 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a supercritical elliptic problem in unbounded cylinders
Boundary Value Problems volume 2017, Article number: 52 (2017)
Abstract
We consider the following elliptic problem:
in an unbounded cylindrical domain
where \(1\leq m< Np\), \(q=q(a,b):=\frac{Np}{Np(a+1b)}\), \(p>1\) and \(A,B\in\mathbb{R}_{+}\). Let \(p^{*}_{N,m}:=\frac {p(Nm)}{Nmp}\). We show that \(p^{*}_{N,m}\) is the true critical exponent for this problem. The starting point for a variational approach to this problem is the known Maz’ja’s inequality (Sobolev Spaces, 1980) which guarantees, for the q previously defined, that the energy functional associated with this problem is well defined. This inequality generalizes the inequalities of Sobolev \((p=2, a=0 \mbox{ and } b=0)\) and Hardy \((p=2, a=0 \mbox{ and } b=1)\). Under certain conditions on the parameters a and b, using the principle of symmetric criticality and variational methods, we prove that the problem has at least one solution in the case \(f\equiv0\) and at least two solutions in the case \(f \not\equiv0\), if \(p< q< p^{*}_{N,m}\).
1 Introduction
Consider the class of degenerate singular quasilinear elliptic equations in \(\mathbb {R}^{N}\)
where A is a nonnegative unbounded function that vanishes at some points of \(\mathbb {R}^{N}\). More specifically, we consider variants of this class of equations of the type
where \(x\in \mathbb {R}^{N}\), \(1< p \leq N1\), \(q=q(a,b):=\frac{Np}{Np(a+1b)}\), \(\alpha, \beta\) and λ are parameters, \(0< a<\frac{Np}{p}\), \(a\leq b\leq a+1\), \(d,r\in \mathbb {R}\), \(K\in L^{\frac{q}{qr}}_{r(db)} (\mathbb {R}^{N})\) and f is a function that belongs to the dual space of
Equations of this type arise in existence problems of stationary anisotropic solutions for the Schrödinger equation [2], in theory of nonNewtonian fluids [3], in problems of flow through porous media [4], in study of pseudoplastic fluids [5], in dynamic models for galaxies with cylindrical symmetry [6], and several other models. Variants of problem (2) in the radial setting were initially treated by Clément, de Figueiredo and Mitidieri [7] who proved, for example, the Brézis and Nirenberg [8] result for this radial operator. In recent years, several researchers have studied variants of problem (2) in the radial setting; see references [9–12].
Schindler [13] studied variants of this class of equations on unbounded cylinders. Under certain conditions on the function f, he showed that the problem
has a weak solution in \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\), where Ω is an unbounded cylindrical domain, \(\Omega\subset \mathbb {R}^{N}\), \(N\geq3\) and \(2\leq p< N\). The lack of compactness of the Sobolev embedding makes standard variational techniques more delicate. To solve this lack of compactness, the author introduces a modified concentrationcompactness principle for which a version of the mountain pass lemma [14] may be applied.
Afterwards, Hashimoto, Ishiwata and Ôtani [15] studied the following problem involving the pLaplacian operator:
in infinite tubeshaped domains \(\Omega :=\Omega_{d} \times \mathbb {R}^{Nd}\), where \(\Omega_{d}\) are ddimensional annulus domains with \(N\geq3\). Using the concentrationcompactness principle at infinity for partially symmetric functions and the variational method due to Ishiwata and Ôtani [16], they proved the existence of at least one positive solution u to problem (4) belonging to \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\cap L^{\infty}(\Omega)\), for \(2\leq d\leq N1\) and \(p< q< p_{d}^{\dagger}\), where
More recently, Clapp and Szulkin [17] studied the supercritical case for the following problem involving the Laplacian operator:
in an unbounded cylindrical domain
where \(1\leq m < N2\). The authors showed that if \(2< p<2_{N,m}^{*}:=\frac{2(Nm)}{(Nm)2}\), then problem (5) has infinite invariant solutions and one of these solutions is positive. Note that \(2_{N,m}^{*}\) is the critical Sobolev exponent in dimension \(Nm\), which is greater than the usual critical Sobolev exponent \(2^{*}=\frac{2N}{N2}\). This existence result has been proved using the index theory (see [18], Theorem II.5.7), and the argument used to prove the positivity of the solution was the maximum principle.
Motivated by the recent results in [17], in this work we study the effect of the topology of the domain on existence and multiplicity results in the supercritical case of the following problem:
in an unbounded cylindrical domain
where \(p>1\), \(1\leq m< Np\), \(q=q(a,b):=\frac{Np}{Np (a+1b)}\), \(a \frac{m}{Nm} < b < a+1\), \(a < \frac{ (m+1)p}{p}\) and \(A,B\in \mathbb {R}_{+}\).
In this present work, as the domain is unbounded, the lack of compactness of the Sobolev embedding \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(\Omega)\) (\(p\leq q < p^{*}:=\frac{pN}{Np} \)) makes standard variational techniques more delicate.
Generally speaking, some geometrical and topological properties of the domain can help us to show existence results for elliptic problems; for example, the symmetry of the domain can be used to improve the Sobolev embedding. However, since we consider unbounded domains, the lack of compactness of the Sobolev embedding does not follow immediately from the standard variational techniques. This is one of the main difficulties we have to deal with in this work.
First we consider problem (6) in the case where \(f\equiv0\), and we get the following existence result. Note that in its statement, \(p_{N,m}^{*}\) is the critical Sobolev exponent in dimension \(Nm\), which is greater than the usual critical Sobolev exponent \(p^{*}=\frac{pN}{Np}\).
Theorem 1
If \(1\leq m < Np\), \(f\equiv0\) and \(p< q< p^{*}_{N,m}\), then problem (6) has at least one invariant solution.
A natural question is to check what happens to the previous problem under the presence of certain perturbations. For this purpose, we shall consider the perturbed problem by a function f belonging to the dual space of \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\), denoted by \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\), and we get the following existence and multiplicity result.
Theorem 2
If \(1\leq m < Np\) and \(p< q< p^{*}_{N,m}\), then there is a constant \(\overline{\varepsilon} >0\) such that for any \(f\in W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\) with \(0< \Vert f \Vert _{1} < \overline{\varepsilon}\), problem (6) has at least two invariant solutions.
To prove these results, we study an auxiliary problem and show that its solutions are axially symmetric and belong to the space \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\subset W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\), where \(S:=(A,B)\times \mathbb {R}^{Nm1}\). As usual, this is done by defining an energy functional \(I \colon W_{0}^{1,p}(S) \to \mathbb {R}\) and by showing the existence of critical points for I in the space \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\). These critical points are the weak solutions of the auxiliary problem and, by our setting, they also solve problem (6).
Since S is an unbounded domain, the difficulty to prove Theorems 1 and 2 lies in the fact that \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) cannot be compactly embedded into \(L^{q}(S)\) for any \(q\in(p, p_{N,m}^{*})\). In order to solve the lack of compactness, we construct a subspace of invariant functions \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\subset W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) with compact embedding \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(S)\) for \(q\in (p,p_{N,m}^{*})\) (see [19, 20]).
Using the principle of symmetric criticality [21], we can look for critical points of I restricted on \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\). In this way we obtain a weak solution in \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\) for our problem using the mountain pass theorem of Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz [22]. Finally, to show the existence of a second solution, we use Ekeland’s variational principle [23].
Since \(q\in(p,p_{N,m}^{*})\) and \(p_{N,m}^{*}>p^{*}\), in problem (6) we consider not only the subcritical and critical cases but also the supercritical one.
Note that the pLaplacian operator \(\Delta_{p} u= \operatorname{div} ( \vert \nabla u \vert ^{p2} \nabla u )\) is a special case of the operator \(\operatorname{div} (\frac{ \vert \nabla u \vert ^{p2} \nabla u}{ \vert y \vert ^{ap}} )\); therefore, Theorems 1 and 2 improve the results of Hashimoto, Ishiwata and Ôtani [15].
This work is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce some notation and state some wellknown results, such as the principle of symmetric criticality and the mountain pass theorem. In Section 3 we introduce the auxiliary problem, whose solutions are also solutions to problem (6). To ensure the existence of solutions to the auxiliary problem, we use the results of the previous section as well as Ekeland’s variational principle.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we give some results which are used in the proofs of our main theorems. First, we denote by \(O(N)\) the group of linear isometries of \(\mathbb {R}^{N}\). Recall that if G is a closed subgroup of \(O(N)\), then an open subset Ω of \(\mathbb {R}^{N}\) is Ginvariant if \(g\Omega=\Omega\) for every \(g\in G\). Furthermore, a function \(u: \Omega\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is called Ginvariant if \(u(gx)=u(x)\) for all \(g\in G\), \(x \in\Omega\).
Definition 1
The action of a topological group G on a normed space X is continuous maps \(G\times X\longrightarrow X: [ g,u ]\rightarrow gu\) such that \(1\cdot u= u\), \((g_{1} g_{2}) u=g_{1}(g_{2} u)\) and \(u\mapsto gu\) is linear. The action is isometric if \(\Vert gu \Vert = \Vert u \Vert \). The space of invariant points is defined by
A function \(\varphi: X\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is invariant if \(\varphi\circ g = \varphi\) for every \(g\in G\).
Now we can state a result by Palais [21].
Lemma 1
Principle of symmetric criticality
Assume that the action of the topological group G on the Banach space X is isometric. If \(\varphi\in C^{1}(X,\mathbb {R})\) is invariant and if u is a critical point of φ on \(\operatorname{Fix}(G)\), then u is a critical point of φ.
A frequently used compactness criterion is the PalaisSmale condition (PS condition, in short).
Definition 2
PalaisSmale condition
If X is a Banach space and \(\Phi\in\mathcal{C}^{1}(X,\mathbb {R})\), then the functional Φ satisfies the PalaisSmale condition if any sequence \(\{u_{n} \}\subset X\) for which
possesses a convergent subsequence.
We finish this section with the statement of the wellknown result by Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz [22].
Lemma 2
AmbrosettiRabinowitz mountain pass theorem
If X is a Banach space, \(\Phi\in\mathcal{C}^{1}( X,\mathbb {R})\) satisfies the PS condition, \(\Phi(0)=0\) and

(i)
there are constants \(\rho,\alpha>0\) such that \(\Phi \vert_{\partial B_{\rho}}>\alpha\),

(ii)
there is \(e\in X\setminus\overline{B_{\rho}}\) such that \(\Phi(e)<0\),
then Φ possesses a critical value \(\overline{c}\geq\alpha\), with
where \(\Gamma= \{g\in \mathcal{C}( [0,1 ] ,X); g(0)=0 \textit{ and } g(1)=e \}\).
3 Proof of the main results
In our arguments, the proof of Theorem 2 contains the existence result which is stated as in Theorem 1. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, we will deal only with problem (6) in the case where f is not necessarily identical to zero.
An axially symmetric function \(u(y,z)=v( \vert y \vert ,z)\) solves problem (6) if, and only if, \(v:=v(r,z)\) (with \(r= \vert y \vert \)) solves
where \(S:=(A,B)\times \mathbb {R}^{Nm1}\) and \(\partial S:= \{ A,B \} \times \mathbb {R}^{Nm1}\).
We denote by \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) the subspace of axially symmetric functions of \(W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\) with the norm defined by \(\Vert v \Vert = ( \int_{S} \vert \nabla v \vert ^{p} \,dx )^{\frac{1}{p}}\). This norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) is equivalent to the standard norm on \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) (see [24], pp.158159).
If \(G:=O(Nm1)\) is the group of isometries of \(\mathbb {R}^{Nm1}\), then
and
are the subspaces of invariant functions.
Since \(A< r< B\), then the norms on \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\) and \(L^{q}(S)^{G}\) given by
are equivalent to the standard norms on \(W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) and \(L^{q}(S)\), respectively.
Denote \(X:=W_{0}^{1,p}(S)\) and \(E:=W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\). Let \(I\colon X\to \mathbb {R}\) be the energy functional associated to problem (7) and defined by
where
Applying the principle of symmetric criticality (Lemma 1), we can look for critical points of the functional I constrained to E, which are weak solutions to problem (7).
Using Maz’ja’s inequality for the parameters in problem (7), for \(Nm>p\geq1\), \(q:=\frac{Np}{Np (a+1b)}\), \(a \frac{m}{Nm} \leq b\leq a+1\) and \(a < \frac{(m+1)p}{p}\), we get the existence of a positive constant C such that
for every \(v\in X\). Therefore, the functional I is well defined for these parameters and the functions in the intervals and spaces previously mentioned.
In [19, 20], we have an important result of compactness which ensures that the embedding \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(S)\) is compact for \(1\leq m < Np\) and \(q\in(p,p_{N,m}^{*})\), where \(p_{N,m}^{*}:=\frac{p(Nm)}{Nmp}\). So, \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\) can be compactly embedded into \(L^{q}(S)^{G}\) for the norms defined in (8).
Note that when \(b=a+1\) and \(b= a \frac{m}{Nm}\), we have \(q=p\) and \(q=p_{N,m}^{*}\), respectively. Hence, we will consider \(a \frac{m}{Nm} < b < a+1\), so that the compactness result and Maz’ja’s inequality are both satisfied.
The following lemma shows that the functional I verifies the geometry conditions of the mountain pass theorem.
Lemma 3
Let \(I\vert_{E}\) be the energy functional associated to problem (7); then

(i)
there are \(\overline{\varepsilon},\rho, \alpha>0\) such that \(I \vert_{\partial B_{\rho}}\geq\alpha\), since \(0< \Vert f \Vert _{E^{1}}<\overline{\varepsilon}\);

(ii)
there is \(e\in E\setminus\overline{B_{\rho}}\) such that \(I(e)<0\).
Proof
(i) For any \(\varepsilon>0\), we deduce that
for all \(v\in E\), where \(\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p'}=1\). Therefore,
where \(S_{q}\) is the best constant in the embedding \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(S)^{G}\).
By fixing \(\varepsilon\in(0,1)\), we can find \(\rho>0\), with \(\Vert v \Vert _{m,a,p}=\rho\), \(\overline{\varepsilon}>0\) and \(\alpha >0\), such that the conclusion of the lemma holds true. For example, we can take
where \(M=\frac{1}{2} (\frac{1\varepsilon}{p} )>0\).
(ii) Let \(v\in E\) such that \(\Vert v \Vert _{a,m,p}=1\). Then, for any \(t>1\), we have
Since \(q>p>1\), then we have \(\lim_{t\to\infty} I(tv)= \infty\). So, there is \(e\in E\setminus\overline{B_{\rho}}\) such that \(I(e)<0\). □
Lemma 4
The functional I satisfies the PalaisSmale condition in E.
Proof
Let \(\{v_{n} \}\) be a PalaisSmale sequence for the functional I in E, i.e.,

1.
\(\vert I(v_{n}) \vert \leq M\) for some \(M>0\) and

2.
\(I'(v_{n})\to0\) in \(E^{1}\), where \(E^{1}\) is the dual space of E.
First we will show that \(\{v_{n} \}\) is bounded in E. Assume by contradiction that
Given \(\varepsilon>0\), by items 1 and 2 we deduce that
for \(n\in\mathbb{N}\) large enough.
Moreover, we also have
for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\).
Hence, for n large enough, we have
Letting \(n\to\infty\) in the previous inequality, we obtain a contradiction since \(1< p< q\). This implies that \(\{v_{n} \}\) is bounded in E.
Now we will prove that \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a Cauchy sequence in E. In [25] it is proved that the inequality
holds for all \(\xi, \eta\in \mathbb {R}^{N}\). Hence,
Since \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a PalaisSmale sequence, it follows that \(I_{1}=o ( \Vert v_{n} \Vert _{m,a,p} )\) and \(I_{2}=o ( \Vert v_{n} \Vert _{m,a,p} )\).
Using Hölder’s inequality, we have
It follows from the previous inequality and from the compact embedding \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(S)^{G}\) that \(I_{3}= o ( \Vert v_{n} \Vert _{a,m,p} )\). Therefore, \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a Cauchy sequence and the functional I satisfies the PalaisSmale condition. □
Lemma 5
The functional I is weakly lower semicontinuous in E, i.e., if \(\{v_{n} \}\) converges weakly to v in E, then \(I(v)\leq\liminf I(v_{n})\).
Proof
Let a sequence \(\{v_{n} \}\subset E\) be weakly convergent to v in E. Since the norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{m,a,p}\) is weakly lower semicontinuous in E, it follows that
We can conclude from the compact embedding \(W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\hookrightarrow L^{q}(S)^{G}\) that \(\{v_{n} \}\) converges strongly to v in \(L^{q}(S)^{G}\). Therefore,
By hypothesis, the sequence \(\{v_{n} \}\) converges weakly to v in E and \(f\in W_{0}^{1,p}(\Omega)\subset E^{1}\); hence,
Finally, combining (14), (15) and (16), we deduce that
therefore, the functional I is weakly lower semicontinuous in E. □
Proof of Theorem 2
By Lemmas 3 and 4, all the assumptions of the mountain pass theorem in [22] are satisfied. Hence, we deduce the existence of \(v_{1}^{*} \in W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\) which is a weak solution to problem (7) and \(I(v_{1}^{*})=\overline{c}>0\).
Now, we will prove that there is a second weak solution \(v_{2}^{*} \in W_{0,G}^{1,p}(S)\) such that \(v_{1}^{*}\neq v_{2}^{*}\). For \(\rho>0\) given as in Lemma 3, we define the number \(\underline{c}\) by
It is clear that \(\underline{c}\leq I(0)=0\). If \(\underline{c}=I(0)\), then 0 is a minimum value for I; hence,
which contradicts the fact that \(f\neq0\). Therefore, \(\underline{c}< I(0)=0\).
Denote by \(\overline{B}_{\rho}\) the closed ball of radius ρ centered at the origin in E, i.e.,
It follows that the set \(\overline{B}_{\rho}\) is a complete metric space with respect to distance defined by \(d(u,v):=\Vert uv \Vert _{m,a,p}\) for all \(u, v\in\overline{B}_{\rho}\).
By Lemma 5, the functional I is weakly lower semicontinuous and bounded from below by relation (9).
Let ε such that \(0<\varepsilon< \inf_{\partial B_{\rho}} I  \inf_{B_{\rho}} I\). Using Ekeland’s variational principle [23] for the functional \(I: \overline{B}_{\rho}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\), there is a function \(v_{\varepsilon}\in\overline{B}_{\rho}\) such that
Since
it follows that \(v_{\epsilon}\in B_{\rho}\).
We now define the functional \(K: \overline{B_{\rho}}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) by \(K(v)=I(v) + \varepsilon \Vert vv_{\varepsilon} \Vert _{m,a,p}\). It is immediate that \(v_{\varepsilon}\) is a minimum point of K, and so
for \(t>0\) small enough and \(\varphi\in B_{\rho}\). From inequality (17) we deduce that
It follows from (18) by letting \(t\to0^{+}\) that \(I'(v_{\varepsilon})\varphi+\varepsilon \Vert \varphi \Vert _{m,a,p} \geq 0\). Note that −φ also belongs to \(B_{\rho}\). So, replacing φ by −φ, we have
or simply \(I'(v_{\varepsilon})(\varphi)\leq\varepsilon \Vert \varphi \Vert _{m,a,p}\). In this way, we can deduce that \(\Vert I'(v_{\epsilon}) \Vert _{E^{1}} \leq\varepsilon\).
Therefore, from the previous information we can conclude that there is a sequence \(\{v_{k} \}\subset B_{\rho}\) such that
Using Lemma 4 we can show that up to a subsequence, \(\{v_{k} \}\) converges strongly to some \(v_{2}^{*}\in E\). Thus, \(v_{2}^{*}\) is a weak solution of (7) and \(v_{2}^{*}\) is a nontrivial solution since \(I(v_{2}^{*})=\underline{c}<0\). Finally, since \(I(v_{1}^{*})=\overline{c}>0>\underline{c}=I(v_{2}^{*})\), then \(v_{2}^{*}\neq v_{1}^{*}\). □
References
Maz’ja, GV: Sobolev Spaces. Springer, Berlin (1980)
Wang, ZQ, Willem, M: Singular minimization problems. J. Differ. Equ. 161, 307320 (2000)
Dautray, R, Lions, JL: Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology I: Physical Origins and Classical Methods. Springer, Berlin (1985)
Cîrstea, F, Motreanu, D, Rǎdulescu, V: Weak solutions of quasilinear problems with nonlinear boundary condition. Nonlinear Anal. 43, 623636 (2001)
di Benedetto, E: \(C^{1+\alpha}\) local regularity of weak solutions of degenerate elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 7, 827850 (1983)
Badiale, M, Tarantello, G: A SobolevHardy inequality with applications to a nonlinear elliptic equation arising in astrophysics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 163, 259293 (2002)
Clément, P, de Figueiredo, DG, Mitidieri, E: Quasilinear elliptic equations with critical exponents. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 7, 133170 (1996)
Brézis, H, Nirenberg, L: Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 36, 437477 (1983)
Abreu, EAM, Miyagaki, OH: A Robin problem for a class of quasilinear operators and a related minimizing problem. Nonlinear Anal. 59, 2134 (2004)
Assunção, RB, Carrião, PC, Miyagaki, OH: Multiplicity results for a degenerate quasilinear elliptic equation in halfspace. Differ. Integral Equ. 22, 753770 (2009)
de Figueiredo, DG, Gonçalves, JV, Miyagaki, OH: On a class of quasilinear elliptic problems involving critical exponents. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2, 4759 (2000)
Gonçalves, JV, Melo, AL: Multiple sign changing solutions in a class of quasilinear equations. Differ. Integral Equ. 15, 147165 (2002)
Schindler, I: Quasilinear elliptic boundaryvalue problems on unbounded cylinders and a related mountainpass lemma. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 120, 363374 (1992)
Schechter, M: A variation of the mountain pass lemma and applications. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 44, 491502 (1991)
Hashimoto, T, Ishiwata, M, Ôtani, M: Quasilinear elliptic equations in infinite tubeshaped domains. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 2, 483503 (2001)
Ishiwata, M, Ôtani, M: Concentration compactness principle at infinity with partial symmetry and its application. Nonlinear Anal. 51, 391407 (2002)
Clapp, M, Szulkin, A: A supercritical elliptic problem in a cylindrical shell. Prog. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 85, 233242 (2014)
Struwe, M: Variational Methods. Springer, Berlin (1990)
Fan, XL, Zhao, YZ: Linking and multiplicity results for the pLaplacian on unbounded cylinders. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 260, 479489 (2001)
Lions, LP: Symmétrie et compacité dans les espaces Sobolev. J. Funct. Anal. 49, 315334 (1982)
Palais, SR: The principle of symmetric criticality. Commun. Math. Phys. 69, 1930 (1979)
Rabinowtitz, PH: Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1986)
Ekeland, I: On the variational principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 47, 324353 (1974)
Adams, AR: Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Lao, YS: Nonlinear pLaplacian problems on unbounded domains. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 115, 10371045 (1992)
Acknowledgements
OHM was supported by INCTmat/MCT/Brazil, CNPq/Brazil Proc. 304015/20148 and Fapemig/Brazil CEX APQ00063/15. BMR was supported by Capes/DS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors declare that they contributed equally to the manuscript and that they read and approved the final draft of it.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Assunção, R.B., Miyagaki, O.H. & Rodrigues, B.M. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a supercritical elliptic problem in unbounded cylinders. Bound Value Probl 2017, 52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s136610170783z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s136610170783z