- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Existence and general decay estimate for a nonlinear plate problem
Boundary Value Problems volume 2018, Article number: 11 (2018)
Abstract
In this work, we study a plate equation modelling a suspension bridge with weak damping and hanger restoring force. We prove the well-posedness and establish an explicit and general decay result without putting restrictive growth conditions on the frictional damping term.
1 Introduction
The study of plate problems has been widely investigated by mathematicians and other scientists. Plate problems have a lot of applications in different areas of science and engineering such as material engineering, mechanical engineering, nuclear physics and optics. In order to describe the structural behaviour and the stability of large structures in our societies, plate models have been extensively used. For instance, the Kirchhoff theory of plates [1] establishes a two-dimensional mathematical model that is used to determine the stresses and deformations in thin plates subjected to forces and moments. The stability of Kirchhoff plates in the presence of a linear or nonlinear source has been studied by many authors. See, for instance, the results obtained in Komornik [2], Lagnese [3] and Lasiecka [4, 5]. Al-Gharabli and Messaoudi [6] studied the following nonlinear plate problem:
and established decay of solutions. Lu [7] investigated the nonautonomous plate-type evolutionary problem
and proved the existence of a uniform attractor. Ji and Lasiecka [8] considered a semilinear Kirchhoff plate with a nonlinear dissipation acting via moments
and proved that the plate is uniformly stabilizable with uniform energy decay rates with respect to the parameter γ which represents rotational force. Moreover, they showed that as \(\gamma\longrightarrow 0\), the solutions of the Kirchhoff plate equation converge to the solutions of the semilinear Euler-Bernoulli plate, which is also uniformly stable in finite energy norm.
Recently, plate models have also been of great importance in studying the structural behaviour and instability of suspension bridges. The first attempt to model a suspension bridge through a plate is due to Ferrero and Gazzola [9], where the following hyperbolic problem was introduced:
where \({\Omega=(0,\pi) \times(-\ell,\ell) \subset\mathbb {R}^{2}}\) is a planar rectangular plate, σ is the Poisson ratio, η is the damping coefficient, h is the nonlinear restoring force of the hangers and f is an external force. The well-posedness and long-time behaviour of this problem were proved in [9] under suitable assumptions on h. A quasilinear stationary variant of this equation was as well suggested in [10]. Wang [11] considered the following fourth-order equation:
with the same boundary conditions and initial data as in [10]. He proved the existence and uniqueness of local solution and a finite time blow up result. Messaoudi and co-authors [12–16] have carried out extensive analysis of the suspension bridge plate model (1.4), where existence, decay and global attractor results have been established. For more related results, see Gazzola and Wang [17], Berchio et al. [18] and the book [19] on mathematical models for suspension bridges by Gazzola.
In this paper, we consider the following fourth-order plate equation:
with the same boundary and initial conditions as in (1.4), where g is a nonlinear function to be specified later, β is the damping coefficient and u represents the downward displacement of a vibrating suspension bridge under the effect of weak frictional damping.
The main aim is to discuss the well-posedness of problem (1.6) and the decay rate of the associated energy functional without any restrictive growth condition on the damping term g. For the well-posedness, we reformulate (1.6) into a semigroup setting and apply the semigroup theory (see Pazy [20]). For the decay rate, we exploit some convexity properties used by Mustafa and Messaoudi [21]. The rest of this work is organised as follows. In Section 2, we present preliminary materials which will be helpful in obtaining our results. In Section 3, we discuss the well-posedness of problem (1.6). In Section 4, we study the decay rate of the energy functional associated with problem (1.6).
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we state some preliminary material that will be helpful in achieving our result. We assume that the functions β, g and h satisfy the following assumptions:
- (A1):
-
\(\beta:\mathbb{R}_{+}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{+}\) is a nonincreasing differentiable function.
- (A2):
-
\(h:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is a locally Lipschitz nondecreasing function such that \(h(0)=0\), and denote \({H(s) = \int_{0}^{s} h(\tau)\, d \tau}\), which is positive, such that
$${ sh(s)- H(s)\geq0,\quad \forall s\in\mathbb{R}}. $$ - (A3):
-
\(g:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is a locally Lipschitz nondecreasing \(C^{1}\)-function such that there exist \(\epsilon, c_{1}, c_{2}>0\) and an increasing function \({ M\in C^{1} ( [0,+\infty) )}\) with M linear or \(M(0)=M'(0)=0\) is a strictly convex \(C^{2}\)-function on \({[0,\epsilon)}\) such that
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} c_{1}|s|\leq|g(s)|\leq c_{2}|s|, &\mbox{if } |s|\geq\epsilon, \\ s^{2} + g^{2}(s)\leq M^{-1}(sg(s)),& \mbox{if } |s|\leq\epsilon. \end{cases} $$(2.1)
Remark 2.1
-
1.
We obtain from assumption (A3) that \(sg(s)>0\) for \(s\neq0\).
-
2.
Assumption (A3) with \(\epsilon=1\) was first introduced by Lasiecka and Tataru [22], where decay estimates for a second-order nonlinear wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping were established.
-
3.
To achieve our decay result, we borrow the techniques used by Mustafa and Messaoudi in [21] to prove decay estimates for a second-order wave equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
As in [9], let us introduce the space
together with the inner product
For the completeness of the space \({H_{*}}^{2}(\Omega)\), we have the following results by Ferrero and Gazzola [9].
Lemma 2.1
([9])
Assume that \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{2}\). Then the usual \({H^{2}(\Omega )}\)-norm and the norm defined by \((\cdot,\cdot)_{H_{*}^{2}} = \|\cdot\|_{H_{\ast}^{2}(\Omega)}^{2}\) are equivalent. Moreover, \(H_{*}^{2}(\Omega)\) is a Hilbert space when endowed with the scalar product \((\cdot,\cdot)_{H_{*}^{2}}\).
Theorem 2.1
([9])
Assume that \(0 < \sigma<\frac{1}{2}\) and \({f \in L^{2}(\Omega )}\). Then there exists a unique \({ u \in H_{\ast}^{2}(\Omega)}\) such that
Remark 2.2
The function \({u \in H_{\ast}^{2}(\Omega)}\) satisfying (2.4) is called the weak solution of the stationary problem
Theorem 2.2
([9])
The weak solution \({ u\in H^{2}_{\ast}(\Omega)}\) of (2.4) is in \(H^{4}(\Omega)\), and there exists a constant \(C=C(l,\sigma )>0\) such that
In addition, if \({u\in C^{4}(\bar{\Omega})}\), then u is a classical solution of (2.5).
Lemma 2.2
([9])
Let \(u\in H_{*}^{2}(\Omega)\) and assume that \({1\leq p < +\infty}\). Then there exists a constant \({C_{*} = C_{*}(\Omega ,p)>0}\) such that
3 Well-posedness
In this section, we discuss the well-posedness of problem (1.6). We begin with the definition of a weak solution of problem (1.6).
Definition 3.1
We say that a function
is a weak solution of (1.6) if
Now, we reformulate problem (1.6) into a semigroup setting. Let \(u_{t} = v\), then problem (1.6) becomes
where
We introduce the Hilbert space
equipped with the inner product
where
Next, we consider the following stationary boundary conditions:
The domain of the operator A is defined as
We have the following existence and uniqueness result for problem (3.3).
Theorem 3.1
Let \({U_{0}\in\mathcal{H}}\) be given. Assume that (A1)-(A3) hold. Then problem (3.3) has a unique global weak solution
Proof
To achieve this result, we show that the operator A is maximal monotone and F is locally Lipschitz continuous. For the monotonicity and maximality, see [15] for a complete detail proof.
Local lipschitzness: Let \({U,V \in\mathbf{B}_{R}=\{(u,v)\in D(A): \|(u,v)\|_{\mathcal{H}}\leq R\}}\). By using Lemma 2.2, the local lipschitzness of h and g, and the boundedness of β, we get
So, F is locally Lipschitz. Thus, by the semigroup theory (see Pazy [20]), we obtain a local unique solution
To obtain a global unique solution, it suffices to show that \({\| U(t)\|_{\mathcal{H}}}\) is bounded independently of t. To this end, we multiply (1.6)1 by \({u_{t}}\) and integrate over Ω to get
On the account of assumption (A2) and remark number (2.1)1, we obtain
where
This completes the proof. □
4 Decay of the energy
In this section, we discuss the decay rates of the energy functional associated with problem (1.6). To achieve this, we state and prove several lemmas that will be fundamental in establishing the main result.
4.1 Technical lemmas
The energy functional associated with problem (1.6) is given by
Lemma 4.1
The energy functional defined in (4.1) satisfies
Proof
Multiplying (1.6) by \(u_{t}\) and integrating over Ω, we obtain
From (A3) we get that \({sg(s)>0}\) for all \({s\neq0}\). Thus, by using (A1), we obtain
We note here that the calculations are justified for regular solutions. However, the result in (4.3) remains true for a weak solution by a density argument. □
Define the functional
where m is a positive constant to be specified later.
Lemma 4.2
Assume that (A1)-(A3) hold. Then the functional F satisfies, along the solution of (1.6), the estimates
and
where C is a positive constant.
Proof
By using (1.6), definition (3.2), Lemma 4.1 and exploiting assumptions (A1) and (A2), direct differentiation gives
Next, we show that \({F\sim E}\). Using Young’s inequality and Lemma 2.2, we have
Also,
We choose \({m>0}\) large enough so that \({(m-1), (m-C_{*}) >0 }\) and arrive at
Thus, we get from (4.6) and (4.7) that
This completes the proof. □
Next, we choose \({0<\epsilon_{1}\leq\epsilon}\) so that
Then, for \({|s|\geq\epsilon_{1}}\), the function \({s\longmapsto \frac{|g(s)|}{|s|}}\) is continuous on compact intervals and thus attains its extrema. Thus, it follows from assumption (A3) that
As in [23], let us partition Ω as follows:
Lemma 4.3
The following inequalities hold for any \(\epsilon>0\) along the solution of (1.6):
and
where \({C_{*}}\) is the embedding constant defined in Lemma 2.2 and \({C_{\epsilon}}\) is a generic positive constant depending on ϵ.
Proof
For the first inequality (4.10), we use Young’s inequality and Lemma 2.2 to get
For the second inequality (4.11), we use Lemma 2.2 and Hölder’s inequality to obtain
Now, from (4.9)1 we observe that
Thus, with this in mind and Young’s inequality, we obtain
 □
Lemma 4.4
For ϵ small enough and two positive constants d, C, the functional defined by
satisfies, along the solution of (1.6), the estimate
and
Proof
Using Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3, direct computations give
That is,
This implies
We then choose ϵ small enough so that \({ (1-C\epsilon)>0}\) and obtain the result. It is easy to see that \({ L\sim E}\) since \({F\sim E}\). This completes the proof. □
4.2 Main decay result
Now, we state and prove our main decay result.
Theorem 4.1
Assume that (A1)-(A3) hold. Then there exist positive constants \(k_{1}\), \(k_{2}\), \(k_{3}\), \(\epsilon_{0}\) such that the solution of (1.6) satisfies
where
and \({M_{1}}\) is strictly decreasing on \((0,1]\) and \({\lim_{t\rightarrow0}M_{1}(t)=+\infty}\).
Proof
We have two cases as follows.
Case I. M is linear on \({(0,\epsilon]}\): Multiplying (4.15) by \(\beta(t)\) and using (4.9)2, we deduce that
By using (A1), we obtain
Let \({J_{1} = \beta L+ C E} \). Then \({J_{1} \sim E} \) since \({L \sim E} \), and we get from (4.20)
Simple integration of (4.21) over \({(0,t)}\) and using the fact that \({J_{1}\sim E}\) give
Case II. M is nonlinear on \({(0,\epsilon]}\). In this case, we consider the functional \({I(t)}\) defined by
We know that M is convex, so \(M^{-1}\) is concave. Thus, Jensen’s inequality yields
By using (4.9)2, we obtain
We multiply (4.15) by \(\beta(t)\) and use (4.23) to arrive at
This implies
since \({E'\leq0}\). Using (A1), we obtain
where
Let \({\epsilon_{0}<\epsilon}\), \({C_{0}>0}\) and define the functional
Let us note here that \({E(0)>0}\), otherwise \(E(t)=0\), \(\forall t\in\mathbb{R}^{+}\), and thus the theorem is verified since \({E'(t)\leq0}\). Now, since \({R_{0}\sim E}\) and \({E'\leq0}\), \({M'>0}\) (M is increasing), \({M''>0}\) (M is convex) on \((0,\epsilon]\), then \({R_{1}}\) satisfies the following:
and it follows from (4.26) that
Now, let \({M^{\ast}}\) be the convex conjugate of M in the sense of Young. Then
and \(M^{\ast}\) satisfies the generalised Young’s inequality
Next, we set \({X = M'(\epsilon_{0}\frac{E(t)}{E(0)})}\) and \({Y =M^{-1}(I(t))}\). By using Lemma 4.1, the fact that \(sg(s)\leq\min\lbrace\epsilon,G(\epsilon)\rbrace\), if \({|s|\leq\epsilon_{1}}\) and (4.28)-(4.30), we obtain
We choose \({C_{0}}\) large enough and \(\epsilon_{0}\) small enough such that
and arrive at
where \({M_{2}(t)=tM'(\epsilon_{0}t).}\) We have that
Thus, using the strict convexity of M on \({(0,\epsilon]}\), we get that \({M_{2}, M'_{2}>0}\) on \((0,1]\). It follows from (4.27) and (4.31) that the functional
satisfies
and
Inequality (4.33) implies that
where
Thus, integrating (4.33) over \((0,t)\) and noting that \({ M_{1}}\) is strictly decreasing on \((0,1]\) give
Combining (4.32) and (4.34), we get the result. This completes the proof. □
5 Examples
In this section, we illustrate our result with some examples. As in [21], let \({g_{0}\in C^{2} ( [0,+\infty) )}\) be a strictly increasing function such that \({g_{0}(0)=0}\), and for some positive constants \(c_{1}\), \(c_{2}\) and ϵ, the function g satisfies
Define the function
Then M is a \(C^{2}\)-strictly convex function on \((0,\epsilon]\) when \({g_{0}}\) is nonlinear and thus satisfies assumption (A3). We give some examples of \({g_{0}}\) such that g satisfies (5.1) near 0.
-
(1)
Let \({g_{0}(s)= ks}\), where k is a positive constant, then \({M(s)= ks}\) satisfies (A3), and we get
$${E(t)\leq ke^{-k_{1} \int_{0}^{t}\beta(s)\, ds},\quad \forall t\geq0.} $$ -
(2)
Let \({g_{0}(s) = \frac{1}{s}e^{-\frac{1}{s^{2}}}}\), then \({M(s)= e^{-\frac{2}{s}}}\) satisfies (A3) near 0 and
$${E(t)\leq k \biggl(\ln \biggl(k_{1} \int_{0}^{t} \beta(s)\, ds+ k_{2} \biggr) \biggr)^{-1},\quad \forall t\geq0.} $$ -
(3)
Let \({g_{0}(s) = e^{-\frac{1}{s}}}\), then \({M(s)= \sqrt{\frac{s}{2}} e^{-\sqrt{\frac{2}{s}}}}\) satisfies (A3) near 0, and we obtain
$${E(t)\leq k \biggl(\ln \biggl(k_{1} \int_{0}^{t} \beta(s)\, ds + k_{2} \biggr) \biggr)^{-2},\quad \forall t\geq0.} $$
6 Conclusion
This paper has been able to establish the well-posedness and decay estimate for a nonlinear plate equation with a partially hinged boundary condition. We also illustrated our result with some examples. This result is new for these types of problems, and it generalises many related problems in the literature.
References
Reddy, JN: Theory and Analysis of Elastic Plates and Shells. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)
Komornik, V: On the nonlinear boundary stabilization of Kirchhoff plates. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 1, 323-337 (1994)
Lagnese, J: Boundary Stabilization of Thin Plates. SIAM, Philadelphia (1989)
Lasiecka, I: Exponential decay rates for the solutions of Euler-Bernoulli moments only. J. Differ. Equ. 95, 169-182 (1992)
Lasiecka, I: Stabilization of wave and plate-like equation with nonlinear dissipation on the boundary. J. Differ. Equ. 79, 340-381 (1989)
Al-Gharabi, M, Messaoudi, SA: Existence and a general decay result for a plate equation with nonlinear damping and a logarithmic source term. J. Evol. Equ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-017-0392-4
Lu, Y: Uniform attractor for non-autonomous plate equation with a localized damping and a critical nonlinearity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, 1243-1254 (2008)
Ji, G, Lasiecka, I: Nonlinear boundary feedback stabilization for a semilinear Kirchhoff plate with dissipation acting only via moments-limiting behavior. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 229, 452-479 (1999)
Ferrero, A, Gazzola, F: A partially hinged rectangular plate as a model for suspension bridges. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35(12), 5879-5908 (2015)
Al-Gwaiz, M, Benci, V, Gazzola, F: Bending and stretching energies in a rectangular plate modeling suspension bridges. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 106, 18-34 (2014)
Wang, Y: Finite time blow-up and global solutions for fourth order damped wave equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 418(2), 713-733 (2014)
Messaoudi, SA, Mukiawa, SE: Existence and decay of solutions to a viscoelastic plate equation. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2016, 22 (2016)
Messaoudi, SA, Mukiawa, SE, Enyi, CD: Finite dimensional global attractor for a suspension bridge problem with delay. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 354, 808-824 (2016)
Messaoudi, SA, Bonfoh, A, Mukiawa, SE, Enyi, CD: The global attractor for a suspension bridge with memory and partially hinged boundary conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 97, 159-172 (2017)
Messaoudi, SA, Mukiawa, SE: A Suspension Bridge Problem: Existence and Stability. Mathematics Across Contemporary Sciences. Springer, Cham (2016)
Mukiawa, SE: Asymptotic behaviour of a suspension bridge problem. Arab J. Math. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmsc.2017.07.002
Gazzola, F, Wang, Y: Modeling suspension bridges through the Von Karman quasilinear plate equations. In: Contributions to Nonlinear Differential Equations and Systems. A Tribute to Djairo Guedes de Figueiredo on Occasion of His 80th Birthday. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, pp. 269-297 (2015)
Berchio, E, Ferrero, A, Gazzola, F: Structural instability of nonlinear plates modelling suspension bridges: mathematical answers to some long-standing questions. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 28, 91-125 (2016)
Gazzola, F: Mathematical Models for Suspension Bridges: Nonlinear Structural Instability. Modeling, Simulation and Applications, vol. 15. Springer, Berlin (2015)
Pazzy, A: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Application to PDE. Appl. Math. Sci., vol. 44. Springer, New York (1983)
Mustafa, MI, Messaoudi, SA: General energy decay rates for weakly damped wave equation. Commun. Math. Anal. 9(2), 67-76 (2010)
Lasiecka, I, Tataru, D: Uniform boundary stabilization of semilinear wave equation with nonlinear boundary damping. Differ. Integral Equ. 8, 507-533 (1993)
Komornik, V: Exact Controllability and Stabilization. The Multiplier Method. Masson-Wiley, Paris (1994)
Acknowledgements
The author would like to appreciate anonymous refferees for their careful reading and very useful comments. The continuous support of the University of Hafr Al Batin is also appreciated.
Funding
There is no funding budget for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Mukiawa, S.E. Existence and general decay estimate for a nonlinear plate problem. Bound Value Probl 2018, 11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-018-0931-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-018-0931-0