- Research
- Open Access
- Published:

# Periodic oscillation in suspension bridge model with a periodic damping term

*Boundary Value Problems*
**volume 2014**, Article number: 231 (2014)

## Abstract

We study periodic solutions of the suspension bridge model proposed by Lazer and McKenna with a periodic damping term. Under the Dolph-type condition and a small periodic damping term condition, the existence and the uniqueness of a periodic solution have been proved by a constructive method. Two numerical examples are presented to illustrate the effect of the periodic damping term.

**MSC:** 34B15, 34C15, 34C25.

## 1 Introduction

Many people pay close attention to oscillations in suspension bridges after the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows suspension bridge. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Lazer and McKenna [1]–[3] have studied the suspension bridge model

where U=U(x,t), 0\le x\le L, t>0 satisfies the boundary conditions

c>0, k\ge 0, d\ge 0 are constant, {U}^{+}=max\{U,0\} and {U}^{-}=max\{-U,0\}. System (1)-(2) describes the transverse vibrations of a beam hinged at both ends with length *L* and external force h(t,x). The term d{U}^{+} takes into account the fact that the cables’ restoring force exists only in the situation of stretching. Here k{U}_{t} represents the damping term.

In this paper, we consider problem (1) with 2*π*-periodic damping term p(t)

where h(t,x)=(sin\pi x/L)f(t) is the 2*π*-periodic external force as same as the assumption in [2]. Looking for a standing-wave solution of (3) and (2), we have

which leads to an equivalent ordinary differential equation

in which a=c{(\pi /L)}^{4} and b=d+c{(\pi /L)}^{4}.

In the past years, the jumping nonlinearity has been discussed by many authors [1]–[9]. However, to our knowledge, there is no result about periodic damping term. In the early 1990s, Li [10] obtained an ingenious method to discuss the existence and uniqueness of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems with variable coefficient. Recently, the second author of this paper extended this method to the periodic situation [11]. In this paper we refine this method to solve problem (4) and take some numerical simulations to illustrate the effect of periodic damping term.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly state the main results. In Section 3, we study the properties of the homogeneous equation by a constructive method. In Section 4, we prove our main results by Leray-Schauder degree theory. In Section 5, we present some numerical experiments. In Section 6, we give the conclusion.

## 2 Main results

We denote by *N* a positive integer and \gamma ={sup}_{\mathbb{R}}|p(t)|. To study the existence of periodic solutions of (4), we need the following assumptions:

(H_{1}): Dolph-type condition:

(H_{2}): Small periodic damping term condition:

### Theorem 1

*Let* (H_{1}) *and* (H_{2}) *hold*. *Then problem* (4) *has a unique* 2*π*-*periodic solution*.

The more general form of the suspension bridge model is

Here b(t) and a(t) are positive 2*π*-periodic functions satisfying

where d(t) is the variational coefficient of cables’ restoring force. Denote {\alpha}_{1}={inf}_{\mathbb{R}}(b(t)), {\beta}_{1}={sup}_{\mathbb{R}}(b(t)), {\alpha}_{2}={inf}_{\mathbb{R}}(a(t)), {\beta}_{2}={sup}_{\mathbb{R}}(a(t)). Then

To study the existence of periodic solutions of (5), we make the following assumptions:

(H_{3}): Dolph-type condition:

(H_{4}): Small periodic damping term condition:

### Theorem 2

*Let* (H_{3}) *and* (H_{4}) *hold*. *Then problem* (5) *has a unique* 2*π*-*periodic solution*.

### Remark 1

Problem (4) with (H_{1}) and (H_{2}) is a particular case of problem (5) with (H_{3}) and (H_{4}). So we shall only give the proof of Theorem 2.

## 3 Homogeneous equation

The following lemmas will be used in this section.

### Lemma 3

(see [12])

*Let*x\in {C}^{1}([0,h],\mathbb{R}), h>0, *with*

*Then*

*and the constant*\frac{h}{4}*is optimal*.

### Lemma 4

(see [12])

*Let*x\in {C}^{1}([a,b],\mathbb{R})a,b\in \mathbb{R}, a<b, *with the boundary value conditions*x(a)=x(b)=0. *Then*

Consider the periodic boundary value problem

We will prove the following proposition by similar methods to [11].

### Proposition 5

*Suppose that*p(t), b(t), a(t)*are*{L}^{2}-*integrable* 2*π*-*periodic functions satisfying* (6), (H_{3}) *and* (H_{4}), *then* (7) *has only the trivial* 2*π*-*periodic solution*u(t)\equiv 0.

### Proof

We assume that (7) has a nonzero 2*π*-periodic solution u(t). A contradiction will be proved in six steps.

Step 1. We will prove that u(t) has at least one zero in (0,2\pi ). Otherwise, we may we assume u(t)>0, t\in (0,2\pi ). Then we have {u}^{\u2033}+p(t){u}^{\prime}+b(t){u}^{+}=0 in (0,2\pi ). Consider the following equivalent equation:

where {t}_{0}\in [0,2\pi ] is undetermined. By Rolle’s theorem, there exists a {t}_{0}^{\prime}\in (0,2\pi ) with {u}^{\prime}({t}_{0}^{\prime})=0={u}^{\prime}({t}_{0}^{\prime}+2\pi ). Then

which leads to a contradiction.

Without loss of generality, we assume u(0)=u(2\pi )=0, {u}^{\prime}(0)={u}^{\prime}(2\pi )=A>0.

Step 2. We construct two auxiliary equations. Consider the initial value problem

The first auxiliary equation is

Obviously,

is the solution of (8) and

where \theta \in (0,\frac{\pi}{2}] with sin\theta =\sqrt{\frac{4{\alpha}_{1}-{\gamma}^{2}}{4{\alpha}_{1}}}. Since

holds under the assumptions of (H_{3}), there is a {t}_{0}\in (0,\pi ) such that

Thus, we have

Since \frac{\pi}{2}<\frac{\pi \sqrt{4{\alpha}_{1}-{\gamma}^{2}}}{4N}<\pi and sin*t* is decreasing in [\frac{\pi}{2},\pi ), we have

By (H_{4}), we have

and 0<{t}_{0}<\frac{\pi}{2N}. Therefore

We also consider the initial value problem

Clearly,

is the solution of (13), where *θ* is the same as the previous one, and

Hence there exists a {t}_{1}\in (0,2\pi ) with {t}_{1}-{t}_{0}\in (0,\pi ), such that

Then \psi ({t}_{1})=0. From (10) and (14), it follows that

Since sin*t* is decreasing on [\frac{\pi}{2},\pi ), we have 0<{t}_{1}<\frac{\pi}{N}, and

Step 3. We will prove that u(t) has a zero point in (0,{t}_{1}]. Assume, on the contrary, u(t)>0 for t\in (0,{t}_{1}].

Let y={\phi}^{\prime}(t)u(t)-\phi (t){u}^{\prime}(t) on [0,{t}_{0}]. Since {\phi}^{\prime}(t)\ge 0, \phi (t)>0, u(t)>0 on t\in (0,{t}_{0}], we have

which implies

Notice that y(0)={\phi}^{\prime}(0)u(0)-\phi (0){u}^{\prime}(0)=0, we have

By (12), we know that {u}^{\prime}({t}_{0})\le 0.

Let z={\psi}^{\prime}(t)u(t)-\psi (t){u}^{\prime}(t) on [{t}_{0},{t}_{1}]. Since \psi ({t}_{0})>0, {\psi}^{\prime}({t}_{0})=0, we have

Since {\psi}^{\prime}(t)\le 0, \psi (t)\ge 0, u(t)>0 on [{t}_{0},{t}_{1}], we have

which implies

*i.e.*,

But \psi ({t}_{1})=0 and {\psi}^{\prime}({t}_{1})<0 imply that

which is a contradiction to u(t)>0 on (0,{t}_{1}]. Therefore u(t) has at least one zero in (0,{t}_{1}] with {t}_{1}<\frac{\pi}{N}.

Step 4. We will prove that u(t) has at least 2N+2 zeros on [0,2\pi ]. Let u({t}^{1}) be the first zero point in (0,{t}_{1}] such that u({t}^{1})=0, {u}^{\prime}({t}^{1})=B<0. We claim that there must exist a zero point in ({t}^{1},2\pi ]. Otherwise, we consider {u}^{\u2033}+p(t){u}^{\prime}-a(t){u}^{-}=0. With a similar argument to Step 3, we have a {t}_{2} such that there must be a zero in ({t}^{1},{t}_{2}] and {t}_{2}-{t}^{1}<\frac{\pi}{N}. Step by step, we find that u(t) has at least 2N+2 zeros on [0,2\pi ].

Step 5. We will prove that u(t) has at least 2N+3 zeros on [0,2\pi ]. On the contrary, we assume u(t) has exactly 2N+2 zeros on [0,2\pi ]. We write them as

Obviously,

Without loss of generality, we may assume {u}^{\prime}({t}^{0})>0. Since

we obtain {u}^{\prime}({t}^{2N+1})<0, which contradicts {u}^{\prime}({t}^{2N+1})={u}^{\prime}({t}^{0})>0. Therefore u(t) has at least 2N+3 zeros on [0,2\pi ].

Step 6. Since u(t) has at least 2N+3 zeros on [0,2\pi ], there are two zeros {\xi}_{1} and {\xi}_{2} with 0<{\xi}_{2}-{\xi}_{1}\le \frac{\pi}{N+1}. Integrating {u}^{\prime 2} from {\xi}_{1} to {\xi}_{2}, we have

Assume that there are *k* zeros in ({\xi}_{1},{\xi}_{2}) denoted by {\tau}_{k}, k\in \mathbb{N}. By Lemma 3,

By Lemma 4, we have

Since {\beta}_{1}+\frac{(N+1)\pi \gamma}{4}<{(N+1)}^{2}, we have

Hence

which implies {u}^{\prime}(t)=0 for t\in [{\xi}_{1},{\xi}_{2}]. Due to the uniqueness of the solution for the initial value problem, we get u(t)\equiv 0 for t\in [0,2\pi ], a contradiction. □

## 4 Non-homogeneous equation

In this section, we will give the complete proof of Theorem 2.

### 4.1 Uniqueness

#### Proof

Let {u}_{1} and {u}_{2} be two 2*π*-periodic solutions of (5). Denote v={u}_{1}-{u}_{2}, then *v* is a solution of the following problem:

where d(t) is defined in (6). Since

there exists a \theta \in (0,1) such that

Then (18) equals

If 0<\theta \le \frac{1}{2},

Equation (18) satisfies (H_{3}) and (H_{4}). Otherwise, −*v* as a solution satisfies (H_{3}) and (H_{4}). By Proposition 5, we have v\equiv 0. □

### 4.2 Boundedness

We consider the homotopy equation

where \lambda \in [0,1]. Denote by \parallel \cdot \parallel the usual normal in {C}^{1}[0,2\pi ], *i.e.*, \parallel u\parallel =|u|+|{u}^{\prime}|. We assert there exists B>0 such that every possible periodic solution u(t) of (19) satisfies \parallel u\parallel \le B. If not, there exists {\lambda}_{k}\to {\lambda}_{0} and the solution {u}_{k}(t) with \parallel {u}_{k}\parallel \to \mathrm{\infty} (k\to \mathrm{\infty}). Let {y}_{k}=\frac{{u}_{k}}{\parallel {u}_{k}\parallel}, we have {y}_{k}^{+}=\frac{{u}_{k}^{+}}{\parallel {u}_{k}\parallel} and {y}_{k}^{-}=\frac{{u}_{k}^{-}}{\parallel {u}_{k}\parallel}. Obviously, \parallel {y}_{k}\parallel =1 (k=1,2,\dots). It satisfies the following problem:

in which we have

Since

\{{y}_{k}\}, \{{y}_{k}^{\prime}\} are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. By the Ascoli lemma, there exists a continuous function w(t), v(t), and a subsequence of {\{k\}}_{k=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}} (denote it again by {\{k\}}_{k=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}) such that

As a consequence (20) weakly converges to the following equation in {L}^{2}[0,2\pi ]:

which satisfy (H_{3}) and (H_{4}). By Proposition 5, we have w(t)\equiv 0 for t\in [0,2\pi ], which contradicts \parallel w\parallel =1. Thus, the possible periodic solution is bounded.

### 4.3 Existence

#### Proof

Assume \mathrm{\Phi}(t) is the fundamental solution matrix of {u}^{\u2033}+{\alpha}_{2}u=0 with \mathrm{\Phi}(0)=I. Obviously, it is nonresonant by (H_{3}). Equation (19) can be transformed into the integral equation

Because u(t) is a 2*π*-periodic solution of (22), then

Obviously, (I-\mathrm{\Phi}(2\pi )) is invertible,

Define an operator

such that

Since the right-hand side of {P}_{\lambda} is continuous (non-smooth), it is easy to see that {P}_{\lambda} is a completely continuous operator in {C}^{1}[0,2\pi ]\times C[0,2\pi ]. Denote

and

Because 0\notin {h}_{\lambda}(\partial \mathrm{\Omega}) for \lambda \in [0,1], by Leray-Schauder degree theory, we have

So we conclude that {P}_{1} has at least one fixed point in Ω, that is, (5) has a unique solution. □

## 5 Numerical experiment

### 5.1 Example 1

Let us consider

By Theorem 2, there is a unique 2*π*-periodic solution.

In Figure 1, we make a 10-fold Newton iteration to get an approximate solution of (27), displayed by a blue line. It is obvious that the solution here is locally stable and unique. The error here is about 10^{−10}. The red line in Figure 1 is the approximate solution of (27) without periodic damping term. Our simulation illustrates that the effect of the small periodic damping term is limited.

In Figure 2, we consider the effect of the cables’ restoring force d(t). If there is no cables’ restoring force, we have the following system:

The blue line in Figure 2 is the approximate solution of (27) and the red line in Figure 2 is the approximate solution of (28). The latter one is a particular case that can be tackled by [11].

### 5.2 Example 2

Let us consider

By Theorem 1, there is a unique 2*π*-periodic solution.

The blue line in Figure 3 is the approximate solution of (29). The red line in Figure 3 is the approximate solution of (29) without periodic damping term. Our simulation illustrates that the effect of the small periodic damping term is limited. The method we applied is a 10-fold Newton iteration and the error here is about 10^{−10}.

In Figure 4, we consider the effect of the cables’ restoring force d(t). If there is no cables’ restoring force, we have the following system:

The blue line in Figure 4 is the approximate solution of (29) and the red line in Figure 4 is the approximate solution of (30).

## 6 Conclusions

Periodic solutions of the suspension bridge model with a periodic damping term have been studied. After transforming this system into an equivalent ordinary differential equation, we get the existence and the uniqueness of a periodic solution by the Dolph-type condition and a small periodic damping term condition. Our constructive method is very adaptable to this kind of non-smooth problem. Two numerical examples have been presented to simulate our main results. By the numerical experiment, we know that the effect of the small periodic damping term is limited. Furthermore, we compare the approximate solution of our system to the suspension bridge model without the cables’ restoring force, the latter one is a particular case of [11].

## References

Lazer AC, McKenna PJ: Large scale oscillatory behaviour in loaded asymmetric systems.

*Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire*1987, 4: 243-274.Lazer AC, McKenna PJ: Existence, uniqueness, and stability of oscillations in differential equations with asymmetric nonlinearities.

*Trans. Am. Math. Soc.*1989, 315: 721-739. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1989-0979963-1Lazer AC, McKenna PJ: Large-amplitude periodic oscillations in suspension bridges: some new connections with nonlinear analysis.

*SIAM Rev.*1990, 32: 537-578. 10.1137/1032120Dancer EN: On the Dirichlet problem for weakly non-linear elliptic partial differential equations.

*Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A*1976/77, 76: 283-300.Agarwal RP, Perera K, O’Regan D: A variational approach to singular quasilinear elliptic problems with sign changing nonlinearities.

*Appl. Anal.*2006, 85: 1201-1206. 10.1080/00036810500474655Ding ZH: Traveling waves in a suspension bridge system.

*SIAM J. Math. Anal.*2003, 35: 160-171. 10.1137/S0036141002412690Fabry C: Large-amplitude oscillations of a nonlinear asymmetric oscillator with damping.

*Nonlinear Anal. TMA*2001, 44: 613-626. 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00295-3Fučík S: Boundary value problems with jumping nonlinearities.

*Čas. Pěst. Mat.*1976, 101: 69-87.Li X, Zhang ZH: Unbounded solutions and periodic solutions for second order differential equations with asymmetric nonlinearity.

*Proc. Am. Math. Soc.*2007, 135: 2769-2777. 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08928-9Li Y: Boundary value problems for nonlinear ordinary differential equations.

*Northeast. Math. J.*1990, 6: 297-302.Zu J: Existence and uniqueness of periodic solution for nonlinear second-order ordinary differential equations.

*Bound. Value Probl.*2011., 2011: 10.1155/2011/192156Mitrinović DS:

*Analytic Inequalities*. Springer, Berlin; 1970.

## Acknowledgements

The authors express deep gratitude to the anonymous referees for their useful suggestions and comments, especially for pointing out the flaws in Step 3 of Section 3. The authors also thank Professor Yong Li for his useful discussion.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Wang, L., Zu, J. Periodic oscillation in suspension bridge model with a periodic damping term.
*Bound Value Probl* **2014**, 231 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0231-2

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0231-2

### Keywords

- periodic damping term
- suspension bridge model
- jumping nonlinearity
- Leray-Schauder degree