- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On a new version of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequality based on proportional Caputo-hybrid operator
Boundary Value Problems volume 2024, Article number: 44 (2024)
Abstract
In mathematics and the applied sciences, as a very useful tool, fractional calculus is a basic concept. Furthermore, in many areas of mathematics, it is better to use a new hybrid fractional operator, which combines the proportional and Caputo operators. So we concentrate on the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator because of its numerous applications. In this research, we introduce a novel extension of the Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for proportional Caputo-hybrid operator and establish an identity. Then, taking into account this novel generalized identity, we develop some integral inequalities associated with the left-side of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for proportional Caputo-hybrid operator. Moreover, to illustrate the newly established inequalities, we give some examples with the help of graphs.
1 Introduction
Convex analysis is a field of study that has found its application in various domains of optimization theory, energy systems, engineering applications, and physics. This analysis holds a significant position in these areas of mathematics, in particular, in the study of inequalities. The most well-known inequality in convex theory is the Hermite–Hadamard inequality. This inequality provided by Hermite and Hadamard [11, 16] is expressed as follows:
where \(f:I\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is a convex function on the interval I of real numbers, and \(a,b\in I\) with \(a< b\). If f is concave, then both inequalities in the statement hold in the reverse direction.
Upper and lower bounds for the average value of a convex function on a compact interval are provided by the Hermite–Hadamard inequality. Numerous disciplines, including integral calculus, probability theory, statistics, optimization, and number theory, use this inequality. It is a valuable tool for tackling physical problems that demand the computation of function averages. With the emergence of new problems, its applications continue to expand, making it as an effective tool for solving a wide range of mathematical problems. Moreover, the Hermite–Hadamard inequality is characterized by the trapezoidal and midpoint inequalities on its right and left parts. Researchers’ studies have concentrated on these kinds of inequality. Trapezoid-type inequalities for the case of convex functions were first presented by Dragomir and Agarwal [10], whereas midpoint-type inequalities for the case of convex functions were first established by Kırmacı [22]. Following the establishment of these inequalities, there has been considerable research activity in this field [2, 7, 18].
Fractional calculus has a strong historical basis. The beginnings can be traced back to the correspondence between Leibniz and L’Hôpital. With the aid of this calculus, we can more precisely characterize the behavior of complex systems, particularly those displaying noninteger-order dynamics. It extends the notions of standard calculus due to the presence of fractional orders. In recent times, fractional calculus is a developing branch of mathematics, which plays a significant role in capturing the dynamics of intricate systems across diverse science because of the new fractional integral and derivative such as Caputo–Fabrizio [8], Atangana–Baleanu [4], tempered [27], etc.
A fundamental class of fractional integral operators is the Riemann–Liouville integral operators [21].
Definition 1
For \(f\in L_{1}[a,b]\), the Riemann–Liouville integrals of order \(\alpha >0\) are given by
and
where Γ is the gamma function, and \(J_{a+}^{0}f(x)=J_{b-}^{0}f(x)=f(x)\). Obviously, the Riemann–Liouville integrals will be equal to classical integrals for \(\alpha =1\).
Sarıkaya et al. [30] and Iqbal et al. [19] obtained many fractional midpoint- and trapezoid-type inequalities for convex functions, respectively. Next, Sarıkaya and Yıldırım [31] derived a distinct expression of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality with the help of fractional integrals in the following form.
Theorem 1
Let \(f\in L_{1}[a,b]\) be a convex function on \([a,b]\). Then we have the following inequalities for fractional integrals:
for \(\alpha >0\).
For other results on fractional integral inequalities, see [6, 12, 14, 24, 25, 33] and references therein.
Another important definition in fractional analysis is the following [28]:
Definition 2
Let \(\alpha >0\) and \(\alpha \notin \{ 1,2,\ldots \} \), \(n=[\alpha ]+1 \), and let \(f\in AC^{n}[a,b]\) denote the space of functions having n absolutely continuous derivatives. The left-sided and right-sided Caputo fractional derivatives of order α are defined as follows:
and
If \(\alpha =n\in \{ 1,2,3,\ldots \} \) and the usual nth-order derivative \(f^{(n)}(x) \) exists, then the Caputo fractional derivative \(^{C}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\,f(x)\) coincides with \(f^{(n)}(x)\), whereas \(^{C}D_{b^{-}}^{\alpha }\,f(x)\) coincides with the latter up to a constant multiplier \((-1)^{n}\). For \(n=1\) and \(\alpha =0\), we have \({}^{C}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\,f(x)={}^{C}D_{b^{-}}^{\alpha }\,f(x)=f(x)\).
The Caputo derivative is defined as the application of a fractional integral to the standard derivative of a function, whereas the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative is obtained by differentiating the fractional integral of a function concerning its independent variable of order n. The Caputo fractional derivative necessitates more suitable initial conditions in contrast to the conventional Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative considering fractional differential equations [9]. Besides, the operator of a proportional derivative denoted as \({}^{P}D_{\alpha }f(t)\) is given by [3]
Under certain assumptions, \(K_{1}\) and \(K_{0}\) are functions of \(\alpha \in [0,1]\) and \(t\in \mathbb{R}\mathbbm{;}\) also, the function f is differentiable with respect to \(t\in \mathbb{R}\). It is related to the wide and expanding area of conformable derivatives. Additionally, in the realm of control theory, the utilization of this operator is common. Thus, studying the Caputo and proportional derivatives has become much more important in recent years [1, 13, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 32].
The definition provided by Baleanu et al. [5] combines the notions of proportional and Caputo derivatives in a novel way to create a hybrid fractional operator that can be expressed as a linear combination of Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives.
Definition 3
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a differentiable function on \(I^{\circ }\), and let f, \(f^{\prime }\) be locally in \(L_{1}(I)\). Then the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator may be defined as follows:
where \(\alpha \in {}[ 0,1]\), and \(K_{1}\) and \(K_{0}\) are functions satisfying the following conditions:
Sarıkaya [29] suggested a novel concept based on Definition 3 via different functions \(K_{1}\) and \(K_{0}\). They also provided the Hermite–Hadamard inequality using the following:
Definition 4
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a differentiable function on \(I^{\circ }\) such that f, \(f^{\prime }\in L_{1}(I)\). The left- and right-sided proportional Caputo-hybrid operators of order α are defined, respectively, as follows:
and
where \(\alpha \in {}[ 0,1]\), and \(K_{0}(\alpha ,\tau )=(1-\alpha )^{2}\tau ^{1-\alpha }\) and \(K_{1}(\alpha ,\tau )=\alpha ^{2}\tau ^{\alpha } \).
Theorem 2
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a differentiable function on \(I^{\circ }\), the interior of the interval I, where \(a,b\in I^{\circ }\) with \(a< b\), and let f and \(f^{\prime }\) be convex functions on I. Then we have the following inequalities:
This work aims to analyze analogs of the Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities concerning Riemann integrals for the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator. For this, we first give a Hermite–Hadamard inequality in different presentation using the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator as defined by Sarıkaya [29]. Moreover, we present an identity for the first part of this inequality, called the midpoint side. To establish different midpoint-type inequalities, this identity is required. Furthermore, we provide several examples supported to demonstrate the established inequalities by graphical representations. Under appropriate assumptions on α, these conclusions expand and generalize the inequalities discovered in earlier works.
2 Main results
In this section, firstly, differently from the literature, we obtain a Hermite–Hadamard inequality for the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator as follows.
Theorem 3
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a differentiable function on \(I^{o}\), where \(a,b\in I^{o}\) satisfy \(a< b\), and let f and \(f^{\prime }\) be convex functions on I. Then we have the following inequalities:
Proof
Since f and \(f^{\prime }\) are convex functions on \([a,b]\), we have
and
Then, multiplying these expressions by \(\alpha ^{2}(b-a)^{\alpha }2^{-\alpha }\) and \((1-\alpha )^{2}(b-a)^{1-\alpha }2^{\alpha -1}t^{1-2\alpha }\), respectively, we obtain
and
Placing these two statements side by side and summing them up yield
Integrating both sides of the inequality with respect to \(t\in [0,1]\), we deduce that
Using a variable substitution, we arrive at
Therefore the left side of inequality (2) is demonstrated. To verify the second side of (2), by the convexity of f and \(f^{\prime }\) on \([a,b]\), we have
and
Multiplying these two expressions by \(\alpha ^{2}(b-a)^{\alpha }2^{-\alpha }\) and \((1-\alpha )^{2}(b-a)^{1-\alpha }2^{\alpha -1}t^{1-2\alpha }\), we obtain
and
Adding these two inequalities, we get
Integrating both sides of the inequality over \(t\in [0,1]\), we get
Now a change of variable leads us to
Consequently, we achieve the required second side of inequality (2). □
Remark 1
In the particular case where α tends to 1 in Theorem 3, we get inequality (1). Therefore we see that inequality (2) is an extension of classical Hermite–Hadamard inequality.
Now we present an example illustrating our theorem.
Example 1
Let us consider the function \(f:[1,2]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) given by \(f(x) =x^{3}\). Then the left- and right-hand sides of (2) are
Furthermore, from the equalities
and
it follows that
Thus, in view of (2), we obtain the inequality
Inequality (3) is illustrated in Fig. 1.
The following lemma is essential for demonstrating other our main results.
Lemma 1
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a twice differentiable function on \(I^{o}\), where \(a,b\in I^{o}\) satisfy \(a< b\), and let \(f, f^{\prime },f^{\prime \prime }\in L_{1}[a,b]\). Then we have the following identity:
Proof
Integrating by parts, we get
and
Using a variable change, multiplying the results by \(\alpha ^{2}(b-a)^{\alpha +1}2^{-\alpha -1}\) and \((1-\alpha )(b-a)^{2-\alpha }2^{\alpha -3}\), and summing side by side, we arrive at the following result:
Following similar steps, we obtain
Subtracting (4) from (5), we have
which completes the proof. □
Theorem 4
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R}^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a twice differentiable function on \(I^{o}\), where \(a,b\in I^{o}\) satisfy \(a< b\), and let \(f, f^{\prime },f^{\prime \prime }\in L_{1}[a,b]\). If \(|f^{\prime }|^{q}\) and \(|f^{\prime \prime }|^{q}\) are convex on \([a,b]\) for \(q\geq 1\), then we have the following inequality:
Proof
Firstly, let \(q=1\). By the convexity of \(|f^{\prime }|\) and \(|f^{\prime \prime }|\), from Lemma 1 it follows that
Secondly, consider \(q>1\). In view of Lemma 1, using the power mean inequality and the convexity of \(|f^{\prime }|^{q} \) and \(|f^{\prime \prime }|^{q}\), we obtain
This ends the proof. □
Now we illustrate our theorem by an example.
Example 2
Let the function \(f:[1,3]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be defined by \(f(x) =x^{3}+x^{2}\). Then the right-hand side of inequality (6) is
On the other hand, we obtain
As we can see in Fig. 2, the left-hand side of inequality (6) is always below the right-hand side of this inequality for all values of \(\alpha \in (0,1)\) and \(q\geq 1\).
Remark 2
Taking the limit as \(\alpha \rightarrow 1\) and putting \(q=1\) in Theorem 4, it follows that
as it was proved by Kırmacı [22].
Corollary 1
In the limiting case \(\alpha =0\) in Theorem 4, we obtain
Moreover, taking \(\alpha =\frac{1}{2}\), we have
Theorem 5
Let \(f:I\subset \mathbb{R} ^{+}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a twice differentiable function on \(I^{o}\), where \(a,b\in I^{o}\) satisfy \(a< b\), and let \(f, f^{\prime },f^{\prime \prime }\in L_{1}[a,b]\). If \(|f^{\prime }|^{q}\) and \(|f^{\prime \prime }|^{q}\) are convex on \([a,b]\) for \(q>1\), then we have the following inequality:
where \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\).
Proof
Employing the Hölder inequality and the convexity of \(|f^{\prime }|^{q}\) and \(|f^{\prime \prime }|^{q}\), by Lemma 1 we have
Also, by the inequality
for \(0\leq s<1\) and \(a_{k}\), \(b_{k}\geq 0\), \(k\in \{1,2,\ldots,n\}\), taking \(a_{1}= \vert f^{\prime } ( a ) \vert ^{q}\), \(b_{1}=3 \vert f^{\prime } ( b ) \vert ^{q}\), \(a_{2}=3 \vert f^{\prime } ( a ) \vert ^{q}\), \(b_{2}= \vert f^{\prime } ( b ) \vert ^{q}\), \(m_{1}= \vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a ) \vert ^{q}\), \(n_{1}=3 \vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b ) \vert ^{q}\), \(m_{2}=3 \vert f^{\prime \prime } ( a ) \vert ^{q}\), \(n_{2}= \vert f^{\prime \prime } ( b ) \vert ^{q}\), we derive
which completes the proof. □
To illustrate the inequality in Theorem 5, derived using the Hölder inequality, we provide the following.
Example 3
Consider the function f defined in Example 2. We can evaluate the expression on the right-hand side of inequality (7) as follows:
On the other hand, we know that
Thus from Fig. 3 we can observe that for all values of \(\alpha \in (0,1)\) and \(p> 1\), the left-hand side of inequality (7) is consistently lower than the right-hand side.
Remark 3
In the limiting case \(\alpha =1\) in Theorem 5, we get
as it was proved by Kırmacı [22].
Corollary 2
Taking the limit as \(\alpha \rightarrow 0\) in Theorem 5, we have
Also, taking \(\alpha =\frac{1}{2}\), we obtain
3 Conclusions
This work uses a proportional Caputo-hybrid operator to establish novel Hermite–Hadamard-type integral inequalities for twice-differentiable convex mappings. To do this, we begin by proving a new integral identity of the Hermite–Hadamard type associated with the proportional Caputo-hybrid operator. Later, using convexity, the Hölder inequality, and the power mean inequality, we give several Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities. Compared to classical calculus, our findings are more helpful because they present the particular situation of previously established boundaries as \(\alpha \to 1\). So we believe that our approach and findings will encourage the readers to learn more about this topic. Similar inequalities for different fractional integrals can be investigated in future studies, and by utilizing different types of convexity new Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities can be obtained.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this paper as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Abbas, M.I., Ragusa, M.A.: On the hybrid fractional differential equations with fractional proportional derivatives of a function with respect to a certain function. Symmetry 13(2), 264 (2021)
Alp, N., Sarıkaya, M.Z., Kunt, M., İşcan, İ.: q-Hermite Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. J. King Saud Univ., Sci. 30(2), 193–203 (2018)
Anderson, D.R., Ulness, D.J.: Newly defined conformable derivatives. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 10(2), 109–137 (2015)
Atangana, A., Baleanu, D.: New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 20(2), 763–769 (2016)
Balenau, D., Ferrandez, A., Akgül, A.: On a fractional operator combining proportional and classical differintegrals. Mathematics 8(3), 360 (2020)
Budak, H., Ertugral, F., Sarıkaya, M.Z.: New generalization of Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities via generalized fractional integrals. An. Univ. Craiova, Ser. Mat. Inform. 47(2), 369–386 (2020)
Budak, H., Tunç, T., Sarıkaya, M.Z.: Fractional Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 148(2), 705–718 (2020)
Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 73–85 (2015)
Diethelm, K.: The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations: An Application-Oriented Exposition Using Differential Operators of Caputo Type. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Dragomir, S.S., Agarwal, R.P.: Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 11(5), 91–95 (1998)
Dragomir, S.S., Pearce, C.E.M.: Selected topics on the Hermite–Hadamard inequalities and applications, RGMIA Monographs, Victoria University
Ertuğral, F., Sarıkaya, M.Z., Budak, H.: On Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities associated with the generalized fractional integrals. Filomat 36(12), 3983–3995 (2022)
Guariglia, E.: Riemann zeta fractional derivative-functional equation and link with primes. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019(1), 261 (2019)
Guariglia, E.: Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy. Open Math. 19(1), 87–100 (2021)
Günerhan, H., Dutta, H., Dokuyucu, M.A., Adel, W.: Analysis of a fractional HIV model with Caputo and constant proportional Caputo operators. Chaos Solitons Fractals 139, 110053 (2020)
Hadamard, J.: Etude sur les propriétés des fonctions entières et en particulier d’une fonction considérée par Riemann. J. Math. Pures Appl. 58, 171–215 (1893)
Hajaj, R., Odibat, Z.: Numerical solutions of fractional epidemic models with generalized Caputo-type derivatives. Phys. Scr. 98(4), 045206 (2023)
Hezenci, F., Kara, H., Budak, H.: Conformable fractional versions of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for twice-differentiable functions. Bound. Value Probl. 2023, 48 (2023)
Iqbal, M., Iqbal, B.M., Nazeer, K.: Generalization of inequalities analogous to Hermite–Hadamard inequality via fractional integrals. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 52(3), 707–716 (2015)
Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: On the generalized fractional derivatives and their Caputo modification. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10(5), 2607–2619 (2017)
Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Kırmacı, U.S.: Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers to midpoint formula. Appl. Math. Comput. 147(5), 137–146 (2004)
Li, C., Dao, X., Guo, P.: Fractional derivatives in complex planes. Nonlinear Anal. 71(5–6), 1857–1869 (2009)
Mohammed, P.O., Brevik, I.: A new version of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Symmetry 12(4), 610 (2020)
Ragusa, M.A.: Commutators of fractional integral operators on Vanishing-Morrey spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 40(1–3), 361–368 (2008)
Rahman, G., Nisar, K.S., Abdeljawad, T.: Certain Hadamard proportional fractional integral inequalities. Mathematics 8(4), 504 (2020)
Sabzikar, F., Meerschaert, M.M., Chen, J.: Tempered fractional calculus. J. Comput. Phys. 293, 14–28 (2015)
Samko, S., Kilbas, A., Marichev, O.: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon & Breach, London (1993)
Sarıkaya, M.Z.: On Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for proportional Caputo-hybrid operator. Konuralp J. Math. 11(1), 31–39 (2023)
Sarıkaya, M.Z., Set, E., Yaldız, H., Basak, N.: Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 57(9–10), 2403–2407 (2013)
Sarıkaya, M.Z., Yıldırım, H.: On Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals. Miskolc Math. Notes 17(2), 1049–1059 (2017)
Wang, Z., Sun, L.: The Allen–Cahn equation with a time Caputo–Hadamard derivative: mathematical and numerical analysis. Commun. Anal. Mech. 15(4), 611–637 (2023)
Wang, Z., Zhao, K., Li, P., Liu, Y.: Boundedness of square functions related with fractional Schrödinger semigroups on stratified Lie groups. Commun. Anal. Mech. 15(3), 410–435 (2023)
Funding
There is no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.T. and İ.D. wrote the main manuscript text and İ.D. prepared Figs. 1-3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tunç, T., Demir, İ. On a new version of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequality based on proportional Caputo-hybrid operator. Bound Value Probl 2024, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-024-01852-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-024-01852-4