- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
Minimal Nonnegative Solution of Nonlinear Impulsive Differential Equations on Infinite Interval
Boundary Value Problems volume 2011, Article number: 684542 (2011)
Abstract
The cone theory and monotone iterative technique are used to investigate the minimal nonnegative solution of nonlocal boundary value problems for second-order nonlinear impulsive differential equations on an infinite interval with an infinite number of impulsive times. All the existing results obtained in previous papers on nonlocal boundary value problems are under the case of the boundary conditions with no impulsive effects or the boundary conditions with impulsive effects on a finite interval with a finite number of impulsive times, so our work is new. Meanwhile, an example is worked out to demonstrate the main results.
1. Introduction
The theory of impulsive differential equations describes processes which experience a sudden change of their state at certain moments. Processes with such a character arise naturally and often, especially in phenomena studied in physics, chemical technology, population dynamics, biotechnology, and economics. The theory of impulsive differential equations has become an important area of investigation in the recent years and is much richer than the corresponding theory of differential equations. For an introduction of the basic theory of impulsive differential equations in see Lakshmikantham et al. [1], Bainov and Simeonov [2], and SamoÄlenko and Perestyuk [3] and the references therein.
Usually, we only consider the differential equation, integrodifferential equation, functional differential equations, or dynamic equations on time scales on a finite interval with a finite number of impulsive times. To identify a few, we refer the reader to [4–13] and references therein. In particular, we would like to mention some results of Guo and Liu [5] and Guo [6]. In [5], by using fixed-point index theory for cone mappings, Guo and Liu investigated the existence of multiple positive solutions of a boundary value problem for the following second-order impulsive differential equation:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ1_HTML.gif)
where is a cone in the real Banach space
,
denotes the zero element of
,
for
and
.
In [6], by using fixed-point theory, Guo established the existence of solutions of a boundary value problem for the following second-order impulsive differential equation in a Banach space
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ2_HTML.gif)
where ,
, and
.
On the other hand, the readers can also find some recent developments and applications of the case that impulse effects on a finite interval with a finite number of impulsive times to a variety of problems from Nieto and RodrÃguez-López [14–16], Jankowski [17–19], Lin and Jiang [20], Ma and Sun [21], He and Yu [22], Feng and Xie [23], Yan [24], Benchohra et al. [25], and Benchohra et al. [26].
Recently, in [27], Li and Nieto obtained some new results of the case that impulse effects on an infinite interval with a finite number of impulsive times. By using a fixed-point theorem due to Avery and Peterson [28], Li and Nieto considered the existence of multiple positive solutions of the following impulsive boundary value problem on an infinite interval:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ3_HTML.gif)
where .
At the same time, we also notice that there has been increasing interest in studying nonlinear differential equation and impulsive integrodifferential equation on an infinite interval with an infinite number of impulsive times; to identify a few, we refer the reader to Guo and Liu [29], Guo [30–32], and Li and Shen [33]. It is here worth mentioning the works by Guo [31]. In [31], Guo investigated the minimal nonnegative solution of the following initial value problem for a second order nonlinear impulsive integrodifferential equation of Volterra type on an infinite interval with an infinite number of impulsive times in a Banach space :
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ4_HTML.gif)
where as
is a cone of
.
However, the corresponding theory for nonlocal boundary value problems for impulsive differential equations on an infinite interval with an infinite number of impulsive times is not investigated till now. Now, in this paper, we will use the cone theory and monotone iterative technique to investigate the existence of minimal nonnegative solution for a class of second-order nonlinear impulsive differential equations on an infinite interval with an infinite number of impulsive times.
Consider the following boundary value problem for second-order nonlinear impulsive differential equation:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ5_HTML.gif)
where with
.
denotes the jump of
at
, that is,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ6_HTML.gif)
where and
represent the right-hand limit and left-hand limit of
at
, respectively.
has a similar meaning for
.
Let
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ7_HTML.gif)
Let with the norm
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ8_HTML.gif)
Define a cone by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ9_HTML.gif)
Let .
is called a nonnegative solution of (1.5), if
and
satisfies (1.5).
If , then boundary value problem (1.5) reduces to the following two point boundary value problem:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ10_HTML.gif)
which has been intensively studied; see Ma [34], Agarwal and O'Regan [35], Constantin [36], Liu [37, 38], and Yan and Liu [39] for some references along this line.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we provide some necessary background. In Section 3, the main result of problem (1.5) will be stated and proved. In Section 4, we give an example to illustrate how the main results can be used in practice.
2. Preliminaries
To establish the existence of minimal nonnegative solution in of problem (1.5), let us list the following assumptions, which will stand throughout this paper.
Suppose that
and there exist
and nonnegative constants
such that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ11_HTML.gif)
for
Lemma 2.1.
Suppose that holds. Then for all
,
,
and
are convergent.
Proof.
By we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ12_HTML.gif)
Thus,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ13_HTML.gif)
The proof is complete.
Lemma 2.2.
Suppose that holds. If
, then
is a solution of problem (1.5) if and only if
is a solution of the following impulsive integral equation:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ14_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ15_HTML.gif)
Proof.
First, suppose that is a solution of problem (1.5). It is easy to see by integration of (1.5) that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ16_HTML.gif)
Taking limit for , by Lemma 2.1 and the boundary conditions, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ17_HTML.gif)
Thus,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ18_HTML.gif)
Integrating (2.8), we can get
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ19_HTML.gif)
It follows that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ20_HTML.gif)
So we have (2.4).
Conversely, suppose that is a solution of (2.4). Evidently,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ21_HTML.gif)
Direct differentiation of (2.4) implies, for
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ22_HTML.gif)
So . It is easy to verify that
. The proof of Lemma 2.2 is complete.
Define an operator
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ23_HTML.gif)
Lemma 2.3.
Assume that and
hold. Then operator
maps
into
, and
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ24_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ25_HTML.gif)
Moreover, for with
one has
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ26_HTML.gif)
Proof.
Let . From the definition of
and
, we can obtain that
is an operator from
into
, and
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ27_HTML.gif)
Direct differentiation of (2.13) implies, for
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ28_HTML.gif)
Thus we have It follows that (2.14) is satisfied. Equation (2.16) is easily obtained by
.
3. Main Result
In this section, we establish the existence of a minimal nonnegative solution for problem (1.5).
Theorem 3.1.
Let conditions be satisfied. Suppose further that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ29_HTML.gif)
Then problem (1.5) has the minimal nonnegative solution with
, where
is defined as in Lemma 2.3. Here, the meaning of minimal nonnegative solution is that if
is an arbitrary nonnegative solution of (1.5), then
Moreover, if we let
then
with
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ30_HTML.gif)
and and
converge uniformly to
and
on
, respectively.
Proof.
By Lemma 2.3 and the definition of operator , we have
, and
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ31_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ32_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ33_HTML.gif)
By (3.3), we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ34_HTML.gif)
From (3.4), (3.5), and (3.6), we know that and
exist. Suppose that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ35_HTML.gif)
By the definition of we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ36_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ37_HTML.gif)
From (3.6), we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ38_HTML.gif)
It follows that is equicontinuous on every
Combining this with Ascoli-Arzela theorem and diagonal process, there exists a subsequence which converges uniformly to
on
. Which together with (3.4) imply that
converges uniformly to
on
, and
On the other hand, by
(3.6), and (3.9), we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ39_HTML.gif)
Since is bounded on
(M is a finite positive number),
is equicontinuous on every
Combining this with Ascoli-Arzela theorem and diagonal process, there exists a subsequence which converges uniformly to
on
, which together with (3.5) imply that
converges uniformly to
on
, and
From above, we know that
exists and
It follows that
and
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ40_HTML.gif)
Now we prove that
By the continuity of and the uniform convergence of
, we know that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ41_HTML.gif)
On the other hand, by and (3.6) and (3.12), we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ42_HTML.gif)
Combining this with the dominated convergence theorem, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ43_HTML.gif)
Moreover, we can see that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ44_HTML.gif)
Now taking limits from two sides of and using (3.15)–(3.16), we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ45_HTML.gif)
By Lemma 2.2, is a nonnegative solution of (1.5).
Suppose that is an arbitrary nonnegative solution of (1.5). Then
It is clear that
. Suppose that
By (2.16) we have
This means that
Taking limit, we have
. The proof of Theorem 3.1 is complete.
4. Example
To illustrate how our main results can be used in practice, we present an example.
Example 4.1.
Consider the following boundary value problem of second-order impulsive differential equation on infinite interval
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ46_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ47_HTML.gif)
Evidently, is not the solution of (4.1).
Conclusion
Problem (4.1) has minimal positive solution.
Proof.
It is clear that and
is satisfied.
By the inequality we see that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ48_HTML.gif)
Let
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ49_HTML.gif)
Then, we easily obtain that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F684542/MediaObjects/13661_2010_Article_52_Equ50_HTML.gif)
Thus, is satisfied and
. By Theorem 3.1, it follows that problem (4.1) has a minimal positive solution.
References
Lakshmikantham V, BaÄnov DD, Simeonov PS: Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations, Series in Modern Applied Mathematics. Volume 6. World Scientific, Teaneck, NJ, USA; 1989:xii+273.
BaÄnov DD, Simeonov PS: Systems with Impulse Effect: Stability, Theory and Application, Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and Its Applications. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK; 1989:255.
SamoÄlenko AM, Perestyuk NA: Impulsive Differential Equations, World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science. Series A: Monographs and Treatises. Volume 14. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA; 1995:x+462.
Guo D: Multiple positive solutions of impulsive nonlinear Fredholm integral equations and applications. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1993, 173(1):318-324. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1069
Guo D, Liu X: Multiple positive solutions of boundary-value problems for impulsive differential equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1995, 25(4):327-337. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00175-H
Guo D: Existence of solutions of boundary value problems for nonlinear second order impulsive differential equations in Banach spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1994, 181(2):407-421. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1031
Guo D: Periodic boundary value problems for second order impulsive integro-differential equations in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1997, 28(6):983-997. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)82855-6
Liu X: Monotone iterative technique for impulsive differential equations in a Banach space. Journal of Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1990, 24(3):183-191.
Vatsala AS, Sun Y: Periodic boundary value problems of impulsive differential equations. Applicable Analysis 1992, 44(3-4):145-158. 10.1080/00036819208840074
Nieto JJ: Basic theory for nonresonance impulsive periodic problems of first order. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1997, 205(2):423-433. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5207
He Z, Ge W: Periodic boundary value problem for first order impulsive delay differential equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1999, 104(1):51-63. 10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10059-0
Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: Impulsive functional differential equations with variable times. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2004, 47(10-11):1659-1665. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.013
Benchohra M, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: Existence results for second order boundary value problem of impulsive dynamic equations on time scales. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2004, 296(1):65-73. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.057
Nieto JJ, RodrÃguez-López R: New comparison results for impulsive integro-differential equations and applications. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007, 328(2):1343-1368. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.029
Nieto JJ, RodrÃguez-López R: Monotone method for first-order functional differential equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2006, 52(3-4):471-484. 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.01.012
Nieto JJ, RodrÃguez-López R: Periodic boundary value problem for non-Lipschitzian impulsive functional differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 318(2):593-610. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.014
Jankowski T: Positive solutions of three-point boundary value problems for second order impulsive differential equations with advanced arguments. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2008, 197(1):179-189. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.081
Jankowski T: Positive solutions to second order four-point boundary value problems for impulsive differential equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2008, 202(2):550-561. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.02.040
Jankowski T: Existence of solutions for second order impulsive differential equations with deviating arguments. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2007, 67(6):1764-1774. 10.1016/j.na.2006.08.020
Lin X, Jiang D: Multiple positive solutions of Dirichlet boundary value problems for second order impulsive differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 321(2):501-514. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.07.076
Ma Y, Sun J: Stability criteria for impulsive systems on time scales. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2008, 213(2):400-407. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.040
He Z, Yu J: Periodic boundary value problem for first-order impulsive functional differential equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2002, 138(2):205-217. 10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00381-8
Feng M, Xie D: Multiple positive solutions of multi-point boundary value problem for second-order impulsive differential equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2009, 223(1):438-448. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.01.024
Yan J: Existence of positive periodic solutions of impulsive functional differential equations with two parameters. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007, 327(2):854-868. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.04.018
Benchohra M, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: Extremal solutions of second order impulsive dynamic equations on time scales. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006, 324(1):425-434. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.028
Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas SK: Impulsive Differential Equations and Inclusions. Hindawi, New York, NY, USA; 2006.
Li J, Nieto JJ: Existence of positive solutions for multipoint boundary value problem on the half-line with impulses. Boundary Value Problems 2009, 2009:-12.
Avery RI, Peterson AC: Three positive fixed points of nonlinear operators on ordered Banach spaces. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2001, 42(3–5):313-322.
Guo D, Liu XZ: Impulsive integro-differential equations on unbounded domain in a Banach space. Nonlinear Studies 1996, 3(1):49-57.
Guo D: Boundary value problems for impulsive integro-differential equations on unbounded domains in a Banach space. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1999, 99(1):1-15. 10.1016/S0096-3003(97)10174-6
Guo D: Second order impulsive integro-differential equations on unbounded domains in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1999, 35(4):413-423. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00564-6
Guo D: Multiple positive solutions for first order nonlinear impulsive integro-differential equations in a Banach space. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2003, 143(2-3):233-249. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00356-9
Li J, Shen J: Existence of positive solution for second-order impulsive boundary value problems on infinity intervals. Boundary Value Problems 2006, 2006:-11.
Ma R: Existence of positive solutions for second-order boundary value problems on infinity intervals. Applied Mathematics Letters 2003, 16(1):33-39. 10.1016/S0893-9659(02)00141-6
Agarwal RP, O'Regan D: Boundary value problems of nonsingular type on the semi-infinite interval. The Tohoku Mathematical Journal 1999, 51(3):391-397. 10.2748/tmj/1178224769
Constantin A: On an infinite interval boundary value problem. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata. Serie Quarta 1999, 176: 379-394. 10.1007/BF02506002
Liu Y: Existence and unboundedness of positive solutions for singular boundary value problems on half-line. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2003, 144(2-3):543-556. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00431-9
Liu Y: Boundary value problems for second order differential equations on unbounded domains in a Banach space. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2003, 135(2-3):569-583. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00070-X
Yan B, Liu Y: Unbounded solutions of the singular boundary value problems for second order differential equations on the half-line. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2004, 147(3):629-644. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00801-9
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10771065), the Natural Sciences Foundation of Hebei Province (A2007001027), the Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (PHR201008430), the Scientific Research Common Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education(KM201010772018), the 2010 level of scientific research of improving project (5028123900), and Beijing Municipal Education Commission(71D0911003). The authors thank the referee for his/her careful reading of the paper and useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Yang, X. & Feng, M. Minimal Nonnegative Solution of Nonlinear Impulsive Differential Equations on Infinite Interval. Bound Value Probl 2011, 684542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/684542
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/684542