Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

A note on the boundary behavior for a modified Green function in the upper-half space

Boundary Value Problems20152015:114

  • Received: 13 April 2015
  • Accepted: 28 May 2015
  • Published:


Motivated by (Xu et al. in Bound. Value Probl. 2013:262, 2013) and (Yang and Ren in Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 124(2):175-178, 2014), in this paper we aim to construct a modified Green function in the upper-half space of the n-dimensional Euclidean space, which generalizes the boundary property of general Green potential.


  • modified Green function
  • capacity
  • upper-half space

1 Introduction and main results

Let \({\mathbf{R}}^{n}\) (\(n\geq2\)) denote the n-dimensional Euclidean space. The upper half-space H is the set \(H=\{x=(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\in{\mathbf{R}}^{n}: x_{n}>0\}\), whose boundary and closure are ∂H and \(\overline{H}\) respectively.

For \(x\in{\mathbf{R}}^{n}\) and \(r>0\), let \(B(x,r)\) denote the open ball with center at x and radius r.

$$E_{\alpha}(x)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} -\log|x| & \mbox{if } \alpha=n=2, \\ |x|^{\alpha-n} & \mbox{if } 0< \alpha< n. \end{array}\displaystyle \displaystyle \displaystyle \right . $$
Let \(G_{\alpha}\) be the Green function of order α for H, that is,
$$G_{\alpha}(x,y)=E_{\alpha}(x-y)-E_{\alpha}\bigl(x-y^{\ast}\bigr),\quad x,y\in\overline {H} , x\neq y, 0< \alpha\leq n, $$
where denotes reflection in the boundary plane ∂H just as \(y^{\ast}=(y_{1},y_{2},\ldots,-y_{n})\).
In case \(\alpha=n=2\), we consider the modified kernel function, which is defined by
$$E_{n,m}(x-y)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} E_{n}(x-y) & \mbox{if } |y|< 1, \\ E_{n}(x-y) +\Re (\log y- \sum_{k=1}^{m-1}(\frac{x^{k} }{k y^{k} }) ) & \mbox{if } |y|\geq1. \end{array}\displaystyle \displaystyle \right . $$
In case \(0<\alpha<n\), we define
$$E_{\alpha,m}(x-y)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} E_{\alpha}(x-y) & \mbox{if } |y|< 1, \\ E_{\alpha}(x-y) -\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}\frac{|x|^{k}}{|y|^{n-\alpha+k}}C^{\frac {n-\alpha}{2}}_{k} ( \frac{x\cdot y}{|x||y|} ) & \mbox{if } |y|\geq1, \end{array}\displaystyle \displaystyle \right . $$
where m is a non-negative integer, \(C^{\omega}_{k}(t)\) (\(\omega=\frac{n-\alpha}{2}\)) is the ultraspherical (or Gegenbauer) polynomial (see [1]). The expression arises from the generating function for Gegenbauer polynomials
$$ \bigl(1-2tr+r^{2}\bigr)^{-\omega} = \sum _{k=0}^{\infty} C_{k}^{\omega}(t)r^{k}, $$
where \(|r|<1\), \(|t|\leq1\) and \(\omega>0\). The coefficient \(C^{\omega}_{k}(t) \) is called the ultraspherical (or Gegenbauer) polynomial of degree k associated with ω, the function \(C^{\omega}_{k}(t) \) is a polynomial of degree k in t.
Then we define the modified Green function \(G_{\alpha,m}(x,y)\) by
$$G_{\alpha,m}(x,y)=\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} E_{n,m+1}(x-y)-E_{n,m+1}(x-y^{\ast}) & \mbox{if } \alpha=n=2, \\ E_{\alpha,m+1}(x-y)-E_{\alpha,m+1}(x-y^{\ast}) & \mbox{if } 0< \alpha< n, \end{array}\displaystyle \displaystyle \displaystyle \right . $$
where \(x, y\in\overline{H}\) and \(x\neq y\). We remark that this modified Green function is also used to give unique solutions of the Neumann and Dirichlet problem in the upper-half space [24].
$$G_{\alpha,m}(x,\mu)=\int_{H} G_{\alpha,m}(x,y) \, d \mu(y), $$
where μ is a non-negative measure on H. Here note that \(G_{2,0}(x,\mu)\) is nothing but the general Green potential.
Let k be a non-negative Borel measurable function on \({\mathbf{R}}^{n}\times{\mathbf{R}}^{n}\), and set
$$k(y,\mu)=\int_{E}k(y,x) \, d\mu(x)\quad \mbox{and}\quad k( \mu,x)=\int_{E}k(y,x) \, d\mu(y) $$
for a non-negative measure μ on a Borel set \(E\subset{\mathbf{R}}^{n}\). We define a capacity \(C_{k}\) by
$$C_{k}(E)=\sup\mu\bigl({\mathbf{R}}^{n}\bigr), \quad E \subset H, $$
where the supremum is taken over all non-negative measures μ such that \(S_{\mu}\) (the support of μ) is contained in E and \(k(y,\mu) \leq1\) for every \(y\in H\).
For \(\beta\leq0\), \(\delta\leq0\) and \(\beta\leq\delta\), we consider the kernel function
$$k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta}(y,x)=x_{n}^{-\beta}y_{n}^{-\delta}G_{\alpha}(x,y). $$

Now we prove the following result. For related results in a smooth cone and tube, we refer the reader to the papers by Qiao (see [5, 6]) and Liao-Su (see [7]), respectively. The readers may also find some related interesting results with respect to the Schrödinger operator in the papers by Su (see [8]), by Polidoro and Ragusa (see [9]) and the references therein.


Let \(n+m-\alpha+\delta+2\geq0\). If μ is a non-negative measure on H satisfying
$$ \int_{H} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y)< \infty, $$
then there exists a Borel set \(E\subset H\) with properties:
$$\begin{aligned} (1)&\quad \lim_{x_{n} \rightarrow0, x \in H-E} \frac{x_{n}^{n-\alpha-\beta+\delta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}} G_{\alpha,m}(x, \mu)=0; \\ (2)&\quad \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}2^{i(n-\alpha+\beta+\delta)}C_{k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta }}(E_{i})< \infty, \end{aligned}$$
where \(E_{i}=\{x\in E: 2^{-i}\leq x_{n}<2^{-i+1}\}\).


By using Lemma 4 below, condition (2) in Theorem with \(\alpha=2\), \(\beta=0\), \(\delta=0\) means that E is 2-thin at ∂H in the sense of [10].

2 Some lemmas

Throughout this paper, let M denote various constants independent of the variables in questions, which may be different from line to line.

Lemma 1

There exists a positive constant M such that \(G_{\alpha}(x,y)\leq M\frac{x_{n}y_{n}}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha+2}}\), where \(0<\alpha\leq n\), \(x=(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) and \(y=(y_{1},y_{2},\ldots, y_{n})\) in H.

This can be proved by a simple calculation.

Lemma 2

Gegenbauer polynomials have the following properties:
  1. (1)

    \(|C_{k}^{\omega}(t)|\leq C_{k}^{\omega}(1)=\frac{\Gamma(2\omega +k)}{\Gamma(2\omega)\Gamma(k+1)}\), \(|t|\leq1 \);

  2. (2)

    \(\frac{d}{dt}C_{k}^{\omega}(t)=2\omega C_{k-1}^{\omega+1}(t)\), \(k \geq1\);

  3. (3)

    \(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} C_{k}^{\omega}(1)r^{k}=(1-r)^{-2\omega}\);

  4. (4)

    \(|C^{\frac{n-\alpha}{2}}_{k} (t)-C^{\frac{n-\alpha}{2}}_{k} ( t^{\ast})| \leq(n-\alpha)C^{\frac{n-\alpha+2}{2}}_{k-1} (1)|t-t^{\ast}|\), \(|t|\leq1\), \(|t^{\ast}|\leq1\).



(1) and (2) can be derived from [1], p.232. Equality (3) follows from expression (1.1) by taking \(t=1\); property (4) is an easy consequence of the mean value theorem, (1) and also (2). □

Lemma 3

For \(x, y\in{\mathbf{R}}^{n}\) (\(\alpha=n=2\)), we have the following properties:
  1. (1)

    \(|\Im \sum_{k=0}^{m}\frac{x^{k}}{y^{k+1}}|\leq\sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \frac{2^{k} x_{n} |x|^{k}}{|y|^{k+2}} \);

  2. (2)

    \(|\Im\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{k+m+1}}{y^{k}}|\leq 2^{m+1}x_{n} |x|^{m}\);

  3. (3)

    \(|G_{n,m}(x,y)-G_{n}(x,y)|\leq M \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{k x_{n} y_{n} |x|^{k-1}}{|y|^{k+1}}\);

  4. (4)

    \(|G_{n,m}(x,y)|\leq M \sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty} \frac{k x_{n} y_{n} |x|^{k-1}}{|y|^{k+1}}\).


The following lemma can be proved by using Fuglede (see [11], Théorèm 7.8).

Lemma 4

For any Borel set E in H, we have \(C_{k_{\alpha}}(E)=\hat{C}_{k_{\alpha}}(E)\), where \(\hat{C}_{k_{\alpha}}(E)=\inf\lambda(H)\), \(k_{\alpha}=k_{\alpha,0,0}\), the infimum being taken over all non-negative measures λ on H such that \(k_{\alpha}(\lambda,x)\geq1\) for every \(x \in E\).

Following [10], we say that a set \(E\subset H\) is α-thin at the boundary ∂H if
$$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}2^{i(n-\alpha)}C_{k_{\alpha}}(E_{i})< \infty, $$
where \(E_{i}=\{x\in E: 2^{-i}\leq x_{n} <2^{-i+1}\}\).

3 Proof of Theorem

We write
$$\begin{aligned} G_{\alpha,m}(x,\mu) =&\int_{G_{1}}G_{\alpha}(x,y) \,d \mu(y)+\int_{G_{2}}G_{\alpha}(x,y) \,d\mu(y)+\int _{G_{3}}\bigl[G_{\alpha,m}(x,y)-G_{\alpha}(x,y)\bigr] \,d\mu(y) \\ &{}+\int_{G_{4}}G_{\alpha,m}(x,y) \,d\mu(y)+\int _{G_{5}}G_{\alpha,m}(x,y) \,d\mu(y) \\ =&U_{1}(x)+U_{2}(x)+U_{3}(x)+U_{4}(x)+U_{5}(x), \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& G_{1}=\biggl\{ y\in H:|x-y|\leq\frac{x_{n}}{2}\biggr\} , \qquad G_{2}=\biggl\{ y\in H:|y|\geq1, \frac{x_{n}}{2}< |x-y|\leq3|x|\biggr\} , \\& G_{3}=\bigl\{ y\in H:|y|\geq1,\vert x-y\vert \leq3|x|\bigr\} , \qquad G_{4}=\bigl\{ y\in H:|y|\geq1,\vert x-y\vert > 3|x|\bigr\} , \\& G_{5}=\biggl\{ y\in H:|y|< 1,|x-y|> \frac{x_{n}}{2}\biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$

We distinguish the following two cases.

Case 1. \(0<\alpha<n\).

By assumption (1.2) we can find a sequence \(\{a_{i}\}\) of positive numbers such that \(\lim_{i\rightarrow\infty} a_{i}=\infty\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}a_{i}b_{i}<\infty\), where
$$b_{i}=\int_{\{y \in H:2^{-i-1}< y_{n}< 2^{-i+2}\}}\frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y). $$
Consider the sets
$$E_{i}=\biggl\{ x\in H: 2^{-i}\leq x_{n}< 2^{-i+1}, \frac{x_{n}^{n-\alpha-\beta+\delta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta +2}}U_{1}(x)\geq a_{i}^{-1}2^{(i-1)\beta} \biggr\} $$
for \(i=1,2,\ldots\) . Set
$$G=\bigcup_{x\in E_{i}}B\biggl(x,\frac{x_{n}}{2}\biggr). $$
Then \(G\subset\{y \in H:2^{-i-1}< y_{n}< 2^{-i+2}\}\). Let ν be a non-negative measure on H such that \(S_{\nu}\subset E_{i}\), where \(S_{\nu}\) is the support of ν. Then we have \(k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta}(y,\nu)\leq1\) for \(y\in H\) and
$$\begin{aligned} \int_{H} d\nu \leq& a_{i}2^{(-i+1)\beta} \int _{H} \frac{x_{n}^{n-\alpha-\beta+\delta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta +2}}U_{1}(x)\,d\nu(x) \\ \leq& M a_{i}2^{(-i+1)\beta} 2^{(-i+1)(n-\alpha+\delta+1)}\int _{G}k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta}(y,\nu )\frac{y_{n}^{\delta}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}} \,d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M a_{i}2^{(-i+1)\beta} 2^{(-i+1)(n-\alpha+\delta+1)} 2^{i+1} \int _{\{y\in H: 2^{-i-1}< y_{n}< 2^{-i+2}\}}\frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\,d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M 2^{n-\alpha+\beta+\delta+2}2^{-i{(n-\alpha+\beta+\delta)}}a_{i} b_{i}. \end{aligned}$$
So that
$$C_{k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta}}(E_{i})\leq M 2^{-i{(n-\alpha+\beta+\delta )}}a_{i} b_{i}, $$
which yields
$$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}2^{i(n-\alpha+\beta+\delta)}C_{k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta }}(E_{i})< \infty. $$
Setting \(E=\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}E_{i}\), we see that (2) in Theorem is satisfied and
$$ \lim_{x_{n} \rightarrow0, x\in H-E} \frac{x_{n}^{n-\alpha-\beta+\delta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}U_{1}(x)=0. $$
For \(U_{2}(x)\), by Lemma 1 we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert U_{2}(x)\bigr\vert \leq& M x_{n} \int_{G_{2}}\frac{y_{n}}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha+2}} \, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}^{\alpha-n-1}|x|^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}\int _{G_{2}} \frac{1}{y_{n}^{\delta}}\frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta +2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}^{\alpha-n-1}|x|^{n+m-\alpha+2}\int _{G_{2}} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y). \end{aligned}$$
Note that \(C^{\omega}_{0} ( t )\equiv1\). By (3) and (4) in Lemma 2, we take \(t=\frac{x\cdot y}{|x||y|}\), \(t^{\ast}=\frac{x\cdot y^{\ast}}{|x||y^{\ast}|}\) in Lemma 2(4) and obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert U_{3}(x)\bigr\vert \leq& \int _{G_{3}}\sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{|x|^{k}}{|y|^{n-\alpha+k}} 2(n-\alpha)C^{\frac{n-\alpha+2}{2}}_{k-1} (1) \frac{x_{n}y_{n}}{|x||y|} \frac{2|y|^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m} \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{4^{k-1}}C^{\frac{n-\alpha+2}{2}}_{k-1} (1) \int_{G_{3}} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m}. \end{aligned}$$
Similarly, we have by (3) and (4) in Lemma 2
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert U_{4}(x)\bigr\vert \leq& \int _{G_{4}}\sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty} \frac{|x|^{k}}{|y|^{n-\alpha+k}} 2(n-\alpha)C^{\frac{n-\alpha+2}{2}}_{k-1}(1)\frac{x_{n}y_{n}}{|x||y|} \frac{2|y|^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m} \sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^{k-1}}C^{\frac{n-\alpha+2}{2}}_{k-1} (1) \int_{G_{4}} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m}. \end{aligned}$$
Finally, by Lemma 1, we have
$$ \bigl\vert U_{5}(x)\bigr\vert \leq M x_{n}^{\alpha-n-1} \int_{G_{5}}\frac{y_{n}^{\delta +1}}{(1+|y|)^{n+m-\alpha+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y). $$

Combining (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4) and (3.5), by Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem, we prove Case 1.

Case 2. \(\alpha=n=2\).

In this case, \(U_{1}(x)\), \(U_{2}(x)\) and \(U_{5}(x)\) can be proved similarly as in Case 1. Here we omit the details and state the following facts:
$$ \lim_{x_{n} \rightarrow0, x_{n}\in H-E} \frac{x_{n}^{\delta-\beta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{m+\delta+2}}U_{1}(x)=0, $$
where \(E=\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}E_{i}\) and \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}2^{i(\beta+\delta)}C_{k_{\alpha,\beta,\delta }}(E_{i})<\infty\),
$$ \lim_{x_{n} \rightarrow0, x_{n}\in H} \frac{x_{n}^{\delta-\beta+1}}{(1+|x|)^{m+\delta+2}}\bigl[U_{2}(x)+U_{5}(x) \bigr]=0. $$
By Lemma 3(3), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert U_{3}(x)\bigr\vert \leq& \int _{G_{3}}\sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{k x_{n} y_{n} |x|^{k-1}}{|y|^{k+1}} \frac{2|y|^{m+\delta+2}}{y_{n}^{\delta+1}} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{m+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m} \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{k}{4^{k-1}}\int_{G_{3}}\frac{y_{n}^{\delta +1}}{(1+|y|)^{m+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m}. \end{aligned}$$
By Lemma 3(4), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert U_{4}(x)\bigr\vert \leq& \int _{G_{4}}\sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty} \frac{k x_{n} y_{n} |x|^{k-1}}{|y|^{k+1}} \frac{2|y|^{m+\delta+2}}{y_{n}^{\delta+1}} \frac{y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{m+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m} \sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty} \frac{k}{2^{k-1}}\int_{G_{4}}\frac {y_{n}^{\delta+1}}{(1+|y|)^{m+\delta+2}}\, d\mu(y) \\ \leq& M x_{n}|x|^{m}. \end{aligned}$$

Combining (3.6), (3.7), (3.8) and (3.9), we prove Case 2.

Hence the proof of the theorem is completed.



The authors are highly grateful for the referees’ careful reading and comments on this paper. This work was completed while the authors were visiting the Department of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Wollongong, and they are grateful for the kind hospitality of the Department.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

College of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan Institute of Education, Zhengzhou, 450046, China
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia


  1. Szegö, G: Orthogonal Polynomials. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 23. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1975) Google Scholar
  2. Ren, YD, Yang, P: Growth estimates for modified Neumann integrals in a half space. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 572 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu, G, Yang, P, Zhao, T: Dirichlet problems of harmonic functions. Bound. Value Probl. 2013, 262 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yang, DW, Ren, YD: Dirichlet problem on the upper half space. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 124(2), 175-178 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Qiao, L: Integral representations for harmonic functions of infinite order in a cone. Results Math. 61, 62-74 (2012) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Qiao, L, Pan, GS: Generalization of the Phragmén-Lindelöf theorems for subfunctions. Int. J. Math. 24(8), 1350062 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liao, Y, Su, BY: Solutions of the Dirichlet problem in a tube domain. Acta Math. Sin. 57(6), 1209-1220 (2014) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Su, BY: Dirichlet problem for the Schrödinger operator in a half space. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 578197 (2012) Google Scholar
  9. Polidoro, S, Ragusa, MA: Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic ultraparabolic equations with a singular lower order term. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 24(3), 1011-1046 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Armitage, H: Tangential behavior of Green potentials and contractive properties of \(L^{p}\)-potentials. Tokyo J. Math. 9, 223-245 (1986) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuglede, B: Le théorèm du minimax et la théorie fine du potentiel. Ann. Inst. Fourier 15, 65-88 (1965) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zhang and Piskarev 2015