Entropy solution of fractional dynamic cloud computing system associated with finite boundary condition
- Rabha W Ibrahim^{1}Email author,
- Hamid A Jalab^{1} and
- Abdullah Gani^{1}
Received: 21 February 2016
Accepted: 28 April 2016
Published: 4 May 2016
Abstract
Cloud computing is relevant for the applications transported as services over the hardware and for the Internet and systems software in the datacenters that deliver those services. The major problem for this state is computing the capacity and the amplitude of the dynamic system of these services. In this effort, we process an algorithm based on fractional differential stochastic equation (fractional Fokker-Planck equation (FFPE)) to find the fractional entropy solutions. Our tool is based on Mellin-Laplace transforms. Also, we suggest a fractional functional entropy formula by using the Tsallis entropy. Approximate outcomes are illustrated and discussed. The convergence of the method is investigated.
Keywords
1 Introduction
Fractional calculus has many applications, not only in mathematics, but in other sciences, engineering, economics, and social studies. It covenants with differential and integral operators involving arbitrary powers; real and complex. It is associated with many well-known names such as Abel, Caputo, Euler, Grunwald, Hadamard, Hardy, Heaviside, Jumarie, Laplace, Leibniz, Letnikov, Liouville, Riemann, Riesz, and Weyl. The central purpose, or, at least, one of the chief purposes in considering and studying fractional calculus, is the circumstance that fractional calculus appears to be fairly significant in the investigation of some problems which arise in fractal space-time physics. We have physical schemes at three unalike stages of thought: microscopic, megascopic, and macroscopic. The fractional calculus approximates the classical calculus, and it includes non-commutative derivatives, which appears to be fairly reliable on using non-commutative geometry. This development leads one to generalize the information theory of fractional order. The books of Oldham and Spanier [1], Srivastava and Owa [2], Oustaloup [3], Miller and Ross [4], Samko et al. [5], Kiryakova [6], Mainardi [7], Podlubny [8], Hilfer [9], Zaslavsky [10], Kilbas et al. [11], Magin [12], Sabatier et al. [13], Hilfer [14], Mainardi [15], Monje et al. [16], Klafter et al. [17], Tarasov [18], Baleanu et al. [19], Yang [20], Jumarie [21, 22], etc. have enriched all areas of applied sciences. However, certain mathematical problems remain and baffle us. The complications and most of the recognized key mathematical problems in the field have been determined up to a point. There were practically no applied formulations of requirements in different areas. The developments in these areas continue [1–22]. The central substantial advantage of fabricating a procedure of fractional differential equations (ordinary and partial) in scientific modeling is their nonlocal property. It is recognized that the normal derivative is a local, linear operator, while the fractional derivative is nonlocal and non-linear. As a result the subsequent formulation of a system is predisposed by not only its current formal feature, but consistently by all of its preceding ones.
The theory of entropy was introduced in the area of thermodynamics in the 19th century and was utilized by Shannon to improve the information theory. Entropy is a conventional statistic computing concept, showing uniformity and complexity, which achieves promising applications to a widespread variety of reasonable and noisy time series data. The development was motivated by data length restraints that are commonly challenging. Investigators stressed its employment and amplification, and its utility to differentiate associated stochastic processes and models. They deliberated its impact and are stimulated to apply it in a statistically usable manner, such as marginal probability distributions and other methods. The major outcome is that the density of information so convoluted is formulated by the derivative of the function or its fractional derivative, depending upon whether it is differentiable or not. As regards information theory, one may compare the perspectives between the probability density and the derivative of a function. Fractional entropy appeared due to Tsallis (1988) (see [23]). Many investigators published different studies to improve this concept (see [24–32]).
Recently, cloud computing (CC) has developed as one of the newest and most general network computing models in various areas, such as academic circles, governments, information industry, etc. It is now essential for the new compeers information technology modification, and it expresses the progress of great scales, increasing focus on the relevance in IT studies. In an environment of CC, data is stockpiled on the cloud and manipulators can attain the influential computing capability from the cloud, devoid of getting those costly substructures. A manipulator would purchase the service of CC and attain demand as extended as suggested to the cloud service supplier and paying the lowest price. The experimental results show that the entropy is the best method to select the service of CC (see [32, 33]). This study leads to the probability capacity and the amplitude of the dynamic system of these services.
In this work, we develop an algorithm based on the fractional differential stochastic equation (FFPE) to find the fractional entropy solutions. These solutions are employed to compute the capacity and the amplitude of fractional dynamic systems. Our tool is based on the Mellin-Laplace transforms. Moreover, we propose the fractional functional entropy formulated by the Tsallis concept of entropy. Numerical results are presented for illustration. The convergence of the method is investigated.
2 Processing
Our approach deals with the following concepts.
2.1 The fractional Fokker-Planck equation (FFPE)
2.2 The fractional entropy
2.3 The fractional transform
2.4 The entropy system
The cloud computing entropy system can be constructed as a multi-agent system. Therefore, it must deal with the world’s natural affinity to ailment. Various applications involve a set of agents that are independently autonomous. In this case, each agent concludes its activities established by its own formula, capacity, and the environment. Typically, agents deliberately openly recognize one another additionally, aim approximately at this sensitivity, and then perform a sensible action. In the FFPE model assessment, coordination as an organism is referred to by the environment; agents undergo modification by the capacity of the system. Procedures in the environment produce assemblies that the agents recognize, thus authorizing ordered performance at the agent level. Naturally, these procedures increase ailment and chaos at the agent level, so that the system converts to being less ordered over time. Entropy introduces a good concept describing such a system. The minimization method for circumventing discreteness agents has the consequence of choosing at each time step the capacity that best centers on the agents. Thus, the state of the asymptotic system completely depends on the entropy solution of the FFPE model. We aim to study and determine the global behavior (self-organization) of the systems by using the capacity.
2.5 Approximate solutions
3 Results and discussion
4 Application
The job scheduling scheme is interesting and one of the essential research fields in cloud computing. It plays a similar role itself in cloud computing. The job scheduling system is accountable to choose the best appropriate resources in a cloud computing users’ jobs, by compelling various static and dynamic parameter constraints of the cloud into the deliberation. In this section, we deal with a model that describes the job scheduling system based on the queuing property and cost function considering the users, providers, and the quality of the system (QoS). By utilizing a cloud computing environment, we may assume it as a very influential server. This server holds the user’s jobs. For each job one may have a different QoS obligation; typically, the user’s jobs have various agencies to be treated. Therefore, we can classify the jobs’ urgencies into several classes. Customarily, since the cloud computes resources, customers continuously deliberate which cloud computing resource can encounter their job QoS supplies for computing (such as the paid time of job ruining, the calculating capacity), and how much the cost is that they must feed for the cloud computing resources.
The cost function with \(\pmb{\tau=1}\) , \(\pmb{\lambda=2}\) , \(\pmb{\rho=2}\)
Capacity (Λ) | Time | \(\boldsymbol{\chi_{i}}\) ( 14 ) | Cost: ( ν = 1) | ν = 0.75 | ν = 0.5 | ν = 0.25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.1 | 30 | 70.37 | 57.444 | 39.712 | 19.412 |
2 | 0.25 | 60 | 191.25 | 156.122 | 107.928 | 52.758 |
3 | 0.55 | 90 | 203.78 | 166.351 | 115 | 56.215 |
4 | 0.75 | 120 | 420.16 | 342.687 | 237.11 | 115.9 |
5 | 1 | 150 | 550.89 | 449.7 | 310.88 | 151.969 |
Table 1 shows the initial service rate and expectant service rate for each group in the queue with changed significance. Fractional calculus is utilized to minimize the cost. The decreasing of the fractional value \(\nu\in(0,1] \) implies the minimization of the cost function.
4.1 Discrete cloud system
5 Conclusion
We introduced a technique based on a class of fractional differential stochastic equations (fractional Fokker-Planck equations) to discuss the fractional entropy solutions of fractional dynamical systems. We showed that the concept of the transforms (see [42–49]) is very useful to complete our investigation. We applied the relation between Mellin and Laplace transforms. The approximate result is utilized to perform in a cloud computing environment system. We imposed straightforwardly a differential service adapted job scheduling system in the cloud computing setting. Examination and outcomes demonstrated that our method for the job scheduling system cannot only ensure the QoS supplies of the cloud computing service jobs, but it also can create the maximum profits for the system, with minimizing the cost.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees for giving useful suggestions for improving the work. This research is supported by Project UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOE/FCSIT/03.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Oldham, KB, Spanier, J: The Fractional Calculus (1974) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava, HM, Owa, S: Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1989) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Oustaloup, A: La commande CRONE: commande robuste d’ordre non entier. Hermes, Paris (1991) Google Scholar
- Miller, KS, Ross, B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations (1993) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Samko, SG, Kilbas, AA, Marichev, OI: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, Yverdon (1993) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Kiryakova, V: Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications. Longman, New York (1994) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Mainardi, F: Fractional calculus. In: Carpinteri, A, Mainardi, F (eds.) Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics. CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 378, pp. 291-348 (1997) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Hilfer, R (ed.): Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, vol. 128. World Scientific, Singapore (2000) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Zaslavsky, GM: Hamiltonian Chaos and Fractional Dynamics. Oxford University Press, London (2005) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Magin, RL: Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering. Begell House, Redding (2006) Google Scholar
- Sabatier, J, Agrawal, OP, Machado, JAT: Advances in Fractional Calculus, vol. 4, no. 9. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Hilfer, R: Threefold introduction to fractional derivatives. In: Anomalous Transport: Foundations and Applications, pp. 17-73 (2008) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mainardi, F: Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Mathematical Models. World Scientific, Singapore (2010) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Monje, CA, Chen, Y, Vinagre, BM, Xue, D, Feliu-Batlle, V: Fractional-Order Systems and Controls: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, London (2010) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Klafter, J, Lim, SC, Metzler, R: Fractional Dynamics: Recent Advances. World Scientific, Singapore (2011) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tarasov, VE: Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media. Springer, Berlin (2011) Google Scholar
- Baleanu, D, Diethelm, K, Scalas, E, Trujillo, JJ: Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods. Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos, vol. 3. World Scientific, Singapore (2012) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Yang, X-J: Advanced Local Fractional Calculus and Its Applications. World Science, New York (2012) Google Scholar
- Jumarie, G: Fractional Differential Calculus for Non-Differentiable Functions: Mechanics, Geometry, Stochastics, Information Theory. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken (2013) Google Scholar
- Jumarie, G: Maximum Entropy, Information Without Probability and Complex Fractals: Classical and Quantum Approach. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 112. Springer, Dordrecht (2013) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Tsallis, C: Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World. Springer, New York (2009) MATHGoogle Scholar
- Machado, JAT: Entropy analysis of integer and fractional dynamical systems. J. Appl. Nonlinear Dyn. 62, 371-378 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Machado, JAT: Entropy analysis of fractional derivatives and their approximation. J. Appl. Nonlinear Dyn. 1, 109-112 (2012) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado, JAT: Fractional order generalized information. Entropy 16, 2350-2361 (2014) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado, JAT: Entropy analysis of systems exhibiting negative probabilities. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 36, 58-64 (2016) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lopes, AM, Machado, JAT: Entropy analysis of industrial accident data series. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11(3), 031006 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW, Jalab, HA: Existence of entropy solutions for nonsymmetric fractional systems. Entropy 16, 4911-4922 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW, Moghaddasi, Z, Jalab, HA: Fractional differential texture descriptors based on the Machado entropy for image splicing detection. Entropy 17, 4775-4785 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW, Jalab, HA: Existence of Ulam stability for iterative fractional differential equations based on fractional entropy. Entropy 17, 3172-3181 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW, Jalab, HA, Gani, A: Cloud entropy management system involving a fractional power. Entropy 18, 1-11 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang, R, Liao, H, Yang, M, Li, C: A decision-making method for selecting cloud computing service based on information entropy. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 8(4), 225-232 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Di Paola, M: Complex fractional moments and their use for the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation. In: Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28-30 August, Vienna, Austria, pp. 28-30 (2013) Google Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW: Fractional complex transforms for fractional differential equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 192 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW: Complex transforms for systems of fractional differential equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 814759 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gerhold, S: Asymptotics for a variant of the Mittag-Leffler function. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 23(6), 397-403 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yang, XJ, Baleanu, D, Lazarević, MP, Cajić, MS: Fractal boundary value problems for integral and differential equations with local fractional operators. Therm. Sci. (2015). doi:10.2298/TSCI130717103Y Google Scholar
- Ibrahim, RW, Jalab, HA: Discrete boundary value problem based on the fractional Gâteaux derivative. Bound. Value Probl. 2015, 23 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad, B, Agarwal, RP, Alsaedi, A: Fractional differential equations and inclusions with semiperiodic and three-point boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2016, 28 (2016) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava, HM, Singh Chandel, RC, Vishwakarma, PK: Fractional derivatives of certain generalized hypergeometric functions of several variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 184(3), 560-572 (1994) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bas, E, Metin, F: Fractional singular Sturm-Liouville operator for Coulomb potential. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 300 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ansari, A: Some inverse fractional Legendre transforms of gamma function form. Kodai Math. J. 38(3), 658-671 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Khosravian-Arab, H, Dehghan, M, Eslahchi, MR: Fractional Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems in unbounded domains: theory and applications. J. Comput. Phys. 299, 526-560 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sat, M, Panakhov, ES: Spectral problem for diffusion operator. Appl. Anal. 93(6), 1178-1186 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Sat, M, Panakhov, ES: A uniqueness theorem for Bessel operator from interior spectral data. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 713654 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Micula, S: On spline collocation and the Hilbert transform. Carpath. J. Math. 31(1), 89-95 (2015) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Marin, M: An evolutionary equation in thermoelasticity of dipolar bodies. J. Math. Phys. 40(3), 1391-1399 (1999) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Marsavina, L, Craciun, M: The asymptotic stress field for free edge joints under small-scale yielding conditions. An. Ştiinţ. Univ. ‘Ovidius’ Constanţa, Ser. Mat. 17(3), 171-181 (2009) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar