Open Access

Global well-posedness for nonlinear fourth-order Schrödinger equations

Boundary Value Problems20162016:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0534-6

Received: 12 August 2015

Accepted: 17 January 2016

Published: 27 January 2016

Abstract

This paper studies a class of nonlinear fourth-order Schrödinger equations. By constructing a variational problem and the so-called invariant of some sets, we get global existence and nonexistence of the solutions.

Keywords

fourth-order Schrödinger equations blow up global existence

MSC

35Q55 35B44 35A01

1 Introduction

This paper concerns the initial value problems for the nonlinear fourth-order Schrödinger equations
$$\begin{aligned} \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} i\partial_{t}u+\Delta^{2}u=|u|^{p}u,\\ u(0, x)=u_{0}(x),\quad x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(1.1)
where \(0< p<\frac{8}{(n-4)^{+}}\) (we use the convention: \(\frac {8}{(n-4)^{+}}=+\infty\) when \(2\leq n\leq4\); \(\frac{8}{(n-4)^{+}}=\frac {8}{n-4}\) when \(n\geq5\)), \(u(t,x):\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb {R}^{n}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}\), \(n\geq2\), is the unknown function and Δ is the Laplace operator, \(t\in[0,+\infty)\).
Problem (1.1) was first introduced by Karpman [1]. Karpman and Shagalov [2] considered the conditions for existence and stability of solutions about the fourth-order Schrödinger equation
$$\begin{aligned} i\partial_{t}\Psi+\frac{1}{2}\Delta\Psi+ \frac{1}{2}\gamma\Delta^{2}\Psi +|\Psi|^{2p}\Psi=0, \end{aligned}$$
(1.2)
where p is an integer and
$$\begin{aligned} p\geq1, \quad \Delta=\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha}, \quad \alpha=1, \ldots,n, n=1,2,3. \end{aligned}$$
Pausader [3] established the global well-posedness for the energy critical fourth-order Schrödinger equation
$$\begin{aligned} i\partial_{t} u+\Delta^{2}u+\varepsilon\Delta u+f\bigl(|u|^{2}\bigr)u=0 \end{aligned}$$
(1.3)
in the radial case by Strichartz-type estimates, while a specific nonlinear fourth-order Schrödinger equation as above (1.3) had been recently discussed by Fibich et al. [4]. They described various properties of the equation in the subcritical regime.
Moreover, for \(f(|u|^{2})u=|u|^{p-1}u\) one could also consider the focusing equation
$$\begin{aligned} i\partial_{t} u+\Delta^{2}u-\varepsilon\Delta u-|u|^{p-1}u=0 \end{aligned}$$
and proved that the solutions blow up in finite time for large data [5, 6].
Motivated by the above works, Pausader and Xia [7] proved the scattering theory for the defocusing fourth-order Schrödinger equation
$$\begin{aligned} \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} i\partial_{t}u+\Delta^{2}u-\varepsilon\Delta u+|u|^{p-1}u=0, \\ u(0)=u_{0}\in H^{2}_{x}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
in low spatial dimensions (\(1\leq n \leq4\)) by a virial-type estimate and Morawetz-type estimate.
Recently, Wang [8] proved the small data scattering and large data local well-posedness for the fourth-order nonlinear problem
$$\begin{aligned} \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{@{}l} i\partial_{t}u+\Delta^{2}u=\mu|u|^{p}u, \\ u(0, x)=u_{0}(x), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(1.4)
where \(\mu=\pm1\), in critical \(H^{s_{c}}\) space and in particular, for some \(s_{c} \leq0\) by Fourier restriction theory and Strichartz-type estimates, but the sharp conditions of the global existence and blow up for the problem by potential well theory is still not considered for \(\mu=1\). In this paper we try to solve this problem by a concavity method and potential well theory. Recently, the concavity method and potential well theory were applied by Shen et al. [9] to study the initial boundary value problem for fourth-order wave equations with nonlinear strain and source terms at high energy level. For other related results, we refer the reader to [1018].

The plan of this paper is as follows. In the second section, we state some propositions, lemmas, and definitions and prove some invariant sets. In the third section, we state the sharp condition for the global existence and nonexistence of problem (1.1).

Throughout this paper, the \(H^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\)-norm will be designated by \(\|\cdot\|_{H^{2}}\), also, the \(L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\)-norm will be denoted by \(\|\cdot\|_{L^{p}}\) (if \(p=2\), \(\|\cdot\|_{L^{2}}\) is denoted \(\|\cdot\|\)). For simplicity, hereafter, \(\int_{\mathbb {R}^{n}}\cdot\,dx\) is denoted ∫.

2 Preliminaries

For problem (1.1), we define the energy space in the course of nature by
$$\begin{aligned} H= \biggl\{ u\in H^{2}\bigl(\mathbb{R}^{n}\bigr) \Big| \int|x|^{2}|u|^{2}< \infty \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$
(2.1)

Proposition 2.1

([19, 20])

Let \(u_{0}\in H\). Then there exists a unique solution u of the Cauchy problem (1.1) in \(C([0, T]; H)\) for some \(T\in(0,\infty]\) (maximal existence time). Furthermore, we can get alternatives: \(T =\infty\) or \(T<\infty\) and
$$\lim_{t\rightarrow T}\|u\|_{H^{2}}=\infty. $$
Moreover, u satisfies
$$\begin{aligned}& \int|u|^{2}= \int|u_{0}|^{2}, \end{aligned}$$
(2.2)
$$\begin{aligned}& E(t)=\frac{1}{2} \int \biggl(|\Delta u|^{2}-\frac{2}{p+2}|u|^{p+2} \biggr)\equiv E(0). \end{aligned}$$
(2.3)

From [19, 20], we can get the following lemma.

Lemma 2.2

Suppose \(u_{0}\in H\), \(u\in C([0,T); H)\) be a solution to problem (1.1). Let \(J(t)=\int|x|^{2}|u|^{2}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} J^{''}(t)=8 \int \biggl(|\Delta u|^{2}-\frac{np}{2(p+2)}|u|^{p+2} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(2.4)
Furthermore, we consider the following steady-state equation:
$$\begin{aligned} -\Delta^{2}\varphi+\varphi+\varphi|\varphi|^{p}=0, \quad \varphi\in H. \end{aligned}$$
(2.5)
For any solution of (2.5), we define the following functionals:
$$\begin{aligned} &P(\varphi)=\frac{1}{2} \int \biggl(|\Delta\varphi|^{2}-|\varphi|^{2}- \frac {2}{p+2}|\varphi|^{p+2} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(2.6)
$$\begin{aligned} &I(\varphi)= \int \bigl(|\Delta\varphi|^{2}-|\varphi|^{2}-| \varphi|^{p+2} \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(2.7)
When \(\varphi_{0}\in H\) and φ are a solution of problem (1.1) in \(C([0,T]; H)\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi)\equiv P(\varphi_{0}), \end{aligned}$$
(2.8)
and we define the set
$$M=\bigl\{ \varphi\in H\setminus\{0\}|I(\varphi)=0\bigr\} . $$
Now, we study the following constrained variational problem:
$$\begin{aligned} d=\inf_{\varphi\in M}P(\varphi). \end{aligned}$$
(2.9)

By a similar argument to [21], we get the following lemmas.

Lemma 2.3

Solution of (2.5) belongs to M.

Proof

Let \(\varphi(x)\) be a solution of steady-state equation (2.5). Then we get
$$\begin{aligned} \int\bigl(|\Delta\varphi|^{2}-|\varphi|^{2}-| \varphi|^{p+2}\bigr)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(2.10)
from which
$$I(\varphi)=0. $$
Hence \(\varphi\in M\). □

Lemma 2.4

When \(\varphi(x)\in M\), we have \(d>0\).

Proof

By (2.6) and (2.7), on M we get
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi)=\frac{p}{2(p+2)} \int|\varphi|^{p+2}. \end{aligned}$$
(2.11)
Combined with (2.9), we obtain the conclusion. □

Lemma 2.5

Let \(\varphi\in H \), \(\lambda>0\), and \(\varphi_{\lambda}(x)=\lambda \varphi(x)\). Then there exists a unique \(\lambda^{*}>0\) (depending on φ) such that \(I(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})=0\) and \(I(\varphi _{\lambda})>0\), for \(\lambda\in(0, \mu)\); \(I(\varphi_{\lambda})<0\), for \(\lambda>\lambda^{*}\). Furthermore, \(P(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})\geq P(\varphi_{\lambda})\), for any \(\lambda>0\).

Proof

From \(\varphi_{\lambda}=\lambda\varphi\), (2.6) and (2.7), we have
$$\begin{aligned} I(\varphi_{\lambda})=\lambda^{2} \int \bigl(|\Delta\varphi|^{2}-|\varphi |^{2}- \lambda^{p}|\varphi|^{p+2} \bigr) \end{aligned}$$
(2.12)
and
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi_{\lambda})=\frac{\lambda^{2}}{2} \int \bigl(|\Delta\varphi |^{2}-|\varphi|^{2} \bigr)- \frac{\lambda^{p+2}}{p+2} \int|\varphi |^{p+2}. \end{aligned}$$
(2.13)
Furthermore, there exists a unique positive constant \(\lambda^{*}>0\) (depending on φ) such that \(I(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}}) = 0\) and we can easily see that
$$\begin{aligned} I(\varphi_{\lambda})>0 \quad\mbox{for } \lambda\in\bigl(0, \lambda^{*}\bigr) \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} I(\varphi_{\lambda})< 0 \quad\mbox{for } \lambda>\lambda^{*}. \end{aligned}$$
Combining
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d}{d\lambda}P(\varphi_{\lambda})=\lambda^{-1}I( \varphi_{\lambda}) \end{aligned}$$
with
$$\begin{aligned} I(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})=0, \end{aligned}$$
we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})\geq P(\varphi_{\lambda}), \quad\mbox{for any } \lambda>0. \end{aligned}$$
This completes the proof of the lemma. □

Now we discuss the invariant sets of solution for problem (1.1).

Theorem 2.6

Let
$$\begin{aligned} V=\bigl\{ \varphi\in H\setminus\{0\} |P(\varphi)< d,I(\varphi)< 0 \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
(2.14)
If \(u_{0}\in V\), then the solution \(u(x,t)\) of problem (1.1) also belongs to V for any t in the interval \([0, T)\).

Notice that on the basis of Theorem 2.6 one says that V is an invariant set of problem (1.1).

Proof

Let \(u_{0}\in V\). By Proposition 2.1 there exists a unique \(u(x, t)\in C([0, T); H)\) with \(T<\infty\) such that \(u(x, t)\) is a solution of problem (1.1). As (2.8) shows,
$$\begin{aligned} P(u) = P(u_{0}), \quad t \in[0, T). \end{aligned}$$
It means that \(P(u_{0})< d\) is equivalent to \(P(u)< d\) for any \(t\in[0, T)\).
If \(u_{0}\in V\), then we have \(u\in V\) for \(t\in[0,T)\). Indeed, if it was false, there exists a first time \(t_{1}\in(0,T)\) such that \(I(u(x, t_{1})) = 0\). By (2.6), (2.7), and
$$\begin{aligned} P \bigl(u (x, t_{1} ) \bigr)>0, \end{aligned}$$
we have \(u(x, t_{1}) \neq0\). Otherwise \(P(u(x, t_{1})) = 0\), which contradicts \(P(u(x, t_{1}))> 0\). From (2.9), it follows that \(P(u(x, t_{1}))\geq d\). This contradicts \(P(u(x, t)) < d\) for any \(t\in[0, T)\), since \(I(u(x, t)) < 0\). In other words, \(u(x, t) \in V\) for any \(t\in[0, T)\). So, V is an invariant manifold of (1.1). □

By a proof similar to that of Theorem 2.6, we can obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.7

Define
$$\begin{aligned} W=\bigl\{ \varphi\in H\setminus\{0\} |P(\varphi)< d,I(\varphi)>0 \bigr\} \cup\{0\}, \end{aligned}$$
(2.15)
Then W is an invariant set of problem (1.1).

3 The conditions for global well-posedness

Theorem 3.1

(Global existence)

Let \(u_{0}\in W\), then the existence time of solution \(u(x,t)\) for problem (1.1) is infinite.

Proof

If \(u_{0}\in W\), from Theorem 2.7, we know that \(u(x, t)\in W\) for \(t\in[0, T)\). For fixed \(t\in[0, T)\), we denote \(u(x, t) = u\). Then we have \(P(u) < d\), \(I(u) > 0\). It follows from (2.6) and (2.7) that
$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{p+2} \biggr) \int \bigl(|\Delta u|^{2}-|u|^{2} \bigr) \\ &\quad< \frac{1}{2} \int \biggl(|\Delta u|^{2}-|u|^{2}- \frac{2}{p+2}|u|^{p+2} \biggr) < d, \end{aligned}$$
which indicates
$$\begin{aligned} \int\bigl(|\Delta u|^{2}-|u|^{2}\bigr)< \frac{2(p+2)}{p}d. \end{aligned}$$
(3.1)
From Proposition 2.1 and (3.1), we know that u globally exists on \(t \in[0,\infty)\).

Let \(u_{0} = 0\). From (2.2), we have \(u = 0\), which shows that u is a trivial solution of problem (1.1). □

Lemma 3.2

Assume that \(\varphi\in H\) and \(\lambda^{*}>0\) satisfy \(I(\varphi _{\lambda^{*}}) = 0\). Suppose \(\lambda^{*}<1\), then it follows that
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi)-P(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})\geq\frac{1}{2}I( \varphi). \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)

Proof

From the proof of Lemma 2.5 we know
$$\begin{aligned} &I(\varphi_{\lambda})=a\lambda^{2}-b \lambda^{p+2}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.3)
$$\begin{aligned} &P(\varphi_{\lambda})=a\frac{\lambda^{2}}{2}-b\frac{\lambda ^{p+2}}{p+2}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.4)
where \(a=\int(|\Delta\varphi|^{2}+|\varphi|^{2})\), \(b=\int|\varphi|^{p+2}\).
Notice that \(I(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}}) = 0\) requires
$$\begin{aligned} a{\lambda^{*}}^{2}=b{\lambda^{*}}^{p+2}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.5)
Observe that \(\varphi= \varphi_{\lambda^{*}=1}\) and \(I(\varphi) = a -b\), using (3.5), we get
$$\begin{aligned} P(\varphi)-P(\varphi_{\lambda^{*}})=\frac{1}{2}I(\varphi)+ \frac {bp}{2(p+2)}\bigl(1-{\lambda^{*}}^{p+2}\bigr), \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)
and the result of Lemma 3.2 is obtained from (3.6) since \(\lambda^{*}<1\) and \(0< p<\frac {8}{n-4} \). Lemma 3.2 is proved. □

Theorem 3.3

(Blow up in finite time)

Let \(p>1\), \(n>\frac{2(p+2)}{p}\), \(u_{0}\in V\), \(E(0)< d\), then any solution \(u(x, t)\) to problem (1.1) blows up in finite time.

Proof

Since \(u_{0}\in V\), for \(t\in[0,T)\), from Theorem 2.6 we have \(u(x,t)\in V\), i.e., \(I(u)<0\). Then we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} I(u)< 0, \qquad P(u)< d, \quad t\in[0,T). \end{aligned}$$
(3.7)
Since \(u_{0}\in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\), \(u\in L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\), by Lemma 2.2 it follows that
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}} \int|x|^{2}|u|^{2}\leq8 \biggl(I(u)+ \int|u_{0}|^{2} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.8)
For fixed \(t\in[0,T)\), \(u=u(t)\). Let \(\lambda^{*}>0\) be such that
$$\begin{aligned} I(u_{\lambda^{*}})=0. \end{aligned}$$
Since \(I(u)<0\), we know from Lemma 2.5 that \(\lambda^{*}<1\). Because
$$\begin{aligned} P\bigl(u_{\lambda}^{*}\bigr)\geq d, \qquad P(u)=P(u_{0}). \end{aligned}$$
By Lemma 3.2, we get
$$\begin{aligned} I(u)\leq2\bigl(P(u_{0})-d\bigr)< 0. \end{aligned}$$
(3.9)
By (2.8), (2.9), and \(E(0)< d\), it follows that
$$\begin{aligned} J''(t)&=\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}} \int|x|^{2}|u|^{2} \\ &\leq8 \biggl(2\bigl(P(u_{0})-d\bigr)+ \int|u_{0}|^{2} \biggr) \\ &=-16d+8 \int \biggl(|\Delta u_{0}|^{2}-|u_{0}|^{2}- \frac{2}{p+2}|u_{0}|^{p+2} \biggr)+8 \int|u_{0}|^{2} \\ &=-16d+16E(0) \\ &=-c_{0},\quad 0\leq t< T, \end{aligned}$$
(3.10)
where \(c_{0}\) is a positive constant. Furthermore, we can get
$$J'(t)\leq-c_{0}t+J'(0), \quad 0\leq t< T. $$
Hence there exists a \(t_{0}\geq0\), such that \(J'(t)< J'(0)<0\) for \(t>t_{0}\) and
$$\begin{aligned} J(t)< J'(t_{0}) (t-t_{0})+J(t_{0}), \quad t_{0} < t< T, \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)
since \(J(0)>0\) (by \(I(u_{0})<0\)). From (3.11), we know that there exists a \(T_{1}>0\) such that \(J(t)>0\) for \(t\in[0,T_{1})\),
$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{t\rightarrow T_{1}}J(t)=0. \end{aligned}$$
(3.12)
From (3.12), the Hölder inequality, and the Hardy inequality, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \|u_{0}\|^{2}=\|u\|^{2}&= \int\frac{|u|}{|x|}|x||u| \\ &\geq \biggl( \int\frac{|u|^{2}}{|x|^{2}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \biggl( \int |x|^{2}|u|^{2} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ &\geq C\|\nabla u\|J^{\frac{1}{2}}{t}, \end{aligned}$$
and it follows that
$$\lim_{t\rightarrow T}\bigl\| \nabla u(t)\bigr\| =\infty, $$
which contradicts \(T= +\infty\). Finally, we can get
$$\lim_{t\rightarrow T}\bigl\| u(t)\bigr\| _{H^{2}}=+\infty. $$
i.e. the solution of problem (1.1) blows up in finite time. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41306086), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Many thanks go to the reviewers for their revision suggestions, which improved the paper a lot. The authors appreciate Prof. Weike Wang for his valuable suggestions.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University
(2)
College of Science, Harbin Engineering University
(3)
Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University

References

  1. Karpman, VI: Lyapunov approach to the soliton stability in highly dispersive systems. I. Fourth order nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Phys. Lett. A 215, 254-256 (1996) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Karpman, VI, Shagalov, AG: Stability of solitons described by nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations with higher-order dispersion. Physica D 144, 194-210 (2000) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Pausader, B: Global well-posedness for energy critical fourth-order Schrödinger equations in the radial case. Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 4, 197-225 (2007) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Fibich, G, Ilan, B, Papanicolaou, G: Self-focusing with fourth order dispersion. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 64, 1437-1462 (2002) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Baruch, G, Fibich, G, Mandelbaum, E: Singular solutions of the biharmonic nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70, 3319-3341 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Baruch, G, Fibich, G: Singular solutions of the L2-supercritical biharmonic nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinearity 24, 1843-1859 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Pausader, B, Xia, SX: Scattering theory for the fourth-order Schrödinger equation in low dimensions. Nonlinear Anal. 26, 2175-2191 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang, YZ: Nonlinear four-order Schrödinger equations with radial data. Nonlinear Anal. 75, 2534-2541 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Shen, JH, Yang, YB, Chen, SH, Xu, RZ: Finite time blow up of fourth-order wave equations with nonlinear strain and source terms at high energy level. Int. J. Math. 24, 1350043 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhu, SH, Yang, H, Zhang, J: Blow-up of rough solutions to the fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 6186-6201 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhu, SH, Zhang, J, Yang, H: Biharmonic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and the profile decomposition. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 6244-6255 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, RX, Tian, B, Liu, LC, Qin, B, Lü, X: Bilinear forms, N-soliton solution sand soliton interactions for a fourth-order dispersive nonlinear Schrödinger equation in condensed-matter physics and biophysics. Physica B 413, 120-125 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Payne, LE, Sattinger, DH: Saddle points and instability of nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Isr. J. Math. 22, 273-303 (1975) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Levine, HA: Instability and nonexistence of global solutions to nonlinear wave equations of the form \(Pu_{tt}=-Au+F(u)\). Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 192, 1-21 (1974) MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, YC, Zhao, JS: On potential wells and applications to semilinear hyperbolic equations and parabolic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 64, 2665-2687 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, YC, Xu, RZ: Potential well method for Cauchy problem of generalized double dispersion equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, 1169-1187 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, YC, Xu, RZ: Fourth order wave equations with nonlinear strain and source terms. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 331, 585-607 (2007) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu, RZ, Liu, YC: Ill-posedness of nonlinear parabolic equation with critical initial condition. Math. Comput. Simul. 82, 1363-1374 (2012) View ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato, T: On nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Ann. IHP, Phys. Théor. 46, 113-129 (1987) MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Cazenave, T: Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, vol. 10. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2003) MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang, XL, Yang, YB, Xu, RZ: Family potential wells and its applications to NLS with harmonic potential. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 6, 155-165 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peng et al. 2016