We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

# Exponential energy decay and blow-up of solutions for a system of nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations with strong damping

## Abstract

In this paper, we consider the system of nonlinear viscoelastic equations

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ - Δ u t = f 1 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , v t t - Δ v + ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ - Δ v t = f 2 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T )$

with initial and Dirichlet boundary conditions. We prove that, under suitable assumptions on the functions g i , f i (i = 1, 2) and certain initial data in the stable set, the decay rate of the solution energy is exponential. Conversely, for certain initial data in the unstable set, there are solutions with positive initial energy that blow up in finite time.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 35L05; 35L55; 35L70.

## 1. Introduction

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ - Δ u t = f 1 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , v t t - Δ v + ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ - Δ v t = f 2 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , t ) = v ( x , t ) = 0 , x ∈ ∂ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , u t ( x , 0 ) = u 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω , v ( x , 0 ) = v 0 ( x ) , v t ( x , 0 ) = v 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω ,$
(1.1)

where Ω is a bounded domain in n with a smooth boundary ∂Ω, and g i (·) : ++, f i (·, ·): 2 (i = 1, 2) are given functions to be specified later. Here, u and v denote the transverse displacements of waves. This problem arises in the theory of viscoelastic and describes the interaction of two scalar fields, we can refer to Cavalcanti et al. , Messaoudi and Tatar , Renardy et al. .

To motivate this study, let us recall some results regarding single viscoelastic wave equation. Cavalcanti et al.  studied the following equation:

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ + a ( x ) u t + | u | γ u = 0 , i n Ω × ( 0 , ∞ )$

for a : Ω → +, a function, which may be null on a part of the domain Ω. Under the conditions that a(x) ≥ a0 > 0 on Ω1 Ω, with Ω1 satisfying some geometry restrictions and

$- ξ 1 g ( t ) ≤ g ′ ( t ) ≤ - ξ 2 g ( t ) , t ≥ 0 ,$

the authors established an exponential rate of decay. This latter result has been improved by Cavalcanti and Oquendo  and Berrimi and Messaoudi . In their study, Cavalcanti and Oquendo  considered the situation where the internal dissipation acts on a part of Ω and the viscoelastic dissipation acts on the other part. They established both exponential and polynomial decay results under the conditions on g and its derivatives up to the third order, whereas Berrimi and Messaoudi  allowed the internal dissipation to be nonlinear. They also showed that the dissipation induced by the integral term is strong enough to stabilize the system and established an exponential decay for the solution energy provided that g satisfies a relation of the form

$g ′ ( t ) ≤ - ξ g ( t ) , t ≥ 0 .$

Cavalcanti et al.  also studied, in a bounded domain, the following equation:

$| u t | ρ u t t - Δ u - Δ u t t + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ - γ Δ u t = 0 ,$

ρ > 0, and proved a global existence result for γ ≥ 0 and an exponential decay for γ > 0. This result has been extended by Messaoudi and Tatar [2, 7] to the situation where γ = 0 and exponential and polynomial decay results in the absence, as well as in the presence, of a source term have been established. Recently, Messaoudi [8, 9] considered

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ = b | u | γ u , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , ∞ ) ,$

for b = 0 and b = 1 and for a wider class of relaxation functions. He established a more general decay result, for which the usual exponential and polynomial decay results are just special cases.

For the finite time blow-up of a solution, the single viscoelastic wave equation of the form

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ + h ( u t ) = f ( u )$
(1.2)

in Ω × (0, ∞) with initial and boundary conditions has extensively been studied. See in this regard, Kafini and Messaoudi , Messaoudi [11, 12], Song and Zhong , Wang . For instance, Messaoudi  studied (1.2) for h(u t ) = a|u t |m-2u t and f(u) = b|u|p-2u and proved a blow-up result for solutions with negative initial energy if p > m ≥ 2 and a global result for 2 ≤ pm. This result has been later improved by Messaoudi  to accommodate certain solutions with positive initial energy. Song and Zhong  considered (1.2) for h(u t ) = -Δu t and f(u) = |u|p-2u and proved a blow-up result for solutions with positive initial energy using the ideas of the "potential well'' theory introduced by Payne and Sattinger .

This study is also motivated by the research of the well-known Klein-Gordon system

$u t t - Δ u + m 1 u + k 1 u v 2 = 0 , v t t - Δ v + m 2 v + k 2 u 2 v = 0 ,$

which arises in the study of quantum field theory . See also Medeiros and Miranda , Zhang  for some generalizations of this system and references therein. As far as we know, the problem (1.1) with the viscoelastic effect described by the memory terms has not been well studied. Recently, Han and Wang  considered the following problem

$u t t - Δ u + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ + | u t | m - 1 u t = f 1 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , v t t - Δ v + ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ + | v t | r - 1 v t = f 2 ( u , v ) , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , t ) = v ( x , t ) = 0 , x ∈ ∂ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , u t ( x , 0 ) = u 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω , v ( x , 0 ) = v 0 ( x ) , v t ( x , 0 ) = v 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω ,$

where Ω is a bounded domain with smooth boundary ∂Ω in n , n = 1, 2, 3. Under suitable assumptions on the functions g i , f i (i = 1, 2), the initial data and the parameters in the equations, they established several results concerning local existence, global existence, uniqueness, and finite time blow-up (the initial energy E(0) < 0) property. This latter blow-up result has been improved by Messaoudi and Said-Houari , to certain solutions with positive initial energy. Liu  studied the following system

$| u t | ρ u t t - Δ u - γ 1 Δ u t t + ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ + f ( u , v ) = 0 , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , | v t | ρ v t t - Δ v - γ 2 Δ v t t + ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ + k ( u , v ) = 0 , ( x , t ) ∈ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , t ) = v ( x , t ) = 0 , x ∈ ∂ Ω × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , u t ( x , 0 ) = u 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω , v ( x , 0 ) = v 0 ( x ) , v t ( x , 0 ) = v 1 ( x ) , x ∈ Ω ,$

where Ω is a bounded domain with smooth boundary ∂Ω in n , γ1, γ2 ≥ 0 are constants and ρ is a real number such that 0 < ρ ≤ 2/(n - 2) if n ≥ 3 or ρ > 0 if n = 1, 2. Under suitable assumptions on the functions g(s), h(s), f(u, v), k(u, v), they used the perturbed energy method to show that the dissipations given by the viscoelastic terms are strong enough to ensure exponential or polynomial decay of the solutions energy, depending on the decay rate of the relaxation functions g(s) and h(s). For the problem (1.1) in n , we mention the work of Kafini and Messaoudi .

Motivated by the above research, we consider in this study the coupled system (1.1). We prove that, under suitable assumptions on the functions g i , f i (i = 1, 2) and certain initial data in the stable set, the decay rate of the solution energy is exponential. Conversely, for certain initial data in the unstable set, there are solutions with positive initial energy that blow up in finite time.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some assumptions and definitions needed for this study. Section 3 is devoted to the proof of the uniform decay result. In Section 4, we prove the blow-up result.

## 2. Preliminaries

First, let us introduce some notation used throughout this article. We denote by || · || q the Lq (Ω) norm for 1 ≤ q ≤ ∞ and by || · ||2 the Dirichlet norm in $H 0 1 ( Ω )$ which is equivalent to the H1(Ω)norm. Moreover, we set

$( φ , ψ ) = ∫ Ω φ ( x ) ψ ( x ) d x$

as the usual L2(Ω) inner product.

Concerning the functions f1(u, v) and f2(u, v), we take

$f 1 ( u , v ) = [ a | u + v | 2 ( p + 1 ) ( u + v ) + b | u | p u | v | ( p + 2 ) ] , f 2 ( u , v ) = [ a | u + v | 2 ( p + 1 ) ( u + v ) + b | u | ( p + 2 ) | v | p v ] ,$

where a, b > 0 are constants and p satisfies

$p > - 1 , i f n = 1 , 2 , - 1 < p ≤ 1 , i f n = 3 .$
(2.1)

One can easily verify that

$u f 1 ( u , v ) + v f 2 ( u , v ) = 2 ( p + 2 ) F ( u , v ) , ∀ ( u , v ) ∈ ℝ 2 ,$

where

$F ( u , v ) = 1 2 ( p + 2 ) [ a | u + v | 2 ( p + 2 ) + 2 b | u v | p + 2 ] .$

For the relaxation functions g i (t) (i = 1, 2), we assume

(G1) g i (t) : ++ belong to C1(+) and satisfy

$g i ( t ) ≥ 0 , g i ′ ( t ) ≤ 0 , f o r t ≥ 0$

and

$1 - ∫ 0 ∞ g i ( s ) d s = k i > 0 .$

(G2) $max ∫ 0 ∞ g 1 ( s ) d s , ∫ 0 ∞ g 2 ( s ) d s < 4 ( p + 1 ) ( p + 2 ) 4 ( p + 1 ) ( p + 2 ) + 1$.

We next state the local existence and the uniqueness of the solution of problem (1.1), whose proof can be found in Han and Wang  (Theorem 2.1) with slight modification, so we will omit its proof. In the proof, the authors adopted the technique of Agre and Rammaha  which consists of constructing approximations by the Faedo-Galerkin procedure without imposing the usual smallness conditions on the initial data to handle the source terms. Unfortunately, due to the strong nonlinearities on f1 and f2, the techniques used by Han and Wang  and Agre and Rammaha  allowed them to prove the local existence result only for n ≤ 3. We note that the local existence result in the case of n > 3 is still open. For related results, we also refer the reader to Said-Houari and Messaoudi  and Messaoudi and Said-Houari . So throughout this article, we have assumed that n ≤ 3.

Theorem 2.1. Assume that (2.1) and (G 1) hold, and that$( u 0 , u 1 ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × L 2 ( Ω )$, $( v 0 , v 1 ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × L 2 ( Ω )$. Then problem (1.1) has a unique local solution

$u , v ∈ C ( [ 0 , T ) ; H 0 1 ( Ω ) ) , u t , v t ∈ C ( [ 0 , T ) ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) ∩ L 2 ( [ 0 , T ) ; H 0 1 ( Ω ) )$

for some T > 0. If T < ∞, then

$lim t → T ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 ) = ∞ .$
(2.2)

Finally, we define

$I ( t ) = ( 1 - ∫ 0 t g 1 ( τ ) d τ ) | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + 1 - ∫ 0 t g 2 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + [ ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ] - 2 ( p + 2 ) ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x ,$
(2.3)
$J ( t ) = 1 2 1 - ∫ 0 t g 1 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + 1 - ∫ 0 t g 2 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + 1 2 [ ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ] - ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x ,$
(2.4)

such functionals we could refer to Muñoz Rivera [24, 25]. We also define the energy function as follows

$E ( t ) = 1 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 + J ( t ) ,$
(2.5)

where

$( g i ∘ w ) ( t ) = ∫ 0 t g i ( t - τ ) | | w ( t ) - w ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ .$

## 3. Global existence and energy decay

In this section, we deal with the uniform exponential decay of the energy for system (1.1) by using the perturbed energy method. Before we state and prove our main result, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 3.1. Assume (2.1) and (G 1) hold. Let (u, v) be the solution of the system (1.1), then the energy functional is a decreasing function, that is

$E ′ ( t ) = - | | ∇ u t ( t ) | | 2 2 - | | ∇ v t ( t ) | | 2 2 + 1 2 ( g ′ 1 ∘ u ) ( t ) + 1 2 ( g ′ 2 ∘ v ) ( t ) - 1 2 g 1 ( t ) | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 - 1 2 g 2 ( t ) | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ≤ 0 .$
(3.1)

Moreover, the following energy inequality holds:

$E ( t ) + ∫ s t ( | | ∇ u t ( τ ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v t ( τ ) | | 2 2 ) d τ ≤ E ( s ) , f o r 0 ≤ s ≤ t < T .$
(3.2)

Lemma 3.2. Let (2.1) hold. Then, there exists η > 0 such that for any$( u , v ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × H 0 1 ( Ω )$, we have

$| | u + v | | 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) + 2 | | u v | | p + 2 p + 2 ≤ η ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) p + 2 .$
(3.3)

Proof. The proof is almost the same that of Said-Houari , so we omit it here. □

To prove our result and for the sake of simplicity, we take a = b = 1 and introduce the following:

$B = η 1 2 ( p + 2 ) , α * = B - p + 2 P + 1 , E 1 = 1 2 - 1 2 ( p + 2 ) α * 2 ,$
(3.4)

where η is the optimal constant in (3.3). The following lemma will play an essential role in the proof of our main result, and it is similar to a lemma used first by Vitillaro , to study a class of a single wave equation, which introduces a potential well.

Lemma 3.3. Let (2.1) and (G 1) hold. Let (u, v) be the solution of the system (1.1). Assume further that E(0) < E1and

$( k 1 | | ∇ u 0 | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v 0 | | 2 2 ) 1 ∕ 2 < α * ,$
(3.5)

Then

$( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ) 1 ∕ 2 < α * , f o r t ∈ [ 0 , T ) .$
(3.6)

Proof. We first note that, by (2.5), (3.3) and the definition of B, we have

$E ( t ) ≥ 1 2 ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ) - 1 2 ( p + 2 ) ( | | u + v | | 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) + 2 | | u v | | p + 2 p + 2 ) ≥ 1 2 ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ) - B 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) p + 2 ≥ 1 2 α 2 - B 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) α 2 ( p + 2 ) = g ( α ) ,$
(3.7)

where $α = ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) ) 1 / 2$. It is not hard to verify that g is increasing for 0 < α < α*, decreasing for α > α*, g(α) → - ∞ as α → +∞, and

$g ( α * ) = 1 2 α * 2 - B 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) α * 2 ( p + 2 ) = E 1 ,$

where α* is given in (3.4). Now we establish (3.6) by contradiction. Suppose (3.6) does not hold, then it follows from the continuity of (u(t), v(t)) that there exists t0 (0, T) such that

$( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t 0 ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t 0 ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t 0 ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t 0 ) ) 1 ∕ 2 = α * .$

By (3.7), we observe that

$E ( t 0 ) ≥ g ( k 1 | | ∇ u ( t 0 ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t 0 ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t 0 ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t 0 ) ) 1 ∕ 2 = g ( α * ) = E 1 .$

This is impossible since E(t) ≤ E(0) < E1 for all t [0, T). Hence (3.6) is established. □

The following integral inequality plays an important role in our proof of the energy decay of the solutions to problem (1.1).

Lemma 3.4. Assume that the function φ : + {0} → + {0} is a non-increasing function and that there exists a constant c > 0 such that

$∫ t ∞ φ ( s ) d s ≤ c φ ( t )$

for every t [0, ∞). Then

$φ ( t ) ≤ φ ( 0 ) exp ( 1 - t / c )$

for every tc.

Theorem 3.5. Let (2.1) and (G 1) hold. If the initial data$( u 0 , u 1 ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × L 2 ( Ω )$, $( v 0 , v 1 ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × L 2 ( Ω )$satisfy E(0) < E1and

$( k 1 | | ∇ u 0 | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v 0 | | 2 2 ) 1 ∕ 2 < α * ,$
(3.8)

where the constants α*, E1are defined in (3.4), then the corresponding solution to (1.1) globally exists, i.e. T = ∞. Moreover, if the initial energy E(0) and k such that

$1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) - 5 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) 2 k ( p + 1 ) > 0 ,$

where k = min{k1, k2}, then the energy decay is

$E ( t ) ≤ E ( 0 ) exp ( 1 - a C - 1 t )$

for every taC-1, where C is some positive constant.

Proof. In order to get T = ∞, by (2.2), it suffices to show that

$| | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2$

is bounded independently of t. Since E(0) < E1 and

$( k 1 | | ∇ u 0 | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v 0 | | 2 2 ) 1 ∕ 2 < α * ,$

it follows from Lemma 3.3 that

$k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ≤ k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) + ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) < α * 2 ,$

which implies that

where we have used (3.3). Furthermore, by (2.3) and (2.4), we get

from which, the definition of E(t) and E(t) ≤ E(0), we deduce that

$k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ≤ 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) J ( t ) ≤ 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( t ) ≤ 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ,$
(3.9)

for t [0, T). So it follows from (16) and Lemma 3.1 that

which implies

$| | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 < C E 1 ,$

where C is a positive constant depending only on p.

Next we want to derive the decay rate of energy function for problem (1.1). By multiplying the first equation of system (1.1) by u and the second equation of system (1.1) by v, integrating over Ω × [t1, t2] (0 ≤ t1t2), using integration by parts and summing up, we have

$∫ Ω u t ( t ) u ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 - ∫ t 1 t 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + ∫ Ω v t ( t ) v ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 - ∫ t 1 t 2 | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t = - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ u ( t ) , ∇ u t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ v ( t ) , ∇ v t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ u ( t ) d x d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ v ( t ) d x d t + 2 ( p + 2 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x d t ,$

which implies

$2 ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t - 2 ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x d t = - ∫ Ω u t ( t ) u ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 - ∫ Ω v t ( t ) v ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ u ( t ) , ∇ u t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ v ( t ) , ∇ v t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ u ( t ) d x d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ v ( t ) d x d t .$
(3.10)

For the 11th term on the right-hand side of (3.10), one has

$- 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) Δ u ( τ ) d τ u ( t ) d x = 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) ∇ u ( τ ) ∇ u ( t ) d τ d x = ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 ) d τ - ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ u ( t ) - ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 ) d τ .$
(3.11)

Similarly,

$- 2 ∫ Ω ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) Δ v ( τ ) d τ v ( t ) d x = ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 ) d τ - ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ v ( t ) - ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 ) d τ .$
(3.12)

Combining (3.10), (3.11) with (3.12), we have

$2 ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t - 2 ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x d t = - ∫ Ω u t ( t ) u ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 - ∫ Ω v t ( t ) v ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) d t - 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( τ ) d τ | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ u ( t ) , ∇ u t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ v ( t ) , ∇ v t ( t ) ) d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t ≤ - ∫ Ω u t ( t ) u ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 - ∫ Ω v t ( t ) v ( t ) d x | t 1 t 2 + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ u ( t ) , ∇ u t ( t ) ) d t - ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ v ( t ) , ∇ v t ( t ) ) d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t .$
(3.13)

Now we estimate every term of the right-hand side of the (3.13). First, by Hölder's inequality and Poincaré's inequality

where λ being the first eigenvalue of the operator - Δ under homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Then, by (3.9), we see that

$∫ Ω | u ( t ) u t ( t ) | d x + ∫ Ω | v ( t ) v t ( t ) | d x ≤ c 1 E ( t ) ,$

where c1 is a constant independent on u and v, from which follows that

$∫ Ω | u ( t ) u t ( t ) | d x | t 1 t 2 + ∫ Ω | v ( t ) v t ( t ) | d x | t 1 t 2 ≤ 2 c 1 E ( t 1 ) .$
(3.14)

Since 0 ≤ J (t) ≤ E (t), from (3.2) we deduce that

$∫ t 1 t 2 ( | | ∇ u t ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v t ( t ) | | 2 2 ) d t ≤ E ( t 1 ) .$

Hence, by Poincaré inequality we get

$2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | u t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 | | v t ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ≤ 2 c 2 E ( t 1 ) ,$
(3.15)

where c2 is a constant independent on u and v. In addition, using Young's inequality for convolution ||f * g || q ≤ || f || r ||g|| s with 1/q = 1/r + 1/s - 1 and 1 ≤ q, r, s ≤ ∞, noting that if q = 1, then r = 1 and s = 1, we have

$∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t = | | g 1 * | | ∇ u | | 2 2 | | 1 ≤ | | g 1 | | 1 | | | | ∇ u | | 2 2 | | 1 = ∫ t 1 t 2 g 1 ( t ) d t ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ≤ ( 1 - k 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ,$
(3.16)

and

$∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t = | | g 2 * | | ∇ v | | 2 2 | | 1 ≤ | | g 2 | | 1 | | | | ∇ v | | 2 2 | | 1 = ∫ t 1 t 2 g 2 ( t ) d t ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ≤ ( 1 - k 2 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t .$
(3.17)

Hence, combining (3.9), (3.16) with (3.17) we then have

$∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 d τ d t ≤ ( 1 - k 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + ( 1 - k 2 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ≤ ( 1 - k ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ( | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) d t ≤ 2 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t .$
(3.18)

From (3.9), we also have

$∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d τ d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d τ d t ≤ ( 1 - k 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + ( 1 - k 2 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t ≤ ( 1 - k ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ( | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) d t ≤ 2 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t .$
(3.19)

Combining (3.18) with (3.19), we deduce that

$1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 1 ∘ ∇ u ) ( t ) d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 ( g 2 ∘ ∇ v ) ( t ) d t ≤ ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 1 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ u ( τ ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 ) d τ d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t g 2 ( t - τ ) ( | | ∇ v ( τ ) | | 2 2 + | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) d τ d t ≤ 4 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t .$
(3.20)

Finally, we also have the following estimate

$∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ u ( t ) , ∇ u t ( t ) ) d t + ∫ t 1 t 2 ( ∇ v ( t ) , ∇ v t ( t ) ) d t = 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 d d t | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 d t + 1 2 ∫ t 1 t 2 d d t | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 d t = 1 2 ( | | ∇ u ( t 2 ) | | 2 2 - | | ∇ u ( t 1 ) | | 2 2 ) + 1 2 ( | | ∇ v ( t 2 ) | | 2 2 - | | ∇ v ( t 1 ) | | 2 2 ) ≤ 2 ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) E ( t 1 ) ≤ c 3 E ( t 1 ) .$
(3.21)

where c3 is a constant independent on u and v. Combining (3.13)-(3.21), we obtain

$2 ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t - 2 ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x d t ≤ C E ( t 1 ) + 5 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t .$
(3.22)

where C is a constant independent on u.

On the other hand, from (3.3) and (3.9), we have

$2 ( p + 1 ) ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x = p + 1 p + 2 | | u + v | | 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) + 2 | | u v | | ( p + 2 ) ( p + 2 ) ≤ p + 1 p + 2 η ( k 1 | | ∇ u | | 2 2 + k 2 | | ∇ v | | 2 2 ) ( p + 2 ) ≤ 2 η 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( t ) ,$

which implies

$2 ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t - 2 ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 ∫ Ω F ( u , v ) d x d t ≥ 2 1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t .$
(3.23)

Note that E(0) < E1, we see that

$1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) > 0 .$

Thus, combining (3.22) with (3.23), we have

$2 1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t ≤ C E ( t 1 ) + 5 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t ,$

that is

$2 1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) - 5 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) 2 k ( p + 1 ) ∫ t 1 t 2 E ( t ) d t ≤ C E ( t 1 ) .$
(3.24)

Denote

$a = 2 1 - η ( 2 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) E ( 0 ) ) ( p + 1 ) - 5 ( 1 - k ) ( p + 2 ) 2 k ( p + 1 ) .$

We rewrite (3.24)

$a ∫ t ∞ E ( τ ) d τ ≤ C E ( t )$

for every t [0, ∞).

Since a > 0 from the assumption conditions, by Lemma 3.4, we obtain the following energy decay for problem (1.1) as

$E ( t ) < E ( 0 ) exp ( 1 - a C - 1 t )$

for every tCa-1. □

## 4. Blow-up of solution

In this section, we deal with the blow-up solutions of the system (1.1). Set

$θ i = k i - 1 4 ( p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) ∫ 0 ∞ g i ( s ) d s , i = 1 , 2 .$
(4.1)

From the assumption (G 2), we have θ i > 0 (i = 1, 2). Similarly Lemma 3.2, we have

Lemma 4.1. Assume (2.1) holds. Then there exists η1> 0 such that for any$( u , v ) ∈ H 0 1 ( Ω ) × H 0 1 ( Ω )$, we have

$| | u + v | | 2 ( p + 2 ) 2 ( p + 2 ) + 2 | | u v | | p + 2 p + 2 ≤ η 1 ( θ 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + θ 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) p + 2 ,$
(4.2)

where the constants θ i (i = 1, 2) are defined in (4.1).

To prove our result and for the sake of simplicity, we take a = b = 1 and introduce the following:

$B 1 = η 1 1 2 ( p + 2 ) , α * = B 1 - p + 2 p + 1 , E 2 = 1 2 - 1 2 ( p + 2 ) α * 2 .$
(4.3)

Then we have

Lemma 4.2. Let (G 1), G(2) and (2.1) hold. Let (u, v) be the solution of the system (1.1). Assume further that E(0) < E2and

$( θ 1 | | ∇ u 0 | | 2 2 + θ 2 | | ∇ v 0 | | 2 2 ) 1 ∕ 2 > α * ,$
(4.4)

where the constants θ i (i = 1, 2) are defined in (4.1). Then there exists a constant α2 > α*such that

$( θ 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + θ 2 | | ∇ v ( t ) | | 2 2 ) 1 ∕ 2 ≥ α 2 , f o r t ∈ ( 0 , T ) .$
(4.5)

Proof. We first note that, by (2.5), (4.2) and the definition of B1, we have

(4.6)

where $α = ( θ 1 | | ∇ u ( t ) | | 2 2 + θ 2$