 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Existence and stability of periodic solutions for a forced pendulum with timedependent damping
Boundary Value Problems volume 2018, Article number: 105 (2018)
Abstract
In this paper, we study the existence, multiplicity and stability of periodic solutions for a forced pendulum with timedependent damping. The proof is based on the third order approximation method and a suitable version of the Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem.
1 Introduction
During the last few decades, the dynamics of the forced pendulum equation
has attracted much attention of many researchers, where κ, ω are constants and \(p\in {\mathbb {C}}({\mathbb {R}}/T{\mathbb {Z}})\). We refer the reader to [1, 2, 14, 18, 26–28, 32] for the existence and nonexistence of periodic solutions of (1.1), [5, 12, 29, 30] for the stability of periodic solutions of (1.1) and [17, 19, 23, 34, 35] for its chaotic behaviors.
If the damping coefficient depends on time and is a continuous Tperiodic function, then Eq. (1.1) becomes the following nonlinear damped equation:
in which we consider the case that \(h\in {\mathbb {C}}({\mathbb {R}}/T{\mathbb {Z}})\) has mean value equal to zero. Such an equation can be regard as a model on which not the inertial resistance but the viscous resistance acts predominantly. As far as we know, the study on the dynamics of Eq. (1.2) is few in the literature. Recently, Sugie in [37] studied the stability of the origin of Eq. (1.2) when the driving force \(p(t)\equiv0\). Based on Lyapunov’s stability theory and phase plane analysis of the positive orbits of an equivalent planar system to Eq. (1.2), a necessary and sufficient condition of the asymptotic stability for the origin of Eq. (1.2) was obtained.
However, up to now, the problem on the existence and stability of periodic solutions for Eq. (1.2) has not attracted attention in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap. In this paper, we study the existence, multiplicity and stability of periodic solutions for Eq. (1.2).
In the third section, we prove that Eq. (1.2) has a twist Tperiodic solution if the driving force is not too large. Such twist periodic solution is stable in the sense of Lyapunov [36]. The proof is based on the third order approximation method for nonlinear damped equations, which was developed by Chu et al. [6]. The third order approximation method for general timeperiodic Lagrangian equations was developed by Ortega [31] and Zhang [40] and has been applied in [8, 10, 11, 20–22, 24, 38, 39] for different kinds of equations. Recently, in [9], Chu, Liang, and Torres used the Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem and the third order approximation method to study the existence and stability of periodic oscillations of a rigid dumbbell satellite around its center of mass. We will apply them to study the existence, multiplicity and stability of periodic solutions for a forced pendulum with timedependent damping.
In the fourth section, we prove that Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct Tperiodic solutions. Moreover, at least one of them is unstable. Here, we say that Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct Tperiodic solutions, if such solutions are not differing by a multiple of 2π. Furthermore, we also study the existence of periodic and subharmonic solutions with winding number for Eq. (1.2). The proof is based on a suitable version of the Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem, which was originally conjectured by Poincaré [33] in 1912 when he studied the restricted three body problems, and was first proved by Birkhoff [3, 4] in 1913. During the last century, different proofs and developments were given. We refer the reader to [13, Sect. 1] for a short review of the Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 A stability criterion
Given a function \(a(t)\), we denote \(a_{+}(t)=\max\{a(t),0\}\) and \(a_{}(t)=\max\{a(t),0\}\) the positive and the negative parts of \(a(t)\).
Consider the nonlinear damped equation
where \(g:{\mathbb {R}}\times {\mathbb {R}}\mapsto {\mathbb {R}}\) is Tperiodic in t and of class \({\mathbb {C}}^{0,4}\) in \((t,u)\), \(h\in L^{1}({\mathbb {R}}/T{\mathbb {Z}})\) with zero mean value. Let ψ be a Tperiodic solution of Eq. (2.1), by translating it to the origin, we obtain the third order approximation
where
Based on the method of third order approximation for damped differential equations [6], the following stability criterion was proved in [9].
Theorem 2.1
([9, Theorem 2.2])
Assume there exist two constants \(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}\) such that \(0\leq\sigma_{1}\leq\sigma_{2}\leq\frac{\pi}{2\hat{T}} (\hat {T}=\tau(T))\) and
Suppose further that
where \(B(t)=b(t)\sigma(h)(t), C(t)=c(t)\sigma(h)(t)\). Then the trivial solution \(u=0\) of Eq. (2.2) is twist and therefore is stable.
2.2 The Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem
Set \(A={\mathbb {R}}\times[a,a]\) and \(B={\mathbb {R}}\times[b,b]\), where \(a>b>0\). We will work with a \({\mathbb {C}}^{k}\)diffeomorphism \(S:A\rightarrow B\) defined by
where \(Q,P:{\mathbb {R}}^{2}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) are functions of class \({\mathbb {C}}^{k}\) satisfying the periodicity conditions
We say that S is isotopic to the inclusion, if there exists a function \(H:A\times[0,1]\rightarrow B\) such that, for every \(\lambda\in[0,1]\), \(H_{\lambda}(x)=H(x,\lambda)\) is a homeomorphism with \(H_{0}(x)=S(x)\) and \(H_{1}(x)=x\). The class of the maps satisfying the above characteristics will be indicated by \(\mathbb{\varepsilon}^{k}(A)\).
We say that \(S\in\mathbb{\varepsilon}^{k}(A)\) is exact symplectic if there exists a smooth function \(V=V(\theta,r)\) with \(V(\theta+2\pi,r)=V(\theta,r)\) such that
The following theorem is a slight modified version of the Poincaré–Birkhoff fixed point theorem proved by Franks in [15, 16] and the statement on the instability was proved by Marò in [25].
Theorem 2.2
Let \(S:A\rightarrow B\) be an exact symplectic diffeomorphism belonging to \(\mathbb{\varepsilon}^{2}(A)\) such that \(S(A)\subset \operatorname{int}(B)\). Suppose that there exists \(\epsilon>0\) such that
Then S has at least two distinct fixed points \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) in A such that \(p_{1}p_{2}\neq(2k\pi,0)\) for every \(k\in {\mathbb {Z}}\). Moreover, at least one of the fixed points is unstable if S is analytic.
3 Stable periodic solutions
In this section, we prove that Eq. (1.2) has a twist Tperiodic solution u, which has the smallest \(L^{\infty}\) normal among all of Tperiodic solutions of Eq. (1.2). Throughout this section, we assume that
Consider the periodic problem of the linear damped equation
where \(\omega>0\) and \(h\in L^{1}({\mathbb {R}}/2\pi {\mathbb {Z}})\). It was proved in [7, Corollary 2.6] that if
then the Green function \(G(t, s)\) of the periodic problem (3.2) is positive for all \((t,s)\in[0,T]\times[0,T]\). In this case, the nonhomogeneous damped equation
has a unique Tperiodic solution, which can be written as
Lemma 3.1
([20], Lemma 2.1)
Let γ and η be positive parameters. Then the cubic equation
has a positive root if and only if \(27\gamma\eta^{2}<4\). In this case, the minimal positive root is given by
which satisfies
Theorem 3.2
Assume that (3.3) is satisfied and
Then Eq. (1.2) has a unique Tperiodic solution u such that \(\u\_{\infty}\) is the smallest among all of Tperiodic solutions of Eq. (1.2). Moreover, u satisfies
Proof
It is obvious that u is a Tperiodic solution of Eq. (1.2) if and only if it is a fixed point of the operator equation
Since (3.3) holds, the Green function \(G(t,s)>0\) for all \((t,s)\in[0,T]\times[0,T]\). Furthermore, it is easy to verify that the operator \(\mathbb{T}\) is a completely continuous operator from \({\mathbb {C}}({\mathbb {R}}/T{\mathbb {Z}})\) to itself.
For any \(u\in {\mathbb {C}}({\mathbb {R}}/T{\mathbb {Z}})\), it follows from the basic estimate \(u\sin u\leq\frac{u^{3}}{6}\) and the fact \(\int_{0}^{T}G(t,s)\,\mathrm{ d}s=\frac{1}{\omega}\) that
which yields
Now we define the closed ball
By Lemma 3.1 and (3.7), we know that \(\mathbb {T}(\mathbb{B})\subset\mathbb{B}\).
We next prove that the operator \(\mathbb{T}:\mathbb{B}\rightarrow \mathbb{B} \) is a strict contraction map. Let \(u,v\in\mathbb{B}\), then
Using the estimate (3.4), we have
By (3.5), (3.8) and (3.9), we have
for all \(u,v\in\mathbb{B}\). Thus, if the strict inequality in condition (3.5) is satisfied, then the operator \(\mathbb{T}:\mathbb {B}\rightarrow\mathbb{B} \) is a strict contraction map.
Finally, by using the Banach contraction mapping theorem, we know that the operator \(\mathbb{T}\) has a unique fixed point u in \(\mathbb {B}\) if the strict inequality in condition (3.5) is satisfied. Note that if the equality in (3.5) holds, we can also obtain the uniqueness from the proof above, although \(\mathbb{T}\) may not be a strict contraction map.
By the uniqueness of the Tperiodic solution of Eq. (1.2) in \(\mathbb{B}\), we know that \(\u\_{\infty}\) is smaller than other possible Tperiodic solutions of Eq. (1.2). Moreover, (3.6) holds. □
The main result of this section reads as follows.
Theorem 3.3
Assume that (3.1) and (3.3) are satisfied. Then there exists a constant \(\rho\in(0,\frac{2\sqrt{2}\omega }{3}]\), such that the Tperiodic solution u of Eq. (1.2) obtained in Theorem 3.2 is of twist type if \(\p\_{\infty}\leq\rho\).
Proof
Let us fix \(g(t,u)=\omega\sin u\). Then the coefficients of the expansion (2.3) gives
If (3.3) holds, then the linearized damped equation
is in the first elliptic region. By (3.10), we have the following estimates:
where \(H_{*}=\min_{t\in[0,T]}\int_{0}^{t}h(s)\,\mathrm{ d}s\) and \(H^{*}=\max_{t\in[0,T]}\int_{0}^{t}h(s)\,\mathrm{ d}s\). Thus (2.4) is satisfied if we take
By (3.10), we obtain \(C_{+}=0\) and
Therefore, we note that
and
Then we can see that (2.5) holds if the following inequality holds:
By straightforward computations, we obtain
Therefore, by continuity there exists a constant \(\rho\in(0,\frac {2\sqrt{2}\omega}{3}]\) such that (3.11) holds whenever \(\p\ _{\infty}\leq\rho\). Then the proof is finished by using Theorem 2.1. □
Example 3.4
Consider the following forced damped pendulum equation:
where α, ω and η are positive constants with \(\alpha<1\). Moreover, assume that
Then there exists a constant \(\rho\in(0,\frac{2\sqrt{2}\omega }{3}]\), such that Eq. (3.12) has a 2πperiodic solution which is twist and therefore stable in the sense of Lyapunov if \(\eta\leq\rho\).
Proof
Equation (3.12) can be regarded as a problem of the form Eq. (1.2), where
By calculating, if (3.13) holds, then we have
Now the result follows directly from Theorem 3.3. □
4 Multiplicity of periodic solutions
The aim of this section is to prove that the Poincaré map associated to Eq. (1.2) fits the hypotheses of Theorem 2.2 exposed in Sect. 2.1.
Multiplying both sides of Eq. (1.2) by \(\sigma(h)(t )\), we have
Note that Eq. (4.1) is equivalent to the planar system
Let \((u,v)^{\top}=(u(t,\theta,r),v(t,\theta,r))^{\top}\) be the solution of the system (4.2) satisfying the initial condition
It is easy to verify that there exist two positive constants \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\) such that
which guarantees that the solution \((u,v)^{\top}\) of the initial value problem (4.2)–(4.3) is unique and globally defined. Then we can define the Poincaré map associated to the system (4.2) as
Obviously, the fixed points of the Poincaré map S correspond to the Tperiodic solutions of the system (4.2). It follows from 2πperiodicity of the function sinu and the uniqueness of \((u(t,\theta,r),v(t,\theta,r))^{\top}\) that
Then we have
which implies that the Poincaré map S is defined on the cylinder. Based on the theorem of differentiability with respect to the initial conditions, it is easy to see that the Poincaré map \(S\in C^{2}(A)\). Since \((u(t,\theta,r),v(t,\theta,r))^{\top}\) is unique and globally defined, the Poincaré map S is a diffeomorphism of A. The isotopy to the identity is given by the flow
Note that \(\Psi_{0}(\theta,r)=S(\theta,r)\), \(\Psi_{1}(\theta ,r)=(\theta,r)\) and this isotopy is valid on the cylinder. Therefore, the Poincaré map \(S\in\mathbb{\varepsilon}^{2}(A)\).
Theorem 4.1
Assume that
Then Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct Tperiodic solutions, and at least one of them is unstable.
Proof
In order to apply Theorem 2.2, we need to prove that the Poincaré map S is exact symplectic and satisfies the boundary twist condition (2.7).
Let us first prove that the Poincaré map S is exact symplectic. Consider the \({\mathbb {C}}^{1}\) function
Let us compute the partial derivatives of \(V(\theta,r)\)
Then, by the second equation of the system (4.2), we have
Integrating by parts and using the first equation of the system (4.2), we have
Substituting the above equality into (4.6) gives
Analogously, we have
which means that the Poincaré map \(S(\theta,r)\) is exact symplectic.
We next prove that the Poincaré map S satisfies the boundary twist condition (2.7). Integrating the second equation of the system (4.2) from 0 to t with \(t\in[0,t]\), we obtain
where \(\overline{\xi}=\frac{1}{T}\int_{0}^{T}\xi(s)\,\mathrm{ d}s\). Thus we can find a positive constant \(\rho_{1}\geq T(\omega\overline {\sigma(h)}+\overline{\sigma(h)p})>0\) such that \(v(t)>0\) if \(r>\rho_{1}\), \(\forall t\in[0,T]\). By the first equation of (4.2), we know that
which means that u is increasing for \(t\in[0,T]\). So we can choose a positive constant ρ with \(\rho>\rho_{1}\), then we have
By a standard compactness argument, we can conclude that there exists \(\epsilon>0\) such that
Analogously, we have
In order to apply Theorem 2.2, we take \(A={\mathbb {R}}\times[\rho,\rho]\). By the solutions of the system (4.2) are globally defined, one can find a larger B such that \(S(A)\subset \operatorname{int}B\). Since the righthand side of the system (4.2) is analytic with respect to the variables \((u,v)\), the Poincaré map S is also analytic, as follows from the analytic dependence on the initial conditions.
Up to now, all the conditions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied, thus we see that the Poincaré map
has at least two fixed points, and at least one of them is unstable. That is, Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct Tperiodic solutions and at least one of them is unstable. □
Now we consider the existence of the socalled Tperiodic solutions with winding number of Eq. (1.2), i.e., solutions u such that
Such solutions are also called running solutions. Obviously, we get the usual Tperiodic solutions when \(N=0\).
Let u be a Tperiodic solution of Eq. (1.2) with winding number N. Taking the change of variables
Obviously, we have
which implies that Tperiodic solutions with winding number N of Eq. (1.2) correspond to Tperiodic solutions of the equation
Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we can prove the following result.
Theorem 4.2
Assume that (4.5) holds and
Then for every integer N, Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct Tperiodic solutions with winding number N, and at least one of them is unstable.
Let u is a periodic solution of (1.2) and take its minimal period \(\tau>0\). Since T is the minimal period of p, we have \(\tau =kT, k\in {\mathbb {N}}\mbox{ with } k\geq1\). Therefore, if \(k=1\), x is a harmonic (periodic) solution of Eq. (1.2); if \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\mbox{ with } k>1\), u is a subharmonic solution of Eq. (1.2).
Finally, we study the existence of korder subharmonic solutions with winding number N of Eq. (1.2), that is,
Theorem 4.3
Assume that (4.5) and (4.10) hold. Then, for each couple of relatively prime natural numbers N and k, Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct korder subharmonic solutions with winding number N and kT is the minimal period. Moreover, at least one of them is unstable.
Proof
By Theorem 4.2, with T replaced by kT, we see that Eq. (1.2) has at least two geometrically distinct korder subharmonic solutions with winding number N. Moreover, at least one of them is unstable. We only need to verify that kT is the minimal period of periodic solutions with winding number N for Eq. (1.2).
Conversely, suppose that mT is the minimal period, where \(m\in\{ 1,2,\ldots,k1\}\). So there exists an integer i with \(i\neq0\), such that
Notice that there exist positive integers \(l_{1}\) and \(l_{2}\) such that
By (4.12), we have
By (4.11), we have
According to the above two equalities and the uniqueness of the solution u, we have
which is impossible because N and k are relatively prime and i is a nonzero integer and \(m\in\{1,2,\ldots,k1\}\). □
Example 4.4
Consider the following damped pendulum equation:
where α and ω are positive constants with \(\alpha<1\). Then the following conclusions hold:

(I)
Equation (4.15) has at least two geometrically distinct 2πperiodic solutions, and at least one of them is unstable.

(II)
For every integer N, Eq. (4.15) has at least two geometrically distinct 2πperiodic solutions with winding number N, and at least one of them is unstable.

(III)
For each couple of relatively prime natural numbers N and k, Eq. (4.15) has at least two geometrically distinct korder subharmonic solutions with winding number N and kT is the minimal period. Moreover, at least one of them is unstable.
Proof
Equation (4.15) can be regarded as a problem of the form Eq. (1.2), where
By calculating, we have
Now the results (I)–(III) follow directly from Theorems 4.1–4.3. □
References
Alonso, J.M.: Nonexistence of periodic solutions for a damped pendulum equation. Differ. Integral Equ. 10, 1141–1148 (1997)
Amster, P., Mariani, M.C.: Some results on the forced pendulum equation. Nonlinear Anal. 68, 1874–1880 (2008)
Birkhoff, G.D.: Proof of Poincaré’s geometric theorem. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 14, 14–22 (1913)
Birkhoff, G.D.: An extension of Poincaré’s last geometric theorem. Acta Math. 47, 297–311 (1926)
C̆epic̆ka, J., Drábek, P., Jens̆íková, J.: On the stability of periodic solutions of the damped pendulum equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 209, 712–723 (1997)
Chu, J., Ding, J., Jiang, Y.: Lyapunov stability of elliptic periodic solutions of nonlinear damped equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 396, 294–301 (2012)
Chu, J., Fan, N., Torres, P.J.: Periodic solutions for second order singular damped differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388, 665–675 (2012)
Chu, J., Lei, J., Zhang, M.: The stability of the equilibrium of a nonlinear planar system and application to the relativistic oscillator. J. Differ. Equ. 247, 530–542 (2009)
Chu, J., Liang, Z., Torres, P.J., Zhou, Z.: Existence and stability of periodic oscillations of a rigid dumbbell satellite around its center of mass. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B 22, 2669–2685 (2017)
Chu, J., Torres, P.J., Wang, F.: Radial stability of periodic solutions of the Gylden–Meshcherskii–type problem. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35, 1921–1932 (2015)
Chu, J., Torres, P.J., Wang, F.: Twist periodic solutions for differential equations with a combined attractiverepulsive singularity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 437, 1070–1083 (2016)
Chu, J., Wang, F.: Prevalence of stable periodic solutions for Duffing equations. J. Differ. Equ. 260, 7800–7820 (2016)
Fonda, A., Sabatini, M., Zanolin, F.: Periodic solutions of perturbed Hamiltonian systems in the plane by the use of the Poincaré–Birkhoff theorem. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 40, 29–52 (2012)
Fournier, G., Mawhin, J.: On periodic solutions of forced pendulumlike equations. J. Differ. Equ. 60, 381–395 (1985)
Franks, J.: Generalization of Poincaré–Birkhoff theorem. Ann. Math. 128, 139–151 (1988)
Franks, J.: Erratum to: “Generalizations of the Poincaré–Birkhoff theorem”. Ann. Math. 164, 1097–1098 (2006)
Hubbard, J.H.: The forced damped pendulum: chaos, complication and control. Am. Math. Mon. 106, 741–758 (1999)
Katriel, G.: Periodic solutions of the forced pendulum: exchange of stability and bifurcations. J. Differ. Equ. 182, 1–50 (2002)
Khomeriki, G.: Parametric resonance induced chaos in magnetic damped driven pendulum. Phys. Lett. A 380, 2382–2385 (2016)
Lei, J., Li, X., Yan, P., Zhang, M.: Twist character of the least amplitude periodic solution of the forced pendulum. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35, 844–867 (2003)
Lei, J., Torres, P.J.: \(L^{1}\) criteria for stability of periodic solutions of a Newtonian equation. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 140, 359–368 (2006)
Lei, J., Torres, P.J., Zhang, M.: Twist character of the fourth order resonant periodic solution. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 17, 21–50 (2005)
Lévai, B.L., Bánhelyi, B.: An optimization technique for verified location of trajectories with prescribed geometrical behaviour in the chaotic forced damped pendulum. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 21, 757–767 (2013)
Liang, Z.: Radially stable periodic solutions for radially symmetric Keplerianlike systems. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 23, 363–373 (2017)
Marò, S.: Periodic solutions of a forced relativistic pendulum via twist dynamics. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 42, 51–75 (2013)
Mawhin, J.: Seventyfive years of global analysis around the forced pendulum equation. Proc. Equadiff 9, 115–145 (1997)
Mawhin, J.: Global results for the forced pendulum equation. In: Handbook of Differential Equations, pp. 533–589. Elsevier/NorthHolland, Amsterdam (2004)
Ortega, R.: A counterexample for the damped pendulum equation. Bull. Cl. Sci., Acad. R. Belg. 73, 405–409 (1987)
Ortega, R.: Stability and index of periodic solutions of an equation of Duffing type. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., B 3, 533–546 (1989)
Ortega, R.: Topological degree and stability of periodic solutions for certain differential equations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 42, 505–516 (1990)
Ortega, R.: Periodic solution of a Newtonian equation: stability by the third approximation. J. Differ. Equ. 128, 491–518 (1996)
Ortega, R., Serra, E., Tarallo, M.: Noncontinuation of the periodic oscillations of a forced pendulum in the presence of friction. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 128, 2659–2665 (2000)
Poincaré, H.: Sur un théorème de géométrie. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 33, 375–407 (1912)
Sakthivel, G., Rajasekar, S.: Diffusion dynamics near critical bifurcations in a nonlinearly damped pendulum system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 1301–1311 (2012)
Sharma, A., Patidar, V., Purohit, G.: Bifurcation and chaos in periodically forced and nonlinearly damped pendulum. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14, 179–188 (2013)
Siegel, C., Moser, J.: Lectures on Celestial Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1971)
Sugie, J.: Smithtype criterion for the asymptotic stability of a pendulum with timedependent damping. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 141, 2419–2427 (2013)
Torres, P.J.: Existence and stability of periodic solutions for second order semilinear differential equations with a singular nonlinearity. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 137, 195–201 (2007)
Torres, P.J., Zhang, M.: Twist periodic solutions of repulsive singular equations. Nonlinear Anal. 56, 591–599 (2004)
Zhang, M.: The best bound on the rotations in the stability of periodic solutions of a Newtonian equation. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 67, 137–148 (2003)
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the referee for constructive suggestions for improving the initial version of the paper.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Funding
Fangfang Liao was supported by QingLan project of Jiangsu Province and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11701375).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Abbreviations
Not applicable.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, FF., Liang, Z. Existence and stability of periodic solutions for a forced pendulum with timedependent damping. Bound Value Probl 2018, 105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366101810285
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366101810285