 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Secondorder initial value problems with singularities
Boundary Value Problems volume 2014, Article number: 161 (2014)
Abstract
Using barrier strip arguments, we investigate the existence of C[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]solutions to the initial value problem {x}^{\u2033}=f(t,x,{x}^{\prime}), x(0)=A, {lim}_{t\to {0}^{+}}{x}^{\prime}(t)=B, which may be singular at x=A and {x}^{\prime}=B.
MSC: 34B15, 34B16, 34B18.
1 Introduction
In this paper we study the solvability of initial value problems (IVPs) of the form
Here the scalar function f(t,x,p) is defined on a set of the form ({D}_{t}\times {D}_{x}\times {D}_{p})\mathrm{\setminus}({S}_{A}\cup {S}_{B}), where {D}_{t},{D}_{x},{D}_{p}\subseteq \mathbb{R}, {S}_{A}={\mathcal{T}}_{1}\times \{A\}\times \mathcal{P}, {S}_{B}={\mathcal{T}}_{2}\times \mathcal{X}\times \{B\}, {\mathcal{T}}_{i}\subseteq {D}_{t}, i=1,2, \mathcal{X}\subseteq {D}_{x}, \mathcal{P}\subseteq {D}_{p}, and so it may be singular at x=A and p=B.
IVPs of the form
have been investigated by Rachůnková and Tomeček [1]–[3]. For example in [1], the authors have discussed the set of all solutions to this problem with a singularity at t=0. Here A<0, \phi \in C[0,\mathrm{\infty})\cap {C}^{1}(0,\mathrm{\infty}) with \phi (0)=0, {\phi}^{\prime}(t)>0 for t\in (0,\mathrm{\infty}) and {lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}\frac{{\phi}^{\prime}(t)}{\phi (t)}=0, f is locally Lipschitz on (\mathrm{\infty},L] with the properties f(L)=0 and xf(x)<0 for x\in (\mathrm{\infty},0)\cup (0,L), where L>0 is a suitable constant.
Agarwal and O’Regan [4] have studied the problem
where f(t,x,p) may be singular at x=0 and/or p=0. The obtained results give a positive {C}^{1}[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]solution under the assumptions that \phi \in C[0,T], \phi (t)>0 for t\in (0,T], f:[0,T]\times {(0,\mathrm{\infty})}^{2}\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is continuous and
where g, h, r, and w are suitable functions.
IVPs of the form
where f(t,x,p)\in C((0,1)\times {(0,\mathrm{\infty})}^{2}), maybe singular at t=0, t=1, x=0 or p=0, have been studied by Yang [5], [6]. The solvability in {C}^{1}[0,1] and C[0,1]\cap {C}^{2}(0,1) is established in these works, respectively, under the assumption that
where k, F, and G are suitable functions.
The solvability of various IVPs has been studied also by Bobisud and O’Regan [7], Bobisud and Lee [8], Cabada and Heikkilä [9], Cabada et al. [10], [11], Cid [12], Maagli and Masmoudi [13], and Zhao [14]. Existence results for problem (1.1), (1.2) with a singularity at the initial value of {x}^{\prime} have been reported in KelevedjievPopivanov [15].
Here, as usual, we use regularization and sequential techniques. Namely, we proceed as follows. First, by means of the topological transversality theorem [16], we prove an existence result guaranteeing {C}^{2}[a,T]solutions to the nonsingular IVP for equations of the form (1.1) with boundary conditions
Moreover, we establish the needed a priori bounds by the barrier strips technique. Further, the obtained existence theorem assures {C}^{2}[0,T]solutions for each nonsingular IVP included in the family
where n\in \mathbb{N} is suitable. Finally, we apply the ArzelaAscoli theorem on the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} of {C}^{2}[0,T]solutions thus constructed to (1.3) to extract a uniformly convergent subsequence and show that its limit is a C[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]solution to singular problem (1.1), (1.2). In the case A\ge 0, B\ge 0 we establish C[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]solutions with important properties  monotony and positivity.
We have used variants of the approach described above for various boundary value problems (BVPs); see Grammatikopoulos et al. [17], Kelevedjiev and Popivanov [18] and Palamides et al. [19]. For example in [17], we have established the existence of positive solutions to the BVP
which may be singular at x=0. Note that despite the more general equation of this problem, the conditions imposed here as well as the results obtained are not consequences of those in [17].
2 Topological transversality theorem
In this short section we state our main tools  the topological transversality theorem and a theorem giving an important property of the constant maps.
So, let X be a metric space and Y be a convex subset of a Banach space E. Let U\subset Y be open in Y. The compact map F:\overline{U}\to Y is called admissible if it is fixed point free on ∂U. We denote the set of all such maps by {\mathbf{L}}_{\partial u}(\overline{U},Y).
A map F in {\mathbf{L}}_{\partial u}(\overline{U},Y) is essential if every map G in {\mathbf{L}}_{\partial u}(\overline{U},Y) such that G\partial U=F\partial U has a fixed point in U. It is clear, in particular, every essential map has a fixed point in U.
Theorem 2.1
([16], Chapter I, Theorem 2.2])
Letp\in Ube fixed andF\in {\mathbf{L}}_{\partial u}(\overline{U},Y)be the constant mapF(x)=pforx\in \overline{U}. Then F is essential.
We say that the homotopy\{{\mathrm{H}}_{\lambda}:X\to Y\}, 0\le \lambda \le 1, is compact if the map\mathrm{H}(x,\lambda ):X\times [0,1]\to Ygiven by\mathrm{H}(x,\lambda )\equiv {\mathrm{H}}_{\lambda}(x)for(x,\lambda )\in X\times [0,1]is compact.
Theorem 2.2
([16], Chapter I, Theorem 2.6])
Let Y be a convex subset of a Banach space E andU\subset Ybe open. Suppose:

(i)
F,G:\overline{U}\to Y are compact maps.

(ii)
G\in {\mathbf{L}}_{\partial U}(\overline{U},Y) is essential.

(iii)
\mathrm{H}(x,\lambda ), \lambda \in [0,1], is a compact homotopy joining F and G, i.e.
\mathrm{H}(x,1)=F(x)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{and}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{H}(x,0)=G(x).

(iv)
\mathrm{H}(x,\lambda ), \lambda \in [0,1], is fixed point free on ∂U.
Then\mathrm{H}(x,\lambda ), \lambda \in [0,1], has at least one fixed point in U and in particular there is a{x}_{0}\in Usuch that{x}_{0}=F({x}_{0}).
3 Nonsingular problem
Consider the IVP
where f:{D}_{t}\times {D}_{x}\times {D}_{p}\to \mathbb{R}, {D}_{t},{D}_{x},{D}_{p}\subseteq \mathbb{R}.
We include this problem into the following family of regular IVPs constructed for \lambda \in [0,1]
and suppose the following.

(R)
There exist constants T>a, {m}_{1}, {\overline{m}}_{1}, {M}_{1}, {\overline{M}}_{1}, and a sufficiently small \tau >0 such that
\begin{array}{c}{m}_{1}\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}{\overline{M}}_{1}\tau \ge {M}_{1}\ge B\ge {m}_{1}\ge {\overline{m}}_{1}+\tau ,\hfill \\ [a,T]\subseteq {D}_{t},\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}[A\tau ,{M}_{0}+\tau ]\subseteq {D}_{x},\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}[{\overline{m}}_{1},{\overline{M}}_{1}]\subseteq {D}_{p},\hfill \end{array}
where {M}_{0}=A+{M}_{1}(Ta),
where {D}_{{M}_{0}}={D}_{x}\cap (\mathrm{\infty},{M}_{0}].
Our first result ensures bounds for the eventual {C}^{2}solutions to (3.2). We need them to prepare the application of the topological transversality theorem.
Lemma 3.1
Let (R) hold. Then each solutionx\in {C}^{2}[a,T]to the family (3.2)_{ λ }, \lambda \in [0,1], satisfies the bounds
where
Proof
Suppose that the set
is not empty. Then
imply that there exists an interval [\alpha ,\beta ]\subset {S}_{} such that
This inequality and the continuity of {x}^{\prime}(t) guarantee the existence of some \gamma \in [\alpha ,\beta ] for which
Since x(t), t\in [a,T], is a solution of the differential equation, we have (t,x(t),{x}^{\prime}(t))\in [a,T]\times {D}_{x}\times {D}_{p}. In particular for γ we have
Thus, we apply (R) to conclude that
which contradicts the inequality {x}^{\u2033}(\gamma )>0. This has been established above. Thus, {S}_{} is empty and as a result
Now, by the mean value theorem for each t\in (a,T] there exists a \xi \in (a,t) such that
which yields
This allows us to use (3.3) to show similarly to above that the set
is empty. Hence,
and so
To estimate {x}^{\u2033}(t), we observe firstly that (R) implies in particular
and
which yield {m}_{2}\le 0 and {M}_{2}\ge 0. Multiplying both sides of the inequality \lambda \le 1 by {m}_{2} and {M}_{2}, we get, respectively, {m}_{2}\le \lambda {m}_{2} and \lambda {M}_{2}\le {M}_{2}. On the other hand, we have established
Thus,
and each \lambda \in [0,1] and so
□
Let us mention that some analogous results have been obtained in Kelevedjiev [20]. For completeness of our explanations, we present the full proofs here.
Now we prove an existence result guaranteeing the solvability of IVP (3.1).
Theorem 3.2
Let (R) hold. Then nonsingular problem (3.1) has at least one nondecreasing solution in{C}^{2}[a,T].
Proof
Preparing the application of Theorem 2.2, we define first the set
where {C}_{I}^{2}[a,T]=\{x\in {C}^{2}[a,T]:x(a)=A,{x}^{\prime}(a)=B\}. It is important to notice that according to Lemma 3.1 all {C}^{2}[a,T]solutions to family (3.2) are interior points of U. Further, we introduce the continuous maps
and for t\in [a,T] and x(t)\in j(\overline{U}) the map
Clearly, the map Φ is also continuous since, by assumption, the function f(t,x(t),{x}^{\prime}(t)) is continuous on [a,T] if
In addition we verify that {V}^{1} exists and is also continuous. To this aim we introduce the linear map
defined by Wx={x}^{\u2033}, where {C}_{{I}_{0}}^{2}[a,T]=\{x\in {C}^{2}[a,T]:x(a)=0,{x}^{\prime}(a)=0\}. It is onetoone because each function x\in {C}_{{I}_{0}}^{2}[a,T] has a unique image, and each function y\in C[a,T] has a unique inverse image which is the unique solution to the IVP
It is not hard to see that W is bounded and so, by the bounded inverse theorem, the map {W}^{1} exists and is linear and bounded. Thus, it is continuous. Now, using {W}^{1}, we define
where \ell (t)=B(ta)+A is the unique solution of the problem
Clearly, {V}^{1} is continuous since {W}^{1} is continuous.
We already can introduce a homotopy
defined by
It is well known that j is completely continuous, that is, j maps each bounded subset of {C}_{I}^{2}[a,T] into a compact subset of {C}^{1}[a,T]. Thus, the image j(\overline{U}) of the bounded set U is compact. Now, from the continuity of Φ and {V}^{1} it follows that the sets \mathrm{\Phi}(j(\overline{U})) and {V}^{1}(\mathrm{\Phi}(j(\overline{U}))) are also compact. In summary, we have established that the homotopy is compact. On the other hand, for its fixed points we have
and
which is the operator form of family (3.2). So, each fixed point of {\mathrm{H}}_{\lambda} is a solution to (3.2), which, according to Lemma 3.1, lies in U. Consequently, the homotopy is fixed point free on ∂U.
Finally, {\mathrm{H}}_{0}(x) is a constant map mapping each function x\in \overline{U} to \ell (t). Thus, according to Theorem 2.1, {\mathrm{H}}_{0}(x)=\ell is essential.
So, all assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are fulfilled. Hence {\mathrm{H}}_{1}(x) has a fixed point in U which means that the IVP of (3.2) obtained for \lambda =1 (i.e. (3.1)) has at least one solution x(t) in {C}^{2}[a,T]. From Lemma 3.1 we know that
from which its monotony follows. □
The validity of the following results follows similarly.
Theorem 3.3
LetB>0and let (R) hold for{m}_{1}>0. Then problem (3.1) has at least one strictly increasing solution in{C}^{2}[a,T].
Theorem 3.4
LetA>0 (A=0) and let (R) hold for{m}_{1}=0. Then problem (3.1) has at least one positive (nonnegative) nondecreasing solution in{C}^{2}[a,T].
Theorem 3.5
LetA\ge 0, B>0and let (R) hold for{m}_{1}>0. Then problem (3.1) has at least one strictly increasing solution in{C}^{2}[a,T]with positive values fort\in (a,T].
4 A problem singular at x and {x}^{\prime}
In this section we study the solvability of singular IVP (1.1), (1.2) under the following assumptions.
(S_{1}): There are constants T>0, {m}_{1}, {\overline{m}}_{1} and a sufficiently small \nu >0 such that
where {\tilde{M}}_{0}=A+BT+1,
and
where {D}_{{\tilde{M}}_{0}}=(\mathrm{\infty},{\tilde{M}}_{0}]\cap {D}_{x}.
(S_{2}): For some \alpha \in (0,T] and \mu \in ({m}_{1},B) there exists a constant k<0 such that k\alpha +B>\mu and
where T, {m}_{1} and {\tilde{M}}_{0} are as in (S_{1}).
Now, for n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, where {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}>max\{{\alpha}^{1},{(B+k\alpha \mu )}^{1}\}, and α, μ, and k are as in (S_{2}), we construct the following family of regular IVPs:
Notice, for n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, that we have B{n}^{1}>\mu k\alpha >\mu >{m}_{1}>0.
Lemma 4.1
Let (S_{1}) and (S_{2}) hold and let{x}_{n}\in {C}^{2}[0,T], n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, be a solution to (4.3) such that
Then the following bound is satisfied for eachn\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}:
where {\varphi}_{\alpha}(t)=\{\begin{array}{ll}kt+B,& t\in [0,\alpha ],\\ k\alpha +B,& t\in (\alpha ,T].\end{array}
Proof
Since for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} we have
we will consider the proof for an arbitrary fixed n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, considering two cases. Namely, {x}_{n}^{\prime}(t)>\mu for t\in [0,\alpha ] is the first case and the second one is {x}_{n}^{\prime}(t)>\mu for t\in [0,\beta ) with {x}_{n}^{\prime}(\beta )=\mu for some \beta \in (0,\alpha ].
Case 1. From \mu <{x}_{n}^{\prime}(t)\le B, t\in [0,\alpha ], and (S_{2}) we have
i.e.{x}_{n}^{\u2033}(t)\le k for t\in [0,\alpha ]. Integrating the last inequality from 0 to t we get
which yields
Now {m}_{1}\le {x}_{n}^{\prime}(t)<B, t\in [0,T], and (4.2) imply
In particular {x}_{n}^{\u2033}(t)\le 0 for t\in [\alpha ,T], thus
Case 2. As in the first case, we derive
On the other hand, since {m}_{1}\le {x}_{n}^{\prime}(t)<B for t\in [\beta ,T], again from (4.2) it follows that
which yields
and
So, as a result of the considered cases we get
from which the assertion follows immediately. □
Having this lemma, we prove the basic result of this section.
Theorem 4.2
Let (S_{1}) and (S_{2}) hold. Then singular IVP (1.1), (1.2) has at least one strictly increasing solution inC[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]such that
Proof
For each fixed n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} introduce \tau =min\{{(2n)}^{1},\nu \},
having the properties
and [{\overline{m}}_{1},{\overline{M}}_{1}]\subseteq {D}_{p} since {\overline{M}}_{1}=B{(2n)}^{1}<B. Besides,
and, in view of (4.1),
All this implies that for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} the corresponding IVP of family (4.3) satisfies (R). Thus, we apply Theorem 3.2 to conclude that (4.3) has a solution {x}_{n}\in {C}^{2}[0,T] for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}. We can use also Lemma 3.1 to conclude that for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} and t\in [0,T] we have
and
Now, these bounds allow the application of Lemma 4.1 from which one infers that for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} and t\in [0,T] the bounds
hold. For later use, integrating the least inequality from 0 to t, t\in (0,T], we get
and n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}.
We consider firstly the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} of {C}^{2}[0,T]solutions of (4.3) only for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}. Clearly, for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} we have in particular
which together with (4.6) gives
where {A}_{1}={m}_{1}\alpha +A. On combining the last inequality and (4.4) we obtain
From (4.5) we have in addition
Now, using the fact that (4.1) implies continuity of f(t,x,p) on the compact set [\alpha ,T]\times [{A}_{1},{\tilde{M}}_{0}]\times [{m}_{1},{\varphi}_{\alpha}(\alpha )] and keeping in mind that for each n\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}
we conclude that there is a constant {M}_{2}, independent of n, such that
Using the obtained a priori bounds for {x}_{n}(t), {x}_{n}^{\prime}(t) and {x}_{n}^{\u2033}(t) on the interval [\alpha ,T], we apply the ArzelaAscoli theorem to conclude that there exists a subsequence \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\}, k\in \mathbb{N}, {n}_{k}\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, of \{{x}_{n}\} and a function {x}_{\alpha}\in {C}^{1}[\alpha ,T] such that
i.e., the sequences \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\} and \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}^{\prime}\} converge uniformly on the interval [\alpha ,T] to {x}_{\alpha} and {x}_{\alpha}^{\prime}, respectively. Obviously, (4.7) and (4.8) are valid in particular for the elements of \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\} and \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}^{\prime}\}, respectively, from which, letting k\to \mathrm{\infty}, one finds
Clearly, the functions {x}_{{n}_{k}}(t), k\in \mathbb{N}, {n}_{k}\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu}, satisfy integral equations of the form
Now, since f(t,x,p) is uniformly continuous on the compact set [\alpha ,T]\times [{A}_{1},{\tilde{M}}_{0}]\times [{m}_{1},{\varphi}_{\alpha}(\alpha )], from the uniform convergence of \{{x}_{{n}_{k}}\} it follows that the sequence \{f(s,{x}_{{n}_{k}}(s),{x}_{{n}_{k}}^{\prime}(s))\}, {n}_{k}\ge {n}_{\alpha ,\mu} is uniformly convergent on [\alpha ,T] to the function f(s,{x}_{\alpha}(s),{x}_{\alpha}^{\prime}(s)), which means
for each t\in (\alpha ,T]. Returning to the integral equation and letting k\to \mathrm{\infty} yield
which implies that {x}_{\alpha}(t) is a {C}^{2}(\alpha ,T]solution to the differential equation {x}^{\u2033}=f(t,x,{x}^{\prime}) on (\alpha ,T]. Besides, (4.6) implies
Further, we observe that if the condition (S_{2}) holds for some \alpha >0, then it is true also for an arbitrary {\alpha}_{0}\in (0,\alpha ). We will use this fact considering a sequence \{{\alpha}_{i}\}\subset (0,\alpha ), i\in \mathbb{N}, with the properties
For each i\in \mathbb{N} we consider sequences
on the interval [{\alpha}_{i+1},T]. Thus, we establish that each sequence \{{x}_{i,{n}_{k}}\} has a subsequence \{{x}_{i+1,{n}_{k}}\}, k\in \mathbb{N}, {n}_{k}\ge {n}_{i+1,\mu}, converging uniformly on the interval [{\alpha}_{i+1},T] to any function {x}_{{\alpha}_{i+1}}(t), t\in [{\alpha}_{i+1},T], that is,
which is a {C}^{2}({\alpha}_{i+1},T]solution to the differential equation {x}^{\u2033}(t)=f(t,x(t),{x}^{\prime}(t)) on ({\alpha}_{i+1},T] and
The properties of the functions from \{{x}_{{\alpha}_{i}}\}, i\in \mathbb{N}, imply that there exists a function {x}_{0}(t) which is a {C}^{2}(0,T]solution to the equation {x}^{\u2033}=f(t,x,{x}^{\prime}) on the interval (0,T] and is such that
hence {lim}_{t\to {0}^{+}}{x}_{0}(t)=A,
We have to show also that
Reasoning by contradiction, assume that there exists a sufficiently small \epsilon >0 such that for every \delta >0 there is a t\in (0,\delta ) such that
In other words, assume that for every sequence \{{\delta}_{j}\}\subset (0,T], j\in \mathbb{N}, with {lim}_{j\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\delta}_{j}=0, there exists a sequence \{{t}_{j}\} having the properties {t}_{j}\in (0,{\delta}_{j}), {lim}_{j\to \mathrm{\infty}}{t}_{j}=0 and
It is clear that every interval (0,{\delta}_{j}), j\in \mathbb{N}, contains a subsequence of \{{t}_{j}\} converging to 0. Besides, from (4.9) and (4.10) it follows that for every j\in \mathbb{N} there are {i}_{j},{n}_{j}\in \mathbb{N} such that {\alpha}_{{i}_{j}}<{\delta}_{j} and
for all i>{i}_{j} and all {n}_{k}\ge max\{{n}_{i,\mu},{n}_{j}\}. Moreover, since the accumulation point of \{{t}_{j}\} is 0, for each sufficiently large j\in \mathbb{N} there is a {t}_{j}\in [{\alpha}_{i},{\delta}_{j}) where i>{i}_{j}. In summary, for every sufficiently large j\in \mathbb{N}, that is, for every sufficiently small {\delta}_{j}>0, there are {i}_{j},{n}_{j}\in \mathbb{N} such that for all i>{i}_{j} and {n}_{k}\ge max\{{n}_{i,\mu},{n}_{j}\} from (4.12) and (4.13) we have
which contradicts to the fact that {x}_{i,{n}_{k}}^{\prime}(0)=B{n}_{k}^{1} and {x}_{i,{n}_{k}}^{\prime}\in C[0,T]. This contradiction proves that (4.11) is true.
Now, it is easy to verify that the function
is a C[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]solution to (1.1), (1.2). This function is strictly increasing because {x}^{\prime}(t)={x}_{0}^{\prime}(t)\ge {m}_{1}>0 for t\in (0,T], and the bounds for x(t) and {x}^{\prime}(t) follows immediately from the corresponding bounds for {x}_{0}(t) and {x}_{0}^{\prime}(t). □
The following results provide information about the presence of other useful properties of the assured solutions. Their correctness follows directly from Theorem 4.2.
Theorem 4.3
LetA\ge 0and let (S_{1}) and (S_{2}) hold. Then the singular IVP (1.1), (1.2) has at least one strictly increasing solution inC[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T]with positive values fort\in (0,T].
5 Examples
Example 5.1
Consider the IVP
where b,c\in (0,\mathrm{\infty}), and the polynomial {P}_{k}(p), k\ge 2, has simple zeroes {p}_{1} and {p}_{2} such that
Let us note that here {D}_{t}=(c,c), {D}_{x}=[b,b] and {D}_{p}=\mathbb{R}.
Clearly, there is a sufficiently small \theta >0 such that
and {P}_{k}(p)\ne 0 for p\in [{p}_{1}\theta ,{p}_{1})\cup ({p}_{1},{p}_{1}+\theta ]\cup [{p}_{2}\theta ,{p}_{2})\cup ({p}_{2},{p}_{2}+\theta ].
We will show that all assumptions of Theorem 3.2 are fulfilled in the case
the other cases as regards the sign of {P}_{k}(p) around {p}_{1} and {p}_{2} may be treated similarly. For this case choose \tau =\theta /2, {m}_{1}={p}_{1}>0 and {M}_{1}={p}_{2}. Next, using the requirement [A\tau ,{M}_{0}+\tau ]\subseteq [b,b], i.e.[\theta /2,{p}_{2}{T}_{0}+\theta /2]\subseteq [b,b], we get the following conditions for θ and T:
which yield \theta \in (0,2b] and T\le \frac{2b\theta}{2{p}_{2}}. Besides, [0,T]\subseteq (c,c) yields T<C. Thus, 0<T<min\{c,\frac{2b\theta}{2{p}_{2}}\}. Now, choosing
we really can apply Theorem 3.2 to conclude that the considered problem has a strictly increasing solution x\in {C}^{2}[0,T] with x(t)>0 on t\in (0,T] for each T<min\{c,\frac{2b\theta}{2{p}_{2}}\}.
Example 5.2
Consider the IVP
Notice that here
It is easy to check that (S_{1}) holds, for example, for {\overline{m}}_{1}=4, {m}_{1}=5, \nu =0.1, and an arbitrary fixed T>0, moreover, {\tilde{M}}_{0}=10T+3. Besides, for k=24/{(10T+1)}^{2}, \alpha =T/100 and \mu =9, for example, we have
and f(t,x,p)\le 24/{(10T+1)}^{2} on [0,T/100]\times (2,10T+3]\times [9,10), which means that (S_{2}) also holds. By Theorem 4.3, the considered IVP has at least one positive strictly increasing solution in C[0,T]\cap {C}^{2}(0,T].
References
Rachůnková I, Tomeček J: Bubbletype solutions of nonlinear singular problem. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 51: 658669. 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.10.042
Rachůnková I, Tomeček J: Homoclinic solutions of singular nonautonomous secondorder differential equations. Bound. Value Probl. 2009., 2009:
Rachůnková I, Tomeček J: Strictly increasing solutions of a nonlinear singular differential equation arising in hydrodynamics. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72: 21142118. 10.1016/j.na.2009.10.011
Agarwal RP, O’Regan D: Secondorder initial value problems of singular type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 229: 441451. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.6169
Yang G: Minimal positive solutions to some singular secondorder differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 266: 479491. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7748
Yang G: Positive solutions of some secondorder nonlinear singular differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2003, 45: 605614. 10.1016/S08981221(03)000208
Bobisud LE, O’Regan D: Existence of solutions to some singular initial value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1988, 133: 215230. 10.1016/0022247X(88)903769
Bobisud LE, Lee YS: Existence of monotone or positive solutions of singular secondorder sublinear differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1991, 159: 449468. 10.1016/0022247X(91)90207G
Cabada A, Heikkilä S: Extremality results for discontinuous explicit and implicit diffusion problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 143: 6980. 10.1016/S03770427(01)005015
Cabada A, Cid JA, Pouso RL: Positive solutions for a class of singular differential equations arising in diffusion processes. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst., Ser. A Math. Anal. 2005, 12: 329342.
Cabada A, Nieto JJ, Pouso RL: Approximate solutions to a new class of nonlinear diffusion problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1999, 108: 219231. 10.1016/S03770427(99)001120
Cid JA: Extremal positive solutions for a class of singular and discontinuous second order problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2002, 51: 10551072. 10.1016/S0362546X(01)008793
Maagli H, Masmoudi S: Existence theorem of nonlinear singular boundary value problem. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 46: 465473. 10.1016/S0362546X(99)004551
Zhao Z: Positive solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1994, 121: 465469. 10.1090/S00029939199411852765
Kelevedjiev, P, Popivanov, N: On the solvability of a secondorder initial value problem. Paper presented at the 40th international conference on the applications of mathematics in engineering and economics, Technical University of Sofia, Sozopol, 813 June 2014
Granas A, Guenther RB, Lee JW: Nonlinear boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations. Diss. Math. 1985, 244: 1128.
Grammatikopoulos MK, Kelevedjiev PS, Popivanov N:On the solvability of a singular boundaryvalue problem for the equation f(t,x,{x}^{\prime},{x}^{\u2033})=0. J. Math. Sci. 2008, 149: 15041516. 10.1007/s109580080079z
Kelevedjiev P, Popivanov N: Second order boundary value problems with nonlinear twopoint boundary conditions. Georgian Math. J. 2000, 7: 677688.
Palamides P, Kelevedjiev P, Popivanov N:On the solvability of a Neumann boundary value problem for the differential equation f(t,x,{x}^{\prime},{x}^{\u2033})=0. Bound. Value Probl. 2012., 2012: 10.1186/16872770201277
Kelevedjiev P: Positive solutions of nonsingular and singular second order initial value problems. Int. Electron. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2010, 2: 117127.
Acknowledgements
The work is partially supported by the Sofia University Grant 158/2013 and by the Bulgarian NSF under Grant DCVP  02/1/2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kelevedjiev, P., Popivanov, N. Secondorder initial value problems with singularities. Bound Value Probl 2014, 161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s136610140161z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s136610140161z