- Open Access
Infinitely many weak solutions for a fractional Schrödinger equation
Boundary Value Problems volume 2014, Article number: 159 (2014)
In this paper we are concerned with the fractional Schrödinger equation , , where , , stands for the fractional Laplacian of order α, V is a positive continuous potential, and f is a continuous subcritical nonlinearity. We obtain the existence of infinitely many weak solutions for the above problem by the fountain theorem in critical point theory.
In this paper we consider the following fractional Schrödinger equation:
where , , stands for the fractional Laplacian of order α, and the potential is a continuous function satisfying
The nonlinearity is a continuous function, satisfying the subcritical condition.
(H1) There exist , and such that
where is the fractional critical exponent.
Recently, there have appeared plenty of works on the fractional Schrödinger equations; for example, see [–] and the references therein. In [], Shang and Zhang considered the critical fractional Schrödinger equation
where ε and λ are positive parameters, V and f satisfy (V) and (H1), respectively. They obtained the result that (1.2) has a nonnegative ground state solution and investigated the relation between the number of solutions and the topology of the set where V attains its minimum for all sufficiently large λ and small ε. In [], Shang et al. considered the existence of nontrivial solutions for (1.2) with , where .
In [], Hua and Yu studied the critical fractional Laplacian equation
where , , is a bounded domain. They obtained the result that the problem (1.3) possesses a nontrivial ground state solution for any .
(g1) is of class for some , and odd,
(g4) for some such that .
Inspired by the mentioned papers, we first establish a compact embedding lemma via a fractional Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality. Then by virtue of the fountain theorem in critical point theory, we get two existence results of infinitely many weak solutions for (1.1).
In this section we offer some preliminary results which enable us to obtain the main existence theorems. First, we collect some useful facts of the fractional order Sobolev spaces.
For any , the fractional Sobolev space is defined by
endowed with the norm
where is the so-called Gagliardo semi-norm of u. Let be the Schwartz space of rapidly decaying functions in , for any and , and let be defined as
The symbol P.V. stands for the Cauchy principal value, and is a dimensional constant that depends on N and α, precisely given by .
Indeed, the fractional Laplacian can be viewed as a pseudo-differential operator of symbol , as stated in the following.
Letandbe the fractional Laplacian operator defined by (2.1). Then for any,
where ℱ is the Fourier transform, i.e.,
Now we can see that an alternative definition of the fractional Sobolev space via the Fourier transform is as follows:
It can be proved that
As a result, the norms on ,
are all equivalent.
In this paper, in view of the presence of potential , we consider its subspace
We define the norm in E by
where . Moreover, by [], E is a Hilbert space with the inner product
The corresponding inner product is
Throughout out this paper, we will use the norm in E.
We say that is a weak solution of (1.1), if
E is continuously embedded intoforand compactly embedded intofor.
E is compactly embedded intoforwith.
By [], we know E is compactly embedded into , i.e., if there exists a sequence and such that weakly in E, passing to a subsequence if necessary, we have strongly in . Therefore, we only consider . In order to do this, we need the following fractional Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, see [, Corollary 2.3]. Let , , and . Then
Note that the dimension , we can take , and then whence as . Consequently, from (2.5) we have
Furthermore, note that (2.4); we see that
Then by (2.6) and , we find
Therefore, E is compactly embedded into for with , as required. This completes the proof. □
The functional associated with (1.1) is defined by
Now, we list our assumptions on f and F.
(H2) uniformly for .
(H3) There exist and such that and
(H4) for .
(H5) There exist , such that
(H6) for all .
Let , for all and . Then (H1), (H2), (H4), and (H6) hold. Moreover, we easily have and , so (H3) is satisfied.
However, we can see that does not satisfy the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition (see [, ()]):
(AR) there is a constant such that
Indeed, is impossible for all and .
Let and , for all and . Then (H1), (H2), (H4), and (H6) hold. Moreover, from , and (H5) holds.
Note that from Theorem 4 in [] we have (H4) and (H5) imply (H2).
(see [, Lemma 1])
Let (V) and (H1) hold. Thenand its derivative
Moreover, the critical points of J are weak solutions of (1.1).
Let be a real Banach space, . We say that J satisfies the () condition if any sequence such that and as has a convergent subsequence.
Let X be a Banach space equipped with the norm and , where for any . Set and .
Letbe a real reflexive Banach space, satisfies the () condition for anyand J is even. If for each sufficiently large, there existsuch that the following conditions hold:
then the functional J has an unbounded sequence of critical values, i.e., there exists a sequencesuch thatandas.
In the following, we will introduce a variant fountain theorem by Zou []. Let X and the subspace and be defined above. Consider the following -functional defined by
If the functional satisfies
(T1) maps bounded sets to bounded sets uniformly for, and, moreover, for all,
(T2) for all; moreover, oras,
(T3) there existsuch that
whereand. Moreover, for a.e. , there exists a sequencesuch that
As mentioned in [], E is a Hilbert space. Let be an orthonormal basis of E and define , , and , . Clearly, with for all .
Existence of weak solutions for (1.1)
Assume that (V), (H1)-(H4), and (H6) hold. Then (1.1) has infinitely many weak solutionssatisfying
We first prove that J satisfies the () condition for any . Let be a () sequence, i.e.,
which implies that
In what follows, we shall show that is bounded. Otherwise, up to a subsequence, is unbounded in E, and we may assume that as . We define the sequence by , . Clearly, and for any n. Going over, if necessary, to a subsequence, we may assume that
Suppose that in E. Dividing by in both sides of (2.7), noting that , we obtain
On the other hand, denote , by (H2), for all , and we find
If , using Fatou’s lemma, we obtain
This contradicts (3.4). Hence, has zero measure, i.e., a.e. in . Let such that
Then we claim is bounded. If , ; if , . Therefore, is bounded when . If for n large enough
where is a positive constant. But fixing any , we let . Note that from (H1) we see that there exist , such that
Then by (3.3) we have
Then for n large enough,
This also contradicts (3.5).
Now the sequence is bounded, as required. Next, we verify that has a convergent subsequence. Without loss of generality, we assume that
Combining this with (H1) and the Hölder inequality, we see
with the fact that when . Therefore, we prove that J satisfies the () condition for any .
Clearly, by (H6). It remains to prove that the conditions (i) and (ii) of Lemma 2.8 hold. Let with , where is defined in Remark 2.10. Then by Lemma 3.8 of [], as for the fact that .
Now for with , we obtain
Next we shall prove that, for any finite dimensional subspace , we have
Suppose the contrary. For some sequence with , there is a such that for all . Put and then . Up to a subsequence, assume that weakly in E. Since , in E, a.e. on , and . Denote , then and for a.e. , . It follows from (2.7) that
But, for large n, on account of F being nonnegative, (H2) and Fatou’s Lemma enable us to obtain
Combining this and (3.8), we can take , and thus . Until now, we have proved the functional J satisfies all the conditions of Lemma 2.8. Hence, J has an unbounded sequence of critical values, i.e., there exists a sequence such that and as . This completes the proof. □
We prove that there exists ( is determined in (H5)) such that
Indeed, by (3.6) we see
This, together with (H1), implies that
Clearly, (3.12) holds true with . In the following theorem, we make the following assumption instead of (V):
(V′): , , where in (3.12), β in (H5).Especially, by (V′), we obtain
Now, we define a class of functionals on E by
Assume that (V′), (H1), and (H4)-(H6) hold. Then (1.1) possesses infinitely many weak solutions.
We first prove that there exist a positive integer and two sequences as such that
where and are defined in Remark 2.10.
Step 1. We claim that (3.14) is true.
By (3.6) and (H4) we have
Since with , and from Theorem 3.1 we have
Let as . Then there exists such that , . Therefore,
Step 2. We show that (3.15) is true.
We apply the method in Lemma 2.6 of [] to verify the claim. First, we prove that there exists such that
There would otherwise exist a sequence such that
For each , let . Then , and
Passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume in E for some since is of finite dimension. We easily find . Consequently, there exists a constant such that
Indeed, if not, then we have
This leads to , contradicting . In view of and the equivalence of any two norms on , we have
For every , denote
Consequently, for n large enough, we find
Then by (3.17), we find
As is well known, (H5) implies (H2), and hence for any , there is a constant such that
where ε is determined in (3.17). Therefore,
Now for any , if we take , so is large enough, we have
Step 3. Clearly, implies that maps bounded sets to bounded sets uniformly for . In view of (H6), for all . Thus the condition (T1) of Lemma 2.9 holds. Besides, the condition (T2) of Lemma 2.9 holds for the fact that as and since . Evidently, Step 1 and Step 2 imply that the condition (T3) of Lemma 2.9 also holds for all . Consequently, Lemma 2.9 implies that for any and a.e. , there exists a sequence such that
Furthermore, we easily have , , where and as .
Claim 1. possesses a strong convergent subsequence in E, a.e. and . In fact, by the boundedness of , passing to a subsequence, as , we may assume in E. By the method of Theorem 3.1, we easily prove that strongly in E.
Thus, for each , we can choose such that for the sequence we have obtained a convergent subsequence, and passing again to a subsequence, we may assume
Thus we obtain
Claim 2. is bounded in E and has a convergent subsequence with the limit for all . For convenience, we set for all . Consequently, (3.12) and (H5) imply that
Therefore, is bounded in E. By Claim 1, we see that has a convergent subsequence, which converges to an element for all .
Hence, passing to the limit in (3.24), we see and , and . Since as , we get infinitely many nontrivial critical points of . Therefore (1.1) possesses infinitely many nontrivial solutions by Lemma 2.9. This completes the proof. □
Shang X, Zhang J: Ground states for fractional Schrödinger equations with critical growth. Nonlinearity 2014, 27: 187-207. 10.1088/0951-7715/27/2/187
Shang X, Zhang J, Yang Y:On fractional Schrödinger equation in with critical growth. J. Math. Phys. 2013., 54: 10.1063/1.4835355
Cabré X, Sire Y: Nonlinear equations for fractional Laplacians I: regularity, maximum principles, and Hamiltonian estimates. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 2014, 31: 23-53. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2013.02.001
Chang X: Ground state solutions of asymptotically linear fractional Schrödinger equations. J. Math. Phys. 2013., 54: 10.1063/1.4809933
Chang X, Wang Z: Ground state of scalar field equations involving a fractional Laplacian with general nonlinearity. Nonlinearity 2013, 26: 479-494. 10.1088/0951-7715/26/2/479
Secchi S:Ground state solutions for nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations in . J. Math. Phys. 2013., 54: 10.1063/1.4793990
Secchi, S: On fractional Schrödinger equations in ℝN without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition (2012) , [http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1210.0755]
Hua Y, Yu X: On the ground state solution for a critical fractional Laplacian equation. Nonlinear Anal. 2013, 87: 116-125. 10.1016/j.na.2013.04.005
Barrios B, Colorado E, de Pablo A, Sánchez U: On some critical problems for the fractional Laplacian operator. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 252: 6133-6162. 10.1016/j.jde.2012.02.023
Autuori G, Pucci P:Elliptic problems involving the fractional Laplacian in . J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 255: 2340-2362. 10.1016/j.jde.2013.06.016
Dipierro S, Pinamonti A: A geometric inequality and a symmetry result for elliptic systems involving the fractional Laplacian. J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 255: 85-119. 10.1016/j.jde.2013.04.001
Di Nezza E, Palatucci G, Valdinoci E: Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. 2012, 136: 521-573. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004
Hajaiej H, Yu X, Zhai Z: Fractional Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Hardy inequalities under Lorentz norms. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 396: 569-577. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.06.054
Wu X:Existence of nontrivial solutions and high energy solutions for Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equations in . Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2011, 12: 1278-1287. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.09.023
Ye Y, Tang C:Multiple solutions for Kirchhoff-type equations in . J. Math. Phys. 2013., 54: 10.1063/1.4819249
Zou W: Variant fountain theorems and their applications. Manuscr. Math. 2001, 104: 343-358. 10.1007/s002290170032
Struwe M: Variational Methods, Applications to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, New York; 2000.
Ambrosetti A, Rabinowitz P: Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications. J. Funct. Anal. 1973, 14: 349-381. 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7
Willem M: Minimax Theorems. Birkhäuser, Boston; 1996.
Zhang Q, Xu B: Multiplicity of solutions for a class of semilinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing potential. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 377: 834-840. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.11.059
The authors are highly grateful for the referees’ careful reading of this paper and their comments. Supported by the NNSF-China (11371117), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2013AM009) and Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (A2012402036).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
WD and JX obtained the results in a joint research. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, W., Xu, J. & Wei, Z. Infinitely many weak solutions for a fractional Schrödinger equation. Bound Value Probl 2014, 159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0159-6
- fractional Laplacian
- subcritical nonlinearity
- fountain theorem
- weak solution