- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Quasilinear Schrödinger equations with superlinear terms describing the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain
Boundary Value Problems volume 2024, Article number: 31 (2024)
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a model problem arising from a classical planar Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain:
where \(2< p<2^{*}\), \(c>0\) and \(N\geq 3\). By the cutoff technique, the change of variables and the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate, we prove that there exists \(c_{0}>0\), such that for any \(c>c_{0}\) this problem admits a positive solution. Here, in contrast to the Morse iteration method, we construct the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate of the solution. In particular, we give the specific expression of \(c_{0}\).
1 Introduction
This paper is concerned with the existence of standing-wave solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations of the form
where \(W(x)\) is a given potential, κ is a real constant, and ρ, l are real functions of essentially pure power forms. Quasilinear equations of the form (1.1) appear more naturally in mathematical physics and have been derived as models of several physical phenomena corresponding to various types of l. For instance, the case of \(l(s)=s\) is used for the superfluid film equation in plasma physics [1]. In the case \(l(s)=(1+s)^{\frac{1}{2}}\), (1.1) models the self-channeling of a high-power ultrashort-wavelength laser in matter [2]. If \(l(s)=(1-s)^{\frac{1}{2}}\), (1.1) also appears in the theory of the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain. We refer to [3–6] and their references for more details on this subject.
Here, our special interest is in the existence of standing-wave solutions, that is, solutions of type \(\phi (x,t)=\exp (i F t)u(x)\), where \(F\in \mathbb{R}\) and \(u>0\) is a real function. It is well known that ϕ satisfies (1.1) if and only if the function u solves the following equation of the elliptic type:
where \(V(x)=W(x)+F\) is the new potential function. If we let \(l(s)=(1-s)^{\frac{1}{2}}\), \(\rho (s)=\varepsilon '(1-s)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\) and \(V(x)=\lambda +\varepsilon '\), we obtain the equation
which originally appears in the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain. In the mathematical literature, few results are known on (1.3). In a one-dimensional space, Brüll et al. [7] studied the ground states u for (1.3) with \(\lim_{|x|\rightarrow \infty}u(x)=0\). For a higher-dimensional space, in [4], Takeno and Homma constructed the expression of the solution to boundary value problems for second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations.
More recently, Wang in [8] considered the following quasilinear Schrödinger equation:
He generalized the result given in [7] to a three-dimensional space.
The main objective of the present paper is to study the following quasilinear Schrödinger equation
that is, the case \(l(s)=(1-s)^{\frac{1}{2}}\), \(\rho (s)=c s^{\frac{p-2}{2}}\). To the best of our knowledge, up to now, there are no results for (1.5) on \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\) for the superlinear case.
We observe that the critical point of the functional
solves the Euler–Lagrange equation (1.5). From the variational point of view, there exist two difficulties to overcome for this functional (1.6). One is that the functional is not well defined in \(H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\). The other is how to guarantee the positiveness of the principle part. In order to overcome these two difficulties, we will focus on the following functional:
where \(\kappa >0\) is a constant. Obviously, if \(u_{\kappa}\) is a critical point of \(I_{0}(u)\), then \(u_{\kappa}\) solves the equation
For the solution \(u_{\kappa}\) of (1.8), we rescale \(u_{\kappa}=\kappa ^{-\frac{1}{2}}u\). Then, u satisfies (1.5). Furthermore, according to [9], (1.8) can be reformulated as the following problems of the form:
where \(g(t)=\sqrt{1-\frac{\kappa t^{2}}{1-\kappa t^{2}}}\). It is obvious that \(g(t)\) is a singular function. Now, to avoid the singularity, by using the cutoff technique introduced in [8], we continuously extend the domain of the function \(g(t)\) to all of \([0,+\infty )\). More precisely, we consider the function
where \(\theta >\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\). Clearly, \(g_{\kappa}(t)\in C^{1}([0,+\infty ),[0,+\infty ))\) and \(g_{\kappa}(t)\) decreases in \([0,+\infty )\). Substituting this form for \(g(t)\) in (1.9), we obtain the following Schrödinger equation:
and the critical point of the functional
satisfies the equation (1.11).
Here, the previously defined \(g_{\kappa}(t)\) is obviously bounded satisfying \(0< a_{1}\leq g_{\kappa}(t)\leq 1\), where \(a_{1}=\frac{\sqrt{\theta ^{2}-5\theta +2}}{\theta -1}\). Hence, the functional \(I_{\kappa}(u)\) is regular and nonsmooth. For the existence and the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate of the critical point of the functional (1.12), we follow the ideas shown in [9, 10] and make the change of variables:
Thus, by using the change of variable (1.13), the nonsmooth functional \(I_{\kappa}(u)\) can be transformed into a smooth functional
and the quasilinear problem (1.11) is reformulated as a semilinear equation
Consequently, in order to find the nontrivial solutions of (1.11), it suffices to show the existence of the nontrivial solutions of (1.15). We also observe that if \(v_{\kappa}\) is a critical point of the functional \(J_{\kappa}(v)\), then \(u_{\kappa}=G^{-1}_{\kappa}(v_{\kappa})\) is a solution of the problem (1.11). Hence, in this way we only need to discuss the existence of the critical point \(v_{\kappa}\) of the smooth functional \(J_{\kappa}(v)\) by the critical-point theory. In what follows, we assume that
only as a convenience. If we can prove that the critical point \(u_{\kappa}\) of the functional (1.12) satisfies
then this function \(u_{\kappa}\) is good for what we want since \(g_{\kappa}(u)=g(u)=\sqrt{1-\frac{\kappa t^{2}}{1-\kappa t^{2}}}\) under this situation. That is, in this case, the functional (1.12) is exactly the functional (1.7) and thus \(u_{\kappa}\) is a weak solution of equations (1.8) and (1.9). Then, the function
is the solution of (1.5).
Based on the description in the previous paragraph, the key step is to construct the estimate of \(|v_{\kappa}|_{\infty}\). Then, we can achieve the expression of \(c_{0}\) by the inequality (1.16) such that, if \(c>c_{0}\), (1.16) holds and so \(u=c^{-\frac{1}{p-2}}u_{\kappa}\) solves the equation (1.5). To this aim, according to the arguments in [11], we first obtain the \(H^{1}\) estimate of \(v_{\kappa}\). Then, combining this \(H^{1}\) estimate, we construct the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate \(|v_{\kappa}|_{\infty}\). We must point out explicitly that, instead of the Morse iteration method used in [11], we use the method of converting integral inequalities into differential inequalities, which can be found in Lemma 5.1 on p. 71 in Ladyzhenskaya and Ural’tseva [12] and is used to study the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate of the nonlinear elliptic equations on bounded domains, to construct the estimate of \(|v_{\kappa}|_{\infty}\). Moreover, all the constants in this estimate are well known.
Throughout this paper, we assume the potential \(V(x)\in C^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N},\mathbb{R})\) satisfies
- \((V_{1})\):
-
\(V(x)\geq V_{0}>0\);
- \((V_{2})\):
-
\(V(x)\leq V_{\infty}\)
and we make use of the following notations: Let X be the completion of the space \(C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) with respect to the norm
By \((V_{1})\) and \((V_{2})\), X is equivalent to \(H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\). The symbols \(|u|_{q}\) and \(|u|_{\infty}\) are used for the norm of the space \(L^{q}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) with \(2 \leq q < +\infty \) and \(q=\infty \), respectively.
The corresponding result is as follows:
Theorem 1.1
For all \(\theta >\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\), let
where \(b=(p-2)(1+2^{*}-p+\frac{2}{2^{*}-p})\), \(p> 2\), \(\theta _{1}^{2}=\frac{\theta ^{2}-5\theta +2}{(\theta -1)^{2}}\), \(C_{N}\) is the best Sobolev constant and \(v_{1}\) is the least energy solution of the functional
Then, for \(c>c_{0}\), the quasilinear problem (1.5) admits a solution u under the conditions \((V_{1})\) and \((V_{2})\).
Furthermore, we obtain a Pohozaev identity for this class of quasilinear equations, which is used to prove the nonexistence results of solution for (1.5), while we justify that \(p=2^{*}\) is the critical exponent for equation (1.5).
Theorem 1.2
Suppose \(p\geq 2^{*}\), \(|u|\leq u_{0}<1\) for some \(u_{0}\) and \(V(x)\) satisfies \(2V(x)+x\cdot \nabla V(x)\geq 0\) for all \(x\in \mathbb{R}^{N}\). If \(u\in C^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) is a classical solution of (1.5), then \(u\equiv 0\).
2 The modified problem
In this section, we consider the following equation
If we rescale the solution of (2.1) \(u_{\kappa}=\kappa ^{-\frac{1}{2}}u\), then u solves
In what follows, we will establish a positive solution of (2.1). To this aim, we first introduce \(g_{\kappa}(t)\) defined in (1.10) and focus on the following Schrödinger equation:
We will prove that there exists a positive solution \(u_{\kappa}\) for (2.3) with \(|u_{\kappa}|\leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{\theta \kappa}}\). Direct calculation shows that \(u_{\kappa}\) is indeed a solution of (2.1) and thus \(\sqrt{\kappa}u_{\kappa}\) is a solution of (2.2).
It is well known that (2.3) is the Euler–Lagrange equation associated with the energy functional
Thus, by using the change of variable (1.13) and recalling our assumption \(c\kappa ^{\frac{p-2}{2}}=1\), the nonsmooth functional \(I_{\kappa}(u)\) can be transformed into a smooth functional
and the quasilinear problem (2.3) is reformulated as a semilinear equation
Therefore, in order to find the positive solution of (2.3), it suffices to study the solutions of (2.6) via the mountain-pass theorem. Thus, we need the following lemma to show some properties of the inverse function \(G^{-1}_{\kappa}(t)\).
Lemma 2.1
For any \(\theta >\frac{5+\sqrt{17}}{2}\), we have
-
(1).
\(\theta _{1}:=\frac{\sqrt{\theta ^{2}-5\theta +2}}{\theta -1}< g_{ \kappa}(t)\leq 1\) for all \(t\geq 0\);
-
(2).
\(\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\frac{G_{\kappa}^{-1}(t)}{t}=1\);
-
(3).
\(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty}\frac{G_{\kappa}^{-1}(t)}{t}= \frac{1}{\theta _{1}}\);
-
(4).
\(t\leq G_{\kappa}^{-1}(t)\leq \frac{1}{\theta _{1}}t\) for all \(t\geq 0\);
-
(5).
\(-\frac{\theta}{(\theta -1)(\theta -2)}\leq \frac{t}{g_{\kappa}(t)}g_{ \kappa}'(t)\leq 0\) for all \(t\geq 0\).
Proof
This lemma is mainly from [8], here the proof is provided to readers only as a convenience. By the definition of \(g_{\kappa}(t)\) and L’Hospital’s rule, properties (1)–(3) are obvious. By (1), for \(t>0\), we have \(\theta _{1}t\leq G_{\kappa}(t)\leq g_{\kappa}(0)t\), which implies (4). Now, we prove the property (5). If \(t<\frac{1}{\sqrt{\theta \kappa}}\), we have
by direct computation. If \(t\geq \frac{1}{\sqrt{\theta \kappa}}\), we also have
□
In the following lemma, we establish the geometric hypotheses of the mountain-pass theorem.
Lemma 2.2
There exist \(\rho _{0}\), \(a_{0}\), such that \(J_{\kappa}(v)\geq a_{0}\) for \(\|v\|=\rho _{0}\). Moreover, there exists \(e\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) such that \(J_{\kappa}(e)<0\).
Proof
By Lemma 2.1-(4) and Sobolev embedding, we have
Therefore, by choosing \(\rho _{0}\) small, we know that
and, hence,
In order to prove the existence of \(e\in \mathbb{R}^{N}\) such that \(J_{\kappa}(e)<0\), we fix \(\psi \in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N},[0,1])\) with \(\operatorname{supp}\phi =\bar{B}_{1}\). Thus, by Lemma 2.1-(4), we obtain
Since \(p>2\), it follows that \(J_{\kappa}(t\phi )\rightarrow -\infty \) as \(t\rightarrow \infty \). Then, the result follows considering \(e=t\phi \) for t large enough. □
In consequence of Lemma 2.2, we can apply the mountain-pass theorem without the (PS)-condition found in [13] to obtain a \(\mbox{(PS)}_{c_{\kappa}}\) sequence \(\{v_{n} \}\), where \(c_{\kappa}\) is the well-known mountain-pass level associated with the function \(J_{\kappa}\), that is,
Lemma 2.3
The sequence \(\{v_{n} \}\) is bounded.
Proof
As \(\{v_{n} \}\subset H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) is a Palais–Smale sequence, we know that
Moreover, for any \(\phi \in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), we have \(J'_{\kappa}(v_{n})\phi =o(1)\|\phi \|\), that is,
Now, fixing \(\phi =G_{\kappa}^{-1}(v_{n})g_{\kappa}(G^{-1}_{\kappa}(v_{n}))\), it follows from Lemma 2.1-(5) that
On the other hand, using Lemma 2.1-(1) and (4), we have
Combining (2.9) and (2.10), we see that \(\phi \in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) with \(\|\phi \|\leq \theta _{1}^{-2}\|v_{n}\|\). Thus, using \(\phi =G_{\kappa}^{-1}(v_{n})g_{\kappa}(G^{-1}_{\kappa}(v_{n}))\) as a test function in (2.8), we derive that
Therefore, combining (2.7), (2.8), and (2.11), we infer the inequality
which shows the boundedness of \(\{v_{n} \}\). □
Since \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a bounded sequence in \(H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), there exist \(v_{\kappa}\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) and a subsequence of \(\{v_{n} \}\), still denoted by itself, such that
and
Proposition 2.1
The weak limit of \(v_{\kappa}\) of \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a nontrivial critical point of \(J_{\kappa}\) and \(J_{\kappa}(v_{\kappa})\leq c_{\kappa}\).
Proof
To begin with, we first prove that \(v_{\kappa}\) is a weak solution. To this aim, we must prove that
that is,
Since \(C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) is dense in \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\), we will show the last equality only for \(\phi \in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\).
In what follows, for each \(R>0\), we consider \(\phi _{R}\in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) verifying
and
By [13], there is \(z\in L^{q}(B_{2R}(0))\) such that
Consequently,
and
Moreover, by Lemma 2.1-(1) and (4),
and
Hence, by the Lebesgue Dominate Theorem, we have
and
The same type of arguments shows the limits below
and
Now, the above limits combined with \(J'_{\kappa}(v_{n})(v_{n}\phi )=o_{n}(1)\) and \(J'_{\kappa}(v_{n})(v_{\kappa}\phi )=o_{n}(1)\) give
and then it follows that
Recalling that R is arbitrary and \(v_{n}\rightarrow v_{\kappa}\) in \(L^{2}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), we are able to conclude the \(v_{n}\rightarrow v_{\kappa}\) in \(H^{1}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\). Thereby,
Since \(J'_{\kappa}(v_{n})\phi =o_{n}(1)\), the last limit yields \(J'_{\kappa}(v_{\kappa})\phi =0\) for all \(\phi \in C_{0}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), that is, \(v_{\kappa}\) is a critical point for \(J_{\kappa}\).
Now, we will show that \(v_{\kappa}\not \equiv 0\). To this aim, we suppose that \(v_{\kappa}=0\) and claim that in this case \(\{v_{n} \}\) is also a Palais–Smale sequence for functional \(J_{\kappa,\infty}:H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) defined by
On the other hand, we know that \(V(x)\rightarrow V_{\infty}\) as \(|x|\rightarrow \infty \), \(|G^{-1}_{\kappa}(s)|\leq \theta _{1}^{-1}|s|\) and \(v_{n}\rightarrow 0\) in \(L_{\mathrm{loc}}^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), therefore
Moreover, as \(\frac{|G^{-1}(s)|}{g(G^{-1}(s))}\leq \theta _{1}^{-1}|s|\), it follows that
Next, we claim that for all \(R>0\), the vanishing
cannot occur. Suppose, by contradiction, that (2.19) occurs, then by Lions’ compactness lemma [14], \(v_{n}\rightarrow 0\) in \(L^{q}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) for any \(q\in (2,2^{*})\). Jointly with Lemma 2.1, we derive that
and
Moreover, using the limits below
we also have
Therefore,
which is a contradiction, since \(c_{\kappa}\geq a_{0}>0\).
Thus, \(\{v_{n} \}\) does not vanish and there exist α, \(R>0\) and \(\{y_{n} \}\subset \mathbb{R}^{N}\) verifying
Setting \(\tilde{v}_{n}=v_{n}(x+y_{n})\) and using that \(\{v_{n} \}\) is a Palais–Smale sequence for \(J_{\kappa,\infty}\), we know that \(\{\tilde{v}_{n} \}\) is also a Palais–Smale sequence for \(J_{\kappa,\infty}\). Therefore, there is \(\tilde{v}_{\kappa}\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) such that
Furthermore, by (2.20), we also have \(\tilde{v}_{\kappa}\neq 0\). Henceforward, without loss of generality, we assume that
The last limit, together with Fatous’ Lemma, lead to
which shows that \(J_{\kappa,\infty}(\tilde{v}_{\kappa})\leq c_{\kappa}\). Now, following the arguments given in [15], if we define
and \(\gamma (t)=\tilde{v}_{\kappa,t}(x)\), we achieve
and \(J_{\kappa,\infty}(\gamma (L))<0\) for sufficiently large \(L>1\). Then, by the definition of \(c_{\kappa}\), there holds
which is a contradiction. Thereby, \(v_{\kappa}\) is a nontrivial critical point for \(J_{\kappa}\). Moreover, repeating the same type of arguments explored in (2.21), we have that \(J_{\kappa}(v_{\kappa})\leq c_{\kappa}\). □
3 \(L^{\infty}\) estimate
This section is mainly to show the \(L^{\infty}\) estimate of the function \(v_{\kappa}=G_{\kappa}(u_{\kappa})\) obtained in Proposition 2.1. To this aim, we need the following fact first to show the \(H^{1}\) estimate of \(v_{\kappa}\).
Lemma 3.1
The solution \(v_{\kappa}\) satisfies \(\|v_{\kappa}\|^{2}\leq \frac{2pc_{\kappa}}{p-2}\).
Proof
As \(v_{\kappa}\) is a critical point of \(J_{\kappa}\), it follows that
Then, by Lemma 2.1-(4),
which implies that
□
From now on, we consider the functional
and we denote \(c_{\infty}\) the mountain-pass level associated with \(J_{\infty}\), which is independent of κ. Since \(J_{\kappa}(v)\leq J_{\infty}(v)\), we deduce that \(c_{\kappa}\leq c_{\infty}\). Consequently, by Lemma 3.1, the solution \(v_{\kappa}\) must satisfy the estimate
Now, we construct the estimate of \(|v_{\kappa}|_{\infty}\) via the following two lemmas.
Lemma 3.2
The solution \(v_{\kappa}\) of the semilinear equation (2.6) satisfies
where \(A_{l}= \{x\in \mathbb{R}^{N}: v_{\kappa}(x)>l \}\), \(\alpha =|v_{\kappa}|_{2^{*}}\), \(a=1-\frac{p}{2^{*}}\), and \(|A_{l}|\) denotes the Lebesgue measure of the set \(A_{l}\).
Proof
For any \(\phi \in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), the solution \(v_{\kappa}\) of (2.6) satisfies
By taking \(\phi =(v_{\kappa}-l)^{+}\) as a test function in (3.2) with \(l>0\), applying Lemma 2.1-(1) and (4), we have
Combining the Sobolev inequality
and the Minkowski inequality, we have
Moreover, by the Hölder inequality, we have
that is,
If we take \(l_{0}=\alpha (2 C_{N}^{2}\theta _{1}^{-p} \alpha ^{p-2})^{ \frac{1}{2^{*}-p}} \), we have
Consequently, combining (3.4) and (3.6), we conclude, if \(l>l_{0}\), that
Thus, jointly with
we finally have
□
Lemma 3.3
The solution \(v_{\kappa}\) of the semilinear equation (2.6) has the following estimate:
Proof
Inspired by Lemma 5.1 of [12], we consider the function
For this function, we have \(-f'(l)=|A_{l}|\). Therefore, (3.8) can be rewritten as
If we integrate this inequality with respect to l from \(l_{0}\) to \(l_{\max}:=|v_{\kappa}|_{\infty}\), we obtain
Moreover, jointly with (3.5), recalling that \(l_{0}=\alpha (2 C_{N}^{2}\theta _{1}^{-p} \alpha ^{p-2})^{ \frac{1}{2^{*}-p}}\), we infer that
and then, by (3.8),
Therefore, we have
which implies the desired inequality
where \(b_{1}=1+\frac{1}{a}+2^{*}-p\). □
4 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Proof of Theorem 1.1
A direct consequence of Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 3.3 is that \(v_{\kappa}=G_{\kappa}(u_{\kappa})\) solves (1.15) and has the estimate
Combining Lemma 2.1-(4) and (3.1), we infer that
Now, to ensure that
we select
Thus, inequality (4.3) can be satisfied if only \(c>c_{0}\). Obviously, equation (1.11) is indeed equation (1.8) under the situation of \(|u_{\kappa}|_{\infty}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{\theta \kappa}}\). Hence, \(u_{\kappa}\) solves (1.8) and then \(u=\kappa ^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{\kappa}=c^{-\frac{1}{p-2}}u_{\kappa}\) is the solution of (1.5). Thus, we complete the proof. □
5 Proof of Theorem 1.2
In this section, we will prove the nonexistence results for equation (1.5). To this aim, we first show a Pohozaev identity and we justify that the critical exponent for this class of problems is 2∗.
Lemma 5.1
(Pohozaev identity). Suppose \(F(x,u,r)\in C^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N}\times \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}^{N})\) satisfies
where
and
Then, if \(F(x,u,\nabla u)\), \(x\cdot F_{x}(x,u,\nabla u)\), and \(F_{r}(x,u,\nabla u)\cdot \nabla u\in L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\), there holds the following identity
We omit the proof of this lemma, since it can be mainly found in [16].
To present the Pohozaev identity associated to (1.5), we rewrite equation (1.5) as
Thus, the integrands in (5.2) can be expressed as
and
Moreover, if \(|u|\leq u_{0}<1\), we have
Consequently, we achieve the following lemma based on Lemma 5.1 under the conditions \(|\nabla u|^{2}\), \(V(x)u^{2}\), \((x\cdot \nabla V(x))u^{2}\), and \(u^{p}\in L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\).
Lemma 5.2
Suppose that \(u\in C^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\) is a solution of (1.5) and \(|u|\leq u_{0}<1\). Then,
if \(|\nabla u|^{2}\), \(V(x)u^{2}\), \((x\cdot \nabla V(x))u^{2}\), and \(u^{p}\in L^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N})\).
Now, we show the nonexistence result of the solution for (1.5).
Proof of Theorem 1.2
On the one hand, the Pohozaev identity associated to (1.5) is
On the other hand, multiplying (5.3) by u and integrating it, we have
Combining (5.5) and (5.6), it follows that
Thus, if \(p\geq 2^{*}\) and \(2V(x)+(x\cdot \nabla V(x))\geq 0\), we conclude that
which implies that \(u=0\) and we complete the proof of Theorem 1.2. □
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
References
Kurihura, S.: Large-amplitude quasi-solitons in superfluid films. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50, 3262–3267 (1981)
Laedke, E.W., Spatschek, K.H., Stenflo, L.: Evolution theorem for a class of perturbed envelope soliton solutions. J. Math. Phys. 24, 2764–2767 (1983)
Brüll, L.: On solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations in higher dimensions. Appl. Anal. 22, 213–225 (1986)
Takeno, S., Homma, S.: Classical planar Heisenberg ferromagnet, complex scalar field and nonlinear excitations. Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 172–189 (1981)
Quispel, G.R.W., Capel, H.W.: Equation of motion for the Heisenberg spin chain. Phys. A. 110, 41–80 (1982)
Bass, F.G., Nasanov, N.N.: Nonlinear electromagnetic spin waves. Phys. Rep. 189, 165–223 (1990)
Brüll, L., Lange, H., de Jager, E.: Stationary, oscillatory and solitary waves type solutions of singular nonlinear Schödinger equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 8, 559–575 (1986)
Wang, Y.J.: Solitary solutions for a class of Schödinger equations in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 67, 88 (2016)
Shen, Y.T., Wang, Y.J.: Soliton solutions for generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 80, 194–201 (2013)
Shen, Y.T., Guo, X.K.: The positive solution of degenerate variational problems and degenerate elliptic equations. Chin. J. Contemp. Math. 14, 157–166 (1993)
Alves, C.O., Wang, Y.J., Shen, Y.T.: Soliton solutions for a calss of quasilinear Schrödinger equations with a parameter. J. Differ. Equ. 259, 318–343 (2015)
Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Ural’tseva, N.N.: Linear and Quasilinaer Elliptic Equations. Academic (1968)
Willem, M.: Minimax Theorems. Birkhäuser, Basel (1996)
Lions, P.L.: The concentration compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The local compact case. Part I and II. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire, 109–145, 1399-1418 (1984)
Jeanjean, L., Tanake, K.: A remark on least energy solutions in \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 131, 2399–2408 (2003)
Pucci, P., Serrin, J.: A general variational identity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 35(3), 681–703 (1986)
Funding
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [grant number 12271179] and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [grant number 2020A1515010338].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yongkuan Cheng and Yaotian Shen designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, Y., Shen, Y. Quasilinear Schrödinger equations with superlinear terms describing the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain. Bound Value Probl 2024, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-024-01836-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-024-01836-4