Skip to main content

Advertisement

Boundary Value Problems
Boundary Value Problems Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

A fourth-order elliptic Riemann type problem in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\)

Boundary Value Problems20162016:143

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0656-x

©  Gu 2016

  • Received: 18 March 2016
  • Accepted: 29 July 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

This article is concerned with a fourth-order elliptic equation i.e., \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) (\(\kappa>0\)) coupled by Riemann boundary value conditions in Clifford analysis. In the framework of a Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\), we obtain factorizations of the fourth-order elliptic equation and construct the explicit expressions of higher-order kernel functions. Some integral representation formulas and properties of the null solution of the fourth-order elliptic equations in Clifford analysis are presented. Based on these integral representation formulas, the boundary behavior of some singular integral operators, and the Clifford analytic approach, we prove that the fourth-order elliptic Riemann type problem in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) is solvable. The explicit representation formula of the solution is also established.

Keywords

  • Clifford analysis
  • Riemann type problem
  • fourth-order elliptic equations
  • micro-electro-mechanical systems

MSC

  • 30G35
  • 45J05

1 Introduction

Fourth-order elliptic equations have become a very important and useful area of mathematics over the last few decades, which is caused both by the intensive development of the theory of partial differential equations and their applications in various fields of physics and engineering such as theory of elasticity, micro-electro-mechanical systems, bi-harmonic systems, and so on. We refer to [1–10]. Recently the fourth-order elliptic equations
$$ B\Delta^{2}[u]-T\Delta[u]=0 \quad (B>0, T>0), $$
arise in the modeling of micro-electro-mechanical systems; see [5, 6]. The equations combining bi-harmonic equations with harmonic equations can be rewritten as
$$ \bigl(\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u]=0, $$
(1.1)
with \(\kappa=\sqrt{\frac{T}{B}}\).

The Riemann type problem is one of the famous problems in complex analysis and Clifford analysis; see [2–4, 11–23]. It is natural and important to study fourth-order elliptic equations coupled by the Riemann boundary conditions in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) (\(n\geq3\)). In general, two methods are used to deal with higher-order boundary value problems. One approach is to transform the boundary value problems for k-regular functions and poly-harmonic functions into equivalent boundary value problems for regular functions in Clifford analysis by the Almansi type decomposition theorem [15]. The other is to make use of higher-order integral representation formulas and a Clifford algebra approach [3, 4, 10]. Obviously, the first method fails to solve a system of the fourth-order elliptic equation i.e., \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)u=0\), coupled by the Riemann boundary conditions. Using the second method, we need to investigate factorizations of the fourth-order elliptic operator in the framework of a Clifford algebra. Furthermore, we will construct higher-order kernels. The key idea is to choose an appropriate framework of the Clifford algebra. A lot of boundary value problems for some functions with the Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{n,0})\) (\(n\geq3\)) have been studied; for example, see [2, 3, 11–13, 15, 16, 24]. However, we fail to obtain factorizations of the fourth-order elliptic equation \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)u=0\) (\(\kappa>0\)) using the Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{n,0})\). In this article, using a Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\), we get the decomposition of the fourth-order elliptic operator i.e., \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)\), and, moreover, construct higher-order kernel functions, which is different from [17, 25] due to choosing different Clifford algebra.

The article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some basic facts about the Clifford analysis needed in the sequel. In Section 3, in the framework of the Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\), we construct the explicit expressions of the kernel functions and obtain some integral representation formulas, we study some properties of null solutions for the fourth-order elliptic equations \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)u=0\), for instance, the mean value formula, the Painlevé principle, and so on. Section 4, on the basis of the above results, considers a Riemann boundary value problem for the fourth-order elliptic equation.

2 Preliminaries and notations

Let \(V_{3,3}\) be an 3-dimensional real linear space with basis \(\{ e_{1}, e_{2}, e_{3}\}\), \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\) be the Clifford algebra over \(V_{3,3}\) and the 8-dimensional real linear space with basis
$$ \bigl\{ e_{A}, A=\{l_{1},\ldots,l_{r}\}\in \mathcal{P}N, 1\leq l_{1}< \cdots < l_{r}\leq3\bigr\} , $$
where N stands for the set \(\{1, 2, 3\}\) and \(\mathcal{P}N\) denotes the family of all order-preserving subsets of N in the above way. We denote \(e_{\emptyset}\) by \(e_{0}\) and \(e_{A}\) by \(e_{l_{1}\cdots l_{r}}\) for \(A=\{l_{1},\ldots,l_{r}\}\in \mathcal{P}N\). The product on \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\) is defined by
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} e_{A}e_{B}=(-1)^{n((A\cap B)\setminus N)}(-1)^{P(A,B)}e_{A\Delta B}, & \text{if }A, B\in\mathcal {P}N, \\ \lambda\mu=\sum_{A,B\in\mathcal{P}N}\lambda_{A}\mu _{B}e_{A}e_{B}, & \text{if }\lambda=\sum_{A\in\mathcal{P}N}\lambda_{A}e_{A}, \mu=\sum_{B\in\mathcal{P}N}\mu_{B}e_{B}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(n(A)\) is the cardinal number of the set A, the number \(P(A,B)=\sum_{j\in B}P(A,j)\), \(P(A,j)=n\{i,i\in A,i>j\}\), the symmetric difference set \(A\Delta B\) is order-preserving in the above way, and \(\lambda_{A}\in\mathbb{R}\) is the coefficient of the \(e_{A}\)-component of the Clifford number λ. It follows from the multiplication rule above that \(e_{0}\) is the identity element written now as 1 and, in particular, \(e_{i}e_{j}+e_{j}e_{i}=2\delta_{ij}\), \(i, j=1,2,3\). Thus \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\) is a real linear, associative, but non-commutative algebra. An involution is defined by
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \overline{e}_{A}=(-1)^{\frac{n(A)(n(A)+3)}{2}}e_{A}, & \text{if }A\in \mathcal{P}N, \\ \overline{\lambda}=\sum_{A\in\mathcal{P}N}\lambda_{A}\overline {e}_{A}, & \text{if }\lambda=\sum_{A\in\mathcal{P}N}\lambda_{A}e_{A}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(2.1)

The norm of λ is defined by \(\|\lambda\|=(\sum_{A\in \mathcal{P}N}|\lambda_{A}|^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}\). Throughout this article, suppose that Ω is an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, we denote \(\Omega^{+}=\Omega\), \(\Omega^{-}=\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}\). We now introduce the Dirac operator \(D=\sum_{i=1}^{3}e_{i}\frac {\partial}{\partial x_{i}}\). In particular, we have \(DD=\Delta\) where Δ is the Laplacian over \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). A function \(u:\Omega\mapsto \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\) is said to be left monogenic if it satisfies the equation \(D[u](\mathbf{x})=0\) for each \(\mathbf{x}\in\Omega\). A similar definition can be given for right monogenic functions.

Denote
$$ z_{j}=x_{j}e_{0}-x_{1}e_{1}e_{j}, \quad j=2,3, $$
and
$$ V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{p!}\sum_{\pi (l_{r},\ldots,l_{p})}z_{l_{1}} \cdots z_{l_{p}}, $$
where \((l_{1},\ldots,l_{p})\in\{2,3\}^{p}\), the sum is taken over all permutations with repetition of the sequence \((l_{1},\ldots,l_{p})\). In particular we define \(V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})=1\) for \(p=0\) and \(V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})=0\) for \(p<0\).

Lemma 2.1

[26]

Let \(C_{j,p}\) and \(V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})\) be as above, then for \(j\in\mathbf{N}^{*}\),
$$ D\bigl[C_{j,p}\mathbf{x}^{j}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}( \mathbf {x})\bigr]=C_{j-1,p}\mathbf{x}^{j-1}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}( \mathbf{x}), $$
(2.2)
where \(\mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^{3}x_{i}e_{i}\),
$$ C_{j,p}=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 1, & j=0, \\ \frac{1}{2^{[\frac{j}{2}]}([\frac{j}{2}])!\prod_{\mu=0}^{[\frac {j-1}{2}]}(3+2p+2\mu)}, & j\in\mathbf{N}^{*}=\mathbf {N}\setminus\{0\}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
In the following, we define
$$ \Lambda(r,u)\triangleq\max_{\|\mathbf{x}\|\leq r}\bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf {x})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} ,\qquad M(r,u)\triangleq\max_{\|\mathbf{x}\|=r}\bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} . $$

Lemma 2.2

[4, 27]

Let \(D[u]=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) and \(\liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty }\frac{M(r, u)}{r^{m}}=L<\infty\), \(m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}\). Then
$$ u(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{p=0}^{m} \sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p})}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}. $$
(2.3)

For more information as regards the properties of Dirac operators and left monogenic functions can be found in [2, 3, 27–29].

3 Some integral representation formulas in Clifford analysis

The fourth-order elliptic partial differential operator \(\Delta ^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\), for \(\kappa>0\), corresponds to the fourth-order elliptic equation:
$$ \bigl(\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u]=0. $$
(3.1)
Using the multiplication rule on the Clifford algebra \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\), equation (3.1) may also be written as
$$DDL_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}[u]=DDL_{-\kappa}L_{\kappa}[u]=L_{-\kappa }L_{\kappa}DD[u]=L_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}DD[u]=0, $$
where \(L_{\kappa}=D+\kappa\) and \(L_{-\kappa}=D-\kappa\).

Lemma 3.1

[7, 8]

Let
$$ E(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}. $$
(3.2)
Then the kernel function \(E(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\) is the fundamental solution to (3.1) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\).
Let
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} H_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi}\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\| ^{3}}, \\ H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-\frac{1}{4\pi}\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}, \\ H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} [(\frac{\mathbf {x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} +\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|})(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}-1)+\kappa \frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|} ], \\ H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-E(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa ^{2}}\frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.3)
and
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi} [\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\| \mathbf{x}\|^{3}} +\kappa\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}+\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf {x}\|} ]e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}, \\ E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-\frac{1}{4\pi}\frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\| }}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}, \\ E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} [\frac{\mathbf {x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}-1) +\kappa\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\| } ], \\ E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-E(\kappa, \mathbf{x})=-\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa ^{2}}\frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.4)
where \(\kappa>0\), \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\{0\}\).

Lemma 3.2

Let \(H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\) and \(E_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\) be as in (3.3) and (3.4), \(i=1,2,3,4\). Then
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} L_{-\kappa}[H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{-\kappa}=H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{\kappa}[H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{\kappa}=H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{-\kappa}[E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{-\kappa}=E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{\kappa}[E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{\kappa}=0, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
and
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D[E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]D=E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ D[E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]D=E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ D[H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]D=H_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ D[H_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]D=0, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
here \(\kappa>0\), \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\{0\}\).

Remark 3.3

Let
$$ H_{3}^{*}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})= \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \biggl[\biggl(\frac {\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} -\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{x}\|}\biggr) \bigl(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}-1\bigr)+\kappa \frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|} \biggr] $$
(3.5)
and
$$ E_{1}^{*}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})= \frac{1}{4\pi} \biggl[\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\| \mathbf{x}\|^{3}} +\kappa\frac{\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}-\kappa \frac{1}{\|\mathbf {x}\|} \biggr]e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}. $$
(3.6)
When \(H_{3}^{*}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\), \(E_{1}^{*}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\) replace \(H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\), \(E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})\) in (3.3), (3.4), respectively, we have the following results:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} L_{\kappa}[H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{\kappa}=H^{*}_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{-\kappa}[H^{*}_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[H^{*}_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{-\kappa}=H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{\kappa}[E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{\kappa}=E^{*}_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x}), \\ L_{-\kappa}[E^{*}_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{x})]=[E^{*}_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf {x})]L_{-\kappa}=0. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.7)
Let Ω be an open non-empty subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary, \(u(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{A}e_{A}u_{A}(\mathbf{x})\), where \(u_{A}(\mathbf{x})\) are real functions. \(u(\mathbf{x})\) is called a Hölder continuous function on Ω̅ if the following condition is satisfied:
$$ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{x}_{1})-u(\mathbf{x}_{2})\bigr\Vert = \biggl[\sum_{A}\bigl\Vert u_{A}(\mathbf{x}_{1})-u_{A}( \mathbf{x}_{2})\bigr\Vert \biggr]^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq C\Vert \mathbf{x}_{1}-\mathbf{x}_{2}\Vert ^{\alpha}, $$
where, for any \(\mathbf{x}_{1}, \mathbf{x}_{2}\in\overline{\Omega}\), \(\mathbf{x}_{1}\neq\mathbf{x}_{2}\), \(0<\alpha\leq1\), C is a positive constant independent of \(\mathbf{x}_{1}\), \(\mathbf{x}_{2}\).

Lemma 3.4

Let \(f, g\in C^{1}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\). Then
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\partial\Omega}f\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g =& \int _{\Omega }[f]L_{\kappa}g\,dV+ \int _{\Omega}fL_{-\kappa}[g]\,dV \\ =& \int _{\Omega}[f]L_{-\kappa}g\,dV+ \int _{\Omega}fL_{\kappa }[g]\,dV, \end{aligned}$$
where dV denotes Lebesgue volume measure, dσ stands for \(\operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})\)-valued 2-differential form.

Proof

From Stokes’ theorem in Clifford analysis in [29], the results can be directly proved. □

Theorem 3.5

Suppose that Ω is an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\). Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{i}(\kappa , \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}- \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}+ \int _{\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigl(\Delta ^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} u(\mathbf{x}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega, \\ 0, & \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(3.8)
where \(H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\) (\(i=1,2,3,4\)) are as in (3.3).

Proof

Let \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}\). Using Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 3.2, we get
$$\begin{aligned}& \int _{\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigl(\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \int _{\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x})L_{\kappa }[L_{-\kappa}\Delta u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {} - \int _{\Omega} \bigl[H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x})\bigr]L_{-\kappa}\cdot L_{-\kappa }\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {} - \int _{\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV. \end{aligned}$$
(3.9)
Assume
$$ I_{1}= \int _{\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV. $$
Applying Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 3.2 once again, we continue to calculate the integral \(I_{1}\) and get
$$\begin{aligned} I_{1} =& \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta [u](\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\Omega} \bigl[H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigr]L_{\kappa}\cdot\Delta[u](\mathbf {y})\,dV \\ =& \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta [u](\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\Omega} H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ =& \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta [u](\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}D[u](\mathbf {y}) \\ &{} + \int _{\Omega} \bigl[H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigr]D\cdot D[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ =& \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta [u](\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}D[u](\mathbf {y}) \\ &{}+ \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}u(\mathbf{y}), \end{aligned}$$
(3.10)
From (3.9) and (3.10), in this case, the result follows.
Now, let \(\mathbf{x}\in\Omega\) and take \(r>0\) such that \(B(\mathbf{x}, r)\subset\Omega\). Invoking the previous case, we may write
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial(\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r))}H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \quad {} - \int _{\partial(\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r))}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf {y}) \\& \quad {} + \int _{\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigl(\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV=0. \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)
Here we take the limits for \(r\rightarrow0\). As regards the weak singularity of \(H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\), it follows that
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{r\rightarrow0} \int _{\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigl(\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta \bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \int _{\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}) \bigl(\Delta ^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta\bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV. \end{aligned}$$
(3.12)
Furthermore we write
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial(\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r))}H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}- \int _{\partial(\Omega\setminus B(\mathbf{x}, r))}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa }\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \quad =\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega }H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}- \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}-\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf {x}, r)}H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}+ \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}). \end{aligned}$$
(3.13)
We denote
$$\begin{aligned} I_{2} \triangleq&-\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, r)}H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+ \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{y}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}). \end{aligned}$$
Applying the Stokes formula and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem, we have
$$ \lim_{r\rightarrow0} I_{2}=-u(\mathbf{x}). $$
(3.14)
Combining (3.11) with (3.12)-(3.14), we get the desired result. □

Theorem 3.6

Suppose that Ω is an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\). Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}u(\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}+ \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad{} - \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}DL_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}+ \int _{\Omega}E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\Delta \bigl(\Delta -\kappa^{2}\bigr)[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\& \quad = \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} u(\mathbf{x}), &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega, \\ 0, & \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(3.15)
where \(E_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\) (\(i=1,2,3,4\)) are as in (3.4).

Proof

The result can be similarly proved to Theorem 3.5. □

Applying Theorems 3.5 and 3.6, we directly have the following results.

Theorem 3.7

Suppose that Ω is an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), and \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) in Ω. Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{i}(\kappa ,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}- \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \quad = \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} u(\mathbf{x}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega, \\ 0, & \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(3.16)
where \(H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\) (\(i=1,2,3,4\)) are as in (3.3).

Theorem 3.8

Suppose that Ω is an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), and \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) in Ω. Then
$$\begin{aligned}& \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{1}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}u(\mathbf{y}) - \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{2}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}+ \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{3}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \qquad {}- \int _{\partial\Omega}E_{4}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}DL_{\kappa}L_{-\kappa}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \quad = \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} u(\mathbf{x}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega, \\ 0, & \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(3.17)
where \(E_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\) (\(i=1,2,3,4\)) are as in (3.4).

In this article, as usual dS denotes the Lebesgue surface measure. Using Theorem 3.7 or 3.8, we have the following result.

Corollary 3.9

Suppose that \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u](\mathbf{x})=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). Then
$$\begin{aligned} u(\mathbf{x}) =&\frac{1+\kappa R}{4\pi R^{2}(1+\kappa R+\frac{\kappa^{2} R^{2}}{3})} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)} u(\mathbf{y})\,dS \\ &{}+\frac{\kappa^{2}}{4\pi R(1+\kappa R+\frac{\kappa^{2}R^{2}}{3})} \int _{B(\mathbf{x}, R)}u(\mathbf{y})\,dV +\frac{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{R}{\kappa}+\frac{R^{2}}{3}-\frac {e^{\kappa R}}{\kappa^{2}}}{1+\kappa R+\frac{\kappa^{2}R^{2}}{3}}\Delta [u]( \mathbf{x}). \end{aligned}$$

Proof

For arbitrary \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\), Theorem 3.7 and Stokes’ formula imply
$$\begin{aligned} u(\mathbf{x}) =&\frac{1}{4\pi R^{2}} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}u(\mathbf{y})\,dS +\frac{1}{4\pi R} \int _{B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ &{}+\biggl(\frac{e^{-\kappa R}-1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}R^{2}}+\frac{e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi \kappa R}\biggr) \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\Delta[u](\mathbf {y})\,dS \\ &{}+\frac{e^{-\kappa R}-1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}R} \int _{B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\Delta^{2}[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV. \end{aligned}$$
(3.18)
Using the mean value formula for harmonic functions and the condition \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\), from (3.18), we have
$$\begin{aligned} u(\mathbf{x}) =&e^{-\kappa R}\frac{1+\kappa R}{4\pi R^{2}} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}u(\mathbf{y})\,dS +e^{-\kappa R} \frac{\kappa^{2}}{4\pi R} \int _{B(\mathbf{x}, R)}u(\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ &{}+\biggl(\frac{1-e^{\kappa R}}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{R}{\kappa}+\frac {R^{2}}{3} \biggr)e^{-\kappa R}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x}) \\ &{}-\biggl(1-e^{\kappa R}+\kappa R+\frac{R^{2}\kappa^{2}}{3}\biggr)e^{-\kappa R}u( \mathbf{x}). \end{aligned}$$
(3.19)
Thus the result follows. □

Theorem 3.10

Suppose that \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) and \(\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l<\infty\), \(m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}\). Then
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} \liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{M(r, D[u])}{r^{m-1}}< \infty, \\ \Delta[u](\infty)=0, \\ L_{\pm\kappa}\Delta[u](\infty)=0. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.20)

Proof

For arbitrary \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\), by Corollary 3.9, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \Delta[u](\mathbf{x}) =&\frac{1+\kappa R+\frac{\kappa^{2}R^{2}}{3}}{\frac {1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{R}{\kappa}+\frac{R^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{\kappa R}}{\kappa^{2}}}u(\mathbf{x}) \\ &{}- \frac{(1+\kappa R)}{4\pi R^{2}(\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{R}{\kappa }+\frac{R^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{\kappa R}}{\kappa^{2}})} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)} u(\mathbf{y})\,dS \\ &{}-\frac{\kappa^{2}}{4\pi R(\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{R}{\kappa}+\frac {R^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{\kappa R}}{\kappa^{2}})} \int _{B(\mathbf{x}, R)}u(\mathbf{y})\,dV. \end{aligned}$$
(3.21)
Taking \(R=\|\mathbf{x}\|\) in (3.21), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert \Delta[u](\mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \leq&\biggl\vert \frac{1+\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|+\frac {\kappa^{2}\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}{3}}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}} +\frac{\|\mathbf{x}\|}{\kappa}+\frac{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}{3}-\frac {e^{\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{1+\kappa\|\mathbf{x}\|}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{\| \mathbf{x}\|}{\kappa}+\frac{\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{\kappa\| \mathbf{x}\|}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \max_{\|\mathbf{y}\|\leq2\|\mathbf{x}\|} \bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{y})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{\kappa^{2}\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}{\frac{3}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac {3\|\mathbf{x}\|}{\kappa}+\|\mathbf{x}\|^{2}-3\frac{e^{\kappa\|\mathbf {x}\|}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \max_{\|\mathbf{y}\|\leq2\|\mathbf{x}\|} \bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{y})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
(3.22)
Denoting \(\|\mathbf{x}\|=r\), we get from (3.22)
$$\begin{aligned} \max_{\|\mathbf{x}\|=r}\bigl\{ \bigl\Vert \Delta[u]( \mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} \leq& \biggl\vert \frac{1+\kappa r+\frac{\kappa^{2}r^{2}}{3}}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}} +\frac{r}{\kappa}+\frac{r^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}} \biggr\vert \max_{\|\mathbf{x}\|=r}\bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{1+r\kappa}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{r}{\kappa}+\frac {r^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \max_{\|\mathbf{y}\|\leq2r} \bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf {y})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{\kappa^{2}r^{2}}{\frac{3}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{3r}{\kappa }+r^{2}-3\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \max_{\|\mathbf{y}\|\leq2r} \bigl\{ \bigl\Vert u(\mathbf {y})\bigr\Vert \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
(3.23)
The inequality (3.23) can be rewritten as
$$\begin{aligned} M\bigl(r,\Delta[u]\bigr) \leq&\biggl\vert \frac{r^{m}+\kappa r^{m+1}+\frac{\kappa ^{2}r^{m+2}}{3}}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}} +\frac{r}{\kappa}+\frac{r^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}} \biggr\vert \frac{M(r,u)}{r^{m}} \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{r^{m}+r^{m+1}\kappa}{\frac{1}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{r}{\kappa }+\frac{r^{2}}{3}-\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \frac{\Lambda(2r,u)}{r^{m}} \\ &{}+\biggl\vert \frac{\kappa^{2}r^{m+2}}{\frac{3}{\kappa^{2}}+\frac{3r}{\kappa }+r^{2}-3\frac{e^{r\kappa}}{\kappa^{2}}}\biggr\vert \frac{\Lambda(2r,u)}{r^{m}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.24)
In view of (3.23) and \(\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac {\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l<\infty\), when \(r\rightarrow\infty\), we get \(\Delta[u](\infty)=0\).
Using Lemma 3.13 in [19] and \((\Delta-\kappa^{2})\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=0\), we obtain
$$ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\infty)=0 $$
(3.25)
and
$$ L_{\kappa}\Delta[u](\infty)=0. $$
(3.26)
From (3.25) and (3.26), we further obtain \(D^{3}[u](\infty)=0\).
We finally verify the remaining of the result of the theorem. For all \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\), from Theorem 3.7, Lemma 3.2, Remark 3.3, and Stokes’ formula it follows that
$$\begin{aligned} D[u](\mathbf{x}) =&\frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D[u]( \mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x},R)}\frac{1}{\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} \bigl(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1\bigr)\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{3}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x}, R)}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}} D^{3}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ =&\frac{3}{4\pi R^{3}} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x},R)}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}u(\mathbf{y}) + \frac{1}{4\pi R^{3}} \int_{B(\mathbf{x},R)}(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\Delta [u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ &{}+\frac{e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi R} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x},R)}\,d\sigma _{\mathbf{y}}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{3(e^{-\kappa R}-1)}{4\pi\kappa^{2}R^{3}} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf {x},R)}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{e^{-\kappa R}-1}{4\pi R^{3}} \int_{B(\mathbf{x},R)}(\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x})\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ &{}+\frac{3e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi\kappa R^{2}} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf {x},R)}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}+\frac{\kappa e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi R^{2}} \int_{B(\mathbf{x},R)}(\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x})\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ =&\frac{3}{4\pi R^{3}} \int _{\partial B(\mathbf{x},R)}\,d\sigma _{\mathbf{y}}u(\mathbf{y}) +\biggl( \frac{1+R\kappa}{4\pi R^{3}}\biggr)e^{-\kappa R} \int _{B(\mathbf {x},R)}(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})\,dV \\ &{}+\biggl[\frac{e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi R}+\frac{3(e^{-\kappa R}-1)}{4\pi\kappa ^{2}R^{3}}+\frac{3e^{-\kappa R}}{4\pi\kappa R^{2}}\biggr] \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x},R)}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}). \end{aligned}$$
(3.27)
Taking \(R=\|\mathbf{x}\|\) in (3.27), in view of the maximum principle of the modified Helmholtz equation in [7, 18], it immediately follows that
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert D[u](\mathbf{x})\bigr\Vert \leq&24 \frac{\Lambda(2\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,u)}{\Vert \mathbf {x}\Vert } +\frac{e^{-\kappa \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert }}{3}\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert M\bigl(2\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,\Delta[u]\bigr) \\ &{}+\kappa\frac{e^{-\kappa \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert }}{3}\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ^{2}M\bigl(2 \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,\Delta[u]\bigr) +e^{-\kappa \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert }\Vert \mathbf{x} \Vert M\bigl(2\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,\Delta[u]\bigr) \\ &{}+\frac{3(1-e^{-\kappa \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert })}{\kappa^{2}\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert } M\bigl(2\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,\Delta[u]\bigr)+ \frac{3e^{-\kappa \Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert }}{\kappa }M\bigl(2\Vert \mathbf{x}\Vert ,\Delta[u]\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.28)
Denoting \(\|\mathbf{x}\|=r\), we conclude from (3.28)
$$\begin{aligned} M\bigl(r,D[u]\bigr) \leq&24\frac{\Lambda(2r,u)}{r}+e^{-\kappa r} \biggl(\frac{4r}{3}+\frac {\kappa r^{2}}{3}+\frac{3}{\kappa}\biggr)M\bigl(2r, \Delta[u]\bigr) \\ &{} +\frac{3(1-e^{-\kappa r})}{\kappa^{2} r}M\bigl(2r,\Delta[u]\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.29)
Then by (3.29), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{M(r,D[u])}{r^{m-1}} \leq&24\cdot\frac{\Lambda(2r,u)}{r^{m}} + \frac{e^{-\kappa r}}{r^{m-1}}\biggl(\frac{4r}{3}+\frac{\kappa r^{2}}{3}+\frac {3}{\kappa} \biggr)M\bigl(2r,\Delta[u]\bigr) \\ &{}+\frac{3(1-e^{-\kappa r})}{\kappa^{2} r^{m}}M\bigl(2r,\Delta[u]\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.30)
Applying the maximum principle of the modified Helmholtz equation and the condition \(\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l<\infty\), we have \(\liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac {M(r,D[u])}{r^{m-1}}<\infty\). The proof is completed. □
Next, denote some integral operators as follows:
$$\begin{aligned}& (\mathcal{F}u) (\mathbf{x})\triangleq\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{(\mathcal{F}u)(\mathbf{x})\triangleq{}}{}- \int_{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in \mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega, \end{aligned}$$
(3.31)
$$\begin{aligned}& (\mathcal{S}u) (\mathbf{x})\triangleq\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{(\mathcal{S}u)(\mathbf{x})\triangleq{}}{}- \int_{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in \partial\Omega, \end{aligned}$$
(3.32)
where \(H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\) (\(i=1,2,3,4\)) are as in (3.3) and the above singular integral is taken in the principal sense.

Lemma 3.11

Let Ω be an open, bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) with Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(0<\alpha \leq1\). Then, for \(\mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega\),
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} \lim_{\substack{\mathbf{x}\rightarrow\mathbf{x}_{0}\in\partial\Omega\\ \mathbf{x}\in\Omega}} (\mathcal{F}u)(\mathbf{x})=\frac{u(\mathbf{x}_{0})}{2}+(\mathcal {S}u)(\mathbf{x}_{0}), \\ \lim_{\substack{\mathbf{x}\rightarrow\mathbf{x}_{0}\in\partial\Omega\\ \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\overline{\Omega}}} (\mathcal{F}u)(\mathbf{x})=-\frac{u(\mathbf{x}_{0})}{2}+(\mathcal {S}u)(\mathbf{x}_{0}). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.33)

Proof

Applying the Plemelj formulas with parameter (Theorem 2.3 in [10]), the result follows. □

In the following, we denote
$$ u^{\pm}(\mathbf{x})=\lim_{\substack{\mathbf{y}\rightarrow\mathbf{x}\in \partial\Omega\\ \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{\pm}}}u( \mathbf{y}), $$
(3.34)
where \(\Omega=\Omega^{+}\) and \(\Omega^{-}=\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus \overline{\Omega}\).

Theorem 3.12

Assume that Ω is an open, bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{3}\) with a Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega^{-}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega} ^{-}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\) and \(u(\mathbf{x})\) satisfies the following conditions:
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} (\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u](\mathbf{x})=0, \quad \textit{in }\mathbb {R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega, \\ u^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=u^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha_{1}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \quad \forall\mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ D[u]^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=D[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha_{2}}(\partial \Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \quad \forall\mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ \Delta[u]^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha _{3}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \quad \forall\mathbf{x}\in \partial\Omega, \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf {x})\in H^{\alpha_{4}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \quad \forall \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.35)
where \(0<\alpha_{i}\leq1\), \(i=1,2,3,4\), then \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa ^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\).

Proof

We only need to prove that for \(\forall\mathbf{x}_{0}\in\partial\Omega \), \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\). Taking a constant \(r>0\), \(B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)\) is an open ball with the center at \(\mathbf {x}_{0}\) and radius r such that \(\Omega\subset B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)\). It is clear that \(\partial\Omega \cup\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)\) is a Lyapunov boundary.

Let
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} u(\mathbf{x})=u^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=u^{-}(\mathbf{x}), \\ D[u](\mathbf{x})=D[u]^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=D[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x}), \\ \Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=\Delta[u]^{+}({\mathbf{x}})=\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf {x}), \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]^{+}(\mathbf {x})=L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x}), \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
here \(\mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega\). In view of Theorem 3.7, it follows that
$$\begin{aligned}& u(\mathbf{x}_{1})=\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial \Omega}H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{1})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{u(\mathbf{x}_{1})={}}{}- \int_{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{1})\,d\sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]( \mathbf{y}), \quad \mathbf {x}_{1}\in\Omega, \end{aligned}$$
(3.36)
$$\begin{aligned}& u(\mathbf{x}_{2})=\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int_{\partial\Omega \cup\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)} H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{2})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{u(\mathbf{x}_{2})={}}{}- \int_{\partial\Omega\cup\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa ,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{2})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta [u]( \mathbf{y}), \\& \hphantom{u(\mathbf{x}_{2})={}}\mathbf{x}_{2}\in B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r) \setminus\overline{\Omega}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.37)
Combining (3.36) with (3.37) and using Lemma 3.11, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& u^{+}(\mathbf{x}_{0})=\lim_{\mathbf{x}_{1}\rightarrow\mathbf {x}_{0}}u( \mathbf{x}_{1}) \\& \hphantom{u^{+}(\mathbf{x}_{0})}=\frac{u(\mathbf{x}_{0})}{2} +\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega}H_{i}(\kappa ,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{0})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{u^{+}(\mathbf{x}_{0})={}}{}- \int_{\partial\Omega}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{0})\,d\sigma _{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u]( \mathbf{y}), \end{aligned}$$
(3.38)
$$\begin{aligned}& u^{-}(\mathbf{x}_{0})=\lim_{\mathbf{x}_{2}\rightarrow\mathbf{x}_{0}} u( \mathbf{x}_{0}) \\& \hphantom{u^{-}(\mathbf{x}_{0})}=\frac{u(\mathbf{x}_{0})}{2} +\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega\cup \partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)} H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{0})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\& \hphantom{u^{-}(\mathbf{x}_{0})={}}{}- \int _{\partial\Omega\cup\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{0})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa }\Delta[u]( \mathbf{y}). \end{aligned}$$
(3.39)
From (3.38) and (3.39), we derive
$$\begin{aligned} u(\mathbf{x}_{0}) =&\sum_{i=1}^{3}(-1)^{i-1} \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)} H_{i}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}- \mathbf{x}_{0})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf {y}}D^{i-1}[u](\mathbf{y}) \\ &{}- \int_{\partial B(\mathbf{x}_{0}, r)}H_{4}(\kappa,\mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x}_{0})\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y}). \end{aligned}$$
(3.40)
Therefore \(\Delta(\Delta-\kappa^{2})[u](\mathbf{x}_{0})=0\), the result follows. □

Theorem 3.13

Let Ω be an open bounded non-empty subset of \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) with Lyapunov boundary ∂Ω, \(u\in C^{4}(\Omega^{-}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\cap C^{3}(\overline{\Omega}^{-}, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0\) in \(\Omega^{-}\), and
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} u({\mathbf{x}})\in H^{\alpha_{1}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ D[u](\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha_{2}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ \Delta[u](\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha_{3}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha_{4}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ \lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l< \infty , \quad m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
where \(0<\alpha_{i}\leq1\), \(i=1, 2, 3, 4\). Then
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} \liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{M(r, D[u])}{r^{m-1}}< \infty, \\ \Delta[u](\infty)=0, \\ L_{-\kappa}[u]\Delta(\infty)=0,\qquad L_{\kappa}\Delta[u](\infty)=0. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$

Proof

For \(\mathbf{y}\in\partial\Omega\), let
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} u(\mathbf{y})=-f_{1}(\mathbf{y}), \\ D[u](\mathbf{y})=-f_{2}(\mathbf{y}), \\ \Delta[u](\mathbf{y})=-f_{3}(\mathbf{y}), \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{y})=-f_{4}(\mathbf{y}). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
For \(\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega\), we get
$$ F(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{i=1}^{4}(-1)^{i-1} \int _{\partial\Omega} H_{i}(\kappa, \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})\,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{i}(\mathbf{y}) $$
and
$$ \widetilde{F}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} -F(\mathbf{x}) & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ u(\mathbf{x})-F(\mathbf{x}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
in view of Lemma 3.2, it is easy to check that \((\Delta ^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[\widetilde{F}]=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega\), combining Lemma 3.11, we get
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} [\widetilde{F}]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=[\widetilde{F}]^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}_{1}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ D[\widetilde{F}]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=D[\widetilde{F}]^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}_{2}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ \Delta[\widetilde{F}]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Delta[\widetilde{F}]^{-}(\mathbf {x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}_{3}}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})), \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[\widetilde{F}]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=L_{-\kappa}\Delta [\widetilde{F}]^{-}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}_{4}}(\partial \Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3})). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
Thus \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[\widetilde{F}]=0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) where we use Theorem 3.12. Obviously, \(\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,\widetilde{F}(\mathbf {x}))}{r^{m}}=l<\infty\), using Theorem 3.10, we arrive at
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} \liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{M(r, D[\widetilde {F}])}{r^{m-1}}< \infty, \\ \Delta[\widetilde{F}](\infty)=0, \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[\widetilde{F}](\infty)=0,\qquad L_{\kappa}\Delta[\widetilde {F}](\infty)=0. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.41)
For \(\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}\),
$$ \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} D[u](\mathbf{x})=D[\widetilde{F}](\mathbf{x}) \\ \hphantom{D[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{2}(\mathbf{y}) \\ \hphantom{D[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int _{\partial\Omega}[(\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} +\kappa\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| ^{2}}+\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|})e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|} -\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}] \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \\ \hphantom{D[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega }[\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} (e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1)+\kappa\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}} e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}]\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{4}(\mathbf {y}), \\ \Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=\Delta[\widetilde{F}](\mathbf{x}) \\ \hphantom{\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega} [\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+\kappa\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}} +\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{3}(\mathbf {y}) \\ \hphantom{\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega} \frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| }\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{4}(\mathbf{y}), \\ L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=L_{-\kappa}\Delta[\widetilde {F}](\mathbf{x}) \\ \hphantom{L_{-\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega} [\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+\kappa\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}} +\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}f_{4}(\mathbf{y}). \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(3.42)
Equations (3.41) and (3.42) imply that the result holds. □

4 Riemann type problem for the fourth-order elliptic equation

In this section we will find solutions to
$$\begin{aligned} \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} (\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta)[u]=0, \quad \text{in }\mathbb {R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega, \\ u^{+}(\mathbf{x})=u^{-}(\mathbf{x})A+g_{1}(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ D[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=D[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x})B+g_{2}(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ \Delta[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x})C+g_{3}(\mathbf{x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ L_{\kappa}\Delta[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=L_{\kappa}\Delta[u]^{-}(\mathbf {x})D+g_{4}(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \\ \lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l< \infty, \quad m\in\mathbf{N}^{*}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(4.1)
where A, B, C, D are invertible Clifford constants and \(g_{1}(\mathbf{x}), g_{2}(\mathbf{x}), g_{3}(\mathbf{x}), g_{4}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\alpha}(\partial\Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(0<\alpha\leq1\), \(\kappa>0\).

Theorem 4.1

The Riemann type problem (4.1) is solvable and the solution can be written as
$$ u(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{i=1}^{4}u_{i}( \mathbf{x}), $$
(4.2)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& u_{1}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac {e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega ^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac {e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y})D^{-1}, & \mathbf{x}\in \Omega^{-}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(4.3)
$$\begin{aligned}& u_{2}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}(\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} -\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|})(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1)\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \\ \quad {}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}} e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}(\frac {\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} -\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|})(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1)\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf {y})C^{-1} \\ \quad {} +\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}} e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{3}(\mathbf{y})C^{-1}, & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(4.4)
$$\begin{aligned}& u_{3}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{1}{\| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf {y}) \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}C_{1,p-1}\mathbf{x}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf {x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}^{1}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{1}{\| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf {y})B^{-1} \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}C_{1,p-1}\mathbf{x} V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf{x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}^{1}B^{-1}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(4.5)
$$\begin{aligned}& u_{4}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{y}) \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=0}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p})}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{y})A^{-1} \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=0}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p})}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}(\mathbf{x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p}}A^{-1}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . \end{aligned}$$
(4.6)
and
$$\begin{aligned}& \tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{x})=g_{3}(\mathbf{x})+ \frac{1}{4\pi} \int _{\partial\Omega} \frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| }\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}( \mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+D^{-1}C\bigr),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \end{aligned}$$
(4.7)
$$\begin{aligned}& \tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} \bigl(e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1\bigr)\,d \sigma_{\mathbf {y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+D^{-1}B\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+D^{-1}B\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}-\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}} e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}B \bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}-\frac{1}{4\pi} \int _{\partial\Omega}\biggl(\frac{\mathbf{y}-\mathbf {x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}-\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\biggr) e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}B\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}B\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+g_{2}(\mathbf{x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, \end{aligned}$$
(4.8)
$$\begin{aligned}& \tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})=\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \int _{\partial\Omega} \frac{e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}( \mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+D^{-1}A\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \int _{\partial\Omega}\biggl(\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}-\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \biggr) e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{3}( \mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}A\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}-\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}} \int _{\partial\Omega}\biggl(\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}-\kappa\frac{1}{\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \biggr) \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}A\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi\kappa} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{2}}e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d \sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+C^{-1}A \bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\frac{1}{4\pi} \int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{1}{\|\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}} \tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{y}) \bigl(-1+B^{-1}A\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum _{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}C_{1,p-1}\mathbf{x}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}( \mathbf {x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}^{1} \bigl(-1+B^{-1}A\bigr) \\& \hphantom{\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})={}}{}+g_{1}(\mathbf{x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial \Omega. \end{aligned}$$
(4.9)

Proof

Let \(u(\mathbf{x})\) be the solution of (4.1) for \(\mathbf {x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega\), we denote \(\omega(\mathbf{x})=L_{\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})\). Then
$$ \omega^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\omega^{-}( \mathbf{x})D+g_{4}(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega. $$
(4.10)
In view of Theorem 3.13, \((\Delta^{2}-\kappa^{2}\Delta )[u](\mathbf{x})=L_{-\kappa}L_{\kappa}\Delta[u](\mathbf{x})=0\), and \(\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\Lambda(r,u)}{r^{m}}=l<\infty \), we have
$$ \omega(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}[\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+ \frac{\kappa(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| ^{2}}+\frac{\kappa}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf {y}), & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}[\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+ \frac{\kappa(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| ^{2}}+\frac{\kappa}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf {y})D^{-1}, & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
Let
$$ u_{1}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac {e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y}), &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega ^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi\kappa^{2}}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac {e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}-1}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|} \,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}g_{4}(\mathbf{y})D^{-1}, & \mathbf{x}\in \Omega^{-}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(4.11)
It is easy to check that
$$ L_{\kappa}\Delta[u-u_{1}](\mathbf{x})= 0, \quad \text{in }\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega. $$
(4.12)
If we denote
$$ \Delta[u](\mathbf{x})-\Delta[u_{1}](\mathbf{x})\triangleq\Theta( \mathbf {x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega, $$
(4.13)
and use boundary value condition
$$ \Delta[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Delta[u]^{-}( \mathbf{x})C+g_{3}(\mathbf{x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
we conclude
$$ \Theta^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Theta^{-}(\mathbf{x})C+ \tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf {x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
(4.14)
here \(\tilde{g}_{3}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}}(\partial \Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(0<\tilde{\alpha}\leq1\) is taken from (4.7). It follows that \(\Theta(\infty)=0\) from Theorem 3.13. Using (4.12), we get the representation formula
$$ \Theta(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}[\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+ \frac{\kappa(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| ^{2}}-\frac{\kappa}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{3}(\mathbf{y}), &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}[\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}+ \frac{\kappa(\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x})}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\| ^{2}}-\frac{\kappa}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}] e^{-\kappa\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{3}(\mathbf{y})C^{-1},& \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
Analogously, we find with \(u_{2}(\mathbf{x})\) from (4.4) that
$$ \Delta[u-u_{1}-u_{2}](\mathbf{x})=0, \quad \mathbf{x}\in \mathbb {R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega. $$
(4.15)
Denoting \(D[u]-D[u_{1}]-D[u_{2}]\triangleq\Xi\), where \(\mathbf{x}\in \mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega\) and using the boundary value condition
$$ D[u]^{+}(\mathbf{x})=D[u]^{-}(\mathbf{x})B+g_{2}( \mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
(4.16)
it follows that
$$ \Xi^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Xi^{-}(\mathbf{x})B+ \tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x}),\quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
(4.17)
where \(\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}}(\partial \Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(0<\tilde{\alpha}\leq1\) is taken from (4.8). Again applying Theorem 3.13, we have \(\liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{M(r,\Xi)}{r^{m-1}}<\infty\). In view of (4.17) and Lemma 2.2, we obtain
$$ \Xi(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{2}(\mathbf{y}) \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf{x})C^{1}_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}, & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{\mathbf {y}-\mathbf{x}}{\|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|^{3}}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde {g}_{2}(\mathbf{y})B^{-1} \\ \quad {} +\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf{x})C^{1}_{l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1}}B^{-1}, & \mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(4.18)
Finally, we use
$$ u_{3}(\mathbf{x})=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{1}{\| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf {y}) \\ \quad {}+\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}C_{1,p-1}\mathbf{x}V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf {x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}^{1}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{+}, \\ \frac{1}{4\pi}\int _{\partial\Omega}\frac{1}{\| \mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\|}\,d\sigma_{\mathbf{y}}\tilde{g}_{2}(\mathbf {y})B^{-1} \\ \quad {}+\sum_{p=1}^{m}\sum_{(l_{1},\ldots ,l_{p-1})}C_{1,p-1}\mathbf{x} V_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}(\mathbf{x})C_{l_{1},\ldots,l_{p-1}}^{1}B^{-1}, &\mathbf{x}\in\Omega^{-}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$
(4.19)
We arrive at
$$ D[u-u_{1}-u_{2}-u_{3}]=0, \quad \mathbf{x}\in \mathbb {R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega. $$
Defining
$$ u(\mathbf{x})-u_{1}(\mathbf{x})-u_{2}(\mathbf{x})-u_{3}( \mathbf {x})\triangleq\Upsilon(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in \mathbb{R}^{3}\setminus\partial\Omega. $$
(4.20)
According to the boundary value condition
$$ u^{+}(\mathbf{x})=u^{-}(\mathbf{x})A+g_{1}( \mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
we get
$$ \Upsilon^{+}(\mathbf{x})=\Upsilon^{-}(\mathbf{x})A+\tilde {g}_{1}(\mathbf{x}), \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega, $$
(4.21)
where \(\tilde{g}_{1}(\mathbf{x})\in H^{\tilde{\alpha}}(\partial \Omega, \operatorname{Cl}(V_{3,3}))\), \(0<\tilde{\alpha}\leq1\), is as in (4.7). It is clear that \(\liminf_{r\rightarrow\infty}\frac{M(r,\Upsilon )}{r^{m}}<\infty\). Using Lemma 2.2, we get
$$ \Upsilon(\mathbf{x})=u_{4}(\mathbf{x}). $$
On the other hand, we can directly prove that (4.2) is the solution of (4.1). The proof is completed. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Research was supported by NNSF of China (Nos. 11401287 and 11301248), the AMEP and DYSP of Linyi University.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, 276005, P.R. China

References

  1. Dávila, J, Dupaigne, L, Wang, KL, Wei, JC: A monotonicity formula and a Liouville-type theorem for a fourth order supercritical problem. Adv. Math. 258, 240-285 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Gürlebeck, K, Sprössig, W: Quaternionic Analysis and Elliptic Boundary Value Problems. Birkhäuser, Basel (1990) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Gürlebeck, K, Sprössig, W: Quaternionic and Clifford Calculus for Physicists and Engineers. Wiley, Chichester (1997) MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Gürlebeck, K, Zhang, Z: Some Riemann boundary value problems in Clifford analysis. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 33, 287-302 (2010) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Laurençot, P, Walker, C: A fourth-order model for MEMS with clamped boundary conditions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 109, 1435-1464 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Laurençot, P, Walker, C: Sign-preserving property for some fourth-order elliptic operators in one dimension or in radial symmetry. J. Anal. Math. 127, 69-89 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Smyrlis, Y-S: Applicability and applications of the method of fundamental solutions. Math. Comput. 78, 1399-1434 (2009) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Trèves, F: Linear Partial Differential Equations with Constant Coefficients: Existence, Approximation, and Regularity of Solutions. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 6. Gordon & Breach, New York (1966) MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Wei, JC, Ye, D: Liouville theorems for stable solutions of biharmonic problem. Math. Ann. 356, 1599-1612 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang, Z, Gürlebeck, K: Some Riemann boundary value problems in Clifford analysis. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 58, 991-1003 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Abreu Blaya, R, Bory Reyes, J, Peña-Peña, D: Jump problem and removable singularities for monogenic functions. J. Geom. Anal. 17, 1-13 (2007) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Abreu Blaya, R, Bory Reyes, J, Brackx, F, De Schepper, H, Sommen, F: Boundary value problems associated to a Hermitian Helmholtz equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 389, 1268-1279 (2012) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Abreu Blaya, R, Ávila, RÁ, Bory Reyes, J: Boundary value problems with higher order Lipschitz boundary data for polymonogenic functions in fractal domains. Appl. Math. Comput. 269, 802-808 (2015) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernstein, S: On the left linear Riemann problem in Clifford analysis. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 3, 557-576 (1996) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Bu, Y, Du, J: The RH boundary value problem for the k-monogenic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 347, 633-644 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong, Y, Du, J: A kind of Riemann and Hilbert boundary value problem for left monogenic functions in \(\mathbb{R}^{m}\) (\(m\geq2\)). Complex Var. Theory Appl. 49, 303-318 (2004) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Gong, Y, Qian, T, Du, J: Structure of solutions of polynomial Dirac equations in Clifford analysis. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 49, 15-24 (2004) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Gürlebeck, K, Zhang, Z: Generalized integral representations for functions with values in \(C(V_{3,3})\). Chin. Ann. Math., Ser. B 32, 123-138 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Gu, L, Du, J, Cai, D: A kind of Riemann boundary value problems for pseudo-harmonic functions in Clifford analysis. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 59, 412-426 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu, L, Zhang, Z: Riemann boundary value problem for harmonic functions in Clifford analysis. Math. Nachr. 287, 1001-1012 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, J: Boundary Value Problems of Analytic Functions. World Scientific, Singapore (1993) Google Scholar
  22. Muskhelishvilli, NI: Singular Integral Equations. Nauka, Moscow (1968) Google Scholar
  23. Kravchenko, VV, Shapiro, M: Integral Representations for Spatial Models of Mathematical Physics. Res. Notes Math., vol. 351. Pitman, London (1996) MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu, Z: Helmholtz equations and boundary value problems. In: Partial Differential Equations with Complex Analysis. Res. Notes Math., vol. 262, pp. 204-214. Pitman, Harlow (1992) Google Scholar
  25. Ryan, J: Gauchy-Green type formulae in Clifford analysis. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347, 1331-1341 (1995) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang, Z: On k-regular functions with values in a universal Clifford algebra. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 315, 491-505 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. De Almeida, R, Kraußhar, RS: On the asymptotic growth of entire monogenic functions. Z. Anal. Anwend. 24, 791-813 (2005) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Delanghe, R, Sommen, F, Souček, V: Clifford Algebras and Spinor-Valued Functions. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1992) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Delanghe, R: On the regular analytic functions with values in a Clifford algebra. Math. Ann. 185, 91-111 (1970) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gu 2016

Advertisement