Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A new application of boundary integral behaviors of harmonic functions to the least harmonic majorant

This article was retracted on 22 January 2020

This article has been updated


Our main aim in this paper is to obtain a new type of boundary integral behaviors of harmonic functions in a smooth cone. As an application, the least harmonic majorant of a nonnegative subharmonic function is also given.

1 Introduction

Let \(B(P,R)\) denote the open ball with center at P and radius R in \(\mathbf{R}^{n}\), where \(\mathbf{R}^{n}\) is the n-dimensional Euclidean space, \(P\in\mathbf{R}^{n}\) and \(R>0\). Let \(B(P)\) denote the neighborhood of P and \(S_{R}=B(O,R)\) for simplicity. The unit sphere and the upper half unit sphere in \(\mathbf{R}^{n}\) are denoted by \(\mathbf{S}_{1}\) and \(\mathbf{S}_{1}^{+}\), respectively. For simplicity, a point \((1,\Theta)\) on \(\mathbf{S}_{1}\) and the set \(\{\Theta; (1,\Theta)\in\Gamma\}\) for a set Γ, \(\Gamma\subset\mathbf{S}_{1}\), are often identified with Θ and Γ, respectively. Let \(\Lambda\times\Gamma\) denote the set \(\{(r,\Theta)\in \mathbf{R}^{n}; r\in\Lambda,(1,\Theta)\in\Gamma\}\), where \(\Lambda\subset\mathbf{R}_{+}\) and \(\Gamma\subset\mathbf{S}_{1}\). We denote the set \(\mathbf{R}_{+}\times\mathbf{S}_{1}^{+}=\{(X,x_{n})\in\mathbf{R}^{n}; x_{n}>0\}\) by \(\mathbf{T}_{n}\), which is called the half space.

We shall also write \(h_{1}\approx h_{2}\) for two positive functions \(h_{1}\) and \(h_{2}\) if and only if there exists a positive constant a such that \(a^{-1}h_{1}\leq h_{2}\leq ah_{1}\). We denote \(\max\{u(r,\Theta),0\}\) and \(\max\{-u(r,\Theta),0\}\) by \(u^{+}(r,\Theta)\) and \(u^{-}(r,\Theta)\), respectively.

The set \(\mathbf{R}_{+}\times\Gamma\) in \(\mathbf{R}^{n}\) is called a cone. We denote it by \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), where \(\Gamma\subset\mathbf{S}_{1}\). The sets \(I\times\Gamma\) and \(I\times \partial{\Gamma}\) with an interval on R are denoted by \(\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma;I)\) and \(\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;I)\), respectively. We denote \(\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)\cap S_{R}\) and \(\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma; (0,+\infty))\) by \(\mathfrak {S}_{n}(\Gamma; R)\) and \(\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)\), respectively.

Furthermore, we denote by (resp. \(dS_{R}\)) the \((n-1)\)-dimensional volume elements induced by the Euclidean metric on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) (resp. \(S_{R}\)) and by dw the elements of the Euclidean volume in \(\mathbf{R}^{n}\).

It is known (see, e.g., [1], p.41) that

$$ \begin{gathered} \Delta^{*}\varphi(\Theta)+\lambda \varphi(\Theta)=0 \quad \textrm{in } \Gamma, \\ \varphi(\Theta)=0 \quad \textrm{on } \partial{\Gamma}, \end{gathered} $$

where \(\Delta^{*}\) is the Laplace-Beltrami operator. We denote the least positive eigenvalue of this boundary value problem (1.1) by λ and the normalized positive eigenfunction corresponding to λ by \(\varphi(\Theta)\), \(\int_{\Gamma}\varphi^{2}(\Theta)\,dS_{1}=1\).

We remark that the function \(r^{\aleph^{\pm}}\varphi(\Theta)\) is harmonic in \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), belongs to the class \(C^{2}(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )\backslash\{O\})\) and vanishes on \(\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)\), where

$$2\aleph^{\pm}=-n+2\pm\sqrt{(n-2)^{2}+4\lambda}. $$

For simplicity we shall write χ instead of \(\aleph^{+}-\aleph^{-}\).

For simplicity we shall assume that the boundary of the domain Γ is twice continuously differentiable, \(\varphi\in C^{2}(\overline{\Gamma})\) and \(\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial n}>0\) on Γ. Then (see [2], pp.7-8)

$$ \operatorname{dist}(\Theta,\partial{\Gamma})\approx\varphi(\Theta), $$

where \(\Theta\in\Gamma\).

Let \(\delta(P)=\operatorname{dist}(P,\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)})\), we have

$$ \varphi(\Theta)\approx\delta(P) $$

for any \(P=(1,\Theta)\in\Gamma\) (see [3, 4]).

Let \(u(r,\Theta)\) be a function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). For any given \(r\in\mathbf{R}_{+}\), the integral

$$\int_{\Gamma}u(r,\Theta)\varphi(\Theta)\,d S_{1} $$

is denoted by \(\mathcal{N}_{u}(r)\) when it exists. The finite or infinite limit

$$\lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}r^{-\aleph^{+}}\mathcal{N}_{u}(r) $$

is denoted by \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\) when it exists.

Remark 1

A function \(g(t)\) on \((0,\infty)\) is \(\mathbb{A}_{d_{1},d_{2}}\)-convex if and only if \(g(t)t^{d_{2}}\) is a convex function of \(t^{d}\) (\(d=d_{1}+d_{2}\)) on \((0,\infty)\) or, equivalently, if and only if \(g(t)t^{-d_{1}}\) is a convex function of \(t^{-d}\) on \((0,\infty)\).

Remark 2

\(\mathcal{N}_{u}(r)\) is \(\mathbb{A}_{\aleph^{+},\gamma-1}\)-convex on \((0,\infty)\), where u is a subharmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) such that

$$ \limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma),P\rightarrow Q }u(P)\leq0 $$

for any \(Q\in \partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) (see [5]).

The function

$$\mathbb{P}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}(P,Q)=\frac{\partial\mathbb {G}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}(P,Q)}{\partial n_{Q}} $$

is called the ordinary Poisson kernel, where \(\mathbb{G}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) is the Green function.

The Poisson integral of g relative to \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) is defined by

$$\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)} [g](P)=\frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)}\mathbb{P}_{\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)}(P,Q)g(Q)\,d\sigma, $$

where g is a continuous function on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) and \(\frac{\partial}{\partial n_{Q}}\) denotes the differentiation at Q along the inward normal into \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\).

We set functions f satisfying

$$ \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)}\frac{ \vert f(t,\Phi) \vert ^{p}}{1+t^{\gamma}}\,d\sigma< \infty, $$

where \(p>0\) and

$$\gamma>\frac{-\aleph^{+}-n+2}{p}+n-1. $$

Further, we denote by \(\mathcal{A}_{\Gamma}\) the class of all measurable functions \(g(t,\Phi)\) (\(Q=(t,\Phi)=(Y, y_{n})\in \mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)) satisfying the following inequality:

$$ \int_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\frac{ \vert g(t,\Phi) \vert ^{p}\varphi}{1+t^{\gamma+1}}\,dw< \infty, $$

and the class \(\mathcal{B}_{\Gamma}\) consists of all measurable functions \(h(t,\Phi)\) (\((t,\Phi)=(Y, y_{n})\in\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)\)) satisfying

$$ \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma)}\frac{ \vert h(t,\Phi) \vert ^{p}}{1+t^{\gamma-1}}\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial n}\,d\sigma< \infty. $$

We will also consider the class of all continuous functions \(u(t,\Phi)\) (\((t,\Phi)\in\overline{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)) harmonic in \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) with \(u^{+}(t,\Phi)\in \mathcal{A}_{\Gamma}\) (\((t,\Phi)\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)), and \(u^{+}(t,\Phi)\in\mathcal{B}_{\Gamma}\) (\((t,\Phi)\in\mathfrak {S}_{n}(\Gamma)\)) is denoted by \(\mathcal{C}_{\Gamma}\).

Remark 3

If we denote \(\Gamma=S_{1}^{+}\) in (1.6) and (1.7), we have

$$\int_{T_{n}}y_{n} \bigl\vert f(Y,y_{n}) \bigr\vert \bigl(1+t^{n+2}\bigr)^{-1}\,dQ< \infty \quad \textrm{and}\quad \int_{\partial{T_{n}}} \bigl\vert g(Y,0) \bigr\vert \bigl(1+t^{n}\bigr)^{-1}\,dY< \infty. $$

Recently Zhao and Yamada (see [6]) obtained the following result.

Theorem A

Letgbe a measurable function on \(\partial{T_{n}}\)such that

$$\int_{\partial{T_{n}}}\frac{ \vert g(Q) \vert }{1+ \vert Q \vert ^{n}} \,dQ< \infty. $$

Then the harmonic function \(\mathbb{PI}_{T_{n}}[g]\)satisfies \(\mathbb{PI}_{T_{n}}[g](P)=o(r \sec^{n-1}\theta_{1})\)as \(r\rightarrow\infty\)in \(T_{n}\).

Recently Wang and Qiao (see [7]) generalized Theorem A to the conical case.

Theorem B

Letgbe a continuous function on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)satisfying (1.5) with \(p=1\)and \(\gamma=-\aleph^{-}+1\). Then

$$\mathscr{U}_{\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g]}=\mathscr {U}_{\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[ \vert g \vert ]}=0. $$

2 Results

Our main aim in this paper is to give the least harmonic majorant of a nonnegative subharmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). For related results, we refer the reader to the papers [8, 9].

Theorem 1

Ifuis a subharmonic function on a domain containing \(\overline{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\), \(u\geq0\)on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)and \(u'=u\vert\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )}\) (the restriction ofuto \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)) satisfies (1.5), then the limit \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\) (\(0\leq\mathscr{U}_{u}\leq+\infty\)) exists. Further, if \(\mathscr{U}_{u}<+\infty\), then

$$ u(P)\leq h_{u}(P)=\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)} \bigl[u'\bigr](P)+M\mathscr {U}_{u}r^{\aleph^{+}} \varphi(\Theta)\quad \bigl(P=(r,\Theta)\in\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma) \bigr), $$

where \(h_{u}(P)\)is the least harmonic majorant ofuon \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\).

3 Main lemmas

Lemma 1

Letube a function subharmonic on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)satisfying (1.4) for any \(Q\in\partial {\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). Then the limit \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\) (\(-\infty<\mathscr{U}_{u}\leq+\infty\)) exists.


It suffices to prove that the limit \(\lim_{r\rightarrow0}r^{\gamma-1}\mathcal{N}_{u}(r)\) exists, then apply it to the function

$$u''(r,\Theta)=r^{2-n}(u\circ K) (r,\Theta), $$

where \(K: (r,\Theta)\rightarrow(r^{-1},\Theta)\) is the Kelvin transform (see [10], pp.36-37). Consider the auxiliary function

$$I(s)=s^{\frac{\aleph^{+}}{\chi}}\mathcal{N}_{u}\bigl(s^{-\frac{1}{\chi}}\bigr) $$

on \((a^{-\chi},+\infty)\). Then, from Remarks 1 and 2, \(I(s)\) is a convex function on \((a^{-\chi},+\infty)\). Hence

$$\zeta=\lim_{s\rightarrow\infty}s^{-1}I(s)=\lim_{r\rightarrow0}r^{\gamma -1} \mathcal{N}_{u}(r)\quad (-\infty< \zeta\leq+\infty) $$

exists. □

Lemma 2

Letube a nonnegative subharmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)satisfying (1.4) for any \(Q\in \partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)and

$$ \mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}< +\infty. $$


$$u(r,\Theta)\leq M \mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}r^{\aleph^{+}}\varphi(\Theta) $$

for any \((r,\Theta)\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), whereMis a positive constant.


Take any \((r,\Theta)\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) and any pair of numbers \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\) (\(0<2R_{1}<r<\frac{1}{2}R_{2}<+\infty\)). We define a boundary function on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2}))}\) by

$$\nu(r,\Theta)= \textstyle\begin{cases} u(R_{i},\Theta) & \mbox{on } \{R_{i}\}\times\Gamma\ (i=1,2), \\ 0 &\mbox{on } [R_{1},R_{2}]\times\partial{\Gamma}. \end{cases} $$

This is an upper semi-continuous function which is bounded above. If we denote Perron-Wiener-Brelot solution of the Dirichlet problem on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2}))\) with ν by \(H_{\nu}((r,\Theta);\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2})))\), then we have

$$\begin{aligned} u(r,\Theta) \leq& H_{\nu}\bigl((r,\Theta); \mathfrak{C}_{n}\bigl(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2})\bigr) \bigr) \\ \leq& \frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\Gamma}u^{+}(R_{1},\Theta) \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2}))}((R_{1},\Phi),(r,\Theta ))}{\partial R}R_{1}^{n-1}\,dS_{1} \\ &{}-\frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\Gamma}u^{+}(R_{2},\Theta) \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(R_{1},R_{2}))}((R_{2},\Phi),(r,\Theta ))}{\partial R}R_{2}^{n-1}\,dS_{1}, \end{aligned}$$

which gives that

$$ u(r,\Theta)\leq M R_{1}^{\gamma-1} \mathcal{N}_{u^{+}}(R_{1})r^{\aleph ^{-}}\varphi(\Theta)+M R_{2}^{-\aleph^{+}}\mathcal {N}_{u^{+}}(R_{2})r^{\aleph^{+}} \varphi(\Theta). $$

As \(R_{1}\rightarrow0\) and \(R_{2}\rightarrow+\infty\) in (3.2), we complete the proof by (3.1). □

Lemma 3

Letgbe a locally integrable function on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)satisfying (1.5) andube a subharmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\)satisfying

$$ \limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}\bigl\{ u(P)-\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g](P) \bigr\} \leq0 $$


$$ \limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}\bigl\{ u^{+}(P)- \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[ \vert g \vert \bigr](P)\bigr\} \leq0 $$

for any \(Q\in\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). Then the limits \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\)and \(\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}\) (\(-\infty<\mathscr{U}_{u}\leq+\infty\), \(0\leq\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}\leq+\infty\)) exist, and if (3.1) is satisfied, then

$$ u(P)\leq \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g](P)+M\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}r^{\aleph ^{+}} \varphi(\Theta), $$

whereMis a positive constant and \(P=(r,\Theta)\in\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)\).


Consider two subharmonic functions

$$U(P)=u(P)-\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )}[g](P)\quad \mbox{and}\quad U'(P)=u^{+}(P)-\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )}\bigl[ \vert g \vert \bigr](P) $$

on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). From (3.3) and (3.4) we have

$$\limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}U(P)\leq0\quad \mbox{and}\quad \limsup _{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}U'(P)\leq0 $$

for any \(Q\in\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). Hence it follows from Lemma 1 that the limits \(\mathscr{U}_{U}\) and \(\mathscr{U}_{U'}\) (\(-\infty<\mathscr{U}_{U}\leq+\infty\), \(0\leq\mathscr{U}_{U'}\leq+\infty\)) exist. Since

$$\mathcal{N}_{U}(r)=\mathcal{N}_{u}(r)- \mathcal{N}_{\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g]}(r)\quad \mbox{and}\quad \mathcal{N}_{U'}(r)= \mathcal {N}_{u^{+}}(r)-\mathcal{N}_{\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[ \vert g \vert ]}(r), $$

Theorem B (Theorem 1 will be proved in the next section) gives the existences of the limits \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\), \(\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}\),

$$ \mathscr{U}_{U}=\mathscr{U}_{u} \quad \mbox{and}\quad \mathscr{U}_{U'}=\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}. $$

Since \(0\leq U^{+}(P)\leq u^{+}(P)+(\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )}[g])^{-}(P)\) on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), it also follows from Theorem B and (3.1) that

$$\mathscr{U}_{U^{+}}\leq\mathscr{U}_{u^{+}}< \infty. $$

Hence, by applying Lemma 2 to \(U(P)\), we obtain the conclusion from (3.6). □

Lemma 4

Letgbe a nonnegative lower semi-continuous function on \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)satisfying (1.5) andube a nonnegative subharmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )\)such that

$$ \limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}u(P)\leq g(Q) $$

for any \(Q\in\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). Then the limit \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\) (\(0\leq\mathscr{U}_{u}\leq+\infty\)) exists, and if \(\mathscr{U}_{u}<+\infty\), then

$$u(P)\leq \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g](P)+M\mathscr{U}_{u}r^{\aleph ^{+}} \varphi(\Theta) $$

for any \(P=(r,\Theta)\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\).


Since −g is an upper semi-continuous function \(\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\), it follows from [11], p.3, that

$$ \liminf_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g](P) \geq g(Q) $$

for any \(Q\in \partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). We see from (3.7) and (3.8) that

$$\limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}\bigl\{ u(P)-\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}[g](P)\bigr\} \leq0 $$

for any \(Q\in \partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\), which gives (3.3). Since g and u are nonnegative, (3.4) also holds. Thus we obtain the conclusion from Lemma 3. □

Lemma 5

Letube subharmonic on a domain containing \(\overline{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)such that \(u'=u\vert\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\)satisfies (1.5) and \(u\geq0\)on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). Then \(\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma )}[u'](P)\leq h(P)\)on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), where \(h(P)\)is any harmonic majorant ofuon \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\).


Take any \(P'=(r',\Theta')\in \mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). Let ϵ be any positive number. In the same way as in the proof of Lemma 2, we can choose R such that

$$ \frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;(R,\infty))}\mathbb {P}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl(P',Q \bigr)u'(Q)\,d\sigma< \frac{\epsilon}{2}. $$

Further, take an integer j (\(j>R\)) such that

$$ \frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,R))}\frac{\partial\Gamma_{j}(P',Q) }{\partial n_{Q}}u'(Q)\,d\sigma< \frac{\epsilon}{2}. $$


$$\frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,R))}\frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,j))}(P,Q) }{\partial n_{Q}}u'(Q)\,d\sigma\leq H_{u}\bigl(P;\mathfrak{C}_{n}\bigl(\Gamma;(0,j)\bigr)\bigr) $$

for any \(P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,j))\), we have from (3.9) and (3.10) that (see [12])

$$\begin{aligned} & \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[u'\bigr]\bigl(P' \bigr)-H_{u}\bigl(P';\mathfrak {C}_{n}\bigl( \Gamma;(0,j)\bigr)\bigr) \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,R))}\frac{\partial \Gamma_{j}(P',Q) }{\partial n_{Q}}u'(Q)\,d\sigma \\ &\qquad {} +\frac{1}{c_{n}} \int_{\mathfrak{S}_{n}(\Gamma;(R,\infty))}\mathbb {P}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl(P',Q \bigr)u'(Q)\,d\sigma \\ &\quad < \epsilon. \end{aligned}$$

Here note that \(H_{u}(P;\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,j)))\) is the least harmonic majorant of u on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma;(0,j))\) (see [13], Theorem 3.15). If h is a harmonic majorant of u on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), then

$$H_{u}\bigl(P';\mathfrak{C}_{n}\bigl( \Gamma;(0,j)\bigr)\bigr)\leq h\bigl(P'\bigr). $$

Thus we obtain from (3.11) that

$$\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[u'\bigr]\bigl(P' \bigr)< h\bigl(P'\bigr)+\epsilon, $$

which gives the conclusion of Lemma 5. □

4 Proof of Theorem 1

Let \(P=(r,\Theta)\) be any point of \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) and ϵ be any positive number. By the Vitali-Carathéodory theorem (see [10], p.56), we can find a lower semi-continuous function \(g'(Q)\) on \(\partial{\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) such that

$$ u'(Q)\leq g'(Q)\quad \mbox{on } \mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma) $$


$$ \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[g'\bigr](P)< \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[u'\bigr](P)+\epsilon. $$


$$\lim_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}u(P)\leq u'(Q)\leq g'(Q) $$

for any \(Q\in\partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\) from (4.1), it follows from Lemma 4 that the limit \(\mathscr{U}_{u}\) exists (see [11]), and if \(\mathscr{U}_{u}<+\infty\), then

$$ u(P)\leq\mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[g' \bigr](P)+M\mathscr {U}_{u}r^{\aleph^{+}}\varphi(\Theta). $$

Hence we have from (4.2) and (4.3) that (2.1) holds.

Next we shall assume that \(h_{u}(P)\) is the least harmonic majorant of u on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). Set \(h''(P)\) is a harmonic function on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\) such that

$$ u(P)\leq h''(P)\quad \mbox{on } \mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma). $$

Consider the harmonic function

$$h^{\ast}(P)=h_{u}(P)-h''(P)\quad \mbox{on }\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma). $$


$$h^{\ast}(P)\leq h_{u}(P)\quad \mbox{on }\mathfrak{C}_{n}( \Gamma), $$

Theorem B gives that \(\mathscr{U}_{{h^{\ast}}^{+}}<+\infty\). Further, from Lemma 2 we see that

$$\limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q}h^{\ast}(P)=\limsup_{P\in\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma), P\rightarrow Q} \bigl\{ \mathbb{PI}_{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigl[u'\bigr](P)-h''(P) \bigr\} \leq0 $$

for any \(Q\in \partial{\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)}\). From Theorem B and (4.4) we know

$$\mathscr{U}_{h^{\ast}}=\mathscr{U}_{h_{u}}-\mathscr{U}_{h''}= \mathscr {U}_{u}-\mathscr{U}_{h''}\leq\mathscr{U}_{u}- \mathscr{U}_{u}=0. $$

We see from Lemma 2 that \(h^{\ast}(P)\leq0\) on \(\mathfrak {C}_{n}(\Gamma)\), which shows that \(h_{u}(P)\) is the least harmonic majorant of \(u(P)\) on \(\mathfrak{C}_{n}(\Gamma)\). Theorem 1 is proved.

5 Conclusions

In this article, we have obtained a new type of boundary integral behaviors of harmonic functions in a smooth cone. As an application, we also gave the least harmonic majorant of a nonnegative subharmonic function.

6 Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

7 Consent for publication

Not applicable.

8 List of abbreviations

Not applicable.

9 Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Change history


  1. Rosenblum, G, Solomyak, M, Shubin, M: Spectral Theory of Differential Operators. VINITI, Moscow (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miranda, C: Partial Differential Equations of Elliptic Type. Springer, Berlin (1970)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Courant, R, Hilbert, D: Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 1. Interscience, New York (1953)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, G, Yang, P, Zhao, T: Dirichlet problems of harmonic functions. Bound. Value Probl. 2013, 262 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wanby, G: Convexity of means and growth of certain subharmonic functions in an n-dimensional cone. Ark. Math. 21, 29-43 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, T, Yamada, A Jr.: Growth properties of Green-Sch potentials at infinity. Bound. Value Probl. 2014, 245 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, F, Qiao, L: The w-weak global dimension of commutative rings. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 52(4), 1327-1338 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Albanese, G, Rigoli, M: Lichnerowicz-type equations on complete manifolds. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 5(3), 223-250 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonda, A, Garrione, M, Gidoni, P: Periodic perturbations of Hamiltonian systems. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 5(4), 367-382 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Helms, LL: Introduction to Potential Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, J: Persistent excitation in a shunt DC motor under adaptive control. Asian J. Control 9(1), 37-44 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng, C, Huang, J: Almost periodic solutions of nonautonomous Lotka-Volterra competitive systems with dominated delays. Int. J. Biomath. 8(2), 1550019 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayman, WH, Kennedy, PB: Subharmonic Functions, vol. 1. Academic Press, London (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the editor, the associate editor and the anonymous referees for their careful reading and constructive comments which have helped us to significantly improve the presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaoying Xue.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

GX drafted the manuscript. MH helped to draft the manuscript and revised the written English. JS helped to draft the manuscript and revised it according to the referee reports. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article [1] because of overlap with articles from different authors that were simultaneously under consideration with another journal [2, 3]. Additionally, this article shows evidence of both authorship and peer review manipulation. The authors have not responded to any correspondence about this retraction.

[1] Han, M., Sun, J. and Xue, G. Bound Value Probl (2017) 2017: 67.

[2] Wan, L. Further result on Dirichlet-Sch type inequality and its application. J Inequal Appl 2017, 104 (2017) doi:10.1186/s13660-017-1381-4

[3] Shu, C., Chen, L. and Vargas-De-Teón, R. Poisson type inequalities with respect to a cone and their applications. J Inequal Appl 2017, 114 (2017) doi:10.1186/s13660-017-1387-y

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, M., Sun, J. & Xue, G. RETRACTED ARTICLE: A new application of boundary integral behaviors of harmonic functions to the least harmonic majorant. Bound Value Probl 2017, 67 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • boundary integral behavior
  • subharmonic function
  • harmonic majorant