- Open Access
On quasi-periodic solutions to a higher-order Emden-Fowler type differential equation
© Astashova; licensee Springer. 2014
- Received: 5 February 2014
- Accepted: 30 June 2014
- Published: 25 September 2014
The paper is devoted to the existence of oscillatory and non-oscillatory quasi-periodic, in some sense, solutions to a higher-order Emden-Fowler type differential equation.
- Emden-Fowler type equation
- quasi-periodic solutions
- oscillatory and non-oscillatory solutions
The fact of the existence of such solutions answers the two questions posed by IT Kiguradze:
Can we describe more precisely qualitative properties of oscillatory solutions to (1)?
Do all blow-up solutions to this equation (and similarly all Kneser solutions) have the power asymptotic behavior?
A lot of results on the asymptotic behavior of solutions to (1) are described in detail in . In particular (see Ch. IV, §15), the existence of oscillatory solutions to a generalization of this equation was proved (see also  Ch. I, §6.1). In  a result was formulated on non-extensibility of oscillatory solutions to (1) with odd n and . In the cases and the asymptotic behavior of all oscillatory solutions is described in –. Some results on the existence of blow-up solutions are in  (Ch. IV, §16),  (Ch. I, §5), , . Some results on the existence of some special solutions to this equation are in , , , , –.
In this section some results will be obtained on the existence of special oscillatory solutions. The main results of this section were formulated in .
satisfying the initial conditions with .
For put and .
and satisfying the equality for all .
for all ,
For anythere existssuch thatandfor all.
Put . This J exists and is positive due to the definition of Q. On some interval all derivatives with are positive. Those with , due to (3), are negative on the same interval.
While keeping this sign combination, the function and its derivatives are bounded, which provides extensibility of as the solution to (3) outside the interval .
On the other hand, this sign combination cannot take place up to +∞. Indeed, in that case would increase providing for all , which is impossible for any positive function on the unbounded interval .
So, must change the sign combination of its derivatives. The only possible combination to be the next one corresponds to the positive derivatives with and the negative ones with .
The same arguments show that the new sign combination must also change and finally, after J changes, we arrive at the case with and with . Now, contrary to the previous cases, the function does not increase, but its first derivative is negative and decreases (recall that ). Hence this sign combination also cannot take place on an unbounded interval and therefore it must change to the case with all negative , . By the way, the function must vanish at some point , which completes the proof of Lemma 1. □
Note that is not only the first positive zero of , but the only positive one. Indeed, all with are negative at , whence, according to (3), all with decrease and are negative for all in the domain of .
is the ‘solution’ mapping defined on a domain including . The necessary for the implicit function theorem condition is satisfied since the left-hand side of the last inequality is equal to . Besides, any function implicitly defined near a point must be positive in some its neighborhood. Hence locally must be equal to , but neither to a non-positive zero of nor to a non-first positive one, which does not exist. Hence the function is continuous as well as .
Now we can consider the mapping , which maps Q into itself. Since is continuous and Q is homeomorphic to a convex compact subset of , the Brouwer fixed-point theorem can be applied. Thus, there exists such that .
So, the function is a solution to (7) and is defined on the segment with .
where and hence .
Now we will investigate whether b is greater or less than 1.
since and on the interval , where only itself changes its sign, while all other with keep the same one. Recall that , which makes to be one of these others. Inequality (9) is proved.
Inequality (10) follows from on the interval , where the derivatives and with keep different signs, while all lower-order derivatives keep the same sign as . □
From the lemma proved it follows that , whence it follows that and .
So, for all and hence the function is periodic with period .
Now, according to (11), we can express the solution to (7) just as . Multiplying it by we obtain a solution to (3) having the form needed. It still will be a solution to (3) after replacing by arbitrary . □
The substitution produces the following.
is a solution to (1).
for someand, whereandare sequences satisfying, , if, if.
With the help of this theorem, another one can be proved, namely the following.
where and h is a positive periodic non-constant function on R.
where h is a positive periodic non-constant function on R.
Still it was not clear how large n should be for the existence of that type of positive solutions.
whereandare periodic positive non-constant functions on R.
Computer calculations give approximate values of α. They are, with the corresponding values of k, as follows:
if , then , ;
if , then , ;
if , then , .
with periodic positive non-constant functionson R.
So, we give the negative answer to Question 1 and prove the existence of oscillatory solutions with special qualitative properties for Question 2.
It would be interesting to know if positive solutions like (12) exist for and for .
If a positive solution like (12) exists for some , does it follow, for the same n, that such solutions exist for all ?
The research was supported by RFBR (grant 11-01-00989).
- Kiguradze IT, Chanturia TA: Asymptotic Properties of Solutions of Nonautonomous Ordinary Differential Equations. Kluver Academic, Dordreht; 1993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astashova, IV: Qualitative properties of solutions to quasilinear ordinary differential equations. In: Astashova, IV (ed.) Qualitative Properties of Solutions to Differential Equations and Related Topics of Spectral Analysis: scientific edition, M.: UNITY-DANA, pp. 22-290 (2012) (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Kondratiev VA, Samovol VS: On some asymptotic properties to solutions for the Emden-Fowler type equations. Differ. Uravn. 1981, 17(4):749-750. (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Astashova, IV: On the asymptotic behavior of the oscillating solutions for some nonlinear differential equations of the third and fourth order. In: Reports of the Extended Sessions of the I. N. Vekua Institute of Applied Mathematics, 3(3), 9-12, Tbilisi (1988) (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Astashova IV: Application of dynamical systems to the study of asymptotic properties of solutions to nonlinear higher-order differential equations. J. Math. Sci. 2005, 126(5):1361-1391. 10.1007/s10958-005-0066-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astashova, I: On Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions to a Forth Order Nonlinear Differential Equation. In: Mathematical Methods in Finance and Business Administration. Proceedings of the 1st WSEAS International Conference on Pure Mathematics (PUMA ’14), Tenerife, Spain, January 10-12, pp. 32-41 (2014). ISBN:978-960-474-360-5Google Scholar
- Astashova, IV: Asymptotic behavior of solutions of certain nonlinear differential equations. In: Reports of Extended Session of a Seminar of the I. N. Vekua Institute of Applied Mathematics, 1(3), 9-11, Tbilisi (1985) (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Kiguradze IT: Blow-up Kneser solutions of nonlinear higher-order differential equations. Differ. Equ. 2001, 31(6):768-777. 10.1023/A:1019282318238MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kiguradze IT: An oscillation criterion for a class of ordinary differential equations. Differ. Equ. 1992, 28(2):180-190.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kiguradze IT, Kusano T: On periodic solutions of even-order ordinary differential equations. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 2001, 180(3):285-301. 10.1007/s102310100012MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozlov VA: On Kneser solutions of higher order nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Ark. Mat. 1999, 37(2):305-322. 10.1007/BF02412217MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kusano T, Manojlovic J: Asymptotic behavior of positive solutions of odd order Emden-Fowler type differential equations in the framework of regular variation. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2012., 2012: 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-45Google Scholar
- Astashova IV: On power and non-power asymptotic behavior of positive solutions to Emden-Fowler type higher-order equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013.Google Scholar
- Astashova I: On existence of quasi-periodic solutions to a nonlinear higher-order differential equation. Abstracts of International Workshop on the Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 2013, 16-18. [http://www.rmi.ge/eng/QUALITDE-2013/Astashova_workshop_2013.pdf] http://www.rmi.ge/eng/QUALITDE-2013/Astashova_workshop_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.