# Homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in micropolar fluid flow from a permeable stretching or shrinking sheet in a porous medium

- Sachin Shaw
^{1}, - Peri K Kameswaran
^{1}and - Precious Sibanda
^{1}Email author

**2013**:77

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-77

© Shaw et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

**Received: **18 December 2012

**Accepted: **18 March 2013

**Published: **8 April 2013

## Abstract

The effects of a homogeneous-heterogeneous reaction on steady micropolar fluid flow from a permeable stretching or shrinking sheet in a porous medium are numerically investigated in this paper. The model developed by Chaudhary and Merkin (Fluid Dyn. Res. 16:311-333, 1995) for a homogeneous-heterogeneous reaction in boundary layer flow with equal diffusivities for reactant and autocatalysis is used and extended in this study. The uniqueness of this problem lies in the fact that the solutions are possible for all values of the stretching parameter $\lambda >0$, while for $\lambda <0$ (shrinking surface), solutions are possible only for a limited range of values. The effects of physical and fluid parameters such as the stretching parameter, micropolar parameter, permeability parameter, Schmidt number, strength of homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction parameter on the skin friction, velocity and concentration are analyzed, and these results are presented through graphs. The solute concentration at the surface is found to decrease with the strength of the homogeneous reaction, and to increase with heterogeneous reactions, the permeability parameter and stretching or shrinking parameters. The velocity at the surface was found to increase with the micropolar parameter.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction

Micropolar fluids are fluids with internal structures in which coupling between the spin of each particle and the microscope velocity field is taken into account. They represent fluids consisting of rigid, randomly oriented or spherical particles suspended in a viscous medium, where the deformation of fluid particles is ignored. Micropolar fluid theory was introduced by Eringen [1] in order to describe physical systems, which do not satisfy the Navier-Stokes equations. The equations governing the micropolar fluid involve a spin vector and a microinertia tensor in addition to the velocity vector. The potential importance of micropolar fluids in industrial applications has motivated many researchers to extend the study in numerous ways to include various physical effects. The essence of the theory of micropolar fluid lies in particle suspension (Hudimoto and Tokuoka [2]), liquid crystals (Lockwood *et al.* [3]); animal blood (Ariman *et al.* [4]), exotic lubricants (Erigen [5]), *etc.* An excellent review of the various applications of micropolar fluid mechanics was presented by Ariman *et al.* [6].

Boundary layer flow over a stretching surface is important as it occurs in several engineering processes, for example, materials manufactured by extrusion. During the manufacturing process, a stretching sheet interacts with the ambient fluid both thermally and mechanically. The study of boundary layer flow caused by a stretching surface was initiated by Crane [7]. Recently, several works on the dynamic of the boundary layer flow over a stretching surface have appeared in literature (Dutta *et al.* [8], Hayat *et al.* [9], Ishak [10]). The effect of surface conditions on the micropolar flow driven by a porous stretching sheet was studied by Kelson and Desseaux [11]. Mohammadein and Gorla [12] examined the flow of micropolar fluids bounded by a stretching sheet with prescribed wall heat flux, viscous dissipation and internal heat generation. The effect of suction or injection at a stretching surface was studied by Erickson *et al.* [13] and Fox *et al.* [14]. The process of suction is used in many engineering activities such as thermal oil recovery, removal of reactants *etc.* Elbashbeshy and Bazid [15] studied the flow and heat transfer in a porous medium over a stretching surface. Bhargava *et al.* [16] investigated the flow of a mixed convection micropolar fluid driven by a porous stretching sheet with uniform section. Later, Bhargava *et al.* [17] studied the same flow of a micropolar flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet. Abel *et al.* [18] carried out a numerical study of hydromagnetic micropolar fluid flow due to horizontal/vertical stretching sheet using a shooting method. They highlighted a scientific approach for the choice of the missing initial values on which the convergence of the shooting method highly depends. Recently, Narayana and Sibanda [19] studied the effects of laminar flow of a nanoliquid film over an unsteady stretching sheet. Kameswaran *et al.* [20] studied hydromagnetic nanofluid flow due to a stretching or shrinking sheet with viscous dissipation and chemical reaction effects. Recently, Kameswaran *et al.* [21] studied homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in a nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet.

Many chemically reacting systems involve both homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions, with examples occurring in combustion, catalysis and biochemical systems. The interaction between the homogeneous reactions in the bulk of fluid and heterogeneous reactions occurring on some catalytic surfaces is generally very complex, involving the production and consumption of reactant species at different rates both within the fluid and on the catalytic surfaces. A simple mathematical model for homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in stagnation-point boundary-layer flow was initiated by Chaudhary and Merkin [22]. They modeled the homogeneous (bulk) reaction by isothermal cubic kinetics and the heterogeneous (surface) reaction was assumed to have first-order kinetics. Later Chaudhary and Merkin [23] extended their previous work to include the effect of loss of the autocatalyst. They studied the numerical solution near the leading edge of a flat plate. A model for isothermal homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in boundary layer flow of a viscous fluid flow past a flat plate was studied by Merkin [24]. Ziabakhsh *et al.* [25] studied the problem of flow and diffusion of chemically reactive species over a nonlinearly stretching sheet immersed in a porous medium. Chambre and Acrivos [26] studied an isothermal chemical reaction on a catalytic in a laminar boundary layer flow. They found the actual surface concentration without introducing unnecessary assumptions related to the reaction mechanism. The effects of flow near the two-dimensional stagnation point flow on an infinite permeable wall with a homogeneous-heterogeneous reaction was studied by Khan and Pop [27]. They solved the governing nonlinear equations using the implicit finite difference method. It was observed that the mass transfer parameter considerably affects the flow characteristics. Khan and Pop [28] studied the effects of homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions on the viscoelastic fluid toward a stretching sheet. They observed that the concentration at the surface decreased with an increase in the viscoelastic parameter.

The purpose of the present study is to analyze the influence of the permeability, the homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction on the micropolar fluid towards a stretching/shrinking sheet. We transformed the governing momentum and concentration equations into a system of ordinary differential equations using a similarity variable and then numerically solved the equations for some values of the governing parameters. To the best of authors knowledge, such study has not been reported earlier in the literature.

## 2 Mathematical formulation

*x*and

*y*are taken along the surface and are normal to it, respectively, and

*u*and

*v*are the respective velocity components. The flow is generated due to stretching or shrinking of the sheet caused by the simultaneous application of two equal forces along the

*x*-axis. Keeping the origin fixed, it is assumed that the surface is stretched/shrunk with a linear velocity ${u}_{w}(x)={U}_{w}x$, where ${U}_{w}$ is a constant with ${U}_{w}>0$ for a stretching sheet, ${U}_{w}<0$ for a shrinking sheet and ${U}_{w}=0$ for a static sheet. We consider a simple model for the interaction between a homogeneous (or bulk) reaction and a heterogeneous (or surface) reaction involving the two chemical species

*A*and

*B*in a boundary layer flow proposed by Merkin [24] and Chaudhary and Merkin [22, 23] in the following form:

Here *a* and *b* are concentrations of chemical species *A* and *B*, and ${k}_{i}$ ($i=c,s$) are the rate constants. We also assume that both reaction processes are isothermal. It is also assumed that the ambient fluid moves with a velocity ${u}_{e}(x)={U}_{\mathrm{\infty}}x$, where ${U}_{\mathrm{\infty}}$ is a constant, in which there is a uniform concentration ${a}_{0}$ of reactant *A* and in which there is no autocatalyst *B* over a flat surface.

*ϵ*is the porosity,

*μ*is the dynamic viscosity, ${\mu}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is the effective dynamic viscosity,

*κ*is the vortex viscosity,

*ρ*is the fluid density,

*N*is the microrotation, $j=(\nu /{U}_{\mathrm{\infty}})$ is the microinertia per unit mass and

*γ*is the spin gradient viscosity defined as

*n*is a constant such that $0\le n\le 1$, where the case $n=0$ is called strong concentration (Guram and Smith [29]), indicates $N=0$ near the surface and represents concentrated particle flows in which the microelements close to the surface are unable to rotate (Jena and Mathur [30]). The case $n=1$ is used for the modeling of turbulent boundary layer flow (Peddieson [31]). The case $n=1/2$ indicates the vanishing of the antisymmetrical part of the stress tensor and denotes weak concentration (Ahmadi [32]), which is the case considered in the present study. We introduce the stream function

*ψ*, where $u=\partial \psi /\partial y$ and $v=-\partial \psi /\partial x$, which satisfies the continuity equation identically. Using similarity variables of the form

*η*. The boundary conditions (equation (2.9)) are written as

where $s=-\frac{{v}_{w}}{{({U}_{\mathrm{\infty}}\nu )}^{1/2}}$ is the mass transfer parameter with $s>0$ for suction, $s<0$ for injection and $s=0$ for an impermeable surface. $\lambda ={u}_{w}/{u}_{e}$ is the stretching parameter where $\lambda >0$ corresponds to a stretching surface and $\lambda <0$ corresponds to a shrinking surface. ${K}_{s}=({k}_{s}l{\mathit{Re}}^{-1/2}/{D}_{A})$ measures the strength of the heterogeneous (surface) reaction and $\mathit{Re}=({U}_{\mathrm{\infty}}l/\nu )$ is the Reynolds number.

*A*and

*B*are of comparable size, which leads us to further assumption that the diffusion coefficients ${D}_{A}$ and ${D}_{B}$ are equal,

*i.e.*, $\delta =1$ (Chaudhary and Merkin [22]). This assumption leads to the following relation:

where ${\mathit{Re}}_{x}$ represents the local Reynolds number defined by ${\mathit{Re}}_{x}=x{u}_{e}(x)/\nu $. In the present paper, we consider only the case $s\ge 0$ (suction) and $n=1/2$ (weak concentration).

## 3 Results and discussion

*λ*, ${K}_{p}$, ${K}_{s}$,

*k*,

*χ*and

*Sc*using Matlab bvp4c routine. We compare our results for a stretching sheet with those reported by Wang [33], Ishak

*et al.*[34] and Rosali

*et al.*[35] in Table 1; and for the shrinking sheet, we compare our results with those reported by Rosali

*et al.*[35] in Table 2. These show an excellent agreement with our present results. This investigation confirms that the existence and uniqueness of solution depends on the stretching/shrinking sheet parameter. It is also found that the solutions of equations (2.10), (2.11) and (2.17) can be obtained for all values of

*λ*, while for the case of a shrinking surface ($\lambda <0$), the governing equations have the solution only in the range of $\lambda >{\lambda}_{c}$, where ${\lambda}_{c}$ is a critical value of

*λ*, which depends on the other parameter, and we have no solution for $\lambda <{\lambda}_{c}$. A dual solution appears for the range ${\lambda}_{c}\le \lambda <-1$. We have plotted the velocity profile, concentration profile and concentration at the surface for different parameters. In this problem, we have shown single as well as dual solution. As was mentioned by Merkin [36], Merrill

*et al.*[37] and Rosali

*et al.*[35], the first solution is stable and physically realizable, while the second solution is unstable. Although the second solution seems to be deprived of physical significance, it is interesting in nonlinear differential equation theory, since a similar equation may reappear in some other situations where the corresponding solution could have a more realistic meaning.

**Comparison of**
${\mathit{f}}^{\mathbf{\u2033}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**for a stretching sheet obtained for different values of**
λ
**, for fixed values of**
$\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$
**,**
${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$
**and**
$\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$

λ | Wang [33] | Ishak et al. [34] | Rosali et al. [35] | Present | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$, $\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$, $\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$ | ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$, $\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.8}$, $\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.5}$ | ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$, $\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$, $\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$ | ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{1}$, $\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.8}$, $\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.5}$ | |||

0 | 1.232588 | 1.232588 | 1.232588 | 1.476217 | 1.23258766 | 1.47621732 |

0.1 | 1.14656 | 1.146561 | 1.146561 | 1.353345 | 1.14656100 | 1.35334508 |

0.2 | 1.05113 | 1.051130 | 1.051130 | 1.224482 | 1.05112999 | 1.22448220 |

0.3 | - | - | 0.946816 | 1.089841 | 0.94681612 | 1.08984055 |

0.4 | - | - | 0.834072 | 0.949614 | 0.83407209 | 0.94961358 |

0.5 | 0.71330 | 0.713295 | 0.713295 | 0.803979 | 0.71329496 | 0.80397876 |

1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

2 | −1.88731 | −1.887307 | −1.887307 | −1.941163 | −1.88730667 | −1.94116318 |

3 | - | −4.276541 | −4.276541 | −4.260253 | −4.27654145 | −4.26025264 |

4 | - | −7.086378 | −7.086378 | −6.904439 | −7.08637761 | −6.90443860 |

5 | −10.26475 | −10.264749 | −10.264749 | −9.837608 | −10.26474931 | −9.83760839 |

**Comparison of**
${\mathit{f}}^{\mathbf{\u2033}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$
**for a shrinking sheet obtained for different values of**
λ
**, for fixed values of**
$\mathit{\chi}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$
**,**
${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$
**and**
$\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0}$

λ | Rosali et al. [35] | Present | Present ${\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{p}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.1}$, $\mathit{s}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.5}$, $\mathit{n}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{0.5}$ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{1}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | ${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{2}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | ${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{1}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | ${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{2}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | ${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{1}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | ${\mathit{f}}_{\mathbf{2}}^{\mathbf{\prime}\mathbf{\prime}}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{0}\mathbf{)}$ | |

−0.25 | 1.402241 | - | 1.40224081 | 1.476217 | 1.74572680 | - |

−0.5 | 1.495670 | - | 1.49566977 | - | 1.92932844 | - |

−0.75 | 1.489298 | - | 1.48929824 | - | 2.03317043 | - |

−1 | 1.328817 | - | 1.32881688 | - | 2.03159280 | - |

−1.05 | 1.266228 | 0.012200 | 1.26622794 | 0.01217792 | 1.99074154 | - |

−1.1 | 1.186681 | 0.049229 | 1.18668029 | 0.04922896 | 1.95891087 | 0.01321262 |

−1.15 | 1.082231 | 0.116702 | 1.08223117 | 0.11670214 | 1.91789479 | 0.5199976 |

−1.2 | 0.932474 | 0.233650 | 0.93247336 | 0.23364973 | 1.86997809 | 0.08590024 |

−1.2465 | 0.584288 | 0.554290 | 0.58428167 | 0.55429620 | 1.86978009 | 0.08580041 |

−1.3 | - | - | - | - | 1.80045534 | 0.09071715 |

−1.4 | - | - | - | - | 1.60910179 | 0.27924033 |

−1.5 | - | - | - | - | 1.19739824 | 0.69637483 |

−1.5144 | - | - | - | - | 0.96885469 | 0.92623122 |

From Table 1, it is clear that the skin friction is a decreasing function of *λ*. All values of the skin friction coefficient are positive for $\lambda <1$, while they are negative when $\lambda >1$. Physically, the negative values of the skin friction coefficient correspond to the surface exerting a drag force on the fluid and the opposite sign implies the inverse phenomenon. The skin friction coefficient is zero when $\lambda =1$ regardless of the values of other parameters. This is because for $\lambda =1$, there is no shear stress at the surface as the surface and fluid move with the same velocity.

The effect of the stretching/shrinking parameter *λ* for $\lambda <0$ is shown in Table 2. It is evident that initially the skin friction is an increasing function of *λ*, but it decreases after a certain value of *λ*. As mentioned earlier, the solution of the equations is possible only in the range of $\lambda >{\lambda}_{c}$. It is evident that the value of ${\lambda}_{c}$ depends on other parameters ${K}_{p}$, *s* and *n*. The value of ${\lambda}_{c}$ is approximate to −1.2465 when ${K}_{p}=0$ and $s=0$, while introducing ${K}_{p}=0.1$ and $s=0.5$, we get ${\lambda}_{c}\approx -1.5144$. It is also observed that the first solution is a decreasing function of *λ*, whereas the second solution is an increasing function of *λ*. It is interested to note that these both solutions coincide at $\lambda ={\lambda}_{c}$.

*η*for some values of

*λ*in Figure 1. (i) For $\lambda >0$ (stretching surface), the fluid velocity is becoming increasingly greater than the free stream. In this case the fluid velocity decreases with the value of

*η*and converges at unity as per the condition. (ii) For $\lambda =0$ (static surface), the fluid velocity initially is stationary, but with

*η*value it increases in a nonlinear way. (iii) For $\lambda <0$ (shrinking surface), the fluid velocity is initially negative, but it increases with

*η*, and after a certain value of

*η*, it becomes positive. For the concentration profile, all the curves are started from the origin and they increase nonlinearly with

*η*to follow ‘

*S*’ shape and finally reach unity according to the given condition. For $\lambda =-1.2$ and −1.3, the graphs contain a dual solution. From the boundary condition, it is clear that the velocity at the surface is equal to

*λ*; and so with increase in

*λ*, the momentum boundary layer thickness increases for the case of the first solution, while an opposite phenomenon appears for the second solution which concurs with the results reported by Bhattacharyya

*et al.*[38]. It shows that for the first solution, the concentration boundary layer thickness increases with increase in

*λ*, while it decreases for the second solution.

*i.e.*, the micropolar parameter increases the velocity of the fluid, which is similar to the results given by Ishak

*et al.*[34]. A similar phenomenon is observed for concentration boundary thickness. The velocity of the fluid is reduced due to suction, and this leads to an increase in the solute concentration.

*η*in both cases, and after a certain

*η*value, they all coincide,

*i.e.*, after a certain

*η*value, the homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions have no effect on the concentration of the reactants. This critical value of

*η*(${\eta}_{\mathrm{\infty}}$) depends on the strength of the homogeneous reaction and increases with the value of

*K*, but it does not depend on the strength of the heterogeneous reaction. A similar phenomenon is observed for the second solution. The graphs for the second solution with ${K}_{s}=0.2$ and 1 coincide. It is observed that the first solution is more stable and converges more easily than the second solution.

*Sc*) and heterogeneous reaction parameter. The variation of the concentration with

*K*for different values of the Schmidt number and ${K}_{s}$ is shown in Figure 4. The Schmidt number is the ratio between a viscous diffusion rate and a molecular diffusion rate. For a fixed molecular diffusion rate, with increase in Schmidt number, the viscous diffusion rate increases, which reduces the velocity of the nanofluid and helps to increase the concentration of the nanofluid. Homogeneous reaction parameter and heterogeneous reaction parameter influence the reaction rate of the solute and help to reduce the concentration of the reactants, which concurs with the results reported by Khan and Pop [28].

## 4 Conclusions

The present analysis investigates the effect of the homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction on the micropolar fluid flow through a porous medium past a porous stretching/shrinking sheet with suction. The momentum and concentration equations were transformed into a set of coupled nonlinear differential equations using similarity transformations and solved numerically by Matlab bvp4c package. We compared our results with those in the literature for some limiting case. A dual solution appeared for the shrinking sheet case. The effect of the dual solution is shown by tables and graphs. The momentum boundary layer thickness increased for the case of the first solution, while an opposite phenomenon appeared for the second solution and a similar phenomenon was observed for concentration profile. It was observed that the concentration at the surface decreased with the strengths of the homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions. The solute concentration, however, increased with the permeability and stretching/shrinking parameters. The velocity of the fluid and the concentration of the reactants at the surface increase with the stretching/shrinking parameter. Also, velocity increases due to the increase in micropolar parameter. The concentration of the reactants decreases with the strength of the homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the University of KwaZulu-Natal for financial support.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Eringen AC:
**Theory of micropolar fluids.***J. Math. Mech.*1966, 16: 1-18.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Hudimoto B, Tokuoka T:
**Two-dimensional shear flows of linear micropolar fluids.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1969, 7: 515-522. 10.1016/0020-7225(69)90036-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lockwood F, Benchaita F, Friberg S:
**Study of lyotropic liquid crystal in viscometric flow and elastohydrodynamics contact.***Tribol. Trans.*1987, 30: 539-548.Google Scholar - Ariman T, Turk MA, Sylvester ND:
**On steady and pulsatile flow of blood.***J. Appl. Mech.*1974, 41: 1-7. 10.1115/1.3423224View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Eringen AC:
*Non-Local Polar Field Theory*. Academic Press, New York; 1976.Google Scholar - Ariman T, Turk MA, Sylvester ND:
**Microcontinuum fluid mechanics - a review.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1974, 12: 273-293. 10.1016/0020-7225(74)90059-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Crane LJ:
**Flow past a stretching plate.***Z. Angew. Math. Phys.*1970, 21: 645-647. 10.1007/BF01587695View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dutta BK, Roy P, Gupta AS:
**Temperature field in the flow over a stretching sheet with uniform heat flux.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*1985, 12: 89-94. 10.1016/0735-1933(85)90010-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hayat T, Javed T, Abbas Z:
**MHD flow of a micropolar fluid near a stagnation point towards a non-linear stretching surface.***Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl.*2009, 10(3):1514-1526. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.01.019MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ishak A:
**Thermal boundary layer flow over a stretching sheet in a micropolar fluid with radiation effect.***Meccanica*2010, 45: 367-373. 10.1007/s11012-009-9257-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kelson NA, Desseaux A:
**Effect of surface condition on flow of micropolar fluid driven by a porous stretching sheet.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*2001, 39: 1881-1897. 10.1016/S0020-7225(01)00026-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mohammadein AA, Gorla RSR:
**Heat transfer in a micropolar fluid over a stretching sheet with viscous dissipation and internal heat generation.***Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow*2001, 11: 50-58. 10.1108/09615530110364088View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Erickson LE, Fan LT, Fox VG:
**Heat and mass transfer on moving continuous flat plate with suction or injection.***Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.*1966, 5: 19-25. 10.1021/i160017a004View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Fox VG, Erickson LE, Fan LT:
**Methods for solving the boundary layer equations for moving continuous flat surfaces with suction and injection.***AIChE J.*1968, 14: 726-736. 10.1002/aic.690140510View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Elbashbeshy EMA, Bazid MAA:
**Heat transfer in a porous medium over a stretching surface with internal heat generation and suction or injection.***Appl. Math. Comput.*2004, 158: 799-807. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.141MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bhargava R, Kumar L, Takhar HS:
**Finite element solution of mixed convection micropolar fluid driven by a porous stretching sheet.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*2003, 41: 2161-2178. 10.1016/S0020-7225(03)00209-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bhargava R, Sharma S, Takhar HS, Beg OA, Bhargava P:
**Numerical solutions for microplar transport phenomena over a nonlinear stretching sheet.***Nonlinear Anal., Model. Control*2007, 12: 45-63.Google Scholar - Abel MS, Siddheshwar PG, Mahesha N:
**Numerical solution of the momentum and heat transfer equations for a hydromagnetic flow due to a stretching sheet of a non-uniform property micropolar liquid.***Appl. Math. Comput.*2011, 217: 5895-5909. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.12.081MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Narayana M, Sibanda P:
**Laminar flow of a nanoliquid film over an unsteady stretching sheet.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2012, 55: 7552-7560. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.07.054View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kameswaran PK, Narayana M, Sibanda P, Murthy PVSN:
**Hydromagnetic nanofluid flow due to a stretching or shrinking sheet with viscous dissipation and chemical reaction effects.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2012, 55: 7587-7595. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.07.065View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kameswaran PK, Shaw S, Sibanda P, Murthy PVSN:
**Homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in a nanofluid flow due to a porous stretching sheet.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2013, 57: 465-472. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.047View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chaudhary MA, Merkin JH:
**A simple isothermal model for homogeneous-heterogenous reactions in boundary-layer flow I. Equal diffusivities.***Fluid Dyn. Res.*1995, 16: 311-333. 10.1016/0169-5983(95)00015-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chaudhary MA, Merkin JH:
**A simple isothermal model for homogeneous-heterogenous reactions in boundary-layer flow II. Unequal diffusivities.***Fluid Dyn. Res.*1995, 16: 335-359. 10.1016/0169-5983(95)90813-HMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Merkin JH:
**A model for isothermal homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in boundary-layer flow.***Math. Comput. Model.*1996, 24: 125-136. 10.1016/0895-7177(96)00145-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ziabakhsh Z, Domairry G, Bararnia H, Babazadeh H:
**Analytical solution of flow and diffusion of chemically reactive species over a nonlinearly stretching sheet immersed in a porous medium.***J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.*2010, 41: 22-28. 10.1016/j.jtice.2009.04.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chambre PL, Acrivos A:
**On chemical surfaces reactions in laminar boundary layer flows.***J. Appl. Phys.*1956, 27: 1322-1328. 10.1063/1.1722258View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Khan WA, Pop I:
**Flow near the two-dimensional stagnation - point on an infinite permeable wall with a homogeneous-heterogeneous reaction.***Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.*2010, 15: 3435-3443. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.12.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Khan WA, Pop I:
**Effects of homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions on the viscoelastic fluid toward a stretching sheet.***J. Heat Transf.*2012., 134: Article ID 064506Google Scholar - Guram GS, Smith AC:
**Stagnation flows of micropolar fluids with strong and weak interactions.***Comput. Math. Appl.*1980, 6: 213-233.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jena SK, Mathur MN:
**Similarity solutions for laminar free convection flow of a thermomicropolar fluid past a non-isothermal vertical flat plate.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1981, 19: 1431-1439. 10.1016/0020-7225(81)90040-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Peddieson J:
**An application of the micropolar fluid model to the calculation of a turbulent shear flow.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1972, 10: 23-32. 10.1016/0020-7225(72)90072-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ahmadi G:
**Self-similar solution of incompressible micropolar boundary layer flow over a semi-infinite plate.***Int. J. Eng. Sci.*1976, 14: 639-646. 10.1016/0020-7225(76)90006-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wang CY:
**Stagnation flow towards a shrinking sheet.***Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.*2008, 43: 377-382. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.12.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ishak A, Lok YY, Pop I:
**Stagnation point flow over a shrinking sheet in a micropolar fluid.***Chem. Eng. Commun.*2010, 197: 1417-1427. 10.1080/00986441003626169View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rosali H, Ishak A, Pop I:
**Micropolar fluid flow towards a stretching/shrinking sheet in a porous medium with suction.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*2012, 39: 826-829. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Merkin JH:
**On dual solutions occurring in mixed convection in a porous media.***J. Eng. Math.*1985, 20: 171-179.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Merrill K, Beauchesne M, Previte J, Paullet J, Weidman P:
**Final steady flow near a stagnation point on a vertical surface in a porous medium.***Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.*2006, 49: 4681-4686. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.02.056View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bhattacharyya K:
**Dual solutions in boundary layer stagnation-point flow and mass transfer with chemical reaction past a stretching/shrinking sheet.***Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.*2011, 38: 917-922. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.04.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.