 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Oscillation of fourthorder neutral differential equations with pLaplacian like operators
Boundary Value Problems volume 2014, Article number: 56 (2014)
Abstract
We study oscillatory behavior of a class of fourthorder neutral differential equations with a pLaplacian like operator using the Riccati transformation and integral averaging technique. A Kamenevtype oscillation criterion is presented assuming that the noncanonical case is satisfied. This new theorem complements and improves a number of results reported in the literature. An illustrative example is provided.
MSC:34C10, 34K11.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we are concerned with oscillation of a class of fourthorder neutral differential equations with a pLaplacian like operator
where
It is interesting to study equation (1.1) since the pLaplace differential equations have applications in continuum mechanics as seen from [1]. Throughout, we assume that p>1 is a constant, \mathbb{I}:=[{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}), r\in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}(\mathbb{I},(0,\mathrm{\infty})), {r}^{\prime}(t)\ge 0, a,\sigma ,{q}_{i},{\tau}_{i}\in \mathrm{C}(\mathbb{I},\mathbb{R}), 0\le a(t)<1, {q}_{i}(t)\ge 0, i=1,2,\dots ,l, \sigma (t)\le t, {lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}\sigma (t)=\mathrm{\infty}, there exists a function \tau \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}(\mathbb{I},\mathbb{R}) such that \tau (t)\le {\tau}_{i}(t) for i=1,2,\dots ,l, \tau (t)\le t, {\tau}^{\prime}(t)>0, and {lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}\tau (t)=\mathrm{\infty}.
We use the notation {t}_{1}:={min}_{t\in [{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty})}\{\sigma (t),{\tau}_{1}(t),{\tau}_{2}(t),\dots ,{\tau}_{l}(t)\}. By a solution of (1.1), we mean a function x\in \mathrm{C}([{t}_{1},\mathrm{\infty}),\mathbb{R}) which has the property r{{z}^{\u2034}}^{p2}{z}^{\u2034}\in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}(\mathbb{I},\mathbb{R}) and satisfies (1.1) on \mathbb{I}. We consider only those solutions x of (1.1) which satisfy sup\{x(t):t\ge {t}_{\ast}\}>0 for all {t}_{\ast}\ge {t}_{0} and tacitly assume that (1.1) possesses such solutions. A solution x of (1.1) is called oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on \mathbb{I}; otherwise, it is said to be nonoscillatory. Equation (1.1) is termed oscillatory if all its solutions oscillate.
Fourthorder differential equations naturally appear in models concerning physical, biological, and chemical phenomena; see [2]. In mechanical and engineering problems, questions related to the existence of oscillatory solutions play an important role. During the past few years, there has been constant interest in obtaining sufficient conditions for oscillatory and nonoscillatory properties of different classes of fourthorder differential equations. We refer the reader to [3–21] and the references cited therein. Parhi and Tripathy [12, 13] and Thandapani and Savitri [15] studied a fourthorder neutral differential equation
Most oscillation results reported in [6, 7, 9, 18] for (1.1) and its particular cases have been obtained under the assumption that
where
The analogue for (1.1) in case a(t)=0 has been studied in [10, 16, 17, 19–21] under the condition that
which is called a noncanonical case. Assuming (1.3), a question regarding the oscillation and asymptotic behavior of solutions to (1.1) in the case
has been studied by Li et al. [11]. Note that [[11], Theorem 2.2] ensures that every solution x of the studied equation is either oscillatory or tends to zero as t\to \mathrm{\infty} and, unfortunately, cannot distinguish solutions with different behaviors.
It should be noted that research in this paper is strongly motivated by the recent paper [11]. The purpose of this paper is to establish a Kamenevtype theorem which guarantees that all solutions of equation (1.1) are oscillatory in the case where (1.3) holds and without requiring conditions (1.4). In the sequel, all functional inequalities are assumed to hold for all t large enough.
2 Main results
We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1 (See [14])
Let f\in {\mathrm{C}}^{n}(\mathbb{I},{\mathbb{R}}^{+}). Assume that {f}^{(n)} is eventually of one sign for all large t, and there exists a {t}_{1}\ge {t}_{0} such that {f}^{(n)}(t){f}^{(n1)}(t)\le 0 for all t\ge {t}_{1}. Then, for every constant \lambda \in (0,1), there exist a {t}_{\lambda}\in [{t}_{1},\mathrm{\infty}) and a constant M>0 such that
for all t\in [{t}_{\lambda},\mathrm{\infty}).
Lemma 2.2 (See [[4], Lemma 2.2.3])
Let f be as in Lemma 2.1. If {lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}f(t)\ne 0, then, for every constant k\in (0,1), there exists a {t}_{k}\in [{t}_{1},\mathrm{\infty}) such that
for all t\in [{t}_{k},\mathrm{\infty}).
Theorem 2.3 Assume (1.3) and let one of the following conditions hold:
and
Suppose also that there exist functions \rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}(\mathbb{I},(0,\mathrm{\infty})), H,\varrho \in \mathrm{C}(\mathbb{D},\mathbb{R}), where \mathbb{D}=\{(t,s):t\ge s\ge {t}_{0}\} such that
and H has a nonpositive continuous partial derivative \partial H/\partial s satisfying, for all sufficiently large T\ge {t}_{0}, for some constant \lambda \in (0,1), and for all constants M>0,
where
and
If there exist functions \delta \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}(\mathbb{I},(0,\mathrm{\infty})), K,\xi \in \mathrm{C}(\mathbb{D},\mathbb{R}) such that
and K has a nonpositive continuous partial derivative \partial K/\partial s satisfying, for all sufficiently large T\ge {t}_{0} and for some constant k\in (0,1),
where
and
then equation (1.1) is oscillatory.
Proof Let x be a nonoscillatory solution of (1.1). Without loss of generality, we may assume that x is eventually positive. Equation (1.1) implies that there exists a {t}_{1}\ge {t}_{0} such that the following three possible cases hold for all t\ge {t}_{1}:

(1)
z(t)>0, {z}^{\prime}(t)<0, {z}^{\u2033}(t)>0, {z}^{\u2034}(t)<0, {(r{{z}^{\u2034}}^{p2}{z}^{\u2034})}^{\prime}(t)\le 0;

(2)
z(t)>0, {z}^{\prime}(t)>0, {z}^{\u2034}(t)>0, {z}^{(4)}(t)\le 0, {(r{{z}^{\u2034}}^{p2}{z}^{\u2034})}^{\prime}(t)\le 0;

(3)
z(t)>0, {z}^{\prime}(t)>0, {z}^{\u2033}(t)>0, {z}^{\u2034}(t)<0, {(r{{z}^{\u2034}}^{p2}{z}^{\u2034})}^{\prime}(t)\le 0.
We consider each of these cases separately.
Case 1. Assume that (1) is satisfied. Noting that r{({z}^{\u2034})}^{p1} is nondecreasing, we have, for s\ge t\ge {t}_{1},
Dividing the latter inequality by {r}^{1/(p1)}(s) and integrating the resulting inequality from t to ι, \iota \ge t\ge {t}_{1}, we obtain
Passing to the limit as \iota \to \mathrm{\infty}, we conclude that
Hence, there exists a constant c>0 such that
Integrating (2.5) from {t}_{1} to t, we have
This yields
which contradicts (2.1). Next, integrating (2.5) from t to ∞, we get
Integrating again from {t}_{1} to t, we have
This implies that
which contradicts (2.2).
Case 2. Assume that (2) is satisfied and let \lambda \in (0,1) be an arbitrary constant. Then, there exists a {t}_{\lambda}\ge {t}_{1} such that, for all t\ge {t}_{\lambda}, z(\lambda \tau (t))>0. For t\ge {t}_{\lambda}, define
Then \omega (t)>0 for all t\ge {t}_{\lambda}, and
By virtue of Lemma 2.1, we have, for some constant M>0 and for all sufficiently large t,
Combining (2.7) and (2.8), we get
Recalling that {z}^{\prime}>0 and \sigma (t)\le t, we have
Then it follows from (1.1), (2.6), (2.9), and (2.10) that there exists a {t}_{3}\ge {t}_{\lambda} such that, for all t\ge {t}_{3},
Multiplying the latter inequality by H(t,s) and integrating the resulting inequality from {t}_{3} to t, we obtain
Now set
and
Letting \theta :=p/(p1) and using the inequality (see [22])
we have
Hence, we conclude by (2.11) that, for all sufficiently large t,
which contradicts (2.3).
Case 3. Assume that (3) is satisfied. We also have (2.10). By virtue of Lemma 2.2, we conclude that, for every constant k\in (0,1), there exists a {t}_{k}\ge {t}_{1} such that, for all t\ge {t}_{k},
Now define
Then \varphi (t)<0 for all t\ge {t}_{1}. It follows from (1.1), (2.10), (2.13), and (2.14) that there exists a {t}_{4}\ge {t}_{k} such that, for all t\ge {t}_{4},
Multiplying (2.15) by K(t,s) and integrating the resulting inequality from {t}_{4} to t, we obtain
Set
and
Letting \theta :=p/(p1) and using inequality (2.12), we have by (2.16) that, for all sufficiently large t,
which contradicts (2.4). This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.4 Choosing different combinations of functions H, ρ, K, and δ, one can derive from Theorem 2.3 a variety of efficient tests for oscillation of equation (1.1) and its particular cases.
3 Example and discussion
The following example illustrates applications of Theorem 2.3.
Example 3.1 For t\ge 1 and 0\le {a}_{0}<1, consider the fourthorder neutral differential equation
Let p=2, \tau (t)=t3\pi, \rho (t)=\delta (t)=1, and H(t,s)=K(t,s)={(ts)}^{2}. It is not difficult to verify that all assumptions of Theorem 2.3 are satisfied, and hence equation (3.1) is oscillatory. As a matter of fact, one such solution is x(t)=sint.
Remark 3.2 Oscillation theorem established in this paper for equation (1.1) complements, on one hand, results reported by Baculíková and Džurina [6], Karpuz [7], and Li et al. [9] because we use assumption (1.3) rather than (1.2) and, on the other hand, those by Li et al. [10] and Zhang et al. [16, 17, 19–21] since our theorem can be applied to the case where a(t)\ne 0.
Remark 3.3 We point out that, contrary to [[11], Theorem 2.2], Theorem 2.3 does not need restrictive conditions (1.4) and can ensure that all solutions of equation (1.1) oscillate, which, in a certain sense, is a significant improvement compared to [[11], Theorem 2.2] for fourthorder neutral differential equations.
Remark 3.4 It would be of interest to study equation (1.1) in the case where
for future research.
References
Aronsson G, Janfalk U: On HeleShaw flow of powerlaw fluids. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 1992, 3: 343366. 10.1017/S0956792500000905
Bartušek M, Cecchi M, Došlá Z, Marini M: Fourthorder differential equation with deviating argument. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 185242
Agarwal RP, Bohner M, Li WT: Nonoscillation and Oscillation: Theory for Functional Differential Equations. Dekker, New York; 2004.
Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D: Oscillation Theory for Difference and Functional Differential Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2000.
Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D: Oscillation criteria for certain n th order differential equations with deviating arguments. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2001, 262: 601622. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7571
Baculíková B, Džurina J: Oscillation theorems for higher order neutral differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219: 37693778. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.10.006
Karpuz B: Sufficient conditions for the oscillation and asymptotic behaviour of higherorder dynamic equations of neutral type. Appl. Math. Comput. 2013, 221: 453462.
Kiguradze IT, Chanturia TA: Asymptotic Properties of Solutions of Nonautonomous Ordinary Differential Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1993. Translated from the 1985 Russian original
Li T, Han Z, Zhao P, Sun S: Oscillation of evenorder neutral delay differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2010., 2010: Article ID 184180
Li T, Thandapani E, Tang S: Oscillation theorems for fourthorder delay dynamic equations on time scales. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 3: 190199.
Li T, Zhang C, Thandapani E: Asymptotic behavior of fourthorder neutral dynamic equations with noncanonical operators. Taiwan. J. Math. 2014. 10.11650/tjm.18.2014.2678
Parhi N, Tripathy AK: On oscillatory fourth order nonlinear neutral differential equations. I. Math. Slovaca 2004, 54: 389410.
Parhi N, Tripathy AK: On oscillatory fourth order nonlinear neutral differential equations. II. Math. Slovaca 2005, 55: 183202.
Philos ChG: A new criterion for the oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of delay differential equations. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. 1981, 39: 6164.
Thandapani E, Savitri R: Oscillation and nonoscillation of fourthorder nonlinear neutral differential equations. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2001, 32: 16311642.
Zhang C, Agarwal RP, Bohner M, Li T: New results for oscillatory behavior of evenorder halflinear delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2013, 26: 179183. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.08.004
Zhang C, Agarwal RP, Bohner M, Li T: Properties of higherorder halflinear functional differential equations with noncanonical operators. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 54
Zhang C, Agarwal RP, Li T: Oscillation and asymptotic behavior of higherorder delay differential equations with p Laplacian like operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014, 409: 10931106. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.066
Zhang C, Li T, Agarwal RP, Bohner M: Oscillation results for fourthorder nonlinear dynamic equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 20582065. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.04.018
Zhang C, Li T, Saker SH: Oscillation of fourthorder delay differential equations. Nonlinear Oscil. 2013, 16: 322335.
Zhang C, Li T, Sun B, Thandapani E: On the oscillation of higherorder halflinear delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 16181621. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.015
Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1988.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous referees for the careful reading of the original manuscript and useful comments that helped to improve the presentation of the results and accentuate important details. This research is supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of P.R. China (2013CB035604) and NNSF of P.R. China (Grant Nos. 61034007, 51277116, 51107069).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work. They all read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, T., Baculíková, B., Džurina, J. et al. Oscillation of fourthorder neutral differential equations with pLaplacian like operators. Bound Value Probl 2014, 56 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/16872770201456
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/16872770201456