Skip to main content

Multiplicity of positive solutions for Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian

{ D 0 + β ( ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , D 0 + α u ( 0 ) = 0 ,

where 1<α2, 0<β1, D 0 + α , D 0 + β are the standard Caputo fractional derivatives, ϕ p (s)=|s | p 2 s, p>1, ϕ p 1 = ϕ q , 1/p+1/q=1, ξ,η,γ,δ0, ρ:=ξγ+ξδ+ηγ>0, and f:[0,1]×[0,+)[0,+) is continuous. By means of the properties of the Green’s function, Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems, and fixed-point index theory, several new sufficient conditions for the existence of at least two or at least three positive solutions are obtained. As an application, an example is given to demonstrate the main result.

MSC:34A08, 34B18, 35J05.

1 Introduction

During the past decades, much attention has been focused on the study of equations with p-Laplacian differential operator. The motivation for those works stems from the applications in the modeling of different physical and natural phenomena: non-Newtonian mechanics [1], system of Monge-Kantorovich partial differential equations [2], population biology [3], nonlinear flow laws [4], combustion theory [5]. There exist a very large number of papers devoted to the existence of solutions for the equation with p-Laplacian operator.

The ordinary differential equation with p-Laplacian operator

( ϕ p ( u ( t ) ) ) +f ( t , u ( t ) ) =0,0<t<1,

subject to various boundary conditions, has been studied by many authors, see [6, 7] and the references therein.

The existence of positive solutions of the differential equation with p-Laplacian operator

( ϕ p ( u ( t ) ) ) +q(t)f ( t , u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) =0,0<t<1,

satisfying different boundary conditions have been established by using fixed-point theorems and monotone iterative technique, see [8, 9] and the references therein.

In [10], Hai considered the existence of positive solutions for the boundary value problem

{ ( q ( t ) ϕ ( u ) ) + λ f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , r < t < R , a u ( r ) b ϕ 1 ( q ( r ) ) u ( r ) = 0 , c u ( R ) + d ϕ 1 ( q ( R ) ) u ( R ) = 0 ,

where ϕ( u )=| u | p 2 u , p>1, f:(r,R)×(0,)R and λ is a positive parameter, f is p-superlinear or p-sublinear at ∞ and maybe singular at u=0.

However, few papers can be found in the literature on the existence of multiple positive solutions for the third-order Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem with p-Laplacian.

In [11], Zhai and Guo studied the third-order Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem with p-Laplacian

{ ( ϕ p ( u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , α u ( 0 ) β u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , u ( 0 ) = 0 ,

where ϕ p (s)=|s | p 2 s, p>1, ( ϕ p ) 1 = ϕ q , 1/p+1/q=1, α,β,γ,δ0, fC([0,1]×[0,),[0,)). By means of the Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems, some existence and multiplicity results of positive solutions are obtained. In later work, Yang and Yan [12] also studied the above problem by means of the fixed-point index method.

Recently, fractional differential equations have been of great interest. The motivation for those works stems from both the intensive development of the theory of fractional calculus itself and the applications such as economics, engineering and other fields [1317]. Much attention has been focused on the study of the existence and multiplicity of solutions or positive solutions for boundary value problems of fractional differential equations by the use of techniques of nonlinear analysis (fixed-point theorems [1825], upper and lower solutions method [26], fixed-point index theory [27, 28], coincidence theory [29], etc.).

Although the boundary value problems of fractional differential equation with p-Laplacian have been studied in many literature, only few papers can be found in the literature on the existence of multiple positive solutions for the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian. As the extension and supplement of some results in [11, 12], in this article, we investigate the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian subject Robin boundary value conditions

{ D 0 + β ( ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , D 0 + α u ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(1.1)

where 1<α2, 0<β1, D 0 + α , D 0 + β are the standard Caputo fractional derivatives, ϕ p (s)=|s | p 2 s, p>1, ϕ p 1 = ϕ q , 1/p+1/q=1, ξ,η,γ,δ0, ρ:=ξγ+ξδ+ηγ>0, and f:[0,1]×[0,+)[0,+) is continuous. By means of the properties of the Green’s function, Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems and fixed-point index theory, we establish the existence of at least two or at least three positive solutions for the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem (1.1). As an application, an example is given to demonstrate the main result.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we shall introduce some definitions and lemmas to prove our main results. In Section 3, we state our main results. We prove our main results by Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems and fixed-point index theory in Section 4. As an application, an example is presented to illustrate our main result in Section 5.

2 Preliminaries and lemmas

For the convenience of the reader, we give some background materials from fractional calculus theory to facilitate analysis of problem (1.1). These materials can be found in the recent literature, see [14, 17, 18, 3133].

Definition 2.1 ([17])

The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order α>0 of a function y:(0,+)R is given by

I 0 + α y(t)= 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t s ) α 1 y(s)ds

provided the right side is pointwise defined on (0,+).

Definition 2.2 ([17])

The Caputo fractional derivative of order α>0 of a continuous function y:(0,+)R is given by

D 0 + α y(t)= 1 Γ ( n α ) 0 t y ( n ) ( s ) ( t s ) α n + 1 ds,

where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α, provided that the right side is pointwise defined on (0,+).

Remark 2.1 ([14])

By Definition 2.2, under natural conditions on the function f(t), as αn the Caputo derivative becomes a conventional n th derivative of the function f(t).

Remark 2.2 ([18])

As a basic example, we have

D 0 + α t μ =μ(μ1)(μn+1) Γ ( 1 + μ n ) Γ ( 1 + μ α ) t μ α ,for t(0,+),

given in particular that D 0 + α t μ =0, μ=0,1,,n1, where D 0 + α is the Caputo fractional derivative, and n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

From the definition of the Caputo derivative and Remark 2.2, we can obtain the following statement.

Lemma 2.1 ([17])

Let α>0. Then the fractional differential equation

D 0 + α u(t)=0

has

u(t)= c 0 + c 1 t+ c 2 t 2 ++ c n 1 t n 1 , c i R,i=0,1,2,,n1

as the unique solution, where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

Lemma 2.2 ([17])

Let α>0. Assume that u, D 0 + α uL(0,1). Then the following equality holds:

I 0 + α D 0 + α u(t)=u(t)+ c 0 + c 1 t+ c 2 t 2 ++ c n 1 t n 1 ,

for some c i R, i=0,1,2,,n1, where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.

Lemma 2.3 Let yC[0,1] and 1<α2. Then the boundary value problem of the fractional differential equation

{ D 0 + α u ( t ) + y ( t ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0
(2.1)

has a unique solution,

u(t)= 0 1 G(t,s)y(s)ds,

where

G(t,s)={ ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) + η + ξ t ρ [ γ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + δ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ] , s t , η + ξ t ρ [ γ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + δ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ] , t s .
(2.2)

Proof By the Lemma 2.2, we can reduce the equation of problem (2.1) to an equivalent integral equation

u(t)= I 0 + α y(t) c 0 c 1 t= 0 t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) y(s)ds c 0 c 1 t,

for some constants c 0 , c 1 R. Moreover, we have

u (t)= 1 Γ ( α 1 ) 0 t ( t s ) α 2 y(s)ds c 1 .

From the boundary conditions ξu(0)η u (0)=0, γu(1)+δ u (1)=0, we have

ξ c 0 =η c 1 ,γ ( I 0 + α y ( 1 ) c 0 c 1 ) +δ ( I 0 + α 1 y ( 1 ) c 1 ) =0.

So,

c 0 = η ρ ( γ I 0 + α y ( 1 ) + δ I 0 + α 1 y ( 1 ) ) , c 1 = ξ ρ ( γ I 0 + α y ( 1 ) + δ I 0 + α 1 y ( 1 ) ) .

Hence, the unique solution of (2.1) is

u ( t ) = 0 t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) y ( s ) d s + η ρ ( γ 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) y ( s ) d s + δ 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 Γ ( α 1 ) y ( s ) d s ) + ξ t ρ ( γ 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) y ( s ) d s + δ 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 Γ ( α 1 ) y ( s ) d s ) = 0 t ( ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) + η γ + ξ γ t ρ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + η δ + ξ δ t ρ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) y ( s ) d s + t 1 ( η γ + ξ γ t ρ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + η δ + ξ δ t ρ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) y ( s ) d s = 0 1 G ( t , s ) y ( s ) d s ,

which completes the proof. □

Lemma 2.4 Let 1<α2, 0<β1. Then the boundary value problem of the fractional differential equation

{ D 0 + β ( ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , D 0 + α u ( 0 ) = 0
(2.3)

has a unique solution,

u(t)= 0 1 G(t,s) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) ds,

where G(t,s) is defined as (2.2).

Proof From Lemma 2.2 and the boundary value problem (2.3), we have

I 0 + β D 0 + β ( ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) ) = I 0 + β f ( t , u ( t ) ) = ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) + c 0 , for  c 0 R ,

that is

ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) = 0 t ( t τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) dτ c 0 ,for  c 0 R.

By D 0 + α u(0)=0, we have c 0 =0. So, D 0 + α u(t)+ ϕ q ( 0 t ( t τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f(τ,u(τ))dτ)=0. Thus, the boundary value problem (2.3) is equivalent to the following problem:

D 0 + α u ( t ) + ϕ q ( 0 t ( t τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 .

Lemma 2.3 implies that boundary value problem (2.3) has a unique solution,

u(t)= 0 1 G(t,s) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) ds,

which completes the proof. □

Lemma 2.5 The Green’s function G(t,s) defined by (2.2) is continuous on [0,1]×[0,1].

Assume η> 2 α α 1 ξ, then G(t,s) also has the following properties:

  1. (1)

    G(t,s)>0, for t,s[0,1];

  2. (2)

    G(t,s)G(s,s), for t,s(0,1);

  3. (3)

    there exists a positive number λ such that G(t,s)λG(s,s), for t,s[0,1], where λ=min{ 4 ξ γ δ ( ( α 2 ) ξ + ( α 1 ) η ) ( ( α 1 ) ξ δ + ξ γ η γ ) + 4 ξ γ ( ( α 1 ) η δ + η γ ) , 4 ξ η γ δ ( ( α 2 ) ξ + ( α 1 ) η ) ( ( α 1 ) ξ δ + ξ γ η γ ) + 4 ξ γ ( ( α 1 ) η δ + η γ ) }<1.

The method of proof is similar to Lemma 3.2 in [30], and we omit it here.

Definition 2.3 ([31])

Let E be a real Banach space and P be a nonempty, convex closed set in E. We say that P is a cone if it satisfies the following properties:

  1. (i)

    λuP for uP, λ0;

  2. (ii)

    u,uP implies u=θ, where θ denotes the null element of E.

If PE is a cone, we denote the order induced by P on E by ≤. For u,vP, we write uv if vuP.

Definition 2.4 ([31])

The map φ is said to be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P of a real Banach space E provided that φ:P[0,) is continuous and

φ ( t x + ( 1 t ) y ) tφ(x)+(1t)φ(y),

for all x,yP and 0t1.

Definition 2.5 ([31])

Let 0<a<b be given and let φ be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on the cone P. Define the convex sets P r , P ¯ r and P(φ,a,b) by P r ={yP|y<r}, P ¯ r ={yP|yr}, P(φ,a,b)={yP|aφ(y),yb}.

Lemma 2.6 (Leggett-Williams [32])

Let T: P ¯ c P ¯ c be a completely continuous operator and let φ be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P such that φ(y)y for all y P ¯ c . Suppose that there exist 0<a<b<dc such that

(A1) {yP(φ,b,d)|φ(y)>b} and φ(Ty)>b for yP(φ,b,d);

(A2) Ty<a for ya;

(A3) φ(Ty)>b for yP(φ,b,c) with Ty>d.

Then T has at least three fixed points y 1 , y 2 , and y 3 in P c ¯ satisfying y 1 <a, φ( y 2 )>b, y 3 >a, and φ( y 3 )<b.

Lemma 2.7 ([32])

Let T: P ¯ c P be a completely continuous operator and let φ be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on P such that φ(y)y for all y P ¯ c . Suppose that there exist 0<a<b<c such that

(B1) {yP(φ,b,c)|φ(y)>b}, and φ(Ty)>b for yP(φ,b,c);

(B2) Ty<a for ya;

(B3) φ(Ty)> b c Ty for y P ¯ c with Ty>c.

Then T has at least two fixed points y 1 and y 2 in P ¯ c satisfying y 1 <a, y 2 >a and φ( y 2 )<b.

Lemma 2.8 ([31])

Let P be a closed convex set in a Banach space E and let Ω be a bounded open set such that Ω p :=ΩP. Let T: Ω ¯ p P be a compact map. Suppose that xTx for all x Ω p .

(C1) (Existence) If i(T, Ω p ,P)0, then T has a fixed point in Ω p .

(C2) (Normalization) If u Ω p , then i( u ˆ , Ω p ,P)=1, where u ˆ (x)=u for x Ω ¯ p .

(C3) (Homotopy) Let ν:[0,1]× Ω ¯ p P be a compact map such that xν(t,x) for x Ω p and t[0,1]. Then i(ν(0,), Ω p ,P)=i(ν(1,), Ω p ,P).

(C4) (Additivity) If U 1 , U 2 are disjoint relatively open subsets of Ω p such that xTx for x Ω ¯ p ( U 1 U 2 ), then i(T, Ω p ,P)=i(T, U 1 ,P)+i(T, U 2 ,P), where i(T, U j ,P)=i(T | U ¯ j , U j ,P) (j=1,2).

Lemma 2.9 ([33])

Let P be a cone in a Banach space E. For q>0, define Ω q ={xp|x<q}. Assume that T: Ω ¯ q P is a compact map such that xTx for x Ω q . Thus, one has the following conclusions:

(D1) if xTx for x Ω q , then i(T, Ω q ,P)=0;

(D2) if xTx for x Ω q , then i(T, Ω q ,P)=1.

3 Main theorems

In this section, let E=C[0,1] be the Banach space of continuous functions endowed with u= max 0 t 1 |u(t)|, and the ordering xy if x(t)y(t) for all t[0,1]. Define the cone PE by

P= { u E | u ( t ) 0 , min 1 / 4 t 3 / 4 u ( t ) λ u } ,

where λ is given as in Lemma 2.5.

For convenience of the reader, we denote

M = ϕ q ( Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ( 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s ) 1 , N = 2 λ ϕ q ( 4 β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ( 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) d s ) 1 , f 0 : = lim u 0 + min 0 t 1 f ( t , u ) ϕ p ( u ) , f : = lim u + max 0 t 1 f ( t , u ) ϕ p ( u ) .

Lemma 3.1 Let T:PE be the operator defined by

Tu(t):= 0 1 G(t,s) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) ds.

Then T:PP is completely continuous.

Proof By Lemma 2.5, we have

T u ( t ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s , min 1 / 4 t 3 / 4 ( T u ) ( t ) = min 1 / 4 t 3 / 4 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s min 1 / 4 t 3 / 4 ( T u ) ( t ) λ 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s min 1 / 4 t 3 / 4 ( T u ) ( t ) λ T u .

Thus, T(P)P. In view of non-negativity and continuity of G(t,s), ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) and f(t,u(t)), we find that T:PP is continuous.

Let ΩP be bounded, i.e., there exists a positive constant M 0 such that u M 0 , for all uΩ. Let L= max 0 t 1 , 0 u M 0 |f(t,u)|+1, then, for uΩ, we have

| T u ( t ) | = | 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s | 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s L ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s = ϕ q ( L Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( s β ) d s .

Hence, T(Ω) is uniformly bounded. Further for any uΩ and t[0,1], we have

| ( T u ) ( t ) | | 0 t ( ( α 1 ) ( t s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) + ξ γ ρ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + ξ δ ρ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) ϕ q × ( 0 s L ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s + t 1 ( ξ γ ρ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + ξ δ ρ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) ϕ q ( 0 s L ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s | ξ ρ 0 1 ( γ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + δ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) ϕ q ( 0 s L ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s + 0 t ( α 1 ) ( t s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) ϕ q ( 0 s L ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s ξ ρ 0 1 ( γ Γ ( α ) ( 1 s ) α 1 + δ Γ ( α 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 ) ϕ q ( L s β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) d s + 0 t ( α 1 ) ( t s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) ϕ q ( L s β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) d s ϕ q ( L Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ξ γ + α ξ δ + α ρ ρ Γ ( α + 1 ) .

Hence, ( T u ) ϕ q ( L Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ξ γ + α ξ δ + α ρ ρ Γ ( α + 1 ) . For any 0 t 1 t 2 1 and uΩ, we have

| T u ( t 1 ) T u ( t 2 ) | = | t 1 t 2 ( T u ) ( t ) d t | t 1 t 2 | ( T u ) ( t ) | d t ϕ q ( L Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ξ γ + α ξ δ + α ρ ρ Γ ( α + 1 ) | t 2 t 1 | .

That is to say, T(Ω) is equicontinuous. By the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, we see that T:PP is completely continuous. The proof is completed. □

We are now ready to prove our main results.

Theorem 3.1 Let f(t,u) be nonnegative continuous on [0,1]×[0,+). Assume that there exist constants a, b with b>a>0 such that

(H1) f(t,u) ϕ p (Nb), for (t,u)[ 1 4 , 3 4 ]×[b, b λ 2 ];

(H2) f(t,u)< ϕ p (Ma), for (t,u)[0,1]×[0,a].

Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions u 1 and u 2 satisfying u 1 <a, min 1 4 t 3 4 u 2 (t)<b and u 2 >a, where λ is given as in Lemma  2.5.

Proof Let θ:P[0,+) be the nonnegative continuous concave functional defined by

θ(u)= min 1 4 t 3 4 u(t),uP.

Evidently, for each uP, we have θ(u)u.

It’s easy to see that T: P ¯ b λ 2 P is completely continuous and b λ 2 >b>a>0. We choose u(t)= b λ 2 , then

uP ( θ , b , b λ 2 ) ,θ(u)= b λ 2 >b.

So {uP(θ,b, b λ 2 )|θ(u)>b}. Hence, if uP(θ,b, b λ 2 ), then bu(t) b λ 2 for t[ 1 4 , 3 4 ]. Thus for t[ 1 4 , 3 4 ], from assumption (H1), we have

T u ( 1 2 ) = 0 1 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) N b ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) d τ ) d s N b ϕ q ( 1 4 β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) d s = 2 b λ > b λ .

Consequently,

min 1 4 t 3 4 Tu(t)λTu>λ× b λ =bfor  1 4 t 3 4 ,bu(t) b λ 2 .

That is,

θ(Tu)>b,for all uP ( θ , b , b λ 2 ) .

Therefore, condition (B1) of Lemma 2.7 is satisfied. Now if u P ¯ a , then ua. By assumption (H2), we have

T u = max 0 t 1 | T u ( t ) | = max 0 t 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s < M a max 0 t 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( s β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) d s M a ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = a ,

which shows that T: P ¯ a P a , that is, Tu<a for u P ¯ a . This shows that condition (B2) of Lemma 2.7 is satisfied. Finally, we show that (B3) of Lemma 2.7 also holds. Assume that u P ¯ b λ 2 with Tu> b λ 2 , then by the definition of cone P, we have

θ(Tu)= min 1 4 t 3 4 Tu(t)λTu> λ 2 Tu=b/ b λ 2 Tu.

So condition (B3) of Lemma 2.7 is satisfied. Thus using Lemma 2.7, T has at least two fixed points. Consequently, the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions u 1 and u 2 in P ¯ b λ 2 satisfying u 1 <a, min 1 4 t 3 4 u 2 (t)<b and u 2 >a. The proof is completed. □

Theorem 3.2 Let f(t,u) be nonnegative continuous on [0,1]×[0,+). Assume that there exist constants a, b, c with λ 2 c>b>a>0 such that

(H3) f(t,u)< ϕ p (Ma), for (t,u)[0,1]×[0,a];

(H4) f(t,u) ϕ p (Nb), for (t,u)[ 1 4 , 3 4 ]×[b, b λ 2 ];

(H5) f(t,u) ϕ p (Mc), for (t,u)[0,1]×[0,c].

Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least three positive solutions u 1 , u 2 and u 3 with u 1 <a, min 1 4 t 3 4 u 2 (t)>b, u 3 >a and min 1 4 t 3 4 u 3 (t)<b, where λ is given as in Lemma  2.5.

Proof If u P ¯ c , then uc. By assumption (H5), we have

T u = max 0 t 1 | T u ( t ) | = max 0 t 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s M c max 0 t 1 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( s β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) d s M c ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = c .

This shows that T: P ¯ c P ¯ c . Using the same arguments as in the proof of Lemma 3.1, we can show that T: P ¯ c P ¯ c is a completely continuous operator. It follows from the conditions (H3) and (H4) in Theorem 3.2 that c> b λ 2 >b>a. Similarly with the proof of Theorem 3.1, we have T: P ¯ a P a and

{ u P ( θ , b , b λ 2 ) | θ ( u ) > b } ,θ(Tu)>b,for all uP ( θ , b , b λ 2 ) .

Moreover, for uP(θ,b,c) and Tu> b λ 2 , we have

θ(Tu)= min 1 4 t 3 4 Tu(t)λTu> b λ >b.

So all the conditions of Lemma 2.6 are satisfied. Thus using Lemma 2.6, T has at least three fixed points. So, the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least three positive solutions u 1 , u 2 and u 3 with u 1 <a, min 1 4 t 3 4 u 2 (t)>b, u 3 >a and min 1 4 t 3 4 u 3 (t)<b. The proof is completed. □

Theorem 3.3 Let f(t,u) be nonnegative continuous on [0,1]×[0,+). If the following assumptions are satisfied:

(H6) f 0 = f =+;

(H7) there exists a constant μ 1 >0 such that

f(t,u)< ϕ p (M μ 1 ),for (t,u)[0,1]×[0, μ 1 ],

then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions u 1 and u 2 such that 0< u 1 < μ 1 < u 2 .

Proof From Lemma 3.1, we obtain T:PP is completely continuous. In view of f 0 =+, there exists σ 1 (0, μ 1 ) such that

f(t,u) ϕ p ( γ 1 u),for 0t1,0<u σ 1 ,

where γ 1 ( N 2 ,+).

Let Ω σ 1 ={uP|u< σ 1 }. Then, for any u Ω σ 1 , we have

T u ( 1 2 ) = 0 1 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( γ 1 u ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( γ 1 λ u ) d τ ) d s γ 1 λ u ϕ q ( 1 4 β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) d s = γ 1 λ u 2 λ N = 2 γ 1 N u > u ,

which implies Tu>u for u Ω σ 1 . Hence, Lemma 2.9 implies

i(T, Ω σ 1 ,P)=0.
(3.1)

On the other hand, since f =+, there exists σ 3 > μ 1 such that

f(t,u) ϕ p ( γ 2 u),for u σ 3 ,

where γ 2 ( N 2 ,+).

Let σ 2 >max{ σ 3 λ , μ 1 } and Ω σ 2 ={uP|u< σ 2 }. Then min 1 4 t 3 4 u(t)λu> σ 3 , for any u Ω σ 2 . By using the method to get (3.1), we obtain

Tu ( 1 2 ) > 2 γ 2 N u>u,

which implies Tu>u for u Ω σ 2 . Thus, from Lemma 2.9, we have

i(T, Ω σ 2 ,P)=0.
(3.2)

Finally, let Ω μ 1 ={uP|u< μ 1 }. Then, for any u Ω μ 1 , by (H7), we then get

T u ( t ) = 0 1 G ( t , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s < 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( M μ 1 ) d τ ) d s M μ 1 ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = μ 1 = u ,

which implies Tu<u for u Ω μ 1 . Using Lemma 2.9 again, we get

i(T, Ω μ 1 ,P)=1.
(3.3)

Note that σ 1 < μ 1 < σ 2 , by the additivity of fixed-point index and (3.1)-(3.3), we obtain

i(T, Ω μ 1 Ω ¯ σ 1 ,P)=i(T, Ω μ 1 ,P)i(T, Ω σ 1 ,P)=1

and

i(T, Ω σ 2 Ω ¯ μ 1 ,P)=i(T, Ω σ 2 ,P)i(T, Ω μ 1 ,P)=1.

Hence, T has a fixed point u 1 in Ω μ 1 Ω ¯ σ 1 , and has a fixed point u 2 in Ω σ 2 Ω ¯ μ 1 . Clearly, u 1 and u 2 are positive solutions of the boundary value problem (1.1) and 0< u 1 < μ 1 < u 2 . The proof is completed. □

Theorem 3.4 Let f(t,u) be nonnegative continuous on [0,1]×[0,+). If the following assumptions are satisfied:

(H8) f 0 = f =0;

(H9) there exists a constant μ 2 >0 such that

f(t,u)> ϕ p (N μ 2 ),for (t,u) [ 1 4 , 3 4 ] ×[λ μ 2 , μ 2 ].

Then the boundary value problem (1.1) has at least two positive solutions u 1 and u 2 such that 0< u 1 < μ 2 < u 2 .

Proof From Lemma 3.1, we obtain T:PP is completely continuous. In view of f 0 =0, there exists δ 1 (0, μ 2 ) such that

f(t,u) ϕ p ( κ 1 u),for 0t1,0<u δ 1 ,

where κ 1 (0,M).

Let Ω δ 1 ={uP|u< δ 1 }. Then, for any u Ω δ 1 , we have

T u ( t ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( κ 1 u ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( κ 1 u ) d τ ) d s κ 1 u ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = κ 1 M u < u ,

which implies Tu<u for u Ω δ 1 . Hence, Lemma 2.9 implies

i(T, Ω δ 1 ,P)=1.
(3.4)

Next, since f =0, there exists δ 3 > μ 2 such that

f(t,u) ϕ p ( κ 2 u),for u δ 3 ,

where κ 2 (0,M). We consider two cases.

Case 1: Suppose that f is bounded, which implies that there exists M >0 such that f(t,u) ϕ p ( M ) for all t[0,1] and u[0,+).

Take δ 4 >max{ M M , δ 3 }. Then, for uP with u= δ 4 , we get

T u ( t ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( M ) d τ ) d s M ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = M M < δ 4 = u .

Case 2: Suppose that f is unbounded. In view of f:[0,1]×[0,+)[0,+) being continuous, there exist t [0,1] and δ 5 >max{ δ 3 λ , μ 2 } such that

f(t,u)f ( t , δ 5 ) ,for 0t1,0u δ 5 .

Then, for uP with u= δ 5 , we obtain

T u ( t ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( t , δ 5 ) d τ ) d s 0 1 G ( s , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( κ 2 u ) d τ ) d s κ 2 δ 5 ϕ q ( 1 Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s = κ 2 δ 5 M < δ 5 = u .

So, in either case, if we always choose Ω δ 2 ={uE|u< δ 2 =max{ δ 4 , δ 5 }}, then we have

Tu<u,for u Ω δ 2 .

Thus, from Lemma 2.9, we have

i(T, Ω δ 2 ,P)=1.
(3.5)

Finally, Let Ω μ 2 ={uP|u< μ 2 }. Then, for any u Ω μ 2 , min 1 4 t 3 4 u(t)λu=λ μ 2 , by (H9), and we then obtain

T u ( 1 2 ) = 0 1 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) f ( τ , u ( τ ) ) d τ ) d s 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) ϕ q ( 0 s ( s τ ) β 1 Γ ( β ) ϕ p ( N μ 2 ) d τ ) d s N μ 2 ϕ q ( 1 4 β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) d s = 2 μ 2 λ > μ 2 = u ,

which implies Tu>u for u Ω μ 2 . An application of Lemma 2.9 again shows that

i(T, Ω μ 2 ,P)=0.
(3.6)

Note that δ 1 < μ 2 < δ 2 ; by the additivity of fixed-point index and (3.4)-(3.6), we obtain

i(T, Ω μ 2 Ω ¯ δ 1 ,P)=i(T, Ω μ 2 ,P)i(T, Ω δ 1 ,P)=1

and

i(T, Ω δ 2 Ω ¯ μ 2 ,P)=i(T, Ω δ 2 ,P)i(T, Ω μ 2 ,P)=1.

Hence, T has a fixed point u 1 in Ω μ 2 Ω ¯ δ 1 , and it has a fixed point u 2 in Ω δ 2 Ω ¯ μ 2 . Consequently, u 1 and u 2 are positive solutions of the boundary value problem (1.1) and 0< u 1 < μ 2 < u 2 . The proof is completed. □

4 Example

In this section, we present an example to illustrate the main result.

Example 4.1 We consider the boundary value problem of the fractional differential equation

{ D 0 + 1 2 ( ϕ p ( D 0 + 3 2 u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , 1 2 u ( 0 ) u ( 0 ) = 0 , 1 2 u ( 1 ) + 1 2 u ( 1 ) = 0 , D 0 + α u ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(4.1)

where

f(t,u)={ t 100 + 22 u 2 , for  u 2 , t 100 + u + 86 , for  u > 2 .

Let p=2. We note that α= 3 2 , β= 1 2 , ξ=γ=δ= 1 2 , η=1. By a simple calculation, we obtain ρ=1, λ= 1 5 <1 and

M = ϕ q ( Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ( 0 1 G ( s , s ) d s ) 1 = 1.3287 , N = 2 λ ϕ q ( 4 β Γ ( β + 1 ) ) ( 1 4 3 4 G ( 1 2 , s ) d s ) 1 = 43.1569 .

Choosing a=0.01, b=2, c=262, evidently, λ 2 c>b>a>0 and

f ( t , u ) = t 100 + 22 u 2 0.0122 < ϕ 2 ( M a ) = 0.013287 , for  ( t , u ) [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 0.01 ] , f ( t , u ) = t 100 + u + 86 88.0025 > ϕ 2 ( N b ) 86.3138 , for  ( t , u ) [ 1 4 , 3 4 ] × [ 2 , 50 ] , f ( t , u ) = t 100 + u + 86 348.01 < ϕ 2 ( M c ) = 348.1194 , for  ( t , u ) [ 0 , 1 ] × [ 0 , 262 ] .

Consequently, all the conditions of Theorem 3.2 are satisfied. With the use of Theorem 3.2, the boundary value problem (4.1) has at least three positive solutions u 1 , u 2 , and u 3 with

u 1 <0.01, min 1 4 t 3 4 u 2 (t)>2, u 3 >0.01,and min 1 4 t 3 4 u 3 (t)<2.

5 Conclusion

In this paper, the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian are investigated, the existence of at least two or at least three positive solutions for the fractional differential equations with Robin boundary conditions are given by using Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorems and the fixed-point index theory, respectively.

It is worth emphasizing that our work presented in this article has the following features: Firstly, the boundary conditions in (1.1) are important Robin boundary conditions. Secondly, our results improve and extend the main results of [11, 12] for the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of integer-order differential equations with p-Laplacian. For example, if α=2, β=1, then the problem (1.1) reduces to

{ ( ϕ p ( u ( t ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , u ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(5.1)

which is studied in [11, 12]. Furthermore, if we take p=2, problem (1.1) is the usual form of third-order Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem

{ u ( t ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ u ( 1 ) = 0 , u ( 0 ) = 0 .
(5.2)

The method can be applied on the Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of higher-order fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian and boundary conditions involving fractional derivatives

{ D 0 + β ( ϕ p ( D 0 + α u ( t ) ) ) + f ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , 0 < t < 1 , ξ u ( 0 ) η D γ u ( 0 ) = 0 , γ u ( 1 ) + δ D γ u ( 0 ) = 0 , D 0 + α u ( 0 ) = 0 .
(5.3)

Based on this paper, one can consider boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with parameters, and also one can do further research on eigenvalue problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian.

References

  1. Diaz JI, De Thelin F: On a nonlinear parabolic problem arising in some models related to turbulent flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1994, 25(4):1085-1111. 10.1137/S0036141091217731

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans LC, Gangbo W: Differential equations methods for the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 1999, 137(653):1-75.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Oruganti S, Shi J, Shivaji R: Logistic equation with p -Laplacian and constant yield harvesting. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2004, 2004(9):723-727. 10.1155/S1085337504311097

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ly I, Seck D: Isoperimetric inequality for an interior free boundary problem with p -Laplacian operator. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2004, 2004(109):1-12.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramaswamy M, Shivaji R: Multiple positive solutions for classes of p -Laplacian equations. Differ. Integral Equ. 2004, 17(11-12):1255-1261.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Hou C: Existence of multiple positive solutions for one-dimensional p -Laplacian. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 315(1):144-153. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.09.085

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lian H, Ge W: Positive solutions for a four-point boundary value problem with the p -Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68(11):3493-3503. 10.1016/j.na.2007.03.042

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun B, Qu Y, Ge W: Existence and iteration of positive solutions for a multipoint one-dimensional p -Laplacian boundary value problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 197(1):389-398. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.071

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao X, Ge W: Successive iteration and positive symmetric solution for a Sturm-Liouville-like four-point boundary value problem with a p -Laplacian operator. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71(11):5531-5544. 10.1016/j.na.2009.04.060

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hai DD: On singular Sturm-Liouville boundary-value problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2010, 140(1):49-63.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhai C, Guo C: Positive solutions for third-order Sturm-Liouville boundary-value problems with p -Laplacian. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2009, 2009(154):1-9.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang C, Yan J: Positive solutions for third-order Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems with p -Laplacian. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59(6):2059-2066. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.12.011

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oldham KB, Spanier J: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York; 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, New York; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meral FC, Royston TJ, Magin R: Fractional calculus in viscoelasticity: an experimental study. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2010, 15(4):939-945. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.05.004

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tenreiro Machado J, Kiryakova V, Mainardi F: Recent history of fractional calculus. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16(3):1140-1153. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.027

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Y, Sun S, Han Z, Zhang M: Positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217(16):6950-6958. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.103

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng W, Sun S, Han Z, Zhao Y: Existence of solutions for a singular system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62(3):1370-1378. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.076

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao Y, Sun S, Han Z, Li Q: The existence of multiple positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16(4):2086-2097. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.08.017

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nyamoradi N, Bashiri T: Multiple positive solutions for nonlinear fractional differential systems. Fract. Differ. Calc. 2012, 2(2):119-128.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmad B, Nieto JJ, Alsaedi A, El-Shahed M: A study of nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders in different intervals. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2012, 13(2):599-606. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.07.052

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han Z, Lu H, Sun S, Yang D: Positive solutions to boundary value problems of p -Laplacian fractional differential equations with a parameter in the boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012(213):1-14.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen T, Liu W: An anti-periodic boundary value problem for fractional differential equation with p -Laplacian operator. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25(11):1671-1675. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.01.035

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chai G: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of fractional differential equation with p -Laplacian operator. Bound. Value Probl. 2012, 2012: 1-18. 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Xiang H: Upper and lower solutions method for a class of singular fractional boundary value problems with p -Laplacian operator. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2010., 2010: Article ID 971824 10.1155/2010/971824

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dix JG, Karakostas GL: A fixed-point theorem for S -type operators on Banach spaces and its applications to boundary-value problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71(9):3872-3880. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.057

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu J, Wei Z, Dong W: Uniqueness of positive solutions for a class of fractional boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25(3):590-593. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.065

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen T, Liu W, Hu Z: A boundary value problem for fractional differential equation with p -Laplacian operator at resonance. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75(6):3210-3217. 10.1016/j.na.2011.12.020

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao Y, Chen H, Huang L: Existence of positive solutions for nonlinear fractional functional differential equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64(10):3456-3467. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.081

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo D, Lakshmikantham V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones. Academic Press, Orlando; 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Leggett RW, Williams LR: Multiple positive fixed points of nonlinear operators on ordered Banach spaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1979, 28(4):673-688. 10.1512/iumj.1979.28.28046

    MATH  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Deimling K: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Springer, New York; 1985.

    MATH  Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and useful comments that have led to the present improved version of the original manuscript. This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (11071143, 61374074), Natural Science Outstanding Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201119) and supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2012AM009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenlai Han.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, H., Han, Z. & Sun, S. Multiplicity of positive solutions for Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian. Bound Value Probl 2014, 26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2014-26

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2014-26

Keywords

  • Sturm-Liouville boundary value problem
  • positive solution of fractional differential equation
  • Leggett-Williams fixed-point theorem
  • fixed-point index theory
  • p-Laplacian operator