Skip to main content

Advertisement

Boundary Value Problems
Boundary Value Problems Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Uniqueness of iterative positive solutions for the singular fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions

Boundary Value Problems20162016:147

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0652-1

©  Guo et al. 2016

  • Received: 16 May 2016
  • Accepted: 28 July 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

The uniqueness of positive solution for a class of singular fractional differential system with integral boundary conditions is considered in this paper and many types of equation system are contained in this equation system because there are many parameters which can be changeable in this equation system. The fractional orders are involved in the nonlinearity of the boundary value problem and the nonlinearity is allowed to be singular in regard to not only time variable but also space variable. The existence of uniqueness of positive solution is mainly obtained by fixed point theorem of mixed monotone operator and the positive solution of equation system is dependent on λ. An iterative sequence and convergence rate are given which are important for practical application and an example is given to demonstrate the validity of our main results.

Keywords

  • fractional differential system
  • integral boundary conditions
  • singular problem
  • iterative positive solution
  • mixed monotone operator

MSC

  • 26A33
  • 34A08
  • 34B15
  • 34B16
  • 34B18

1 Introduction

In the past couple of decades, boundary value problems for nonlinear fractional differential equations arise from the studies of complex problems in many disciplinary areas such as aerodynamics, fluid flows, electrodynamics of complex medium, electrical networks, rheology, polymer rheology, economics, biology chemical physics, control theory, signal and image processing, blood flow phenomena, and so on. Fractional-order models have been shown to be more accurate and realistic than integer-order models, and with this advantage in the application of these models, it is important to theoretically establish the conditions for the existence of positive solutions because theoretical results can help people to get an in-depth understanding for the dynamic behavior in the practical process, so the study of abstract fractional models is important and relevant nowadays. In recent years, many authors investigated the existence of positive solutions for fractional equation boundary value problems (see [1–22] and the references therein), and a great deal of results have been developed for differential and integral boundary value problems. The authors in [23] studied the following system of singular fractional differential equations:
$$\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} -D_{0+}^{\alpha}u(t)=f(t,u(t), D_{0^{+}}^{\beta }u(t),y(t)),\qquad -D_{0+}^{\gamma}y(t)=g(t,u(t)), \quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{0^{+}}^{\beta}x(0)=0,\qquad D_{0^{+}}^{\mu}x(1)=\sum_{j=1}^{p-2}a_{j}D_{0^{+}}^{\mu}x(\xi_{j}), \\ y(0)=0,\qquad D_{0^{+}}^{v}y(1)=\sum_{j=1} ^{p-2}b_{j}D_{0^{+}}^{v}y(\xi_{j}), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(\alpha,\gamma,\beta,v,\mu\in\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}=[0,+\infty)\), \(1<\gamma<\alpha\leq2\), \(1<\alpha-\beta<\gamma\), \(0<\beta\leq\mu <1\), \(0< v<1\), \(0<\xi_{1}<\xi_{2}<\cdots<\xi_{p-2}<1\), \(a_{j}, b_{j}\in\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\) with \(\sum_{j=1}^{p-2}a_{j}\xi_{j}^{\alpha -\mu-1}<1\), \(\sum_{j=1}^{p-2}b_{j}\xi_{j}^{\gamma-1}<1\), \(f\in C([0,1]\times(0,+\infty)^{3}, \mathbb{R}^{1}_{+})\) and may be singular at \(x_{i}=0\) (\(i=1,2,3\)), \(g\in C([0,1]\times(0,+\infty), \mathbb {R}^{1}_{+})\), \(D^{\alpha}_{0+}\), \(D^{\beta}_{0+}\), \(D^{\gamma}_{0+}\), \(D^{\mu}_{0+}\), \(D^{v}_{0+}\) are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivatives. By using the fixed point theorem of the mixed monotone operator, the authors obtained the uniqueness of the positive solution. In [24], the authors investigated the fractional differential equations
$$\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D_{0+}^{\alpha}u(t)+f(t,u(t),D^{v}_{0^{+}}u(t),D^{\mu}_{0^{+}}u(t))=0,\quad 0< t< 1, \\ u(0)=u'(0)=u''(0)=u''(1)=0, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(\alpha,v,\mu\in\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\), \(3<\alpha\leq4\), \(0< v\leq 1\), \(0<\mu\leq1\) are real numbers, f is a Carathéodory function, \(f(t,x,y,z)\) is singular at \(x,y,z=0\), and \(D^{\alpha}_{0+}\), \(D^{v}_{0+}\), \(D^{\mu}_{0+}\) are the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. The authors obtained the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions by means of Krasnosel’skii’s fixed point theorem. In [25], the authors investigated the fractional-order model for turbulent flow in a porous medium,
$$\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} - D_{t}^{\beta}(\varphi_{p}(-D_{t}^{\alpha }x))(t)=f(x(t),D_{t}^{\gamma}x(t)), \quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{t}^{\alpha}x(0)=D_{t}^{\alpha+1}x(0)=D_{t}^{\alpha}x(1)=0,\qquad D_{t}^{\gamma}x(0)=0,\qquad D_{t}^{\gamma}x(1)=\int_{0}^{1}D_{t}^{\gamma}x(s)\,dA(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(\alpha,\beta,\gamma\in\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\), \(0<\gamma\leq 1<\alpha\leq2<\beta<3\), \(\alpha-\gamma>1\), \(\int_{0}^{1}x(s)\,dA(s)\) denotes a Riemann-Stieltjes integral, A is a function of bounded variation, and dA can be a signed measure. The p-Laplacian operator is defined as \(\varphi_{p}(s)=|s|^{p-2}s\), \(p>2\), and the nonlinearity \(f(t,u,v)\) may be singular at both \(u=0\) and \(v=0\), and \(D_{t}^{\alpha }\), \(D_{t}^{\beta}\), \(D_{t}^{\gamma}\) are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivatives. The authors obtained the uniqueness of a positive solution by using the fixed point theorem of the mixed monotone operator. In [26], the authors investigated the following system of singular problems:
$$\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} -D_{t}^{\alpha}u(t)+\lambda f(t,u(t), D_{t}^{\beta}u(t),v(t))=0, \\ -D_{t}^{\gamma}v(t)+\lambda g(t,u(t))=0,\quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{t}^{\beta}u(0)=D_{t}^{\beta+1}u(0)=0, \qquad D_{t}^{\beta}u(1)=\int _{0}^{1}D_{t}^{\beta}u(s)\,dA(s), \\ v(0)=v'(0)=0,\qquad v(1)=\int_{0}^{1}v(s)\,dB(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(\alpha,\beta,\gamma\in\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\), \(2<\alpha,\gamma \leq3\), \(0<\beta<1\), u denotes the number of uninfected CD4+T cells and v denotes the number of infected cells, \(\lambda>0\) is a parameter, \(\alpha-\beta>2\), \(\int_{0}^{1}D_{t}^{\beta}u(s)\,dA(s)\), and \(\int_{0}^{1}v(s)\,dB(s)\) denote the Riemann-Stieltjes integrals of u with respect to A and B, respectively, A, B are bounded variations, \(f: (0,1)\times\mathbb{R}^{3}_{+}\rightarrow(-\infty ,+\infty)\), \(g: (0,1)\times\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\rightarrow(-\infty ,+\infty)\) are two continuous functions and may be singular at \(t=0,1\), \(D_{t}^{\alpha}\), \(D_{t}^{\beta}\), \(D_{t}^{\gamma}\) are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivatives. The authors obtained the existence of positive solution by fixed point theorem.
In present, many papers are devoted to the fractional differential equations in which the fractional orders are involved in the nonlinearity; see [1–4, 23–26]. On the other hand, there are some papers studying singular equations in regard to space variable, we refer the reader to [5–9]. Motivated by the results above, we utilize a fixed point theorem to investigate the existence results of positive solution of the following class of nonlinear singular fractional differential equations:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D_{0+}^{\alpha}u(t)+\lambda f(t,u(t),D^{\mu_{1}}_{0^{+}}u(t),D^{\mu _{2}}_{0^{+}}u(t),\ldots,D^{\mu_{n-2}}_{0^{+}}u(t),v(t))=0, \quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{0+}^{\beta}v(t)+\mu g(t,u(t),D^{\eta_{1}}_{0^{+}}u(t),D^{\eta _{2}}_{0^{+}}u(t),\ldots,D^{\eta_{m-2}}_{0^{+}}u(t))=0,\quad 0< t< 1, \\ u(0)=u'(0)=\cdots=u^{(n-2)}(0)=0,\qquad u^{(n-2)}(1)=\chi\int_{0}^{\eta }h(s)u^{(n-2)}(s)\,dA(s), \\ v(0)=v'(0)=\cdots=v^{(m-2)}(0)=0,\qquad v^{(m-2)}(1)=\iota\int _{0}^{\vartheta}a(s)v^{(m-2)}(s)\,dB(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(1.1)
where \(\alpha,\beta,\mu_{\kappa},\eta_{\varrho}\in\mathbb {R}^{1}_{+}\), \(n,m,\kappa,\varrho\in\mathbb{N}\) (natural number set) and \(n-1<\alpha\leq n\), \(m-1<\beta\leq m\), \(m< n\) (\(n,m\geq2\)), \(\kappa-1<\mu_{\kappa}\leq\kappa\) (\(\kappa=1,2,\ldots,n-2\)), \(\varrho-1<\eta_{\varrho}\leq\varrho\) (\(\varrho=1,2,\ldots,m-2\)), and \(0<\eta,\vartheta\leq1\), \(\lambda,\mu,\chi,\iota>0\) are parameters, \(f\in C((0,1)\times(0,+\infty)^{n},\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+})\), and \(f(t, x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) has a singularity at \(x_{i}=0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)) and \(t=0,1\), \(g\in C((0,1)\times(0,+\infty)^{m-1} ,\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+})\), \(h,a\in C(0,1)\) with \(\int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)<1\), \(\int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta -m+1}a(t)\,dB(t)<1\), A, B are functions of bounded variation, \(\int _{0}^{\eta}h(s)u^{(n-2)}(s)\,dA(s)\), \(\int_{0}^{\vartheta }a(s)v^{(m-2)}(s)\,dB(s)\) denote the Riemann-Stieltjes integral with respect to A and B, \(D_{0^{ +}}^{\alpha}u\), \(D_{0+}^{\beta}v\), \(D^{\mu_{\kappa}}_{0^{+}}u\) (\(\kappa =1,2,\ldots,n-2\)), \(D^{\eta_{\varrho}}_{0^{+}}u\) (\(\varrho=1,2,\ldots ,m-2\)) are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivatives. The existence of positive solutions is obtained by means of a mixed monotone operator in cones in this paper.

In this paper, we study the existence of positive solutions to BVP (1.1), where \((u,v)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is said to be a positive solution of BVP (1.1) if and only if u, v satisfies (1.1) and \(u(t)>0\), \(v(t)>0\) for any \(t\in(0, 1]\). We should address here that our work presented in this paper has various new system features. First of all, the system of equations in question include many types of system of equations as special cases because there are many parameters which can be changeable in this equation system. Second, our study is on singular nonlinear differential boundary value problems, that is, \(f(t, x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) has singularity at \(x_{i}=0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\)) and \(t=0,1\), and \(g(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{m-1})\) may be singular at \(t=0,1\). Third, fractional derivatives is involved in the nonlinear terms and boundary conditions of fractional differential (1.1). Fourth, the uniqueness of the positive solution of equation (1.1) is dependent on λ.

2 Preliminaries and lemmas

For the convenience of the reader, we first present some basic definitions and lemmas that are important and are to be used in the rest of the paper. The definitions can also be found in recent literature such as [27, 28].

Definition 2.1

[27, 28]

The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order \(\alpha>0\) of a function \(y:(0,\infty)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{1}\) is given by
$$I_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}y(t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int _{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\alpha-1}y(s)\,ds, $$
provided that the right-hand side is pointwise defined on \((0,\infty)\).

Definition 2.2

[27, 28]

The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order \(\alpha>0\) of a continuous function \(y:(0,\infty)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{1}\) is given by
$$D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}y(t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-\alpha)} \biggl(\frac {d}{dt} \biggr)^{n} \int_{0}^{t}\frac{y(s)}{(t-s)^{\alpha-n+1}}\,ds, $$
where \(n=[\alpha]+1\), \([\alpha]\) denotes the integer part of the number α, provided that the right-hand side is pointwise defined on \((0,\infty)\).

Lemma 2.1

[27, 28]

Assume that \(u\in C^{n}[0,1]\), then
$$I_{0^{+}}^{\alpha} {D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}u(t)=u(t)+C_{1}t^{\alpha -1}+C_{2}t^{\alpha-2}+ \cdots+C_{n}t^{\alpha-n}} , $$
where n is the least integer greater than or equal to \(\alpha, C_{i}\in\mathbb{R}^{1}\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)).

Lemma 2.2

[29]

  1. (1)
    If \(x\in L(0,1)\), \(v>\sigma>0\), then
    $$I_{0^{+}}^{v}I_{0^{+}}^{\sigma}x(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{v+\sigma}x(t), \qquad D_{0^{+}}^{\sigma}I_{0^{+}}^{v}x(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{v-\sigma}x(t), \qquad D_{0^{+}}^{\sigma}I_{0^{+}}^{\sigma}x(t)=x(t). $$
     
  2. (2)
    If \(v>0\), \(\sigma>0\), then
    $$D_{0^{+}}^{v}t^{\sigma-1}=\frac{\Gamma(\sigma)}{\Gamma(\sigma -v)}t^{\sigma-v-1}. $$
     
For convenience in our presentation, we here list some conditions to be used throughout the paper.
(S1): 

\(f(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})=\phi(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{n})+\psi(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\), where \(\phi:(0,1)\times (0,+\infty)^{n}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\) is continuous, \(\phi (t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) may be singular at \(t=0,1\) and is nondecreasing on \(x_{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)); \(\psi:(0,1)\times (0,+\infty)^{n}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+}\) is continuous, \(\psi (t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) may be singular at \(t=0,1\) and \(x_{i}=0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)), and is nonincreasing on \(x_{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)).

(S2): 
There exists \(\sigma\in(0,1)\) such that, for all \(x_{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\)), \(t\in(0,1)\), and \(l\in(0,1)\),
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},\ldots,lx_{n})\geq l^{\sigma}\phi (t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}), \\ & \psi\bigl(t,l^{-1}x_{1},l^{-1}x_{2}, \ldots,l^{-1}x_{n}\bigr)\geq l^{\sigma} \psi(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}). \end{aligned}$$
(S3): 
\(g\in C((0,1)\times(0,+\infty)^{m-1},\mathbb{R}^{1}_{+})\), \(g(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{m-1})\) may be singular at \(t=0,1\) and is nondecreasing on \(x_{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2,\ldots,m-1\)). Moreover, there exists \(\varsigma\in(0,1)\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}& g(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},\ldots,lx_{m-1}) \\ & \quad \geq l^{\varsigma }g(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{m-1}), \quad t, l\in(0,1), x_{i}>0, i=1,2,\ldots,m-1. \end{aligned}$$
(S4): 
$$\begin{aligned}& 0< \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)} \psi (s,1,1,\ldots,1)\,ds< +\infty, \\ & 0< \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds< +\infty, \\ & 0< \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1,1,\ldots,1) \,ds< +\infty. \end{aligned}$$

Remark 2.1

According to (S2) and (S3), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},\ldots,lx_{n}) \\& \quad \leq l^{\sigma}\phi (t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}), \quad t\in(0,1), l\geq1, x_{i}>0, i=1,2,\ldots,n, \\& \psi\bigl(t,l^{-1}x_{1},l^{-1}x_{2}, \ldots,l^{-1}x_{n}\bigr) \\& \quad \leq l^{\sigma} \psi(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}),\quad t \in(0,1), l\geq1, x_{i}>0, i=1,2,\ldots,n, \\& g(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},\ldots,lx_{m-1}) \\& \quad \leq l^{\varsigma }g(t,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{m-1}), \quad t\in(0,1), l\geq1, x_{i}>0, i=1,2,\ldots,m-1. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 2.3

Let \(\rho\in L^{1}(0,1)\cap C(0,1)\), then the equation of the BVPs
$$\begin{aligned}& \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} -D_{0+}^{\alpha-n+2} x(t)=\rho(t),\quad 0< t< 1, \\ x(0)=0,\qquad x(1)=\chi\int_{0}^{\eta}h(s)x(s)\,dA(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(2.1)
$$\begin{aligned}& \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} -D_{0+}^{\beta-m+2} y(t)=\rho(t),\quad 0< t< 1, \\ y(0)=0,\qquad y(1)=\iota\int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(s)y(s)\,dB(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(2.2)
have the integral representation
$$ \begin{aligned} &x(t)= \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\rho(s)\,ds= \int _{0}^{1}\bigl(G_{1}(t,s)+G_{2}(t,s) \bigr)\rho(s)\,ds, \\ &y(t)= \int_{0}^{1}H(t,s)\rho(s)\,ds= \int _{0}^{1}\bigl(H_{1}(t,s)+H_{2}(t,s) \bigr)\rho(s)\,ds, \end{aligned} $$
(2.3)
respectively, where
$$G(t,s)=G_{1}(t,s)+G_{2}(t,s),\qquad H(t,s)=H_{1}(t,s)+H_{2}(t,s), $$
in which
$$\begin{aligned}& G_{1}(t,s)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} t^{\alpha-n+1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}-(t-s)^{\alpha-n+1},& 0\leq s \leq t\leq1, \\ t^{\alpha-n+1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}, & 0\leq t \leq s\leq1, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(2.4)
$$\begin{aligned}& G_{2}(t,s)=\frac{\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}}{1-\chi\int_{0}^{\eta }t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)} \int_{0}^{\eta}h(t)G_{1}(t,s) \,dA(t), \end{aligned}$$
(2.5)
$$\begin{aligned}& H_{1}(t,s)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)}\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} t^{\beta-m+1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}-(t-s)^{\beta-m+1},& 0\leq s \leq t\leq1, \\ t^{\beta-m+1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}, & 0\leq t \leq s\leq1, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(2.6)
$$\begin{aligned}& H_{2}(t,s)=\frac{\iota t^{\beta-m+1}}{1-\iota\int_{0}^{\vartheta }t^{\beta-m+1}a(t)\,dB(t)} \int_{0}^{\vartheta }a(t)H_{1}(t,s) \,dB(t). \end{aligned}$$
(2.7)

Proof

The proof is similar to that for Lemma 2.3 in [30], we omit it here. □

Lemma 2.4

Let \(\theta_{1}(s)=m_{1}s(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\), \(\theta _{2}(s)=m_{2}s(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}\), then the Green functions \(G(t,s)\) and \(H(t,s)\) satisfy:
  1. (1)

    \(G(t,s)>0\), \(H(t,s)>0\), \(\forall t,s\in(0,1)\),

     
  2. (2)
    \(\forall t,s\in[0,1]\),
    $$\begin{aligned}& t^{\alpha-n+1}\theta_{1}(s)\leq G(t,s)\leq M_{1}t^{\alpha -n+1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}, \\& t^{\beta-m+1}\theta_{2}(s)\leq H(t,s)\leq M_{2}t^{\beta -m+1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}, \end{aligned}$$
    where
    $$\begin{aligned}& m_{1}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)} \biggl(1+\frac{\chi\int _{0}^{\eta}h(t)t^{\alpha-n+1}\,dA(t)}{1-\chi\int_{0}^{\eta} h(t)t^{\alpha-n+1}\,dA(t)} \biggr), \\& m_{2}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)} \biggl(1+\frac{\iota\int _{0}^{\vartheta}a(t)t^{\beta-m+1}\,dB(t)}{ 1-\iota\int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(t)t^{\beta-m+1}\,dB(t)} \biggr), \\& M_{1}=\frac{2}{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)} \biggl(1+\frac{\chi\int _{0}^{\eta}h(t)t^{\alpha-n}\,dA(t)}{1-\chi\int_{0}^{\eta} h(t)t^{\alpha-n+1}\,dA(t)} \biggr), \\& M_{2}=\frac{2}{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)} \biggl(1+\frac{\iota\int _{0}^{\vartheta}a(t)t^{\beta-m}\,dB(t)}{ 1-\iota\int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(t)t^{\beta-m+1}\,dB(t)} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
     

Proof

The proof is similar to that for Lemma 2.4 in [30], we omit it here. □

Let \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\), then \(x(t)=D_{0^{+}}^{ n-2}u(t)\), \(y(t)=D_{0^{+}}^{ m-2}v(t)\), the problem (1.1) can turn into the following modified problem of the BVP (2.8):
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D_{0+}^{\alpha-n+2} x(t)+\lambda f(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(t),\ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t))=0,\quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{0+}^{\beta-m+2} y(t)+\mu g(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(t),\ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}}x(t))=0, \quad 0< t< 1, \\ x(0)=0,\qquad x(1)=\chi\int_{0}^{\eta}h(s)x(s)\,dA(s), \\ y(0)=0,\qquad y(1)=\iota\int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(s)y(s)\,dB(s). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(2.8)

Lemma 2.5

Let \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\), \(x(t), y(t)\in C[0,1]\). Then (1.1) can be transformed into (2.8). Moreover, if \((x,y)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a positive solution of the problem (2.8), then \((I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x,I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y)\) is a positive solution of the problem (1.1).

Proof

Put \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\) into (1.1), by Lemma 2.2, we have
$$ \begin{aligned} &D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}u(t)=\frac{d^{n}}{dt^{n}}I_{0^{+}}^{n-\alpha }I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)= \frac{d^{n}}{dt^{n}}I_{0^{+}}^{2n-\alpha-2} x(t)=D_{0^{+}} ^{\alpha-n+2}x(t), \\ &D^{\mu_{i}}_{0^{+}}u(t)=D^{\mu _{i}}_{0^{+}}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{i}}x(t), \quad i=1,2,\ldots,n-2, \\ &D_{0^{+}}^{\beta}v(t)=\frac{d^{m}}{dt^{m}}I_{0^{+}}^{m-\beta }I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)= \frac{d^{m}}{dt^{m}}I_{0^{+}}^{2m-\beta-2} y(t)=D_{0^{+}} ^{\beta-m+2}y(t), \\ &D^{\eta_{i}}_{0^{+}}u(t)=D^{\eta _{i}}_{0^{+}}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{i}}x(t), \quad i=1,2,\ldots,m-2. \end{aligned} $$
(2.9)
By \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\), and (2.9), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& D_{0^{+}}^{n-2}u(0)=x(0)=0,\qquad u^{(n-2)}(1)=x(1) =\chi \int_{0}^{\eta}h(s)x(s)\,dA(s), \\& -D_{0+}^{\alpha-n+2} x(t)=\lambda f\bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(t), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t) \bigr), \\& D_{0^{+}}^{m-2}v(0)=y(0)=0,\qquad v^{(m-2)}(1)=y(1) =\iota \int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(s)y(s)\,dB(s), \\& -D_{0+}^{\beta-m+2} y(t)=\mu g\bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(t), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}}x(t)\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
Thus (1.1) is transformed into (2.8).
Now, assume \((x,y)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a positive solution for problem (2.8). Let \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\), by Lemma 2.2, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& -D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}u(t)= -D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha }I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t) = -D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha-n+2}x(t) \\& \hphantom{-D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}u(t)}= \lambda f\bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(t), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t) \bigr) \\& \hphantom{-D_{0^{+}}^{\alpha}u(t)}= \lambda f\bigl(t,u(t),D^{\mu_{1}}_{0^{+}}u(t),D^{\mu _{2}}_{0^{+}}u(t), \ldots,D^{\mu_{n-2}}_{0^{+}}u(t),v(t)\bigr),\quad 0< t< 1, \\& -D_{0^{+}}^{\beta}v(t)= -D_{0^{+}}^{\beta }I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t) = -D_{0^{+}}^{\beta-m+2}y(t) \\& \hphantom{-D_{0^{+}}^{\beta}v(t)}= \mu g\bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(t), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}}x(t)\bigr) \\& \hphantom{-D_{0^{+}}^{\beta}v(t)}= \mu g\bigl(t,u(t),D^{\eta_{1}}_{0^{+}}u(t),D^{\eta _{2}}_{0^{+}}u(t), \ldots,D^{\eta_{n-2}}_{0^{+}}u(t)\bigr),\quad 0< t< 1. \end{aligned}$$
On the other hand, by \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)\), \(v(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)\), and Lemma 2.2, we also get
$$\begin{aligned}& D_{0^{+}}^{n-2}u(t)=D_{0^{+}}^{n-2}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(t)=x(t), \\& D_{0^{+}}^{m-2}v(t)=D_{0^{+}}^{m-2}I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(t)=y(t), \end{aligned}$$
which implies that
$$\begin{aligned}& u(0)=u'(0)=\cdots=u^{(n-2)}(0)=x(0)=0, \\& u^{(n-2)}(1)=x(1)=\chi \int_{0}^{\eta}h(s)x(s)\,dA(s)=\chi \int _{0}^{\eta}h(s)u^{(n-2)}(s)\,dA(s), \\& v(0)=v'(0)=\cdots=v^{(m-2)}(0)=y(0)=0, \\& v^{(m-2)}(1)=y(1) =\iota \int_{0}^{\vartheta}a(s)y(s)\,dB(s)=\iota \int_{0}^{\vartheta }a(s)v^{(m-2)}(s)\,dB(s). \end{aligned}$$
Clearly, \(u=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x, v=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y\in C([0,1],\mathbb {R}^{1}_{+})\). Hence, \((I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x,I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y)\) is a positive solution of problem (1.1). Hence, (1.1) and (2.8) are equivalent. □
The vector \((x,y)\) is a solution of system (2.8) if and only if \((x,y)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a solution of the following system of nonlinear integral equations:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} x(t)=\lambda\int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)f(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu _{1}}x(s),\ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y(s))\,ds, \\ y(s)=\mu\int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g(\tau,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(\tau ),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau),\ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta _{m-2}}x(\tau))\,d\tau. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(2.10)
Obviously, system (2.10) is equivalent to the following system of integral equations:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}[b] x(t)={}&\lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)f \biggl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s), \\ &I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g\bigl(\tau ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(\tau),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}}x(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau \biggr)\biggr)\,ds. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(2.11)

Let P be a normal cone of a Banach space E, and \(e\in P\), \(e>\theta \) (θ is a zero element of E). Define a component of P by \(Q_{e}=\{u\in P|\mbox{ there exist constants }c,C>0\mbox{ such that }ce\leq u\leq Ce\}\). \(A:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow P\) is said to be mixed monotone if \(A(u,y)\) is nondecreasing in u and nonincreasing in y, i.e., \(u_{1}\leq u_{2}\) (\(u_{1},u_{2}\in Q_{e} \)) implies \(A(u_{1},y)\leq A(u_{2},y)\) for any \(y\in Q_{e}\), and \(y_{1}\leq y_{2}\) (\(y_{1},y_{2}\in Q_{e}\)) implies \(A(u,y_{1})\geq A(u,y_{2})\) for any \(u\in Q_{e}\). The element \(u^{\star}\in Q_{e}\) is called a fixed point of A if \(A(u^{\star},u^{\star})=u^{\star}\).

Lemma 2.6

[31, 32]

Suppose that \(A:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\) is a mixed monotone operator and there exists a constant σ, \(0<\sigma<1\), such that
$$ A \biggl(lx,\frac{1}{l}y \biggr)\geq l^{\sigma}A(x,y),\quad x, y\in Q_{e}, 0< l< 1, $$
(2.12)
then A has a unique fixed point \(x^{\star}\in Q_{e}\), and, for any \(x_{0},y_{0}\in Q_{e}\), we have
$$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}x_{k}=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty }y_{k}=x^{\star}, $$
where
$$x_{k}=A(x_{k-1},y_{k-1}),\qquad y_{k}=A(y_{k-1},x_{k-1}), \quad k=1,2,\ldots $$
and the convergence rate is
$$\bigl\Vert x_{k}-x^{\star}\bigr\Vert =o \bigl(1-r^{\sigma^{k}}\bigr),\qquad \bigl\Vert y_{k}-x^{\star} \bigr\Vert =o\bigl(1-r^{\sigma^{k}}\bigr), $$
where r is a constant, \(0< r<1\), and dependent on \(x_{0}\), \(y_{0}\).

Lemma 2.7

[31, 32]

Suppose that \(A:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\) is a mixed monotone operator and there exists a constant \(\sigma\in(0,1)\) such that (2.12) holds. If \(x_{\lambda }^{\star}\in Q_{e}\) is a unique solution of equation
$$\lambda A(x,x)=x, \quad \lambda>0, $$
then:
  1. (1)

    For any \(\lambda_{0}\in(0,+\infty)\), \(\|x_{\lambda}^{\star }-x_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\), \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\).

     
  2. (2)

    If \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\), then \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies \(x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\leq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\), \(x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\neq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\).

     
  3. (3)

    \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow+\infty}\|x_{\lambda}^{\star}\| =+\infty\), \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0^{+}}\|x_{\lambda}^{\star}\| =0\).

     
Let \(e(t)=t^{\alpha-n+1}\), we define a normal cone of \(C[0,1]\) by
$$P= \bigl\{ x\in C[0,1]:x(t)\geq0, 0\leq t\leq1 \bigr\} , $$
also define a component of P by
$$Q_{e}= \biggl\{ x\in P: \mbox{there exists } D>1, \frac{1}{D}e(t)\leq x(t)\leq De(t), t\in[0,1] \biggr\} . $$

Remark 2.2

By simple calculation, for any \(t\in[0, 1]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}e(t) =\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-2)} \int _{0}^{t}(t-s)^{n-3}s^{\alpha-n+1} \,ds \\& \hphantom{ I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}e(t)} =\frac{B(\alpha-n+2,n-2)}{\Gamma(n-2)} t^{\alpha-1}=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha)}t^{\alpha-1}, \end{aligned}$$
(2.13)
$$\begin{aligned}& I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}t^{\beta-m+1} =\frac{1}{\Gamma(m-2)} \int _{0}^{t}(t-s)^{m-3}s^{\beta-m+1} \,ds \\& \hphantom{I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}t^{\beta-m+1}}=\frac{B(\beta-m+2,m-2)}{\Gamma(m-2)} t^{\beta-1}=\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)}{\Gamma(\beta)}t^{\beta-1}, \end{aligned}$$
(2.14)
$$\begin{aligned}& I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{\kappa}}e(t) =\frac{1}{\Gamma(n-2-\mu _{\kappa})} \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{n-3-\mu_{\kappa}}s^{\alpha-n+1} \,ds \\& \hphantom{I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{\kappa}}e(t)}=\frac{B(\alpha-n+2,n-2-\mu_{\kappa})}{\Gamma(n-2-\mu_{\kappa})} t^{\alpha-\mu_{\kappa}-1} \\& \hphantom{I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{\kappa}}e(t)} =\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{\kappa })}t^{\alpha-\mu_{\kappa}-1},\quad \kappa=1,2,\ldots,n-2, \end{aligned}$$
(2.15)
$$\begin{aligned}& I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{\varrho}}e(t) =\frac{1}{\Gamma (n-2-\eta_{\varrho})} \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{n-3-\eta_{\varrho }}s^{\alpha-n+1} \,ds \\& \hphantom{I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{\varrho}}e(t)}=\frac{B(\alpha-n+2,n-2-\eta_{\varrho})}{\Gamma(n-2-\eta _{\varrho})} t^{\alpha-\eta_{\varrho}-1} \\& \hphantom{I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{\varrho}}e(t)} =\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{\varrho })}t^{\alpha-\eta_{\varrho}-1}, \quad \varrho=1,2, \ldots,m-2. \end{aligned}$$
(2.16)

3 Main results

Theorem 3.1

Suppose that (S1)-(S4) hold. Then the BVP (1.1) has a unique positive solution \((u_{\lambda}^{\star },v_{\lambda}^{\star})\), which satisfies
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}t^{\alpha-1}\leq u_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)\leq \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma (\alpha)}t^{\alpha-1}, \\ & \frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)\mu t^{\beta-1}}{\Gamma(\beta )} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(s)s^{\varsigma(\alpha-1)}g(s,1,1, \ldots ,1)\,ds \\ & \quad \leq v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t) \\ & \quad \leq\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)M_{2}\mu t^{\beta-1}}{\Gamma(\beta )} \biggl( \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta _{m-2})}+1 \biggr) ^{\varsigma} \\ & \qquad {}\times\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1,1,\ldots,1) \,ds, \end{aligned}$$
(3.1)
and at the same time \(u_{\lambda}^{\star}\) satisfies:
  1. (1)

    For \(\lambda_{0}\in(0,\infty)\), \(\|u_{\lambda}^{\star }-u_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\), \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\).

     
  2. (2)

    If \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\), then \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\leq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\), \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\neq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\).

     
  3. (3)

    \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=0\), \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow+\infty}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=+\infty\).

     
Moreover, for any \(u_{0}\), we construct a successive sequence
$$\begin{aligned} u_{k+1}(t) =&I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}\biggl\{ \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s) \bigl[\phi\bigl(s,u_{ k}(s), D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{1}}u_{ k}(s), \\ &D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{2}}u_{ k}(s), \ldots,D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{n-2}}u_{ k}(s),Au^{(n-2)}_{k}(s) \bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(s,u_{ k}(s), D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{1}}u_{ k}(s),D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{2}}u_{ k}(s), \ldots,D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{n-2}}u_{ k}(s),Au^{(n-2)}_{k}(s) \bigr) \bigr]\,ds\biggr\} , \\ &k=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$
and we have \(\|u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty\), and the convergence rate
$$\bigl\Vert u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\bigr\Vert =o \bigl(1-r^{\sigma^{k}}\bigr), $$
where r is a constant, \(0< r<1\), and dependent on \(u_{0}\). Moreover,
$$v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int _{0}^{1}H(t,s)g\bigl(s,u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s),D_{0^{+}}^{\eta _{1}}u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s), \ldots, D_{0^{+}}^{\eta_{m-2}}u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s)\bigr) \,ds \biggr). $$

Proof

We first consider the existence of a positive solution to problem (2.10). From the discussion in Section 2, we only need to consider the existence of a positive solution to BVP (2.11). In order to realize this purpose, let
$$Ax(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int_{0}^{1}H(t,s)g \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(s), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}} x(s) \bigr)\,ds \biggr), $$
and, for any \(x,w\in Q_{e}\), we define the operator \(T_{\lambda }:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow P\) by
$$\begin{aligned} T_{\lambda}(x,w) (t) =&\lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\bigl[\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s),Ax(s)\bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu _{1}}w(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s) ,Aw(s)\bigr)\bigr]\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)
Now we prove that \(T_{\lambda}:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow P\) is well defined. For any \(x,w\in Q_{e}\), by (2.13), (2.16), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g\bigl(\tau,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x( \tau ),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau),\ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta _{m-2}}x( \tau)\bigr)\,d\tau \\& \quad \leq \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g \biggl(\tau, \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha -n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\tau^{\alpha-1} ,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{1})}\tau^{\alpha -\eta_{1}-1}, \ldots, \\& \qquad \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha -\eta_{m-2})} \tau^{\alpha-\eta_{m-2}-1} \biggr)\,d\tau \\& \quad \leq \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g \biggl(\tau, \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha -n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha)}+1 ,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{1})}+1,\ldots ,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1 \biggr)\,d \tau \\& \quad \leq \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g \biggl(\tau, \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha -n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1 ,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1,\ldots ,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1 \biggr)\,d \tau \\& \quad \leq M_{2} \biggl(\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta _{m-2})}+1 \biggr)^{\varsigma}s^{\beta-m+1} \int_{0}^{1}(1-\tau )^{\beta-m+1}g(\tau,1,1, \ldots,1)\,d\tau,\quad s\in[0,1], \\& \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g\bigl(\tau,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x( \tau ),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau),\ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta _{m-2}}x( \tau)\bigr)\,d\tau \\& \quad \geq \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g \biggl(\tau, \frac{\Gamma(\alpha -n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}\tau^{\alpha-1} ,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{1})}\tau^{\alpha -\eta_{1}-1}, \ldots, \\& \qquad \frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha -\eta_{m-2})} \tau^{\alpha-\eta_{m-2}-1} \biggr)\,d\tau \\& \quad \geq \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g \biggl(\tau, \frac{\Gamma(\alpha -n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}\tau^{\alpha-1} ,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}\tau^{\alpha -1}, \ldots,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}\tau ^{\alpha-1} \biggr)\,d\tau \\& \quad \geq \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma}s^{\beta-m+1} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(\tau)\tau ^{\varsigma(\alpha-1)}g(\tau,1,1,\ldots,1) \,d\tau, \quad s\in[0,1]. \end{aligned}$$
Hence, by (2.14), for any \(s\in[0,1]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& Ax(s) =I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g\bigl(\tau ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(\tau),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}} x(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau \biggr) \\& \hphantom{Ax(s)}\leq \frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)M_{2}\mu s^{\beta-1}}{\Gamma(\beta )} \biggl(\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta _{m-2})}+1 \biggr) ^{\varsigma} \\& \hphantom{Ax(s) ={}}{}\times\int_{0}^{1}(1-\tau)^{\beta-m+1}g(\tau,1,1, \ldots ,1)\,d\tau, \\& Ax(s) =I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int_{0}^{1}H(s,\tau)g\bigl(\tau ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(\tau),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x(\tau), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}} x(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau \biggr) \\& \hphantom{Ax(s)}\geq\frac{\mu\Gamma(\beta-m+2)s^{\beta-1}}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(\tau) \tau^{\varsigma(\alpha-1)}g(\tau ,1,1,\ldots,1)\,d\tau. \end{aligned}$$
(3.3)
By (3.3), (2.13), (2.15), (S1), and Remark 2.1, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr) \\& \quad \leq \phi\biggl(s,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha )}s^{\alpha-1}+1,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{1})} s^{\alpha-\mu_{1}-1}+1,\ldots, \\& \qquad \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\mu _{n-2})}s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}+1,\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)M_{2}\mu }{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl( \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{ \Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1 \biggr)^{\varsigma} \\& \qquad {} \times s^{\beta-1} \int_{0}^{1}(1-\tau)^{\beta-m+1}g(\tau ,1,1, \ldots,1)\,d\tau+1\biggr) \\& \quad \leq \phi(s,Db+1,Db+1,\ldots,Db+1) \\& \quad \leq (Db+1)^{\sigma}\phi(s,1,1,\ldots,1) \\& \quad \leq 2^{\sigma}b^{\sigma}D^{\sigma}\phi(s,1,1,\ldots,1), \quad s\in(0,1), \end{aligned}$$
(3.4)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& D> \max\biggl\{ \biggl[2^{\sigma}b^{\sigma}M_{1} \lambda \int _{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds \\& \hphantom{D>{}}{}+M_{1}c^{-\sigma }\lambda \int_{0}^{1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1} \psi(s,1,1,\ldots,1)\,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{1-\sigma}}, 1, 2c, b^{-1}, \\& \hphantom{D>{}}{}\biggl[c^{\sigma}\lambda \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)s^{\sigma (\alpha-1)} \phi(s,1,1,\ldots,1)\,ds+2^{-\sigma}b^{-\sigma} \lambda \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)\psi(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds \biggr]^{-\frac{1}{1-\sigma}} \biggr\} , \\& b=\max\biggl\{ \frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{ \Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{n-2})},1,\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)}{\Gamma (\beta)(M_{2}\mu)^{-1}}\biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma (\alpha-\eta_{m-2})} +1\biggr) ^{\varsigma} \\& \hphantom{b={}}{}\times\int_{0}^{1}(1-\tau)^{\beta-m+1}g(\tau,1,1, \ldots ,1)\,d\tau\biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$
By (3.3), (2.13), (2.15), (S1), and (S2), we also have
$$\begin{aligned}& \psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr) \\& \quad \leq \psi \biggl(s,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha )}s^{\alpha-1},\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{1})} s^{\alpha-\mu_{1}-1},\ldots,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma (\alpha-\mu_{n-2})}s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}, \\& \qquad \frac{\mu\Gamma(\beta-m+2)s^{\beta -1}}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma (\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(\tau) \tau^{\varsigma (\alpha-1)}g(\tau,1,1,\ldots,1)\,d\tau \biggr) \\& \quad \leq \psi \biggl(s,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1}, \frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha -\mu_{1}-1},\ldots,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1} , \frac{c}{D^{\varsigma}}s^{\beta-1} \biggr) \\& \quad \leq \psi \biggl(s,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1}, \frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha -1},\ldots,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1} \biggr) \\& \quad \leq \biggl(\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1} \biggr)^{-\sigma}\psi (s,1,1,\ldots,1) \\& \quad = c^{-\sigma}D^{\sigma}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)}\psi(s,1,1,\ldots,1), \quad s\in(0,1), \end{aligned}$$
(3.5)
where
$$\begin{aligned} c =&\min \biggl\{ \frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha )},1,\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)\mu}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl(\frac {\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{ \Gamma(\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma} \\ &{}\times\int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(\tau) \tau^{\varsigma(\alpha-1)}g(\tau ,1,\ldots,1)\,d\tau \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$
Noting \(\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1}<1\), by (3.3), (2.13), (2.15), (S1), and (S2), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr) \\& \quad \geq \phi \biggl(s,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha )}s^{\alpha-1},\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{1})} s^{\alpha-\mu_{1}-1},\ldots,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma (\alpha-\mu_{n-2})}s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}, \\& \qquad \frac{\mu\Gamma(\beta-m+2)}{\Gamma (\beta)} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)} \biggr)^{\varsigma} s^{\beta-1} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(\tau)\tau ^{\varsigma(\alpha-1)}g(\tau,1,1,\ldots,1)\,d\tau \biggr) \\& \quad \geq \phi \biggl(s,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1}, \frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha -\mu_{1}-1},\ldots,\frac{c}{D} s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}, \frac{c}{D}s^{\beta-1} \biggr) \\& \quad \geq \phi \biggl(s,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1}, \frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha -1},\ldots,\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1} \biggr) \\& \quad \geq \biggl(\frac{c}{D}s^{\alpha-1} \biggr)^{\sigma}\phi (s,1,1,\ldots,1) \\& \quad = c^{\sigma}D^{-\sigma}s^{\sigma(\alpha-1)}\phi(s,1,1,\ldots,1), \quad s\in(0,1), \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)
and by (3.3), (2.13), (2.15), (S1), and Remark 2.1, we also get
$$\begin{aligned}& \psi\bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s)\bigr) \\& \quad \geq \psi\biggl(s,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha )}s^{\alpha-1},\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\mu_{1})} s^{\alpha-\mu_{1}-1},\ldots,\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma (\alpha-\mu_{n-2})}s^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}, \\& \qquad \frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)M_{2}\mu}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl(\frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{ \Gamma(\alpha)}+1\biggr)^{\varsigma}s^{\beta-m+1} \int _{0}^{1}(1-\tau)^{\beta-m+1}g(\tau,1, \ldots,1)\,d\tau\biggr) \\& \quad \geq \psi\bigl(s,Dbs^{\alpha-1},Dbs^{\alpha-\mu_{1}-1},\ldots ,Dbs^{\alpha-\mu_{n-2}-1}, D^{\varsigma}bs^{\beta-m+1}\bigr) \\& \quad \geq \psi(s,Db+1,Db+1,\ldots,Db+1) \\& \quad \geq (Db+1)^{-\sigma}\psi(s,1,1,\ldots,1) \\& \quad \geq 2^{-\sigma}b^{-\sigma}D^{-\sigma}\psi(s,1,1, \ldots,1),\quad s\in(0,1). \end{aligned}$$
(3.7)
For \(x,w\in Q_{e}\), it follows from (3.4), (3.5) that
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq M_{1}t^{\alpha-n+1}\lambda \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq 2^{\sigma}b^{\sigma}D^{\sigma}M_{1} \lambda t^{\alpha -n+1} \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds< +\infty,\quad t\in[0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(3.8)
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s) ,Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq M_{1}t^{\alpha-n+1}\lambda \int_{0}^{1}\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s) ,Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq c^{-\sigma}D^{\sigma}M_{1}\lambda t^{\alpha-n+1} \int _{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)} \psi(s,1,1,\ldots ,1)\,ds< +\infty,\quad t\in[0,1]. \end{aligned}$$
(3.9)
By (H4), (3.8), and (3.9), we see that \(T_{\lambda }:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow P\) is well defined.
Next, we will prove that \(T_{\lambda}:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\). It follows from (3.8), (3.9) that
$$ T_{\lambda}(x,w) (t)\leq Dt^{\alpha-n+1}=De(t),\quad t \in[0,1]. $$
(3.10)
At the same time, by (3.6), (3.7), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq t^{\alpha-n+1}\lambda \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq c^{\sigma}D^{-\sigma}\lambda t^{\alpha-n+1} \int _{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)s^{\sigma(\alpha-1)} \phi(s,1,1,\ldots,1)\,ds,\quad t\in[0,1], \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s) ,Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq t^{\alpha-n+1}\lambda \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s) ,Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq 2^{-\sigma}D^{-\sigma}b^{-\sigma}\lambda t^{\alpha-n+1} \int _{0}^{1}\theta_{1}(s)\psi(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds,\quad t\in[0,1]. \end{aligned}$$
(3.12)
Equations (3.11) and (3.12) imply that
$$ T_{\lambda}(x,w) (t)\geq\frac{1}{D}t^{\alpha-n+1}= \frac{1}{D}e(t),\quad t\in[0,1]. $$
(3.13)
Hence, \(T_{\lambda}:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\) is well defined.
Next, we shall prove that \(T_{\lambda}:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\) is a mixed monotone operator. In fact, for any \(x_{1},x_{2}\in Q_{e}\) and \(x_{1}\leq x_{2}\), by the monotonicity of \(I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{i}}\), A and ϕ, for any \(t\in[0, 1]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{1}(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x_{1}(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x_{1}(s) ,Ax_{1}(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{2}(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x_{2}(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x_{2}(s) ,Ax_{2}(s) \bigr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.14)
Hence, by (3.14), we have
$$ T_{\lambda}(x_{1},w)\leq T_{\lambda}(x_{2},w), \quad w\in Q_{e}, $$
(3.15)
that is, \(T_{\lambda}(x,w)\) is nondecreasing on x for any \(w\in Q_{e}\). Similarly, if \(w_{1}\geq w_{2}\), \(w_{1}, w_{2}\in Q_{e}\), from (S1), for any \(t\in[0, 1]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w_{1}(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w_{1}(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w_{1}(s) ,Aw_{1}(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \leq \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w_{2}(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w_{2}(s), \ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w_{2}(s) ,Aw_{2}(s) \bigr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.16)
Hence, by (3.16), we have
$$ T_{\lambda}(x,w_{1})\leq T_{\lambda}(x,w_{2}), \quad x\in Q_{e}, $$
(3.17)
i.e., \(T_{\lambda}(x,w)\) is nonincreasing on w for any \(x\in Q_{e}\). Hence, by (3.15) and (3.17), we see that \(T_{\lambda }:Q_{e}\times Q_{e}\rightarrow Q_{e}\) is a mixed monotone operator.
Finally, we show that the operator \(T_{\lambda}\) satisfies (2.12). For any \(x,w\in Q_{e}\) and \(l\in(0,1)\), \(t\in[0, 1]\), by (S2) and (S3), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}lx(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}lx(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}} ^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}lx(s) ,Alx(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,lI_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),lI_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots, lI_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Alx(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq \lambda l^{\sigma} \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x(s) ,Ax(s) \bigr)\,ds, \end{aligned}$$
(3.18)
$$\begin{aligned}& \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}l^{-1}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}l^{-1}w(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}l^{-1}w(s), Al^{-1}w(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,l^{-1}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),l^{-1}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots,l^{-1}I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s), l^{-1}Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds \\& \quad \geq \lambda l^{\sigma} \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\psi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}w(s),I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}w(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}w(s), Aw(s) \bigr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.19)
Equations (3.18), (3.19) imply that
$$ T_{\lambda} \biggl(lx,\frac{1}{l}w \biggr)\geq l^{\sigma}T_{\lambda }(x,w), \quad x,w\in Q_{e}. $$
(3.20)
Hence, as regards Lemma 2.6 assume that there exists a unique positive solution \(x_{\lambda}^{\star}\in Q_{e}\) such that \(T_{\lambda }(x_{\lambda}^{\star},x_{\lambda}^{\star})=x_{\lambda}^{\star}\). It is easy to check that \(x_{\lambda}^{\star}\) is a unique positive solution of (2.8) for any given \(\lambda>0\). Moreover, by Lemma 2.7 we have the following conclusions:
  1. (1)

    For any \(\lambda_{0}\in(0,+\infty)\), \(\|x_{\lambda}^{\star }-x_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\), \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\).

     
  2. (2)

    If \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\), then \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies \(x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\leq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\), \(x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\neq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\).

     
  3. (3)

    \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0}\|x_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=0\), \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow+\infty}\|x_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=+\infty\).

     
By Lemma 2.5, we have
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} u_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda }^{\star}(t), \\ v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y_{\lambda}^{\star}(t), \quad t\in[0,1]. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.21)
Hence, by (3.21) and the monotonicity and continuity of \(I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}\), we get:
  1. (1)

    \(\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}-u_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star}\|\rightarrow 0\), \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\).

     
  2. (2)

    If \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\), then \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\leq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\), \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\neq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\).

     
  3. (3)

    \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=0\), \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow+\infty}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=+\infty\).

     
Moreover, for any \(u_{0}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{0}\in Q_{e}\), by Lemma 2.6, constructing a successive sequence
$$\begin{aligned} x_{k+1}(t) =&\lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\bigl[\phi \bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{k}(s), I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x_{ k}(s), \ldots,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x_{ k}(s),Ax_{ k}(s) \bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{ k}(s), I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{1}}x_{ k}(s),\ldots, I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\mu_{n-2}}x_{ k}(s) ,Ax_{ k}(s)\bigr)\bigr]\,ds, \quad k=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$
by \(u_{k+1}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{k+1}(t)\), then
$$\begin{aligned} u_{k+1}(t) =&I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}\biggl\{ \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s) \bigl[\phi\bigl(s,u_{ k}(s), D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{1}}u_{ k}(s),D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{2}}u_{ k}(s), \ldots,D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{n-2}}u_{ k}(s),Au^{(n-2)}_{k}(s) \bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(s,u_{ k}(s), D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{1}}u_{ k}(s),D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{2}}u_{ k}(s), \ldots,D_{0^{+}}^{\mu_{n-2}}u_{ k}(s),Au^{(n-2)}_{k}(s) \bigr) \bigr]\,ds\biggr\} , \\ &k=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$
and we have \(\|u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=\| I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{k}-I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star}\|\rightarrow 0\) as \(k\rightarrow\infty\), the convergence rate is
$$\bigl\Vert u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\bigr\Vert = \bigl\Vert I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{k}-I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star} \bigr\Vert =o\bigl(1-r^{\sigma^{k}}\bigr), $$
r is a constant, \(0< r<1\), and dependent on \(u_{0}\), where \(u_{\lambda }^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)\), and we easily get
$$v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t) =I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int _{0}^{1}H(t,s)g\bigl(s,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(s), I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{1}}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(s),\ldots ,I_{0^{+}}^{n-2-\eta_{m-2}}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(s)\bigr)\,ds \biggr), $$
so by \(u_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star }(t)\), we have
$$ v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2} \biggl(\mu \int _{0}^{1}H(t,s)g\bigl(s,u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s),D_{0^{+}}^{\eta _{1}}u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s), \ldots, D_{0^{+}}^{\eta_{m-2}}u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s)\bigr) \,ds \biggr). $$
(3.22)
By (3.3), (3.22) , for any \(t\in[0,1]\), we easily get
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}t^{\alpha-1}\leq u_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{n-2}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(t) \leq \frac{D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha)}t^{\alpha-1}, \\& \frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)\mu}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{D\Gamma(\alpha)}\biggr)^{\varsigma} t^{\beta-1} \int_{0}^{1}\theta_{2}(s)s^{\varsigma(\alpha -1)}g(s,1,1, \ldots,1)\,ds \\& \quad \leq v_{\lambda}^{\star }(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{m-2}y_{\lambda}^{\star}(t) \\& \quad \leq\frac{\Gamma(\beta-m+2)M_{2}\mu}{\Gamma(\beta)}\biggl(\frac {D\Gamma(\alpha-n+2)}{\Gamma(\alpha-\eta_{m-2})}+1\biggr) ^{\varsigma}t^{\beta-1} \\& \qquad {}\times\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1,1,\ldots,1) \,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, the proof of Theorem 3.1 is completed. □

Remark 3.1

Compared with previous work [23, 25], the fractional orders are involved not only in the nonlinearity f but also in the nonlinearity g and the uniqueness positive solution of equation (1.1) is dependent on eigenvalue λ. Moreover, compared with [25], an iterative sequence and the convergence rate are also given.

4 Example

Example 4.1

Consider the following boundary value problem:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} -D_{0+}^{\frac{5}{2}} u(t)=\lambda f(t,u(t), D_{0^{+}}^{\frac{1}{2}}u(t),v(t)), \quad 0< t< 1, \\ -D_{0+}^{\frac{3}{2}} v(t)=\mu g(t,u(t)),\quad 0< t< 1, \\ u(0)=u'(0)=0, \qquad u'(1)=\int_{0}^{\eta}u'(s)\,dA(s), \\ v(0)=0,\qquad v(1)=\int_{0}^{\vartheta}v(s)\,dB(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(4.1)
where \(\alpha=\frac{5}{2}\), \(\beta=\frac{3}{2}\), \(h(s)=a(s)=1\), \(\eta =\vartheta=\frac{3}{4}\), \(\chi=\tau=1\). Let \(u(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{1}x(t)\), \(v(t)=v(t)\), the equation can be changed to the following:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D_{0+}^{\frac{1}{2}} x(t)+\lambda f(t,I_{0^{+}}^{1}x(t),I^{\frac {1}{2}}_{0^{+}}x(t),v(t))=0, \quad 0< t< 1, \\ D_{0+}^{\frac{3}{2}} v(t)+\mu g(t,I_{0^{+}}^{1}x(t))=0, \quad 0< t< 1, \\ x(0)=0,\qquad x(1)=\int_{0}^{\frac{3}{4}}x(s)\,dA(s), \\ v(0)=0,\qquad v(1)=\int_{0}^{\frac{3}{4}}v(s)\,dB(s), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(4.2)
and
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi(t,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})= \bigl(t^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\cos t\bigr)x_{1}^{\frac{1}{7}} +2tx_{2}^{\frac{1}{4}}+2x_{3}^{\frac{1}{8}}, \\& \psi(t,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=t^{-\frac{1}{2}}x_{1}^{-\frac{1}{4}} +x_{2}^{-\frac{1}{6}} +(2-t)x_{3}^{-\frac{1}{5}}, \\& g(t,u)=\bigl(3t+t^{2}\bigr)u^{\frac{3}{5}}+(t\sin t+t)u^{\frac{2}{3}}, \\& A(t)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 0,&t\in [0,\frac{1}{2} ), \\ 6,&t\in [\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{4} ), \\ 2,&t\in [\frac{3}{4},1 ], \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \\& B(t)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 0,&t\in [0,\frac{1}{2} ), \\ 4,&t\in [\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{4} ), \\ 1,&t\in [\frac{3}{4},1 ]. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
Hence,
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)= \int _{0}^{\frac{3}{4}}t^{\frac{1}{2}}\,dA(t) \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)}= 6\times \biggl(\frac{1}{2} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}}-4 \biggl(\frac {3}{4} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)}\approx 6\times0.7071-4\times0.8660 \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)}= 0.7786 \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\eta}\chi t^{\alpha-n+1}h(t)\,dA(t)}< 1, \\& \int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta-1}g(t)\,dB(t)= \int _{0}^{\frac{3}{4}}t^{\frac{1}{2}}\,dB(t) \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta-1}g(t)\,dB(t)}= 4\times \biggl(\frac{1}{2} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}}-3 \biggl(\frac {3}{4} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta-1}g(t)\,dB(t)}\approx 4\times0.7071-3\times0.8660 \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta-1}g(t)\,dB(t)}= 0.2304 \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{\vartheta}\iota t^{\beta-1}g(t)\,dB(t)}< 1. \end{aligned}$$
Moreover, for any \((t,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})\in(0,1)\times(0,\infty )^{3}\) and \(0< l<1\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \phi(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},lx_{3}) = \bigl(t^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\cos t\bigr) (lx_{1})^{\frac{1}{7}} +2t(lx_{2})^{\frac{1}{4}}+2(lx_{3})^{\frac{1}{8}} \\& \hphantom{\phi(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},lx_{3})}\geq l^{\frac{1}{4}} \bigl(\bigl(t^{-\frac{1}{2}}+ \cos t \bigr)x_{1}^{\frac{1}{7}}+2tx_{2}^{\frac{1}{4}} +2x_{3}^{\frac{1}{8}} \bigr) \\& \hphantom{\phi(t,lx_{1},lx_{2},lx_{3})} =l^{\frac{1}{4}}\phi(t,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}), \\& \psi\bigl(t,l^{-1}x_{1},l^{-1}x_{2},l^{-1}x_{3} \bigr) =t^{-\frac {1}{2}}\bigl(l^{-1}x_{1} \bigr)^{-\frac{1}{4}} +\bigl(l^{-1}x_{2} \bigr)^{-\frac{1}{6}} +(2-t) \bigl(l^{-1}x_{3} \bigr)^{-\frac{1}{5}} \\& \hphantom{\psi\bigl(t,l^{-1}x_{1},l^{-1}x_{2},l^{-1}x_{3} \bigr)}\geq l^{\frac{1}{4}} \bigl(t^{-\frac{1}{2}}x_{1}^{-\frac {1}{4}}+x_{2}^{-\frac{1}{6}} +(2-t)x_{3}^{-\frac{1}{5}} \bigr) \\& \hphantom{\psi\bigl(t,l^{-1}x_{1},l^{-1}x_{2},l^{-1}x_{3} \bigr)} =l^{\frac{1}{4}}\psi(t,x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}), \\& g(t,lu) =\bigl(3t+t^{2}\bigr) (lu)^{\frac{3}{5}}+(t \sin t+t) (lu)^{\frac{2}{3}} \\& \hphantom{g(t,lu)}\geq l^{\frac{2}{3}} \bigl(\bigl(3t+t^{2} \bigr)u^{\frac{3}{5}}+(t \sin t+t)u^{\frac{2}{3}} \bigr) \\& \hphantom{g(t,lu)}=l^{\frac{2}{3}}g(t,u). \end{aligned}$$
Noting \(\sigma=\frac{1}{4}\), \(\psi(s,1,1,1)=s^{-\frac{1}{2}}+3-s\), \(\phi(s,1,1,1)=s^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\cos s+2s+2\), \(g(s,1)=4s+s\sin s+s^{2}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)} \psi (s,1,1,1)\,ds \leq \int_{0}^{1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)}\psi(s,1,1,1)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)}\psi (s,1,1,1)\,ds} = \int_{0}^{1}s^{-\frac{1}{4}\times\frac{3}{2}}\bigl(s^{-\frac {1}{2}}+3-s \bigr)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}s^{-\sigma(\alpha-1)}\psi (s,1,1,1)\,ds}=8+\frac{24}{5}-\frac{8}{13}< +\infty, \\& \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1,1)\,ds \leq \int _{0}^{1}\phi(s,1,1,1)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1,1)\,ds}= \int_{0}^{1}\bigl(s^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\cos s+2s+2 \bigr)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\alpha-n+1}\phi(s,1,1,1)\,ds}=5+\sin1< +\infty, \\& \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1)\,ds \leq \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\frac {1}{2}}\bigl(4s+s\sin s+s^{2}\bigr)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1)\,ds}\leq \int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\frac{1}{2}} \bigl(s^{2}+4s+1\bigr)\,ds \\& \hphantom{\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)^{\beta-m+1}g(s,1)\,ds}=\frac{10}{3}< +\infty. \end{aligned}$$
Thus, the assumptions (S1)-(S4) of Theorem 3.1 hold. Then Theorem 3.1 implies that problem (4.1) has a unique solution. Furthermore, when \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\), \(\lambda_{0}\in (0,+\infty)\), we have
$$\bigl\Vert x_{\lambda}^{\star}-x_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star} \bigr\Vert \rightarrow0, $$
and \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies
$$x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}(t)\leq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}(t), \qquad x_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}(t)\neq x_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}(t). $$
Since \(\sigma=\frac{1}{4}\in(0,\frac{1}{2})\),
$$\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0}\bigl\Vert x_{\lambda}^{\star}\bigr\Vert =0,\qquad \lim_{\lambda \rightarrow+\infty}\bigl\Vert x_{\lambda}^{\star} \bigr\Vert =+\infty. $$
By \(u_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{\lambda}^{\star}(t) \), we can easily get:
  1. (1)

    \(\lambda_{0}\in(0,+\infty)\), \(\|u_{\lambda}^{\star }-u_{\lambda_{0}}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\), \(\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_{0}\).

     
  2. (2)

    If \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\), then \(0<\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}\) implies \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\leq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\), \(u_{\lambda_{1}}^{\star}\neq u_{\lambda_{2}}^{\star}\).

     
  3. (3)

    \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow0}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=0\), \(\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow+\infty}\|u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=+\infty\).

     
In addition, for any initial \(u_{0}=I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{ 0}\in Q_{e}\), we construct a successive sequence
$$\begin{aligned} x_{k+1}(t) =&\lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\bigl[\phi \bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{ k}(t),I^{\frac{1}{2}}_{0^{+}} x_{ k}(t),Ax_{ k}(t)\bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(t,I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{ k}(t),I^{\frac{1}{2}}_{0^{+}}x_{k}(t), Ax_{k}(t)\bigr)\bigr]\,ds,\quad k=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$
by \(u_{k+1}(t)=I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{k+1}(t) \), then
$$\begin{aligned} u_{k+1}(t) =&I_{0^{+}}^{1}\biggl\{ \lambda \int_{0}^{1}G(t,s)\bigl[\phi \bigl(s,u_{ k}(t), D_{0^{+}}^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{ k}(t),Au'_{ k}(t) \bigr) \\ &{}+\psi\bigl(s,u_{ k}(t), D_{0^{+}}^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{ k}(t),Au'_{ k}(t) \bigr)\bigr]\,ds\biggr\} ,\quad k=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$
and we have \(\|u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\|=\|I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{ k}-I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{\lambda}^{\star}\|\rightarrow0\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty\), and the convergence rate
$$\bigl\Vert u_{k}-u_{\lambda}^{\star}\bigr\Vert = \bigl\Vert I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{ k}-I_{0^{+}}^{1}x_{\lambda}^{\star} \bigr\Vert =o\bigl(1-r^{\sigma^{k}}\bigr), $$
r is a constant, \(0< r<1\), and dependent on \(u_{0}\). Moreover,
$$v_{\lambda}^{\star}(t)=\mu \int_{0}^{1}H(t,s)g\bigl(s,u_{\lambda}^{\star}(s) \bigr)\,ds. $$

5 Conclusions

In this paper, some existence results are obtained for the case where the nonlinearity is allowed to be singular in regard to not only the time variable but also the space variable and the fractional orders are involved in the nonlinearity of the boundary value problem (1.1). Moreover, our equation system contains many types of equation systems because there are many parameters in our equation system and the uniqueness of the positive solution of equation (1.1) is dependent on λ. An iterative sequence and convergence rate are given which are important for practical applications. The method which we used for the analysis in this paper is the fixed point theorem of a mixed monotone operator in cone.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referee for very important comments, which improved the results and the quality of the paper. The authors were supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11371221, 11571296).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematical Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong, 273165, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia

References

  1. Agarwal, RP, O’Regan, D, Stanek, S: Positive solutions for Dirichlet problems of singular nonlinear fractional differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 371, 57-68 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanek, S: The existence of positive solutions of singular fractional boundary value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1379-1388 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang, S: Positive solutions to singular boundary value problem for nonlinear fractional differential equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1300-1309 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo, L, Zhang, X: Existence of positive solutions for the singular fractional differential equations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 44, 215-228 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang, J, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Positive solutions for nonlinear fractional differential equations with boundary conditions involving Riemann-Stieltjes integrals. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 708192 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y, Lu, Y: The iterative solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 4680-4691 (2013) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y, Wiwatanapataphee, B: The spectral analysis for a singular fractional differential equation with a signed measure. Appl. Math. Comput. 257, 252-263 (2015) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang, J, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Positive solutions for second-order singular semipositone differential equations involving Stieltjes integral conditions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 696283 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wiwatanapataphee, B, Wu, Y: The eigenvalue for a class of singular p-Laplacian fractional differential equations involving the Riemann-Stieltjes integral boundary condition. Appl. Math. Comput. 235, 412-422 (2014) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, X, Liu, S, Jiang, W: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional functional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 9278-9285 (2011) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu, X, Jiang, D, Yuan, C: Multiple positive solutions for the boundary value problem of a nonlinear fractional differential equation. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 4676-4688 (2009) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: The eigenvalue problem for a singular higher fractional differential equation involving fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 8526-8536 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hao, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: On positive solutions of an m-point nonhomogeneous singular boundary value problem. Nonlinear Anal. 73, 2532-2540 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Rehman, M, Khan, R: Existence and uniqueness of solutions for multi-point boundary value problems for fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 23, 1038-1044 (2010) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Avery, RI, Peterson, AC: Three positive fixed points of nonlinear operators on order Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 42, 313-322 (2001) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodrich, C: Existence and uniqueness of solutions to a fractional difference equation with nonlocal conditions. Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 191-202 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Lakshmikantham, V, Vatsala, AS: Basic theory of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 69, 2677-2682 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang, X: Positive solutions for a class of singular fractional differential equation with infinite-point boundary value conditions. Appl. Math. Lett. 39, 22-27 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Wei, Z: A class of fourth order singular boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 153, 865-884 (2004) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhao, Y, Sun, S, Han, Z, Zhang, M: Positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 6950-6958 (2011) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo, D, Lakshmikantham, V: Coupled fixed points of nonlinear operators with applications. Nonlinear Anal. 11, 623-632 (1987) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Bai, Z, Lv, H: Positive solutions of boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 311, 2761-2767 (2005) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang, X, Liu, L: The uniqueness of positive solution for a singular fractional differential system involving derivatives. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18, 1400-1409 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Bai, Z, Sun, W: Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for singular fractional boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 63, 1369-1381 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: The uniqueness of positive solution for a fractional order model of turbulent flow in a porous medium. Appl. Math. Lett. 37, 26-33 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, Y, Liu, L, Zhang, X, Wu, Y: Positive solutions of an abstract fractional semipositone differential system model for bioprocesses of HIV infection. Appl. Math. Comput. 258, 312-324 (2015) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Math. Sci. Eng. Academic Press, San Diego (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, KS, Ross, B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1993) MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Kilbas, A, Trujillo, J: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, X: Positive solutions for singular higher-order fractional differential equations with nonlocal conditions. J. Appl. Math. Comput. (2015). doi:10.1007/s12190-014-0824-z MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Guo, D, Cho, Y, Zhu, J: Partial Ordering Methods in Nonlinear Problems. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2004) MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Cao, Z, Jiang, D, Yuan, C: Existence and uniqueness of solutions for singular integral equation. Positivity 12, 725-732 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Guo et al. 2016

Advertisement