A BDDC algorithm for the mortar-type rotated FEM for elliptic problems with discontinuous coefficients
© Jiang and Chen; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 14 January 2014
Accepted: 17 March 2014
Published: 3 April 2014
In this paper, we propose a BDDC preconditioner for the mortar-type rotated finite element method for second order elliptic partial differential equations with piecewise but discontinuous coefficients. We construct an auxiliary discrete space and build our algorithm on an equivalent auxiliary problem, and we present the BDDC preconditioner based on this constructed discrete space. Meanwhile, in the framework of the standard additive Schwarz methods, we describe this method by a complete variational form. We show that our method has a quasi-optimal convergence behavior, i.e., the condition number of the preconditioned problem is independent of the jumps of the coefficients, and depends only logarithmically on the ratio between the subdomain size and the mesh size. Numerical experiments are presented to confirm our theoretical analysis.
The method of balancing domain decomposition by constraints (BDDC) was first introduced by Dohrmann in . Mandel and Dohrmann restated the method in an abstract manner, and provided its convergence theory in . The BDDC method is closely related to the dual-primal FETI (FETI-DP) method , which is one of dual iterative substructuring methods. Each BDDC and FETI-DP method is defined in terms of a set of primal continuity. The primal continuity is enforced across the interface between the subdomains and provides a coarse space component of the preconditioner. In , Mandel, Dohrmann, and Tezaur analyzed the relation between the two methods and established the corresponding theory.
In the last decades, the two methods have been widely analyzed and successfully been extended to many different types of partial differential equations. In , the two algorithms for elliptic problems were rederived and a brief proof of the main result was given. A BDDC algorithm for mortar finite element was developed in , meanwhile, the author also extended the FETI-DP algorithm to elasticity problems and Stokes problems in [6, 7], respectively. These algorithms are based on locally conforming finite element methods, and the coarse space components of the algorithms are related to the cross-points (i.e., corners), which are often noteworthy points in domain decomposition methods (DDMs). Since the cross-points are related to more than two subregions, thus it is not convenient to design the domain decomposition algorithm.
The BDDC method derives from the Neumann-Neumann domain decomposition method (see ). The difference is that the BDDC method applies an additive rather than a multiplicative coarse grid correction, and substructure spaces have some constraints which result in non-singular subproblems. Thus we need not modify the bilinear forms on subdomains, and we can solve each subproblem and coarse problem in parallel.
The rotated element is an important nonconforming element. It was introduced by Rannacher and Turek in  for stokes equations originally, and it is the simplest example of a divergence-stable nonconforming element on quadrilaterals. Since its degree of freedom is integral average on element edge which is not related to the corners, and each degree of freedom on subdomain interfaces is only included in two neighboring subdomains, so it is easy to design the BDDC algorithm.
The mortar technique was introduced in . This method is nonconforming domain decomposition methods with nonoverlapping subdomains. The meshes on different subdomains need not align across subdomain interfaces, and the matching of discretizations on adjacent subdomains is only enforced weakly. This offers the advantages of freely choosing highly varying mesh sizes on different subdomains and is very promising to approximate the problems with abruptly changing diffusion coefficients or local anisotropic.
In this paper, we study the BDDC algorithm for the mortar-type rotated element for the second order elliptic problem with discontinuous coefficients, where the discontinuities lie only along the subdomain interfaces. Following the technique in , we construct an auxiliary discrete space and build our BDDC algorithm on an equivalent auxiliary problem. This approach overcomes the difficulty caused by the mortar condition and simplifies the implementation of the BDDC preconditioning iteration. Furthermore, since the rotated element is not related to the subdomain’s vertices, we can complete our theoretical analysis conveniently. It is proved that the condition number of the preconditioned operator is independent of the jumps of the coefficients and only depends logarithmically on the ratio between the subdomain size and mesh size. Numerical experiments are presented to confirm our theoretical analysis.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, we introduce the model problem and the auxiliary problem. Section 3 gives the BDDC algorithm and proposes the BDDC preconditioner. Several technical tools are presented and analyzed in Section 4. In Section 5, we give the proof of the main result. Last section provides numerical experiments. For convenience, the symbols ⪯, ⪰ and ≍ are used, and , , and mean that , , and for some constants , , , and that are independent of discontinuous coefficients and mesh size.
, the coefficients () are piecewise positive constants over ().
For simplicity, we only consider the geometrically conforming case, i.e., the intersection between the closure of two different subdomains is empty, or a vertex, or an edge. The subdomains together form a coarse partition , we denote the diameter of each by . Let be a quasi-uniform partition with the mesh size , made up of shape regular rectangles in . The resulted partition can be nonmatched across adjacent subdomain interfaces. We denote the sets of edges of the triangulation in and by , respectively, and let , be the sets of vertices of the triangulation that are in , respectively.
It can easily be shown that is positive definite on , which yields the existence and uniqueness of the discrete solution. The error estimate between the discrete and the continuous solution is discussed in .
Since the mortar condition depends on both the degrees of freedom on the interfaces and the ones near the interfaces, it is difficult to construct a preconditioner directly for (2.3). To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a new discrete space and an auxiliary problem which is equivalent to problem (2.3).
For each , we define an element that satisfies the following conditions:
for any ,(2.4)
for any ,(2.5)
where is a piecewise constant function on elements of such that for any . Note that the average value of on can be calculated by (2.5).
For the two related spaces and , we have the following result.
Lemma 2.1 ()
From the above lemma, we only need to construct a preconditioner for the operator .
3 BDDC algorithm
In this section, we introduce our BDDC preconditioner for problem (2.7) and describe the BDDC algorithm.
here . Let . We define ℋ as a corresponding piecewise harmonic operator on the auxiliary space by .
We define a space . The space is between and , and our BDDC preconditioner is mainly constructed on this space.
As we know, the technical aspect in DDMs is that the preconditioner includes a coarse problem which can enhance the convergence. In view of the characteristic of the space , we select the standard coarse space which is the rotated finite element space associated with the coarse partition , and it satisfies primal constraints on subdomain interfaces.
Denote . The coarse space and the product space play an important role in the description and analysis of our iterative method.
Define an extension operator as
for any , ;
for any , ;
for any , satisfies (2.5).
We also need to define another prolongation operator as follows:
if , then ;
if , , then ;
if , , , then ;
if , it follows from (2.5) that can be obtained by the edge average values on associated mortar sides;
In what follows, we describe our BDDC preconditioning algorithm, we apply the basic framework of additive Schwarz method (or parallel subspace correction method ). From the decomposition (3.1), we only need to choose appropriate subspace solvers.
Remark 3.1 The bilinear form on the coarse space can be different from that on substructure space, here we only use the exact solvers. On each subdomain, we avoid the possible singularity of local subproblem and we need not modify the bilinear forms.
We have the following main result.
4 Technical tools
In this section we state and prove a few technical lemmas necessary for the proof of Theorem 3.1. Our theoretical analysis is based on the substructuring theory of conforming elements.
For the operator , we have the following result.
Lemma 4.1 ()
Remark 4.1 The above lemma is related to vertex-edge-face arguments in substructuring methods, in view of the characteristic for the rotated element, here the results only concern the inequalities for faces.
Let be the conforming element space of bilinear continuous functions on the partition which is constructed by joining the midpoints of the edges of elements of . We now introduce a local equivalence map as follows (cf. ).
Definition 4.2 Given , we define by the values of at the vertices of the partition .
If P is a central point of E, , then
If P is a midpoint of one edge , , then
If , then
where the sum is taken over all edges with the common vertex P, , .
If , then
where and are the left and right neighbor edges of P, . If P is a vertex of , then .
where , and for any ,; for any , .
where is a piecewise bilinear conforming element harmonic operator, and we have used the minimal energy property of discrete harmonic functions. □
5 Proof of Theorem 3.1
In the proof of Theorem 3.1 we use the abstract framework of ASM methods (see ), we need to prove three assumptions. Assumption II follows from the standard coloring argument, we only need to prove Assumption I and Assumption III.
First we show the following stability of the decomposition.
Lemma 5.1 (Assumption I)
where we have used the fact , . Hence and the equality (5.1) holds.
So (5.4)-(5.6) lead to (5.2). □
Next we state the local stability as follows.
Lemma 5.2 (Assumption III)
Proof To prove (5.8) we first introduce a function associated with a mortar side , which satisfies the following:
for any , ;
for any , ;
for any , satisfies (2.5).
From (5.10)-(5.12), we complete the proof of (5.8).
Using similar techniques to those in (5.8), and summing over all subdomains, we can complete the proof of (5.9). □
6 Numerical results
where . The domain is composed of sub-squares, their mesh sizes are H, and the sub-squares are divided into smaller ones with mesh sizes in mortar subdomains; and in nonmortar subdomains. The coefficient ρ is either 1 or ().
We use the preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) method with zero initial guess for the discrete system of equations. The stopping criterion for the PCG method is when the 2-norm of the residual is reduced by the factor of 10−6 of the initial guess. An estimate for the condition number of the corresponding system is computed by using the Lanczos algorithm.
The number of iterations and condition numbers for
M × M
k = 2
k = 4
k = 6
k = 2
k = 4
k = 6
4 × 4
8 × 8
16 × 16
32 × 32
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11371199 and 11301275), Jiangsu Provincial 2011 Program (Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change), the Program of Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 12KJB110013), the Doctoral fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 20123207120001), and Jiangsu Key Lab for NSLSCS (Grant No. 201306). Moreover the authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions.
- Dohrmann C: A preconditioner for substructuring based on constrained energy minimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2003, 25: 246-258. 10.1137/S1064827502412887MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mandel J, Dohrmann C: Convergence of a balancing domain decomposition by constraints and energy minimization. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2003, 10: 639-659. 10.1002/nla.341MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Widlund O: FETI-DP, BDDC, and block Cholesky methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2006, 66: 250-271. 10.1002/nme.1553MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mandel J, Dohrmann C, Tezaur R: An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints. Appl. Numer. Math. 2005, 54: 167-193. 10.1016/j.apnum.2004.09.022MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim H: A BDDC algorithm for mortar discretization of elasticity problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2008, 46: 2090-2111. 10.1137/060649677MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim H: A FETI-DP formulation of three dimensional elasticity problems with mortar discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2008, 46: 2090-2111. 10.1137/060649677MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Lee C, Park E: A FETI-DP formulation for the Stokes problem without primal pressure component. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2010, 47: 4142-4162. 10.1137/080731876MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Tallec P, Mandel J, Vidrascu M: A Neumann-Neumann domain decomposition algorithm for solving plate and shell problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1998, 35: 836-867. 10.1137/S0036142995291019MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rannacher R, Turek S: Simple nonconforming quadrilateral Stokes element. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 1992, 8: 97-111. 10.1002/num.1690080202MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera A: Domain decomposition by the mortar element method. In Asymptotic and Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations with Critical Parameters. Edited by: Kaper HG, Garbey M, Pieper GW. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1993:269-286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcinkowski L:Additive Schwarz method for mortar discretization of elliptic problems with nonconforming elements. BIT Numer. Math. 2005, 45: 375-394. 10.1007/s10543-005-7123-xMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Chen J, Xu W, Li Z:An additive Schwarz preconditioner for the mortar-type rotated FEM for elliptic problems with discontinuous coefficients. Appl. Numer. Math. 2009, 59: 1657-1667. 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.11.006MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Xu X:The mortar element methods for rotated element. J. Comput. Math. 2002, 20: 313-324.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Xu J: Iterative methods by space decomposition and subspace correction. SIAM Rev. 1992, 34: 581-613. 10.1137/1034116MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu J, Zou J: Some nonoverlapping domain decomposition method. SIAM Rev. 1998, 40: 857-914. 10.1137/S0036144596306800MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toselli A, Widlund O: Domain Decomposition Methods: Algorithms and Theory. Springer, Berlin; 2005.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.