\u02c6}{y}}_{0}=H{x}_{0} *and* {\stackrel{\u02c6}{y}}_{0}(y)={y}_{0} *for every* y\in H{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}.

(P_{3}) (*Additivity*) *If* Lx\ne Nx *for* x\in {\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{K}\mathrm{\setminus}({\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cup {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}), *where* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1} *and* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2} *are disjoint relatively open subsets of* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}, *then*

*with equality if either of indices on the right is a singleton*.

(P_{4}) (*Homotopy invariance*) *If* L-N(\lambda ,x) *is an A*-*proper homotopy on* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K} *for* \lambda \in [0,1] *and* (N(\lambda ,x)+{J}^{-1}P){H}^{-1}:{K}_{1}\to {K}_{1} *and* \theta \notin (L-N(\lambda ,x))(domL\cap \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}) *for* \lambda \in [0,1], *then* {ind}_{K}([L,N(\lambda ,x)],\mathrm{\Omega})={ind}_{{K}_{1}}({T}_{\lambda},U) *is independent of* \lambda \in [0,1], *where* {T}_{\lambda}=(N(\lambda ,x)+{J}^{-1}P){H}^{-1}.

**Lemma 1.1** *If* L:domL\to Y *is Fredholm of index zero*, Ω *is an open bounded set and* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}\cap domL\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}, \theta \in \mathrm{\Omega}\subset X. *Let* L-\lambda N *be A*-*proper for* \lambda \in [0,1]. *Assume that* *N* *is bounded and* P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N *maps* *K* *to* *K*. *If* Lx\ne \mu Nx-(1-\mu ){J}^{-1}Px *on* \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K} *for* \mu \in [0,1], *then*

**Lemma 1.2** *If* L:domL\to Y *is Fredholm of index zero*, Ω *is an open bounded set and* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K}\cap domL\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}. *Let* L-\lambda N *be A*-*proper for* \lambda \in [0,1]. *Assume that* *N* *is bounded and* P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N *maps* *K* *to* *K*. *If there exists* e\in {K}_{1}\mathrm{\setminus}\{\theta \} *such that*

*for every* x\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{K} *and all* \mu \ge 0, *then*

## 2 An abstract result

We will establish an abstract existence theorem concerning cone expansion and compression of order type, which reads as follows.

**Theorem 2.1** *If* L:domL\to Y *is Fredholm of index zero*, *let* L-\lambda N *be A*-*proper for* \lambda \in [0,1]. *Assume that* *N* *is bounded and* P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N *maps* *K* *to* *K*. *Suppose further that* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1} *and* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2} *are two bounded open sets in* *X* *such that* \theta \in {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\subset {\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{1}\subset {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}, {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K\cap domL\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} *and* {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}\cap K\cap domL\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}. *If one of the following two conditions is satisfied*:

(C_{1}) (P+JQN)x+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)Nx\ngeqq x *for all* x\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K *and* (P+JQN)x+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)Nx\nleqq x *for all* x\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}\cap K;

(C_{2}) (P+JQN)x+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)Nx\nleqq x *for all* x\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K *and* (P+JQN)x+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)Nx\ngeqq x *for all* x\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}\cap K.

*Then there exists* x\in ({\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{2}\mathrm{\setminus}{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1})\cap K *such that* Lx=Nx.

*Proof* We assume that (C_{1}) is satisfied. First we show that

In fact, otherwise, there exist {x}_{1}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K and {\mu}_{1}\in [0,1] such that

then we obtain

Therefore,

which contradicts condition (C_{1}). From (2.1) and Lemma 1.1, we have

Choosing an arbitrary e\in {K}_{1}\mathrm{\setminus}\{\theta \}, next we prove that

In fact, otherwise, there exist {x}_{2}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}\cap K and {\mu}_{2}\ge 0 such that

then we obtain

in which the partial order is induced by the cone {K}_{1} in *Y*. So,

which is a contradiction to condition (C_{1}). Hence (2.3) holds, and then by Lemma 1.2, we have

It follows therefore from (2.2), (2.4) and the additivity property (P_{3}) of Proposition 1.1 that

Since the index is nonzero, the existence property (P_{1}) of Proposition 1.1 implies that there exists x\in ({\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{2}\mathrm{\setminus}{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1})\cap K such that Lx=Nx.

Similarly, when (C_{2}) is satisfied, instead of (2.2), (2.4) and (2.5), we have

and therefore

Also, we can assert that there exists x\in ({\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{2}\mathrm{\setminus}{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1})\cap K such that Lx=Nx. □

## 3 Applications

### 3.1 First-order periodic boundary value problems

We consider the following first-order periodic boundary value problem:

where f:[0,1]\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is continuous and f(0,x)=f(1,x) for all x\in \mathbb{R}.

Consider the Banach spaces X=Y=C[0,1] endowed with the norm \parallel x\parallel ={max}_{t\in [0,1]}|x(t)|. Define the cone *K* in X by

Let *L* be the linear operator from domL\subset X to *Y* with

and

Let us define N:X\to Y by

Then (3.1) is equivalent to the equation

It is obvious that *L* is a Fredholm operator of index zero with

Next we define the projections P:X\to X, Q:Y\to Y by

and the isomorphism J:ImQ\to ImP as Jy=y. Note that for y\in ImL, the inverse operator

of

is given by

where

Set

We can verify that

and

To state the existence result, we introduce two conditions:

(H_{1}) f(t,b)<0 for all t\in [0,1],

(H_{2}) f(t,x)>0 for all (t,x)\in [0,1]\times [0,a].

**Theorem 3.1** *Assume that there exist two positive numbers* 0<a<b *such that* (H_{1}), (H_{2}) *and*

(H_{3}) f(t,x)\ge -\frac{2}{3}x *for all* (t,x)\in [0,1]\times [0,b]

*hold*. *Then* (3.1) *has at least one positive periodic solution* {x}^{\ast}\in K *with* a\le \parallel {x}^{\ast}\parallel \le b.

*Proof* First, we note that *L*, as defined, is Fredholm of index zero, {L}_{1}^{-1} is compact by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem and thus L-\lambda N is A-proper for \lambda \in [0,1] by [[20], Lemma 2(a)].

For each x\in K, then by condition (H_{3}),

Thus (P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N)(K)\subset K.

Let

Clearly, {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1} and {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2} are bounded open sets and

We now show that

In fact, if there exists {x}_{3}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{2}\cap K such that

Then

Let {t}_{1}\in [0,1] be such that {x}_{3}({t}_{1})=b. Clearly, the function {x}_{3}^{2} attains a maximum on [0,1] at t={t}_{1}. Therefore 2{x}_{3}({t}_{1}){x}_{3}^{\prime}({t}_{1})=0. As a consequence,

which is a contradiction to (H_{1}). Therefore (3.2) holds.

On the other hand, we claim that

In fact, if not, there exists {x}_{4}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K such that

For any {x}_{4}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}\cap K, we have \parallel {x}_{4}\parallel =a, then 0\le {x}_{4}(t)\le a for t\in [0,1]. By condition (H_{2}), we have

which is a contradiction. As a result, (3.3) is verified.

It follows from (3.2), (3.3) and Theorem 2.1 that there exists {x}^{\ast}\in K\cap ({\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{2}\mathrm{\setminus}{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{1}) such that L{x}^{\ast}=N{x}^{\ast} with a\le \parallel {x}^{\ast}\parallel \le b. □

**Remark 3.1** In [18], the following condition is required instead of (H_{2}):

(H^{∗}) there exist a\in (0,b), {t}_{0}\in [0,1], r\in (0,1], and continuous functions g:[0,1]\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}), h:(0,a]\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) such that f(t,x)\ge g(t)h(x) for all t\in [0,1] and x\in (0,a], h(x)/{x}^{r} is nonincreasing on (0,a] with

Obviously, our condition (H_{2}) is much weaker and less strict compared with (H^{∗}). Moreover, (H_{2}) is easier to check than (H^{∗}). So, our result generalizes and improves [[18], Theorem 5].

**Remark 3.2** From the proof of Theorem 3.1, we can see that condition (H_{2}) can be replaced by one of the following two relatively weaker conditions:

({\mathrm{H}}_{2}^{\ast}) f(t,x)\ge 0 for all (t,x)\in [0,1]\times [0,a] and f(t,\cdot ) is positive for almost everywhere on [0,a].

({\mathrm{H}}_{2}^{\ast \ast}) {lim}_{x\to {0}^{+}}{min}_{t\in [0,1]}f(t,x)>0.

**Remark 3.3** Finally in this section, we note that conditions (H_{1}) and (H_{2}) can be replaced by the following asymptotic conditions:

({\mathrm{H}}_{1}^{\prime}) {lim}_{x\to +\mathrm{\infty}}\frac{f(t,x)}{x}<0 uniformly for *t*;

({\mathrm{H}}_{2}^{\prime}) {lim}_{x\to {0}^{+}}\frac{f(t,x)}{x}>0 uniformly for *t*.

**Example 3.1** Let the nonlinearity in (3.1) be

where 0<\alpha <1<\beta, c(t),d(t)\in C[0,1] are positive 1-periodic functions, k\in (0,2/3) and \mu >0 is a positive parameter. Then (3.1) has at least one positive 1-periodic solution for each 0<\mu <{\mu}^{\ast}, here {\mu}^{\ast} is some positive constant.

*Proof* We will apply Theorem 3.1 with f(t,x)=c(t){x}^{\alpha}+\mu d(t){x}^{\beta}-kx. Since k\in (0,2/3), it is easy to see that (H_{3}) holds. Set

where

Since 0<\alpha <1<\beta, we have

One may easily see that there exists b>0 such that

Let

Then, for each \mu \in (0,{\mu}^{\ast}), we have

which implies that (H_{1}) holds.

On the other hand, we have

which implies that ({\mathrm{H}}_{2}^{\prime}) holds. Now we have the desired result. □

### 3.2 Second-order periodic boundary value problems

Let f:[0,1]\times [0,+\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} be continuous and f(0,x)=f(1,x) for all x\in \mathbb{R}. We will discuss the existence of positive solutions of the second-order periodic boundary value problem

Since some parts of the proof are in the same line as that of Theorem 3.1, we will outline the proof with the emphasis on the difference.

Let *X*, *Y* be Banach spaces and the cone *K* be as in Section 3.1. In this case, we may define

and let the linear operator L:domL\to Y be defined by

Then *L* is Fredholm of index zero,

and

Define N:X\to Y by

Thus it is clear that (3.4) is equivalent to

We use the same projections *P*, *Q* as in Section 3.1 and define the isomorphism J:ImQ\to ImP as

where \beta =\frac{1}{6}. It is easy to verify that the inverse operator {L}_{1}^{-1}:ImL\to domL\cap KerP of L{|}_{domL\cap KerP}:domL\cap KerP\to ImL is

where

Set

We can verify that

and

**Theorem 3.2** *Assume that there exist two positive numbers* 0<a<b *such that* (H_{1}), (H_{2}) *and*

(H_{4}) f(t,x)\ge -4x *for all* (t,x)\in [0,1]\times [0,b]

*hold*. *Then* (3.4) *has at least one positive periodic solution* {x}^{\ast}\in K *with* a\le \parallel {x}^{\ast}\parallel \le b.

*Proof* It is again easy to show that L-\lambda N is A-proper for \lambda \in [0,1] by [[20], Lemma 2(a)].

For each x\in K, then by condition (H_{4}),

Thus (P+JQN+{L}_{1}^{-1}(I-Q)N)(K)\subset K.

Let

Clearly, {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{3} and {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{4} are bounded and open sets and

Next, we show that

On the contrary, suppose that there exists {x}_{5}\in \partial {\mathrm{\Omega}}_{4}\cap K such that

Then

Let {t}_{2}\in [0,1] such that {x}_{5}({t}_{2})={max}_{t\in [0,1]}{x}_{5}(t)=b. Using the boundary conditions, we have {t}_{2}\in (0,1). In this case, {x}_{5}^{\prime}({t}_{2})=0, {x}_{5}^{\u2033}({t}_{2})\le 0. This gives

which is a contradiction to condition (H_{1}). Therefore (3.5) holds.

Finally, similar to the proof of (3.3), it follows from condition (H_{2}) that

Consequently all conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Therefore, there exists {x}^{\ast}\in K\cap ({\overline{\mathrm{\Omega}}}_{4}\mathrm{\setminus}{\mathrm{\Omega}}_{3}) such that L{x}^{\ast}=N{x}^{\ast} with {x}^{\ast}\in K and a\le \parallel {x}^{\ast}\parallel \le b and the assertion follows. □

## References

Cremins CT: A fixed-point index and existence theorems for semilinear equations in cones.

*Nonlinear Anal.*2001, 46: 789-806. 10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00144-9Feckan M: Existence of nonzero nonnegative solutions of semilinear equations at resonance.

*Comment. Math. Univ. Carol.*1998, 39: 709-719.Gaines R, Mawhin J Lecture Notes in Mathematics 568. In

*Coincidence Degree, and Nonlinear Differential Equations*. Springer, Berlin; 1977.Mawhin J: Equivalence theorems for nonlinear operator equations and coincidence degree theory for some mappings in locally convex topological vector spaces.

*J. Differ. Equ.*1972, 12: 610-636. 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90028-9Mawhin J: Landesman-Lazer’s type problems for nonlinear equations.

*Conf. Semin. Mat. Univ. Bari*1977, 147: 1-22.Nieto JJ: Existence of solutions in a cone for nonlinear alternative problems.

*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*1985, 94: 433-436. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1985-0787888-1Przeradzki B: A note on solutions of semilinear equations at resonance in a cone.

*Ann. Pol. Math.*1993, 58: 95-103.Santanilla J: Existence of nonnegative solutions of a semilinear equation at resonance with linear growth.

*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*1989, 105: 963-971. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1989-0964462-9Gaines R, Santanilla J: A coincidence theorem in convex sets with applications to periodic solutions of ordinary differential equations.

*Rocky Mt. J. Math.*1982, 12: 669-678. 10.1216/RMJ-1982-12-4-669Petryshyn WV: On the solvability of x\in Tx+\lambda Fx in quasinormal cones with

*T*and*F**k*-set contractive.*Nonlinear Anal.*1981, 5: 585-591. 10.1016/0362-546X(81)90105-XCremins CT: Existence theorems for semilinear equations in cones.

*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2002, 265: 447-457. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7746Deimling K:

*Nonlinear Functional Analysis*. Springer, Berlin; 1985.Chu J, Lin X, Jiang D, O’Regan D, Agarwal RP: Multiplicity of positive solutions to second order differential equations.

*Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.*2006, 73: 175-182. 10.1017/S0004972700038764Chu J, Torres PJ: Applications of Schauder’s fixed point theorem to singular differential equations.

*Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.*2007, 39: 653-660. 10.1112/blms/bdm040Chu J, Nieto JJ: Impulsive periodic solutions of first-order singular differential equations.

*Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.*2008, 40: 143-150. 10.1112/blms/bdm110Chu J, Zhang Z: Periodic solutions of singular differential equations with sign-changing potential.

*Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.*2010, 82: 437-445. 10.1017/S0004972710001607Franco D, Webb JRL: Collisionless orbits of singular and nonsingular dynamical systems.

*Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.*2006, 15: 747-757.O’Regan D, Zima M: Leggett-Williams norm-type theorems for coincidences.

*Arch. Math.*2006, 87: 233-244. 10.1007/s00013-006-1661-6Santanilla J: Some coincidence theorems in wedges, cones and convex sets.

*J. Math. Anal. Appl.*1985, 105: 357-371. 10.1016/0022-247X(85)90053-8Petryshyn WV: Using degree theory for densely defined A-proper maps in the solvability of semilinear equations with unbounded and noninvertible linear part.

*Nonlinear Anal.*1980, 4: 259-281. 10.1016/0362-546X(80)90053-X

## Acknowledgements

JC was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11171090, No. 11271333 and No. 11271078), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. NCET-10-0325), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (Grant No. 2012T50431). FW was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10971179) and the Natural Science Foundation of Changzhou University (Grant No. JS201008).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Chu, J., Wang, F. An order-type existence theorem and applications to periodic problems.
*Bound Value Probl* **2013**, 37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-37

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-37