- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Certain new dynamic nonlinear inequalities in two independent variables and applications
Boundary Value Problems volume 2020, Article number: 31 (2020)
Abstract
Several inequalities were proved in 2018 by Boudeliou, in 2015 by Abdeldain and El-Deeb and in 1998 by Pachpatte. It is our aim in this paper to generalize these inequalities to time scales. Beside that, we also apply our inequalities to discrete and continuous calculus to obtain some new inequalities as special cases. Furthermore, we study the boundedness of some problems by applying our results.
1 Introduction
In 2018, Boudeliou [9] discussed the following inequalities.
Theorem 1.1
Suppose\(a\in C(\hat{\varOmega } ,\mathbb{R}_{+})\)is nondecreasing with respect to\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \hat{\varOmega }=I_{1}\times I_{2} \), let\(\hat{\alpha }(\breve{x})\in C^{1}(I_{1},I_{2})\)and\(\hat{\beta }(\breve{y})\in C^{1}(I_{2},I_{2})\)be nondecreasing functions with\(\hat{\alpha }(\breve{x})\leq \breve{x}\)on\(I_{1}\), \(\hat{\beta }(\breve{y})\leq \breve{y}\), andg, u, p, \(f\in C(\hat{\varOmega } ,\mathbb{R}_{+})\). Furthermore, supposeψ̄, \(\bar{\varphi } \in C(\mathbb{R}_{+},\mathbb{R}_{+})\)are nondecreasing functions with\(\{ \bar{\psi } ,\bar{\varphi } \} (u)>0\)for\(u>0\), and\(\lim_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \bar{\psi } (u)=+\infty \). If\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \hat{\varOmega }\), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \hat{\varOmega } \)is chosen so that
Theorem 1.2
Assume thatg, a, f, u, β̂, α̂, ,ψ̄andφ̄be as in Theorem1.1. If\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \hat{\varOmega } \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x} \leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \hat{\varOmega } \)is chosen so that
In 1988, Hilger [33] presented time scale theory to unify continuous and discrete analysis. For some Gronwall–Bellman-type integral, dynamic inequalities and other type inequalities on time scales, see Refs. [1–8, 13, 14, 16–32, 34–41]. For more details on time scales calculus see [15].
A time scale \(\mathbb{T}\) is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of \(\mathbb{R}\). We suppose throughout the article that \(\mathbb{T}\) has the topology that it inherits from the standard topology on \(\mathbb{R}\). The forward jump operator \(\sigma : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{T}\) is defined for any \(t\in \mathbb{T}\) by
and the backward jump operator \(\rho : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{T}\) is defined for any \(t\in \mathbb{T}\) by
In the previous two definitions, we set \(\inf \emptyset =\sup \mathbb{T}\) (i.e., if t is the maximum of \(\mathbb{T}\), then \(\sigma (t)=t\)) and \(\sup \emptyset =\inf \mathbb{T}\) (i.e., if t is the minimum of \(\mathbb{T}\), then \(\rho (t)=t\)), where ∅ is the empty set.
A point \(t\in \mathbb{T}\) with \(\inf \mathbb{T}< t<\sup \mathbb{T}\) is said to be right-scattered if \(\sigma (t)>t\), right-dense if \(\sigma (t)=t\), left-scattered if \(\rho (t)< t\), and left-dense if \(\rho (t)=t\). Points that are simultaneously right-dense and left-dense are called dense points. Points that are simultaneously right-scattered and left-scattered are called isolated points.
We define the forward graininess function \(\mu :\mathbb{T}\to [0, \infty )\) for any \(t \in \mathbb{T}\) by \(\mu (t):= \sigma (t)-t\).
Let \(f : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) be a function. Then the function \(f^{\sigma } : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) is defined by \(f^{\sigma }(t)=f( \sigma (t))\), \(\forall t\in \mathbb{T}\), that is, \(f^{\sigma }=f \circ \sigma \). In a similar manner, the function \(f^{\rho } : \mathbb{T} \to \mathbb{R}\) is defined by \(f^{\rho }(t)=f(\rho (t))\), \(\forall t \in \mathbb{T}\), that is, \(f^{\rho }=f\circ \rho \).
We introduce the set \(\mathbb{T}^{\kappa }\) as follows: If \(\mathbb{T}\) has a left-scattered maximum m, then \(\mathbb{T}^{ \kappa }=\mathbb{T}-\{m\}\), otherwise \(\mathbb{T}^{\kappa } = \mathbb{T}\).
The interval \([a,b]\) in \(\mathbb{T}\) is defined by
Open intervals and half-closed interval are defined similarly.
Suppose \(f : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) is a function and \(t\in \mathbb{T}^{\kappa }\). Then we say that \(f^{\Delta }(t)\in \mathbb{R}\) is the delta derivative of f at t if for any \(\varepsilon > 0\) there exists a neighborhood U of t such that, for all \(s\in U\), we have
Furthermore, f is said to be delta differentiable on \(\mathbb{T} ^{\kappa }\) if it is delta differentiable at each \(t\in \mathbb{T} ^{\kappa }\).
If f, \(g:\mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) are delta differentiable functions at \(t\in \mathbb{T}^{\kappa }\), then
- 1.
\((f+g)^{\Delta }(t)=f^{\Delta }(t)+g^{\Delta }(t)\);
- 2.
\((fg)^{\Delta }(t)=f^{\Delta }(t)g(t)+f(\sigma (t))g^{\Delta }(t)=f(t)g ^{\Delta }(t)+f^{\Delta }(t)g(\sigma (t))\);
- 3.
\(( \frac{f}{g} )^{\Delta }(t)=\frac{f^{\Delta }(t)g(t)-f(t)g^{ \Delta }(t)}{g(t)g(\sigma (t))}\) provided \(g(t)g(\sigma (t))\neq 0\).
A function \(g : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) is called right-dense continuous (rd-continuous) if g is continuous at the right-dense points in \(\mathbb{T}\) and its left-sided limits exist at all left-dense points in \(\mathbb{T}\).
A function \(F : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) is said to be a delta antiderivative of \(f : \mathbb{T}\to \mathbb{R}\) if \(F^{\Delta }(t)=f(t)\) for all \(t\in \mathbb{T}^{\kappa }\). In this case, the definite delta integral of f is defined by
If \(g \in C_{\mathrm{rd}}(\mathbb{T})\) and t, \(t_{0}\in \mathbb{T}\), then the definite integral \(G(t) :=\int _{t_{0}}^{t} g(s)\Delta s\) exists, and \(G^{\Delta } (t) = g(t)\) holds.
Assume that a, b, \(c\in \mathbb{T}\), \(\alpha \in \mathbb{R}\), and f, g be continuous functions on \([a,b]_{\mathbb{T}}\). Then
- 1.
\(\int _{a}^{b} [f(t)+g(t) ]\Delta \eta =\int _{a}^{b}f(\eta ) \Delta \eta +\int _{a}^{b}g(\eta )\Delta \eta \);
- 2.
\(\int _{a}^{b}\alpha f(\eta )\Delta \eta =\alpha \int _{a}^{b}f(\eta ) \Delta \eta \);
- 3.
\(\int _{a}^{b}f(\eta )\Delta \eta =\int _{a}^{c}f(\eta )\Delta \eta + \int _{c}^{b}f(\eta )\Delta \eta \);
- 4.
\(\int _{a}^{b}f(\eta )\Delta \eta =-\int _{b}^{a}f(\eta )\Delta \eta \);
- 5.
\(\int _{a}^{a}f(\eta )\Delta \eta =0\);
- 6.
if \(f(t)\geq g(t)\) on \([a,b]_{\mathbb{T}}\), then \(\int _{a}^{b}f( \eta )\Delta \eta \geq \int _{a}^{b}g(\eta )\Delta \eta \).
We will need the following important relations between calculus on time scales \(\mathbb{T}\) and either continuous calculus on \(\mathbb{R}\) or discrete calculus on \(\mathbb{Z}\). Note that:
- 1.
If \(\mathbb{T}=\mathbb{R}\), then
$$ \sigma (t)=t,\qquad \mu (t)=0,\qquad f^{\Delta }(t)=f^{\prime }(t), \qquad \int _{a}^{b}f(\eta )\Delta \eta = \int _{a}^{b}f(t)\,{d}t. $$ - 2.
If \(\mathbb{T}=\mathbb{Z}\), then
$$ \sigma (t)=t+1,\qquad \mu (t)=1,\qquad f^{\Delta }(t)=f(t+1)-f(t), \qquad \int _{a}^{b}f(\eta )\Delta \eta =\sum _{t=a}^{b-1}f(t). $$
In the following, we present the basic theorems that will be needed in the proofs of our main results.
Theorem 1.3
Iff̂is Δ̂-integrable on\([a,b]\), then so is\(\vert \hat{f} \vert \), and
Theorem 1.4
(Chain rule on time scales [15])
Assume\(\hat{g}:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)is continuous, \(\hat{g}:\breve{\mathbb{T}}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)is Δ̂-differentiable on\(\mathbb{T^{\kappa }}\), and\(\hat{f}:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)is continuously differentiable. Then there exists\(c\in [\check{t},\sigma (\check{t})]\)with
Theorem 1.5
(Chain rule on time scales [15])
Let\(\hat{f}: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)be continuously differentiable and suppose\(\hat{g}: \breve{\mathbb{T}}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)is Δ̂-differentiable. Then\(f\circ \hat{g} : \breve{\mathbb{T}}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\)is Δ̂-differentiable and the formula
holds.
This paper gives us the time scale versions of the results provided in [9]. These inequalities, proved here, extend some known results in the literature, and they are also unify the continuous and the discrete case.
2 Main results
In what follows, \(\mathbb{R} \) denotes the set of real numbers, \(\mathbb{R} _{+}= [ 0,+\infty )\), \(\breve{\mathbb{T}}_{1}\), \(\breve{\mathbb{T}}_{2}\) are two time scales and we put \(\varOmega = \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{1}\times \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{2}=\{(\breve{t}, \breve{s}):\breve{t}\in \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{1}, \breve{s}\in \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{2}\}\) which is a complete metric space with the metric ρ̆ defined by
\(C_{\mathrm{rd}}(\varOmega ,\mathbb{R} _{+})\) denotes the set of all right-dense continuous functions from Ω into \(\mathbb{R} _{+}\) and \(C^{1}_{\mathrm{rd}} ( \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{i},\breve{\mathbb{T}}_{i} ) \) denotes the set of all right-dense continuously delta-differentiable functions from \(\breve{\mathbb{T}}_{i}\) into \(\breve{\mathbb{T}}_{i}\), \(i=1,2\). The two-variables time scales calculus and multiple integration on time scales were introduced in [10, 11] (see also [12]).
Theorem 2.1
Suppose that\(a\in C_{\mathrm{rd}}(\varOmega ,\mathbb{R}_{+})\)is nondecreasing with respect to\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), andg, u, p, \(f\in C_{\mathrm{rd}}(\varOmega ,\mathbb{R}_{+})\). Furthermore, suppose thatψ̄, \(\bar{\varphi } \in C(\mathbb{R}_{+},\mathbb{R}_{+})\)are nondecreasing functions with\(\{ \bar{\psi } ,\bar{\varphi } \} (u)>0\)for\(u>0\), and\(\lim_{u\rightarrow +\infty }\bar{\psi } (u)=+\infty \). If\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Proof
Assume that \(a ( \breve{x},\breve{y} ) >0\). Since \(q\geq 0\) and it is nondecreasing, fixing an arbitrary point \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \) and defining \(z(\breve{x}, \breve{y}) \) by
which is a positive and nondecreasing function for \(0\leq \breve{x} \leq \breve{\xi }\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{\zeta }\leq \breve{y}_{1}\), we have \(z(0,\breve{y}) =z( \breve{x},0) =q(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \) and
Differentiating \(z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \), with respect to x̆ and using (2.4), we get
since \(\bar{\varphi } \circ \bar{\psi } ^{-1}\) is nondecreasing with respect to \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \mathbb{R} _{+}\times \mathbb{R} _{+}\), we have
and from (2.5) we get
From (2.6) we get
Since \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \) is chosen arbitrarily,
So from (2.7) and (2.4) we get the desired inequality in (2.1). For \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) =0\), we carry out the above procedure with \(\epsilon >0\) instead of \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \) and subsequently let \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\). This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.2
If we take\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}=\mathbb{R}\)in Theorem2.1, then the inequality
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Corollary 2.3
The discrete form can be obtained by letting\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}= \mathbb{Z}\)in Theorem2.1:
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), which implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Theorem 2.4
Assume thath, \(b\in C_{\mathrm{rd}}(\varOmega ,\mathbb{R} _{+})\). Letg, f, p, a, u, ψ̄andφ̄be as in Theorem2.1, if\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y})\)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereq, Ğare defined by (2.2) and (2.3), respectively, and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Proof
Assume that \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) >0\). Fixing an arbitrary \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \), we define positive and nondecreasing function \(z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \) by
for \(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{\xi }\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{\zeta }\leq y_{1}\), then \(z(0,\breve{y}) =z( \breve{x},0) =q(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \) and
then we have
then
Integrating (2.12) and using (2.3) and (2.11), we get
Since \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \) is chosen arbitrarily,
From (2.13) and \(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \leq \bar{\psi } ^{-1} ( z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) ) \), we get the required inequality in (2.10). For \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) =0\), we carry out the above procedure with \(\epsilon >0\) instead of \(a(\breve{x}, \breve{y}) \) and subsequently let \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\). This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.5
If we take\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}=\mathbb{R}\)in Theorem2.4, then the inequality
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereĞis defined by (2.8) and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Corollary 2.6
The discrete form can be obtained by letting\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}= \mathbb{Z}\)in Theorem2.4:
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereĞis defined by (2.9) and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Theorem 2.7
Assume thatg, a, u, f, p, ψ̄andφ̄are as in Theorem2.1. If\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereĞis defined in (2.3) and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Proof
Suppose that \(a(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) >0\). Fixing an arbitrary \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \), we define a positive and nondecreasing function \(z(\breve{x},\breve{y})\) by
for \(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{\xi }\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{\zeta }\leq \breve{y}_{1}\), then \(z(0,\breve{y}) =z(\breve{x},0) =a(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta })\) and
then we have
or
Integrating (2.17) and using (2.3), we get
\((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \) is chosen arbitrarily, then from (2.15) we have
Since \(q_{1} (\breve{x},\breve{y} )>0 \) is a nondecreasing function, fixing an arbitrary point \(( \breve{\xi }, \breve{\zeta } ) \in \varOmega \) and defining \(v(\breve{x}, \breve{y}) >0\) to be a nondecreasing function by
for \(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{\xi }\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{\zeta }\leq y_{1}\), we have \(v(0,\breve{y}) =v( \breve{x},0) =q_{1}(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta })\) and
then we have
or
Integrating (2.19) and using (2.16), we get
Since we can choose \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta }) \in \varOmega \) arbitrarily, we have
From (2.20), (2.18) and \(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \leq \bar{ \psi } ^{-1} ( z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) ) \) we get the desired inequality in (2.14). For \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) =0\), we carry out the above procedure with \(\epsilon >0\) instead of \(a(\breve{x}, \breve{y}) \) and subsequently let \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\). This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.8
If we take\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}=\mathbb{R}\)in Theorem2.7, then the inequality
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereĞis as defined in (2.8) and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Corollary 2.9
The discrete form of Theorem2.7can be obtained by letting\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}=\mathbb{Z}\):
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereĞis as defined in (2.9) and
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Theorem 2.10
Assume thatg, a, f, u, ,ψ̄andφ̄be as in Theorem2.1. If\(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \)satisfies
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x} \leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Proof
Assume that \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) >0\). Taking \((\breve{\xi }, \breve{\zeta })\in \varOmega \) as a fixed arbitrary point, we define \(z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) >0\) to be a nondecreasing function by
for \(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{\xi }\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{\zeta }\leq \breve{y}_{1}\), hence \(z(0, \breve{y}) =z(\breve{x},0) =a(\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta })\) and
From (2.24), and applying the chain rule on time scales, Theorem 1.4, we get
thus, we have
Integrating (2.25) and using (2.23), we get
Since \((\breve{\xi },\breve{\zeta })\in \varOmega \) is chosen arbitrarily,
From (2.26) and \(u(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \leq \bar{\psi } ^{-1} ( z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) ) \), we get the desired inequality (2.21). For \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) =0\), we carry out the above procedure with \(\epsilon >0\) instead of \(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \) and subsequently let \(\epsilon \rightarrow 0\). This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.11
If we take\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}=\mathbb{R}\)in Theorem2.10, then the inequality
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x} \leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
Corollary 2.12
The discrete form can be obtained by letting\(\breve{\mathbb{T}}= \mathbb{Z}\)in Theorem2.10:
for\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), implies
for\(0\leq \breve{x} \leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), where
and\(( \breve{x}_{1},\breve{y}_{1} ) \in \varOmega \)is chosen so that
3 Applications
The present section illustrates how Theorems 2.7 and 2.1 can be used to study the boundedness of the solutions of some initial boundary value problem for partial dynamic equations in two independent variables.
Let us consider the problem
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), where \(\breve{k}\in C _{\mathrm{rd}} ( \varOmega \times \mathbb{R} ,\mathbb{R} )\), \(\breve{F} \in C_{\mathrm{rd}} ( \varOmega \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} , \mathbb{R} ) \), \(a_{1}\in C_{\mathrm{rd}} ( \breve{\mathbb{T}}_{1}, \mathbb{R} ) \) and \(a_{2}\in C_{\mathrm{rd}} ( \breve{\mathbb{T}} _{2},\mathbb{R} ) \).
Theorem 3.1
Suppose that the functionsk̆, F̆, \(a_{2}\), \(a_{1}\)in (3.1) and (3.2) satisfy the conditions
where the functionsp, g, a, f, andφ̄are defined as in Theorem2.7with\(a(\breve{x},\breve{y}) >0\), for all\((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\), whereF, \(q_{2}\)andGare defined as in Theorem2.7.
Proof
If the problem (3.1) and (3.2) has a solution \(u( \breve{x},\breve{y}) \), it can be written as
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \). Using the conditions (3.3), (3.4) and (3.5) in (3.7), we get
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \). Now, an application of Theorem 2.7 to (3.8) yields the required inequality in (3.6) where \(\bar{\psi }(u)=u\). □
Let us consider the initial boundary value problem of the form
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \).
Theorem 3.2
Assume that the functionsh, A, \(a_{2}\), \(a_{1}\)in (3.9) and (3.10) satisfy the conditions
where\(r\geq q>0\), then
for\(0\leq \breve{x}\leq \breve{x}_{1}\), \(0\leq \breve{y}\leq \breve{y} _{1}\).
Proof
If the problem (3.9) and (3.10), has a solution \(z(\breve{x},\breve{y}) \) it can be written as
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \). Using the conditions (3.11), (3.12) and (3.13) in (3.15), we get
from (3.16), we get
for any \((\breve{x},\breve{y}) \in \varOmega \). A suitable application of Theorem 2.1 to (3.17) with \(\bar{\psi } (u)=u^{q}\), \(\bar{ \varphi } ( u ) =u^{r}\) and \(p(\breve{x},\breve{y}) =0\) gives the required inequality in (3.14). □
References
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: Some new retarded nonlinear integral inequalities with iterated integrals and their applications in retarded differential equations and integral equations. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 5(Suppl. 3S), Paper no. 9 (2014)
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: On generalized of certain retarded nonlinear integral inequalities and its applications in retarded integro-differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 256, 375–380 (2015)
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: On some generalizations of certain retarded nonlinear integral inequalities with iterated integrals and an application in retarded differential equation. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 23(3), 470–475 (2015)
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: On some new nonlinear retarded integral inequalities with iterated integrals and their applications in integro-differential equations. Br. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 5(4), 479–491 (2015)
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A., Agarwal, P., El-Sennary, H.A.: On some dynamic inequalities of Steffensen type on time scales. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41(12), 4737–4753 (2018)
Agarwal, R., O’Regan, D., Saker, S.: Dynamic Inequalities on Time Scales. Springer, Cham (2014)
Agarwal, R.P., Lakshmikantham, V.: Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations. Series in Real Analysis, vol. 6. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (1993)
Akin-Bohner, E., Bohner, M., Akin, F.: Pachpatte inequalities on time scales. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 6(1), Article ID 6 (2005)
Ammar, B.: On certain new nonlinear retarded integral inequalities in two independent variables and applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2019(335), 103–111 (2018)
Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S.: Partial differentiation on time scales. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 13(3–4), 351–379 (2004)
Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S.: Multiple integration on time scales. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 13(3–4), 579–606 (2005)
Bohner, M., Guseinov, G.S.: Double integral calculus of variations on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl. 54, 45–57 (2007)
Bohner, M., Matthews, T.: The Grüss inequality on time scales. Commun. Math. Anal. 3(1), 1–8 (2007)
Bohner, M., Matthews, T.: Ostrowski inequalities on time scales. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 9(1), Article ID 6 (2008)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications. Birkhauser, Boston (2001)
Dinu, C.: Hermite–Hadamard inequality on time scales. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, Article ID 287947 (2008)
El-Deeb, A.A.: On Integral Inequalities and Their Applications. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken (2017)
El-Deeb, A.A.: Some Gronwall–Bellman type inequalities on time scales for Volterra–Fredholm dynamic integral equations. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 26(1), 1–17 (2018)
El-Deeb, A.A.: A variety of nonlinear retarded integral inequalities of Gronwall type and their applications. In: Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications, pp. 143–164. Springer, Berlin (2018)
El-Deeb, A.A.: On some generalizations of nonlinear dynamic inequalities on time scales and their applications. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math.
El-Deeb, A.A., Ahmed, R.G.: On some explicit bounds on certain retarded nonlinear integral inequalities with applications. Adv. Inequal. Appl. 2016, Article ID 15 (2016)
El-Deeb, A.A., Ahmed, R.G.: On some generalizations of certain nonlinear retarded integral inequalities for Volterra–Fredholm integral equations and their applications in delay differential equations. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 25(3), 279–285 (2017)
El-Deeb, A.A., Cheung, W.-S.: A variety of dynamic inequalities on time scales with retardation. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 11(10), 1185–1206 (2018)
El-Deeb, A.A., El-Sennary, H.A., Agarwal, P.: Some Opial-type inequalities with higher order delta derivatives on time scales. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 114(1), 29 (2020)
El-Deeb, A.A., El-Sennary, H.A., Khan, Z.A.: Some Steffensen-type dynamic inequalities on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 246 (2019)
El-Deeb, A.A., Elsennary, H.A., Cheung, W.-S.: Some reverse Hölder inequalities with Specht’s ratio on time scales. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 11(4), 444–455 (2018)
El-Deeb, A.A., Elsennary, H.A., Nwaeze, E.R.: Generalized weighted Ostrowski, trapezoid and Grüss type inequalities on time scales. Fasc. Math. 60, 123–144 (2018)
El-Deeb, A.A., Kh, F.M., Ismail, G.A.F., Khan, Z.A.: Weighted dynamic inequalities of Opial-type on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019(1), 393 (2019)
El-Deeb, A.A., Xu, H., Abdeldaim, A., Wang, G.: Some dynamic inequalities on time scales and their applications. Adv. Differ. Equ. 130, 19 (2019)
El-Owaidy, H., Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: On some new retarded nonlinear integral inequalities and their applications. Math. Sci. Lett. 3(3), 157 (2014)
El-Owaidy, H.M., Ragab, A.A., Eldeeb, A.A., Abuelela, W.M.K.: On some new nonlinear integral inequalities of Gronwall–Bellman type. Kyungpook Math. J. 54(4), 555–575 (2014)
Fan, M., Tian, Y., Meng, F.: A class of dynamic integral inequalities with mixed nonlinearities and their applications in partial dynamic systems. Adv. Differ. Equ. 12, 13 (2019)
Hilger, S.: Ein maßkettenkalkül mit anwendung auf zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten. PhD thesis, Universität Würzburg (1988)
Hilscher, R.: A time scales version of a Wirtinger-type inequality and applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 141(1–2), 219–226 (2002)
Kh, F.M., El-Deeb, A.A., Abdeldaim, A., Khan, Z.A., et al.: On some generalizations of dynamic Opial-type inequalities on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019(1), 1 (2019)
Li, J.D.: Opial-type integral inequalities involving several higher order derivatives. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 167(1), 98–110 (1992)
Li, W.N.: Some delay integral inequalities on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl. 59(6), 1929–1936 (2010)
Řehák, P.: Hardy inequality on time scales and its application to half-linear dynamic equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 5, 495–507 (2005)
Saker, S.H., El-Deeb, A.A., Rezk, H.M., Agarwal, R.P.: On Hilbert’s inequality on time scales. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 11(2), 399–423 (2017)
Tian, Y., El-Deeb, A.A., Meng, F.: Some nonlinear delay Volterra–Fredholm type dynamic integral inequalities on time scales. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018, Article ID 5841985 (2018)
Tian, Y., Fan, M., Meng, F.: A generalization of retarded integral inequalities in two independent variables and their applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 221, 239–248 (2013)
Acknowledgements
We are immensely thankful to the editor and anonymous referees for their valuable remarks, which helped to improve the paper.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have equally contributed to the manuscript, and read and approved it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors announce that there are not any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Deeb, A.A., Khan, Z.A. Certain new dynamic nonlinear inequalities in two independent variables and applications. Bound Value Probl 2020, 31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01338-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01338-z
Keywords
- Gronwall-type inequality
- Boundedness
- Time scales