Research | Open | Published:
Multiplicity of positive solutions for Kirchhoff type problem involving critical exponent and sign-changing weight functions
Boundary Value Problemsvolume 2014, Article number: 19 (2014)
This paper is devoted to the study of a class of Kirchhoff type problems with critical exponent, concave nonlinearity, and sign-changing weight functions. By means of variational methods, the multiplicity of the positive solutions to this problem is obtained.
MSC:35J20, 35J60, 47J30, 58E50.
1 Introduction and main results
This paper is concerned with the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for the following problem:
where Ω is a smooth bounded domain in with and the parameters . The weight functions , satisfy the following conditions:
() and , where ;
() there exist positive constants and such that and in ;
() and ;
() and for all ;
() there exists such that as .
In (1), if we replace by , it reduces to the following Dirichlet problem of Kirchhoff type:
Problem (2) is related to the stationary analogue of the equation
proposed by Kirchhoff in  as an extension of the classical d’Alembert wave equation for free vibrations of elastic strings. Kirchhoff’s model takes into account the changes in the length of the string produced by transverse vibrations. It received great attention only after Lions  proposed an abstract framework for the problem. The solvability of the Kirchhoff type problem (2) has been paid much attention to by various authors. The positive solutions of such a problem are obtained by using variational methods [3–5]. Perera and Zhang  obtained a nontrivial solution of problem (2) via the Yang index and the critical group. He and Zou  obtained infinitely many solutions by using the local minimum methods and the fountain theorems. Recently, when is a continuous superlinear nonlinearity with critical growth, the existence of positive solutions of the Kirchhoff type problem has been studied [8–13]. Moreover, the paper  considered problem (2) with concave and convex nonlinearities by using a Nehari manifold and fibering map methods, and one obtained the existence of multiple positive solutions. In addition, the corresponding results of the Kirchhoff type problem can be found in [15–25], and the references therein.
In the present paper, we deal with problem (1) and consider the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of problem (1). About the critical growth situation, the aforementioned papers only showed the existence of positive solutions of the Kirchhoff type problem. Moreover, involving the concave and convex nonlinearities,  only considered the subcritical growth case. Therefore, our purpose is to extend the result of  to critical growth. The main results of this paper extend the corresponding results in  and .
Before stating our results, we give some notations and assumptions. Let , (), . In addition, we denote positive constants by . The main results of this paper are as follows.
Theorem 1 Let , and . Suppose that () and () hold, then there exists such that problem (1) for all has at least one positive solution.
Theorem 2 Let , and . Suppose that (), (), (), () and () hold, then there exists such that problem (1) for all has at least two positive solutions.
Remark 1 Our Theorem 2 extends the results for the critical case of Theorem 1.1 in . Our Theorem 2 shows that we have at least two positive solutions of problem (1), but the authors of the reference only obtain at least one positive solution of problem (1). In addition, the results of Theorem 2.1 in  are extended to critical growth.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give the local Palais-Smale condition. The proof of Theorems 1 and 2 is provided in Section 3.
2 The local Palais-Smale condition
In this section, we show that the corresponding functional of problem (1) satisfies the condition. Let , the corresponding functional of problem (1) is
It is well known that the critical points of the functional I in are weak solutions of problem (1). By the definition of weak solution u of problem (1), it means that satisfies
for any .
Define the best Sobolev constant,
From , we know that S is attained when by functions
Definition A sequence is called a sequence of I if and as . We say that I satisfies the condition if any sequence of I has a convergent subsequence.
Lemma 1 Let , and . Assume that () and () hold. If is a sequence of I, then is bounded in .
Proof By the Hölder inequality and the Young inequality, it follows from (3) and () that
for any , where . Let be a sequence of I. It follows from (4) that
Set , we see that is bounded in . □
Lemma 2 Let , , and . Assume that () and () hold. If is a sequence of I, then there exists a positive constant A depending on a, q, S, and such that
Proof Let be a sequence of I. By Lemma 1, we know that is bounded. Therefore, up to a subsequence, there exists such that converges weakly in , strongly in with and a.e. in Ω. By (), (), and the Dominated Convergence Theorem, we have
Thus, by using also the fact that , we get
from which it follows that in . Since I is , we obtain . In particular, we have , which implies that
It follows from (4) that
Set , and we have . □
Lemma 3 Let , and . Assume that () and () hold, then I satisfies the condition with = + + + − , where A is the positive constant given in Lemma 2.
Proof Let be a sequence of I with . By Lemma 1, we know that is bounded. Up to a subsequence, we may assume that
From Lemma 2, we have . By () and the Dominated Convergence Theorem, we obtain
Let ; by the Brezis-Lieb lemma , one has
Since , we obtain
According to and , we get
Assume that , it follows from (6) that
From (3), we have
As , we deduce that
It follows from (5), (6), and Lemma 2 that
which contradicts the fact that . Therefore, we have , which implies that in . Hence I satisfies the condition with . □
3 The proof of the main results
In this section, we show the proofs of our Theorems 1 and 2. Before we come to the proof of Theorem 1, we first recall the following lemma in .
Lemma 4 Let , and . Then there exists such that .
Proof of Theorem 1 Using the hypotheses () and (), it follows from (3) and (4) that
Let , we can find and such that for all
From Lemma 4, we obtain the result that there exists such that
Therefore, one has
Fix ; noticing that , it implies from (8) that there exists small enough such that . Thus we deduce that
By applying the Ekeland’s variational principle in , we obtain the result that there exists a sequence of I.
By the expression of , we can choose such that for all . It follows from and Lemma 3 that I satisfies the condition. Therefore, one has a subsequence still denoted by and such that in and
which implies that is a solution of problem (1). After a direct calculation, we derive , which implies . Since , we have . Applying the Harnack inequality , we see that is a positive solution of problem (1). The proof of Theorem 1 is completed. □
Lemma 5 Let , and . Assume that (), (), (), (), and () hold, then there exists , such that for any , we can find such that .
Proof For convenience, we consider the functional defined by
for all . According to () and (), we can choose such a cut-off function that for , for , and , where is a positive constant. Define
According to () and (), similar to the calculation of , we have the following estimate (as )
where . Define
for all . From (9), we have . Note that and for , so is attained for some . By
Therefore, we deduce from (9) that
By the expression of , we can choose such that for all . Using the definitions of I and , from () and (), we have
for all and . It follows that there exist and such that
for all and . Moreover, using the definitions of I and , it follows from () and (10) that
Let , it follows that
By the above two inequalities, for any , we have
Hence, we can choose such that for all
Therefore, for all and , we have
Set . Let , and , we deduce from (11) and (13) that
Proof of Theorem 2 Choose , from the proof of Theorem 1, we have already seen that problem (1) for any has a positive solution with . Now we only need to find the second positive solution of problem (1). According to (), we can see that (4) and (7) hold. It follows from () and Lemma 4 that there exists such that
According to (4), we have
which implies that
Hence, there exists a positive number such that and for any . It implies from (7) that the functional I has the mountain pass geometry. Define
From Lemma 5, we have . Applying Lemma 3, we know that I satisfies the condition. By the Mountain Pass Theorem , we obtain the result that problem (1) has the second solution with . After a direct calculation, we derive
which implies that . Hence we have . Since , we have . By the Harnack inequality, we obtain the result that is the second positive solution of problem (1). The proof of Theorem 2 is completed. □
Kirchhoff G: Mechanik. Teubner, Leipzig; 1883.
Lions JL: On some questions in boundary value problems of mathematical physics. North-Holland Math. Stud. 30. In Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations. North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1978:284-346. (Proc. Internat. Sympos., Inst. Mat., Univ. Fed. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1977)
Ma TF, Munoz Rivera JE: Positive solutions for a nonlinear elliptic transmission problem. Appl. Math. Lett. 2003, 16(2):243-248. 10.1016/S0893-9659(03)80038-1
Alves CO, Corra FJSA, Ma TF: Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type. Comput. Math. Appl. 2005, 49(1):85-93. 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.01.008
Bensedki A, Bouchekif M: On an elliptic equation of Kirchhoff-type with a potential asymptotically linear at infinity. Math. Comput. Model. 2009, 49: 1089-1096. 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.07.032
Perera K, Zhang ZT: Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff-type problems via the Yang index. J. Differ. Equ. 2006, 221: 246-255. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.03.006
He XM, Zou WM: Infinitely many positive solutions for Kirchhoff-type problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70(3):1407-1414. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.021
Figueiredo GM: Existence of positive solution for a Kirchhoff problem type with critical growth via truncation argument. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 401: 706-713. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.12.053
Liang SH, Shi SY:Soliton solutions to Kirchhoff type problems involving the critical growth in . Nonlinear Anal. 2013, 81: 31-41.
Wang J, Tian LX, Xu JX, Zhang FB: Multiplicity and concentration of positive solutions for a Kirchhoff type problem with critical growth. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 253(7):2314-2351. 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.023
Sun YJ, Liu X: Existence of positive solutions for Kirchhoff type problems with critical exponent. J. Partial Differ. Equ. 2012, 25(2):187-198.
Alves CO, Correa FJSA, Figueiredo GM: On a class of nonlocal elliptic problems with critical growth. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2010, 2(3):409-417.
Ahmed H, Mohammed M, Najib T: Existence of solutions for p -Kirchhoff type problems with critical exponent. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011., 2011: Article ID 105
Chen CY, Kuo YC, Wu TF: The Nehari manifold for a Kirchhoff type problem involving sign-changing weight functions. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 250: 1876-1908. 10.1016/j.jde.2010.11.017
Li YH, Li FY, Shi JP: Existence of a positive solution to Kirchhoff type problems without compactness conditions. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 253(7):2285-2294. 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.017
He XM, Zou WM:Existence and concentration behavior of positive solutions for a Kirchhoff equation in . J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 252(2):1813-1834. 10.1016/j.jde.2011.08.035
Chen CS, Huang JC, Liu LH: Multiple solutions to the nonhomogeneous p -Kirchhoff elliptic equation with concave-convex nonlinearities. Appl. Math. Lett. 2013, 26(7):754-759. 10.1016/j.aml.2013.02.011
Cheng BT, Wu X, Liu J: Multiple solutions for a class of Kirchhoff type problems with concave nonlinearity. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 2012, 19(5):521-537. 10.1007/s00030-011-0141-2
Azzouz N, Bensedik A: Existence results for an elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type with changing sign data. Funkc. Ekvacioj 2012, 55(1):55-66. 10.1619/fesi.55.55
Sun J, Liu SB: Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff type problems. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25(3):500-504.
Aouaoui S: Existence of three solutions for some equation of Kirchhoff type involving variable exponents. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218(13):7184-7192. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.12.087
Liu W, He XM: Multiplicity of high energy solutions for superlinear Kirchhoff equations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 39(1-2):473-487. 10.1007/s12190-012-0536-1
Liu DC, Zhao PH: Multiple nontrivial solutions to a p -Kirchhoff equation. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75(13):5032-5038. 10.1016/j.na.2012.04.018
Sun JJ, Tang CL: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Kirchhoff type equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74(4):1212-1222. 10.1016/j.na.2010.09.061
Yang Y, Zhang JH: Positive and negative solutions of a class of nonlocal problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73(1):25-30. 10.1016/j.na.2010.02.008
Talenti G: Best constant in Sobolev inequality. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1976, 110(4):353-372.
Brézis H, Lieb E: A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functional. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1983, 88: 486-490.
Chu CM, Tang CL: Multiple results for critical quasilinear elliptic systems involving concave-convex nonlinearities and sign-changing weight functions. Bull. Malays. Math. Soc. 2013, 36(3):789-805.
Ekeland I: On the variational principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1974, 47: 324-353. 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90025-0
Trudinger NS: On Harnack type inequalities and their application to quasilinear elliptic equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1967, 20: 721-747. 10.1002/cpa.3160200406
Hsu TS, Lin HL: Multiple positive solutions for singular elliptic equations with concave-convex nonlinearities and sign-changing weights. Bound. Value Probl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 584203
Ambrosetti A, Rabinowitz PH: Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Funct. Anal. 1973, 14: 347-381.
The author would like to thank the referees for valuable comments and suggestions on improving this paper. This paper was supported by Science and Education Youth culture project in Guizhou Province (Contract Number: Guizhou Provincial Institute of Zi (2012) No. 157). This paper also was supported by Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (No. J2141; No. LKM31).
The author declares that they have no competing interests.